When will Humphrey have the guts to face Tavish in person?
Coffaa
counting the days until he cowardly sneaks into Bellville with 1,000's
of other bicyclist, the question remains.
When will Patrick Lee Humphrey have the guts to face Tavish directly?
He snuck into Bellville a few months ago protecting by over 600 pounds
of female trash (Dale Ann and Psycho Sara Salzman) and a retarded
teenage boy. And even with that, they didn't have the guts to tell
him what day they were coming and cowardly and anonymously took photos
from the across the street to his house, knowing he wasn't home.
You have how many years to visit Tavish directly and refused to do so?
Five? Six? Considering you live only an hour from Tavish, you can't
use that excuse. The truth is, you are afraid to face Tavish directly.
You have to hide either behind bicyclist or morbidly obese women.
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>While Humphrey gets more sexually excited by thinking about Tavish and
>counting the days until he cowardly sneaks into Bellville with 1,000's
>of other bicyclist, the question remains.
Indeed...why is Donald Ray Ellis such a gutless coward?
>When will Patrick Lee Humphrey have the guts to face Tavish directly?
>He snuck into Bellville a few months ago protecting by over 600 pounds
>of female trash (Dale Ann and Psycho Sara Salzman) and a retarded
>teenage boy. And even with that, they didn't have the guts to tell
>him what day they were coming and cowardly and anonymously took photos
>from the across the street to his house, knowing he wasn't home.
No, Sara only made it known in advance when she'd be in Texas...and your lover
Bradbury ran like the 53-year-old baby coward he is. (Sara's son is several
rungs up the evolutionary ladder from *you*, KlanBoy.)
>You have how many years to visit Tavish directly and refused to do so?
>Five? Six? Considering you live only an hour from Tavish, you can't
>use that excuse. The truth is, you are afraid to face Tavish directly.
>You have to hide either behind bicyclist or morbidly obese women.
What's keeping him from waddling his fat ass a block to the county park where
I'll be in 75 days? Could it be that neither one of you have enough spine to
show your faces in public?
75 days, Donnie. Maybe you won't be dragged back to Pine Bluff by then.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <a84f5ab8.04020...@posting.google.com>,
plhumph...@yahoo.com (Coffaa) wrote:
> While Humphrey gets more sexually excited by thinking about Tavish
> and counting the days until he cowardly sneaks into Bellville with
> 1,000's of other bicyclist, the question remains.
>
SNEAKS?!? AS part of the MS ride?!?
They couldn't be more obvious, Donnie.
> When will Patrick Lee Humphrey have the guts to face Tavish
> directly? He snuck into Bellville a few months ago protecting by
> over 600 pounds of female trash (Dale Ann and Psycho Sara Salzman)
> and a retarded
> teenage boy. And even with that, they didn't have the guts to tell
> him what day they were coming and cowardly and anonymously took
> photos from the across the street to his house, knowing he wasn't
> home.
>
> You have how many years to visit Tavish directly and refused to do
> so? Five? Six? Considering you live only an hour from Tavish, you
> can't use that excuse. The truth is, you are afraid to face Tavish
> directly. You have to hide either behind bicyclist or morbidly
> obese women.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQB7x/idySwjCuT94EQKf+QCg7D8JTjRmkqnfQYsyX51xtVxrMZAAoM+b
Z6NX+ZeFt/+UXZ6aIcF93ZFL
=h5D6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
Hank Kimball (County Agent)
plhumph...@yahoo.com (Coffaa) wrote:
>While Humphrey gets more sexually excited by thinking about Tavish and
>counting the days until he cowardly sneaks into Bellville with 1,000's
>of other bicyclist, the question remains.
>
>When will Patrick Lee Humphrey have the guts to face Tavish directly?
>He snuck into Bellville a few months ago protecting by over 600 pounds
>of female trash (Dale Ann and Psycho Sara Salzman) and a retarded
>teenage boy.
One person at the courthouse mistook Sara';s son for a monkey and offered the
lil' booger a banana and Sara The Fist went ballistic!
Patrick and the two pigs are still being talked about too! One person wondered
what sort of accident Sara was in to make her so ugly and I said she has
probably been tortured too much by her husband. I have circulated some of Sara's
S&M Torture Fisting stuff so they can see what sort of miscreants decided to
defile our fine town.
> And even with that, they didn't have the guts to tell
>him what day they were coming and cowardly and anonymously took photos
>from the across the street to his house, knowing he wasn't home.
Stalkers will be stalkers!
>You have how many years to visit Tavish directly and refused to do so?
>Five? Six? Considering you live only an hour from Tavish, you can't
>use that excuse. The truth is, you are afraid to face Tavish directly.
>You have to hide either behind bicyclist or morbidly obese women.
And Dale has gained even more weight as well as Sara The Fist!
One person said Dale's ass looked like two big bowling balls bouncing up and
down out of phase waddling she was waddling in her moo moo.
She is anorexic in this picture compared to what she is now!
<"Thar she blows-- Dale the Whale" http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html>
Tavish
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Hank Kimball (County Agent) wrote
in message <2jvt10dgr7psli8bh...@4ax.com>:
>On 2 Feb 2004 15:32:28 -0800, <a84f5ab8.04020...@posting.google.com>
>plhumph...@yahoo.com (Coffaa) wrote:
>>While Humphrey gets more sexually excited by thinking about Tavish and
>>counting the days until he cowardly sneaks into Bellville with 1,000's
>>of other bicyclist, the question remains.
>>When will Patrick Lee Humphrey have the guts to face Tavish directly?
>>He snuck into Bellville a few months ago protecting by over 600 pounds
>>of female trash (Dale Ann and Psycho Sara Salzman) and a retarded
>>teenage boy.
>One person at the courthouse mistook Sara';s son for a monkey and offered the
>lil' booger a banana and Sara The Fist went ballistic!
And when did Sara's son attack you so you even have that lame
"justification" for this personal attack, blubberbury?
>Patrick and the two pigs are still being talked about too! One person wondered
>what sort of accident Sara was in to make her so ugly and I said she has
>probably been tortured too much by her husband. I have circulated some of Sara's
>S&M Torture Fisting stuff so they can see what sort of miscreants decided to
>defile our fine town.
Suuuuuuuuuuure you have: you even included them in your complaint.
No, wait -- you haven't grown the balls to actually *file* that
complaint yet...
>> And even with that, they didn't have the guts to tell
>>him what day they were coming and cowardly and anonymously took photos
>>from the across the street to his house, knowing he wasn't home.
>Stalkers will be stalkers!
Spoken as one with vast experience staking.
>>You have how many years to visit Tavish directly and refused to do so?
>>Five? Six? Considering you live only an hour from Tavish, you can't
>>use that excuse. The truth is, you are afraid to face Tavish directly.
>>You have to hide either behind bicyclist or morbidly obese women.
>And Dale has gained even more weight as well as Sara The Fist!
So -- was Dale out for your blood, too?
>One person said Dale's ass looked like two big bowling balls bouncing up and
>down out of phase waddling she was waddling in her moo moo.
>
>She is anorexic in this picture compared to what she is now!
And speaking of that, where's my $10k, fatboy?
National Front
>From: Patrick Lee Humphrey pat...@io.com
>Date: 02 Feb 2004 18:01:33 -0600
>Message-ID: <szkd68x...@fnord.io.com>
>Organization: Illuminati Online
>
>
>
>plhumph...@yahoo.com (Coffaa) writes:
>
>>While Humphrey gets more sexually excited by thinking about Tavish and
>>counting the days until he cowardly sneaks into Bellville with 1,000's
>>of other bicyclist, the question remains.
>
>Indeed...why is Donald Ray Ellis such a gutless coward?
>
>>When will Patrick Lee Humphrey have the guts to face Tavish directly?
>>He snuck into Bellville a few months ago protecting by over 600 pounds
>>of female trash (Dale Ann and Psycho Sara Salzman) and a retarded
>>teenage boy. And even with that, they didn't have the guts to tell
>>him what day they were coming and cowardly and anonymously took photos
>>from the across the street to his house, knowing he wasn't home.
>
>No, Sara only made it known in advance when she'd be in Texas...and your
>lover
>Bradbury ran like the 53-year-old baby coward he is. (Sara's son is several
>rungs up the evolutionary ladder from *you*, KlanBoy.)
>
over the last few weeks. Why do you and Sara Salzman want to meet Doc Tavish?
Clearly you two don't like him, so what do you want to talk with him about? To
what end do you want to meet with him? Why didn't you simply knock on his
front door if you want to speak to him so badly?
>>You have how many years to visit Tavish directly and refused to do so?
>>Five? Six? Considering you live only an hour from Tavish, you can't
>>use that excuse. The truth is, you are afraid to face Tavish directly.
>>You have to hide either behind bicyclist or morbidly obese women.
>
>What's keeping him from waddling his fat ass a block to the county park where
>I'll be in 75 days? Could it be that neither one of you have enough spine to
>show your faces in public?
>
You "answered" his question with a question. Why are you being so
evasive? If you hate Doc Tavish, to what end do you and Sara Salzman want to
go by his house?
>75 days, Donnie. Maybe you won't be dragged back to Pine Bluff by then.
>
>--
> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
>
Again: if you and Sara Salzman hate Doc Tavish so much, why do you want
to see him? Why do you hate Doc Tavish so much?
Regards,
NF
--
"Holocaustalism is a religion, a filthy, gutter religion, used to justify and
rationalize the annihilation of Israel's enemies."
--Jim Floyd, August 31, 2001
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <20040202213641...@mb-m03.aol.com>,
nationa...@aol.comNoHoaxes (National Front) wrote:
It's all quite simple, really. I told Mr. Bradbury that I would be in
his area, and wanted to meet him to discuss his continued harassment
of me and my family. He said "any day, any time, my county
courthouse."
So we showed up at his county courthouse, and met the local DA and
the local sheriff, and discussed the situation with them. They were
both sympathetic, and the sheriff's department told us they had "a
name for him, but we don't use it in mixed company."
We called Mr. Bradbury from the courthouse, saying that we were
there, but he had run away from town. So we stopped for lunch, drove
by his house (which is only a few blocks away from the courthouse),
and then left town.
That's all there is to it. Mr. Bradbury spent quite a few months
"being nice" to me online, agreeing that he had been set up by the
likes of Don Ellis and Pat Blakely, but then suddenly had a change of
heart and began attacking me and accusing me of perjury, etc.
All I wanted was to ask him to stop, since asking him in Usenet
wasn't working.
It's reqlly no big deal, except that the DA definitely told us that
he had never met Mr. Bradbury, and Mr. Bradbury had never been in to
see him, which showed us that Mr. Bradbury has lied many, many times
here when he said he was "on a first-name basis" with the DA.
>
> >>You have how many years to visit Tavish directly and refused to
> >>do so? Five? Six? Considering you live only an hour from Tavish,
> >>you can't use that excuse. The truth is, you are afraid to face
> >>Tavish directly. You have to hide either behind bicyclist or
> >>morbidly obese women.
> >
> >What's keeping him from waddling his fat ass a block to the county
> >park where
> >I'll be in 75 days? Could it be that neither one of you have
> >enough spine to
> >show your faces in public?
> >
> You "answered" his question with a question. Why are you
> being so evasive? If you hate Doc Tavish, to what end do you and
> Sara Salzman want to go by his house?
I don't want to go by his house. I drove by it on my way out of town.
Period.
>
> >75 days, Donnie. Maybe you won't be dragged back to Pine Bluff by
> >then.
> >
> >--
> > Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com)
> > Houston, Texas
> > www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston
> > Aeros)
> >
>
> Again: if you and Sara Salzman hate Doc Tavish so much, why
> do you want to see him? Why do you hate Doc Tavish so much?
>
Don't hate him at all. Simply want him to leave me alone, stop
harassing me, and stop posting my address here every time someone
posts the name of his town.
> Regards,
>
> NF
Hope that helps.
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQB8YCCdySwjCuT94EQLS2gCg5No0h6/j2rGpgpA/ZFDAGsVIuPIAnjsA
jNujY6O6r95TePGJosYmtBYt
=GTky
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>In article <a84f5ab8.04020...@posting.google.com>,
> plhumph...@yahoo.com (Coffaa) wrote:
>> While Humphrey gets more sexually excited by thinking about Tavish
>> and counting the days until he cowardly sneaks into Bellville with
>> 1,000's of other bicyclist, the question remains.
>SNEAKS?!? AS part of the MS ride?!?
>They couldn't be more obvious, Donnie.
What terminally confuses Donnie (among the universe of other things that do so
to him) is that I'm sneaking in in plain sight. His one neuron can't handle
that advanced a concept...the result is brainlock.
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>On 2 Feb 2004 15:32:28 -0800, <a84f5ab8.04020...@posting.google.com>
>plhumph...@yahoo.com (Coffaa) wrote:
>>While Humphrey gets more sexually excited by thinking about Tavish and
>>counting the days until he cowardly sneaks into Bellville with 1,000's
>>of other bicyclist, the question remains.
>>When will Patrick Lee Humphrey have the guts to face Tavish directly?
>>He snuck into Bellville a few months ago protecting by over 600 pounds
>>of female trash (Dale Ann and Psycho Sara Salzman) and a retarded
>>teenage boy.
>One person at the courthouse mistook Sara';s son for a monkey and offered the
>lil' booger a banana and Sara The Fist went ballistic!
That's your fantasy, Blubberbury. Remember, there were FIVE witnesses to your
absence that day...one of whom is your county DA, and I doubt he'd much
appreciate your continuing to lie about what he said.
>Patrick and the two pigs are still being talked about too! One person
>wondered what sort of accident Sara was in to make her so ugly and I said she
>has probably been tortured too much by her husband. I have circulated some of
>Sara's S&M Torture Fisting stuff so they can see what sort of miscreants
>decided to defile our fine town.
You weren't anywhere in town, but you know what was said? Houston...we have
K00KSIGN!
>> And even with that, they didn't have the guts to tell
>>him what day they were coming and cowardly and anonymously took photos
>>from the across the street to his house, knowing he wasn't home.
>Stalkers will be stalkers!
