Patrick L Humphrey sexually stalking Scott Bradbury again
Donald Ray
Get this, Humphrey is so much in love with Bradbury that he actually
takes the time to count down the days until he rides through his town.
Humphrey has had several years to show up in Bradbury's face directly,
only to run and coward away each and every time. It even gets Humphrey
sexually excited just to think of Bellville, talking about having a
sexual fetish!
The truth is, the Police Chief long ago told you and Psycho Sara to
stop bothering them as they got real police work to work, they told
you to sue him in civil court. So far, you have chickened out and
refused to do so.
I be willing to bet my money that your fetish with Bradbury is of the
homosexual nature. And that is why you are getting all sexually
excited about peddling through Bellville.
Howard Sprague
dona...@myway.com (Donald Ray) wrote:
>>84 days, Blobbo.
>
>Get this, Humphrey is so much in love with Bradbury that he actually
>takes the time to count down the days until he rides through his town.
>Humphrey has had several years to show up in Bradbury's face directly,
Patjerk knows that I will use force against him such as a nine iron between his
eyes if he shows up on my front porch acting like a kook.
>only to run and coward away each and every time. It even gets Humphrey
>sexually excited just to think of Bellville, talking about having a
>sexual fetish!
Patjerk has most likely peeped through my bathroom window too seeing how he
admits to being a peeping tom!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
(Archived locally as: PatrickThePeeper)
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
>The truth is, the Police Chief long ago told you and Psycho Sara to
>stop bothering them as they got real police work to work, they told
>you to sue him in civil court. So far, you have chickened out and
>refused to do so.
Then District Attorney gave them the brush off as well and he advised me to try
to get Yale "Tubby" Edeiken to sue me in our county and he will prosecute Tubby
for perjury and death threats! The FBI told me to sue Tubby. My local police say
they can't touch Tubby because he is out of their jurisdiction. I have done
everything I can do to get Tubby to come here and try his crap BUT he high
tailed it when I said I wasn't going to fight his appeal and that I was more
than happy for the lawsuit to go back to square one and when Tubby realized I
was serious this is just what Tubby did:
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
<START>
September 26, 2001
Yale F. Edeiken
918 N Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104-3759
RE: Yale F. Edeiken, Appellant v. Scott Bradbury et al
1714 EDA 2001
Dear Mr. Edeiken:
This is to advise that the attached Order has been entered in the
above- captioned matters.
A Certified Copy of this Order together with the record will be
sent to the Prothonotary of Lehigh County in due course.
Very truly yours,
(Signed)
David A. Szewczak
Prothonotary
DAS/dag
Attachment
CC: Daylin B. Leach, Esquire
Scott Bradbury
Honorable Edward D. Reibman
The Attachment:
<Start>
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Eastern District Office
Yale F. Edeiken APPELLANT No. 1714 EDA 2001
V.
Scott Bradbury Et Al C.P. Civil Lehigh County
99-C-2786
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2001, the within
appeal is DISMISSED for failure to file a brief."
PER CURIAM
<STOP>
The prudent question to why Yale failed to file his brief is answered in this
archive which shows his motive for legal system abuse and how serious he was NOT
in litigating me!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=sq4v2us0odig5nhq79f6crk7a2e7lsqh1s%404ax.com&rnum=6&filter=0
Subject: Why Yale F. Edeiken LOST His Appeal..
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:30:59 -0600
Message-ID: <sq4v2us0odig5nhq7...@4ax.com>
Read the above and be amazed- my reply way back then was what sent Tubby
packing!
>I be willing to bet my money that your fetish with Bradbury is of the
>homosexual nature.
It is and now Patjerk is all concerned about my medical condition and is
advertising it at his web site. He's concerned about my penis getting hard and
staying hard for hours at a time.I don't need Viagra and I think Patjerk's mouth
waters thinking about it!
BTW I am refiling all new complaints against Tubby when I get all the paperwork
from Allentown and this time I am very sure he won't have his license much
longer and that the Fat Bastard will finally get disbarred. Tubby already has
three strikes against his fat ass!
--Criminal Yale F. Edeiken's deplorable record:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
The Disciplinary Board was content to give Yale F. Edeiken a "private reprimand"
but he continued to act like the psychotic nut case he is and defied them and
refused to appear at his hearing more than once! He was then "forced" to appear
and the "private reprimand" had escalated to "PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest
court of that bastard's state! Furthermore the Disciplinary Board closed with:
"It is further ORDERED that respondent [Yale F. Edeiken] shall pay costs to the
Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), PaR.D.E." IOW Yale had to pay the
Disciplinary Board to "kick his shyster ass" AFTER the Disciplinary Board of the
Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania had to serve numerous notices upon
him and compel him to attend his disciplinary hearing!! Yale also had to pay for
all costs of the investigation too! It's all detailed in that PDF file!! GO
LOOK!!
BTW Yale F. Edeiken had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and
Yale had received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995! Then the bastard got "PUBLIC
CENSURE" in 1998!!! Looks like Yale F. Edeiken is real shining example of the
legal profession doesn't it? Why that shyster still has his law license is a
mystery to me! His assaulting a Deputy Sheriff should have done him in- in 1990!
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=hpa1uv0m63koaqbo4...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She Wrote
The FIST Postings! Date: 17 Dec 2003 19:40:10 GMT
Message-ID: <hpa1uv0m63koaqbo4...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=ige2uvsjk0bfi54at...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She
Wrote The FIST Postings! Date: 18 Dec 2003 06:13:32 GMT
Message-ID: <ige2uvsjk0bfi54at...@4ax.com>
Despite overwhelming evidence Sara "The Fist" will keep repeating
her lies and remain in denial.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
Message-ID: <sschwartz-110...@p14.infinet.com>
Date: 11 Feb 95 13:19:07 GMT
References: <3hf46h$p...@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 19
NNTP-Posting-Host: p14.infinet.com
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
>
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Is Sara "The Whipped" Salzman Still Being Whipped by Her Husband's
Electric Whipping Machine?
Message-ID: <0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Dec 2003 22:00:00 GMT
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Patrick Humphrey
>>84 days, Blobbo.
>Get this, Humphrey is so much in love with Bradbury that he actually
>takes the time to count down the days until he rides through his town.
>Humphrey has had several years to show up in Bradbury's face directly,
>only to run and coward away each and every time. It even gets Humphrey
>sexually excited just to think of Bellville, talking about having a
>sexual fetish!
What's the matter, Donnie, afraid you're not going to have exclusive access to
the Lard Bucket of Bellville? Keep crowing about what you think you know,
because you and Fatty are two of the least subtle closet queens around. Funny
how when I'm in town, your hero runs away, but then you've never made any
attempt at being credible.
>The truth is, the Police Chief long ago told you and Psycho Sara to
>stop bothering them as they got real police work to work, they told
>you to sue him in civil court. So far, you have chickened out and
>refused to do so.
The truth isn't what you want it to be, Convict Ellis. Sara and I have been
to Bellville. You haven't. We've spoken to the county's district attorney.
You haven't. We've gotten opinions of your hero Fatbury that you'd rather die
than admit were true.
>I be willing to bet my money that your fetish with Bradbury is of the
>homosexual nature. And that is why you are getting all sexually
>excited about peddling through Bellville.
I'm willing to bet *your* life, Donnie. That way, when I win, the world's a
better place, and in the event I lose, the world's still a better place.
(After all, it's not like your life is worth anything.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
Howard Sprague
<pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Lard Bucket
The fatso is your pal Tubby Edeiken!
~~Yale F. Edeiken is the True Fatboy and Fat Freak~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: My Former Attorney Confirmed Yale F. "Tubby" Edeiken is a Very Obese
Waddler V2.1 Message-ID: <f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com>
Date: 9 Jul 2003 13:58:44 GMT
<<Special Note: It was because of Yale "Tubby" Edeiken that I am continually
insulted with such names as Fatboy, Fat Freak, Blimpie etc. Because he is a
major fat-slob lard ass and because he knew my former attorney gave me the real
goods on what Yale is like as a person- Tubby decided to project his "morbid
obesity" on to me.>>
Tavish
Patrick Humphrey
>On 25 Jan 2004 09:33:09 -0800,
><e73f388a.04012...@posting.google.com>
>dona...@myway.com (Donald Ray) wrote:
>>>84 days, Blobbo.
>>Get this, Humphrey is so much in love with Bradbury that he actually
>>takes the time to count down the days until he rides through his town.
>>Humphrey has had several years to show up in Bradbury's face directly,
>Patjerk knows that I will use force against him such as a nine iron between
>his eyes if he shows up on my front porch acting like a kook.
Where did I say I was going to show up on YOUR alleged front porch, Fatbum?
You're going to run away, like the 54-year-old Baby Huey you are, and I'll be
a block away at the county park, talking to your DA -- and nothing you can do
will stop that. Bet your worthless life on it.
>>only to run and coward away each and every time. It even gets Humphrey
>>sexually excited just to think of Bellville, talking about having a
>>sexual fetish!
>Patjerk has most likely peeped through my bathroom window too seeing how he
>admits to being a peeping tom!
Really? If you're so sure, take it to the cops. They need a laugh.
>>The truth is, the Police Chief long ago told you and Psycho Sara to
>>stop bothering them as they got real police work to work, they told
>>you to sue him in civil court. So far, you have chickened out and
>>refused to do so.
>Then District Attorney gave them the brush off as well and he advised me to
>try to get Yale "Tubby" Edeiken to sue me in our county and he will prosecute
>Tubby for perjury and death threats! The FBI told me to sue Tubby. My local
>police say they can't touch Tubby because he is out of their jurisdiction. I
>have done everything I can do to get Tubby to come here and try his crap BUT
>he high tailed it when I said I wasn't going to fight his appeal and that I
>was more than happy for the lawsuit to go back to square one and when Tubby
>realized I was serious this is just what Tubby did:
Thank you for once again confirming that you're not only brain-damaged, but
delusional. You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you ran
like the gutless coward you are.
83 days, Lardass. You're going to run like a rabbit again.
Patrick Humphrey
>On 25 Jan 2004 13:17:54 -0600, <szkr7xn...@fnord.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
><pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>Lard Bucket
>The fatso is your pal Tubby Edeiken!
So, why are you going to re-file a suit you allegedly won, FatSlob? Still
trying to figure a way out of THAT lie?
Sara Salzman
Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
> Howard Sprague <howard_sprague@mayberry01net> writes:
>
> >On 25 Jan 2004 09:33:09 -0800,
> ><e73f388a.04012...@posting.google.com>
> >dona...@myway.com (Donald Ray) wrote:
>
> >>>84 days, Blobbo.
>
> >>Get this, Humphrey is so much in love with Bradbury that he actually
> >>takes the time to count down the days until he rides through his town.
> >>Humphrey has had several years to show up in Bradbury's face directly,
>
> >Patjerk knows that I will use force against him such as a nine iron between
> >his eyes if he shows up on my front porch acting like a kook.
>
> Where did I say I was going to show up on YOUR alleged front porch, Fatbum?
> You're going to run away, like the 54-year-old Baby Huey you are, and I'll be
> a block away at the county park, talking to your DA -- and nothing you can do
> will stop that. Bet your worthless life on it.
He doesn't have a front porch. He can't even afford to pay for the
broken window.
>
> >>only to run and coward away each and every time. It even gets Humphrey
> >>sexually excited just to think of Bellville, talking about having a
> >>sexual fetish!
>
> >Patjerk has most likely peeped through my bathroom window too seeing how he
> >admits to being a peeping tom!
>
> Really? If you're so sure, take it to the cops. They need a laugh.
>
> >>The truth is, the Police Chief long ago told you and Psycho Sara to
> >>stop bothering them as they got real police work to work, they told
> >>you to sue him in civil court. So far, you have chickened out and
> >>refused to do so.
Wow... so many lies in four short lines.
1. Didn't speak to the Police Chief. Spoke to the Sheriff.
2. Police Chief didn't tell me anything of the sort (see above).
3. No one told me to sue you in civil court. The local Sheriff told us
that they have a name for you but "couldn't repeat it in mixed company."
4. The only person who "chickened out" is the one who did NOT show up at
the County courthouse.
>
> >Then District Attorney gave them the brush off as well and he advised me to
> >try to get Yale "Tubby" Edeiken to sue me in our county and he will prosecute
> >Tubby for perjury and death threats! The FBI told me to sue Tubby. My local
> >police say they can't touch Tubby because he is out of their jurisdiction. I
> >have done everything I can do to get Tubby to come here and try his crap BUT
> >he high tailed it when I said I wasn't going to fight his appeal and that I
> >was more than happy for the lawsuit to go back to square one and when Tubby
> >realized I was serious this is just what Tubby did:
>
> Thank you for once again confirming that you're not only brain-damaged, but
> delusional. You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you ran
> like the gutless coward you are.
>
> 83 days, Lardass. You're going to run like a rabbit again.
And I'm sure you and DA Koehn will have quite a laugh about it.
Sara
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
Patrick Keenan
news:r77810pp69belcvq0...@4ax.com...
> On 25 Jan 2004 13:17:54 -0600, <szkr7xn...@fnord.io.com> Patrick
Humphrey
> <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >Lard Bucket
>
> The fatso is your pal Tubby Edeiken!
Say, where's that $10 grand you keep offering? Do you have it, or not?
You still have not said whether or not you do.
-pk
Gord McFee
> Patjerk has most likely peeped through my bathroom window too seeing how he
> admits to being a peeping tom!
Well, he wouldn't have seen you, Scott, since you fled town when he showed
up.
INTRODUCTION
"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of my
posts prove so! You can't discern the difference."
EXAMPLES
"My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong you
dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!"
"You keep calling me "Fatboy" you stupid kike vermin. Why don't you put
your money where your big fat mouth is you Jew scum bastard?"
-- Message-ID: <grreuvc487rg2rg6f...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 22 Dec 2003 22:30:34 GMT
"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
-- Message-ID: <rpul00tk1ajl83bjl...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 18 Jan 2004 21:47:43 GMT
"Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook nose"
-- Message-ID: <02io001hb4aq4v5qv...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 19 Jan 2004 21:11:46 GMT
** All of the above from Scott Bradbury, who never calls people names and
is an expert in irony **
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Gord McFee
>>Lard Bucket
Donald Ray
>
> Thank you for once again confirming that you're not only brain-damaged, but
> delusional. You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you ran
> like the gutless coward you are.
Humpsboy is the true sign of a coward. If you would have told Tavish
the date and time you were showing up in Bellville, I am sure Tavish
would have shown up. But you were too afraid to even tell Tavish the
day you were showing up. You show up without telling Tavish you were
coming on that date, then expect Tavish to read your mind when you
were coming! You are a total chickenshit.
You snuck into town, afraid of Tavish, and got ran out of town. The DA
was polite to you but basically laughed at you clowns. You also needed
to hide behind two fat morbidly obese women. No charges have been
filed against Tavish because as you were told, he committed no crime.
They are still tellig jokes about the retard Ari. They told you to sue
him in civil court. You have no excuses not to except for your
cowardice.
Howard Sprague
dona...@myway.com (Donald Ray) wrote:
>Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkfze3ol...@fnord.io.com>...
>>
>> Thank you for once again confirming that you're not only brain-damaged, but
>> delusional. You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you ran
>> like the gutless coward you are.
>
>Humpsboy is the true sign of a coward. If you would have told Tavish
>the date and time you were showing up in Bellville, I am sure Tavish
>would have shown up. But you were too afraid to even tell Tavish the
>day you were showing up. You show up without telling Tavish you were
>coming on that date, then expect Tavish to read your mind when you
>were coming! You are a total chickenshit.
>
>You snuck into town, afraid of Tavish, and got ran out of town. The DA
>was polite to you but basically laughed at you clowns. You also needed
>to hide behind two fat morbidly obese women.
Some of the people who took note of Patrick's wife said her ass looked like she
had two bowling balls as buttocks and how those big cheeks would work up and
down 180 degrees out of phase when she walked.
http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html
Dale the whale is even bigger now than what she was in that old picture and just
look and the rolls of blubber on those legs!
One person at the courthouse mistook Sara's son for a monkey and said: "Here is
a banana for your monkey" and Sara went ballistic!
>No charges have been filed against Tavish because as you were told, he committed no
>crime.
IOW words they wasted my DA's time as well as the sheriff's time and the police!
They have better things to do than to listen to the rants of kooks!
>They are still tellig jokes about the retard Ari.
One person mistook him for a monkey!
>They told you to sue him in civil court.
And they were going to prosecute their perjury too! I have been advised to save
everything and to document everything and to try to get Tubby Edeiken to refile
his lawsuit in my county! We have a nice jail and YES- I would be allowed to
take pictures of Tubby in his orange jumpsuit and I would post them to the net!
>You have no excuses not to except for your cowardice.
They show up unannounced and because I was already gone they call me a coward!
Yale is the coward and it was he who stopped posting after I told the Fat
Bastard to "Bring it on"that I wasn't going to fight his appeal BUT rather I
wished the lawsuit to go back to square one and be re-tried.
Tavish
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3921e1e6.182032557%40news.newsguy.com&rnum=1
From: doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
Subject: CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <3921e1e6....@news.newsguy.com>
Yale is also a perjurer who also makes criminal death threats using subpoenaed
information:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>
Howard Sprague
Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
> You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you ran
>like the gutless coward you are.
I was already gone before you and the two fat pigs showed up unannounced!
>83 days, Lardass.
I am not a lard ass you peter eater BUT your wife certainly is!
<"Thar she blows-- Moby Chick" http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html>
>You're going to run like a rabbit again.
I don't plan my life around the doings of mentally disturbed people which you
are Patjerk!
>--
> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
Tavish
---Undeniable proof Patrick "Peeping Tom" Humphrey has a mental disorder:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
(Archived locally as: PatrickThePeeper)
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
Here is what some experts say about Patrick's behavior:
http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/db/issues/99/10.28/news.peeping.html
(Archived locally as: PLH_Voyeur)
Voyeurism at root of Peeping Tom incidents
CRIME: Cases uncommon on campus; recent arrest one of seven since 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Linh Tat Daily Bruin Contributor Although everyone has heard the term
"Peeping Tom" before, most people may still be in the dark when it comes to
understanding the nature of this criminal offense. Many people may label a
person who secretly observes another undressing or in the nude as a Peeping Tom,
but they do not always consider that those who repeatedly commit this offense
may suffer from a psychological disorder.... <END>
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0responses/2000-0919.resp.html
(Archived locally as: 2000-0919)
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0responses/2000-0919.resp.pdf
(Archived locally as: 2000-0919.resp.pdf)
...In November 1997, after reviewing police reports that implicated petitioner
as a suspect in a "Peeping Tom" incident that occurred in the vicinity of the
rape, NCIS reopened its investigation. Pet. App. 23a. Thereafter, the NCIS
office in Hawaii asked NCIS Special Agent John McNutt, assigned to the NCIS
office in Memphis, Tennessee, to interrogate petitioner, who was living in
Memphis, and to ask him to provide NCIS with a sample of his blood. Id. at 24a.
After learning that petitioner was receiving medical treatment at the
Veteran's Administration (VA) Hospital in Memphis, McNutt contacted the VA and
was allowed to review petitioner's medical records. Pet. App. 24a. During that
review, McNutt learned that petitioner was being treated for diabetes and a
mental disorder.... <END>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kv3u9v8j5ngjn6fcm1aqqc9fe8etvuaclg%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Patrick L. Humphrey-- A Dangerous Stalker? - How To Identify Stalkers
Info..
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:58:46 -0500
Message-ID: <kv3u9v8j5ngjn6fcm...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ipj8iv08hfma986pntotfots2kjsqe761s%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: All Anyone Needs to Know About Stalker Patrick L. Humphrey..
