The Protocols of Zion Exposed
Joe Bruno
by J.H. Hunting
(Reprinted from the Vineyard, March, 1978)
This timely article is reprinted to expose the upsurge of anti-Semitism
caused by this infamous forgery.
I have on my desk unsavoury anti-Semitic literature which is currently
being foisted upon the public, and the clergy in particular.
Because this literature expresses such ugly Jew-hate and is so
blatantly
untrue I feel it my duty to unmask the lies set forth.
Included in the literature which is being circulated through the post
is
a broadsheet carrying the following advertisement:
"THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION. Originally translated by Victor
Marsden, great British journalist. Believed by many to be the original
minutes of the Zionist plot for world power."
"THE INTERNATIONAL JEW". Originally published by Henry Ford, Snr.
Reproduced in compact form.
Henry Ford Publicly Retracted His Views.
Regretfully, Mr. Henry Ford Snr. initiated a campaign of Jew-hate in
1920. His Book, "THE INTERNATIONAL JEW" WAS BASED MAINLY ON "THE
PROTOCOLS'. However, what the publishers of this current edition of
'THE
INTERNATIONAL JEW' do not state is that Mr. Ford completely retracted
his views expressed in his book. It is only fair that his retraction be
quoted herewith.
"To my great regret I learn that in the Dearborn Independent and in
reprint pamphlets entitled, 'THE INTERNATIONAL JEW', there have
appeared
articles which induce the Jews to regard me as their enemy, promoting
anti-Semitism.
"As a result of this survey I am deeply mortified that this journal,
which is intended to be constructive and not destructive, has been made
the medium for resurrecting exploded fictions, for giving currency to
the so-called Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion, which have been
demonstrated, as I learn, to be gross forgeries, and for contending
that
the Jews have been engaged in a conspiracy to control the capital and
the industries of the world, besides laying at their door many offences
against decency, public order and good morals...I deem it to be my duty
as an honourable man to make amends for the wrong done to the Jews as
fellow men and brothers, by asking their forgiveness for the harm which
I have unintentionally committed, by retracting, as far as lies within
my power the offensive charges laid at their door by these
publications,
and by giving them the unqualified assurance that henceforth they may
look to me for friendship and good will...
"Had I appreciated even the general nature to say nothing of the
details
of these utterances, I would have forbidden their circulation without a
moment's hesitation...This statement is made on my own initiative and
wholly in the interest of right and justice, and is in accordance with
what I regard as my solemn duty as a man and as a citizen."
What are the Protocols?
As many of our readers may not be familiar with this infamous forgery
the following is a brief summary of its evil ingredients. The
"Protocols" are set forth as the minutes of twenty-four secret sessions
of "the innermost circle of the rulers of Zion". These fictitious
minutes are thus laid down as twenty-four "Protocols" or master plan to
enslave the world by the most dastardly and unscrupulous methods
imaginable. here are a few examples:
"Our right lies in force. The word "right" is an abstract thought and
proved by nothing. The word means no more than: Give me what I want in
order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you." -
Protocol 1. Article 12.
"The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with
strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be
persons trained in the arts of government, and will therefore easily
become pawns in our game in the hands of men of learning and genius who
will be their advisors, specially bred and reared from early childhood
to rule the affairs of the whole world."- Protocol 2. Article 2.
"In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a
state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many
contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to
make the gym (Gentiles) lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to
see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters
political, which is not given to the public to understand, because they
are understood only by him who guides the public. This is the first
secret."- Protocol 5. Article 10.
"The Press, which with a few exceptions that may be disregarded, is
already entirely in our hands."- Protocol 7. Article 5.
How Did the Protocols Originate?
In 1901 a Russian official in the Chancery of the Synod of Moscow named
Serge A. Niles published a strange work entitled, "The Great in the
Little and the AntiChrist as a Proximate Political Possibility". Nilus
expressed the view that only the Holy Russian Empire could save the
world from the rule of Antichrist. The idea behind the book was to
bolster the absolute authority of the Czarist regime. In 1905 a second
edition of the book appeared with one significant addition - the
Protocols! Thus was born one of the most infamous documents ever
published. And only Nilus himself ever claimed to have seen the
original.