...and you are definitely the most psychotic *and* incompetent stalker I've
ever encountered in fourteen years and change of Usenet experience. You have
to beg Donnie to do your stalking for you, for "Bob"'s sake. Sheesh.
>>You have how many years to visit Tavish directly and refused to do so?
>>Five? Six? Considering you live only an hour from Tavish, you can't
>>use that excuse. The truth is, you are afraid to face Tavish directly.
>>You have to hide either behind bicyclist or morbidly obese women.
>And Dale has gained even more weight as well as Sara The Fist!
>One person said Dale's ass looked like two big bowling balls bouncing up and
>down out of phase waddling she was waddling in her moo moo.
That one person was YOU, Austin County Livestock Molester.
>She is anorexic in this picture compared to what she is now!
Only in that dying lump of putrescence that used to be your brain, you mean.
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>>plhumph...@yahoo.com (Coffaa) writes:
>>>While Humphrey gets more sexually excited by thinking about Tavish and
>>>counting the days until he cowardly sneaks into Bellville with 1,000's
>>>of other bicyclist, the question remains.
>>Indeed...why is Donald Ray Ellis such a gutless coward?
>>>When will Patrick Lee Humphrey have the guts to face Tavish directly?
>>>He snuck into Bellville a few months ago protecting by over 600 pounds
>>>of female trash (Dale Ann and Psycho Sara Salzman) and a retarded
>>>teenage boy. And even with that, they didn't have the guts to tell
>>>him what day they were coming and cowardly and anonymously took photos
>>>from the across the street to his house, knowing he wasn't home.
>>No, Sara only made it known in advance when she'd be in Texas...and your
>>lover Bradbury ran like the 53-year-old baby coward he is. (Sara's son is
>>several rungs up the evolutionary ladder from *you*, KlanBoy.)
> I took a brief hiatus from alt.revisionism so maybe I missed a few things
>over the last few weeks. Why do you and Sara Salzman want to meet Doc
>Tavish?
Have one of your superiors google around July 22 of last year. You *can*
count that high, I presume.
>Clearly you two don't like him, so what do you want to talk with him about?
>To what end do you want to meet with him? Why didn't you simply knock on his
>front door if you want to speak to him so badly?
Maybe because he's on record as stating that he'll shoot me if I show up on
his property? I'm obviously not as stupid as Fatbury wants me to be.
>>>You have how many years to visit Tavish directly and refused to do so?
>>>Five? Six? Considering you live only an hour from Tavish, you can't
>>>use that excuse. The truth is, you are afraid to face Tavish directly.
>>>You have to hide either behind bicyclist or morbidly obese women.
>>What's keeping him from waddling his fat ass a block to the county park where
>>I'll be in 75 days? Could it be that neither one of you have enough spine to
>>show your faces in public?
> You "answered" his question with a question. Why are you being so
>evasive? If you hate Doc Tavish, to what end do you and Sara Salzman want to
>go by his house?
We've been by his house, National Runt. He ran away after learning we'd be in
town that day.
>>75 days, Donnie. Maybe you won't be dragged back to Pine Bluff by then.
> Again: if you and Sara Salzman hate Doc Tavish so much, why do you want
>to see him? Why do you hate Doc Tavish so much?
I don't. I'm just one of those people who refuses to be intimidated by a
sixth-grade dropout who grew up to be a Nazikook and Jew hater. (Too bad your
hero offed himself 59 years ago rather than be held accountable for his
actions, but that's what you Nazi-wannabes are all about.)
National Front
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>Organization: Concentric Internet Services
>Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 20:40:10 -0700
>Message-ID: <catamont-995F30...@news-60.giganews.com>
Sara Salzman wrote:
>It's all quite simple, really. I told Mr. Bradbury that I would be in
>his area, and wanted to meet him to discuss his continued harassment
>of me and my family. He said "any day, any time, my county
>courthouse."
>
I'm not accusing you of being dishonest (I'm not), but could you show us
the post where Doc Tavish wrote: "any day, any time, my county courthouse"?
If it's verifiable, did you make prior arrangements and in writing?
>So we showed up at his county courthouse, and met the local DA and
>the local sheriff, and discussed the situation with them. They were
>both sympathetic, and the sheriff's department told us they had "a
>name for him, but we don't use it in mixed company."
>
I don't believe in being vulgar in front of women and children either.
However, did you make a telephone call to Doc Tavish ahead of time to confirm
the date and time?
>We called Mr. Bradbury from the courthouse, saying that we were
>there, but he had run away from town. So we stopped for lunch, drove
>by his house (which is only a few blocks away from the courthouse),
>and then left town.
I would have put such a meeting in writing and involved a notary public.
If Patrick Humphrey, the self-described "Chief Instigator", wanted to duke it
out with Doc Tavish, doing so on private property with legal papers not holding
each other liable for any sort of damages should have been considered.
Besides, how do you know Doc Tavish didn't have prior plans?
>That's all there is to it. Mr. Bradbury spent quite a few months
>"being nice" to me online, agreeing that he had been set up by the
>likes of Don Ellis and Pat Blakely, but then suddenly had a change of
>heart and began attacking me and accusing me of perjury, etc.
>
I recall reading posts to that effect.
>All I wanted was to ask him to stop, since asking him in Usenet
>wasn't working.
>
Again, I would have put the details of the meeting on an actual piece of
paper so as to avoid any confusion. That's just a polite suggestion and, if
you two are planning on meeting him during an MS bicycle run, couldn't you
write up just such a proposal? I don't sense anything malicious on your part,
but Mr. Humphrey appears to want to get into some sort of mutual combat. I
base that opinion on the ferocity of his (always off-topic) posts, unless he's
merely pulling everyone's leg.
I discovered alt.revisionism after the legal thing with Yale Eideken (sp?)
was already over. Why does Patrick Humphrey hate Doc Tavish with such
intensity? I never read his name in the legal document unless I missed it.
>It's reqlly no big deal, except that the DA definitely told us that
>he had never met Mr. Bradbury, and Mr. Bradbury had never been in to
>see him, which showed us that Mr. Bradbury has lied many, many times
>here when he said he was "on a first-name basis" with the DA.
>
Does not the possibility exist that the DA told you that for reasons that
can easily be speculated on? With my Pro-26 scanner, I was once able to pick
up two city police officers communicating with each other and referring to
blacks as "spades" and "coons" and "niggers" while crusing the town in their
squad cars. If asked, wouldn't the DA deny such things happened for reasons
that are obvious?
Yes, it did clarify your position a little better, but it also raised a
few more questions. As far as the "Chief Instigator" goes, he is absolutely
obsessed with Doc Tavish for reasons he's yet to explain.
Also, thanks for the URLs in the "Who Started the Reichstag Fire?" thread
as I've been going through my collection of WW II books and reading what I can
on the subject. Now if only I can locate transcripts to the trial that
followed THAT would be a fascinating read.
Best,
NF
--
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0%2C1283%2C40669%2C00.html
"The lower court found Töben, 56, guilty of offending the memory of the
dead..."
Hank Kimball (County Agent)
<catamont-995F30...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
I wouldn't answer it! Why do I want to hear that fat pig rant and for her to
take my picture?
>It's all quite simple, really. I told Mr. Bradbury that I would be in
>his area, and wanted to meet him to discuss his continued harassment
>of me and my family. He said "any day, any time, my county
>courthouse."
YET you continually leave out this vital part:
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit. I
would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore false
witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the criminal
harassment I have had done to me. I want YOU and Yale to deny causing the
harassment I have been subjected to because of my address being distributed and
the info being used criminally...." <END>
The ONLT reason I stated I would meet your evil lying fat ass at my courthouse
was for the sole purpose stated above! My physical presence was NOT necessary
for the lawsuit to be re-filed.If coward Yale will re-file his perjury here then
I will make my presence available at the courthouse for the trial. As for
hearing a fat slob bitch, rant and wail about her delusions is not something I
care to hear!
>So we showed up at his county courthouse, and met the local DA and
>the local sheriff, and discussed the situation with them.
You didn'[t come for the sole purpose I stated you fat pig!
>They were both sympathetic, and the sheriff's department told us they had "a
>name for him, but we don't use it in mixed company."
That is two falsehoods so far. Not one person said a negative thing about me and
you know it!
>We called Mr. Bradbury from the courthouse, saying that we were
>there, but he had run away from town.
Another lie! I have stated repeatedly I was already out of town when you and
your fellow human debris showed up unannounced.
>So we stopped for lunch, drove by his house
To take pictures!
>(which is only a few blocks away from the courthouse),
>and then left town.
>
>That's all there is to it. Mr. Bradbury spent quite a few months
>"being nice" to me online, agreeing that he had been set up by the
>likes of Don Ellis and Pat Blakely,
Law enforcement cleared them! I have been told anyone with an ISP or has access
to USENET at an ISP level can make posts and e-mailaoppear from anywhere!
>but then suddenly had a change of heart and began attacking me
Because I found out that you were distributing my address etc, behind my back!
>and accusing me of perjury, etc.
Because you distributed Yale's lawsuit which neither my attorney nor myself ever
got to see which gave out my address etc. and which is filled with perjury such
as your affidavit against me!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
>All I wanted was to ask him to stop, since asking him in Usenet
>wasn't working.
>
>It's reqlly no big deal, except that the DA definitely told us that
>he had never met Mr. Bradbury, and Mr. Bradbury had never been in to
>see him,
TWO lIES!!! I helped him run a sting against a shady car painter,
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=m1gmivkv3ktp8qlh3j375tfhttrlaolk36%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Answering Patrick's Lies and Defamation..
Message-ID: <m1gmivkv3ktp8qlh3...@4ax.com>
Date: 2 Aug 2003 04:38:42 GMT
On 01 Aug 2003 21:44:49 -0500, <szkadas...@fnord.io.com> Patrick L.
Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Fortunately for the rest of his county, Bradbury's been enough of a pest to
>have more than a few records of him in his county law enforcement's archives.
Care to attempt to substantiate that smear? The only record on me is when I
assisted the DA in busting a con-artists who was ripping people off. I was wired
for sound and acted like a customer and got the goods on the guy who is no
longer around. Other than me providing evidence for the prosecution there is
nothing else other than I am being harassed along with numerous call traces made
because of death threats.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Notice the date Sara!
I also see DA Koehn at the usual haunts etc.
You also claimed in other posts the DA laughed about me in his talks with you
BUT why would he laugh if he and I never met and why would he denigrate a voter
to a pig like you!? See how easy your lies are to expose you fat stupid slob?
>which showed us that Mr. Bradbury has lied many, many times
>here when he said he was "on a first-name basis" with the DA.
I AM!!! In fact the reason why you showed up was because you knew I was
consulting with him about perjury and how to have out of state perjurious acts
prosecuted! If he never heard of me or knew of me then why did your fat lying
ass get in a panic state and make an over 1800 mile round trip to cover that fat
lying ass!? See how easy it is to expose your lies and smears! Everyone take
note of how honest the holocaust historian is!
>> >>You have how many years to visit Tavish directly and refused to
>> >>do so? Five? Six? Considering you live only an hour from Tavish,
>> >>you can't use that excuse. The truth is, you are afraid to face
>> >>Tavish directly. You have to hide either behind bicyclist or
>> >>morbidly obese women.
>> >
>> >What's keeping him from waddling his fat ass a block to the county
>> >park where I'll be in 75 days? Could it be that neither one of you have
>> >enough spine to show your faces in public?
Two reasons:
1) Why do I want to see a bastard who I despise?
2) Why do I want some nut case to have my picture taken and have it distributed
thus making my life even more endangered. You must think I am as stupid as you
look Patrick!
BTW I am not the waddler but your suck buddy Edeikike is!
~~Yale F. Edeiken is the True Fatboy and Fat Freak~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: My Former Attorney Confirmed Yale F. "Tubby" Edeiken is a Very Obese
Waddler V2.1 Message-ID: <f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com>
Date: 9 Jul 2003 13:58:44 GMT
<<Special Note: It was because of Yale "Tubby" Edeiken that I am continually
insulted with such names as Fatboy, Fat Freak, Blimpie etc. Because he is a
major fat-slob lard ass and because he knew my former attorney gave me the real
goods on what Yale is like as a person- Tubby decided to project his "morbid
obesity" on to me.>>
>> You "answered" his question with a question. Why are you
>> being so evasive? If you hate Doc Tavish, to what end do you and
>> Sara Salzman want to go by his house?
>
>I don't want to go by his house.
BULLSHIT!! You drove by to stop and take pictures. To take Patrick and his pig
home you wouldn't go by my house you would take 36 North and get on I-10 to take
Patrick home.IOW you went out of your way to take pictures of what you and
Patrick have referred to as my "dump" and "shack."
>I drove by it on my way out of town.
>Period.
BULLSHIT!!
>> >75 days, Donnie. Maybe you won't be dragged back to Pine Bluff by
>> >then.
>> >
>> >--
>> > Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com)
>> > Houston, Texas
>> > www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston
>> > Aeros)
>> >
>>
>> Again: if you and Sara Salzman hate Doc Tavish so much, why
>> do you want to see him? Why do you hate Doc Tavish so much?
>
>Don't hate him at all. Simply want him to leave me alone, stop
>harassing me,
You're the one who won't leave me alone and won't stop harassing me!
>and stop posting my address here every time someone
>posts the name of his town.
Tough stuff pig! Every time one of your accomplices posts where I live then I
will retaliate in kind by posting the addresses of the evil shit who denied me
my right to privacy in the first place! Perhaps the next time it happens I just
may cross post to a national socialist news groups or a skinhead group! Who
knows what I may decide. Sooner or later you filth are going to learn you
screwed with the wrong person!
>> Regards,
>>
>> NF
>
>
>Hope that helps.
>
>Sara
Tavish
From: (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Edeiken v. Bradbury: Affidavit
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A2.01
Last-Modified: 2001/02/07
AFFIDAVIT
I, Sara Salzman, being duly sworn, state as follows:
[...]
15. That Daylin Leach refused to act to halt the campaign of harassment
and stated that if Deponent wished to avoid such harassment, that she
should "stop bothering" Defendant Bradbury...
