Latest Adventure of Net Nazis Tavish & Artiq
Andreew A. Skolniick
turns his terrible talents to proving that the Aussies don't exist.
Check out the latest Net Nazi adventures of Tavish & Artiq:
http://internettrash.com/users/satireworld/newindex.html
Thanks to Snap Shot and his latest muse.
-- Andrew
Lou Minatti™
Please ask Snap Shot to work Grosvenor in there.
--
ALL NEW HATEMAIL! LOTSA FUN STUFF!
http://www.watchingyou.com/hatemail.html
Doc Tavish
cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!
firehose.mindspring.com!not-for-mail
From: "Andreew A. Skolniick" <askol...@stopNazi.spam.mindspring.com>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,sci.skeptic
Subject: Latest Adventure of Net Nazis Tavish & Artiq
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 19:00:02 -0500
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <38EE7682...@stopNazi.spam.mindspring.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: a5.79.d9.44
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Server-Date: 8 Apr 2000 00:00:23 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
On Fri, 07 Apr 2000 19:00:02 -0500, "Andreew A. Skolniick" <askol...@stopNazi.spam.mindspring.com> wrote:
>Not content with trying to rid the world of the evil Joos, Tavish
>turns his terrible talents to proving that the Aussies don't exist.
Care to back up your actionable defamatory libelous lie before
a judge Andrew? Show evidence where I have "turn[ed] [my] terrible
talents to proving that the Aussies don't exist." It is NOT satire when
you base your smear on a lie as its foundation!
FWD <ab...@mindspring.com>
Scott Bradbury aka Doc Tavish
>Check out the latest Net Nazi adventures of Tavish & Artiq:
More actionable slander and defamation.
>http://internettrash.com/users/satireworld/newindex.html
>
>Thanks to Snap Shot and his latest muse.
>
>-- Andrew
Dave
---
-Dave
________________________________________________
"I bet he didn't know that Hitler had a 14 inch cock" -Adam J
Orac
>On Fri, 07 Apr 2000 19:00:02 -0500, "Andreew A. Skolniick"
><askol...@stopNazi.spam.mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>>Not content with trying to rid the world of the evil Joos, Tavish
>>turns his terrible talents to proving that the Aussies don't exist.
>
>Care to back up your actionable defamatory libelous lie before
>a judge Andrew? Show evidence where I have "turn[ed] [my] terrible
>talents to proving that the Aussies don't exist." It is NOT satire when
>you base your smear on a lie as its foundation!
He exaggerated some of your kinds of logic (although, admittedly, not by much).
Exaggeration is a means and form of satire. Deal with it.
>FWD <ab...@mindspring.com>
>
> Scott Bradbury aka Doc Tavish
>
>>Check out the latest Net Nazi adventures of Tavish & Artiq:
>
>More actionable slander and defamation.
Do tell, Scotty. Looks like nothing more than satire, and satire is generally
protected speech. You'll have a hell of a time if you go to court.
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
Orac
<da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
He has to. No one else does.
Ed Kadach
>
> In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
>
> He has to. No one else does.
>
> --
> Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
his actions.
Racialist regards,
Ed Kadach
Buck Turgidson
-- --Dep
"Always tell the truth. It's the § "Truth is just...truth. You can't
easiest thing to remember." § have opinions about truth."
--David Mamet --Peter Schickele
Like short-haired women? Snotty comments? Penguins?
http://members.aol.com/deppitybob/shlu/PAGEONE.html
Buck Turgidson
Doesn't say much for them, does it?
> Racialist regards,
> Ed Kadach
Re--oh, you know.
Warren's All-Stars
Ed KKKadach wrote:
> Orac wrote:
> >
> > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
> >
> > He has to. No one else does.
> >
> > --
> > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
>
> That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
> people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
> his actions.
>
> Racialist regards,
> Ed Kadach
Eddie, do you take Scottikins seriously when he talks about his Desert
Eagle.50, his Cessna Citation, his 4 Benzes and his imaginary friend,
Bruno?
Steve
Ed Kadach
>
> So how was your 12-hour R&R, Gutless?
>
> -- --Dep
Who can hardly blame him when he's advised that a Yale F. Edeiken
mailing list recipient has once again posted private information
along with hints of causing him harm or duress.
Racialist regards,
Ed Kadach
Philip Mathews
>
>
>Ed Kadach edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
>Buck Turgidson wrote:
>>
>> Ed Kadach wrote:
>>
>> > Orac wrote:
>> > >
>> > > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
>> > > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
>> > >
>> > > He has to. No one else does.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
>> >
>> > That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
>> > people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
>> > his actions.
>>
>> Doesn't say much for them, does it?
>>
>> > Racialist regards,
>> > Ed Kadach
>>
>> Re--oh, you know.
>>
>> -- --Dep
>
>
>It doesn't say much about all you anti-exterminationists
>coming to the aid of a problematic lunatic such as Yale.
Ah no, anti-exterminationists would be you, idiot.
And Yale hardly needs help with the F Troop of AR.
>
>Rac-- ah.. ,you know,
>Ed Kadach
Regards to a racist,
--
Philip Mathews
On February 1, 1999 David E. Michael said:
If they are so innocent and inoffensive, why have they been reviled and
loathed throughout history in a wide variety of circumstances? There are at
least some aspects of Jewish culture that do, I'm afraid, tend to invite
bitterness. Having been resoundingly stabbed in the back by one whom I liked
and trusted, at a time when I was a lot more favourably disposed to these
people, I assure you that I speak from personal experience.
"Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing
knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant
than would take even a little trouble to acquire it." Samuel Johnson
Ed Kadach
>
> Ed Kadach wrote:
>
> > Orac wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> > > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
> > >
> > > He has to. No one else does.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> >
> > That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
> > people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
> > his actions.
>
> Doesn't say much for them, does it?
>
> > Racialist regards,
> > Ed Kadach
>
> Re--oh, you know.
>
> -- --Dep
It doesn't say much about all you anti-exterminationists
coming to the aid of a problematic lunatic such as Yale.
