Yale F. Edeiken, The Coward, Wants My ISP to Pull My Plug For Telling the Truth About Him! I Thought You Believed in Free Speech You Shyster!
Doc Tavish
about Free Speech and First Amendment rights recently? Here he is:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=0WxS6.50%243d.17182%40newshog.newsread.com
From: Yale F. Edeiken (ya...@enter.net)
Subject: Re: Defendant Bradshit Babbles On
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism, alt.liars.shyster-bastards, alt.vermin.liars,
alt.filth
Date: 2001-06-03 14:24:28 PST
[...]
> > Defendnt Bradshit has aadmitted making this death threat here and in
> >court.
> You would be better off refering to me as Mr. Bradbury instead of Defendant
> Bradshit in public.
Wrong, Defendant Bradshit.
We have this little thing in the US called the "First Amendment."
[...]
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Strange people like Yale F. Edeiken say the believe in the "First Amendment"
when it is their speech they are protecting but look at one of many identical
e-mails the obnoxious swine sent to my ISP:
Return-Path: <ya...@enter.net>
Received: from mail2.enter.net (sourcenat1.bigmailbox.com [209.132.220.250])
by mailrecv11.bigmailbox.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f4SFp2d03722
for <doc_t...@my-deja.com> ; Mon, 28 May 2001 08:51:02 -0700
Received: from oemcomputer (mat-1-43.enter.net [207.16.155.53])
by mail2.enter.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f4SFox457056;
Mon, 28 May 2001 11:50:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: ya...@enter.net
Message-ID: <000701c0e78f$692759a0$359b10cf@oemcomputer>
To: <ab...@prodigy.net>
Cc: <doc_t...@my-deja.com>
Subject: Complaint re Scott Bradbury 1/13
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 12:01:07 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attached you will find material recently published on the internet through
your facilities by one of your subscribers, Scott Bradbury of Belleville,
Texas; the headers on this article are complete and demonstrate that the
material originated on a server that you own and operate. The material is
clearly defamatory and, as such, is both actionable and a violation of your
terms of service agreement. Specifically this material states that I, as an
attorney, have fabricated evidence and suborned perjury. Additionally
language in this material constitutes an attempt to intimidate a witness in
on-going litigation. This constitutes a felony in the jurisdiction in which
this person has submitted evidence to a the court and, as such constitutes a
predicate act under the federal RICO statute.
In fact this material represents an a continuing effort by its author and
several of his accomplices to harass and intimidate others as part of a
criminal enterprise as defined by the federal RICO statute. This pattern of
activity has the objective of promoting an anti-Semitic agenda. It has
taken the form of direct criminal harassment of the targeted individuals and
other members of their family, the forgery of material in their names, and
fraudulent complaints made to employers and law enforcement agencies.
As a result of this activity your customer was sued for these activities.
Currently a judgment has been obtained on the question of liability and the
damages are pending before the court. In past complaints to you the caption
of the relevant case has been provided as has the Complaint filed against
Bradbury and admissions that he made during the course of litigation.
Since Bradbury and his accomplices have continued their activities
subsequent to entry of judgment, a Complaint has been prepared pursuant to
the civil provisions of the federal RICO Act naming several people including
Bradbury, a British neo-nazi, and two others as the members of the criminal
enterprise. Additionally two internet providers who have assisted in
disseminating their attempts to harass and intimidate others will be named
as defendants.
I hereby demand that you take whatever steps you deem appropriate to stop
this flow of defamatory and harassing material. Should you continue to
assist in the criminal activities of Bradbury you can and will be added as a
defendant to the impending lawsuit. For that reason, I expect that you will
give prompt attention to the series of complaints which I am forwarding to
you this day.
I look forward to a quick resolution to this problem.
-Yale F. Edeiken
~~End of One Complaint of Nineteen~~
What did I post that drove Yale to the above extreme?
He does not like me posting facts that he was Nazihunter in December 1999
and how he used subpoenaed information to harass me as I proved in this post:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=j2duetkm3dofberosjb69ehpsom5isgrr1%404ax.com
From: CATMAN (cat...@gerfing.com)
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken = nazihunter December 1999 ( Archival Version ) ____
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-05-01 15:53:03 PST
Yale F. Edeiken does not like it that I proved he manufactured evidence and
perjured numerous times as I proved beyond any doubt in these posts using GOOGLE
links to show the entire posts etc. in context:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=ruqqht0c39i6bjvb3qrfcsu2658gbfbldj%404ax.com
From: Doc Tavish (doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM)
Subject: _Doc Tavish's Atomic Bomb aka Perjury and Manufacturing of Evidence.
Yale F. Edeiken Manufactured Lies!_-
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-06-05 16:35:05 PST
Yale you did lie through your teeth and YOU did manufacture evidence! That is
FACT and the above link proves it too! Everyone I showed the material to agrees
with me!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=13&ic=1&selm=fbnugtog60c5akdetkekkgepuv2npur610%404ax.com
From: Ivan Tavishiski (REMOVE-ALL-CAPS-TA...@my-deja.com)
Subject: By Request- More Yale F. Edeiken Lies and Perjury He Presented in a
Sworn Complaint to a Civil Court!