16. That in response to her complaint and concerns for the safety of
her immediate and extended family, Daylin Leach informed Deponent that she
was a "crackpot"... <END>
Now get a life you hysterical crackpot and stop bothering me!
Hank Kimball (County Agent)
Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>One person at the courthouse mistook Sara's son for a monkey and offered the
>>lil' booger a banana and Sara The Fist went ballistic!
>
>That's your fantasy, Blubberbury. Remember, there were FIVE witnesses to your
>absence that day...one of whom is your county DA, and I doubt he'd much
>appreciate your continuing to lie about what he said.
Caught you in still another lie! I NEVER said it was my DA who mistook Ari for a
monkey you dolt!
Tavish
--Criminal Yale F. Edeiken's deplorable record:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
The Disciplinary Board was content to give Yale F. Edeiken a "private reprimand"
but he continued to act like the psychotic nut case he is and defied them and
refused to appear at his hearing more than once! He was then "forced" to appear
and the "private reprimand" had escalated to "PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest
court of that bastard's state! Furthermore the Disciplinary Board closed with:
"It is further ORDERED that respondent [Yale F. Edeiken] shall pay costs to the
Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), PaR.D.E." IOW Yale had to pay the
Disciplinary Board to "kick his shyster ass" AFTER the Disciplinary Board of the
Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania had to serve numerous notices upon
him and compel him to attend his disciplinary hearing!! Yale also had to pay for
all costs of the investigation too! It's all detailed in that PDF file!! GO
LOOK!!
BTW Yale F. Edeiken had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and
Yale had received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995! Then the bastard got "PUBLIC
CENSURE" in 1998!!! Looks like Yale F. Edeiken is real shining example of the
legal profession doesn't it? Why that shyster still has his law license is a
mystery to me! His assaulting a Deputy Sheriff should have done him in- in 1990!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3921e1e6.182032557%40news.newsguy.com&rnum=1
From: doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
Subject: CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <3921e1e6....@news.newsguy.com>
Yale is also a perjurer who also makes criminal death threats using subpoenaed
information:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=bb59tvg62vsljf1rc...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder
Why!.. aka Yale Edeiken Disciplined by The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme
Court of The State of Pennsylvania! NEVER FORGET!! R_1208
Message-ID: <bb59tvg62vsljf1rc...@4ax.com>
Date: 8 Dec 2003 15:15:21 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>On 02 Feb 2004 21:56:54 -0600, <szkhdy8...@fnord.io.com> Patrick Lee
>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>>One person at the courthouse mistook Sara's son for a monkey and offered the
>>>lil' booger a banana and Sara The Fist went ballistic!
>>That's your fantasy, Blubberbury. Remember, there were FIVE witnesses to
>>your absence that day...one of whom is your county DA, and I doubt he'd much
>>appreciate your continuing to lie about what he said.
>Caught you in still another lie! I NEVER said it was my DA who mistook Ari
>for a monkey you dolt!
He didn't say it, Blubberbury. NO ONE did. We were there and you weren't,
remember?
75 days, Lying Fat Slob of Bellville...and where's your proof that you have
$10,000 for your alleged "challenge"?
National Front
>Sender: pat...@fnord.io.com
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>References: <szkd68x...@fnord.io.com>
><20040202213641...@mb-m03.aol.com>>Date: 02 Feb 2004 22:44:45 -0600
>Message-ID: <szkn080...@fnord.io.com>
>Organization: Illuminati Online
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.170.88.12
>
>
>
>nationa...@aol.comNoHoaxes (National Front) writes:
>
>>>plhumph...@yahoo.com (Coffaa) writes:
>
>>>>While Humphrey gets more sexually excited by thinking about Tavish and
>>>>counting the days until he cowardly sneaks into Bellville with 1,000's
>>>>of other bicyclist, the question remains.
>
>>>Indeed...why is Donald Ray Ellis such a gutless coward?
>
>>>>When will Patrick Lee Humphrey have the guts to face Tavish directly?
>>>>He snuck into Bellville a few months ago protecting by over 600 pounds
>>>>of female trash (Dale Ann and Psycho Sara Salzman) and a retarded
>>>>teenage boy. And even with that, they didn't have the guts to tell
>>>>him what day they were coming and cowardly and anonymously took photos
>>>>from the across the street to his house, knowing he wasn't home.
>
>>>No, Sara only made it known in advance when she'd be in Texas...and your
>>>lover Bradbury ran like the 53-year-old baby coward he is. (Sara's son is
>>>several rungs up the evolutionary ladder from *you*, KlanBoy.)
>
>> I took a brief hiatus from alt.revisionism so maybe I missed a few
>things
>>over the last few weeks. Why do you and Sara Salzman want to meet Doc
>>Tavish?
>
>Have one of your superiors google around July 22 of last year. You *can*
>count that high, I presume.
>
what you mean. I'll take a peek later as I'm about to call it a night.
>>Clearly you two don't like him, so what do you want to talk with him about?
>>To what end do you want to meet with him? Why didn't you simply knock on
>his
>>front door if you want to speak to him so badly?
>
>Maybe because he's on record as stating that he'll shoot me if I show up on
>his property? I'm obviously not as stupid as Fatbury wants me to be.
>
I have been told that the laws regarding self-defense on one's own
property in Texas are practically sacred. I see your point: you don't want to
walk onto his property on two feet and leave in a body bag.
>>>>You have how many years to visit Tavish directly and refused to do so?
>>>>Five? Six? Considering you live only an hour from Tavish, you can't
>>>>use that excuse. The truth is, you are afraid to face Tavish directly.
>>>>You have to hide either behind bicyclist or morbidly obese women.
>
>>>What's keeping him from waddling his fat ass a block to the county park
>where
>>>I'll be in 75 days? Could it be that neither one of you have enough spine
>to
>>>show your faces in public?
>
>> You "answered" his question with a question. Why are you being so
>>evasive? If you hate Doc Tavish, to what end do you and Sara Salzman want
>to
>>go by his house?
>
>We've been by his house, National Runt. He ran away after learning we'd be
>in
>town that day.
>
But you wrote the following: "he's on record as stating that he'll shoot
me if I show up on his property." Did you stop at his house or not? Please
stop contradicting yourself.
>>>75 days, Donnie. Maybe you won't be dragged back to Pine Bluff by then.
>
>> Again: if you and Sara Salzman hate Doc Tavish so much, why do you
>want
>>to see him? Why do you hate Doc Tavish so much?
>
>I don't.
Then why do nearly *all* of your posts contain remarks dripping with hate
for Doc Tavish? You sure as heck don't like the guy and, if you don't hate him
as you claim, why not ignore him? How can someone who (as you claim) runs away
from you *also* intimidate you? That doesn't make any sense.
>I'm just one of those people who refuses to be intimidated by a
>sixth-grade dropout who grew up to be a Nazikook and Jew hater.
See my above comment. You've just invented one I've never heard of: the
intimidator who runs away from you. You aren't on lithium, are you?
(Too bad
>your
>hero offed himself 59 years ago rather than be held accountable for his
>actions, but that's what you Nazi-wannabes are all about.)
>
>-
> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
>
I see. "The Chief Instigator" isn't instigating anything at all.
Noooo... nope. Sara Salzman at least made sense and if both parties merely
ignored each other she would consider the problem resolved.
Michael Ragland has issues, but at least he doesn't have a mean bone in
his body (I kinda have a soft spot in my heart for Mike despite his neuroses).
Is there some way that Mr. Ragland can Fed-Ex something to you for your
obsession?
Main Entry: ob·ses·sion
Pronunciation: äb-'se-sh&n, &b-
Function: noun
Date: 1680
1 : a persistent disturbing preoccupation with an often unreasonable idea or
feeling; broadly : compelling motivation <an obsession with profits>
2 : something that causes an obsession
- ob·ses·sion·al /-'sesh-n&l, -'se-sh&-n&l/ adjective
- ob·ses·sion·al·ly adverb
Pronunciation Key
© 2001 by Merriam-Webster, Incorporated
Merriam-Webster Privacy Policy
(Too bad for you that your hero Charles Manson is being held accountable
for his actions, but that's what you obsessed stalker-nazis are terrified of.)
Get help, man.
NF
--
Search engine results for the obsessed:
Are you being stalked? - Safety for Stalking Victims website can save your
privacy and your life
http://www.aware.org/stalkingbook
Wiley Europe::Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession: Psychological ... - ...
Psychology > Clinical Psychology > Forensic > Stalking and Psychosexual
Obsession: Psychological Perspectives for Prevention, Policing and Treatment.
...
http://www.wileyeurope.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0471494585,descCd
-tableOfContents.html
Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession: Psychological Perspectives on ... -
Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession: Psychological Perspectives on Prevention,
Policing and Treatment. Stalking and Psychosexual ...
http://www.psych-books.com/Stalking_and_Psychosexual_Obsession_Psychologic
al_Perspectives_on_Prevention_Policing_and_Treatment_0471494585.html
Wiley::Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession: Psychological ... - ... Wiley >
Psychology > Clinical Psychology > Forensic > Stalking and Psychosexual
Obsession: Psychological Perspectives for Prevention, Policing and Treatment.
...
http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0471494593.html
Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession: Psychological Perspectives on ... -
Booksearch Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession: Psychological Perspectives on
Prevention, Policing and Treatment. Author: Julian ...
http://www.booksearch.nu/0471494585
Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession : Psychological Perspectives ... -
Booksearch Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession : Psychological Perspectives for
Prevention, Policing and Treatment. Author: Julian ...
http://www.booksearch.nu/0471494593
[More results from www.booksearch.nu]
Stalking and psychosexual obsession - ... Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession:
Psychological Perspectives for Prevention, Policing and Treatment provides the
first comprehensive treatment of the topic ...
http://www.psychminded.co.uk/book%20reviews/0402/Stalking%20and%20psychose
xual%20obsession.htm
Amazon.com: Books: Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession ... -
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0471494593?v=glance
Stalking Psychosexual Obsession: New & used books: Find the Lowest ... -
Stalking & Psychosexual Obsession: Psychological Perspectives for Prevention,
Policing & Treatment, Stalking & Psychosexual Obsession: Psychological ...
http://www.fetchbook.co.uk/Stalking_Psychosexual_Obsession.html
NVAA Instructor's Manual: Chapter 22.2. Special Topics, Stalking - ... Like
love obsession stalkers, erotomaniacs attempt to garner self ... known case of
erotomania stalking involved a ... Despite the treatment she received during
her ...
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/assist/instructor/pdf/Chapter22-2.pdf
Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession: Psychological Perspectives ... - Email a
friend about this book, Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession: Psychological
Perspectives for Prevention, Policing and Treatment. Format, Paperback. ...
http://www.booksmatter.com/b0471494593.htm
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <5pau10hu034vhhg1d...@4ax.com>,
"Hank Kimball (County Agent)" <hank_k...@GreenAcresRFD12.net>
wrote:
For the billionth time, how can I re-file something I never filed?
Oh, and here's three words for you to mull over, Mr. Bradbury:
Statute of limitations.
>
> The ONLT reason I stated I would meet your evil lying fat ass at my
> courthouse
> was for the sole purpose stated above! My physical presence was NOT
> necessary for the lawsuit to be re-filed.If coward Yale will
> re-file his perjury here then
> I will make my presence available at the courthouse for the trial.
> As for hearing a fat slob bitch, rant and wail about her delusions
> is not something I
> care to hear!
>
Nope. You invited me, I showed up.
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
>
> >So we showed up at his county courthouse, and met the local DA and
> >the local sheriff, and discussed the situation with them.
>
> You didn'[t come for the sole purpose I stated you fat pig!
>
You're not the boss of me, Mr. Bradbury. I can go anywhere I wish and
speak with anyone I want for any purpose I want. That's called
Democracy.
> >They were both sympathetic, and the sheriff's department told us
> >they had "a name for him, but we don't use it in mixed company."
>
> That is two falsehoods so far. Not one person said a negative thing
> about me and
> you know it!
I know what was said to me, and I have three witnesses to it. You
have nothing.
>
> >We called Mr. Bradbury from the courthouse, saying that we were
> >there, but he had run away from town
>
> Another lie! I have stated repeatedly I was already out of town
> when you and your fellow human debris showed up unannounced.
Prove it, Coward.
>
> >So we stopped for lunch, drove by his house
>
> To take pictures!
There's no law in the US against taking pictures, Mr. Bradbury.
>
> >(which is only a few blocks away from the courthouse),
> >and then left town.
> >
> >That's all there is to it. Mr. Bradbury spent quite a few months
> >"being nice" to me online, agreeing that he had been set up by the
> >likes of Don Ellis and Pat Blakely,
>
> Law enforcement cleared them! I have been told anyone with an ISP
> or has access
> to USENET at an ISP level can make posts and e-mailaoppear from
> anywhere!
They sure can. Like Donnie posted pictures of your house long BEFORE
I ever went to Texas. Remember his little web site? You figured out
that you were being played by them, but suddenly decided you weren't,
because you can't keep a sane thought in your head.
>
> >but then suddenly had a change of heart and began attacking me
>
> Because I found out that you were distributing my address etc,
> behind my back!
No you didn't. Like YOU just said above, ANYONE WITH AN ISP CAN MAKE
POSTS AND E-MAIL APPEAR FROM ANYWHERE. You bought Donnie's lies
because you're a hate-filled lunatic, just like Donnie.
>
> >and accusing me of perjury, etc.
>
> Because you distributed Yale's lawsuit which neither my attorney
> nor myself ever
> got to see which gave out my address etc. and which is filled with
> perjury such
> as your affidavit against me!
Liar.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=
> 0neq10177e kocu8996adgn...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
> Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder
> Why!.. V2.0
> Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
> Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
>
> >All I wanted was to ask him to stop, since asking him in Usenet
> >wasn't working.
> >
> >It's reqlly no big deal, except that the DA definitely told us
> >that he had never met Mr. Bradbury, and Mr. Bradbury had never
> >been in to see him,
>
> TWO lIES!!! I helped him run a sting against a shady car painter,
So he lied when he said he had never met you. You really want to call
your DA a liar?