Rac-- ah.. ,you know,
Ed Kadach
Ed Kadach
>
> Ed KKKadach wrote:
>
> > Orac wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> > > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
> > >
> > > He has to. No one else does.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> >
> > That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
> > people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
> > his actions.
> >
> > Ed Kadach
>
> Eddie, do you take Scottikins seriously when he talks about his Desert
> Eagle.50, his Cessna Citation, his 4 Benzes and his imaginary friend,
> Bruno?
>
> Steve
Until proven otherwise I see no reason not to believe him.
Why anyone would need 4 Benzes though is beyond me.
Regards,
Ed Kadach
Ed Kadach
>
> In >Message-id: <38EFA9...@connect.ab.ca>
> >
> >
>
> >Ed Kadach edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Ed Kadach wrote:
> >>
> >> > Orac wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> >> > > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
> >> > >
> >> > > He has to. No one else does.
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> >> >
> >> > That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
> >> > people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
> >> > his actions.
> >>
> >>
> >> > Racialist regards,
> >> > Ed Kadach
> >>
> >> Re--oh, you know.
> >>
> >> -- --Dep
> >
> >
> >It doesn't say much about all you anti-exterminationists
> >coming to the aid of a problematic lunatic such as Yale.
>
Thank-you for pointing that out. It was a mere slip between the
hip and the lip. Idiot, you say. Ouch!!
> And Yale hardly needs help with the F Troop of AR.
Oh, Yale's going to need help alright. Lots of legal help
and psychiatric help.
Regards,
Ed Kadach
>
> >
> >Rac-- ah.. ,you know,
> >Ed Kadach
>
> Regards to a racist,
>
Sara Salzman
>Warren's All-Stars wrote:
>>
>> Ed KKKadach wrote:
>>
>> > Orac wrote:
>> > >
>> > > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
>> > > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
>> > >
>> > > He has to. No one else does.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
>> >
>> > That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
>> > people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
>> > his actions.
>> >
>> > Racialist regards,
>> > Ed Kadach
>>
>> Eddie, do you take Scottikins seriously when he talks about his Desert
>> Eagle.50, his Cessna Citation, his 4 Benzes and his imaginary friend,
>> Bruno?
>>
>> Steve
>
>
>Until proven otherwise I see no reason not to believe him.
>Why anyone would need 4 Benzes though is beyond me.
>
>
>Regards,
>Ed Kadach
Ed:
Does this prove "otherwise" about Scotty's Cessna?
"A search of the AVWeb (www.avweb.com) copy of the FAA aircraft registry
database for the name Bradbury reveals no aircraft registered to a Scott
Bradbury, R. Heydrich, or to anyone with the last name of Tavish.
Of the Bradburys listed with aircraft, none of the aircraft are Cessna
Fan Jet Citations. Likewise, there is no Heydrich listed as owning a
Citation. Maybe he could supply the tail number?
Of course, it may be foreign registered, or acquired after 1/1/1999
(last update to this copy of the database) . . ."
Sara
--
"My opinion is that there would have never been an Infidel
if there had never been a priest."
Thomas Jefferson
Warren's All-Stars
Ed Kadach wrote:
You mean he's so psycho that he hasn't bothered to change his phone
number? Have you changed your phone number, Eddie? It's not hard to
do. Even you and Scottikins could probably do it.
Steve
Warren's All-Stars
Ed KKKadach wrote:
> Warren's All-Stars wrote:
> >
> > Ed KKKadach wrote:
> >
> > > Orac wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> > > > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
> > > >
> > > > He has to. No one else does.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> > >
> > > That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
> > > people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
> > > his actions.
> > >
> > > Racialist regards,
> > > Ed Kadach
> >
> > Eddie, do you take Scottikins seriously when he talks about his Desert
> > Eagle.50, his Cessna Citation, his 4 Benzes and his imaginary friend,
> > Bruno?
> >
> > Steve
>
> Until proven otherwise I see no reason not to believe him.
> Why anyone would need 4 Benzes though is beyond me.
>
> Regards,
> Ed Kadach
Eddie, this answer says a lot about you. Unfortunately, what it says ain't
good.
Steve
Warren's All-Stars
Philip Mathews wrote:
> In >Message-id: <38EFA9...@connect.ab.ca>
> >
> >
>
> >Ed Kadach edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
>
> >Buck Turgidson wrote:
> >>
> >> Ed Kadach wrote:
> >>
> >> > Orac wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> >> > > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
> >> > >
> >> > > He has to. No one else does.
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> >> >
> >> > That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
> >> > people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
> >> > his actions.
> >>
> >> Doesn't say much for them, does it?
> >>
> >> > Racialist regards,
> >> > Ed Kadach
> >>
> >> Re--oh, you know.
> >>
> >> -- --Dep
> >
> >
> >It doesn't say much about all you anti-exterminationists
> >coming to the aid of a problematic lunatic such as Yale.
>
> Ah no, anti-exterminationists would be you, idiot.
Looks like someone slipped KKKadach the new-improved high-potency stupid pills.
Steve
>
>
> And Yale hardly needs help with the F Troop of AR.
>
> >
> >Rac-- ah.. ,you know,
> >Ed Kadach
>
> Regards to a racist,
>
Orac
>Orac wrote:
>>
>> In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
>> <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
>>
>> He has to. No one else does.
>
>That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
>people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
>his actions.
Name one.
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
Orac
>Warren's All-Stars wrote:
>>
>> Ed KKKadach wrote:
>> > That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
>> > people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
>> > his actions.
>>
>> Eddie, do you take Scottikins seriously when he talks about his Desert
>> Eagle.50, his Cessna Citation, his 4 Benzes and his imaginary friend,
>> Bruno?
>>
>> Steve
>
>Until proven otherwise I see no reason not to believe him.
>Why anyone would need 4 Benzes though is beyond me.
We've had our disagreements, and I've found many faults about you, but
excessive gullibility was never one of them. Now it is.