Message-ID: <ipj8iv08hfma986pn...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=mdlpkvs4hnuftqi5efo33j8brrpd4ub88o%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Did "Methodism" Make Patrick L. Humphrey a Blasphemer of Jesus and a
Hater Pro-Life People?
Message-ID: <mdlpkvs4hnuftqi5e...@4ax.com>
Howard Sprague
<catamont-CC3054...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>He doesn't have a front porch.
>He can't even afford to pay for the broken window.
That window is one window of two which have been broken more than once thanks to
Yale letting everyone know where I live and it has been added to the police
files and another window which was broken was noted by the FBI as well!
It will be fixed soon enough you fat pig bitch!
Thanks for proving how you have stalked me!
Sara "The Fist" Salzman: Quintessential homeliness in the flesh:
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif <Sitting and authoring S&M<
Everyone just look at the size of those hands and wrist! Sara must be a real
power fister!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif <Standing Medusa look<
Looks like your face has been fisted too many times too!
Has "THE MASTER" given you too many beatings or have you
stayed too long under his electric fan turned whipping machine
too long?
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Is Sara "The Whipped" Salzman Still Being Whipped by Her Husband's
Electric Whipping Machine?
Message-ID: <0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Dec 2003 22:00:00 GMT
>Wow... so many lies in four short lines.
>
>1. Didn't speak to the Police Chief.
Didn't say you did you fat lying bitch sow!
> Spoke to the Sheriff.
And you filed no charges and you wasted his time!
>2. Police Chief didn't tell me anything of the sort (see above).
I didn't claim you talked to the Police Chief you fat lying sow!
>3. No one told me to sue you in civil court.
That's what you say!
>The local Sheriff told us that they have a name for you but "couldn't repeat it
>in mixed company."
Another lie told by a fat lying pig who is trying to save face- and what an ugly
face it is! You impugn the professionalism of my Sheriff by claiming he would
defame me to a fat pig who just happens to pop up! I have already shown your
lying boasts to some of the people involved and they have your number pig!
>4. The only person who "chickened out" is the one who did NOT show up at
>the County courthouse.
How's that you fat pig? I was already gone when you showed up unannounced and
for a fact the only reason I ever stated that I wanted to see your fat lying ass
at my courthouse was for (as I have repeated numerous times-- let it sink in
this time you fat whore!):
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit. I
would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore false
witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the criminal
harassment I have had done to me....
<<BTW you stupid fat bitch- I don't have to be present for you vermin to re-file
that lawsuit! Have it re-filed and I will be glad to make an appearence and have
you devils charged for perjurious accusations! Don't think I can? Just have
Tubby re-file pig and see what happens!!!>>
I posted the above as early as July 14, 2003 and have posted the above numerous
times since yet you are still too stupid to get the sense of it!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Tavish+%22You+and+Yale+F.+Edeiken+re-file+the+same+exact+perjurious+lawsuit+against+me%22&num=50&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&scoring=d&as_drrb=b&as_mind=12&as_minm=5&as_miny=2003&as_maxd=14&as_maxm=1&as_maxy=2004&filter=0
Searched Groups for Tavish "You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact
perjurious lawsuit against me" from May 12, 2003 to today. Results 1 - 38 of
38 (Search done January 14, 2004 5:29am CST)
Sample returns:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=fnt3hvs8hiou5ado5890t6880kc18bt3t4%404ax.com&rnum=38&filter=0
Subject: Re: THE COWARD OF DOGPATCH LIES AGAIN
Message-ID: <fnt3hvs8hiou5ado5...@4ax.com>
Date: 14 Jul 2003 00:13:44 GMT
Being the stupid pig Sara is she showed she couldn't understand plain English!
It's all documented and was posted before that fat Jew Bitch Whore decided to
come to my town (July 22, 2003) in a vain attempt to defame me!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=d3d4hv4d8moti9sr51kj38p03tbiu16dv0%404ax.com&rnum=14
Subject: Self Confessed Retard, Sara Salzman, Has Comprehension Problems aka Re:
Dogpatch Denizen's Court Fantasy Deflated
Message-ID: <d3d4hv4d8moti9sr5...@4ax.com>
Date: 14 Jul 2003 04:51:30 GMT
I said nothing about wanting to meet with Stalker Patrick L. Humphrey or his
lard assed wife nor with Sara "The Fist" Salzman at my DA's office nor with the
police nor with the sheriff!!!
If the Jewish vermin want an audience with me then get kike father sucker
Edeiken to re-file his failed lawsuit in my county and see how god damned quick
that kike gets prosecuted for manufacturing evidence by the same DA Sara and
Patrick thinks is their pal!
Tavish
"...I'm a bitch and a filthy slut and a typical Jew mother. Oh, yeah, and a
fatbroad. And dumbtwat... I'm a little fool and a lying bitch and a silly
slut..." <--- Sara "The Fist" Salzman "confirming" what she is.
Archived locally as: SaraLyingBitch and SaraLyingBitch2
Message-ID: <schwartz-ya023180...@news.infinet.com>
--Sara "The Fist" Salzman admitting her S&M Bondage Master is obese?
http://www.fpp.co.uk/ActionReport/AR25/Salzman.html
(Link active January 12, 2004. Archived locally as: ActionReportSalzman)
"DENVER Jewess Sara Salzman was the brain behind plans for the disruption of
Mr Irving's December 22, 2003 visit to the city... Her gang laid plans in
several directions. All failed. One of the earlier, less violent projects
was to infiltrate into the audience her husband, whom she described as a
big -- i.e., obese -- man.."
Is Sara "The Fist" Salzman's husband morbidly obese like Yale F. Edeiken who
has been nicknamed "The Waddler" by many people who are tired of his antics
in Lehigh County?
~~Yale F. Edeiken is the True Fatboy and Fat Freak~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: My Former Attorney Confirmed Yale F. "Tubby" Edeiken is a Very Obese
Waddler V2.1 Message-ID: <f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com>
Date: 9 Jul 2003 13:58:44 GMT
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <893910p4k7g722kau...@4ax.com>,
Howard Sprague <howard_sprague@mayberry01net> wrote:
Thus spoke Scott Bradbury:
"Personal attack is all your kind has."
- -and-
"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
"My name is not Bradshit you hooked nosed kike"
"Now go fist yourself hook nose"
"Why don't you ever accept my challenge you dick licker?"
Why won't you accept my challenge you dick nibbler?
Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook
nose
Didn't you mean Her Fatness as in your lard assed wife?
He's not a 'groid- he's a hook nosed kike!
Why don't you accept my challenge you filthy hook nosed kike bastard?
you stupid Jewish bitch!
My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!
For the sake of speculation- say that this piece of hog fat was alive
when the nazis were allegedly making soap and candles from Jews--
what do you think the nazis would get from this sow and her fat
globules?
NOW GO FIOST YOURSELF YOU FILTHY WHORE!
Now go fist yourself or engage in some of that "safe torture" posted
about before you perverted lying filthy whore!
Is your obesity why you have to stoop to fisting yourself because a
normal male can't copulate with you- YOUR FATNESS? BTW you still
haven't told us which body orifice it is that you fist and judging by
the size of your hands you must have one big as*hole and/or pu*sy! Do
you switch fist and do both orifices at the same time? Tell us all
fister!
Now go fist yurself!
Eat shit you dirty kike bastard!
I will call a fat lying bitch like you anything I please anytime I
want!
Now go fist yourself you fat pathetic slob!
You're the one whining Miss Piggy! Now go fist your gaping crack!
Eat shit, choke on it, and die you SoB (Son of Belial)
Care to elaborate you perjurious fat pig slob fister?
BTW I am a male therefore I am not a queen but to a dick lick like
you-
Now go fist yourself you fat slob!
I am not a lard ass you peter eater BUT your wife certainly is!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQBSgOSdySwjCuT94EQJQ8ACgkkZa8OEnDpKODmaESAduJvvOTXIAoJgP
K79tMKt1ylNBiNTBc0Rs36CM
=6lqn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Joebruno
Patrick Humphrey is not the only one.
Patrick Humphrey
>In article <szkfze3ol...@fnord.io.com>,
> Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>> Howard Sprague <howard_sprague@mayberry01net> writes:
>> >On 25 Jan 2004 09:33:09 -0800,
>> ><e73f388a.04012...@posting.google.com>
>> >dona...@myway.com (Donald Ray) wrote:
>> >>>84 days, Blobbo.
>> >>Get this, Humphrey is so much in love with Bradbury that he actually
>> >>takes the time to count down the days until he rides through his town.
>> >>Humphrey has had several years to show up in Bradbury's face directly,
>> >Patjerk knows that I will use force against him such as a nine iron between
>> >his eyes if he shows up on my front porch acting like a kook.
>> Where did I say I was going to show up on YOUR alleged front porch, Fatbum?
>> You're going to run away, like the 54-year-old Baby Huey you are, and I'll
>> be a block away at the county park, talking to your DA -- and nothing you
>> can do will stop that. Bet your worthless life on it.
>He doesn't have a front porch. He can't even afford to pay for the
>broken window.
You noticed that, too? ;-)
>> >>only to run and coward away each and every time. It even gets Humphrey
>> >>sexually excited just to think of Bellville, talking about having a
>> >>sexual fetish!
>> >Patjerk has most likely peeped through my bathroom window too seeing how he
>> >admits to being a peeping tom!
>> Really? If you're so sure, take it to the cops. They need a laugh.
>> >>The truth is, the Police Chief long ago told you and Psycho Sara to
>> >>stop bothering them as they got real police work to work, they told
>> >>you to sue him in civil court. So far, you have chickened out and
>> >>refused to do so.
>Wow... so many lies in four short lines.
>1. Didn't speak to the Police Chief. Spoke to the Sheriff.
>2. Police Chief didn't tell me anything of the sort (see above).
>3. No one told me to sue you in civil court. The local Sheriff told us
>that they have a name for you but "couldn't repeat it in mixed company."
>4. The only person who "chickened out" is the one who did NOT show up at
>the County courthouse.
Go figure...we were there, he ran away, and he's berating *us* for being
cowards.
>> >Then District Attorney gave them the brush off as well and he advised me
>> >to try to get Yale "Tubby" Edeiken to sue me in our county and he will
>> >prosecute Tubby for perjury and death threats! The FBI told me to sue
>> >Tubby. My local police say they can't touch Tubby because he is out of
>> >their jurisdiction. I have done everything I can do to get Tubby to come
>> >here and try his crap BUT he high tailed it when I said I wasn't going to
>> >fight his appeal and that I was more than happy for the lawsuit to go back
>> >to square one and when Tubby realized I was serious this is just what
>> >Tubby did:
>> Thank you for once again confirming that you're not only brain-damaged, but
>> delusional. You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you
>> ran like the gutless coward you are.
>> 83 days, Lardass. You're going to run like a rabbit again.
>And I'm sure you and DA Koehn will have quite a laugh about it.
I agree completely...in 82 days.
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkfze3ol...@fnord.io.com>...
>> Thank you for once again confirming that you're not only brain-damaged, but
>> delusional. You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you
>> ran like the gutless coward you are.
>Humpsboy is the true sign of a coward. If you would have told Tavish
>the date and time you were showing up in Bellville, I am sure Tavish
>would have shown up. But you were too afraid to even tell Tavish the
>day you were showing up. You show up without telling Tavish you were
>coming on that date, then expect Tavish to read your mind when you
>were coming! You are a total chickenshit.
You REALLY need to lay off the crack pipe, Donnie...too bad Google shows that
I made no secret that I'd be there with Sara, and she made no secret of
announcing she'd be there -- and your little protege ran like the nutless
wonder he is. That's how it went in reality. Remember, we were there. You
weren't.
>You snuck into town, afraid of Tavish, and got ran out of town. The DA
>was polite to you but basically laughed at you clowns. You also needed
>to hide behind two fat morbidly obese women. No charges have been
>filed against Tavish because as you were told, he committed no crime.
>They are still tellig jokes about the retard Ari. They told you to sue
>him in civil court. You have no excuses not to except for your
>cowardice.
You can't even troll decently, Donnie. Sleep off your drunk and try posting
sober for once, okay?
Patrick Humphrey
>On 25 Jan 2004 13:52:26 -0600, <szkfze3ol...@fnord.io.com> Patrick L.
>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>> You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you ran
>>like the gutless coward you are.
>I was already gone before you and the two fat pigs showed up unannounced!
It's just a coincidence you suddenly decided to find somewhere else to hide,
right?
>>83 days, Lardass.
>I am not a lard ass you peter eater BUT your wife certainly is!
No, you're Moby Lard -- and it doesn't matter if, in reality, you're 1.90m
tall and weigh 40 kilos. You're pathologically fat in the head, and you
demonstrate that every time you start pounding the keyboard in rage.
><"Thar she blows-- Moby Chick" http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html>
>>You're going to run like a rabbit again.
>I don't plan my life around the doings of mentally disturbed people which you
>are Patjerk!
82 days, Cowardly Cocksucker. I'm looking forward to my ninth straight
Fatbury-free MS 150 ride, this year.
Barney Fife
<pat...@io.com> wrote:
>dona...@myway.com (Donald Ray) writes:
>
>>Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkfze3ol...@fnord.io.com>...
>
>>> Thank you for once again confirming that you're not only brain-damaged, but
>>> delusional. You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you
>>> ran like the gutless coward you are.
I was gone before you stalkers showed up unannounced and NOT for the one and
only purpose I said for that fat pig to show up and it was (in brief):
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit. I
would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore false
witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the criminal
harassment I have had done to me... <END>
How many more times does the above have to be repeated before it sinks into you
fat head? I did not invite fat pig Sara to my town and to meet her at my DA's
office nor meet with her fat lying ass at the sheriff's office nor meet at the
local police station!! Are you deliberately stupid or are you just born
naturally stupid Patrick?
>>Humpsboy is the true sign of a coward. If you would have told Tavish
>>the date and time you were showing up in Bellville, I am sure Tavish
>>would have shown up. But you were too afraid to even tell Tavish the
>>day you were showing up. You show up without telling Tavish you were
>>coming on that date, then expect Tavish to read your mind when you
>>were coming! You are a total chickenshit.
>
>You REALLY need to lay off the crack pipe, Donnie...too bad Google shows that
>I made no secret that I'd be there with Sara, and she made no secret of
>announcing she'd be there -- and your little protege ran like the nutless
>wonder he is. That's how it went in reality.
I was gone before you stalkers showed up unannounced and NOT for the one and
only purpose I said for that fat pig to show up and it was (in brief):
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit. I
would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore false
witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the criminal
harassment I have had done to me... <END>
How many more times does the above have to be repeated before it sinks into you
fat head? I did not invite fat pig Sara to my town and to meet her at my DA's
office nor meet with her fat lying ass at the sheriff's office nor meet at the
local police station!! Are you deliberately stupid or are you just born
naturally stupid Patrick?
>Remember, we were there. You weren't.
Why did you and your lard assed wife show up Patrick? My "offer" was only for
Yale and Sara to wage Yale's failed lawsuit in my county! It had NOTHING to do
with you and your sow wife!
<"Thar she blows-- Dale the Whale" http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html>
Tavish
>>You snuck into town, afraid of Tavish, and got ran out of town. The DA
>>was polite to you but basically laughed at you clowns. You also needed
>>to hide behind two fat morbidly obese women. No charges have been
>>filed against Tavish because as you were told, he committed no crime.
>>They are still tellig jokes about the retard Ari. They told you to sue
>>him in civil court. You have no excuses not to except for your
>>cowardice.
>
>You can't even troll decently, Donnie. Sleep off your drunk and try posting
>sober for once, okay?
Barney Fife
<pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Howard Sprague <howard_sprague@mayberry01net> writes:
>
>>On 25 Jan 2004 13:52:26 -0600, <szkfze3ol...@fnord.io.com> Patrick L.
>>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
>>> You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you ran
>>>like the gutless coward you are.
>
>>I was already gone before you and the two fat pigs showed up unannounced!
>
>It's just a coincidence you suddenly decided to find somewhere else to hide,
>right?
I was gone before you stalkers showed up unannounced and NOT for the one and
only purpose I said for that fat pig to show up and it was (in brief):
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit. I
would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore false
witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the criminal
harassment I have had done to me... <END>
How many more times does the above have to be repeated before it sinks into you
fat head? I did not invite fat pig Sara to my town and to meet her at my DA's
office nor meet with her fat lying ass at the sheriff's office nor meet at the
local police station!! Are you deliberately stupid or are you just born
naturally stupid Patrick?
>>>83 days, Lardass.
>
>>I am not a lard ass you peter eater BUT your wife certainly is!
>
>No, you're Moby Lard -- and it doesn't matter if, in reality, you're 1.90m
>tall and weigh 40 kilos. You're pathologically fat in the head, and you
>demonstrate that every time you start pounding the keyboard in rage.
>
>><"Thar she blows-- Moby Chick" http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html>
>
>>>You're going to run like a rabbit again.
>
>>I don't plan my life around the doings of mentally disturbed people which you
>>are Patjerk!
>
>82 days, Cowardly Cocksucker. I'm looking forward to my ninth straight
>Fatbury-free MS 150 ride, this year.
Barney Fife
Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> writes:
>
>>In article <szkfze3ol...@fnord.io.com>,
>> Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
>>> Howard Sprague <howard_sprague@mayberry01net> writes:
>
>>> >On 25 Jan 2004 09:33:09 -0800,
>>> ><e73f388a.04012...@posting.google.com>
>>> >dona...@myway.com (Donald Ray) wrote:
>
>>> >>>84 days, Blobbo.
>
>>> >>Get this, Humphrey is so much in love with Bradbury that he actually
>>> >>takes the time to count down the days until he rides through his town.
>>> >>Humphrey has had several years to show up in Bradbury's face directly,
>
>>> >Patjerk knows that I will use force against him such as a nine iron between
>>> >his eyes if he shows up on my front porch acting like a kook.
>
>>> Where did I say I was going to show up on YOUR alleged front porch, Fatbum?
>>> You're going to run away, like the 54-year-old Baby Huey you are, and I'll
>>> be a block away at the county park, talking to your DA -- and nothing you
>>> can do will stop that. Bet your worthless life on it.
>
>>He doesn't have a front porch. He can't even afford to pay for the
>>broken window.
>
>You noticed that, too? ;-)
Thanks for more evidence I am being stalked and it all would not have been the
least bit possible without Yale F.Edeiken!!
You are real good at "visiting" where peope live aren't you stalker boy!?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kv3u9v8j5ngjn6fcm1aqqc9fe8etvuaclg%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Patrick L. Humphrey-- A Dangerous Stalker? - How To Identify Stalkers
Info.. Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:58:46 -0500
Message-ID: <kv3u9v8j5ngjn6fcm...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=2&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
You lie like a rug, "Shawn". Pointing out that Dahlman lives across
town from me -- so what? ...I have NEVER posted the name on his
mailbox (another interesting claim, since you think his mailbox is on
the street, and it isn't -- no one's is, in that area, and in a LOT of
areas all over Houston), and I pointed out the appearance of his yard
*two years ago*, Get back to me when you can write something
original, "Shawn". Meanwhile, go cower under your bed, since I'm only
37 days away from being in the same city as you.
--Patrick L. "just thought I'd say that" Humphrey
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkiv2uvg9v.fsf%40pentagon.io.com
Better run and hide, S. Shawn. I may be in -your- neighborhood.
--PLH, I've got a Bat Attitude.
<<Tavish comment December 23, 2002: Looks like a threat of violence to me!