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-05-26 02:04:09 PST
All of the posts fully documented and irrefutable. You can threaten lawsuits all
you want you filthy swine but when your illegal and unethical acts catch up with
you then it will be time to pay the piper. I think you deserve some prison time
and BTW psycho- stop filling my e-mail box with your mentally disturbed
droolings- than can and will be used against you. You can count on it swine!
Don't forget Edeikike- I will keep exposing you for what you are and I will
gladly point out your lies and criminal acts. Hope you go to prison!
Doc Tavish
---
Concerning unethical attorneys and judges in the State of Pennsylvania:
<http://www.clr.org/pa.html> Yale F. Edeiken --Attorney at Law -
Supreme Court ID# 40290 -- See how Yale likes to push women around in this link:
http://www.mcall.com/cgi-bin/slwebsto.cgi?DBLIST=mc90&DOCNUM=39046
(This is a swine who sued me for being violent!!)
Sara
doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM wrote:
[Scott Bradbury's hysterical drivel deleted]
>
> What did I post that drove Yale to the above extreme?
Oh, perhaps all those "pimp" and "criminal" references, perhaps?
Sara
--
"It's always nice to see a prejudice overruled by a deeper prejudice."
John Sayles, _Lone Star_
Doc Tavish
I not only stated it BUT I proved that you manufactured evidence as this link so
plainly shows:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=ruqqht0c39i6bjvb3qrfcsu2658gbfbldj%404ax.com
>Additionally language in this material constitutes an attempt to intimidate a
>witness in on-going litigation.
Your "litigation" is dead in the water. Haven't you figured out yet you mentally
disturbed jerk that your "judgment" was made August 25, 2000 (almost a year ago)
and you have not receive one tribute or one cent? Even a stupid hog like you
should figure out the obvious!
>This constitutes a felony in the jurisdiction in which this person has submitted
>evidence to a the court and, as such constitutes a predicate act under the federal
>RICO statute.
Why won't you tell me the jurisdiction your malicious witness submitted her
evidence? I still want to file perjury charges against her for all the lies she
swore to.
> In fact this material represents an a continuing effort by its author and
>several of his accomplices to harass and intimidate others as part of a
>criminal enterprise as defined by the federal RICO statute. This pattern of
>activity has the objective of promoting an anti-Semitic agenda.
"Promoting an anti-Semitic agenda"? Now we know what you're really trying to do.
You want to shut me up so I won't expose you and your ilk.
> It has taken the form of direct criminal harassment of the targeted individuals and
>other members of their family, the forgery of material in their names,
You have yet to prove I have done one such thing.
> and fraudulent complaints made to employers
What I advised Paul Trainor of was NOT fraudulent.
> and law enforcement agencies.
Every report I have filed has been factual and I have shown all the evidence
such as my fully documented posts and your nut case e-mails as well as your
co-conspirator's death threat web pages and posts. BTW they also have a copy of
the "Yale F. Edeiken = Nazihunter of December 1999" post which I give the link
to further down in this post.
> As a result of this activity your customer was sued for these activities.
So what? People can sue for the most frivolous reasons such as you prove
continually. Here you are running your fat mouth threatening Matt Giwer's ISP
because he spoke the truth about you:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=01bf22ea%249cac6a60%241e9a10cf%40default
From: Yale F.Edeiken (ya...@enter.net)
Subject: Re: The criminal Giwer expands the scope of his lies
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic, alt.revisionism
Date: 1999/10/30
Artiq <A...@r.tiq> wrote in article <38418753.126001976@news-server>...
> alt.revisionism removed to demonstrate the scum who want to
> invite spam from SWC like Yale.
Alt.revisionism restored. It is a lie that the spam originated from
SWC.
It is a lie that it still is occuring.
> Is there anyone still dumb enough to claim the holohuggers are
> not the spam inviters?
Are there people so stupid that they beleive a singlke word that the
criminal Giwer utters?
And then the criminal Giwer puts his foot in it:
> There is this SHYSTER who CREATED an allegation.
That statment is actionable as defamation.
Does your present ISP realize that you are putting them in jeopardy of a
lawsuit.
> That allegation was of drinking to excess which quite clearly is
> none other than his creation. So he is clearly violation his oath as
> an officer of the court. His oath requires him never to lie but he is
> lying in this matter so he violates his oath of office as an officer
> of the court.
That statement is actionable as defamation.
Does your present ISP realize that you are putting them in jeopardy of a
lawsuit?
> But really I do not believe he is an officer of the court as he
> has posted lies as to drinking on the internet. And no officer of the
> court would post without personal knowledge and he has none.
That statement is actionable as defamation.
Does your present ISP realize that you are putting thme in jeopardyof a
lawsuit?
> Without the least question I RICO common intent and SEVEN years
> to deal with it as a minimum.
Yhat statemetn is actionable as defamation.
Does your present ISP realize that you are puitting them in jeopardy of
a lawsuit?
> And if I do not say that he is a Jew because he says he is Jew
> and not making that profitable activity as he has and is the current
> mode of extorion and theft as did GTE Internet ...
This doesn't even make sense.
> It goes but the facts are clear and criminal.
Correct. Your statements are a continuation of the criminal conduct in
which you engaged.
--YFE
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
You really like bullying people don't you shyster? I am one who is fed up with
you using your connections to the legal system to harass and intimidate people
and their ISPs. YOU'RE THE CRIMINAL!