Doc Tavish
On 8-Apr-2000, Ed Kadach <edd...@connect.ab.ca> wrote:
> Buck Turgidson wrote:
> >
> > So how was your 12-hour R&R, Gutless?
> >
> > -- --Dep
>
>
> Who can hardly blame him when he's advised that a Yale F. Edeiken
> mailing list recipient has once again posted private information
> along with hints of causing him harm or duress.
>
>
> Racialist regards,
> Ed Kadach
I will once again try to get some rest BUT I will come back if the "hotline"
is activated. This current outburst of harassment will be brought to the
proper authorities and the perpetrators will be made to take responsibility.
Doc Tavish
Warren's All-Stars
one reason why nobody takes you seriously. It is just further proof that you
are a psychotic badly in need of treatment.
Steve
Doc Tavish
Subject: Re: Latest Adventure of Net Nazis Tavish & Artiq
Date: 08 Apr 2000 18:17:09 EDT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Message-ID: <catamont-080...@ts006d14.den-co.concentric.net>
References: <8cnfl...@news2.newsguy.com> <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk> <Orac-A9DA9A.1...@news.earthlink.net> <38EF6A...@connect.ab.ca> <38EF83FD...@erols.com> <38EFAA...@connect.ab.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ts006d14.den-co.concentric.net
X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4
On 8-Apr-2000, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
> In article <38EFAA...@connect.ab.ca>, edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
>
> >Warren's All-Stars wrote:
> >>
> >> Ed KKKadach wrote:
> >>
> >> > Orac wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> >> > > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
> >> > > He has to. No one else does.
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> >> > That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
> >> > people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
> >> > his actions.
My fan mail proves it too!
> >> > Racialist regards,
> >> > Ed Kadach
> >> Eddie, do you take Scottikins seriously when he talks about his Desert
> >> Eagle.50, his Cessna Citation, his 4 Benzes and his imaginary friend,
> >> Bruno?
> >>
> >> Steve
> >Until proven otherwise I see no reason not to believe him.
> >Why anyone would need 4 Benzes though is beyond me.
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >Ed Kadach
> Ed:
>
> Does this prove "otherwise" about Scotty's Cessna?
>
> "A search of the AVWeb (www.avweb.com) copy of the FAA aircraft registry
> database for the name Bradbury reveals no aircraft registered to a Scott
> Bradbury, R. Heydrich, or to anyone with the last name of Tavish.
>
> Of the Bradburys listed with aircraft, none of the aircraft are Cessna
> Fan Jet Citations. Likewise, there is no Heydrich listed as owning a
> Citation. Maybe he could supply the tail number?
>
> Of course, it may be foreign registered, or acquired after 1/1/1999
> (last update to this copy of the database) . . ."
>
> Sara
Isn't one of the defining descriptions of an internet STALKER a person that
has an abnormal interest in the private life of another person? Are you
not invading my privacy? Since when what I own or not own any of
your damned business you squealing little sow? Consider having a
"cease and desist" order levied on you for being a documented stalker!
Doc Tavish
Doc Tavish
On 8-Apr-2000, Ed Kadach <edd...@connect.ab.ca> wrote:
> Buck Turgidson wrote:
> >
> > So how was your 12-hour R&R, Gutless?
> >
> > -- --Dep
>
>
> Who can hardly blame him when he's advised that a Yale F. Edeiken
> mailing list recipient has once again posted private information
> along with hints of causing him harm or duress.
Evidence which will be used against him in an upcoming criminal prosecution.
> Racialist regards,
> Ed Kadach
Warren's All-Stars
Doc Tavish wrote:
She wasn't even responding to you, you demented sicko. She was responding to KKKadach. Now go get the certified check for Yale.
Steve
Warren's All-Stars
Doc Tavish wrote:
The same one you've been promising for two years now? Even if you had a case,
the statute of limitations would run out before you got off your lazy ass.
Stupid loony.
Steve
>
>
> > Racialist regards,
> > Ed Kadach
Sara Salzman
[Tavish drivel snipped]
Public domain, Idiot.
I didn't care one way or another about your fantasy plane. That
information was e-mailed to me by a total stranger.
Send that certified check yet? Or do you want to say "bench warrant" instead?
Jeffrey G. Brown
you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
> [...deletia...]
>> Does this prove "otherwise" about Scotty's Cessna?
>>
>> "A search of the AVWeb (www.avweb.com) copy of the FAA aircraft registry
>> database for the name Bradbury reveals no aircraft registered to a Scott
>> Bradbury, R. Heydrich, or to anyone with the last name of Tavish.
>>
>> Of the Bradburys listed with aircraft, none of the aircraft are Cessna
>> Fan Jet Citations. Likewise, there is no Heydrich listed as owning a
>> Citation. Maybe he could supply the tail number?
>>
>> Of course, it may be foreign registered, or acquired after 1/1/1999
>> (last update to this copy of the database) . . ."
>>
>> Sara
>
>Isn't one of the defining descriptions of an internet STALKER a person that
>has an abnormal interest in the private life of another person?
Isn't one of the defining descriptions of a liar a person who makes claims
that aren't true?
You don't own a Cessna, Scottie.
You're a lying coward.
>Are you not invading my privacy?
You made a claim in a public newsgroup, Cockroach Boy.
You don't own a Cessna, Scottie.
You're a lying coward.
>Since when what I own or not own any of your damned business you squealing
>little sow?
Since when do self-proclaimed 'truth tellers' make claims that aren't
borne out by the facts, little insect?
You don't own a Cessna, Scottie.
You're a lying coward.
>Consider having a "cease and desist" order levied on you for being a
>documented stalker!
Consider being a documented liar, O Gutless One.
You don't own a Cessna, Scottie.
You're a lying coward.
JGB
=======================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jg_b...@deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
Brimstone
Brimstone
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Brimstone
by KRISTIN CASLER, The Morning Call
Allentown attorney Yale F. Edeiken was found guilty and fined
$600 plus costs for a confrontation with a Lehigh County deputy
sheriff and another man in a courthouse elevator.