Notice the mention of a Bat!?>>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szk7meluy9l.fsf%40xanadu.io.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=2&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
It's funny, though, that at one time, Jimbo had FOUR phone lines
listed under his name at one address -- and then, all of a
sudden, he's down to ONE line at a different address that is actually
an apartment complex. Yeah, I know a LOT of people who move an entire
family from a house to a cracker-box apartment...--PLH
Looks like you're the stalker Patrick!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkra8oafah.fsf%40bermuda.io.com
Actually, I live on the other side of the Houston area from Dave...and
the shortest possible pedal between where I live and where he lives
would be something like 40 miles. That's one reason I've done it only
a couple of times. (Yes, Dave, the other times I've been by, I drove. :)
Hey, it's good exercise, and it gives Dave the chance to jerk his knee.
--Patrick L. better hide, 'Shawn' -- less than two months to my visit
to Austin :-) Humphrey
<<Doc Tavish comment: Definitely looks like stalking, intimidation, and
harassment to me!>>
http://www.sccadvasa.org/Stalking.htm
(EXCERPTED)
What is Stalking?
STALKING - pattern of words or conduct that is intended to cause and does cause
the targeted person to fear death, assault, bodily injury, or CSC upon the
person or member of the person's family (reasonable person standard).
HARASSMENT - pattern of intentional substantial and unreason- able intrusion
which causes the targeted person to suffer mental distress (reasonable person
standard). A suspect must be provided notice that contact is unwanted.
PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROFILE OF STALKERS
Simple Obsession Stalkers:
Simple obsession stalkers represent 70 to 80% of all stalking cases.
Characteristics include:
1 personality disorders.
2 emotional immaturity, jealousy and extreme insecurity.
3 inability to succeed in relationships by socially-accepted means.
4 dominating and intimidating victims in order to bolster own self-esteem.
5 biggest fear is losing the victim.
6 believing their lives have no worth without the victim.
7 turning to violence in order to control every aspect of the victim's life
STALKING BEHAVIOR PATTERNS AND CYCLES
1 Attempts at intimidation often begin in the form of an unjustified, jealous
and inappropriate intrusion into the victim's life.
2 Contacts become more numerous and intrusive over time, until such conduct
becomes a persistent pattern of harassment.
[...]
TYPES OF STALKING BEHAVIOR
1 visiting or following the victim
2 harassing telephone calls, which includes obscene calls and hang-ups
3 sending threatening mail, which is a federal felony
4 trespassing
5 vandalism
6 killing or injuring pets
<<Tavish comment: My front windows have been broken out twice (on file with
police) [Vandalism], my VIN number to my vehicle has been posted to the net and
it is only obtainable by reading it off the dash board [Tresspassing], and
Patrick makes many comments about my employment etc which I have not ever made
known over the net [visiting or following the victim]>>
[...]
What is Stalking Behavior?
Stalking has been referred to as a "building block crime" because it usually
starts with small incidents that can get more and more serious. These incidents
can include such behaviors as:
following, watching, spying, and tracking someone
<<Tavish comment: Many people can factually accuse Patrick of the above.>>
Be Alert To Common Traits of Stalkers
Stalkers display an obsessive personality.
They are not just interested in, but totally obsessed with the person they are
pursuing. Their every waking thought centers on the victim, and every plan the
stalker has for the future involves the victim.
>>> >>only to run and coward away each and every time. It even gets Humphrey
>>> >>sexually excited just to think of Bellville, talking about having a
>>> >>sexual fetish!
>
>>> >Patjerk has most likely peeped through my bathroom window too seeing how he
>>> >admits to being a peeping tom!
>
>>> Really? If you're so sure, take it to the cops. They need a laugh.
>
>>> >>The truth is, the Police Chief long ago told you and Psycho Sara to
>>> >>stop bothering them as they got real police work to work, they told
>>> >>you to sue him in civil court. So far, you have chickened out and
>>> >>refused to do so.
>
>>Wow... so many lies in four short lines.
>
>>1. Didn't speak to the Police Chief. Spoke to the Sheriff.
>>2. Police Chief didn't tell me anything of the sort (see above).
>>3. No one told me to sue you in civil court. The local Sheriff told us
>>that they have a name for you but "couldn't repeat it in mixed company."
>>4. The only person who "chickened out" is the one who did NOT show up at
>>the County courthouse.
>
>Go figure...we were there, he ran away, and he's berating *us* for being
>cowards.
I was gone before you stalkers showed up unannounced and NOT for the one and
only purpose I said for that fat pig to show up and it was (in brief):
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit. I
would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore false
witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the criminal
harassment I have had done to me... <END>
How many more times does the above have to be repeated before it sinks into you
fat head? I did not invite fat pig Sara to my town and to meet her at my DA's
office nor meet with her fat lying ass at the sheriff's office nor meet at the
local police station!! Are you deliberately stupid or are you just born
naturally stupid Patrick?
>
>>> >Then District Attorney gave them the brush off as well and he advised me
>>> >to try to get Yale "Tubby" Edeiken to sue me in our county and he will
>>> >prosecute Tubby for perjury and death threats! The FBI told me to sue
>>> >Tubby. My local police say they can't touch Tubby because he is out of
>>> >their jurisdiction. I have done everything I can do to get Tubby to come
>>> >here and try his crap BUT he high tailed it when I said I wasn't going to
>>> >fight his appeal and that I was more than happy for the lawsuit to go back
>>> >to square one and when Tubby realized I was serious this is just what
>>> >Tubby did:
>
>>> Thank you for once again confirming that you're not only brain-damaged, but
>>> delusional. You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you
>>> ran like the gutless coward you are.
>
>>> 83 days, Lardass. You're going to run like a rabbit again.
>
>>And I'm sure you and DA Koehn will have quite a laugh about it.
>
>I agree completely...in 82 days.
>
>--
> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
Tavish
---Undeniable proof Patrick "Peeping Tom" Humphrey has a mental disorder:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
(Archived locally as: PatrickThePeeper)
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
Here is what some experts say about Patrick's behavior:
_______________________________________________________________________________
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <me9a10lc7ilij1gti...@4ax.com>,
Barney Fife <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2004 07:27:35 -0600, <szky8ru...@fnord.io.com>
> Patrick Humphrey
> <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >Howard Sprague <howard_sprague@mayberry01net> writes:
> >
> >>On 25 Jan 2004 13:52:26 -0600, <szkfze3ol...@fnord.io.com>
> >>Patrick L. Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you
> >>> ran
> >>>like the gutless coward you are.
> >
> >>I was already gone before you and the two fat pigs showed up
> >>unannounced!
> >
> >It's just a coincidence you suddenly decided to find somewhere
> >else to hide, right?
>
> I was gone before you stalkers showed up unannounced and NOT for
> the one and only purpose I said for that fat pig to show up and it
> was (in brief):
>
> On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> <catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
> "Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
> My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
> (my jurisdiction).
> How many more times does the above have to be repeated before it
> sinks into you
> fat head? I did not invite fat pig Sara to my town and to meet her
> at my DA's office
You're DA's office is IN THE LOCAL COURTHOUSE, Shit-for-Brains.
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQBVVKSdySwjCuT94EQKK2gCdHsttkmYarbnX27bZfBOkpk2b7YoAnj4u
aKaNlRfr4K2jGN1Iic6hR+Op
=7Ija
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <1a9a10diuk6sba7jc...@4ax.com>,
Barney Fife <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2004 07:23:27 -0600, <szk3ca2...@fnord.io.com>
> Patrick Humphrey
> <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >dona...@myway.com (Donald Ray) writes:
> >
> >>Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
> >>news:<szkfze3ol...@fnord.io.com>...
> >
> >>> Thank you for once again confirming that you're not only
> >>> brain-damaged, but
> >>> delusional. You could have been present when we talked to the
> >>> DA, but you
> >>> ran like the gutless coward you are.
>
> I was gone before you stalkers showed up unannounced and NOT for
> the one and only purpose I said for that fat pig to show up and it
> was (in brief):
>
> On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> <catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
> "Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
> My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
> (my jurisdiction).
> How many more times does the above have to be repeated before it
> sinks into you
> fat head? I did not invite fat pig Sara to my town and to meet her
> at my DA's office
The DA's office is IN THE LOCAL COURTHOUSE.
Nice try, Liar.
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQBVVbydySwjCuT94EQLP/ACdHhPErywGQJQ4sKMC+UOMgJf28voAoIJP
f97s14cS5v8VWhuvTcqkqcFY
=cf6r
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <6h9a10t6rn8pf56ua...@4ax.com>,
Barney Fife <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote:
Driving past your shack is not stalking, Moron. It's called "driving
past your decrepit little shack, laughing, and then going home."
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQBVV1CdySwjCuT94EQJMgACg2TEDbzZbyEvb+plwHr3uDwnwwqwAnjsy
P9zY9zhhr4GBHlDvQWFF6yj5
=VsLm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Robert M.
steve wolk
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-5D583F...@news-60.giganews.com...
When Fatbury wants aid and comfort, he doesn't head for the courthouse. He
waddles on over to the Dairy Queen, where it's dispensed from a machine.
steve wolk
"Howard Sprague" <howard_sprague@mayberry01net> wrote in message
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 13:18:59 -0700,
> <catamont-CC3054...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >He doesn't have a front porch.
> >He can't even afford to pay for the broken window.
>
> That window is one window of two which have been broken more than once
thanks to
> Yale letting everyone know where I live and it has been added to the
police
> files and another window which was broken was noted by the FBI as well!
>
> It will be fixed soon enough you fat pig bitch!
>
> Thanks for proving how you have stalked me!
Hey, Fatbury, can I come to visit you? I'll help you with the window. That
way, it will get fixed BEFORE you vacate the premises.
Patrick Humphrey
>Hang in there Pat. The rest of the world is with you.
I'm not worried...how could I peep in a SECOND-STORY bathroom window?
(Despite Fatbury's delusions, I'm highly unlikely to ever be confused with
Superman.)
Gord McFee
GMT, Barney Fife <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote:
> I was gone
INTRODUCTION
"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of
my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference."
EXAMPLES
"My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name
call is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me
wrong you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!"
"You keep calling me "Fatboy" you stupid kike vermin. Why don't you put
your money where your big fat mouth is you Jew scum bastard?"
-- Message-ID: <grreuvc487rg2rg6f...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 22 Dec 2003 22:30:34 GMT
"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
-- Message-ID: <rpul00tk1ajl83bjl...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 18 Jan 2004 21:47:43 GMT
"Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook
nose"
-- Message-ID: <02io001hb4aq4v5qv...@4ax.com>
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Howard Sprague wrote
in message <r77810pp69belcvq0...@4ax.com>:
>The fatso is your pal Tubby Edeiken!
Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <1a9a10diuk6sba7jc...@4ax.com>:
>>dona...@myway.com (Donald Ray) writes:
>>>Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkfze3ol...@fnord.io.com>...
>>>> Thank you for once again confirming that you're not only brain-damaged, but
>>>> delusional. You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you
>>>> ran like the gutless coward you are.
>I was gone before you stalkers showed up unannounced and NOT for the one and
>only purpose I said for that fat pig to show up and it was (in brief):
Except that it wasn't unannounced...
>On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> <catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
> "Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
> My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
> (my jurisdiction).
>You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
>with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit. I
>would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore false
>witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the criminal
>harassment I have had done to me... <END>
>
>How many more times does the above have to be repeated before it sinks into you
>fat head? I did not invite fat pig Sara to my town and to meet her at my DA's
>office nor meet with her fat lying ass at the sheriff's office nor meet at the
>local police station!! Are you deliberately stupid or are you just born
>naturally stupid Patrick?
Except that the DA's office is *in* the courthouse -- funny that
blubberbury doesn't know this...
Barney Fife
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,houston.general
Subject: Re: Slander of Patrick L Humphrey resumes
It is NOT slander if it is true and it is fully documented too!
References: <e73f388a.04012...@posting.google.com>
<7d18105np6d76bln5...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=7d18105np6d76bln5...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Anyone wanting to see documented proofs which would stand up in a civil court
and to see what I originally posted just click the link above.
On 26 Jan 2004 20:39:38 -0600, <szkisiy...@fnord.io.com> Patrick L.
Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>"Robert M." <rmar...@msn.com> writes:
>
>>Hang in there Pat. The rest of the world is with you.
You certainly are presumptuous when you set yourself up to speak on the behalf
of humanity!
>I'm not worried...how could I peep in a SECOND-STORY bathroom window?
You certainly seem to know a lot about where I live and about my residence and
you know what that is a sign of don't you?
Here is a reminder:
Here YOU and Sara "Stalker" Salzman are documented paying me a "visit" and
taking pictures and don't forget you two even called my residence and left a
message on my answering machine and it is obvious it wasn't cordial!!!
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:19:36 -0600
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Patrick L Humphrey laughing at R. Scott Bradbury again
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
References: <e73f388a.04012...@posting.google.com>
<7d18105np6d76bln5...@4ax.com> <szkfze3ol...@fnord.io.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.2 (PPC Mac OS X)
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 13:18:59 -0700
Message-ID: <catamont-CC3054...@news-60.giganews.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=catamont-CC3054...@news-60.giganews.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: SaraStalks)
In article <szkfze3ol...@fnord.io.com>,
Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
> Howard Sprague <howard_sprague@mayberry01net> writes:
>
> >On 25 Jan 2004 09:33:09 -0800,
> ><e73f388a.04012...@posting.google.com>
> >dona...@myway.com (Donald Ray) wrote:
>
> >>>84 days, Blobbo.
>
> >>Get this, Humphrey is so much in love with Bradbury that he actually
> >>takes the time to count down the days until he rides through his town.
> >>Humphrey has had several years to show up in Bradbury's face directly,
>
> >Patjerk knows that I will use force against him such as a nine iron between
> >his eyes if he shows up on my front porch acting like a kook.
>
> Where did I say I was going to show up on YOUR alleged front porch, Fatbum?
> You're going to run away, like the 54-year-old Baby Huey you are, and I'll be
> a block away at the county park, talking to your DA -- and nothing you can do
> will stop that. Bet your worthless life on it.
He doesn't have a front porch. He can't even afford to pay for the
broken window.
<<Tavish comment: I have had a rash of window breaking since your pal abused the
legal system to subpoena my identity, address, and telephone number from my ISP
and then illegally made it public. Some behavior for an officer of the court to
engage in and for a fact that subpoenaed info wasn't legally registered with the
court either OR else it would appear on the docket printout along with the other
subpoenas! Care to deny it stalker thugs?>>
<END>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:06:58 -0600
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: PsychoSara and Humphrey were so scared of Tavish
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
References: <e73f388a.04012...@posting.google.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.2 (PPC Mac OS X)
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 16:06:20 -0700
Message-ID: <catamont-DAFB8E...@news-60.giganews.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=catamont-DAFB8E...@news-60.giganews.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: SaraStalkingPix1)
In article <e73f388a.04012...@posting.google.com>,
dona...@myway.com (Donald Ray) wrote:
> and...
>
> b) failed to show up at his doorstep.
Lie. In fact, we took pictures of his doorstep..
<<Tavish comment: Thanks for the public admission you drove about 1800 miles
round trip to take pictures of my residence! You would be squealing like a stuck
pig if the same were to be done to you would you not:?>>
<END>
How much of the above two posts fall under these criteria?
TYPES OF STALKING BEHAVIOR
1 visiting or following the victim
2 harassing telephone calls
3 trespassing
4 vandalism
WHAT IS STALKING BEHAVIOR?
Stalking has been referred to as a "building block crime" because it usually
starts with small incidents that can get more and more serious. These incidents
can include such behaviors as:
1) following
2) watching
3) spying
4) tracking someone
Isn't that what Sara Salzman and Patrick L. Humphrey did and Patrick L. Humphrey
has a long record of stalking and visiting people just to harass them!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkoh53wd3n.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: PATRICK HUMPHREY- HOUSTON LIBERTARIAN, PROCHOICE and watching Dave
Dahlman slit his own throat
Date: 1997/10/06
Message-ID: <szkoh53wd...@pentagon.io.com>
--Patrick L. 'a grandfather to be -- and any congratulations from a
sick little asshole named Peter Nyikos will be returned with a grenade
with a pulled pin' Humphrey
<<Tavish comment: Looks like a threat of violence to me!>>
A review of Stalking Behavior:
STALKING - pattern of words or conduct that is intended to cause and does cause
the targeted person to fear death, assault, bodily injury, or CSC upon the
person or member of the person's family (reasonable person standard).
HARASSMENT - pattern of intentional substantial and unreason- able intrusion
which causes the targeted person to suffer mental distress (reasonable person
standard). A suspect must be provided notice that contact is unwanted.
PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROFILE OF STALKERS
Simple Obsession Stalkers:
Simple obsession stalkers represent 70 to 80% of all stalking cases.
Characteristics include:
1 personality disorders.
2 emotional immaturity, jealousy and extreme insecurity.
3 inability to succeed in relationships by socially-accepted means.
4 dominating and intimidating victims in order to bolster own self-esteem.
5 biggest fear is losing the victim.
6 believing their lives have no worth without the victim.
7 turning to violence in order to control every aspect of the victim's life
STALKING BEHAVIOR PATTERNS AND CYCLES
1 Attempts at intimidation often begin in the form of an unjustified, jealous
and inappropriate intrusion into the victim's life.
2 Contacts become more numerous and intrusive over time, until such conduct
becomes a persistent pattern of harassment.
How many other people act like Patrick and now his protege Sara Salzman?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Bobby Coyle, proof that too much exposure to X-rays is harmful
Date: 1997/07/31
Message-ID: <szk4t9beh...@pentagon.io.com>
You need to clean up the toys in your driveway...
--Patrick L. "Dave can't stand that I know where he lives" Humphrey
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>: Thanks to a gutless bastard in the Houston suburbs named David F.
>: Dahlman, you mean. And I never claimed there was a tire swing in your
>: front yard, liar. Your _neighbor's_ yard, yes -- and that was
>: something like three years ago, too. Are you going to state that your
>: yard is in the same state of being cluttered now as it was three years
>: ago?
>: --Patrick L. "14 days, tick tick tick, heh heh" Humphrey
:
>Tick tick tick? As in a Houston version of the Unibomber?
~~End of Cited Text~~
Regarding your taunt: "--Patrick L. "Dave can't stand that I know where he
lives" Humphrey"- no one likes for a kook like you to know where the live
Patrick because you are a nutcase on the edge or to quote you: "a grenade
with a pulled pin' Humphrey"
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=2&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
Re: Bobby Coyle, proof that too much exposure to X-rays is ...
home page just happen to bear an uncanny resemblance to the fellow out in front
of your listed address when I came down the street one afternoon three weeks ago
talk.politics.misc - 31 Jul 1997 by Patrick L. Humphrey
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkzpqqqhnl.fsf%40pentagon.io.com
Re: PATRICK HUMPHREY THE LIBERTARIAN STALKER
home page just happen to bear an uncanny resemblance to the fellow out in front
of your listed address when I came down the street one afternoon three weeks ago
houston.general - 10 Aug 1997 by Patrick L. Humphrey
I guess it's just an amazing coincidence, then, that the pictures on
your home page just happen to bear an uncanny resemblance to the
fellow out in front of your listed address when I came down the street
one afternoon three weeks ago...
--Patrick L. 'coming by again in two weeks' Humphrey
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<<Tavish comment: Does not the above prove that Patrick is a stalker and
that he tries to intimidate people? He likes identifying people, fomenting hate
towards them and then letting people know in general how to find said person!>>
Notice how Patrick likes to "visit" people and then remark about in public
forum? Care to deny that is a sign Patrick has a major "personality disorder"?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=3&ic=1&selm=4i41r5%24obv%40pentagon.io.com
Re: @ Stalking Pat: Evidence don't you, "Shawn"? I've pedaled by his house three
or four times, and one time, just by dumb luck, he and his family happened to be
outside. It's fun to mention that later and watch him foam at the mouth, if you
ask me. talk.politics.misc - 12 Mar 1996 by Patrick L. Humphrey
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkendqxr88.fsf%40xanadu.io.com
--PLH, I'll deal with Shawn on the 30th, heh heh heh
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkiv2uvg9v.fsf%40pentagon.io.com
Better run and hide, S. Shawn. I may be in -your- neighborhood.