Yale likes to threaten other people's ISPs with lawsuits but look how he reacts
when he gets the same medicine!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=25&ic=1&selm=37430a08%40news3.enter.net
From: Yale F. Edeiken (ya...@enter.net)
Subject: Re: Thought control" BBSs
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 1999/05/19
>> And what should the "slightly tougher game" be for a lying fuck like you
>> who attempted to bully my ISP with threats of a lawsuit.
<end>
Yale only sent my ISP only nineteen threats of lawsuits between May 23, 2001 to
June 3, 2001. What a hypocrite and what a stupid hog.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=2&ic=1&selm=384189ac%40news3.enter.net
From: Yale F. Edeiken (ya...@enter.net)
Subject: Re: Call Yale Edeiken Late Nights to Discuss
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 1999/11/28
Defendant Tavish <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:A_604.1406$0p4.2...@news.flash.net...
<<Doc Tavish comment June 8, 2001: Notice that Edeiken was still referring to me
as Defendant Tavish on November 28, 1999. Yale issued a subpoena to Flash. Net
on November 30, 1999 and by December 14, 1999 he was calling me Defendant
Bradbury in the same time frame as all of those harassment and death threat
posts!>>
> ---------- Forwarded Message Follows ----------
They will not, Defendant Tavish, because notifying you of defamation,
forging ofd posts, and incitement to criminal harassment is not abuse.
> -- 1
> You're full of it Yale! Where are all of the headers such as you
> see below.
They are unneccesary. The proof is elsewhere.
> I did NOT make that post and I stand my grounds.
All I ghave is your denial. I have serious evidence that it was you.
> I am most sure that Flash Net's technology can prove whether
> or not I made the current post
Then they had better start doing so.
> for which you are whining and
> wailing and e-mailing once more.
Correct. I want you to stop your forgery, defamation, and incitement to
criminal harassment.
You refuse to stoip.
> You are very pitiful in your attempst to make charges. BTW sphincter
>muscle- stop e-mailing me!
Absolutely not.
[...]
> > Anonymous <flash-...@nym.alias.net> wrote in message
> > news:1999110716...@p3E9EDA51.dip0.t-ipconnect.de...
> >
> > Yale F. Edeiken, ZHID, of [address snipped] wants lots of late night callers,
> > and will even welcome visitors, late nights,
> > to discuss the Holohoax.
> >
> > He can be reached at [telephone number snipped]
> > He even likes discusssing, and even meeting
> > with niggers, and others to discuss matters.
> >
> > -88-
> The above is a direct death threat from your pet nazi.
>
> I realize you have neither the intelligence or honesty to reply but I
> wish to make sure that when the legal papers start flying that you will not
> be able to claim that you were not given an opportunity to act.
>
> --Yale F. Edeiken
It is absoluitely outrageous that in in denying yourr obvious
culpability, you repeat the offending post in its entirety including the
address and telephone number.
THIS POST ALONE proves your support of a criminal conspiracy.
Stop it now. You are already a Defendant in a civl action based upon
your forgeries, death threats, defamation, and incitement to commit criminal
acts.
` All you are doing by the act of reprinting a threat to harass me like
this from a private email does nothing more than build the punitice damages
and, as I indicated in the e-mail to ab...@flash.net involve them in your
legal problems.
--YFE
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Those double standards just keep coming back to bite your fat ass!
>Currently a judgment has been obtained on the question of liability and the
>damages are pending before the court. In past complaints to you the caption
>of the relevant case has been provided as has the Complaint filed against
>Bradbury and admissions that he made during the course of litigation.
You keep forgetting, you stupid hog, I made no admissions and yet you keep lying
through your teeth.
> Since Bradbury and his accomplices have continued their activities
>subsequent to entry of judgment, a Complaint has been prepared pursuant to
>the civil provisions of the federal RICO Act naming several people including
>Bradbury, a British neo-nazi, and two others as the members of the criminal
>enterprise. Additionally two internet providers who have assisted in
>disseminating their attempts to harass and intimidate others will be named
>as defendants.
>
> I hereby demand that you take whatever steps you deem appropriate to stop
>this flow of defamatory and harassing material. Should you continue to
>assist in the criminal activities of Bradbury you can and will be added as a
>defendant to the impending lawsuit. For that reason, I expect that you will
>give prompt attention to the series of complaints which I am forwarding to
>you this day.
>
> I look forward to a quick resolution to this problem.
I hope they tell you to drop dead and stop bugging them with your nut case
complaints which have no basis in reality. Doc Tavish
Here are more posts which Yale F. Edeiken does not like posted. Perhaps everyone
else should take this as a clue to what their postings should be in the future!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=8a3lhtskis86h57henuccjm7kmrmlg7vvq%404ax.com
From: Ivan Tavishiski (REMOVE-ALL-CAPS-TA...@my-deja.com)
Subject: Why Won't Yale F. Edeiken Deal With Child Molestation Done in the Name
of Religion? aka Re: Will Scott Bradbury ever stop making his lawyer cry?