The "Protocols" Exposed as an Infamous Forgery
In August 1921 Mr. Phillip Graves, correspondent of the London "Times"
in Constantinople came into the possession of a small book in a
tattered
condition. Such an insignificant incident may well have passed
unnoticed
and been swallowed into oblivion had not Mr. Graves recognized a
sentence as being identical with one of the "Protocols". Yet, THIS BOOK
HAD THE NAME "JOLI" AS THE AUTHOR!
Mr. Graves compared the book written by Monsieur Joli with a copy of
the
"Protocols" and in it he found repeated word for word, paragraph for
paragraph and page for page the text of the earlier book written by
Joli. The only alteration was that instead of the word "Zion" Joli had
written "France", and instead of "We the Jews" the original book had
"The Emperor"!
The book written by Joli was a satire directed against Napoleon III and
was entitled "Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu". IT
HAD NOTHING WHATEVER TO DO WITH THE JEWS!
In three consecutive issues dated 16th, 17th and 18th August, 1921 the
London "Times" printed long extracts from the "Protocols" side by side
with Joli's "Dialogue in Hell". Thus was the infamous forgery exposed
as
ONE OF THE MOST INSOLENT FORGERIES OF ALL TIME.
Count Heinrich Coudenhove-Kalergi in his book "ANTI-SEMITISM THROUGHOUT
THE AGES" (English translation, Hutchinson, 1935) writes: "This
plagiarism is an anti-Semitic forgery from the beginning to the end
without any connection whatever with Jewish personalities, groups,
organizations or conferences. The publication is in no wise, whether
directly or indirectly, a product of the Jewish spirit, or Jewish
tradition, or of Jewish sentiments and opinions.
"In the entire fraud committed against humanity which the "Protocols"
represents, the Jews are merely innocent objects, while the
anti-Semites
were the guilty agents. Thousands of Jews have been massacred,
maltreated, plundered and imprisoned in the Ukraine and in Germany on
account of this forgery. At the same time many millions of non-Jews
have
been deceived by the "Protocols", they have been induced to commit
deeds
and to utter words which they would most deeply regret were the facts
of
the forgery known to them. No book and no event in the history of
modern
anti-Semitism has played such an important part as this plagiarism; it
constitutes the piece de resistance, the choice morsel of after-war
anti-Semitism.
"It is, therefore, they duty of all decent men in the world, be they
non-Jews or Jews, Anti-Semites or Philo-Semites, to work with all their
might and see to it that this shameless lie, forgery and calumny
disappears from the world.
"It ought to be made clear to all those who know the "Protocols" that
the publication is a plagiarism of fatal world importance. The work of
enlightenment is not only a duty to the calumniated Jews, but also to
truth, for it is no exaggeration to say that the so called "Protocols
of
the Elders of Zion" are both one of the most insolent forgeries of all
time and one of the meanest calumnies which has existed in human
history."
Hitler knew only too well how to manipulate the masses with lies of
great magnitude and he exploited the "Protocols" to the fullest extent.
Four years after the publication of the warning contained in Count
Kalergi's book the harvest of hatred against the Jews began in Europe,
and the flames of the holocaust were not extinguished until six million
innocent Jewish victims had perished.
The Law Steps In
Dr. A. Zander, editor of a Swiss Nazi organ, published a series of
articles on the acceptability of the "Protocols". But Swiss law offered
redress and community leaders in that country determined to expose the
fraudulent basis of the iniquitous document before a well-respected
court of justice.
Trial began in Berne on October 29, 1934, the plaintiffs being Dr. J.
Dreyfus-Brodsky, Dr. Marcus Cohen, and Dr. Marcus Ehrenpreis.
On May 19, 1935, the Cantonal Court of Berne, after full investigation
declared the "Protocols" to be forgeries, plagiarisms, and obscene
literature and gave judgment in favour of the Cantonal Bernese Act. The
Nazi, Dr. Zander, was fined.
At Grahamstown, South Africa, in August, 1934, the Court imposed fines
totalling 1.775 ($4,500) on three men for concocting a modern version
of
the "Protocols".
waster
sense of duty to anyone or anything..your bullshit words don't impress
anyone.Go bother some more muslims!
"Joe Bruno" <br...@indystart.com> wrote in message
news:1159796164....@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...