--PLH, I've got a Bat Attitude.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Looks like a subtle threat of violence to me though Patrick now claims he wasn't
threatening the person BUT the point is- he intended as a threat and he knew the
recipient would take it as a threat!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szk7meluy9l.fsf%40xanadu.io.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=2&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
It's funny, though, that at one time, Jimbo had FOUR phone lines
listed under his name at one address -- and then, all of a
sudden, he's down to ONE line at a different address that is actually
an apartment complex. Yeah, I know a LOT of people who move an entire
family from a house to a cracker-box apartment...--PLH
Traits of Stalkers reviewed again:
WHAT IS STALKING?
STALKING - pattern of words or conduct that is intended to cause and does cause
the targeted person to fear death, assault, bodily injury, or CSC upon the
person or member of the person's family (reasonable person standard).
HARASSMENT - pattern of intentional substantial and unreason- able intrusion
which causes the targeted person to suffer mental distress (reasonable person
standard). A suspect must be provided notice that contact is unwanted.
PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROFILE OF STALKERS
Simple Obsession Stalkers:
Simple obsession stalkers represent 70 to 80% of all stalking cases.
Characteristics include:
1 personality disorders.
2 emotional immaturity, jealousy and extreme insecurity.
3 inability to succeed in relationships by socially-accepted means.
4 dominating and intimidating victims in order to bolster own self-esteem.
5 biggest fear is losing the victim.
6 believing their lives have no worth without the victim.
7 turning to violence in order to control every aspect of the victim's life
STALKING BEHAVIOR PATTERNS AND CYCLES
1 Attempts at intimidation often begin in the form of an unjustified, jealous
and inappropriate intrusion into the victim's life.
2 Contacts become more numerous and intrusive over time, until such conduct
becomes a persistent pattern of harassment.
TYPES OF STALKING BEHAVIOR
1 visiting or following the victim
WHAT IS STALKING BEHAVIOR?
Stalking has been referred to as a "building block crime" because it usually
starts with small incidents that can get more and more serious. These incidents
can include such behaviors as:
1) following
2) watching
3) spying
4) tracking someone
More:
Be Alert To Common Traits of Stalkers
Stalkers display an obsessive personality.
Along with obsessive thinking, they also display other psychological or
personality problems and disorders. They may suffer from erotomania, paranoia,
schizophrenia, and delusional thinking. According to Professor R. Meloy, "these
stalkers have rigid personalities and maladaptive styles. These disorders in
themselves are very stable and not treatable."..
They will go to great lengths to obtain information about their
victims.. even to travel thousands of miles (Which is what Stalker Sara Salzman
did to me!).. They display other sociopathic thinking in that they cannot learn
from experience, and they don't believe society's rules apply to them. Most
stalkers don't think they're really threatening, intimidating, or even stalking
someone else... Stalkers many times have a mean streak and will become violent
when frustrated. How violent? Often deadly... The above traits remind us that
much of stalking involves harassment and annoyance, but never forget that
stalkers can also be extraordinarily dangerous... <END>
Your pal as well as Stalker Salzman's pal- Patrick L. Humphrey has confessed to
being a Voyeur of a "Peeping Tom" and here he is in his own words and what
experts have stated regarding people like Patrick L. Humphrey:
>--
> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
You are a nut Patrick!
Tavish
Sara "The Fist" Salzman Elaborates on Safe Torture
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: What is power? (was Re: Power Imbalance v. Power Exchange)
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 1995 18:00:29 -0500
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <sschwartz-050...@p55.infinet.com>
References: <1995Jan27.2...@tantalus.clark.net>
<3gha46$p...@panix3.panix.com> <1995Jan30....@tantalus.clark.net>
<3gj06b$n...@crl9.crl.com> <3gv6bm$4...@crl9.crl.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p55.infinet.com
In article <3gv6bm$4...@crl9.crl.com>, ver...@crl.com (Janet W. Hardy) wrote:
> Quick straw poll here: How many people have ever felt totally,
> completely safe during any S/M scene -- safeword or no, light or heavy,
> D/S or sensation-only?
Verdant:
I hate to muddle the semantics further, but... safe? You mean safe that my
Master won't break my leg or suffocate me to the point of death in a scene?
100%. Period. I know my Master would never cause tha kind of damage.
Safe, as in not getting hurt, or not getting hurt MORE thn I'd LIKE to accept?
Certianly not 100%. Mastercat is always pushing limits, and pushing me to
the edge or slightly farther.
But safe in terms of not getting killed or left in bondage to die alone?
Absolutely 100%. And not only with my own Master, but I feel equally safe
with those other Dom(mes) he has had me play with. Perrrfect <END>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
Barney Fife
<e5de94c0e7acb434...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@ . > wrote:
>Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
DO IT!!!
~~Yale F. Edeiken is the True Fatboy and Fat Freak~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: My Former Attorney Confirmed Yale F. "Tubby" Edeiken is a Very Obese
Waddler V2.1 Message-ID: <f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com>
Date: 9 Jul 2003 13:58:44 GMT
<<Special Note: It was because of Yale "Tubby" Edeiken that I am continually
insulted with such names as Fatboy, Fat Freak, Blimpie etc. Because he is a
major fat-slob lard ass and because he knew my former attorney gave me the real
goods on what Yale is like as a person- Tubby decided to project his "morbid
obesity" on to me.>>
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <h1sc10dp2brs6gt9e...@4ax.com>,
Barney Fife <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:17:17 GMT,
> <e5de94c0e7acb434...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@
> . > wrote:
>
> >Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
>
> DO IT!!!
>
As soon as you produce proof that you have the cash.
Of course, since you never fixed the broken window you claim happen
TWO YEARS ago, I sincerely doubt you have it.
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQBaFWSdySwjCuT94EQJAoACg1wumpvt40TLZFJ+6/lDtMOlxGVEAn28z
aFAHtWS4aFl7TeELJo+GzslN
=RAzO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>From: "Robert M." <rmar...@msn.com>
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,houston.general
>Subject: Re: Slander of Patrick L Humphrey resumes
>It is NOT slander if it is true and it is fully documented too!
...which means, it's slander. (I seriously doubt YOU have proof of anything
but your own mental illness, Snotty.)
>On 26 Jan 2004 20:39:38 -0600, <szkisiy...@fnord.io.com> Patrick L.
>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>"Robert M." <rmar...@msn.com> writes:
>>>Hang in there Pat. The rest of the world is with you.
>You certainly are presumptuous when you set yourself up to speak on the behalf
>of humanity!
You have a problem with him expressing his opinion? That's no surprise.
>>I'm not worried...how could I peep in a SECOND-STORY bathroom window?
>You certainly seem to know a lot about where I live and about my residence and
>you know what that is a sign of don't you?
Having been by it once, is it my fault I noticed such details?
>Here is a reminder:
>Here YOU and Sara "Stalker" Salzman are documented paying me a "visit" and
>taking pictures and don't forget you two even called my residence and left a
>message on my answering machine and it is obvious it wasn't cordial!!!
I'm sure everything that's happened there in the six months since has been our
fault, too. (So, you got one call...I got one from you when you were begging
for help because your lover Ellis was tormenting you, remember? It was nice
of you to not be able to figure out CLID, so your call confirmed the accuracy
of the phone number that had been posted by others. You might want to note
that of the people you've been at war with, who's NEVER posted your address or
home phone? I'm one of that group.)
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:17:17 GMT,
><e5de94c0e7acb434...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@ . > wrote:
>>Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
>DO IT!!!
Put up proof that you have the $10,000, putz.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>>Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
>DO IT!!!
As soon as you post proof that you have escrowed the money so I know
you aren't going to welsh.
Have you not been paying attention?
Barney Fife
Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>I'm sure everything that's happened there in the six months since has been our
>fault, too. (So, you got one call...I got one from you when you were begging
>for help because your lover Ellis was tormenting you, remember?
The FBI proved to me it was NOT Don Ellis doing the harassment. Other people I
know have also claimed identity theft and causing quarrels or divisions is
Jewish. Seeing how I have seen other evidence that your vermin have access at an
ISP level I imagine anything could be possible! Your pal Laurence B. Shiff
owns/manages numerous ISPs and servers. I would imagine it would be quite easy
for him to do such- seeing how he stepped up to the plate after Yale let him
know where I lived!
Tavish
--Criminal Yale F. Edeiken's deplorable record:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
The Disciplinary Board was content to give Yale F. Edeiken a "private reprimand"
but he continued to act like the psychotic nut case he is and defied them and
refused to appear at his hearing more than once! He was then "forced" to appear
and the "private reprimand" had escalated to "PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest
court of that bastard's state! Furthermore the Disciplinary Board closed with:
"It is further ORDERED that respondent [Yale F. Edeiken] shall pay costs to the
Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), PaR.D.E." IOW Yale had to pay the
Disciplinary Board to "kick his shyster ass" AFTER the Disciplinary Board of the
Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania had to serve numerous notices upon
him and compel him to attend his disciplinary hearing!! Yale also had to pay for
all costs of the investigation too! It's all detailed in that PDF file!! GO
LOOK!!
BTW Yale F. Edeiken had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and
Yale had received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995! Then the bastard got "PUBLIC
CENSURE" in 1998!!! Looks like Yale F. Edeiken is real shining example of the
legal profession doesn't it? Why that shyster still has his law license is a
mystery to me! His assaulting a Deputy Sheriff should have done him in- in 1990!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3921e1e6.182032557%40news.newsguy.com&rnum=1
From: doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
Subject: CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <3921e1e6....@news.newsguy.com>
Yale is also a perjurer who also makes criminal death threats using subpoenaed
information:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>
Barney Fife
>So, you got one call...I got one from you when you were begging
>for help because your lover Ellis was tormenting you, remember..
BTW I forgot to respond to the above:
My call was friendly and was as you said whereas the call you and fat pig made
was not meant to be friendly! Care to deny it?
I need to get around to transferring that call and making it into a WAV file so
everyone can hear you and the fat pig acting like kooks!
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=5rhktv483m9oofgqt8goir93o4pm08ht49%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: 3 Major Jewish Organizations Engage in Holocaust Denial...
Message-ID: <5rhktv483m9oofgqt...@4ax.com>
Date: 12 Dec 2003 22:57:48 GMT
If Jews are allowed to call a historic event a "Holocaust" based on Jews being
tortured, imprisoned, and executed by Nazis then why can't Christians claim
Jews had "Holocausts" against non-Jews/Christians seeing how the 1st Century
Pharisees and the 20th Century Jewish led Bolshevists tortured, imprisoned, and
executed Christians/non-Jews. Jews also deny these other "Holocausts" so going
by their standards they are "Holocaust Deniers" and should be prosecuted for
Holocaust Denial"and "Minimalizing the Holocaust[s])" as well!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=1i7810p7itigphaaq...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Post-Soviet Religion (What Communists did to Christians) V2.0a S_0125
Message-ID: <1i7810p7itigphaaq...@4ax.com>
Date: 25 Jan 2004 19:53:30 GMT
Allan Matthews
<roger@ . > says...
> As soon as you post proof that you have escrowed the money so I know
> you aren't going to welsh.
Your ethnic slur is noted. This Welshman is not amused.
allan
--
allan_matthews[at]bigfoot[dot]com
=========================================
"I am a 'Nazi'"
- "Sieg Heil" Scottie Bradbury
=========================================
http://www.allan.matthews.name
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <3i5d10p7bg5m29tti...@4ax.com>,
Barney Fife <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote:
> On 27 Jan 2004 10:11:31 -0600, <szkhdyh...@fnord.io.com>
> Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >So, you got one call...I got one from you when you were begging
> >for help because your lover Ellis was tormenting you, remember..
>
> BTW I forgot to respond to the above:
>
> My call was friendly and was as you said whereas the call you and
> fat pig made
> was not meant to be friendly! Care to deny it?
Yes. I deny it.
Next?
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQBaY9SdySwjCuT94EQJl6wCfWS42SQdKXCjydbn0UKfBa29rEXkAoMvq
Q39021o64lRLjVtqAXUTp4Zr
=icnF
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <u65d10ldf3ptoaolq...@4ax.com>,
Barney Fife <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote:
> On 27 Jan 2004 10:11:31 -0600, <szkhdyh...@fnord.io.com>
> Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >I'm sure everything that's happened there in the six months since
> >has been our
> >fault, too. (So, you got one call...I got one from you when you
> >were begging
> >for help because your lover Ellis was tormenting you, remember?
>
> The FBI proved to me it was NOT Don Ellis doing the harassment.
Really? And who did you speak to at the FBI, Liar?
And HOW did they prove it to you, Liar?
You called Patrick. You called ME. You make a wav file and I will,
too.
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQBaZSydySwjCuT94EQLgyQCg7ie/9xNDFDWjL0eb7EnF+SMXTZEAn2eJ
dTXdQT9/t2t+u0vUN5GEDVpd
=uO3n
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>On 27 Jan 2004 10:11:31 -0600, <szkhdyh...@fnord.io.com> Patrick Lee
>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
>>I'm sure everything that's happened there in the six months since has been our
>>fault, too. (So, you got one call...I got one from you when you were begging
>>for help because your lover Ellis was tormenting you, remember?
>The FBI proved to me it was NOT Don Ellis doing the harassment. Other people
>I know have also claimed identity theft and causing quarrels or divisions is
>Jewish. Seeing how I have seen other evidence that your vermin have access at
>an ISP level I imagine anything could be possible! Your pal Laurence B. Shiff
>owns/manages numerous ISPs and servers. I would imagine it would be quite
>easy for him to do such- seeing how he stepped up to the plate after Yale let
>him know where I lived!
>
> Tavish
You don't know who my friends are, so I'd appreciate it if you'd quit claiming
anyone who attacks a fat fuck-up named Scott Bradbury is automatically my
"pal". (What the FBI "proved" to you has very little to do with reality,
given your sorry history.)
81 days, FatSlob.
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>On 27 Jan 2004 10:11:31 -0600, <szkhdyh...@fnord.io.com> Patrick Lee
>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>So, you got one call...I got one from you when you were begging
>>for help because your lover Ellis was tormenting you, remember..
>BTW I forgot to respond to the above:
Obsessive paranoia will do that to you, eh?
>My call was friendly and was as you said whereas the call you and fat pig made
>was not meant to be friendly! Care to deny it?
Care to PROVE it, putz? (You can't prove that any more than you can prove you
actually have the $10,000 you claim to have for your "challenge".)
>I need to get around to transferring that call and making it into a WAV file
>so everyone can hear you and the fat pig acting like kooks!
>
> Tavish
Break a leg. (You've already broken your head.) You'll give everyone else
another reason to listen to you acting like the certifiable kook.
Patrick Keenan
news:coqc10thonvmdmdda...@4ax.com...
> From: "Robert M." <rmar...@msn.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,houston.general
> Subject: Re: Slander of Patrick L Humphrey resumes
>
> It is NOT slander if it is true and it is fully documented too!
>
> References: <e73f388a.04012...@posting.google.com>
> <7d18105np6d76bln5...@4ax.com>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=7d18105np6d76bln5...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
> Anyone wanting to see documented proofs which would stand up in a civil
court
> and to see what I originally posted just click the link above.
>
> On 26 Jan 2004 20:39:38 -0600, <szkisiy...@fnord.io.com> Patrick L.
> Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >"Robert M." <rmar...@msn.com> writes:
> >
> >>Hang in there Pat. The rest of the world is with you.
>
> You certainly are presumptuous when you set yourself up to speak on the
behalf
> of humanity!
>
> >I'm not worried...how could I peep in a SECOND-STORY bathroom window?
>
> You certainly seem to know a lot about where I live and about my residence
and
> you know what that is a sign of don't you?
Yeah, making notes of the guy who has been harassing them. And remember,
you invited them to your town.
>
> Here is a reminder:
And here is a reminder of Mr. Bradbury *offering* what might be seen through
his window - if he had one:
message-ID: 1sp0cvclo39sahhlq...@4ax.com
"...are you interested in the size of my balls (which are quite large due to
my priapism)?"
>
> Here YOU and Sara "Stalker" Salzman are documented paying me a "visit" and
> taking pictures and don't forget you two even called my residence and left
a
> message on my answering machine and it is obvious it wasn't cordial!!!
They came by in response to your invitation to go to your town's courthouse.
They said they were coming; You left town. They drove by your house. Man,
what a crime. Have you contacted your DA? His office is in the
courthouse, if you didn't know.
Perhaps while you visit him you can ask him about what Wire Fraud is.
Now, about that $10,000 you've been publicly offering.. do you have it, or
not? Your challenge has been accepted contingent on your proof of good
faith.
-pk
Patrick Keenan
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:17:17 GMT,
> <e5de94c0e7acb434...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@ . >
wrote:
>
> >Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
>
> DO IT!!!
There's one condition: prove you have the $10,000 first. Have to be sure
your offer isn't fraudulent, now, don't we?
-pk
Barney Fife
<catamont-66DA1F...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <h1sc10dp2brs6gt9e...@4ax.com>,
> Barney Fife <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:17:17 GMT,
>> <e5de94c0e7acb434...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@
>> . > wrote:
>>
>> >Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
>>
>> DO IT!!!
>>
>
>As soon as you produce proof that you have the cash.
Why do I need cash you fat stupid pig? I won't be the one having to dole out! I
KNOW what my own medical record states so are you shits going to cough up a
$1000.00 a piece or not? The burden of proof is on you all to prove Yale told
the truth- when in fact he lied! I know the "Hermann Hospital discharge
diagnosis numbered 50 04882 6 9356" which I personally signed and received a
yellow copy of positively did NOT state "morbid obesity" or the other lies he
told. For a fact there aren't even height of weight fields on it- facts I have
stated since the beginning!
This current worry about whether I have the money or not is a dodge. What it
boils down to- you all aren't worried about winning and NOT getting paid- you
shits are worried about me proving Yale lied and you having to pay me! I have a
MicroTek Scanner still in the box I bought long ago with a SCSI interface which
I am going to try to get working BUT even then if I posted a binary of it you
shits would say I doctored it and remember at one time I even offered to snail
mail Patrick Humphrey a copy of it too! Care to deny it?
It is all in this archive!
Original challenge was made: Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:23:17 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4q0pbtc3gk6oour5opkjkj1q00geehk9n3%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Making False Claims About My Medical Records...
Message-ID: <4q0pbtc3gk6oour5o...@4ax.com>
"NEW CHALLENGE: I will offer $1000.00 to anyone who will step up and
substantiate what Yale F. Edeiken claimed in his post about my Hermann
Hospital discharge diagnosis numbered 50 04882 6 9356."
Excerpts:
Yale claimed said document stated: "According tot he discharge summary, oince of
the diafnoises made by Hermann Hospital was "morbid obesity.".. You have been
tppld to exercise and lose weight... Hermann Hostital listed your height as
6'1" and told you that one of your pronlems wsa "morbid obesity.""
As for Yale's statement: "You have been tppld to exercise and lose
weight"- I was NOT told such and I was NEVER told anything about my weight
and for a fact the discharge summary of Hermann Hospital for my December
22, 1999 discharge date had neither my height nor weight on the document.
The document did not even have fields for height or weight!
The discharge document which has an area on it which says:
"Resumption of Normal Activities" has entered:
Date you can return to work: HOLD
Date you can resume driving a car: HOLD
Date you can resume your normal sexual activities: 12/22/99
(At least they didn't want me to be miserable on top of not being
able to work or drive! :-) Tavish comment)
The release document is dated 12/22/99 and its number is:
50 04882 6 9356
<END>
Patrick if you give me permission in public forum so it is documented I
will snail mail you with your permission a copy of "50 04882 6 9356" and I
want you to carefully look it over to see if it mentions "Morbid Obesity"
or even my height or my weight. The medical document in question does NOT
even have weight NOR height fields on it! Care to look?...