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism, soc.culture.jewish, soc.culture.usa
Date: 2001-06-03 12:28:03 PST
It drives Yale out of his mind for non-Jews to find out about how Rabbis "suck
the wound" after circumcising and infant penis! I wonder if the Mohel sucks the
wound of a convert who is twenty one years old or older? Perhaps he will tell
us!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=3&ic=1&selm=s1dihtc3ql71cqiq57ot8qpljn55o6edh0%404ax.com
From: Ivan Tavishiski (REMOVE-ALL-CAPS-TA...@my-deja.com)
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken, Dogs, and the Talmud...)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-06-02 11:51:03 PST
Yale doesn't like the Talmud discussion posted in which dogs having sex with
Jewish maidens is discussed by Rabbinical sages!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=2&ic=1&selm=ht0jhtk0uht2kcu7k5n1ck06kodgegkn1n%404ax.com&filter=0
From: Ivan Tavishiski (REMOVE-ALL-CAPS-TA...@my-deja.com)
Subject: Jewish Propagation of Socialism/Communism and Their Cloaked Hatred and
Bigotry Toward Non-Jews (Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken - Neo-Bolshevist)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism, soc.culture.palestine, soc.culture.usa,
alt.politics.nationalism.white, soc.culture.polish, soc.culture.ukrainian
Date: 2001-06-02 17:28:13 PST
Yale definitely hates Jews being linked to communism- that is FACT!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=12&ic=1&selm=qt0jht4haaheki6m5krm480gr6r0cot9ks%404ax.com&filter=0
From: Ivan Tavishiski (REMOVE-ALL-CAPS-TA...@my-deja.com)
Subject: Group Fantasies and Jewish Radicalism by Stanley Rothman
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism, soc.culture.palestine, soc.culture.usa,
alt.politics.nationalism.white, soc.culture.polish, soc.culture.ukrainian
Date: 2001-06-02 17:28:13 PST
Of the above post- here is what the raging hog had to say:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=O8yS6.54%243d.18109%40newshog.newsread.com
From: Yale F. Edeiken (ya...@enter.net)
Subject: Re: Group Fantasies and Jewish Radicalism by Stanley Rothman
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism, soc.culture.palestine, soc.culture.usa,
alt.politics.nationalism.white, soc.culture.polish, soc.culture.ukrainian
Date: 2001-06-03 14:40:12 PST
> > The remainder of this delusional and dishonest post from the diseased mind
> >of Scott Bradbury (doc_t...@my-deja.com) writing under the name of "Doc
> >Tavish" is deleted as the garbage that it is.
> Can't deal with the truth about your kind can you vermin? Here it is again and
> to your shame:
What you refer to as truth is a pack of lies propagated by deluded
bigots such as yourself and used as an excuse toi kill and persecute.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Strange Yale would refer to another Jew as a bigot!
Need I say more about the mentally disturbed hypocrite known as
Yale F. Edeiken?
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
news:v7m2it017pi88fn3a...@4ax.com...
Complaining about your defamation.
Defamation is not protected by the First Amendment.
Complaining about your threats and intimidation of a witness.
Threats are not protected by the First Amendment.
Please try to tell the truth for once in your misbegottem like.
Readers will note that I made no complaint about Defendant Bradshit's
politics but only his illegal and actiuonable material -- none of which is
covered by the First Amendment.
Once more we have a perfect example of Defendant Bradshit making
fraudulent claims.
> What did I post that drove Yale to the above extreme?
> He does not like me posting facts that he was Nazihunter in December 1999
What I object to is lies like that one.
It's odd to watch Bradbury bellow,
For he's really a cowardly fellow.
Though he tries to act tough
With threats, bluster, and bluff
His belly's a deep shade of yellow.
The remainder of this delusional and dishonest post from the diseased mind
of Scott Bradbury (doc_t...@my-deja.com) writing under the name of ""Doc
Tavish"" is deleted as the garbage that it is. This garbled rant contains
material that, as the author knows or should know is factually inaccurate.
As a result this publication is defamatory. An immediate retraction and
apology is hereby demanded.
Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-known for his tortured
perversion of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his barely
coherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a notorious liar
and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by utter dishonesty and
include such criminal activities as forging the posts of others and issuing
death threats. He has threatened one person who exposed his lies with sexual
molestation, torture, death and mutilation. There is, of course, not a word
of truth in the venom he spews so freely.
For a refutation of this and his other lies about the Talmud and Judaism
consult:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/
--YFE
The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
> On Sat, 09 Jun 2001 00:03:35 GMT,
<v7m2it017pi88fn3a...@4ax.com>
> Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote:
>
> >Additionally language in this material constitutes an attempt to
intimidate a
> >witness in on-going litigation.
> Your "litigation" is dead in the water.
Hardly. There is a judgemtn on the books against you.
> Why won't you tell me the jurisdiction your malicious witness submitted
her
> evidence? I still want to file perjury charges against her for all the
lies she
> swore to.
Lehigh County, Pennsylvania dipshit.
Now when are you going to file something?
> > In fact this material represents an a continuing effort by its author
and
> >several of his accomplices to harass and intimidate others as part of a
> >criminal enterprise as defined by the federal RICO statute. This pattern
of
> >activity has the objective of promoting an anti-Semitic agenda.
>
> "Promoting an anti-Semitic agenda"? Now we know what you're really trying
to do.
Yes. Stop your illegal activities.
> > It has taken the form of direct criminal harassment of the targeted
individuals and
> >other members of their family, the forgery of material in their names,
> You have yet to prove I have done one such thing.
Od course I have Defendant Bradshit.
You admitted it.
What is admitted need not be proved.