During the June 12 incident, Edeiken struck Deputy Brenda
Hartman with his briefcase and allegedly threatened the man by
saying he had a gun, according to District Justice Diane Jepsen,
who heard the case. Edeiken later was found to have a permit for
and was carrying a .357 Magnum.
Jepsen ordered Edeiken, whose office is at 39 N. 5th St., to pay
the fine after a hearing Monday on charges of harassment and
disorderly conduct filed by Hartman. Jepsen said Edeiken no
longer has a permit for his gun.
According to the complaint, Hartman was in the courthouse side
elevator, which usually is reserved for prisoner transport, with
Joanne Keller. Keller, who was not handcuffed, had just been
sentenced and Hartman was taking her to pay fines and costs
before her release.
Also on the elevator were Edeiken, David Raymond, public
defender Earl Supplee and county courier Bill Bichel.
Edeiken told Jepsen that Raymond, a convicted felon who had
burglarized him, pushed his way onto the elevator.
But Jepsen said other witnesses testified that Raymond already
was on the elevator when Edeiken boarded and started a shoving
match. Witnesses varied on what was said.
Witnesses said Edeiken called Hartman a whore, but Edeiken said
he was referring to Keller.
Raymond is a friend of Keller, and Keller once resided at a
house owned by Edeiken. Edeiken was at the courthouse as a
character witness for Keller at her sentencing.
Edeiken swung his briefcase at Raymond, striking him and
Hartman, according to testimony.
Hartman opened the elevator doors on the third floor and ordered
Edeiken to get out. He refused, and as Raymond attempted to
exit, Edeiken told Raymond he had a gun and moved as if he was
going to draw it. No weapon was seen.
Raymond and Supplee then went downstairs for help, and Hartman
took Edeiken and Keller to the bullpen where prisoners are held
pending their proceedings, Jepsen said. Hartman told them to
stay until she got help. When she returned, Edeiken was gone.
Yale F. Edeiken
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cofa...@news2.newsguy.com...
> On 8-Apr-2000, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>
> > In article <38EFAA...@connect.ab.ca>, edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
> >
> > >Warren's All-Stars wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Ed KKKadach wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Orac wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> > >> > > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
>
> > >> > > He has to. No one else does.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> My fan mail proves it too!
> > >> Eddie, do you take Scottikins seriously when he talks about his
Desert
> > >> Eagle.50, his Cessna Citation, his 4 Benzes and his imaginary friend,
> > >> Bruno?
> > >>
> > >> Steve
>
> > >Until proven otherwise I see no reason not to believe him.
> > >Why anyone would need 4 Benzes though is beyond me.
> > >
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Ed Kadach
>
> > Ed:
> >
> > Does this prove "otherwise" about Scotty's Cessna?
> >
> > "A search of the AVWeb (www.avweb.com) copy of the FAA aircraft registry
> > database for the name Bradbury reveals no aircraft registered to a Scott
> > Bradbury, R. Heydrich, or to anyone with the last name of Tavish.
> >
> > Of the Bradburys listed with aircraft, none of the aircraft are Cessna
> > Fan Jet Citations. Likewise, there is no Heydrich listed as owning a
> > Citation. Maybe he could supply the tail number?
> >
> > Of course, it may be foreign registered, or acquired after 1/1/1999
> > (last update to this copy of the database) . . ."
> Isn't one of the defining descriptions of an internet STALKER a person
that
> has an abnormal interest in the private life of another person?
No.
> Are you
> not invading my privacy?
No. You amde a public statement.
> Since when what I own or not own any of
> your damned business you squealing little sow?\
When you lied about it.
> Consider having a
> "cease and desist" order levied on you for being a documented stalker!
By which one of your imaginary courts, Defendant Brabbury.
And when can I expect a certified check from you.
The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
deleted as the garbage that it is.
Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
charactiture of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his
basically incoherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a
notorious liar and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by utter
dishonesty and include such criminal activities as forging the posts of
others and issuing death threats. He has threatened one person who exposed
his lies with sexual molestation, torture, death and mutilation. There is,
of course, not a word of truth in the venom he spews so freely.
For a refutation of this and his other lies about the Talmud and Judaism
consult:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/
--YFE
The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/
Philip Mathews
>Ed Kadach edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
>Philip Mathews wrote:
>>
>> In >Message-id: <38EFA9...@connect.ab.ca>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> >Ed Kadach edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
>>
>> >Buck Turgidson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Ed Kadach wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Orac wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
>> >> > > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
>> >> > >
>> >> > > He has to. No one else does.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
>> >> >
>> >> > That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
>> >> > people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
>> >> > his actions.
>> >>
>> >> Doesn't say much for them, does it?
>> >>
>> >> > Racialist regards,
>> >> > Ed Kadach
>> >>
>> >> Re--oh, you know.
>> >>
>> >> -- --Dep
>> >
>> >
>> >It doesn't say much about all you anti-exterminationists
>> >coming to the aid of a problematic lunatic such as Yale.
>>
>> Ah no, anti-exterminationists would be you, idiot.
>
>
>
>Thank-you for pointing that out. It was a mere slip between the
>hip and the lip. Idiot, you say. Ouch!!
No, between brain and mouth.
>
>
>
>> And Yale hardly needs help with the F Troop of AR.
>
>
>Oh, Yale's going to need help alright. Lots of legal help
>and psychiatric help.
Bullshit. As if you would have the slightest clue!
Doc Tavish
On 8-Apr-2000, Brimstone <mr_brimsto...@excite.com.invalid> wrote:
> Doc, Sara wants you to come watch her screw the dogs.
>
>
>
> Brimstone
Isn't it about time for a repost about the Talmudic passage which sanctions
such activity? :-)
Doc Tavish
Doc Tavish
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism
Subject: Evidence that Doc Tavish Is An Idiot
Date: 08 Apr 2000 22:10:47 EDT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Message-ID: <catamont-080...@ts018d06.den-co.concentric.net>
On 8-Apr-2000, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
> In article <8cofa...@news2.newsguy.com>, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com
> wrote:
> [Tavish drivel snipped]
>
> Public domain, Idiot.