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
>Of course, since you never fixed the broken window you claim happen
>TWO YEARS ago, I sincerely doubt you have it.
Windows have been broken more than once you fat stupid pig and you know it and
thanks again for proof that you stalked me! You admitted to talking pictures of
my residence too and you also made very demeaning remarks such as the above!
You would not have been able to do such at all and neither would filth be making
with FAT remarks if it weren't for your pimp Edeiken! I have found a listening
ear and they are going to get a load of documents very soon. Your pal's legal
future is quite dim. Ethical people who have scruples do NOT tolerate what Yale
did to me!
BTW the agency hearing my complaint isn't elected so it won't be like
James B.Martin who chickened out and was afraid he would lose the Jewish
vote. This agency is above politics and having to worry about elections!
They won't think Yale is so cute when they see how much and for how long
I have been stalked, harassed and defamed as a result to legal system abuse
and he being just an evil lying Jew bastard in the first place!
I sure wish this could be enforced on that fat bastard for each and every
chickenshit thing he has caused me to endure. It would take years to have
that whip make the lashes he so deserves and I would want to video it too!
Deuteronomy 25:1-3 :: New International Version (NIV)
1 When men have a dispute, they are to take it to court and the judges will
decide the case, acquitting the innocent and condemning the guilty.
2 If the guilty man deserves to be beaten, the judge shall make him lie down and
have him flogged in his presence with the number of lashes his crime deserves,
3 but he must not give him more than forty lashes.
<<My oh my your Jews give forty lashes yet the Nazis only made you Jews "Count
25"!>>
WHACK WHACK WHACK LASHES ON THE BACK OF A WICKED ONE!! (And your pal deserves a
damned good flogging BUT too bad no court would have it administered but one can
wish can't they? It would take thousands of lashes to repay for the pure evil he
had waged against me and which I am still suffering from now.)
Proverbs 17:10
A rebuke impresses a man of discernment more than a hundred lashes a fool.
It would take thousands of lashes spread out over much time to possibly impress
Yale!
Now go fist yourself you fat evil lying pig.
>Sara
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=hpa1uv0m63koaqbo4...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She Wrote
The FIST Postings! Date: 17 Dec 2003 19:40:10 GMT
Message-ID: <hpa1uv0m63koaqbo4...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=ige2uvsjk0bfi54at...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She
Wrote The FIST Postings! Date: 18 Dec 2003 06:13:32 GMT
Message-ID: <ige2uvsjk0bfi54at...@4ax.com>
Despite overwhelming evidence Sara "The Fist" will keep repeating
her lies and remain in denial.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
Message-ID: <sschwartz-110...@p14.infinet.com>
Date: 11 Feb 95 13:19:07 GMT
References: <3hf46h$p...@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 19
NNTP-Posting-Host: p14.infinet.com
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
>
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Is Sara "The Whipped" Salzman Still Being Whipped by Her Husband's
Electric Whipping Machine?
Message-ID: <0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Dec 2003 22:00:00 GMT
I.E.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Barney Fife
<mLwRb.4565$qU3.2...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
wrote:
>"Barney Fife" <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote in message
>news:h1sc10dp2brs6gt9e...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:17:17 GMT,
>> <e5de94c0e7acb434...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@ . >
>wrote:
>>
>> >Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
>>
>> DO IT!!!
>
>There's one condition: prove you have the $10,000 first. Have to be sure
>your offer isn't fraudulent, now, don't we?
I made no OFFER!!
Why do I need cash? I won't be the one having to dole out! I KNOW what my own
medical record states so are you shits going to cough up a $1000.00 a piece or
not? The burden of proof is on you all to prove Yale told the truth- when in
fact he lied! I know the "Hermann Hospital discharge diagnosis numbered 50 04882
6 9356" which I personally signed and received a yellow copy of positively did
NOT state "morbid obesity" or the other lies he told. For a fact there aren't
even height of weight fields on it- facts I have stated since the beginning!
This current worry about whether I have the money or not is a dodge. What it
boils down to- you all aren't worried about winning and me not being able to
pay- you shits are worried about me proving Yale lied and you having to pay me!
I have a MicroTek Scanner still in the box I bought long ago with a SCSI
interface which I am going to try to get working BUT even then if I posted a
binary of it you shits would say I doctored it and remember at one time I even
offered to snail mail Patrick Humphrey a copy of it too! Care to deny it?
Now do you wish to attempt to prove Yale actually told the truth when deep down
you know the bastard lied!
No more dodges any of you shits. Try to substantiate what Yale claimed.
BTW Judge Reibman saw my medical record and he saw what Yale claimed it stated
too.
Tavish
>-pk
>
>
>>
>> ~~Yale F. Edeiken is the True Fatboy and Fat Freak~~
TRUE
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: My Former Attorney Confirmed Yale F. "Tubby" Edeiken is a Very Obese
Waddler V2.1 Message-ID: <f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com>
Date: 9 Jul 2003 13:58:44 GMT
<<Special Note: It was because of Yale "Tubby" Edeiken that I am continually
insulted with such names as Fatboy, Fat Freak, Blimpie etc. Because he is a
major fat-slob lard ass and because he knew my former attorney gave me the real
goods on what Yale is like as a person- Tubby decided to project his "morbid
obesity" on to me.>>
--Criminal Yale F. Edeiken's deplorable record:
I.E.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <drGdnbOx5tv...@giganews.com>:
>> As soon as you post proof that you have escrowed the money so I know
>> you aren't going to welsh.
>Your ethnic slur is noted. This Welshman is not amused.
Sorry if you were offended, but:
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=welsh
That's welsh, not Welsh (says Roger, who has a number of the ones with
the capital in his family tree...)
Mishima
Hash: SHA1
Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:<catamont-66DA1F...@news-60.giganews.com>...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In article <h1sc10dp2brs6gt9e...@4ax.com>,
> Barney Fife <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:17:17 GMT,
> > <e5de94c0e7acb434...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@
> > . > wrote:
> >
> > >Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
> >
> > DO IT!!!
> >
>
> As soon as you produce proof that you have the cash.
>
> Of course, since you never fixed the broken window you claim happen
> TWO YEARS ago, I sincerely doubt you have it.
>
> Sara
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
>
> iQA/AwUBQBaFWSdySwjCuT94EQJAoACg1wumpvt40TLZFJ+6/lDtMOlxGVEAn28z
> aFAHtWS4aFl7TeELJo+GzslN
> =RAzO
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Sara (if I may be presumptuous enough to use your first name), it's
good to see you using tools to ensure the authenticity of your posts.
However, I don't know where to get your public key so I can verify
them. If you can pass along this info, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks!
~~~~~~~~~~
Verify my posts: visit http://www.geocities.com/mishima_01
for my public key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) - WinPT 0.7.96rc1
iD8DBQFAFq5hzDoag/n9mIwRAjRjAJ494xxb3bzOLlWdcszA/APFDCLZiQCg1A/W
hZ5my1c9jgAlz1EPqh8RITo=
=eSkg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
BugTrakker
> Hang in there Pat. The rest of the world is with you.
I met Pat H at a Houston Eats gathering. All these sicko stories, are
they about the same Pat H? These stories have been floating around
for years. Are they real? Is he a sicko? Is he weird? Can someone
come clean and tell us the real story? Who is who? What is what? Why
is there so much hate between Pat H and others? Is Pat H really a
peeper?
Confused!
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:35:55 -0700,
><catamont-66DA1F...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>In article <h1sc10dp2brs6gt9e...@4ax.com>,
>> Barney Fife <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:17:17 GMT,
>>> <e5de94c0e7acb434...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@
>>> . > wrote:
>>> >Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
>>> DO IT!!!
>>As soon as you produce proof that you have the cash.
>Why do I need cash you fat stupid pig?
Because I have accepted your challenge, and don't trust you not to
skip out on paying me once I post the proof required.
You *do* have the $10k, don't you?
>I won't be the one having to dole out! I
>KNOW what my own medical record states so are you shits going to cough up a
>$1000.00 a piece or not?
Why should we have to pay anything -- *we're* not the ones making the
challenge?
>The burden of proof is on you all to prove Yale told
>the truth- when in fact he lied!
And I will post that proof, after you prove that you have the $10k you
promised to pay me when I do.
You *do* have the $10k, don't you?
>I know the "Hermann Hospital discharge
>diagnosis numbered 50 04882 6 9356" which I personally signed and received a
>yellow copy of positively did NOT state "morbid obesity" or the other lies he
>told. For a fact there aren't even height of weight fields on it- facts I have
>stated since the beginning!
Nope, your challenge, as stated, only requires proving you morbidly
obese.
Now, do you have the $10k or not?
>This current worry about whether I have the money or not is a dodge. What it
>boils down to- you all aren't worried about winning and NOT getting paid- you
>shits are worried about me proving Yale lied and you having to pay me!
Since paying you was never a part of the challenge, it looks like you
cannot even remember what you fraudulently claimed in those posts. I
have "locally archived" the one which I have accepted, and am waiting
for you to prove that the money has been deposited so I know you won't
also "forget" to pay me.
You *do* have the $10k, don't you?
>I have a
>MicroTek Scanner still in the box I bought long ago with a SCSI interface which
>I am going to try to get working BUT even then if I posted a binary of it you
>shits would say I doctored it and remember at one time I even offered to snail
>mail Patrick Humphrey a copy of it too! Care to deny it?
Care to deny that you have never had any intention of making good on
your part of this challenge?
>It is all in this archive!
>
> Original challenge was made: Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:23:17 GMT
Challenge that Roger has accepted, made much more recently, and will
be quoted in full along with the proof of blubberbury's obesity as
soon as he makes the arrangements to protect us both from fraud by
putting the money in escrow.
>>Of course, since you never fixed the broken window you claim happen
>>TWO YEARS ago, I sincerely doubt you have it.
>Windows have been broken more than once you fat stupid pig and you know it and
>thanks again for proof that you stalked me! You admitted to talking pictures of
>my residence too and you also made very demeaning remarks such as the above!
>You would not have been able to do such at all and neither would filth be making
>with FAT remarks if it weren't for your pimp Edeiken! I have found a listening
>ear and they are going to get a load of documents very soon. Your pal's legal
>future is quite dim. Ethical people who have scruples do NOT tolerate what Yale
>did to me!
>
>BTW the agency hearing my complaint isn't elected so it won't be like
>James B.Martin who chickened out and was afraid he would lose the Jewish
>vote. This agency is above politics and having to worry about elections!
>They won't think Yale is so cute when they see how much and for how long
>I have been stalked, harassed and defamed as a result to legal system abuse
>and he being just an evil lying Jew bastard in the first place!
Nor will they think it was cute when you returned court documents
marked "return to stalker," boasted of having done so -- and then lied
about ever having gotten them.
Not to mention fraudulently offering $10k, nor doing any of the other
things which have already been accepted as truth in Pennsylvania
courts...
>I sure wish this could be enforced on that fat bastard for each and every
>chickenshit thing he has caused me to endure. It would take years to have
>that whip make the lashes he so deserves and I would want to video it too!
And this will be the cherry on that sundae, should fatboy ever grow a
pair and *actually* try to do anything like what he's lying about
having in the works...
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:56:50 -0500,
><mLwRb.4565$qU3.2...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
>wrote:
>>"Barney Fife" <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote in message
>>news:h1sc10dp2brs6gt9e...@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:17:17 GMT,
>>> <e5de94c0e7acb434...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@ . >
>> >wrote:
>>> >Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
>>> DO IT!!!
>>There's one condition: prove you have the $10,000 first. Have to be sure
>>your offer isn't fraudulent, now, don't we?
>I made no OFFER!!
Yes you have -- you have offered $10k to anyone that can substantiate
the claim that you are morbidly obese, and I have archived that offer
locally. As soon as you escrow the cash to protect us both from
fraud, it will be reposted along with my proof.
>Why do I need cash? I won't be the one having to dole out! I KNOW what my own
>medical record states so are you shits going to cough up a $1000.00 a piece or
>not?
That would be not, since no one has offered to pay you *anything*, nor
does your challenge include you being paid under any circumstances.
The apparent inability of your to recall what you have actually
written is the reason the money should be escrowed -- so that you also
don't forget to pay me according to the terms of your challenge.
Joebruno
> >84 days, Blobbo.
>
> Get this, Humphrey is so much in love with Bradbury that he actually
> takes the time to count down the days until he rides through his town.
> Humphrey has had several years to show up in Bradbury's face directly,
It even gets Humphrey
> sexually excited just to think of Bellville, talking about having a
> sexual fetish!
Where do you get this information, idiot?
>
> The truth is, the Police Chief long ago told you and Psycho Sara to
> stop bothering them as they got real police work to work, they told
> you to sue him in civil court.
Sue him for what? How has he cost them any money? Fatboy has to money
to pay a judgement, even if they got one. You really are stupid.
So far, you have chickened out and
> refused to do so.
>
> I be willing to bet my money that your fetish with Bradbury is of the
> homosexual nature.
And just how would we go about proving or disproving that if the bet
was made, idiot?
Sara Salzman
Barney Fife <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote:
> Now go fist yourself you fat evil lying pig.
Thus spoke Scott Bradbury:
"Personal attack is all your kind has."
Lies and smear is all you have which is a sure sign that YOU are the one
who is
the loser!
-and-
"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
"My name is not Bradshit you hooked nosed kike"
"Now go fist yourself hook nose"
"Why don't you ever accept my challenge you dick licker?"
Why won't you accept my challenge you dick nibbler?
Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook nose
Didn't you mean Her Fatness as in your lard assed wife?
He's not a 'groid- he's a hook nosed kike!
Why don't you accept my challenge you filthy hook nosed kike bastard?
you stupid Jewish bitch!
My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!
For the sake of speculation- say that this piece of hog fat was alive
when the nazis were allegedly making soap and candles from Jews-- what
do you think the nazis would get from this sow and her fat globules?
NOW GO FIOST YOURSELF YOU FILTHY WHORE!
Now go fist yourself or engage in some of that "safe torture" posted
about before you perverted lying filthy whore!
Is your obesity why you have to stoop to fisting yourself because a
normal male can't copulate with you- YOUR FATNESS? BTW you still haven't
told us which body orifice it is that you fist and judging by the size
of your hands you must have one big as*hole and/or pu*sy! Do you switch
fist and do both orifices at the same time? Tell us all fister!
Now go fist yurself!
Eat shit you dirty kike bastard!
I will call a fat lying bitch like you anything I please anytime I want!
Now go fist yourself you fat pathetic slob!
You're the one whining Miss Piggy! Now go fist your gaping crack!
Eat shit, choke on it, and die you SoB (Son of Belial)
Care to elaborate you perjurious fat pig slob fister?
BTW I am a male therefore I am not a queen but to a dick lick like you-
Now go fist yourself you fat slob!
I am not a lard ass you peter eater BUT your wife certainly is!
Looks like you're having a major meltdown you fat pathetic slob!
Heed your own advice you cock succker!
Now go fist yourself you fat evil lying pig.
--
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <02bd10l61secscari...@4ax.com>,
Barney Fife <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:56:50 -0500,
> <mLwRb.4565$qU3.2...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan"
> <te...@dev.null>
> wrote:
>
> >"Barney Fife" <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote in message
> >news:h1sc10dp2brs6gt9e...@4ax.com...
> >> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:17:17 GMT,
> >> <e5de94c0e7acb434...@news.teranews.com> Roger
> >> <roger@ . >
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> >Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
> >>
> >> DO IT!!!
> >
> >There's one condition: prove you have the $10,000 first. Have to
> >be sure your offer isn't fraudulent, now, don't we?
>
> I made no OFFER!!
Original challenge was made: Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:23:17 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4q0pbtc3gk6oour5opkjkj1q00geeh
k9n3%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Making False Claims About My Medical
Records...
Message-ID: <4q0pbtc3gk6oour5o...@4ax.com>
"NEW CHALLENGE: I will offer $1000.00 to anyone who will step up and
substantiate what Yale F. Edeiken claimed in his post about my
Hermann
Hospital discharge diagnosis numbered 50 04882 6 9356."
Geee... I see the phrase "I WILL OFFER...." clear as a bell.
Why are you such a liar?
> BTW Judge Reibman saw my medical record and he saw what Yale
> claimed it stated
> too.
>
So now you're claiming Judge Reibman is a liar, too?
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQBa8ICdySwjCuT94EQKpFACfRuJk3TGTXRCxBNa4U/T20IOizn4AoKhj
n6jLLJsJOlCrmyuQN8vLdTlc
=CefN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Sara Salzman
Roger <roger@ . > wrote:
Original challenge was made: Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:23:17 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4q0pbtc3gk6oour5opkjkj1q00geehk9n
3%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Making False Claims About My Medical Records...
Message-ID: <4q0pbtc3gk6oour5o...@4ax.com>
"NEW CHALLENGE: I will offer $1000.00 to anyone who will step up and
substantiate what Yale F. Edeiken claimed in his post about my Hermann
Hospital discharge diagnosis numbered 50 04882 6 9356."
Says nothing about anyone paying Bradbury anything.
Sara
Hilary Ostrov
<05fb0d80abcffc20...@news.teranews.com>, Roger <roger@ .
> wrote:
That may well be; however, considering the context and your usage -
and that your own source also states: "Etymology: probably from Welsh,
adjective" - I believe the following is also worth noting:
http://www.wordorigins.org/wordorw.htm#Welch
<quote>
Welch is an archaic form of Welsh, one that pretty much survives only
in the sense meaning someone who does not fulfill a bet. This usage
dates to around 1857. The origin is obscure, but it undoubtedly
originated as an ethnic slur. The term may derive from an old nursery
rhyme that included the words "Taffy was a Welshman, Taffy was a
thief."
</quote>
I'm Jewish - and have a good number of Jews in my family tree! I
don't particularly appreciate the use of the expression "He "jewed" me
down", so I can well imagine why Mr. Matthews may not be amused. And
with very good reason.
This issue did surface here, circa July '01. I believe Mr. Hall came
up with an emminently suitable substitute: "deadbeat". Seems to me
that the "deadbeat" shoes would fit Bradbury to a T.
hro
--
Hilary Ostrov
E-mail: hos...@telus.net
WWW: http://www3.telus.net/myssiwyg/
The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org/
Patrick Lee Humphrey
It's been passed down into American as "welch", and there are more than a few
Welsh on one side of my family tree. (I've always heard it told that the
Welsh never were good spellers, so I apologize for ignoring *that* sliver of
my heritage. :-)
Patrick Keenan
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:56:50 -0500,
> <mLwRb.4565$qU3.2...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan"
<te...@dev.null>
> wrote:
>
> >"Barney Fife" <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote in message
> >news:h1sc10dp2brs6gt9e...@4ax.com...
> >> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:17:17 GMT,
> >> <e5de94c0e7acb434...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@ . >
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> >Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
> >>
> >> DO IT!!!
> >
> >There's one condition: prove you have the $10,000 first. Have to be
sure
> >your offer isn't fraudulent, now, don't we?
>
> I made no OFFER!!
Oh, yes you have, and repeatedly. Here is one of your dozens:
===================
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4q0pbtc3gk6oour5opkjkj1q00geehk9n3%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Making False Claims About My Medical Records...
Message-ID: <4q0pbtc3gk6oour5o...@4ax.com>
"NEW CHALLENGE: I will offer $1000.00 to anyone who will step up and
substantiate what Yale F. Edeiken claimed in his post about my Hermann
Hospital discharge diagnosis numbered 50 04882 6 9356."
===================
Note that you clearly offer $10,000.
Now, where's the money? You are aware that falsely making such an offer
using is a federal offense, right?