> > and fraudulent complaints made to employers
>
> What I advised Paul Trainor of was NOT fraudulent.
You are a liar.
> > and law enforcement agencies.
> Every report I have filed has been factual
You are a liar.
It's odd to watch Bradbury bellow,
For he's really a cowardly fellow.
Though he tries to act tough
With threats, bluster, and bluff
His belly's a deep shade of yellow.
The remainder of this delusional and dishonest post from the diseased mind
of Scott Bradbury (doc_t...@my-deja.com) writing under the name of ""Doc
Doc Tavish
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
>news:v7m2it017pi88fn3a...@4ax.com...
>> Attention one and all: Wasn't Yale F. Edeiken the one who shot his mouth
>> off about Free Speech and First Amendment rights recently? Here he is:
[...]
>> Return-Path: <ya...@enter.net>
>> Received: from mail2.enter.net (sourcenat1.bigmailbox.com
>[209.132.220.250])
>> by mailrecv11.bigmailbox.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id
>f4SFp2d03722
>> for <doc_t...@my-deja.com> ; Mon, 28 May 2001 08:51:02 -0700
>> Received: from oemcomputer (mat-1-43.enter.net [207.16.155.53])
>> by mail2.enter.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f4SFox457056;
>> Mon, 28 May 2001 11:50:59 -0400 (EDT)
>> From: ya...@enter.net
>> Message-ID: <000701c0e78f$692759a0$359b10cf@oemcomputer>
>> To: <ab...@prodigy.net>
>> Cc: <doc_t...@my-deja.com>
>> Subject: Complaint re Scott Bradbury 1/13
>> Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 12:01:07 -0400
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="iso-8859-1"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> X-Priority: 3
>> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Attached you will find material recently published on the internet
>> through your facilities by one of your subscribers, Scott Bradbury...
>> this material states that I, as an attorney, have fabricated evidence and
>> suborned perjury.
Which I proved with these posts:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=ruqqht0c39i6bjvb3qrfcsu2658gbfbldj%404ax.com
From: Doc Tavish (doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM)
Subject: _Doc Tavish's Atomic Bomb aka Perjury and Manufacturing of Evidence.
Yale F. Edeiken Manufactured Lies!_-
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-06-05 16:35:05 PST
Yale you did lie through your teeth and YOU did manufacture evidence! That is
FACT and the above link proves it too! Everyone I showed the material to agrees
with me!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=13&ic=1&selm=fbnugtog60c5akdetkekkgepuv2npur610%404ax.com
From: Ivan Tavishiski (REMOVE-ALL-CAPS-TA...@my-deja.com)
Subject: By Request- More Yale F. Edeiken Lies and Perjury He Presented in a
Sworn Complaint to a Civil Court!
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-05-26 02:04:09 PST
[...]
>> This pattern of activity has the objective of promoting an anti-Semitic agenda.
<end>
>
> Readers will note that I made no complaint about Defendant Bradshit's
>politics
What did you state in all of your spam kook e-mail to my ISP you stupid shyster?
Look above. Care to deny you wrote the above? I saved all copies of your e-mails
too. For a bastard who is bound by a written agreement and by law to keep fro,m
making direct contact with me you surely are showing how you think you're above
the laws and codes you're bound by.
>but only his illegal and actiuonable material -- none of which is
>covered by the First Amendment.
Your making death threats like those you posted December 14 & 15th, 199 along
with your illegal harassment telephone call is illegal and criminal and as for
actionable material- your continually posting your spam is filled with it.
> Once more we have a perfect example of Defendant Bradshit making
>fraudulent claims.
You're the fraudulent one. I show proof, all headers, links, full context of
what you said and do and you do the opposite. You're a liar and a criminal
perjurer among being a stupid bastard.
>> What did I post that drove Yale to the above extreme?
>> He does not like me posting facts that he was Nazihunter in December 1999
> What I object to is lies like that one.
YOU, yes YOU, were the only party in possession of my identity, telephone
number, and address which you had just received using a subpoena you issued
November 30, 1999. You stopped calling me Defendant Tavish at the same time
you posted as nazihunter on the night of December 14, 1999! You were nazihunter
and your own affidavit shows you identifying yourself as nazihunter. Care to
deny you submitted as worn evidence the following?
<start>
(Edited for brevity)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=j2duetkm3dofberosjb69ehpsom5isgrr1%404ax.com
From: CATMAN (cat...@gerfing.com)
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken = nazihunter December 1999 ( Archival Version ) ____
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-05-01 15:53:03 PST
COMPLAINT
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
[...]
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<end>
1) Who identified himself as the Plaintiff?
2) Who claimed that he was threatened when I posted these words as he
stated them in his "complaint": <I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." :-) Sleep on that a whil "nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing
Time is on His Side">
Before I ask the third question I want to make sure you know the answers
to 1 & 2. Do you? Everyone I've showed this to has answered:
Yale F. Edeiken
3) Who did I address my remark to as a matter of legal fact? I state such
in my reply to which Yale F. Edeiken charged: "On December 18, 1999,
Defendant published the following threat to Plaintiff:"?
I addressed as shown in my reply- "nazihunter" YET Yale F. Edeiken charges
that I threatened him! Now I ask:
a) Who claimed to be threatened by me? <Yale F. Edeiken>
b" Who was I, in fact, replying to? <nazihunter>
4) Is it not logical to conclude that Yale F. Edeiken was nazihunter on
the night of December 14th? Everyone of sound mind and reasoning thinks
so!