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=m1gmivkv3ktp8qlh3j375tfhttrl
> aolk36%404 ax.com&rnum=1
> Subject: Answering Patrick's Lies and Defamation..
> Message-ID: <m1gmivkv3ktp8qlh3...@4ax.com>
> Date: 2 Aug 2003 04:38:42 GMT
>
> On 01 Aug 2003 21:44:49 -0500, <szkadas...@fnord.io.com>
> Patrick L. Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >Fortunately for the rest of his county, Bradbury's been enough of
> >a pest to have more than a few records of him in his county law
> >enforcement's archives.
>
> Care to attempt to substantiate that smear? The only record on me
> is when I assisted the DA in busting a con-artists who was ripping
> people off. I was wired
> for sound and acted like a customer and got the goods on the guy
> who is no longer around. Other than me providing evidence for the
> prosecution there is nothing else other than I am being harassed
> along with numerous call traces made
> because of death threats.
What an amusing fantasy!
>
> ~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
>
> Notice the date Sara!
>
> I also see DA Koehn at the usual haunts etc.
>
> You also claimed in other posts the DA laughed about me in his
> talks with you BUT why would he laugh if he and I never met and why
> would he denigrate a voter
> to a pig like you!? See how easy your lies are to expose you fat
> stupid slob?
>
No. You DA had certainly HEARD all about it from his assistant, whom
you claim you told "everything" to.
See how easy it is to refute your babble?
> >which showed us that Mr. Bradbury has lied many, many times
> >here when he said he was "on a first-name basis" with the DA.
>
> I AM!!! In fact the reason why you showed up was because you knew I
> was consulting with him about perjury and how to have out of state
> perjurious acts
> prosecuted!
You have no idea why I showed up, and your lies change nothing.
> If he never heard of me or knew of me then why did your fat lying
> ass get in a panic state and make an over 1800 mile round trip to
> cover that fat
> lying ass!? See how easy it is to expose your lies and smears!
> Everyone take note of how honest the holocaust historian is!
>
So lamy lies in so few lines. No panic state. No 1800 mile round
trip. As Patrick said, I drove from SAN ANTONIO. That's not an 1800
mile round trip, Moron. I had quite a few reasons for being in San
Antonio, none of which are any of your business. And as I made my way
to San Antonio, I publicly stated where I was, so you would have
plenty of time to scurry out of town like a frightened hog.
> >> >>You have how many years to visit Tavish directly and refused
> >> >>to do so? Five? Six? Considering you live only an hour from
> >> >>Tavish, you can't use that excuse. The truth is, you are
> >> >>afraid to face Tavish directly. You have to hide either behind
> >> >>bicyclist or morbidly obese women.
> >> >
> >> >What's keeping him from waddling his fat ass a block to the
> >> >county park where I'll be in 75 days? Could it be that
> >> >neither one of you have enough spine to show your faces in
> >> >public?
>
> Two reasons:
> 1) Why do I want to see a bastard who I despise?
> 2) Why do I want some nut case to have my picture taken and have it
> distributed
> thus making my life even more endangered. You must think I am as
> stupid as you
> look Patrick!
Donnie had ALREADY distributed the picture of your house, Bradbury.
What a short memory you have!
>
> BTW I am not the waddler but your suck buddy Edeikike is!
>
> ~~Yale F. Edeiken is the True Fatboy and Fat Freak~~
> http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=
> f78ogvk6b7 8m28v347rt2j...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
> Subject: My Former Attorney Confirmed Yale F. "Tubby" Edeiken is a
> Very Obese Waddler V2.1 Message-ID:
> <f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com> Date: 9 Jul 2003
> 13:58:44 GMT
> <<Special Note: It was because of Yale "Tubby" Edeiken that I am
> continually insulted with such names as Fatboy, Fat Freak, Blimpie
> etc. Because he is a major fat-slob lard ass and because he knew my
> former attorney gave me the real
> goods on what Yale is like as a person- Tubby decided to project
> his "morbid obesity" on to me.>>
>
> >> You "answered" his question with a question. Why are you
> >> being so evasive? If you hate Doc Tavish, to what end do you
> >> and Sara Salzman want to go by his house?
> >
> >I don't want to go by his house.
>
> BULLSHIT!! You drove by to stop and take pictures. To take Patrick
> and his pig
> home you wouldn't go by my house you would take 36 North and get on
> I-10 to take
> Patrick home.IOW you went out of your way to take pictures of what
> you and Patrick have referred to as my "dump" and "shack."
We recognized it from the PHOTOS DON ELLIS had already posted on a
web site, LIAR.
>
> >I drove by it on my way out of town.
> >Period.
>
> BULLSHIT!!
Keep dreaming, LIAR.
>
> >> >75 days, Donnie. Maybe you won't be dragged back to Pine Bluff
> >> >by then.
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> > Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com)
> >> > Houston, Texas
> >> > www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04
> >> > Houston Aeros)
> >> >
> >>
> >> Again: if you and Sara Salzman hate Doc Tavish so much,
> >> why do you want to see him? Why do you hate Doc Tavish so much?
> >>
> >
> >Don't hate him at all. Simply want him to leave me alone, stop
> >harassing me,
>
> You're the one who won't leave me alone and won't stop harassing
> me!
What a brilliant neener, LIAR.
>
> >and stop posting my address here every time someone
> >posts the name of his town.
>
> Tough stuff pig! Every time one of your accomplices posts where I
> live then I will retaliate in kind by posting the addresses of the
> evil shit who denied me
> my right to privacy in the first place! Perhaps the next time it
> happens I just
> may cross post to a national socialist news groups or a skinhead
> group! Who knows what I may decide. Sooner or later you filth are
> going to learn you screwed with the wrong person!
Thanks for the threat. It all goes into your file.
>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> NF
> >
> >
> >Hope that helps.
> >
> >Sara
> Tavish
>
> From: (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
> Subject: Edeiken v. Bradbury: Affidavit
> Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A2.01
> Last-Modified: 2001/02/07
>
> AFFIDAVIT
> I, Sara Salzman, being duly sworn, state as follows:
>
> [...]
>
> 15. That Daylin Leach refused to act to halt the campaign of
> harassment and stated that if Deponent wished to avoid such
> harassment, that she should "stop bothering" Defendant Bradbury...
> 16. That in response to her complaint and concerns for the
> safety of her immediate and extended family, Daylin Leach informed
> Deponent that she was a "crackpot"... <END>
>
> Now get a life you hysterical crackpot and stop bothering me!
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> __________ _
> Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
> http://www.uncensored-news.com
> <><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source
>
> <><><><><><><><>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQB+nBSdySwjCuT94EQJKpgCdHUohkzxx+bdvr+JJrVaH+VrJW7UAoJlH
HE1tEkOSusp41T4fKMp5gQJA
=wu2j
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <20040202234659...@mb-m03.aol.com>,
nationa...@aol.comNoHoaxes (National Front) wrote:
> >Subject: Re: When will Humphrey have the guts to face Tavish in
> >person? From: Sara Salzman cata...@concentric.net
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
>
> >So we showed up at his county courthouse, and met the local DA and
> >the local sheriff, and discussed the situation with them. They
> >were both sympathetic, and the sheriff's department told us they
> >had "a name for him, but we don't use it in mixed company."
> >
>
> I don't believe in being vulgar in front of women and children
> either. However, did you make a telephone call to Doc Tavish ahead
> of time to confirm the date and time?
During my drive to San Antonio, I reported on my location, and
continued to ask Mr. Bradbury for a specific day and time.
>
> >We called Mr. Bradbury from the courthouse, saying that we were
> >there, but he had run away from town. So we stopped for lunch,
> >drove by his house (which is only a few blocks away from the
> >courthouse), and then left town.
>
> I would have put such a meeting in writing and involved a
> notary public.
That might have been a good idea.
> If Patrick Humphrey, the self-described "Chief Instigator", wanted
> to duke it out with Doc Tavish, doing so on private property with
> legal papers not holding
> each other liable for any sort of damages should have been
> considered. Besides, how do you know Doc Tavish didn't have prior
> plans?
Non one wanted to "duke it out" with anyone. If that were the case,
why would we have visited the County Sheriff's office first?
Patrick Humphrey was there with me because of Mr. Bradbury's
documented history of violence. I did not want to go alone.
>
> >That's all there is to it. Mr. Bradbury spent quite a few months
> >"being nice" to me online, agreeing that he had been set up by the
> >likes of Don Ellis and Pat Blakely, but then suddenly had a change
> >of heart and began attacking me and accusing me of perjury, etc.
> >
> I recall reading posts to that effect.
>
> >All I wanted was to ask him to stop, since asking him in Usenet
> >wasn't working.
> >
> Again, I would have put the details of the meeting on an
> actual piece of paper so as to avoid any confusion. That's just a
> polite suggestion and, if you two are planning on meeting him
> during an MS bicycle run, couldn't you write up just such a
> proposal? I don't sense anything malicious on your part,
> but Mr. Humphrey appears to want to get into some sort of mutual
> combat. I base that opinion on the ferocity of his (always
> off-topic) posts, unless he's
> merely pulling everyone's leg.
I am not planning on meeting him at an MS ride. I offered to meet
him, he ran away. I have no interest in pursuing it further. Patrick
Humphrey and I are not the same person. He has his agenda, (which I
believe is to participate in a fund raiser for MS that happens to go
through Mr. Bradbury's town -- and if I remember correctly, he was
involved in this ride for many years before he ever knew of Mr.
Bradbury), I have mine, which is to live my life free of Mr.
Bradbury's hysterical drivel.
>
> I discovered alt.revisionism after the legal thing with Yale
> Eideken
> (sp?)
> was already over. Why does Patrick Humphrey hate Doc Tavish with
> such intensity? I never read his name in the legal document unless
> I missed it.
>
> >It's reqlly no big deal, except that the DA definitely told us
> >that he had never met Mr. Bradbury, and Mr. Bradbury had never
> >been in to see him, which showed us that Mr. Bradbury has lied
> >many, many times here when he said he was "on a first-name basis"
> >with the DA.
> >
> Does not the possibility exist that the DA told you that for
> reasons
> that
> can easily be speculated on? With my Pro-26 scanner, I was once
> able to pick up two city police officers communicating with each
> other and referring to blacks as "spades" and "coons" and "niggers"
> while crusing the town in their squad cars. If asked, wouldn't the
> DA deny such things happened for reasons that are obvious?
I have no reason to believe that a public official and sworn office
of the Court would lie to me.
Once again, I am not Patrick Humphrey, nor am I privy to his
"agenda."
>
> Also, thanks for the URLs in the "Who Started the Reichstag
> Fire?"
> thread
> as I've been going through my collection of WW II books and reading
> what I can
> on the subject. Now if only I can locate transcripts to the trial
> that followed THAT would be a fascinating read.
>
> Best,
>
> NF
My pleasure.
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQB+pcidySwjCuT94EQLlQgCgmIyQI6Ep5FF5vGDV4/iRTtIQ2BEAnRO8
VeqJ2xTLzfSk1kgwuZmCCpI7
=baoR
Hank Kimball (County Agent)
nationa...@aol.comNoHoaxes (National Front) wrote:
>>We've been by his house, National Runt. He ran away after learning we'd be
>>in town that day.
I was already out of town before you and the two pigs showed up unannounced and
NOT for the purpose stated.
I.E.
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit. I
would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore false
witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the criminal
harassment I have had done to me. I want YOU and Yale to deny causing the
harassment I have been subjected to because of my address being distributed and
the info being used criminally... <END>
I made no mention of you coming nor your blimp wife! The ONLY purpose In stated
for anyone to comewas for Yale to re-file his kook lawsuit alonng with sara as
his key winess. I have no interets in hearing kooks rant at my DA's offoice, nor
the sheriff's office not the police station! I can'[t help it if Patrick and
Sara are so goddmaned stupid they don't perceive the meaning of plain English
suchy as shown above!
BTW Patrick my physical presence was not required at all for that lawsuit to be
re-filed BUT if Perjurer Edeiken and Perjurer Salzman want to attempt it again
in my jusrisdiction then I will show up for the hearing. Why would I want to
miss seeing two liars hauled away to jail for perjury!
They claim I ran away BUT the way I see it Yale ran away when he failed to file
a brief for his appeal and since that time he hasn't made a peep since. This
gives an excellent insight why Yale vbacked down:
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
<START>
September 26, 2001
Yale F. Edeiken
918 N Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104-3759
RE: Yale F. Edeiken, Appellant v. Scott Bradbury et al
1714 EDA 2001
Dear Mr. Edeiken:
This is to advise that the attached Order has been entered in the
above- captioned matters.
A Certified Copy of this Order together with the record will be
sent to the Prothonotary of Lehigh County in due course.
Very truly yours,
(Signed)
David A. Szewczak
Prothonotary
DAS/dag
Attachment
CC: Daylin B. Leach, Esquire
Scott Bradbury
Honorable Edward D. Reibman
The Attachment:
<Start>
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Eastern District Office
Yale F. Edeiken APPELLANT No. 1714 EDA 2001
V.
Scott Bradbury Et Al C.P. Civil Lehigh County
99-C-2786
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2001, the within
appeal is DISMISSED for failure to file a brief."
PER CURIAM
<STOP>
The prudent question to why Yale failed to file his brief is answered in this
archive which shows his motive for legal system abuse and how serious he was NOT
in litigating me!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=sq4v2us0odig5nhq79f6crk7a2e7lsqh1s%404ax.com&rnum=6&filter=0
Subject: Why Yale F. Edeiken LOST His Appeal..
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:30:59 -0600
Message-ID: <sq4v2us0odig5nhq7...@4ax.com>
> But you wrote the following: "he's on record as stating that he'll shoot
>me if I show up on his property." Did you stop at his house or not? Please
>stop contradicting yourself.
>
>>>>75 days, Donnie. Maybe you won't be dragged back to Pine Bluff by then.
>>
>>> Again: if you and Sara Salzman hate Doc Tavish so much, why do you
>>>want to see him? Why do you hate Doc Tavish so much?
>>
>>I don't.