Go ask your DA about "wire fraud". In case you don't know where that is,
it's in your local courthouse.
-pk
<snip crap>
Robert M.
Barney Fife <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote:
>
> It is NOT slander if it is true and it is fully documented too!
But is isn't and isn't.
Barney Fife
bugtr...@aol.com (BugTrakker) wrote:
All is true and has been documented and archived!
See this post:
Subject: Re: Slander of Patrick L Humphrey resumes
Message-ID: <coqc10thonvmdmdda...@4ax.com>
Date: 27 Jan 2004 14:02:38 GMT
and these:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kv3u9v8j5ngjn6fcm1aqqc9fe8etvuaclg%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Patrick L. Humphrey-- A Dangerous Stalker? - How To Identify Stalkers
Info..
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:58:46 -0500
Message-ID: <kv3u9v8j5ngjn6fcm...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ipj8iv08hfma986pntotfots2kjsqe761s%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: All Anyone Needs to Know About Stalker Patrick L. Humphrey..
Message-ID: <ipj8iv08hfma986pn...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=mdlpkvs4hnuftqi5efo33j8brrpd4ub88o%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Did "Methodism" Make Patrick L. Humphrey a Blasphemer of Jesus and a
Hater Pro-Life People?
Message-ID: <mdlpkvs4hnuftqi5e...@4ax.com>
---Undeniable proof Patrick "Peeping Tom" Humphrey has a mental disorder:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
(Archived locally as: PatrickThePeeper)
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
Here is what some experts say about Patrick's behavior:
http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/db/issues/99/10.28/news.peeping.html
(Archived locally as: PLH_Voyeur)
Voyeurism at root of Peeping Tom incidents
CRIME: Cases uncommon on campus; recent arrest one of seven since 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Linh Tat Daily Bruin Contributor Although everyone has heard the term
"Peeping Tom" before, most people may still be in the dark when it comes to
understanding the nature of this criminal offense. Many people may label a
person who secretly observes another undressing or in the nude as a Peeping Tom,
but they do not always consider that those who repeatedly commit this offense
may suffer from a psychological disorder.... <END>
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0responses/2000-0919.resp.html
(Archived locally as: 2000-0919)
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0responses/2000-0919.resp.pdf
(Archived locally as: 2000-0919.resp.pdf)
...In November 1997, after reviewing police reports that implicated petitioner
as a suspect in a "Peeping Tom" incident that occurred in the vicinity of the
rape, NCIS reopened its investigation. Pet. App. 23a. Thereafter, the NCIS
office in Hawaii asked NCIS Special Agent John McNutt, assigned to the NCIS
office in Memphis, Tennessee, to interrogate petitioner, who was living in
Memphis, and to ask him to provide NCIS with a sample of his blood. Id. at 24a.
After learning that petitioner was receiving medical treatment at the
Veteran's Administration (VA) Hospital in Memphis, McNutt contacted the VA and
was allowed to review petitioner's medical records. Pet. App. 24a. During that
review, McNutt learned that petitioner was being treated for diabetes and a
mental disorder.... <END>
Tavish
Patrick Keenan
> On 27 Jan 2004 10:41:24 -0800,
<2c44828d.04012...@posting.google.com>
> bugtr...@aol.com (BugTrakker) wrote:
>
> >"Robert M." <rmar...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<rmarkoff-E12F73...@news05.west.earthlink.net>...
> >> Hang in there Pat. The rest of the world is with you.
> >
> >I met Pat H at a Houston Eats gathering. All these sicko stories, are
> >they about the same Pat H? These stories have been floating around
> >for years. Are they real? Is he a sicko? Is he weird? Can someone
> >come clean and tell us the real story? Who is who? What is what? Why
> >is there so much hate between Pat H and others? Is Pat H really a
> >peeper?
> >
> >Confused!
>
> All is true and has been documented and archived!
>
> See this post:
So, can you prove that you have the $10,000 you've been offering? Your
challenge has been accepted, after all.. contingent on your proving that you
have the cash.
-pk
Barney Fife
<OKwRb.4564$qU3.2...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
wrote:
>"Barney Fife" <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote in message
>news:coqc10thonvmdmdda...@4ax.com...
>> From: "Robert M." <rmar...@msn.com>
>> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,houston.general
>> Subject: Re: Slander of Patrick L Humphrey resumes
>>
>> It is NOT slander if it is true and it is fully documented too!
>>
>> References: <e73f388a.04012...@posting.google.com>
>> <7d18105np6d76bln5...@4ax.com>
>>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=7d18105np6d76bln5...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
>> Anyone wanting to see documented proofs which would stand up in a civil
>> court and to see what I originally posted just click the link above.
>>
>> On 26 Jan 2004 20:39:38 -0600, <szkisiy...@fnord.io.com> Patrick L.
>> Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>
>> >"Robert M." <rmar...@msn.com> writes:
>> >
>> >>Hang in there Pat. The rest of the world is with you.
>>
>> You certainly are presumptuous when you set yourself up to speak on the
>> behalf of humanity!
>>
>> >I'm not worried...how could I peep in a SECOND-STORY bathroom window?
>>
>> You certainly seem to know a lot about where I live and about my residence
>> and you know what that is a sign of don't you?
>
>Yeah, making notes of the guy who has been harassing them.
How have I been harassing them?
>And remember, you invited them to your town.
A LIE!! Show any document where I ever invited Patrick Humphrey to come to my
town or for that fact show where I "invited" Sara Salzman to come to my town and
NO- this was not an "invitation" in the least bit:
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit. I
would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore false
witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the criminal
harassment I have had done to me. I want YOU and Yale to deny causing the
harassment I have been subjected to because of my address being distributed and
the info being used criminally. I want Yale to state his motive for subpoenaing
my medical record and then lying about what it stated.... <END>
>> Here is a reminder:
>
>And here is a reminder of Mr. Bradbury *offering*
How was I "offering" anything?
>what might be seen through his window - if he had one:
>message-ID: 1sp0cvclo39sahhlq...@4ax.com
>
>"...are you interested in the size of my balls (which are quite large due to
>my priapism)?"
Here is the above in actual context:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=1sp0cvclo39sahhlq...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
On 12 May 2003 22:07:15 -0500, <szkk7cv...@fnord.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
<pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Too bad, Scottie -- I knew you don't have the balls of a gnat.
My bathroom has no windows and you're a Peeping Tom too BUT why are you
interested in the size of my balls (which are quite large due to my priapism)?
<END>
>> Here YOU and Sara "Stalker" Salzman are documented paying me a "visit" and
>> taking pictures and don't forget you two even called my residence and left
>> a message on my answering machine and it is obvious it wasn't cordial!!!
>
>They came by in response to your invitation to go to your town's courthouse.
I made no invitation and I did NOT mention Patrick at all!
Once again:
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit. I
would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore false
witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the criminal
harassment I have had done to me. I want YOU and Yale to deny causing the
harassment I have been subjected to because of my address being distributed and
the info being used criminally. I want Yale to state his motive for subpoenaing
my medical record and then lying about what it stated.... <END>
>They said they were coming; You left town.
I was out of town before they showed up unannounced! For the lawsuit to be
refiled- which was the ONLY reason I gave for Yale and Sara Salzamn to come to
my town did not require my physical presence to do such BUT I would be more than
happy to appear in court should they wish to have it re-filed!!!
>They drove by your house.
STALKING and they took pictures too!
>Man, what a crime. Have you contacted your DA? His office is in the
>courthouse, if you didn't know.
I know where it is. I have been there and I personally know the DA.
>Perhaps while you visit him you can ask him about what Wire Fraud is.
Why am I concerned about wire fraud?
>Now, about that $10,000 you've been publicly offering..
I made no public offering you repetitious liar and I have already explained it
to you numerous times! Anyone clicking this link will see so:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0hqc101ip0hnj506o...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: Thus spoke Scott Bradbury
Message-ID: <0hqc101ip0hnj506o...@4ax.com>
Date: 27 Jan 2004 13:37:24 GMT
>do you have it, or not?
Already been explained numerous times you ignoramus and here is a hint from the
above archive:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:55:13 -0500,
<4Z1Rb.21208$Kg6.1...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
wrote:
>Specifically, think of the $10,000 you've publicly offered
I NEVER publicly "OFFERED" money period. I also never engaged in gambling either
though I did use the terminology of "safe bet" which isn't gambling because
unlike "luck", "blind chance", "Lady Luck" or whatever- I know what my medical
record states! I signed it and I have a copy in my possession and I have right
in front of me at this very minute! It positively does NOT state what Yale said
it did! He lied and when people such as your pals keep repeating Yale's lies
they are liars as well. They are too coward to accept the "CHALLENGE" which I
have posted numerous times which I do now:
--To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer
the $10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=5oimrvs7agr9m92kj3q74a22vba99coeos%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: The $10,000 Challenge to Ken McVay aka Re: Harold Covington & Scott
Bradbury: The Blubberbury Twins
Message-ID: <5oimrvs7agr9m92kj...@4ax.com>
References: <bpe9d...@enews3.newsguy.com>
Date: 19 Nov 2003 11:29:26 GMT
Original challenge was made: Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:23:17 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4q0pbtc3gk6oour5opkjkj1q00geehk9n3%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Making False Claims About My Medical Records...
Message-ID: <4q0pbtc3gk6oour5o...@4ax.com>
"NEW CHALLENGE: I will offer $1000.00 to anyone who will step up and
substantiate what Yale F. Edeiken claimed in his post about my Hermann
Hospital discharge diagnosis numbered 50 04882 6 9356."
>Specifically, think of the $10,000 you've publicly offered and over wires
>that cross state lines- Fraudulently, I'd have to say, since you refuse to
>prove you have it.
First I am a private citizen and I am not dealing in a commercial for profit
venture and I made no OFFER! If you think you have a case bring it on and we
will see whose ass gets burned when the judge sees my CHALLENGE, the smear made
against me, and the unethical acts of an officer of the court (Yale F.Edeiken)
who started it all!
>Unless you can prove that you have the money, you may
>well qualify for a federal "wire fraud" investigation,
BRING IT ON!!! They will probably charge you with filing false reports when the
whole truth comes out!
>possibly sped up by your links to Al-Queda supporters.
What links? What support to Al-Queda? You are a liar and smear is all you have!
Care to show any USENET post or web document where I have ever declared MY
support to Al-Queda? You are just like the Children of the Devil YOU support!!
>That could easily win you a new place to live, board included.
Filing false complaints will get you free room and board and engaging in
actionable libel is also not all too wise either you liar and libeler!
>Oh, and if you've made such "challenges" before.. the charges stack.
The CHALLENGE is the burden of proof for the liars to substantiate Yale's lie
and when they can't then each one of them is to give me a $1000.00! PLAIN AND
SIMPLE- EVEN A HARD HEAD LIKE YOU SHOULD GET THE POINT BY NOW!!
<END>
I also stated quite plainly in this post to you which you ignored your agenda:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=02bd10l61secscari26sbbm9dtjsnki4j0%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Re: Patrick L Humphrey sexually stalking Scott Bradbury again
Message-ID: <02bd10l61secscari...@4ax.com>
Date: 27 Jan 2004 18:25:48 GMT
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:56:50 -0500,
<mLwRb.4565$qU3.2...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
wrote:
>"Barney Fife" <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote in message
>news:h1sc10dp2brs6gt9e...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:17:17 GMT,
>> <e5de94c0e7acb434...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@ . > wrote:
>>
>> >Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
>>
>> DO IT!!!
>
>There's one condition: prove you have the $10,000 first. Have to be sure
>your offer isn't fraudulent, now, don't we?
I made no OFFER!!
Why do I need cash? I won't be the one having to dole out! I KNOW what my own
medical record states so are you shits going to cough up a $1000.00 a piece or
not? The burden of proof is on you all to prove Yale told the truth- when in
fact he lied! I know the "Hermann Hospital discharge diagnosis numbered 50 04882
6 9356" which I personally signed and received a yellow copy of positively did
NOT state "morbid obesity" or the other lies he told. For a fact there aren't
even height of weight fields on it- facts I have stated since the beginning!
This current worry about whether I have the money or not is a dodge. What it
boils down to- you all aren't worried about winning and me not being able to
pay- you shits are worried about me proving Yale lied and you having to pay me!
I have a MicroTek Scanner still in the box I bought long ago with a SCSI
interface which I am going to try to get working BUT even then if I posted a
binary of it you shits would say I doctored it and remember at one time I even
offered to snail mail Patrick Humphrey a copy of it too! Care to deny it?
Now do you wish to attempt to prove Yale actually told the truth when deep down
you know the bastard lied!
No more dodges any of you shits. Try to substantiate what Yale claimed.
BTW Judge Reibman saw my medical record and he saw what Yale claimed it stated
too.
Tavish
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
It is not my burden to prove anything. You lying bastards started the lie about
what my medical record states when none of you have seen it! Only Yale saw it
and he lied about what it stated. IOW do you liars have a $1000.00 a piece to
give me when I prove the bastard who has been before the highest court of his
state three times for his unethical acts lied and YES- Yale F. Edeiken has been
"spanked" the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania three times!
I.E.
legal profession doesn't it? Remember he is your pal Patrick Keenan and you take
his words as "Gospel."
>Your challenge has been accepted contingent on your proof of good faith.
I don't have to prove shit to you- you lying son of a bitch! The burden of proof
lies on the evil shit who start lies and spread them!
Care to substantiate this evil lie you originated and are trying to get to
spread now?
You libeled me with:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=4Z1Rb.21208%24Kg6....@news20.bellglobal.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: KeenanLibel)
From: "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Thus spoke Scott Bradbury
Message-ID: <4Z1Rb.21208$Kg6.1...@news20.bellglobal.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:55:13 -0500
"your links to Al-Queda supporters."
<END>
You have libeled me numerous times with that same false accusation too you lying
bastard!
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_epq=Al-Queda&safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_uauthors=te...@dev.null&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=2004&as_maxd=27&as_maxm=1&as_maxy=2004&lr=&hl=en
(Search result archived locally as: KeenanLibels6)
Searched Groups for "Al-Queda" author:te...@dev.null from Jan 1, 2004 to today.
Results 1 - 6 of about 7.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=G0gQb.6820%24rW5.674029%40news20.bellglobal.com&rnum=1
Re: Remember this gem from "irg...@wowmail.com"?
... 4ax.com> Date: 15 Jan 2004 11:11:43 GMT <snippage> Hey, aren't you the guy
from Texas who was so recently seeking the "blessing" of an Al-Queda supporter?
... alt.revisionism - Jan 23, 2004 by Patrick Keenan - View Thread (5 articles)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=Q72Rb.21210%24Kg6.156245%40news20.bellglobal.com&rnum=2
Re: And now a word abou the VERY fake mishima...@aol.com
... meant for Jews. A real patriot there, just the kind of guy to beg
for help from an Al-Queda supporter. Anyway, considering that ...
alt.revisionism - Jan 25, 2004 by Patrick Keenan - View Thread (3 articles)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4Z1Rb.21208%24Kg6.155613%40news20.bellglobal.com&rnum=3
Re: Thus spoke Scott Bradbury
... you can prove that you have the money, you may well qualify for a federal
"wire fraud" investigation, possibly sped up by your links to Al-Queda
supporters. ... alt.revisionism - Jan 25, 2004 by Patrick Keenan - View Thread
(10 articles)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=oS1Rb.21207%24Kg6.154759%40news20.bellglobal.com&rnum=4
Re: PsychoSara and Humphrey were so scared of Tavish
... And you are the guy who discusses his medical records on the net, seeks best
wishes from Al-Queda supporters on the net, and makes likely fraudulent
financial ... alt.revisionism - Jan 25, 2004 by Patrick Keenan - View Thread (9
articles)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=CA_Ob.4897%24rW5.205922%40news20.bellglobal.com&rnum=5
Re: ACTION ALERT! Professor Andrew E. Mathis of Villanova ...
... But I wonder how that'll play in the story in his local paper: not only does
the local boy have links with Al-Queda supporters, he makes bets he can't and
won ... alt.revisionism - Jan 19, 2004 by Patrick Keenan - View Thread (14
articles)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=qlJOb.4468%24rW5.125617%40news20.bellglobal.com&rnum=6
Re: Scott Bradbuiry, abject idiot
... quickly. I can just see the story in your local paper, "Local man
with links to Al-Queda supporters sued". Hope this helps. -pk
alt.revisionism - Jan 18, 2004 by Patrick Keenan - View Thread (63 articles)
BTW you liars mentioned I was SUED but you left out the case against me was
DISMISSED!! Why is that you lying evil bastard?
VCare to substantiate your libel you son of a bitch!? I see what you're doing-
you are trying to have the feds shake me down. You shit posted phoney child porn
ads which gave out my address which had me visited by feds twice and which I was
exonerated on twice! You lying devils can't refute me so you devils have to
fabricate lies and then get me unfairly visited by law enoforcement! They file
it away and believe me when they have had enough of the crap and wasting
resources to harass a private citizen who has violated no law and who isn't a
terrorist then they are going to go after the evil shit who initiated the
responses in the first place!
NOTICE the news groups I have posted to Patrick? I am not afraid so now that you
have started another evil libel against me why don't you try to substantiate it?
Perhaps they will look you up as being an instigator and for making false claims
regarding terrorism!!
YOU AND YOUR FELLOW LOSERS HAVE YET TO REFUTE ME SO ALL OF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO
LIES AND SMEAR!! People see it and take note who is doing it and sooner or later
your methods are going to backfire on you in a very major way!
Tavish
BTW you lying bastard try refuting what I posted in these archives seeing how
these are some of the reasons why the current smear campaign against me is being
waged:
--Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He Denies
Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund?--
NEWER UPDATED VERSION:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=f7murv0qqpmcfa2ldce7epo9gtg5am23rl%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: UPDATED The Nizkor Project Director is Lying About Funds He Has NOT
Reported to CCRA!! SAAF Report for 2002 Is Further Proof! R_1122
Message-ID: <f7murv0qqpmcfa2ld...@4ax.com>
Date: 22 Nov 2003 13:01:32 GMT
AKA "Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He
Denies Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"
COMICAL DENIAL OF DOCUMENTED FACTS:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=nlol001kbp1kh698t...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: Ken McVay's (Director of The Nizkor Project) $50,000+ Tax Evasion
Exposed aka Re: Gosh Darn Uppity Juice!
Message-ID: <nlol001kbp1kh698t...@4ax.com>
Date: 18 Jan 2004 21:17:40 GMT
OLDER ORIGINAL VERSION:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=07qc8vguuom77pvmugliksb3dmdf8pp82r%404ax.com&rnum=6
Subject: Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He
Denies Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund
Message-ID: <07qc8vguuom77pvmu...@4ax.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:22 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4186tvsr4d3oiodp2nibbuvuj91rakvimb%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: UPDATED! B'nai Brith Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge
Against Capitalism, and Christianity V2.0 R_1207
Message-ID: <4186tvsr4d3oiodp2...@4ax.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2003 12:48:39 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=5rhktv483m9oofgqt8goir93o4pm08ht49%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: 3 Major Jewish Organizations Engage in Holocaust Denial...