Here is the post and how I replied in actual context:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded..
Date: 12/18/1999
Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
On 15-Dec-1999, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
> It seems that ever since Tavish's address was published, he
> seems to have disappeared.
> Has he fled?
> Or, better yet, has someone paid him a visit?
I'm standing behind you with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded
slowly squeezing the trigger for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-)
Sleep on that a while "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<END>
Did Yale F. Edeiken or did he not implicate himself as being:
"nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>?
Did "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> post this just the night before?
From: "nazihunter"
Subject: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Anonymously posted.
The following is the address for Doc Tavish
Scott Bradbury
<address and telephone number deleted>
Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
<END>
Did another attorney named Paul Tauger post this concerning posts such as
the above:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Tauger=&rnum=1&seld=935748656&ic=1
"Posting someone's name, address and telephone number, along with an
invitation to visit them with baseball bats sounds fairly close to recent
case in which an a prolife group posted the names of doctors who performed
abortions along with what the court found was tantamount to an invitation
to murder them." Paul Tauger - Attorney January 23, 2001
Here is more about Yale F. Edeiken's activities on December 14, 1999:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=digsig=&rnum=3&seld=916586043&ic=1
Now take note of the following post from Yale F. Edeiken himself:
Concerning being arrested:
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: We Want Porn Please Add Us to Your Lists!
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <3856...@news3.enter.net>
References: <82rla9$f...@sirius.infonex.com>
<82s6km$444$2...@dosa.alt.net>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-4-5.enter.net
X-Trace: 14 Dec 1999 14:38:06 -0500, atmax-4-5.enter.net
[... more false accusations linking to an anonymous post deleted]
You will be interested to learn that a civil suit has already been
filed and a warrant for his arrest is about to be issued.
--YFE
~~End of Post~~
Did everyone notice the time and date the post was archived originally by
DejaCom? It was: Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
The above post as well as the posts which follow were all archived in
a very short time frame by DejaCom. Notice in the following posts you see
my name being forged and also my telephone number and address being posted
along with the mention of me being arrested! Now I ask what are the odds
that another person just would happen to obtain my unlisted telephone
number and address and at the same time be posting it to USENET announcing
I am going to be arrested. Once again Yale F. Edeiken engaging in criminal
harassment!
From: "Bradbury MacTavish" <anon...@cotse.com>
Subject: Tavish's widdle dickie needs a lickin
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com>
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa
Anonymously posted.
Hello to all of my friends and fans out there! Once again,
as the holidays approach, my widdle dickie feels the need
of your attention.
Won't you come and visit my widdle dickie, before Bubba
makes me his and his alone, like before I get arrested?
I live at <address and telephone number deleted>, but
if you are not able to put your lips on widdle dickie in
person, call me for phone sex, at <address and telephone
number deleted> and we'll get it on...
----------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:28:32 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <1999121501...@cotse.com>
From: "Scott Bradbury" <anon...@cotse.com>
Subject: Please suck my tiny dick as a holiday gift
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Lines: 27
Anonymously posted.
My name is Scott Bradbury ..... my adoring and sometimes
sniveling fans know me as "Doc Tavish."
I have a difficult problem. I am about to be arrested,
which means only this guy named Billy Bob will be sucking
my tiny dick.
I don't know when I'm going to be jailed, but the warrant's
been issued... even my close friend and sometimes-lover Fat
Harold won't be able to cuddle my tiny dick then...
Will you show your affection now, by sucking my tiny dick
before I am arrested?
I live in Texas, you know..... where we grow really big
mouths and really small dicks. I live at <address and
telephone number deleted> if you can't suck my tiny dick in
person, can we have phone sex instead? I sure hope so,
because you won't be able to reach me at <address and
telephone number deleted> much longer!
--------------------------------------------------------------
Remember the two posts above mention me being arrested in addition to
giving out my unlisted telephone number and address! What are the odds
that a separate person from Yale F. Edeiken would be posting my unlisted
telephone number and address in addition to announcing I was going to be
arrested? Notice the time and dates of the archival process!
All of the above criminal harassment happened because a mentally disturbed
attorney obtained my unlisted address and unlisted telephone number by use
of a subpoena as shown here:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading:
Yale F. Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding:
"(1) Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net.. This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290.. November 30,1999 Return address: Yale F. Edeiken, 918 North Bayard
Street; Allentown, PA 18104." (Subpoena on file with my attorney, Flash
Net, and law enforcement) [For the record the subpoena does NOT appear on
the docket- rather my confidential info went directly to one of
Yale F. Edeiken's "drops."]
Yale F. Edeiken had a subpoena issued on November 30,1999 and sent it from
Allentown, Pennsylvania to Flash Net in Dallas, Texas. The travel time and
turnaround would be reasonable to assume that Yale F. Edeiken received
my confidential info on about December 14, 1999! I ask what are the odds
that another person other than Yale F. Edeiken would be using the COTSE
anonymizer in a small time frame on the night of December 14, 1999 to
violate my right to privacy!? Yale F. Edeiken did in FACT identify himself
as the plaintiff and that the plaintiff was threatened (personally) when I
replied to "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>.
[...]