>
> Then why do nearly *all* of your posts contain remarks dripping with hate
>for Doc Tavish? You sure as heck don't like the guy and, if you don't hate him
>as you claim, why not ignore him? How can someone who (as you claim) runs away
>from you *also* intimidate you? That doesn't make any sense.
Brilliant point ol' chap! I wish I would have seen the irony of it first! Iam
going to compose a new sig line based on your keen observation above and the one
you made below!!
>>I'm just one of those people who refuses to be intimidated by a
>>sixth-grade dropout who grew up to be a Nazikook and Jew hater.
>
> See my above comment. You've just invented one I've never heard of: the
>intimidator who runs away from you. You aren't on lithium, are you?
Brilliant!!
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=4n4u10thkq0jntg82...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Patrick L. Humphrey-- A Dangerous Stalker? - How To Identify Stalkers
Info UPDATED LINKS S_0202
Message-ID: <4n4u10thkq0jntg82...@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Feb 2004 03:56:50 GMT
_______________________________________________________________________________
Hank Kimball (County Agent)
Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Lying Fat Slob of Xxxxxxxx
Seeing how people like to post where I live then I will post where
the people live who made such info public in the first place!
Sara Salzman
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
4015 S Killarney Way
Aurora, Colorado 80013
http://kevdb.infospace.com/_1_26U9TCS04PZEGED__home/wp/detail/kevdb?KCFG=us&OTMPL=/wp/results_detail.htm&FF=1&QFM=N&QN=Salzman&QF=&QC=Aurora&QS=co&actnav=org&TQA=4015+S+Killarney+Way&TQC=aurora&TQS=co&QP=&QST=&QHN=&wqp=&QZ=80013&QK=1&QO=us&QD=&DM=751&&QI=0&jnum=1&jindex=0
(Archived locally as: infospace_Ssalzman)>>Public Information<<
I am being harassed by having my confidential information being posted along
with death threats, forged child porn ads being posted which give out my address
etc., having phoney sex offender lists posted which give out my address, having
magazine and catalog subscriptions forged in my identity etc. FOR A FACT it was
Yale F. Edeiken and Yale F. Edeiken alone who subpoenaed my confidential info
from my ISP and made the subpoenaed info public-- now let him receive justice
under the Law of Moses:
Just as has been done to me and is still being done to me and solely because
of Yale F. Edeiken exclusively I will apply the LAW he claims to observe to him:
Leviticus 24:19-20 :: New International Version (NIV)
19 If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him:
20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has injured the
other, so he is to be injured.
Yale F. Edeiken
918 N Bayard St
Allentown PA 18104
Tel 610 435-9820
(Source: Court documents)
If Yale does not like getting back in kind what he has dished out in kind
under the Law of Moses then he should either:
1) Re-file his nut case lawsuit in the proper jurisdiction and get charged with
numerous criminal counts of perjury and legal system abuse
OR
2) Encourage his THUG allies to stop harassing me and invading my privacy!
The choice is his!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-1605042226560001%40ts005d08.den-co.concentric.net&rnum=1
From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: Re: Yale Now Admits To Distributing Subpoenaed Information to a Group
of People... Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <catamont-160...@ts005d08.den-co.concentric.net>
>On Wed, 17 May 2000 03:28:14 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
><iloU4.3589$v%5.26...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
>
>>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>>news:3921f38a....@news.flash.net...
:.
>>> You are forever archived here with your lies about your subpoena issued to
>>> get my unlisted telephone number and unlisted address and your lies about
>>> YOUR mailing list. All admissable in court--- your recent words too!
:.
>> None of which mean what you state they mean. Mailing something to a
>>group of people is NOT"a private mailing list."
:.
>So now I do have you on record admitting to: "Mailing something to a
>group of people..."
>
>Thanks for the final admission asswipe!
>
>The "something" you mailed to a group of people was confidential
>information obtained using a subpoena. What you have confessed to is
>illegal activity!
Wrong again, anti-Lawyer.It's not confidential, it's PUBLIC INFORMATION.
Check. Certified. or Jumpsuit.
The choice is yours.
Sara
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <0i402098uj2simd7h...@4ax.com>,
"Hank Kimball (County Agent)" <hank_k...@GreenAcresRFD12.net>
wrote:
> On 02 Feb 2004 23:40:55 -0600, <szkwu74...@fnord.io.com>
> Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >Lying Fat Slob of Xxxxxxxx
>
> Seeing how people like to post where I live then I will post
> where
> the people live who made such info public in the first place!
Thus spoke Scott Bradbury:
"Personal attack is all your kind has."
Lies and smear is all you have which is a sure sign that YOU are the
one who is
the loser!
- --To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer the
$10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!
- -and-
It is your kind who are the laughoing staocks
"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
"My name is not Bradshit you hooked nosed kike"
"Now go fist yourself hook nose"
"Why don't you ever accept my challenge you dick licker?"
Why won't you accept my challenge you dick nibbler?
Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook
nose
Didn't you mean Her Fatness as in your lard assed wife?
He's not a 'groid- he's a hook nosed kike!
Why don't you accept my challenge you filthy hook nosed kike bastard?
you stupid Jewish bitch!
My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!
For the sake of speculation- say that this piece of hog fat was alive
when the nazis were allegedly making soap and candles from Jews--
what do you think the nazis would get from this sow and her fat
globules?
NOW GO FIOST YOURSELF YOU FILTHY WHORE!
Now go fist yourself or engage in some of that "safe torture" posted
about before you perverted lying filthy whore!
Is your obesity why you have to stoop to fisting yourself because a
normal male can't copulate with you- YOUR FATNESS? BTW you still
haven't told us which body orifice it is that you fist and judging by
the size of your hands you must have one big as*hole and/or pu*sy! Do
you switch fist and do both orifices at the same time? Tell us all
fister!
Now go fist yurself!
Eat shit you dirty kike bastard!
I will call a fat lying bitch like you anything I please anytime I
want!
Now go fist yourself you fat pathetic slob!
You're the one whining Miss Piggy! Now go fist your gaping crack!
Eat shit, choke on it, and die you SoB (Son of Belial)
Care to elaborate you perjurious fat pig slob fister?
BTW I am a male therefore I am not a queen but to a dick lick like
you-
Now go fist yourself you fat slob!
I am not a lard ass you peter eater BUT your wife certainly is!
Looks like you're having a major meltdown you fat pathetic slob!
Heed your own advice you cock succker!
Now go fist yourself you fat evil lying pig.
My name isn't blubberbury you filth!
You don't know what I did you fat disgusting lying piece of pig shit!
Now that I told you filth "what it be" you can waddle off to your
mire Sara and
fist yourself you dirty pig!!
Drop dead you lying kike!
My name is not fatboy you Child of the Devil!
Can't refute what I post so you insult me- how Pharisee like of you!
Been answered numerous times you stupid cock sucker!
My name is not fatboy you krema klinker!
Now go fist yourself you piece of filth!
Now go fist yourself and get Sara "The Fist" salzman to teach you
how!
DROP DEAD YOU DIRTY PIG!!
I don't have to prove anything you dick lick.
REPORT ME YOU FATHER SUCKER!! I ENGAGED IN NO FRUD
NOW DROP DEAD YOU LYING YID!
WHO ARE YOU TO JUDGE ME YOU ANTI-CHRIST?
YOU FILTH HAVE ONLT RECEIVED WHAT YOU HAVE DESERVED THROUGHOUT
HISTORY!! YOU GET NO SYMPATHY FROM ME!!!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQCBOkydySwjCuT94EQKfMQCfRx6P4mUKVYeXPap1iqrOhhL6BWgAnRin
UPANFfV8opZWzYKxsYFmH3gS
=sdWl
Hank Kimball (County Agent)
<catamont-65E34A...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> >> >>directly? He snuck into Xxxxxx a few months ago protecting
I didn't say you could BUT you were Yale's "star witness" you fat slob and what
you call an "invitation" applied only to the lawsuit being re-filed and NOT to
hear some god damned fat stupid pig bitch! You bitch about me posting where you
live hundreds of times BUT they were replies to my address being posted
thousands of times! You didn't tell the DA and others how you had a major part
in distributing my address etc. WHAT A HYPOCRITE YOU ATRE YOU FAT STUPID EVIL
PIG!!
>Oh, and here's three words for you to mull over, Mr. Bradbury:
>Statute of limitations.
You can think that all you want BUT if it is demonstrated I am still being
harassed by Yale's act then the statute of limitations are waved!
Also you claiming "Statute of limitations" is in a sense admission of guilt
because if you and Yale weren't guilty "Statute of limitation" wou;ldn't be on
your minds!
>> The ONLT reason I stated I would meet your evil lying fat ass at my
>> courthouse was for the sole purpose stated above! My physical presence was NOT
>> necessary for the lawsuit to be re-filed.If coward Yale will
>> re-file his perjury here then
>> I will make my presence available at the courthouse for the trial.
>> As for hearing a fat slob bitch, rant and wail about her delusions
>> is not something I
>> care to hear!
>
>Nope. You invited me,
I did NOT invite you! I do not see an invitation extended at all!
>I showed up.
And not for the ONLY purpose your ugly face should have shown up and that was
for Yale re-filing his kook lawsuit and you being part of it!
> My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
> (my jurisdiction).
>>
>> >So we showed up at his county courthouse, and met the local DA and
>> >the local sheriff, and discussed the situation with them.
>>
>> You didn'[t come for the sole purpose I stated you fat pig!
>>
>You're not the boss of me, Mr. Bradbury. I can go anywhere I wish and
>speak with anyone I want for any purpose I want.
What was your purpose? TO COVER YOUR BIG FAT LYING ASS!!
>That's called Democracy.
>> >They were both sympathetic, and the sheriff's department told us
>> >they had "a name for him, but we don't use it in mixed company."
>>
>> That is two falsehoods so far. Not one person said a negative thing
>> about me and you know it!
>
>I know what was said to me, and I have three witnesses to it. You
>have nothing.
You are a known liar and you impugn the professionalism of my local people when
you make such claims.
>> >We called Mr. Bradbury from the courthouse, saying that we were
>> >there, but he had run away from town
>>
>> Another lie! I have stated repeatedly I was already out of town
>> when you and your fellow human debris showed up unannounced.
>
>Prove it, Coward.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=69lvrvkfja0g4nfmqf4uqt332njtdoq1u8%404ax.com&rnum=15
From: Reginald H. C. McTavish <RHCMc...@TAVISH-CENTRAL001.NET>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Sara "The Fist" Salzman's District Attorney's Contact Info aka Re:
What is ONE Thing Ken McVay and Sara "The Fist" Salzman Have in common Among
Others? They Laugh at Scott Bradbury
Reply-To: RHCMc...@TAVISH-CENTRAL001.NET
Message-ID: <69lvrvkfja0g4nfmq...@4ax.com>
References: <9r4qrv4mnqcll9apj...@4ax.com>
<catamont-97055F...@news-60.giganews.com>
<8okrrvsbj9ekqe6uf...@4ax.com>
<catamont-9B9C01...@news-60.giganews.com>
<aspurv4qluq7aetir...@4ax.com>
<catamont-6937AF...@news-60.giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news5.uncensored-news.com
Lines: 316
X-Comment: NOTICE: Uncensored-News.Com does not condone, nor support, spam,
illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Report-Abuse-To: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html#13
X-T.O.S.: http://www.uncensored-news.com/terms.html
Date: 22 Nov 2003 21:37:00 GMT
Organization: Uncensored-News.Com $6.95 Uncensored Newsgroups.
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 08:09:31 -0700,
<catamont-6937AF...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <aspurv4qluq7aetir...@4ax.com>,
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=aspurv4qluq7aetir...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
> Reginald H. C. McTavish <RHCMc...@TAVISH-CENTRAL001.NET> wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.co.arapahoe.co.us/CA/DistrictAttorney.asp
>> James Peters - District Attorney
>> District Attorney's Office
>> Administration II Building
>> 7305 S. Potomac St., Ste. 100
>> Centennial, CO 80112
>> 720- 874-8500
>
>Call me when you get here. I won't be running out of town the way you
>did.
Who said I was going there you stupid pig? BTW I didn't run out of town- I was
out of town already when your fat ass showed up unannounced and you did NOT show
up for the only reason I encouraged you to come in the first place you stupid
pig!
Remember this?
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit...
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
You even offered this proof you fat stupid pig!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=catamont-7E1E84...@news.concentric.net&as_drrb=b&as_mind=22&as_minm=5&as_miny=2003&as_maxd=4&as_maxm=2&as_maxy=2004&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: FatSlobDrools01 and FatSlobDrools02)
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: We Have Met The Enemy...
Date: 27 Jul 2003 22:05:16 GMT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Lines: 106
Message-ID: <catamont-7E1E84...@news.concentric.net>
In article <al07iv0uvnq0jvvds...@4ax.com>,
GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
> >Just thought I'd remind everyone of Mr. Bradbury's lunatic ravings
> >before I left:
> >
> >---BEGIN QUOTE---
> >
> >On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
> >wrote:
> > <catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
> > "Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
> > My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
> > (my jurisdiction).
> >You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit
> >against me with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same
> >perjurious affidavit. I would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my
> >peers why YOU and Yale "bore false witness" against me and why you two
> >are not responsible for all of the criminal harassment I have had done
> >to me. I want YOU and Yale to deny causing the harassment I have been
> >subjected to because of my address being distributed and the info being
> >used criminally.