>
> I didn't care one way or another about your fantasy plane. That
> information was e-mailed to me by a total stranger.
> Send that certified check yet? Or do you want to say "bench warrant" instead?
More evidence that you have more than a casual interest in my personal life!
Care to provide even more you squealing little piglet?
Doc Tavish
> Sara
Jeffrey G. Brown
you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>More evidence that you have more than a casual interest in my personal life!
No, Cockroach Boy. It's not your personal life we're interested in.
It's all your lies about your personal life. They demonstrate quite
clearly how little credibility you have.
Fledgist
>Isn't one of the defining descriptions of an internet STALKER a person that
>not invading my privacy?
She's invading your privacy by looking up your name in a public record? Now,
either the definition of "privacy" has changed since yesterday or you are a
moron. Which is it, pray tell?
Fragano Ledgister
(Fled...@aol.com)
Dawn over the dark sea brings on the sun;
She leans across the hilltop: see, the light!
Fledgist
>>> <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>> >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
>>>
>>> He has to. No one else does.
>>
>>people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
>>his actions.
>
>
>--
Sneezy.
Sara Salzman
fled...@aol.comkillspam (Fledgist) wrote:
>>
>>Isn't one of the defining descriptions of an internet STALKER a person that
>>has an abnormal interest in the private life of another person? Are you
>>not invading my privacy?
>
>She's invading your privacy by looking up your name in a public record? Now,
>either the definition of "privacy" has changed since yesterday or you are a
>moron. Which is it, pray tell?
>Fragano Ledgister
>(Fled...@aol.com)
>Dawn over the dark sea brings on the sun;
>She leans across the hilltop: see, the light!
And of course, what Bradbury lies about, Frangano, is that I didn't look
the information up. It was e-mailed to me by a total stanger who was sick
and tired of Bradbury's garbage.
Orac
>It doesn't say much about all you anti-exterminationists
>coming to the aid of a problematic lunatic such as Yale.
Wouldn't the "anti-exterminationists" be you and Scotty?
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
Orac
>From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
>Subject: Re: Latest Adventure of Net Nazis Tavish & Artiq
>Date: 08 Apr 2000 18:17:09 EDT
>Organization: Concentric Internet Services
>Message-ID: <catamont-080...@ts006d14.den-co.concentric.net>
>References: <8cnfl...@news2.newsguy.com>
><8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>
><Orac-A9DA9A.1...@news.earthlink.net>
><38EF6A...@connect.ab.ca> <38EF83FD...@erols.com>
><38EFAA...@connect.ab.ca>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: ts006d14.den-co.concentric.net
>X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4
>> Does this prove "otherwise" about Scotty's Cessna?
>>
>> "A search of the AVWeb (www.avweb.com) copy of the FAA aircraft registry
>> database for the name Bradbury reveals no aircraft registered to a Scott
>> Bradbury, R. Heydrich, or to anyone with the last name of Tavish.
>>
>> Of the Bradburys listed with aircraft, none of the aircraft are Cessna
>> Fan Jet Citations. Likewise, there is no Heydrich listed as owning a
>> Citation. Maybe he could supply the tail number?
>>
>> Of course, it may be foreign registered, or acquired after 1/1/1999
>> (last update to this copy of the database) . . ."
>>
>> Sara
>
>Isn't one of the defining descriptions of an internet STALKER a person that
>has an abnormal interest in the private life of another person? Are you
>not invading my privacy? Since when what I own or not own any of
>your damned business you squealing little sow? Consider having a
>"cease and desist" order levied on you for being a documented stalker!
LOL! My, you're getting pathetic. She wasn't even responding to you. She was
responding to Ed.
Orac
>On 8-Apr-2000, Ed Kadach <edd...@connect.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> Buck Turgidson wrote:
>> >
>> > So how was your 12-hour R&R, Gutless?
>> >
>> > -- --Dep
>>
>>
>> Who can hardly blame him when he's advised that a Yale F. Edeiken
>> mailing list recipient has once again posted private information
>> along with hints of causing him harm or duress.
>
>Evidence which will be used against him in an upcoming criminal prosecution.
Have you filed your complaint yet? It ought to be good for a laugh or two.
Orac
wrote:
>I will once again try to get some rest BUT I will come back if the "hotline"
>is activated. This current outburst of harassment will be brought to the
>proper authorities and the perpetrators will be made to take responsibility.
Your little "rest" breaks seldom last very long; so why should we believe you
now?
Jeffrey G. Brown
fled...@aol.comkillspam (Fledgist) wrote:
>>
>>Isn't one of the defining descriptions of an internet STALKER a person that
>>has an abnormal interest in the private life of another person? Are you
>>not invading my privacy?
>
>She's invading your privacy by looking up your name in a public record? Now,
>either the definition of "privacy" has changed since yesterday or you are a
>moron. Which is it, pray tell?
I'd vote for the "moron" option -- especially since Poor Ol' Gutless
Scottie is complaining about being searched for in a database that does
_not_ contain his name.
Fledgist
>In article <20000409080558...@ng-cn1.aol.com>,
>fled...@aol.comkillspam (Fledgist) wrote:
>
>>>
>>>Isn't one of the defining descriptions of an internet STALKER a person that
>>>has an abnormal interest in the private life of another person? Are you
>>>not invading my privacy?
>>
>>She's invading your privacy by looking up your name in a public record? Now,
>>either the definition of "privacy" has changed since yesterday or you are a
>>moron. Which is it, pray tell?
>>(Fled...@aol.com)
>>Dawn over the dark sea brings on the sun;
>>She leans across the hilltop: see, the light!
>
>And of course, what Bradbury lies about, Frangano, is that I didn't look
>the information up. It was e-mailed to me by a total stanger who was sick
>and tired of Bradbury's garbage.