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH
Date: 12/16/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Fergus McClelland <re...@perdrix.demon.co.uk > wrote in message
news:Y59ZOCTA79oElx...@4ax.com...
> kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
> >In article <38585078...@mindspring.com>,
> >Buck Turgidson <depnos...@YOmindspriing.conOY> wrote:
> >>C'mon, Nazihunter, fair's fair. What's your name and where do you live?
> >>Sauce for the goose, you prick.
> >To be fair, one should also ask how nazihunter got the name and
> >address in the first place, shouldn't one?
> Yes.
> >Yale Edeiken distributed it to a holocaust-history.org mailing list,
> >and to a few, including me, outside the list. If you are going to
> >condemn nazihunter, as you properly are, then should you not also ask
> >what Yale hoped to achieve by distributing the address in the first
> >place?
> Yes.
To assit others who were the victims of his criminal behavior. This
included all but one person who received the address.
[...]
> Nazihunter has no such mitigation.
Then obviously you know who he is since you are sure that he has not
received death threats from Bradbury or that Bradbury has not filed false
police reports about him.
If so, it's time to fees up.
--YFE
~~End of DejaCom Archival Extract Contained in new GOOGLE Archive~~
New revelations on March 17, 2001 concerning the above:
1) Regarding the statement: "To be fair, one should also ask how
nazihunter got the name and address in the first place, shouldn't one?"
The question is finally answered in the next set of proofs from
Yale F. Edeiken's "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT AND ADMISSIONS ARE DEEMED
ADMITTED", being propagated as TRUTH, in which he "admits" he was
"nazihunter" in December 1999!
2) Regarding the statement: "If you are going to condemn nazihunter, as
you properly are, then should you not also ask what Yale hoped to achieve
by distributing the address in the first place?"
Seeing how Yale F. Edeiken was "nazihunter" he had hoped to achieve
intimidating me into silence with his death threats and he thought if
enough of his accomplices would post my identity and the personal
information he obtained using a subpoena I would be intimidated into
leaving USENET as others have done when treated similarly. Yale F. Edeiken
as "nazihunter" did post these gloating words a day after his posting my
real name, address, telephone number and the invitation to visit me with
baseball bats: "On 15-Dec-1999, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
It seems that ever since Tavish's address was published, he seems to have
disappeared. Has he fled? Or, better yet, has someone paid him a visit?"
The word "visit" had to be in reference to Yale's incitement that I be
murdered when he posted these words just a day before: "Why not call him
and tell him what a nazi prick he is. Better yet, why not visit him.....
..with a baseball bat."
Clearly an attempt to intimidate me into silence through a criminal death
threat and incitation to murder by other parties! This is how the DA and
law enforcement see the criminal act against me.
3) Regarding Yale F. Edeiken's answer to: "Nazihunter has no such
mitigation" Edeiken replied: "Then obviously you know who he is since you
are sure that he has not received death threats from Bradbury or that
Bradbury has not filed false police reports about him."
How on Earth could I make death threats or file false police reports
against an anonymous criminal who just the day before incited murder
against me? Also why would Yale F. Edeiken be offended about anything I
said about "nazihunter"? It is because Yale F. Edeiken was "nazihunter"!
Yale F. Edeiken had whined numerous times that I had filed false police
reports against him! (But why would he be accusing me of "fil[ing] false
police reports" against nazihunter? In my eyes nazihunter was an anonymous
psychopath at that time but Yale took it personally BECAUSE he had to be
nazihunter in December of 1999!)
LOOK!
NEW ADDITION [March 25, 2001] (and the most damning):
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=fraudulent=&rnum=1&seld=985332729&ic=1
Subject: Re: Gord McFee, Another Phony
Date: 11/13/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Defendant Tavish <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:GK2X3.5759$OQ.8...@news.flash.net...
[...]
And you posted it with an invitation to "reach out and touch someone" aas
well as suggestions that fraudulent complaints be sent to the Allentown
Police Department and that I be harassed with late night telephone calls.
<<Doc Tavish comment March 25, 2001: Notice Yale calling me Defendant Tavish
instead of Defendant Bradbury because he hadn't issued the
November 30, 1999 subpoena to verify my identity. Also note that Yale F. Edeiken
accused me of making: "suggestions that fraudulent complaints be sent to the
Allentown Police Department.." He is the only one to falsely accuse me at that
time of doing such and now compare this to the remark he made concerning
Nazihunter above where he said: "Then obviously you know who he (Nazihunter) is
since you are sure that he has not received death threats from Bradbury or that
Bradbury has not filed false police reports about him.">>
In short, your psoting have made you a defendant in a lawsuit.
~~End of Xrefd GOOGLE Archive~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=police=&rnum=5&seld=946318434&ic=1
Subject: Re: Yale F. Edeiken Shows His Mental State and Honesty (For The
Records Folks)
Date: 01/01/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
(Notice how Yale was threatening me back in Jan 2000)
[...]
> > ..This campaign included calling the police and other attorneys in my area.
Subject: Re: Andrew spams again
Date: 12/21/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:385C747A...@btinternet.com...
> Yale F. Edeiken wrote:
> > > > This campaign included calling the police and
> > > > other attorneys in my area. You did nothing but encourage him.