<<Tavish comment February 4, 2004: This text is self explanatory. It says
nothing about meeting a fat slob lunatic at the DA's office to hear her rant
and rave. It mentions a lawsuit being re-filedand nothing more!!!!!>>
> >I want Yale to state his motive for subpoenaing my
> >medical record and then lying about what it stated. I will show copies
> >to the jury and have Yale explain how he deduced it stated "morbid
> >obesity" and that I weighed well over 300 pounds when there are no
> >height nor weight fields on it and the diagnosis was: "sleep apnea,
> >narcolepsy, vertigo." I want YOU to explain why the telephone number YOU
> >distributed was different than the one the subpoena stated and how YOU
> >knew it seeing how it was unlisted number. I want YOU and Yale to prove
> >what I ever actually did to either of you that I deserve all of the ill
> >treatment I have been subjected to because of legal system abuse. I want
> >YOU and Yale to explain why I am accountable for what a person in
> >another state and another country allegedly did so that I get harassed
> >as a proxy of your vindictiveness. I want YOU to explain why I, nor
> >David Michael, or our attorneys were never served with the complaints
> >against us YET after the lawsuit was dismissed in my favor then the
> >"complaints" were posted and distributed giving out my address and new
> >telephone number. I want YOU to tell a jury of my peers what the purpose
> >was for YOU to do that to me. IF YOU TWO GOD DAMNED VILE EVIL SHITS
> >DON'T RE-FILE THEN LET IT BE KNOWN FOREVER THAT YOU TWO ARE COWARDS
> >AND THAT LAWSUIT HAD NO REAL VALIDITY IN THE FIRST PLACE!! IF YOU DON'T
> >DO ALL OF THIS THEN IT IS YOU AND YALE WHO ARE THE COWARDS!! MAKE YOUR
> >SAME ACCUSATIONS TO MY FACE IN FRONT OF A JURY OF MY PEERS AT MY
> >COURTHOUSE IN MY JURISDICTION!! ARE YOU UP TO IT YOU PERJURIOUS
> >COWARD!?
> >
> >---END QUOTE---
> >
> >Of course, none of this matters, since the Insane Chickenshit left town
> >and wasn't there to face me. Cowards? I think Mr. Bradbury has given us
> >a clear definition of what a coward is.
>
> I told the Assistant DA I would be involved in personal business which I
> had no control over and you had not stated as to what date YOU and Yale would
> want to re-file!
>
YOU said "any date, any time, my courthouse."
We were there. You were out of town.
Case, as they say, CLOSED.
Sara
~~End of GOGLE Archive~~
You proved my point you stupid fat slob!!
>> >So we stopped for lunch, drove by his house
>>
>> To take pictures!
>
>There's no law in the US against taking pictures, Mr. Bradbury.
But what was the motive and what would you do if the same were done to you!?
I remember you going ape about pictures of your residence being made and you
even testified against me to that effect too!
Care to deny this?
[Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A2.01
[Last-Modified: 2001/02/07]
AFFIDAVIT
I, Sara Salzman, being duly sworn, state as follows:
7. That other forms of harassment by the anti-Semitic activists have
included,.. publication of a photograph purported to be Deponent's house;
<END>
You can't have it both ways! Your taking pictures of my residence was ONLY for
sinister motives! care to deny it pig?
>> >(which is only a few blocks away from the courthouse),
>> >and then left town.
>> >
>> >That's all there is to it. Mr. Bradbury spent quite a few months
>> >"being nice" to me online, agreeing that he had been set up by the
>> >likes of Don Ellis and Pat Blakely,
>>
>> Law enforcement cleared them! I have been told anyone with an ISP
>> or has access to USENET at an ISP level can make posts and e-mail appear
>> from anywhere!
>
>They sure can. Like Donnie posted pictures of your house long BEFORE
>I ever went to Texas.
He got those from Patrick.
>Remember his little web site? You figured out
>that you were being played by them,
That was then and this is now. What Don did to me was because he thought I had
stabbed him in the back just as I thought he stabbed me in the back. Nothing
more and nothing less!
>but suddenly decided you weren't,
When the FBI even cleared Ellis that was enough for me!!
>because you can't keep a sane thought in your head.
The point being neither Ellis NOR Patrick knew where I lived until you and Yale
made it known! I STILL HOLD YOU AND YALE RESPONSIBLE YOU FAT PIG!!
>> >but then suddenly had a change of heart and began attacking me
>>
>> Because I found out that you were distributing my address etc,
>> behind my back!
>
>No you didn't. Like YOU just said above, ANYONE WITH AN ISP CAN MAKE
>POSTS AND E-MAIL APPEAR FROM ANYWHERE.
YOU made those posts and YOU submitted documents to Nizkor which did so!
>You bought Donnie's lies because you're a hate-filled lunatic, just like Donnie.
I had FEDS tell me Ellis did not do so and that his identity was stolen and I
had people I consider knowledgeable about ISPs claim an unscrupulous operator
can make USENET posts etc. appear from any ISP he wished. Now who owns more than
one ISP and is known to criminally harass people and lives in Toronto?
>> >and accusing me of perjury, etc.
>>
>> Because you distributed Yale's lawsuit which neither my attorney
>> nor myself ever got to see which gave out my address etc. and which
>> is filled with perjury such as your affidavit against me!
>
>Liar.
You're the liar because YOU were posting it all over the place with my new
unlisted telephone number attached to it as well! I have told you before that I
have it archived and you are bitching because I had canceled twice too because
it gave out my address etc.
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177e kocu8996adgn...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
>> Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder
>> Why!.. V2.0
>> Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
>> Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
You still won't comment on Yale fabricating evidence against me and submitting
it to a civil court! WHY IS THAT???
>> >All I wanted was to ask him to stop, since asking him in Usenet
>> >wasn't working.
>> >
>> >It's reqlly no big deal, except that the DA definitely told us
>> >that he had never met Mr. Bradbury, and Mr. Bradbury had never
>> >been in to see him,
>>
>> TWO lIES!!! I helped him run a sting against a shady car painter,
>
>So he lied when he said he had never met you. You really want to call
>your DA a liar?
I call you a liar and this post proves you are caught in still another lie you
fat stupid pig:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=catamont-F5E81C.10225312082003%40tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net
(Archived locally as: SaraDAlie03 & SaraDAlie04)
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Bradbury = Bald Faced Liar. NO surprise there!!
Date: 12 Aug 2003 16:22:58 GMT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <catamont-F5E81C...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
References: <5724740ca62ea81c...@dizum.com>
<szkisp3...@fnord.io.com> <u4hhjvkf952ekuh5u...@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.177.56.61
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.1 (PPC)
In article <u4hhjvkf952ekuh5u...@4ax.com>,
Sonnyboy Tavish <Sonnybo...@AMERICAN-TAVISH-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
I just received a telephone call from Mr. Bradbury's District Attorney.
He said:
1. Mr. Bradbury's comments about people calling me a lunatic = LIES.
2. Mr. Bradbury's comments about Sheriff's department = LIES.
3. Mr. Bradbury's comments about my son = LIES.
4. Mr. Bradbury's claim that he was in the DA's office recently = LIES.
According to the DA, Mr. Bradbury has not spoken to the DA's office in
3-4 years.
Hmmm... who should we believe? The District Attorney? Or a psychotic
moron?
I'll put my money on the DA.
Sara
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
You stated higher up regarding my DA: "So he lied when he said he had never met
you. You really want to call your DA a liar?" YET you posted (as shown just
above): "According to the DA, Mr. Bradbury has not spoken to the DA's office in
3-4 years." See how you conflict yourself?
You are as pathetic as McVay when he lies about his funding!!
--Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He Denies
Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund?--
NEWER UPDATED VERSION:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=f7murv0qqpmcfa2ldce7epo9gtg5am23rl%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: UPDATED The Nizkor Project Director is Lying About Funds He Has NOT
Reported to CCRA!! SAAF Report for 2002 Is Further Proof! R_1122
Message-ID: <f7murv0qqpmcfa2ld...@4ax.com>
Date: 22 Nov 2003 13:01:32 GMT
AKA "Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He
Denies Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"
COMICAL DENIAL OF DOCUMENTED FACTS:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=nlol001kbp1kh698t...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: Ken McVay's (Director of The Nizkor Project) $50,000+ Tax Evasion
Exposed aka Re: Gosh Darn Uppity Juice!
Message-ID: <nlol001kbp1kh698t...@4ax.com>
Date: 18 Jan 2004 21:17:40 GMT
OLDER ORIGINAL VERSION:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=07qc8vguuom77pvmugliksb3dmdf8pp82r%404ax.com&rnum=6
Subject: Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He
Denies Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund
Message-ID: <07qc8vguuom77pvmu...@4ax.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:22 GMT
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=m1gmivkv3ktp8qlh3j375tfhttrlaolk36%404ax.com&rnum=1
>> Subject: Answering Patrick's Lies and Defamation..
>> Message-ID: <m1gmivkv3ktp8qlh3...@4ax.com>
>> Date: 2 Aug 2003 04:38:42 GMT
>>
>> On 01 Aug 2003 21:44:49 -0500, <szkadas...@fnord.io.com>
>> Patrick L. Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Fortunately for the rest of his county, Bradbury's been enough of
>> >a pest to have more than a few records of him in his county law
>> >enforcement's archives.
>>
>> Care to attempt to substantiate that smear? The only record on me
>> is when I assisted the DA in busting a con-artists who was ripping
>> people off. I was wired for sound and acted like a customer and
>> got the goods on the guy who is no longer around. Other than me
>> providing evidence for the prosecution there is nothing else other
>> than I am being harassed along with numerous call traces made
>> because of death threats.
>
>
>What an amusing fantasy!
No fantasy you fat slob!
>> ~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
>>
>> Notice the date Sara!
>>
>> I also see DA Koehn at the usual haunts etc.
>>
>> You also claimed in other posts the DA laughed about me in his
>> talks with you BUT why would he laugh if he and I never met and why
>> would he denigrate a voter to a pig like you!? See how easy your
>> lies are to expose you fat stupid slob?
>>
>No. You DA had certainly HEARD all about it from his assistant, whom
>you claim you told "everything" to.
>
>See how easy it is to refute your babble?
You haven't refuted me.
>> >which showed us that Mr. Bradbury has lied many, many times
>> >here when he said he was "on a first-name basis" with the DA.
>>
>> I AM!!! In fact the reason why you showed up was because you knew I
>> was consulting with him about perjury and how to have out of state
>> perjurious acts
>> prosecuted!
>
>You have no idea why I showed up, and your lies change nothing.
I am not the one who has been caught in numerous lies!
>> If he never heard of me or knew of me then why did your fat lying
>> ass get in a panic state and make an over 1800 mile round trip to
>> cover that fat lying ass!? See how easy it is to expose your lies and smears!
>> Everyone take note of how honest the holocaust historian is!
>>
>
>So lamy lies in so few lines. No panic state. No 1800 mile round
>trip. As Patrick said, I drove from SAN ANTONIO. That's not an 1800
>mile round trip, Moron.
BUT you had to drive from Aurora FIRST you fat lying stupid slob! San Antonio
was NOT your original point of origin and you know it pig!
>I had quite a few reasons for being in San Antonio, none of which are any of your
>business.
You don't see me asking either do you- you fat pig?
>And as I made my way to San Antonio, I publicly stated where I was, so you would have
>plenty of time to scurry out of town like a frightened hog.
I was gone before you got here you fat pig and before you announced you were
coming to see me. Doesn'[tmatter anyway you fat slob! If I was home I still
wouldn't have gone to the courthouse to hear your squeals. You want an audience
with me then either get Tubby to re-file his lawsuit and you perjure yourself or
you file charges against me and we will see what a just of my peers think.
OTHERWISE I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT SEEING YOUR UGLY FACE AND HEARING YOU
SQUEALS!!
>> >> >>You have how many years to visit Tavish directly and refused
>> >> >>to do so? Five? Six? Considering you live only an hour from
>> >> >>Tavish, you can't use that excuse. The truth is, you are
>> >> >>afraid to face Tavish directly. You have to hide either behind
>> >> >>bicyclist or morbidly obese women.
>> >> >
>> >> >What's keeping him from waddling his fat ass
I don't Waddle but the filthy kike who started the lie about me does!
~~Yale F. Edeiken is the True Fatboy and Fat Freak~~
Subject: My Former Attorney Confirmed Yale F. "Tubby" Edeiken is a Very Obese
Waddler V2.1 Message-ID: <f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com>
Date: 9 Jul 2003 13:58:44 GMT
<<Special Note: It was because of Yale "Tubby" Edeiken that I am continually
insulted with such names as Fatboy, Fat Freak, Blimpie etc. Because he is a
major fat-slob lard ass and because he knew my former attorney gave me the real
goods on what Yale is like as a person- Tubby decided to project his "morbid
obesity" on to me.>>
>> >> >a block to the county park where I'll be in 75 days? Could it be that
>> >> >neither one of you have enough spine to show your faces in
>> >> >public?
>>
>> Two reasons:
>> 1) Why do I want to see a bastard who I despise?
>> 2) Why do I want some nut case to have my picture taken and have it
>> distributed thus making my life even more endangered. You must think I am as
>> stupid as you look Patrick!
>
>Donnie had ALREADY distributed the picture of your house, Bradbury.
I don't think he did so originally! Also I did not mention a picture of my house
being taken you stupid pig! Re-read what I said just up a few lines!
>What a short memory you have!
What lack of reading comprehension you have! I can't picture Don driving all the
way from where he lives to take a picture of my house BUT I can definitely see
Patrick doing it seeing how he was part of taking more pictures when you and him
sleazed into my town.
>> BTW I am not the waddler but your suck buddy Edeikike is!
>>
>> ~~Yale F. Edeiken is the True Fatboy and Fat Freak~~
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=f78ogvk6b7 8m28v347rt2j...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
>> Subject: My Former Attorney Confirmed Yale F. "Tubby" Edeiken is a
>> Very Obese Waddler V2.1 Message-ID:
>> <f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com> Date: 9 Jul 2003
>> 13:58:44 GMT
>> <<Special Note: It was because of Yale "Tubby" Edeiken that I am
>> continually insulted with such names as Fatboy, Fat Freak, Blimpie
>> etc. Because he is a major fat-slob lard ass and because he knew my
>> former attorney gave me the real
>> goods on what Yale is like as a person- Tubby decided to project
>> his "morbid obesity" on to me.>>
>>
>> >> You "answered" his question with a question. Why are you
>> >> being so evasive? If you hate Doc Tavish, to what end do you
>> >> and Sara Salzman want to go by his house?
>> >
>> >I don't want to go by his house.
>>
>> BULLSHIT!! You drove by to stop and take pictures. To take Patrick
>> and his pig home you wouldn't go by my house you would take 36 North and get on
>> I-10 to take Patrick home. IOW you went out of your way to take pictures of what
>> you and Patrick have referred to as my "dump" and "shack."