Message-ID: <5rhktv483m9oofgqt...@4ax.com>
Date: 12 Dec 2003 22:57:48 GMT
If Jews are allowed to call a historic event a "Holocaust" based on Jews being
tortured, imprisoned, and executed by Nazis then why can't Christians claim
Jews had "Holocausts" against non-Jews/Christians seeing how the 1st Century
Pharisees and the 20th Century Jewish led Bolshevists tortured, imprisoned, and
executed Christians/non-Jews. Jews also deny these other "Holocausts" so going
by their standards they are "Holocaust Deniers" and should be prosecuted for
Holocaust Denial"and "Minimalizing the Holocaust[s])" as well!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=1i7810p7itigphaaq...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Post-Soviet Religion (What Communists did to Christians) V2.0a S_0125
Message-ID: <1i7810p7itigphaaq...@4ax.com>
Date: 25 Jan 2004 19:53:30 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=ft2a0097vngqsbj9l...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: "All non-Jews will willfully serve (the Divine purpose of) the Jewish
people." (In The Rebbe's Very Own EXACT Words!!) V2.1c S_0114
Message-ID: <ft2a0097vngqsbj9l...@4ax.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2004 10:39:32 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=u626vv814v0dt9raqv17ede0h4536l51ag%404ax.com&rnum=10&filter=0
Subject: V3.0e Forefathers of the Soviet State and Anti-Christ Communism R_1231
Message-ID: <u626vv814v0dt9raq...@4ax.com>
Date: 31 Dec 2003 17:34:02 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=vf6a00t3gfv5fs3mt...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: UPDATED LINKS!! About Kashrus and Supervision - What Jews Teach
Concerning non-Jews (In Their Own Words Series) V2.0 S_0114
Message-ID: <vf6a00t3gfv5fs3mt...@4ax.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2004 10:40:16 GMT
>-pk= LIAR
Allan Matthews
> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Allan Matthews wrote
> in message <drGdnbOx5tv...@giganews.com>:
>
> >In article <8bd0815bfb8a3373...@news.teranews.com>, Roger
> ><roger@ . > says...
>
> >> As soon as you post proof that you have escrowed the money so I know
> >> you aren't going to welsh.
>
> >Your ethnic slur is noted. This Welshman is not amused.
>
> Sorry if you were offended, but:
> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=welsh
>
> That's welsh, not Welsh (says Roger, who has a number of the ones with
> the capital in his family tree...)
The lack of a capital W makes no difference. The English began using
'welsh' in this way due to their prejudice that all Welshmen were
thieves.
Were you to use this word this way in most of Wales you'd be putting
yourself in deep doo doo.
allan
--
allan_matthews[at]bigfoot[dot]com
=========================================
Cicero Mayor Anton Cermak was killed on
stage in Miami by a gunman who escaped
- Three more BrunoMoron "gems"
=========================================
http://www.allan.matthews.name
Allan Matthews
> (I've always heard it told that the
> Welsh never were good spellers, so I apologize for ignoring *that* sliver of
> my heritage. :-)
True Welshman spell Wales - Cymru.
allan
--
allan_matthews[at]bigfoot[dot]com
=========================================
"Alt.revisionism is owned by WebTV, asshole!"
- the BrunoBot at his best
=========================================
http://www.allan.matthews.name
Patrick Keenan
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:56:14 -0500,
> <OKwRb.4564$qU3.2...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan"
<te...@dev.null>
> wrote:
>
> >"Barney Fife" <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote in message
> >news:coqc10thonvmdmdda...@4ax.com...
> >> From: "Robert M." <rmar...@msn.com>
> >> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,houston.general
> >> Subject: Re: Slander of Patrick L Humphrey resumes
> >>
> >> It is NOT slander if it is true and it is fully documented too!
> >>
> >> References: <e73f388a.04012...@posting.google.com>
> >> <7d18105np6d76bln5...@4ax.com>
> >>
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=7d18105
> >> Anyone wanting to see documented proofs which would stand up in a civil
> >> court and to see what I originally posted just click the link above.
> >>
> >> On 26 Jan 2004 20:39:38 -0600, <szkisiy...@fnord.io.com> Patrick
L.
> >> Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >"Robert M." <rmar...@msn.com> writes:
> >> >
> >> >>Hang in there Pat. The rest of the world is with you.
> >>
> >> You certainly are presumptuous when you set yourself up to speak on the
> >> behalf of humanity!
> >>
> >> >I'm not worried...how could I peep in a SECOND-STORY bathroom window?
> >>
> >> You certainly seem to know a lot about where I live and about my
residence
> >> and you know what that is a sign of don't you?
> >
> >Yeah, making notes of the guy who has been harassing them.
>
> How have I been harassing them?
Do pay attention.
>
> >And remember, you invited them to your town.
>
> A LIE!! Show any document where I ever invited Patrick Humphrey to come to
my
> town or for that fact show where I "invited" Sara Salzman to come to my
town and
> NO- this was not an "invitation" in the least bit:
Sure looks like one to me.
And it's the USA, so he can't possibly go to your town. The nerve of the
guy... there oughta be a law.
"Mommy! He looked at me!"
> Once again:
>
> On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
wrote:
> <catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
> "Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
> My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
> (my jurisdiction).
> You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against
me
> with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit.
I
> would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore
false
> witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the
criminal
> harassment I have had done to me. I want YOU and Yale to deny causing the
> harassment I have been subjected to because of my address being
distributed and
> the info being used criminally. I want Yale to state his motive for
subpoenaing
> my medical record and then lying about what it stated.... <END>
>
> >They said they were coming; You left town.
>
> I was out of town before they showed up unannounced!
I seem to recall postings announcing their imminent arrival.
>For the lawsuit to be
> refiled-
Why would it be re-filed if you had "won"?
> which was the ONLY reason I gave for Yale and Sara Salzamn to come to
> my town did not require my physical presence to do such BUT I would be
more than
> happy to appear in court should they wish to have it re-filed!!!
So how would you know in advance what they were there for?
> >They drove by your house.
>
> STALKING and they took pictures too!
Need a tissue?
> >Man, what a crime. Have you contacted your DA? His office is in the
> >courthouse, if you didn't know.
>
> I know where it is. I have been there and I personally know the DA.
Do you, now.
>
> >Perhaps while you visit him you can ask him about what Wire Fraud is.
>
> Why am I concerned about wire fraud?
Ask him.
>
> >Now, about that $10,000 you've been publicly offering..
>
> I made no public offering you repetitious liar and I have already
explained it
> to you numerous times! Anyone clicking this link will see so:
Yes, they'll see you offering $10,000 - as you do again, in this very post.
And you have yet to answer - it's yes or no - whether you have the cash to
back up your "$10,000 challenge".
Why is this so hard for you?
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0hqc101ip0hnj506o...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
> Subject: Re: Thus spoke Scott Bradbury
> Message-ID: <0hqc101ip0hnj506o...@4ax.com>
> Date: 27 Jan 2004 13:37:24 GMT
>
> >do you have it, or not?
>
> Already been explained numerous times you ignoramus and here is a hint
from the
> above archive:
>
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:55:13 -0500,
> <4Z1Rb.21208$Kg6.1...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan"
<te...@dev.null>
> wrote:
>
> >Specifically, think of the $10,000 you've publicly offered
>
> I NEVER publicly "OFFERED" money period.
Though you do exactly that a few lines down...
Can you prove that you have it?
> I also never engaged in gambling either
> though I did use the terminology of "safe bet" which isn't gambling
because
> unlike "luck", "blind chance", "Lady Luck" or whatever- I know what my
medical
> record states!
That's nice. You also know that you've been offering $10,000. Can you
prove you have it, or is your offer fraudulent?
> I signed it and I have a copy in my possession and I have right
> in front of me at this very minute! It positively does NOT state what Yale
said
> it did! He lied and when people such as your pals keep repeating Yale's
lies
> they are liars as well. They are too coward to accept the "CHALLENGE"
which I
> have posted numerous times which I do now:
But you just said that you've never offered money. Now, you're saying that
you've offered it numerous times.
>
> --To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer
> the $10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=5oimrvs7agr9m92kj3q74a22vba99coeos%404ax.com&rnum=1
> Subject: The $10,000 Challenge to Ken McVay aka Re: Harold Covington &
Scott
> Bradbury: The Blubberbury Twins
> Message-ID: <5oimrvs7agr9m92kj...@4ax.com>
> References: <bpe9d...@enews3.newsguy.com>
> Date: 19 Nov 2003 11:29:26 GMT
> Original challenge was made: Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:23:17 GMT
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4q0pbtc3gk6oour5opkjkj1q00geehk9n3%404ax.com&rnum=1
> Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Making False Claims About My Medical Records...
> Message-ID: <4q0pbtc3gk6oour5o...@4ax.com>
> "NEW CHALLENGE: I will offer $1000.00 to anyone who will step up and
> substantiate what Yale F. Edeiken claimed in his post about my Hermann
> Hospital discharge diagnosis numbered 50 04882 6 9356."
>
> >Specifically, think of the $10,000 you've publicly offered and over wires
> >that cross state lines- Fraudulently, I'd have to say, since you refuse
to
> >prove you have it.
>
> First I am a private citizen and I am not dealing in a commercial for
profit
> venture and I made no OFFER!
You *just* said that you did.
"To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer the
$10,000.00 Challenge "
Look familiar?
> If you think you have a case bring it on and we
> will see whose ass gets burned when the judge sees my CHALLENGE,
Which offers $10,000. Do you have the money or not? It's a simple
question.
> the smear made
> against me, and the unethical acts of an officer of the court (Yale
F.Edeiken)
> who started it all!
>
> >Unless you can prove that you have the money, you may
> >well qualify for a federal "wire fraud" investigation,
>
> BRING IT ON!!! They will probably charge you with filing false reports
And what reports will those be?
> when the whole truth comes out!
Do you have the $10,000 for your "challenge", or not?
>
> >possibly sped up by your links to Al-Queda supporters.
>
>What links? What support to Al-Queda? You are a liar and smear is all you
have!
> Care to show any USENET post or web document where I have ever declared MY
> support to Al-Queda? You are just like the Children of the Devil YOU
support!!
You've sought help and "best wishes" from Mr. Michael, who you know has
supported Al-Queda, and who you know has applauded the murder of Americans.
Don't you remember?
> >That could easily win you a new place to live, board included.
>
> Filing false complaints will get you free room and board and engaging in
> actionable libel is also not all too wise either you liar and libeler!
I've only been using your words, Mr. Bradbury. That's hardly libel.
Now speaking of falsehoods, can you prove that you have the $10,000 to back
up your challenge?
> >Oh, and if you've made such "challenges" before.. the charges stack.
>
> The CHALLENGE is the burden of proof for the liars to substantiate Yale's
lie
> and when they can't then each one of them is to give me a $1000.00!
So that's your plan - to get $1000 from each of several people without being
able to back up your own position.
> PLAIN AND SIMPLE- EVEN A HARD HEAD LIKE YOU SHOULD GET THE POINT BY NOW!!
You know, you've just set up another of the conditions for wire fraud.
Now, do you have the money to back up your "challenge" or not?
> <END>
>
> I also stated quite plainly in this post to you which you ignored your
agenda:
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=02bd10l61secscari26sbbm9dtjsnki4j0%404ax.com&rnum=1
> Subject: Re: Patrick L Humphrey sexually stalking Scott Bradbury again
> Message-ID: <02bd10l61secscari...@4ax.com>
> Date: 27 Jan 2004 18:25:48 GMT
>
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:56:50 -0500,
> <mLwRb.4565$qU3.2...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan"
<te...@dev.null>
> wrote:
>
> >"Barney Fife" <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote in message
> >news:h1sc10dp2brs6gt9e...@4ax.com...
> >> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:17:17 GMT,
> >> <e5de94c0e7acb434...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@ . >
wrote:
> >>
> >> >Nup. That would be you, and I can prove it.
> >>
> >> DO IT!!!
> >
> >There's one condition: prove you have the $10,000 first. Have to be
sure
> >your offer isn't fraudulent, now, don't we?
>
> I made no OFFER!!
But you *just* said you've done so "numerous times".
> Why do I need cash? I won't be the one having to dole out! I KNOW what my
own
> medical record states so are you shits going to cough up a $1000.00 a
piece or
> not?
Because you've made the offer of $10,000. Which has been accepted - now
prove you have the money. You do have it, don't you?
> The burden of proof is on
You, at the moment, if you want your "challenge" to be taken seriously.
Prove that you have the $10,000 you've been offering.
Speaking of dodges, your challenge has already been accepted. Now, prove
that you have the $10,000.
> BTW Judge Reibman saw my medical record and he saw what Yale claimed it
stated
> too.
>
> Tavish
>
> ~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
>
> It is not my burden to prove anything.
So you don't actually have the $10,000 to offer.
>You lying bastards started the lie about
> what my medical record states when none of you have seen it! Only Yale saw
it
> and he lied about what it stated. IOW do you liars have a $1000.00 a piece
to
> give me when I prove the bastard who has been before the highest court of
his
> state three times for his unethical acts lied and YES- Yale F. Edeiken has
been
> "spanked" the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania three times!
So what? How does that affect your offering $10,000? Either you have the
cash to back it up or you don't.
<snip>
>>Your challenge has been accepted contingent on your proof of good faith.
>
> I don't have to prove shit to you- you lying son of a bitch!
If you want your "challenge" to be taken seriously, you do.
> The burden of proof
> lies on the evil shit who start lies and spread them!
Like the lie that you can honestly make a $10,000 "challenge"?
> Care to substantiate this evil lie you originated and are trying to get to
> spread now?
It's been done. You've not been paying attention, have you?
>
> You libeled me with:
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=4Z1Rb.21208%24Kg6....@news20.bellglobal.com&lr=&hl=en
> (Archived locally as: KeenanLibel)
> From: "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Thus spoke Scott Bradbury
> Message-ID: <4Z1Rb.21208$Kg6.1...@news20.bellglobal.com>
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:55:13 -0500
>
> "your links to Al-Queda supporters."
>
> <END>
>
> You have libeled me numerous times with that same false accusation too you
lying
> bastard!
So sue me if you think your own words are false. Or do you not have the
money?
Is that why you are trying to get $1,000 from these people, so you can pay
attorney's fees?
Because I'm not talking about Mr. Eideken's suit.
> VCare to substantiate your libel you son of a bitch!? I see what you're
doing-
> you are trying to have the feds shake me down. You shit posted phoney
child porn
Did I, now? Prove it.
> ads which gave out my address which had me visited by feds twice and which
I was
> exonerated on twice! You lying devils can't refute me so you devils have
to
> fabricate lies
They are your words, Mr. Bradbury. You've sought "best wishes" from
someone you know applauded the murder of American citizens, and who
expressed support for Al-Queda. It's very simple.
> and then get me unfairly visited by law enoforcement! They file
> it away and believe me when they have had enough of the crap and wasting
> resources to harass a private citizen who has violated no law and who
isn't a
> terrorist then they are going to go after the evil shit who initiated the
> responses in the first place!
You, you mean?
>
> NOTICE the news groups I have posted to Patrick? I am not afraid so now
that you
> have started another evil libel against me why don't you try to
substantiate it?
I've done so. Haven't you been paying attention?
> Perhaps they will look you up as being an instigator and for making false
claims
> regarding terrorism!!
>
> YOU AND YOUR FELLOW LOSERS HAVE YET TO REFUTE ME SO ALL OF YOU HAVE TO
RESORT TO
> LIES AND SMEAR!!
What, like the lies and smear you send to the IRS and CCRA?
>People see it and take note who is doing it and sooner or later
> your methods are going to backfire on you in a very major way!
>
> Tavish
>
> BTW you lying bastard try refuting what I posted in these archives seeing
how
> these are some of the reasons why the current smear campaign against me is
being
> waged:
Yes, yes, we've seen this crap before. Neither the CCRA or the IRS
believed you, either.
<snip crap>
>-pk= LIAR
Speaking of "liar", do you have the $10,000 you're offering, or not?
It's a simple, yes or no answer I'm looking for here.
-pk
Barney Fife
<mgIRb.4868$qU3.3...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
wrote:
And you keep forgetting whether I have cash or not doesn't matter. I know what
my medical record stated and that Yale lied. Are you prepared to cough up a
$1000.00 to me when you try to prove what Yale said was true and is proved to be
the liar he is?
>-pk
Ken Lewis
<allan_m...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>In article <szkd695...@fnord.io.com>, pat...@io.com says...
>> (I've always heard it told that the
>> Welsh never were good spellers, so I apologize for ignoring *that* sliver of
>> my heritage. :-)
>True Welshman spell Wales - Cymru.
Just goes to show that true Welshmen can't spell. :-)
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:02:59 -0500,
><mgIRb.4868$qU3.3...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
>wrote:
>>So, can you prove that you have the $10,000 you've been offering? Your
>>challenge has been accepted, after all.. contingent on your proving that you
>>have the cash.
>And you keep forgetting whether I have cash or not doesn't matter.
... except to show that you never meant to make good on your so-called
challenge ...
>I know what
>my medical record stated and that Yale lied. Are you prepared to cough up a
>$1000.00 to me when you try to prove what Yale said was true and is proved to be
>the liar he is?
No one has ever made any offers to pay you anything, nor was this ever
a part of your dishonestly offered challenge until *after* I had
already accepted.
This is a yes or no question, fatboy: do you have the $10k or not?
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Allan Matthews wrote
>> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>> someone claiming to be Allan Matthews wrote
>> in message <drGdnbOx5tv...@giganews.com>:
>> >In article <8bd0815bfb8a3373...@news.teranews.com>, Roger
>> ><roger@ . > says...
>> >> As soon as you post proof that you have escrowed the money so I know
>> >> you aren't going to welsh.
>> >Your ethnic slur is noted. This Welshman is not amused.
>> Sorry if you were offended, but:
>> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=welsh
>>
>> That's welsh, not Welsh (says Roger, who has a number of the ones with
>> the capital in his family tree...)
>The lack of a capital W makes no difference.
Except to make it not an ethnic reference in the form of a (proper)
noun, but the use of a generally accepted verb.
>The English began using
>'welsh' in this way due to their prejudice that all Welshmen were
>thieves.
That's one possible etymology for a term that we don't *know* the
genesis of.
Another strong possibility is that its use evolved from "wealh,"
meaning specifically non-Saxon (that is to say, stranger or foreigner)
according to Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.
Am I now xenophobic as well?
>Were you to use this word this way in most of Wales you'd be putting
>yourself in deep doo doo.
Not that I recall noticing, but then I cannot specifically recall
using the term while there.
Bottom line, if the term is that offensive to you, I shan't use it
again -- but your claim that it *must* be an ethnic slur is nothing
more than your *own* prejudices in action.
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>>> >Confused!
>>> See this post:
Since no one's offered to pay you ANYTHING to do your work for you, Fat Slob
of Bellville, can we take your refusal to answer a simple question as a tacit
admission that you never had $10,000 to offer in the first place? You really
might want to look at the Federal sanctions for "wire fraud", because (your
psychotic delusions notwithstanding) you are NOT exempt from being subject to
the law.
80 days, Liar of Bellville. Better get a move on -- you'll need that long to
waddle up the hill to the courthouse.
Barney Fife
<JsJRb.4879$qU3.3...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
wrote:
That is not an answer. How have I been harassing them? You made the accusaytion
you lying son of a bitch so offer examples and realm proof! You are good at
making accusations and dodging issues.
>> >And remember, you invited them to your town.
>>
>> A LIE!! Show any document where I ever invited Patrick Humphrey to come to
>> my town or for that fact show where I "invited" Sara Salzman to come to my
>> town and NO- this was not an "invitation" in the least bit:
>
>Sure looks like one to me.
I hardly think enouraging liars and perjurers to ahve the failed lawsuit against
me re-filed is an invitation and note they haven't done and for a fact the lying
bastard who lost his apeal because of his DISMISSED lawsuit against me hasn't
been posting in USENET since! I wonder why? As thois archive more than
adequatelu proves I was very willing for the whole lawsuit to go back to court
and proceed to square one! care to deny I posted this way back then?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=sq4v2us0odig5nhq79f6crk7a2e7lsqh1s%404ax.com&rnum=6&filter=0
Subject: Why Yale F. Edeiken LOST His Appeal..