<END>
Yes, Yale cried and wailed about me allegedly contacting the police in his
area as well as attorneys BUT for a fact- I had not done such at that time
and only within the past few days have I notified the authorities and some
law offices in Allentown showing them factually that Yale F. Edeiken
criminally harasses people! Further proof in the next section!
4) In regard to Yale's statement: "..it's time to fees up."
Yes, you're correct Yale and it is now time for you to be indicted and
convicted for your criminal misuse of the legal system. If I can have you
successfully prosecuted for your brazen criminal acts against me then we
will consider what the future holds for the values of your assets and how
much I am entitled to! As you said criminal: "..it's time to fees up."
Additional information in closing:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=digsig=&rnum=3&seld=912981272&ic=1
Docket details of Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786--
Anyone may obtain the docket for $3.00 and here is how and
partially what it shows:
Andrea Naugle -- Clerk Civil Court
Lehigh County Court House
Room 202
4555 West Hamilton Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1614
and "Request Docket Printout for Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786" and you
will see for yourself among the following:
03-Nov-1999 PRAE FOR SUMMONS
17-Dec-1999 PRAE TO REISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
06-Jan-2000 SHRF RTN SUMMONS... DELIVERY DATE 30-Dec-1999
[...]
25-Apr-2000 Y F Edeiken ESQ's NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA..
[...]
[No subpoena to Flash Net shows! This is FACT! I was not given a chance
either as required by law to object to having my unlisted address and
unlisted telephone number subpoenaed! End of Doc Tavish comment]
From the above one can discern that the subpoena Yale F. Edeiken issued on
November 30, 1999 never made it back to the court house to be entered on the
docket. Yale F. Edeiken had my identity, unlisted telephone number and address
returned to his "drop" at:
Yale F. Edeiken
918 North Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104
Hence the information he obtained never in FACT became public knowledge like he
wants everyone to believe!
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
The above shows the timing, the accessibility of my confidential information,
and only YOU having it!
>It's odd to watch Bradbury bellow,
>For he's really a cowardly fellow.
>Though he tries to act tough
>With threats, bluster, and bluff
>His belly's a deep shade of yellow.
The above childish taunt is all bastard Edeiken when offer when he is edging
closer to losing his legal career and possibly going to prison. I will do my
best to accommodate you Yale!
<deleted defamatory lies Yale has repeated over 300 times>
> --YFE
You're vermin Yale. BTW are still shoving women around?
Scott Bradbury
Sara
<ya...@enter.net> wrote:
> Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
> news:pn63it4rlrfik7hdp...@4ax.com...
> > On Sat, 09 Jun 2001 00:03:35 GMT,
> <v7m2it017pi88fn3a...@4ax.com>
> > Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote:
> >
> > >Additionally language in this material constitutes an attempt to
> intimidate a
> > >witness in on-going litigation.
>
> > Your "litigation" is dead in the water.
>
> Hardly. There is a judgememt on the books against you.
>
> > Why won't you tell me the jurisdiction your malicious witness submitted
> her
> > evidence? I still want to file perjury charges against her for all the
> lies she
> > swore to.
>
> Lehigh County, Pennsylvania dipshit.
>
> Now when are you going to file something?
>
Yep. It sure was submitted in Lehigh County. That's where the Courthouse
is. That's where the Judge is.
Now, as to where it was signed... it's as simple as looking at the
notary's stamp. Of course, if Mr. Bradbury's attorney would turn over
the document to him, he'd know in an instant.
But interestingly enough, his own attorney won't give him the court
documents.
Fascinating, isn't it?
Then again, first Mr. Bradbury claimed there _was no_ affidavit. Then he
claimed it wasn't on the docket. (It isn't, of course, because it's
attached to the papers Mr. Edeiken filed.) Then he claimed the clerk in
Lehigh County "wouldn't give" him a copy. And finally, he claimed that
his own attorney wouldn't give him a copy.
But none of this matters. Mr. Bradbury is going to file charges against
me the same day he sends all his "information" to Joan Snyder: the 5th
of Never.
Yale F. Edeiken
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 01:27:24 GMT,
<02AU6.136$5d.3...@newshog.newsread.com>
> "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>
> >Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
> >news:v7m2it017pi88fn3a...@4ax.com...
> >> Attention one and all: Wasn't Yale F. Edeiken the one who shot his
mouth
> >> off about Free Speech and First Amendment rights recently? Here he is:
and
> >> suborned perjury.
>
> Which I proved with these posts:
Not even YOU beleives that. If you did, you would have run to the
nearest court on your fat little legs.
Instead when given an opportunity to present your garbage in court, you
claimed you were "confined" to your bed.
> >but only his illegal and actiuonable material -- none of which is
> >covered by the First Amendment.
> Your making death threats like those you posted December 14 & 15th, 199
You are a liar.
File a police report to that effect.
You damn well know what would happen if you did.
>
> > Once more we have a perfect example of Defendant Bradshit making
> >fraudulent claims.
> You're the fraudulent one. I show proof, all headers, links, full context
of
> what you said and do and you do the opposite. You're a liar and a criminal
> perjurer among being a stupid bastard.
Walk into a police station and say that.
> > What I object to is lies like that one.
And, Bradshit, I will continue to object.
You are a vicious amoral liar.
What is worse is that ou are a coward as well.
It's odd to watch Bradbury bellow,
For he's really a cowardly fellow.
Though he tries to act tough
With threats, bluster, and bluff
His belly's a deep shade of yellow.