>
>Sara
>
I'm not at all surprised that he'd lie about something as simple as that. But
then he is a moron.
an0...@hotmail.com
<doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote:
>From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
>Subject: Re: Latest Adventure of Net Nazis Tavish & Artiq
>Date: 08 Apr 2000 18:17:09 EDT
>Organization: Concentric Internet Services
>Message-ID: <catamont-080...@ts006d14.den-co.concentric.net>
>References: <8cnfl...@news2.newsguy.com> <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk> <Orac-A9DA9A.1...@news.earthlink.net> <38EF6A...@connect.ab.ca> <38EF83FD...@erols.com> <38EFAA...@connect.ab.ca>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: ts006d14.den-co.concentric.net
>X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4
>
>On 8-Apr-2000, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>
>> In article <38EFAA...@connect.ab.ca>, edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
>>
>> >Warren's All-Stars wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Ed KKKadach wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Orac wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
>> >> > > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
>
>> >> > > He has to. No one else does.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
>
>> >> > That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
>> >> > people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
>> >> > his actions.
>
>My fan mail proves it too!
>
>> >> > Racialist regards,
>> >> > Ed Kadach
>
>> >> Eddie, do you take Scottikins seriously when he talks about his Desert
>> >> Eagle.50, his Cessna Citation, his 4 Benzes and his imaginary friend,
>> >> Bruno?
>> >>
>> >> Steve
>
>> >Until proven otherwise I see no reason not to believe him.
>> >Why anyone would need 4 Benzes though is beyond me.
>> >
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >Ed Kadach
>
>> Ed:
>>
>> Does this prove "otherwise" about Scotty's Cessna?
>>
>> "A search of the AVWeb (www.avweb.com) copy of the FAA aircraft registry
>> database for the name Bradbury reveals no aircraft registered to a Scott
>> Bradbury, R. Heydrich, or to anyone with the last name of Tavish.
>>
>> Of the Bradburys listed with aircraft, none of the aircraft are Cessna
>> Fan Jet Citations. Likewise, there is no Heydrich listed as owning a
>> Citation. Maybe he could supply the tail number?
>>
>> Of course, it may be foreign registered, or acquired after 1/1/1999
>> (last update to this copy of the database) . . ."
>>
>> Sara
>
>Isn't one of the defining descriptions of an internet STALKER a person that
>has an abnormal interest in the private life of another person? Are you
>not invading my privacy? Since when what I own or not own any of
>your damned business you squealing little sow? Consider having a
>"cease and desist" order levied on you for being a documented stalker!
>
> Doc Tavish
Ah...now we see Scotty squealing that he objects to being caught in
another lie....objecting to someone pointing out information in the
public domain...another example of the coward that he is.
Then he utters the equivalent of "I'm telling on you"
You are such a pathetic loser, Mr. Bradbury (though you are typical of
the racist that you are).
"Business?!? *mankind* was my business!!"
-The ghost of Jacob Marley to Scrooge "A Christmas Carol"
By Charles Dickens
an0...@hotmail.com
<doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote:
>I will once again try to get some rest BUT I will come back if the "hotline"
>is activated. This current outburst of harassment will be brought to the
>proper authorities and the perpetrators will be made to take responsibility.
>
> Doc Tavish
Maybe you should check into a nice sanitorium? Perhaps (with much
effort on your part) they could turn you into a human being! You
know, someone with decency, morals...ethics.
You'd have to want it though......
an0...@hotmail.com
Another example of witty repartee from the racists.
*yawn*
On Sat, 08 Apr 2000 20:38:02 -0700, Brimstone
<mr_brimsto...@excite.com.invalid> wrote:
>Doc, Sara wants you to come watch her screw the dogs.
>
>
>
>Brimstone
>
>* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
>The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
>
"Business?!? *mankind* was my business!!"
an0...@hotmail.com
Hey, you said you were going away!
Just *another* lie???
On Sun, 9 Apr 2000 05:35:25 GMT, "Doc Tavish"
<doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote:
>
>On 8-Apr-2000, Brimstone <mr_brimsto...@excite.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Doc, Sara wants you to come watch her screw the dogs.
>>
>>
>>
>> Brimstone
>
>Isn't it about time for a repost about the Talmudic passage which sanctions
>such activity? :-)
>
> Doc Tavish
"Business?!? *mankind* was my business!!"
Ed Kadach
>
> On 8-Apr-2000, Ed Kadach <edd...@connect.ab.ca> wrote:
>
> > Buck Turgidson wrote:
> > >
> > > So how was your 12-hour R&R, Gutless?
> > >
> > > -- --Dep
> >
> >
> > Who can hardly blame him when he's advised that a Yale F. Edeiken
> > mailing list recipient has once again posted private information
> > along with hints of causing him harm or duress.
>
> Evidence which will be used against him in an upcoming criminal prosecution.
>
> > Ed Kadach
I should hope so, people like Yale ought not to be allowed
on the streets.
Regards,
Ed Kadach
Ed Kadach
>
> In article <38EF6A...@connect.ab.ca>, edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
>
> >Orac wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> >> <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >> >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
> >>
> >> He has to. No one else does.
> >
> >people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
> >his actions.
>
Me!!
Regards,
Ed Kadach
Ed Kadach
>
> In article <38EFA9...@connect.ab.ca>, edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
>
> >It doesn't say much about all you anti-exterminationists
> >coming to the aid of a problematic lunatic such as Yale.
>
> Wouldn't the "anti-exterminationists" be you and Scotty?
Yes, that is correct, my error has already been pointed out to
me by one of your buddies. Can't remember if it was Mock or
Mathews or Murphy. The Three Musketeers!
Regards,
Ed Kadach
Ed Kadach
>
> In article <38EFAA...@connect.ab.ca>, edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
>
> >Warren's All-Stars wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > Orac wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> >> > > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
> >> > >
> >> > > He has to. No one else does.
> >> > >
> >> > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> >> >
> >> > people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
> >> > his actions.