>
>We recognized it from the PHOTOS DON ELLIS had already posted on a
>web site, LIAR.
You are a liar because Ellis was not the original source of those pictures!
Also you had no real business at all to even go by my residence if you were in
fact just going back to take Patrick home! YOU WENT OUT OF YOUR WAY AND YOU DID
STOP TO TAKE PICTURES!!!!
>> >I drove by it on my way out of town.
My residence is not on the way to go out of town! Patrick stated you went back
by FM 529 and you left from the courthouse. You would have traveled East and
would have gone over the rail-road tracks and FM 529 is just to your right and
where I live is further down! YOU CAN'T BULLSHIT ME YOU LYING PIG!! You went out
of your way to visit as you put it my "shack" and my "dump."
I would really like to see the same done to you- you filthy pig!
BTW as long as you accomplices keep posting where I live then I will keep
posting what I post and I updated the dead link in it too!
>> >Period.
>>
>> BULLSHIT!!
>
>
>Keep dreaming, LIAR.
You have already been proven to be a liar you fat stupid pig and here is another
example of your defamatory lies:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 20:52:07 -0600
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: PING: Patrick Humphrey
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.2 (PPC Mac OS X)
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 19:51:33 -0700
Message-ID: <catamont-2F5954...@news-60.giganews.com>
Lines: 31
X-Trace:
sv3-wyO7FvbSZINtPr141KolYiRV+lzOJczR2mei2bb9pgNFSC7e0XHptrJosKTUGzTeQFnJiA7yvhh9lcQ!ILWFNckE0k7TbbNsPhs+EgtlcDJ27bVvLmSpyeYP+7VX4I7VDPfMY9o/xjELcyBasWkmClQq5sAs!rwQ=
X-Complaints-To: ab...@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Path:
news4.uncensored-news.com!cosmos.uncensored-news.com!traffic.uncensored-news.com!feed.uncensored-news.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed-west.nntpserver.com!hub1.meganetnews.com!nntpserver.com!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed3.easynews.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Xref: news4.uncensored-news.com alt.revisionism:1448490
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hey, Patrick!
I hear the Bellville Police have told Bradbury to "make himself
scarce" during the MS ride.
Is there any truth to the rumor that they're going to escort him out
of town when the MS ride comes through town?
Just curious....
Sara
>> >> >75 days, Donnie. Maybe you won't be dragged back to Pine Bluff
>> >> >by then.
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> > Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com)
>> >> > Houston, Texas
>> >> > www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04
>> >> > Houston Aeros)
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Again: if you and Sara Salzman hate Doc Tavish so much,
>> >> why do you want to see him? Why do you hate Doc Tavish so much?
>> >>
>> >
>> >Don't hate him at all.
Yes you do and the lies and smears you post daily prove so! You're not fooling
anyone!
>>Simply want him to leave me alone, stop harassing me,
>>
>> You're the one who won't leave me alone and won't stop harassing
>> me!
>
>What a brilliant neener, LIAR.
Care to deny this?
From: (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Edeiken v. Bradbury: Affidavit
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A2.01
Last-Modified: 2001/02/07
AFFIDAVIT
I, Sara Salzman, being duly sworn, state as follows:
[...]
15. That Daylin Leach refused to act to halt the campaign of harassment
and stated that if Deponent wished to avoid such harassment, that she
should "stop bothering" Defendant Bradbury...
16. That in response to her complaint and concerns for the safety of
her immediate and extended family, Daylin Leach informed Deponent that she
was a "crackpot"... <END>
>> >and stop posting my address here every time someone
>> >posts the name of his town.
>>
>> Tough stuff pig! Every time one of your accomplices posts where I
>> live then I will retaliate in kind by posting the addresses of the
>> evil shit who denied me my right to privacy in the first place!
>> Perhaps the next time it happens I just may cross post to a national
>> socialist news groups or a skinhead group! Who knows what I may decide.
>> Sooner or later you filth are going to learn you screwed with the wrong person!
>
>
>Thanks for the threat. It all goes into your file.
No threat at all you fat slob-- IT'S A PROMISE!!!!!!
Now go fist yourself you revolting piece of filth- you disgust me.
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=hpa1uv0m63koaqbo4...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She Wrote
The FIST Postings! Date: 17 Dec 2003 19:40:10 GMT
Message-ID: <hpa1uv0m63koaqbo4...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=ige2uvsjk0bfi54at...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She
Wrote The FIST Postings! Date: 18 Dec 2003 06:13:32 GMT
Message-ID: <ige2uvsjk0bfi54at...@4ax.com>
Despite overwhelming evidence Sara "The Fist" will keep repeating
her lies and remain in denial.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
Message-ID: <sschwartz-110...@p14.infinet.com>
Date: 11 Feb 95 13:19:07 GMT
References: <3hf46h$p...@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 19
NNTP-Posting-Host: p14.infinet.com
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
>
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Is Sara "The Whipped" Salzman Still Being Whipped by Her Husband's
Electric Whipping Machine?
Message-ID: <0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Dec 2003 22:00:00 GMT
_______________________________________________________________________________
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <beu2201u72bu17ggd...@4ax.com>,
How would you know? You weren't there.
And I wasn't. I wasn't a witness AT ALL.
> what
> you call an "invitation" applied only to the lawsuit being re-filed
> and NOT to
> hear some god damned fat stupid pig bitch! You bitch about me
> posting where you
> live hundreds of times BUT they were replies to my address being
> posted thousands of times!
NONE OF WHICH WERE POSTED BY ME.
> You didn't tell the DA and others how you had a major
> part
> in distributing my address etc.
1. You have no idea what I told the DA because you ran away.
2. I had nothing to do with it.
> WHAT A HYPOCRITE YOU ATRE YOU FAT STUPID EVIL
> PIG!!
>
Name call is all you have, isn't it?
> >Oh, and here's three words for you to mull over, Mr. Bradbury:
> >Statute of limitations.
>
> You can think that all you want BUT if it is demonstrated I am
> still being harassed by Yale's act then the statute of limitations
> are waved!
>
> Also you claiming "Statute of limitations" is in a sense admission
> of guilt because if you and Yale weren't guilty "Statute of
> limitation" wou;ldn't be on
> your minds!
What complete nonsense! Would you try translating that into English?
[... the rest of Bradbury's hysterical drivel deleted]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQCGm0SdySwjCuT94EQK2wgCg/ySeSB29jcDDBe6fIE6xdlus848An1X3
TL7WAYKalBh5cNsUXJBtthE4
=n/5d
Hank Kimball (County Agent)
<catamont-9E2E21...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> >For the billionth time, how can I re-file something I never filed?
>>
>> I didn't say you could BUT you were Yale's "star witness"
>
>How would you know? You weren't there.
Your perjurious AFFIDAVIT was proof that you bore false witness against me you
evil pig!
>And I wasn't. I wasn't a witness AT ALL.
What was that AFFIDAVIT? Why did Yale refer to you as a witness?
>> what you call an "invitation" applied only to the lawsuit being re-filed
>> and NOT to hear some god damned fat stupid pig bitch! You bitch about me
>> posting where you live hundreds of times BUT they were replies to my address being
>> posted thousands of times!
>
>NONE OF WHICH WERE POSTED BY ME.
A MAJOR LIE!!!! You posted my address and NEW telephone number numerous times
you evil pig PLUS you also in consort with Yale made my previously unknown
address and telephone number public! It was you two and you two only!!!
>> You didn't tell the DA and others how you had a major
>> part in distributing my address etc.
>
>
>1. You have no idea what I told the DA because you ran away.
And as I keep telling you- you fat slob-- I was gone before you showed up
unannounced and NOT for the sole purpose I gave for a reason. Even if I were in
town I would not have come to hear some fat stupid Jew Bitch rant and rave about
getting back in kind what she made possible against me! YOU HAVE NO LEGAL OR
MORAL SUPERIORITY YOU FAT SOW!! When your accomplices post where I live- you
have no grounds to rant and rave when I post where the two shits live who made
my address and telephone number public in the first place!!
>2. I had nothing to do with it.
BULLSHIT!!!! You posted that lawsuit all over the place and it gave out my
address and new telephone number. It now only gives out my town, county, and
state which is still enough to subject me to harassment and I am getting god
damned tired of it you fat evil pig!
>> WHAT A HYPOCRITE YOU ARE YOU FAT STUPID EVIL
>> PIG!!
>>
>
>Name call is all you have, isn't it?
Calling you what you are is not name calling!!
>> >Oh, and here's three words for you to mull over, Mr. Bradbury:
>> >Statute of limitations.
>>
>> You can think that all you want BUT if it is demonstrated I am
>> still being harassed by Yale's act then the statute of limitations
>> are waved!
>>
>> Also you claiming "Statute of limitations" is in a sense admission
>> of guilt because if you and Yale weren't guilty "Statute of
>> limitation" wouldn't be on your minds!
>
>
>What complete nonsense! Would you try translating that into English?
You're the one who brought it up you fat sow and I wrote in plain English but
you are too mentally disturbed to get the point!
>[... the rest of Bradbury's hysterical drivel deleted]
Can't refute it can you pig!?
What Sara doesn't want to deal with-- namely her lies and hypocrisy being
exposed:
>> The ONLT reason I stated I would meet your evil lying fat ass at my
>> courthouse was for the sole purpose stated above! My physical presence
>> was NOT necessary for the lawsuit to be re-filed.If coward Yale will
>> re-file his perjury here then I will make my presence available at
>> the courthouse for the trial. As for hearing a fat slob bitch, rant
>> and wail about her delusions is not something I care to hear!
>
>Nope. You invited me,
I did NOT invite you! I do not see an invitation extended at all!
>I showed up.
And not for the ONLY purpose your ugly face should have shown up and that was
for Yale re-filing his kook lawsuit and you being part of it!
> My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
> (my jurisdiction).
>>
>That's called Democracy.
>In article <aspurv4qluq7aetir...@4ax.com>,
Remember this?
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit...
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
You even offered this proof you fat stupid pig!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=catamont-7E1E84...@news.concentric.net&as_drrb=b&as_mind=22&as_minm=5&as_miny=2003&as_maxd=4&as_maxm=2&as_maxy=2004&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: FatSlobDrools01 and FatSlobDrools02)
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: We Have Met The Enemy...
Date: 27 Jul 2003 22:05:16 GMT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Lines: 106
Message-ID: <catamont-7E1E84...@news.concentric.net>
In article <al07iv0uvnq0jvvds...@4ax.com>,
GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
> >Just thought I'd remind everyone of Mr. Bradbury's lunatic ravings
> >before I left:
> >
> >---BEGIN QUOTE---
> >
> >On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
> >wrote:
> > <catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
> > "Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
> > My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
> > (my jurisdiction).
> >You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit
> >against me with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same
> >perjurious affidavit. I would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my
> >peers why YOU and Yale "bore false witness" against me and why you two
> >are not responsible for all of the criminal harassment I have had done
> >to me. I want YOU and Yale to deny causing the harassment I have been
> >subjected to because of my address being distributed and the info being
> >used criminally.
Sara
~~End of GOGLE Archive~~
Care to deny this?
[Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A2.01
[Last-Modified: 2001/02/07]
AFFIDAVIT
<END>
Sara
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hey, Patrick!
Just curious....
Sara
Care to deny this?
[...]
Tavish
Tavish
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <vsg420971fcki2mdc...@4ax.com>,
"Hank Kimball (County Agent)" <hank_k...@GreenAcresRFD12.net>
wrote:
Mr. Bradbury is in full meltdown.
But he keeps adding to his "lack of personal attacks"
Thus spoke Scott Bradbury:
"Personal attack is all your kind has."
Lies and smear is all you have which is a sure sign that YOU are the
one who is
the loser!
- --To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer the
$10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!
- -and-
Now go fist yourself you revolting piece of filth- you disgust me.
NOW GO FIST YOURSELF YOU FAT SLOB!!!!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQCJXhSdySwjCuT94EQImPgCgjLvT5N9ofAlLd1vnBOcwrm3vuooAoJ3t
51Ybn2OoAdDMqnfvYXdNI9Js
=oIDB
Hank Kimball (County Agent)
<catamont-423EF6...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
Thus spoke Sara "The Fist" Salzman aka Sara Schwartz:
From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: My Master Holds The Ropes Just So (poem)
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 114
Message-ID: <sschwartz-050...@p21.infinet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p21.infinet.com
My Master holds the rope just so.
He knows me. Knows my moods. Knows the fear behind my eyes, both real and
imagined.
Those eyes widen as he gently lays the rope down, as he carefully,
methodically, systematically, lays the toys down on the bed.
Soft moans escape from behind gagged lips. I have been told to watch.
To see each and know that soon each will touch me.
He looks up briefly as he lays each down on the bed. Checking reactions.
Watching.
The short whip. A sigh.
The deerskin. The suede.
The small braided thong, the one that stings. A short moan.
The horsehair that stings but never marks.
The canes. The paddles. A pause.
I wait, knowing.
The small velvet bag that holds clamps. Clamps too severe for my breasts,
yet applied anyway.
A gasp. And then his smile.
He knows me. He knows I will take the pain to please him. He knows the
sacrifice I make to his Gods of Pain. He sees the torment in my eyes. The
desire to please. The love. The fear of the pain.
My Master holds the rope just so.
Through his fingers, around my wrists, making delicate rings softer than
steel. Stronger than steel. One on each wrist, a gentle bracelet that is
soon pulled tight, stretched to the bedposts and wrapped tightly. One on
each ankle. No matter how I tighten my muscles as he wraps the rope, still
it is perfectly tight. The circulation moves.
The ankle does not.
I lie face-up on the bed, my body a perfect X. Face up. Oh, Goddess, he's
going to whip my breasts.
But first, two small wooden clothespins bob before my eyes. I turn my
head, remember I am instructed to watch, turn back. The clothespins bite
the delicate flesh of each nipple. Grasp. Sting. Burn. He waits.
My Master knows me. Knows he can whip me, clothespins and all. Knows the
pain, where it will hurt the most, what I can and cannot take.