> >> >
> >> > Ed Kadach
> >>
> >> Eddie, do you take Scottikins seriously when he talks about his Desert
> >> Eagle.50, his Cessna Citation, his 4 Benzes and his imaginary friend,
> >> Bruno?
> >>
> >> Steve
> >
> >
> >Until proven otherwise I see no reason not to believe him.
> >Why anyone would need 4 Benzes though is beyond me.
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >Ed Kadach
>
> Ed:
>
> Does this prove "otherwise" about Scotty's Cessna?
>
> "A search of the AVWeb (www.avweb.com) copy of the FAA aircraft registry
> database for the name Bradbury reveals no aircraft registered to a Scott
> Bradbury, R. Heydrich, or to anyone with the last name of Tavish.
>
> Of the Bradburys listed with aircraft, none of the aircraft are Cessna
> Fan Jet Citations. Likewise, there is no Heydrich listed as owning a
> Citation. Maybe he could supply the tail number?
>
> Of course, it may be foreign registered, or acquired after 1/1/1999
> (last update to this copy of the database) . . ."
>
One of those could be the reasons and then maybe....
> Sara
Regards,
Ed Kadach
Ed Kadach
>
> Ed Kadach wrote:
>
> > Buck Turgidson wrote:
> > >
> > > So how was your 12-hour R&R, Gutless?
> > >
> > > -- --Dep
> >
> > Who can hardly blame him when he's advised that a Yale F. Edeiken
> > mailing list recipient has once again posted private information
> > along with hints of causing him harm or duress.
> >
> > Ed Kadach
>
> You mean he's so psycho that he hasn't bothered to change his phone
> number? Have you changed your phone number, Eddie? It's not hard to
> do. Even you and Scottikins could probably do it.
>
> Steve
No, I haven't changed my two phone numbers yet and don't intend to.
And, there are two good reasons for that.
Regards,
Ed Kadach
Ed Kadach
>
> Philip Mathews wrote:
>
> > In >Message-id: <38EFA9...@connect.ab.ca>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > >>
> > >> > Orac wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> > >> > > <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
> > >> > >
> > >> > > He has to. No one else does.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> > >> >
> > >> > That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
> > >> > people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
> > >> > his actions.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > Racialist regards,
> > >> > Ed Kadach
> > >>
> > >> Re--oh, you know.
> > >>
> > >> -- --Dep
> > >
> > >
> > >coming to the aid of a problematic lunatic such as Yale.
> >
>
>
> Steve
My error has been pointed out to me by two or three of you
already. As I said it was a little slip between the hip and
the lip.
Regards,
Ed Kadach
Doc Tavish
On 9-Apr-2000, Ed Kadach <edd...@connect.ab.ca> wrote:
> Orac wrote:
> >
> > In article <38EF6A...@connect.ab.ca>, edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
> >
> > >Orac wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> > >> <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > >> >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
> > >> He has to. No one else does.
If that were true I'd be ignored. Actually I see very much time and effort being
spent by those on your side of the political fence doing everything possible
to smear, malign, discredit etc me! Looks like a whole bunch of you take
me very seriously! Ask your pal Yale F. Edeiken if he takes me seriously! :-)
Doc Tavish
> > >That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
> > >people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
> > >his actions.
> > Name one.
>
>
> Me!!
A big THANK YOU.
> Regards,
> Ed Kadach
Ed Kadach
>
> On 9-Apr-2000, Ed Kadach <edd...@connect.ab.ca> wrote:
>
> > Orac wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <38EF6A...@connect.ab.ca>, edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
> > >
> > > >Orac wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> > > >> <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > >> >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
>
> > > >> He has to. No one else does.
>
> If that were true I'd be ignored. Actually I see very much time and effort being
> spent by those on your side of the political fence doing everything possible
> to smear, malign, discredit etc me! Looks like a whole bunch of you take
> me very seriously! Ask your pal Yale F. Edeiken if he takes me seriously! :-)
>
> Doc Tavish
If Yale doesn't take you seriously yet, I'm betting
he will be in a very short time.
Ed
Yale F. Edeiken
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cp4u...@news2.newsguy.com...
> From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
> Newsgroups:
alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism
> Subject: Evidence that Doc Tavish Is An Idiot
> Organization: Concentric Internet Services
> Message-ID: <catamont-080...@ts018d06.den-co.concentric.net>
> On 8-Apr-2000, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>
> > In article <8cofa...@news2.newsguy.com>, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com
> > wrote:
> > [Tavish drivel snipped]
> >
> > Public domain, Idiot.
> >
> > I didn't care one way or another about your fantasy plane. That
> > information was e-mailed to me by a total stranger.
>
> > Send that certified check yet? Or do you want to say "bench warrant"
instead?
>
> More evidence that you have more than a casual interest in my personal
life!
Naaaj. Like all of your victims she is amused at the spectacle of a
court ordering you to pay me to sue you.
> Care to provide even more you squealing little piglet?
Care to get that certified check in the mail, asshole?
Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
charactiture of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his
basically incoherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a
notorious liar and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by utter
dishonesty and include such criminal activities as forging the posts of
others and issuing death threats. He has threatened one person who exposed
his lies with sexual molestation, torture, death and mutilation. There is,
of course, not a word of truth in the venom he spews so freely.
--YFE
The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
Yale F. Edeiken
Defendant Tavish <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cr32...@news2.newsguy.com...
> > > >> In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> > > >> <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > >> >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
>
> > > >> He has to. No one else does.
> If that were true I'd be ignored.
Nope. No one takes a cockroach seriously/
> Actually I see very much time and effort being
> spent by those on your side of the political fence doing everything
possible
> to smear, malign, discredit etc me!
By telling the truth about you.
Looks like a whole bunch of yo>u take
> me very seriously! Ask your pal Yale F. Edeiken if he takes me seriously!
:-)
/I take you as seriously as a picador takes a bull. And for the same
reason.
Steve Wolk
If you say so, Ed, I'll accept that. But how about Scottikins?