He waits.
The burning increases as the pins are removed. Ah, he will not whip me
with clothespins in place. But the moment when I was unsure, when the
blood pounded in my temples and the fear covered me like a shroud, then he
watched my eyes.
The whip falls. Which one is it now? I cannot turn my head to see which he
reaches for. But I know them all. I arch my back, try to stay still.
My Master knows me. Knows I will hold position as long as possible, before
the pain forces me to writhe, to turn, to try in vain to shield my
breasts. Knows the moment when I can no longer stay still. And precisely
then, says gently, "Don't move."
My Master holds the rope just so. Gently tugging at the knots, to release
arms and legs from bondage. Gently unwraps each wrist, each ankle. Rubs
each, and kisses the places where the rope has left its mark. The gag is
removed. I swallow.
"Kneel."
I crouch on the bed, head down, ass up, as he mounts the bed behind me.
His hands caress my ass softly, then spank sharply. Slowly, quickly, his
hand falls upon my ass. I wait for the moment, the pain/pleasure as he
will enter me. But not yet. First a gentle tapping, soft touch, as he
marks the place the cane will fall. I brace myself, plead with myself to
hold position, knowing each stroke brings a fire hotter than any flame.
Five strokes. Six. I have not moved. As the pain from each begins to
subside, a soft, half-sob. "Thank you, Master."
Eight. Nine. My knees give out, and I fall to the bed, sobbing. But
immediately back on my knees again. "Thank you, Master."
Ten. I am aware of nothing, save the pain. And his voice, as I am
commanded to orgasm, not from stimulation, not from his fingers or his
cock, but from pain alone. My body responds without hesitation. My
pleasure is screamed out for his pleasure.
Later, I will feel his cock inside me. I will feel the force as he thrusts
deep into me, bruising the tender flesh with his strength. Later I will
come, and come, and come, but only by his command. Later, we will lie
back, exhausted, as he cradles me in his arms, strokes me gently, whispers
in my ear.
But not yet.
Now he rises from the bed, returns to the toys so carefully laid out before
me.
My Master holds the rope just so.
<END>
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: What is power? (was Re: Power Imbalance v. Power Exchange)
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <sschwartz-050...@p55.infinet.com>
References: <1995Jan27.2...@tantalus.clark.net>
<3gha46$p...@panix3.panix.com> <1995Jan30....@tantalus.clark.net>
<3gj06b$n...@crl9.crl.com> <3gv6bm$4...@crl9.crl.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p55.infinet.com
In article <3gv6bm$4...@crl9.crl.com>, ver...@crl.com (Janet W. Hardy) wrote:
> Quick straw poll here: How many people have ever felt totally,
> completely safe during any S/M scene -- safeword or no, light or heavy,
> D/S or sensation-only?
Verdant:
I hate to muddle the semantics further, but... safe? You mean safe that my
Master won't break my leg or suffocate me to the point of death in a scene?
100%. Period. I know my Master would never cause tha kind of damage.
Safe, as in not getting hurt, or not getting hurt MORE thn I'd LIKE to accept?
Certianly not 100%. Mastercat is always pushing limits, and pushing me to
the edge or slightly farther.
But safe in terms of not getting killed or left in bondage to die alone?
Absolutely 100%. And not only with my own Master, but I feel equally safe
with those other Dom(mes) he has had me play with. Perrrfect
<END>
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Sex slave looking for couple in D.C.
Message-ID: <sschwartz-220...@p00.infinet.com>
References: <3hutf0$k...@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>
<3iajlv$1...@news.cc.geneseo.edu>
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 27
NNTP-Posting-Host: p45.infinet.com
In article <3iajlv$1...@news.cc.geneseo.edu>, (Mindy and Aaron Proietti) wrote:
> Hello Tim. My name is Mindy and I am 23 years old. My husband Aaron and I
> just got married and we are looking for some new excitement in the bedroom. We
> are very interested in your offer, and we would like to get to know you (all of
> you) better. Please write back with a full (and true) description of yourself.
> Hope to hear from you soon. Mindy and Aaron
Mindy:
If you're in Washington, you should join The Power Exchange. It's a local
BBS that's exclusively for SM folks. They're some of the best folks
around. We've met many of the people from the Board personally, and at the
parties they hold. I highly recommend it!
Sara
PS. Sorry to post this publicly. I couldn't respond to you via e-mail from
your address.
--
It never rains under my umbrella
Pete Townshend
~~End~~
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Fist Fucking
Message-ID: <sschwartz-110...@p01.infinet.com>
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 13
NNTP-Posting-Host: p01.infinet.com
By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.
Says so right on the label.
We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.
Your mileage may, of course, vary.
Perrrfect
--
It never rains under my umbrella
~~End~~
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
Message-ID: <sschwartz-110...@p14.infinet.com>
References: <3hf46h$p...@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 19
NNTP-Posting-Host: p14.infinet.com
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com
(L Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
>
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience.
--
It never rains under my umbrella
Pete Townshend
~~End~~
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: GREAT NEWS!!!
Message-ID: <sschwartz-110...@p14.infinet.com>
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 20
NNTP-Posting-Host: p14.infinet.com
For those of you who weren't aware of it, SandMUtopia Guardian was on the
block. It looked like we were going to lose it for good.
However:
The Utopian Network (Adam Selene/Adam's Whips) has purchased it!
We've been talking to Gerry this weekend at Anything for Love here in
Columbus (Gerry = Jillian), and she says they have great plans for it!
It will be a quarterly at first, while they get the "hang" of publishing.
NO fiction, just informational articles, photographs, etc.
Lets cross fingers and wish them good luck!
Perrrfect
--
It never rains under my umbrella
Pete Townshend
~~End~~
From: ssch...@infinet.com (Sara aka Perrrfect)
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: What makes someone li
Organization: Cat's Lair
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <sschwartz-090...@p24.infinet.com>
References: <9748WLTQK...@juris.com> <3hcclp$j...@news.cerf.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p24.infinet.com
In article <3hcclp$j...@news.cerf.net>, eigh...@cyberverse.com (Eightmeg) wrote:
> jmi...@juris.com wrote:
>
>
> : My point about most people being abused was merely a comment....it had
> : no point to make other than to inquire...
>
> My Domina and I have wondered the same thing. My experience is
> that I went to a BBS meeting for a small city and a large portion of the
> people there were, to my dismay, a very unbalanced, retarded looking
> abused lot. I sort of expected the people at an S&M club to be like
> that. But when I went to the S&M club, the people (generally) looked
> normal, bright, intelligent, balanced and attractive!
>
What small city? Those of us who live in small cities and who practise D&M
don't think of ourselves as unbalanced or retarded at all.
I believe a SERIOUS apology is needed here. This is a truly offensive post
to me, at least.
Perrrfect
--
"It never rains under my umbrella."
Pete Townshend
~~End~~
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: BBS situation for comment
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <sschwartz-050...@p21.infinet.com>
References: <3gup6u$7...@sundog.tiac.net> <3h0ra3$5...@tpe.ncm.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p21.infinet.com
In article <3h0ra3$5...@tpe.ncm.com>, gri...@tpe.ncm.com (Bob Grimes) wrote:
>
> The Power Exchange also has a dungeon avialable for members, but
> consenuality is not a problem. A submissive must accept a collar
> <thus consensuality> before the Dom who offered the collar can use
> that command and all other D/s commands.
>
Just to add a brief .02 here, not only is consensuality the basis for the
Dungeon on TPE, but the quality of the members also aids here. Just once,
I was addressed by a new member as "slut." Before I could even TYPE a
response, four other people on the Board had called this person (gently)
to task. I was impressed.
Perrrfect
--
Go ahead, take the moral high ground. All that divine backlighting makes an
excellent target.
~~End~~
From: ssch...@infinet.com (Sara aka Perrrfect)
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: What's in a gag?
Followup-To: alt.sex.bondage
Organization: Cat's Lair
Lines: 16
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <sschwartz-0...@p09.infinet.com>
References: <3gl7t9$6a...@usenetp1.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p09.infinet.com
In article <3gl7t9$6a...@usenetp1.news.prodigy.com>, PEG...@prodigy.com
(Steven Phillips) wrote:
> My wife wants to top her very truculant husband but need help in the
> gagging. Any good sugestions will be used. Our attempts seem to always
> fail.
There are a number of household items that make excellent gags. A small
piece of sponge wrapped in a bandana and then knotted. A "whiffle" golf
ball (practise ball) with a piece of cloth through it. A pair of panties,
or pantyhose.
What specific problems are you encountering?
Perrrfect
--
~~End~~
From: ssch...@infinet.com (Sara aka Perrrfect)
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: YKINOKism revisited (was: Bigotry and Hatred. . .)
Followup-To: alt.sex.bondage
Organization: Cat's Lair
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <sschwartz-0...@p17.infinet.com>
References: <233416Z...@anon.penet.fi>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p17.infinet.com
In article <233416Z...@anon.penet.fi>, an12...@anon.penet.fi
(Laurelie) wrote:
> 1. If you can say that the kinks of murder, rape, non-consensual
> abuse are not ok (and there are people with these kinks!), then
> you too, believe that all kinks are not created equal.
>
My only problem with an otherwise excellent, well-written, and beautifully
punctuated post is this. Murder is a KINK? Perhaps I need a definition here
of kink.
Granted, the dictionaries may not be too much help here, but the Webster's
9th defines it (in our context) as "2. a mental or physical peculiarity:
eccentricity, quirk, whim, 3. a clever unusual way of doing something"
I'm just not certain I can view murderers and rapsist as merely people with
different kinks than mine.
Can we get a good definition, Laurelie?
Thanks!
~~End~~
Sara "The Fist" Salzman is really into torture isn't she!?
Tavish
Sara "The Fist" Salzman: Quintessential homeliness in the flesh:
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif <Sitting and authoring S&M<
Everyone just look at the size of those hands and wrist! Sara must be a real
power fister!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif <Standing Medusa look<
Looks like your face has been fisted too many times too!
Has "THE MASTER" given you too many beatings or have you
stayed too long under his electric fan turned whipping machine
too long?
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Is Sara "The Whipped" Salzman Still Being Whipped by Her Husband's
Electric Whipping Machine?
Message-ID: <0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Dec 2003 22:00:00 GMT
Sara Salzman
"Hank Kimball (County Agent)" <hank_k...@GreenAcresRFD12.net>
wrote:
Thus spoke Scott Bradbury:
"Personal attack is all your kind has."
Lies and smear is all you have which is a sure sign that YOU are the one
who is
the loser!
--To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer the
$10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!
-and-
--
Hank Kimball (County Agent)
<catamont-F21437...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <aab520d4e82o9vhqm...@4ax.com>,
> "Hank Kimball (County Agent)" <hank_k...@GreenAcresRFD12.net>
> wrote:
>
> Thus spoke Scott Bradbury:
Yet you are the nut who accused me of being afflicted with Obsessive Compulsive
Disorder! How many more times are you going to post the same one sided and out
of context slurs!?
You truly prove you have mental problems in addition to your personality
disorders because of your S&M Torture lifestyle!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=9ti42055o5h7ktuss5j3rrme1vtqemssgf%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: THUS SPOKE SARA SALZMAN
Message-ID: <9ti42055o5h7ktuss...@4ax.com>
Date: 5 Feb 2004 13:55:58 GMT
User
again.
Get some new material you dolt.
Your pal
On 5 Feb 2004 23:26:15 GMT, "Hank Kimball (County Agent)"
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <v7k520t1l37j7hc21...@4ax.com>,
"Hank Kimball (County Agent)" <hank_k...@GreenAcresRFD12.net>
wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:17:13 -0700,
> <catamont-F21437...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <aab520d4e82o9vhqm...@4ax.com>,
> > "Hank Kimball (County Agent)" <hank_k...@GreenAcresRFD12.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Thus spoke Scott Bradbury:
>
> Yet you are the nut who accused me of being afflicted with
> Obsessive Compulsive
> Disorder! How many more times are you going to post the same one
> sided and out
> of context slurs!?
>
ROFLMAO!!!!! BRADBURY is complaining about people re-posting
things?!?!?!?
Stop posting my address. You've only re-posted it about 500 times.
It's the finest example I've ever seen of Pot. Kettle. Black.
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQCLh5CdySwjCuT94EQK5aQCfX5hqCir20bFm8vESsl1vCzNogw0An1QC
2YePcB+9dbMjLncFdrlABDEW
=Pyqu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Joebruno
>
That doesn't take guts, just a strong stomach.
James Fenimoore
>
Why do people call you _Sara "The Fist" Salzman_?
James Fenimoore
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>In article <v7k520t1l37j7hc21...@4ax.com>,
> "Hank Kimball (County Agent)" <hank_k...@GreenAcresRFD12.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:17:13 -0700,
>> <catamont-F21437...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <aab520d4e82o9vhqm...@4ax.com>,
>> > "Hank Kimball (County Agent)" <hank_k...@GreenAcresRFD12.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Thus spoke Scott Bradbury:
>>
>> Yet you are the nut who accused me of being afflicted with
>> Obsessive Compulsive
>> Disorder! How many more times are you going to post the same one
>> sided and out
>> of context slurs!?
>>
>
>ROFLMAO!!!!! BRADBURY is complaining about people re-posting
>things?!?!?!?
>
>Stop posting my address. You've only re-posted it about 500 times.
>
But didn't he _re-post_ it after your little friends had
posted where he lives? Pot calling kettle black fits you.
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <c0153s$124brt$7...@ID-199628.news.uni-berlin.de>,
fenim...@hotmail.com (James Fenimoore) wrote:
No. Next question.
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQCQaBydySwjCuT94EQJd3wCeKzyGpbkRAcjX3WbDEVsPhYDBNjEAoJ3X
Fxy2MpaeK0K7eCdrtx2wwyzO
=G95j
Steven Mock
news:c014ul$124brt$6...@ID-199628.news.uni-berlin.de:
> In article <catamont-F21437...@news-60.giganews.com>,
> cata...@concentric.net says...
>>
>
> Why do people call you _Sara "The Fist" Salzman_?
Define "people".
Steven Mock