Steve
Buck Turgidson
> Orac wrote:
> >
> > In article <38EFA9...@connect.ab.ca>, edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
> >
> > >It doesn't say much about all you anti-exterminationists
> > >coming to the aid of a problematic lunatic such as Yale.
> >
> > Wouldn't the "anti-exterminationists" be you and Scotty?
>
> Yes, that is correct, my error has already been pointed out to
> me by one of your buddies. Can't remember if it was Mock or
> Mathews or Murphy. The Three Musketeers!
'Twas not I. As you know, nitpicking of that nature is beneath me. (By the by,
did you know your first sentence is a run-on? ;D )
-- --Dep
"Always tell the truth. It's the § "Truth is just...truth. You can't
easiest thing to remember." § have opinions about truth."
--David Mamet --Peter Schickele
Like short-haired women? Snotty comments? Penguins?
http://members.aol.com/deppitybob/shlu/PAGEONE.html
Orac
wrote:
>Another example of witty repartee from the racists.
>
>*yawn*
It never ceases to amaze me how low they'll go. Pathetic.
>On Sat, 08 Apr 2000 20:38:02 -0700, Brimstone
><mr_brimsto...@excite.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Doc, Sara wants you to come watch her screw the dogs.
>>
>>
>>
>>Brimstone
>>
>>* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
>>The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
>>
>
>"Business?!? *mankind* was my business!!"
>-The ghost of Jacob Marley to Scrooge "A Christmas Carol"
>By Charles Dickens
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
Orac
wrote:
>Ed Kadach wrote:
>
>> Orac wrote:
>> >
>> > In article <38EFA9...@connect.ab.ca>, edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
>> > >It doesn't say much about all you anti-exterminationists
>> > >coming to the aid of a problematic lunatic such as Yale.
>> >
>> > Wouldn't the "anti-exterminationists" be you and Scotty?
>>
>> Yes, that is correct, my error has already been pointed out to
>> me by one of your buddies. Can't remember if it was Mock or
>> Mathews or Murphy. The Three Musketeers!
>
>'Twas not I. As you know, nitpicking of that nature is beneath me. (By the
>by,
>did you know your first sentence is a run-on? ;D )
Personally, I was hoping for some spelling errors to correct. :-)
Orac
>Orac wrote:
>>
>> In article <38EF6A...@connect.ab.ca>, edd...@connect.ab.ca wrote:
>>
>> >Orac wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
>> >> <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
>> >>
>> >> He has to. No one else does.
>> >
>> >That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
>> >people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
>> >his actions.
>>
>> Name one.
>
>
>Me!!
That's unfortunate. I'd had a higher opinion of you than of most of the
revisionists around here. Looks like I'll have to lower that opinion...
Derek Bell
:>>> In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
:>>> <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
:>>> >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
:>>> He has to. No one else does.
:>>That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
:>>people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
:>>his actions.
:>Name one.
Dopey.
Derek
--
Derek Bell db...@maths.tcd.ie | Socrates would have loved
WWW: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/index.html| usenet.
PGP: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/key.asc | - J...@bluejo.demon.co.uk
Derek Bell
: Naaaj. Like all of your victims she is amused at the spectacle of a
: court ordering you to pay me to sue you.
The schadenfreude isn't just limited to Tavishes' victims - I too am
greatly amused at the spectacle!
Fledgist
>Fledgist <fled...@aol.comkillspam> wrote:
>:>>> In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
>:>>> <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>:>>> >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
>:>>> He has to. No one else does.
>:>>That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
>:>>people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
>:>>his actions.
>:>Name one.
>: Sneezy.
>
> Dopey.
>
> Derek
>--
You're right!
Ed Kadach
> >
> >> Orac wrote:
> >> >
>
> >> > >It doesn't say much about all you anti-exterminationists
> >> > >coming to the aid of a problematic lunatic such as Yale.
> >> >
> >> > Wouldn't the "anti-exterminationists" be you and Scotty?
> >>
> >> Yes, that is correct, my error has already been pointed out to
> >> me by one of your buddies. Can't remember if it was Mock or
> >> Mathews or Murphy. The Three Musketeers!
> >
> >'Twas not I. As you know, nitpicking of that nature is beneath me. (By the
> >by,
> >did you know your first sentence is a run-on? ;D )
>
> Personally, I was hoping for some spelling errors to correct. :-)
Sorry to disappoint you, but you know what, you can always review
Yale's grammatical errors.
Regards,
Ed
David Gehrig
>
> Fledgist <fled...@aol.comkillspam> wrote:
> :>>> In article <8cnk46$fls$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Dave"
> :>>> <da...@dharbottle.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> :>>> >Tavish you take yourself way too seriously
> :>>> He has to. No one else does.
> :>>That is an absolutely false statement. There are multitudes of
> :>>people (that might be a stretch) that are 100% behind Doc and
> :>>his actions.
> :>Name one.
> : Sneezy.
>
> Dopey.
Goes without saying -- they're all dopey.
@%<
Steve Wolk
and grammatical errors have a cause that has nothing to do with his
knowledge of the language.
Steve
Ed Kadach <edd...@connect.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:38F275...@connect.ab.ca...
Derek Bell
:> Dopey.
: You're right!
I also forgot Grumpy - Tavishs' frequent mood.
Orac
<db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>Fledgist <fled...@aol.comkillspam> wrote:
>:> Dopey.
>: You're right!
>
> I also forgot Grumpy - Tavishs' frequent mood.
Yes, but lately everyone around here seems rather grumpy, revisionists and
anti-revisionists alike...
Fledgist
>Fledgist <fled...@aol.comkillspam> wrote:
>:> Dopey.
>: You're right!
>
> I also forgot Grumpy - Tavishs' frequent mood.
>
>--
You'd be grumpy too if every time you opened your mouth you stuck your foot in
it.
Ed Kadach
>
> Ed, you'll have to take my word for it when I tell you that Yale's spelling
> and grammatical errors have a cause that has nothing to do with his
> knowledge of the language.
>
> Steve
Ok, I'll take your word for it, but this is the last time.
Regards,
Ed Kadach