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:30:59 -0600
Message-ID: <sq4v2us0odig5nhq7...@4ax.com>
IOW I am not the coward. I am not the one who high tailed and has to use proxies
to speak through such as Yaleis obviously doing now! Tell him I really wish hje
would re-file his perjurious lawsuit in my county at my courthouse and we will
go through it one accusation right after another in front of a judge and a jury
of my peers.
Care to deny the following is filled with perjury and fabricated evidence?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
Care to deny Yale F. Edeiken abused information he subpoenaed for criminal
purposes as the following proves?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>
I AM NOT AFRAID TO HAVE THE ABOVE GO BEFORE A JUDGE AGAIN- WHY IS YALE AFRAID?
WHY DID HE GO INTO HIDING?
See how deceitful you are! Did I say he can't come to my town!? NO!
Have I invited him to come tomy town? NO!!! Have I invited him to stalk me,
intrude ikn my life and to take pictures of my residence? NO!!!
R3emember Patrick Keenan- a lot of people may be reading this post today,
tomorrow and in the future as an archived posts and I know some of my posts are
now being feartured at someweb sites as examples of how people like you and
yours operate. If you all can'tbe honest in these trivial and obvious matters
then why should YOUR words be taken seriously as reagrds to historical events
such as WW II and the "Holocaust"? I don't believe one damned things ypour pals
post regarding Nazi atrocities! WHY? I know how they make up lies to prove their
point or to further their agenda! Here is one of your fellow nitwits exposing
himself for what he is:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=e3bmvvcsor28r7sn5kisjtvhi33q15s1co%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Michael Ragland's History of Dementia Documented (As Well as Some of
His Fellows) Message-ID: <e3bmvvcsor28r7sn5...@4ax.com>
Date: 6 Jan 2004 22:56:06 GMT
(Brief excerpt- Click link above for the rest of the story)
From: Micha...@webtv.net (Michael Ragland)
Subject: Re: I'M BORED WITH HEARING ABOUT FUCKING AUSTRIA
Date: 2000/02/08
Message-ID: <8537-38A...@storefull-628.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
"Now, I will tell you something Mr. Michael which may amaze you. People
occasionally tell half-truths and lie about things. Make sure to quote
me Mr. Michael. I will be disappointed if you don't. Sometimes telling
half-truths, white lies, etc. is important for self-preservation and to
achieve certain ends." <END>
>> I made no invitation and I did NOT mention Patrick at all!
>
>And it's the USA, so he can't possibly go to your town.
>
>The nerve of the guy... there oughta be a law.
>
>"Mommy! He looked at me!"
Your stupidity reflects negatively on you and it bolsters my arguments against
my oposition! Patrick L. Humphrey is a self confessed "Peeping Tom":
>> Once again:
>>
>> On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
>wrote:
>> <catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
>> "Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
>> My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
>> (my jurisdiction).
>> You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against
>> me with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit.
>> I would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore
>> false witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the
>> criminal harassment I have had done to me. I want YOU and Yale to deny causing the
>> harassment I have been subjected to because of my address being
>> distributed and the info being used criminally. I want Yale to state his motive for
>> subpoenaing my medical record and then lying about what it stated.... <END>
>>
>> >They said they were coming; You left town.
>>
>> I was out of town before they showed up unannounced!
>
>I seem to recall postings announcing their imminent arrival.
Seem to recall? It doesn't matter! My presence wasn't required for the lawsuit
to be re-filed BUT I would be very glad to make my appearence in court should
they be bold enough to do so!
>>For the lawsuit to be refiled-
>
>Why would it be re-filed if you had "won"?
It was DISMISSED in my favor and most people claim that is winning but liars and
losers lik,e you claim it was dismissd on a technicality and that I didn't
win--sonow I say- wekk then get Yale to re-file and we will all see who wins for
sure hands down!
>> which was the ONLY reason I gave for Yale and Sara Salzamn to come to
>> my town did not require my physical presence to do such BUT I would be
>> more than happy to appear in court should they wish to have it re-filed!!!
>
>So how would you know in advance what they were there for?
I didn't know in advance you fool! They blabbed later and I then stated the ONLY
purpose was for the lawuist to be re-filed not to hear a fat pig bitch rant and
rave!
>> >They drove by your house.
>>
>> STALKING and they took pictures too!
>
>Need a tissue?
Funny you try to be jovial about stalking BUT I bet if I were to do the same to
Sara you all would be screaming bloody murder!
>> >Man, what a crime. Have you contacted your DA? His office is in the
>> >courthouse, if you didn't know.
>>
>> I know where it is. I have been there and I personally know the DA.
>
>Do you, now.
I have known for years!
BTW here is some more of your pals' damage control slam dunked:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=m1gmivkv3ktp8qlh3j375tfhttrlaolk36%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Answering Partrick's Lies and Defamation
Message-ID: <m1gmivkv3ktp8qlh3...@4ax.com>
Date: 2 Aug 2003 04:38:42 GMT
On 01 Aug 2003 21:44:49 -0500, <szkadas...@fnord.io.com> Patrick L.
Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>He keeps posting what he claims are threats I made and keeps saying
>>they've been referred to the cops. When I spoke to the FBI agent a few
>>years back, he told me law enforcement agencies have the authority to
>>contact my ISP and get my physical address.How come none of these cops
>>have come to arrest me or even advise me? They haven't sent me a
>>letter or called me on the phone, either.
It takes time and for a fact you have been reported.
>>There are two possibilities:
>>(1)He never sent them anything
>
>...and that is very likely what happened, given that he's already on record as
>lying about what he's allegedly said to his county's DA.
>
>>(2)They looked at his stuff, decided they were not really threats, and
>>laughed Fatboy off. Legally, a threat is a statement of intent of the
>>form "I will do ......".
>
>Fortunately for the rest of his county, Bradbury's been enough of a pest to
>have more than a few records of him in his county law enforcement's archives.
Care to attempt to substantiate that smear? The only record on me is when I
assisted the DA in busting a con-artists who was ripping people off. I was wired
for sound and acted like a customer and got the goods on the guy who is no
longer around. Other than me providing evidence for the prosecution there is
nothing else other than I am being harassed along with numerous call traces made
because of death threats.
>They're limited in what they can do, but they're well aware of his history,
>and given Bradbury's stupidity and the laws of probability, it's only a matter
>of time before he manages to cross the line and get the law involved.
They have been advised of your firing from Rice University and how their
investigator contacted me for examples of your posts. Shortly after you were
terminated.
>>I did receive a threatening email a few years back and I went to the
>>FBI with it. I had the guy's real name and address. The FBI took down
>>my report but did absolutely nothing about it. The agent warned me
>>they are so busy that many genuine threats never get action.They have
>>to allocate their limited time and staff to the more serious ones.
You just answered you own question moron. You got one threat BUT I have received
many which raises the priority a notch or two.
>His county's agencies aren't that occupied (though as part of the Houston
>metro area, they're inevitably in the path of the city's expansion), but
>they're familiar enough with his tactics to not regard him as credible in any
>claims he might make.
Wishful thinking and a defamation on your part
>The best quote of our visit to his little town came from one of the law-enforcement
>people: "We've got an opinion of Bradbury, but we wouldn't use it in mixed company.")
So you say! Care to name the person? Sara won't!
>-PLH, who may start making visits to Austin via Scott's little crossroads
Tavish
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
>> >Perhaps while you visit him you can ask him about what Wire Fraud is.
>>
>> Why am I concerned about wire fraud?
>
>Ask him.
I have no reason to ask him.
>> >Now, about that $10,000 you've been publicly offering..
>>
>> I made no public offering you repetitious liar and I have already
>> explained it to you numerous times! Anyone clicking this link will see so:
>
>Yes, they'll see you offering $10,000 - as you do again, in this very post.
I made no OFFER.The term OFFER iis your term and I have already addressed the
isssue numerous times you hard head!
I.E.
--Patrick Keenan, Liar, Libeler, and Smear Agent's M.O.~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=d9ne10hmhv2q59acl...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: Slander of Patrick L Humphrey resumes
Message-ID: <d9ne10hmhv2q59acl...@4ax.com>
Date: 28 Jan 2004 06:54:21 GMT
<<Patrick Keenan has yet to substantiate his libel and has yet to substantiate
lies he has aided in spreading.>>
If yiou thinkk I have engaged in wire fraud then report me! I implore you todo
such and notice the news groups this is till being osted to! Filing false
reports is a crme BUT you are a Canadian so I don't know how it wouldpan out.
>And you have yet to answer - it's yes or no - whether you have the cash to
>back up your "$10,000 challenge".
>
>Why is this so hard for you?
Been answered numerous times and you're too stupid to get the sense of it!
--Patrick Keenan, Liar, Libeler, and Smear Agent's M.O.~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=d9ne10hmhv2q59acl...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: Slander of Patrick L Humphrey resumes
Message-ID: <d9ne10hmhv2q59acl...@4ax.com>
Date: 28 Jan 2004 06:54:21 GMT
<<Patrick Keenan has yet to substantiate his libel and has yet to substantiate
lies he has aided in spreading.>>
Every time you act like a pinhead I will just post the above stock answer which
expalins it all! You liars make accusations and don't prove them and then you
demand the victim of your lies to prove they are false! I say- DROP DEAD!
>http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0hqc101ip0hnj506o...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
>> Subject: Re: Thus spoke Scott Bradbury
>> Message-ID: <0hqc101ip0hnj506o...@4ax.com>
>> Date: 27 Jan 2004 13:37:24 GMT
>>
>> >do you have it, or not?
>>
>> Already been explained numerous times you ignoramus and here is a hint
>> from the above archive:
>>
>> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:55:13 -0500,
>> <4Z1Rb.21208$Kg6.1...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan"
>> <te...@dev.null> wrote:
>>
>> >Specifically, think of the $10,000 you've publicly offered
>>
>> I NEVER publicly "OFFERED" money period.
>
>Though you do exactly that a few lines down...
LIAR!!
>Can you prove that you have it?
>
>> I also never engaged in gambling either though I did use the terminology of "safe bet" which isn't gambling
>> because unlike "luck", "blind chance", "Lady Luck" or whatever- I know what my
>> medical record states!
>
>That's nice. You also know that you've been offering $10,000. Can you
>prove you have it, or is your offer fraudulent?
I made no OFFER!! can you prove the lies you and your pals are sopreading are
true? Answer: NO you can't because they are lies!
>> I signed it and I have a copy in my possession and I have right
>> in front of me at this very minute! It positively does NOT state what Yale
>> said it did! He lied and when people such as your pals keep repeating Yale's
>> lies they are liars as well. They are too coward to accept the "CHALLENGE"
>> which I have posted numerous times which I do now:
>
>But you just said that you've never offered money.
I haven't! Care to prove I have?
>Now, you're saying that you've offered it numerous times.
Where did I say "[I've] offered it numerous times"?
Lurkers: The above is a classic example of a patholoical liar!
They makeupies and offer no substantiate which they can't do
because it's a lie and then they want their target to prove
their lies are false and when you put them on the spoot they keep
skirting arround the issue!
>> --To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer
>> the $10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!
>>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=5oimrvs7agr9m92kj3q74a22vba99coeos%404ax.com&rnum=1
>> Subject: The $10,000 Challenge to Ken McVay aka Re: Harold Covington &
>> Scott Bradbury: The Blubberbury Twins
>> Message-ID: <5oimrvs7agr9m92kj...@4ax.com>
>> References: <bpe9d...@enews3.newsguy.com>
>> Date: 19 Nov 2003 11:29:26 GMT
>> Original challenge was made: Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:23:17 GMT
>>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4q0pbtc3gk6oour5opkjkj1q00geehk9n3%404ax.com&rnum=1
>> Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Making False Claims About My Medical Records...
>> Message-ID: <4q0pbtc3gk6oour5o...@4ax.com>
>> "NEW CHALLENGE: I will offer $1000.00 to anyone who will step up and
>> substantiate what Yale F. Edeiken claimed in his post about my Hermann
>> Hospital discharge diagnosis numbered 50 04882 6 9356."
>>
>> >Specifically, think of the $10,000 you've publicly offered and over wires
>> >that cross state lines- Fraudulently, I'd have to say, since you refuse
>> >to prove you have it.
>>
>> First I am a private citizen and I am not dealing in a commercial for
>> profit venture and I made no OFFER!
>
>You *just* said that you did.
LIAR!!
>"To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer the
>$10,000.00 Challenge "
>
>Look familiar?
YES!! Why don't you put yourself on the spot and try to substantiate Yale's lie
he started and spread about what my medical record stated!?
You losers areb so pathetic that you have to makeup lies tosmear me and
fabricate evidence to use against me in civil lawsuits!
Care to count all of the perjury and fabrications in your hero's faied lawsuiit
against me?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
>> If you think you have a case bring it on and we will see whose ass gets burned
>> when the judge sees my CHALLENGE,
>
>Which offers $10,000. Do you have the money or not? It's a simple
>question.
BEEN ANSWERED NUMEROUS YOU STUPID ONE:
--Patrick Keenan, Liar, Libeler, and Smear Agent's M.O.~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=d9ne10hmhv2q59acl...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: Slander of Patrick L Humphrey resumes
Message-ID: <d9ne10hmhv2q59acl...@4ax.com>
Date: 28 Jan 2004 06:54:21 GMT
<<Patrick Keenan has yet to substantiate his libel and has yet to substantiate
lies he has aided in spreading.>>
>> the smear made against me, and the unethical acts of an officer of the court
>> (Yale F.Edeiken) who started it all!
>>
>> >Unless you can prove that you have the money, you may
>> >well qualify for a federal "wire fraud" investigation,
>>
>> BRING IT ON!!! They will probably charge you with filing false reports
>
>And what reports will those be?
They would be the ones filong themm so file your complaint and see what happens
you numbskull!
>> when the whole truth comes out!
>
>Do you have the $10,000 for your "challenge", or not?
BEEN ANSWERED!!
>> >possibly sped up by your links to Al-Queda supporters.
>>
>>What links? What support to Al-Queda? You are a liar and smear is all you
>>have! Care to show any USENET post or web document where I have ever declared MY
>>support to Al-Queda? You are just like the Children of the Devil YOU
>>support!!
>
>You've sought help and "best wishes" from Mr. Michael, who you know has
>supported Al-Queda,
How is it I sought help from David Michael and how is it I sought as you put it-
"best wishes"?
>and who you know has applauded the murder of Americans.
>Don't you remember?
I do rememebr but evidently you forgot I made numerous strong denunciations
against his statements too!
My proof:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=Nnxp7.8929%24Aa7.824001%40news20.bellglobal.com&rnum=3&filter=0
(Archived locally as: PatrickKcaught)
From: "Patrick Keenan" <pkee...@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Message-ID: <Nnxp7.8929$Aa7.8...@news20.bellglobal.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:24:24 -0400
"Doc Tavish" <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
news:oh5dqtc7ooi48tt5n...@4ax.com...
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:21:36 -0400,
> <jg_brown-9F2130...@news.alt.net> "Jeffrey G. Brown"
> <jg_b...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <b7fe1abc.0109...@posting.google.com>,
> >david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote:
> >
> >> Gentlemen, it appears that the civilian death toll in this incident
> >> will be around 5,000. Nobody has a precise figure about how many
> >> civilians were killed in the American bombing of Hiroshima and
> >> Nagasaki -- I've seen estimates around the 270,000 mark.
>
> Japan started it with a sneak attack. Japan was also waging genocide against
> mainland China and brutally treating American POWs...
[...]
> >> -- so don't you *dare* criticize me for expressing heartfelt joy when
> >> someone finally turns around and gives the Establishment the bloody
> >> nose it so richly deserves.
Mass murder is not a 'bloody nose'. It is mass murder.
-pk
> You truly deserve the name of Lord Haw Haw you detestable vermin.
> BTW drop dead!
>
> >No one who has pointed out Michael's moral inversion in "expressing heartfelt
> >joy" at the deaths of more than 5000 people has *ever* "praised" the bombing of
> >Hiroshima or Nagasaki.
>
> History is being made today- I agree with you Jeffrey G. Brown.
>
> Doc Tavish
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
The above was your own post Patrick! Anyone can see how pissed off I was and
even more so seeing me actually agreeing with Jeffrey G.Brown whom I detest as
much as I detest you!!! Hardly looks like I supported 9-11 does it!?
>> >That could easily win you a new place to live, board included.
>>
>> Filing false complaints will get you free room and board and engaging in
>> actionable libel is also not all too wise either you liar and libeler!
>
>I've only been using your words, Mr. Bradbury. That's hardly libel.
My own words? You mean you have posted what you think I have said!
>Now speaking of falsehoods, can you prove that you have the $10,000 to back
>up your challenge?
BEEN ANSWERED NUMEROUS TIMES!!
--Patrick Keenan, Liar, Libeler, and Smear Agent's M.O.~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=d9ne10hmhv2q59acl...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: Slander of Patrick L Humphrey resumes
Message-ID: <d9ne10hmhv2q59acl...@4ax.com>
Date: 28 Jan 2004 06:54:21 GMT
<<Patrick Keenan has yet to substantiate his libel and has yet to substantiate
lies he has aided in spreading.>>
>> >Oh, and if you've made such "challenges" before.. the charges stack.
>>
>> The CHALLENGE is the burden of proof for the liars to substantiate Yale's
>> lie and when they can't then each one of them is to give me a $1000.00!
>
>So that's your plan - to get $1000 from each of several people without being
>able to back up your own position.
I can back up my claim that my medical record did not state what Yale falsely
claimed and oit is you and your fellowfilth who can't back up Yale'sie!
THAT IS THE REAL ISSUE!!
>> PLAIN AND SIMPLE- EVEN A HARD HEAD LIKE YOU SHOULD GET THE POINT BY NOW!!
>
>You know, you've just set up another of the conditions for wire fraud.
Report me then you stupid jerk! I insist and don't be a coward and make a report
anonymously either!
>Now, do you have the money to back up your "challenge" or not?
You are just like a needle stuck in a groove on a skipping record.
Here I illustrate how I am your opposite- I do make an accusation and I do prove
it!
--Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He Denies
Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund?--
NEWER UPDATED VERSION:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=f7murv0qqpmcfa2ldce7epo9gtg5am23rl%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: UPDATED The Nizkor Project Director is Lying About Funds He Has NOT
Reported to CCRA!! SAAF Report for 2002 Is Further Proof! R_1122
Message-ID: <f7murv0qqpmcfa2ld...@4ax.com>
Date: 22 Nov 2003 13:01:32 GMT
AKA "Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He
Denies Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"
COMICAL DENIAL OF DOCUMENTED FACTS:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=nlol001kbp1kh698t...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: Ken McVay's (Director of The Nizkor Project) $50,000+ Tax Evasion
Exposed aka Re: Gosh Darn Uppity Juice!
Message-ID: <nlol001kbp1kh698t...@4ax.com>
Date: 18 Jan 2004 21:17:40 GMT
OLDER ORIGINAL VERSION:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=07qc8vguuom77pvmugliksb3dmdf8pp82r%404ax.com&rnum=6
Subject: Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He
Denies Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund
Message-ID: <07qc8vguuom77pvmu...@4ax.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:22 GMT
Tavish
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:24:26 -0500,
><JsJRb.4879$qU3.3...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
>wrote:
>>"Barney Fife" <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote in message
>>news:d9ne10hmhv2q59acl...@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:56:14 -0500,
>>> <OKwRb.4564$qU3.2...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan"
>><te...@dev.null>
>>> wrote:
>>> >"Barney Fife" <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote in message
>>> >news:coqc10thonvmdmdda...@4ax.com...
>>> >> You certainly seem to know a lot about where I live and about my
>>> >> residence and you know what that is a sign of don't you?
>>> >Yeah, making notes of the guy who has been harassing them.
>>> How have I been harassing them?
>>Do pay attention.
>That is not an answer. How have I been harassing them? You made the accusaytion
>you lying son of a bitch so offer examples and realm proof! You are good at
>making accusations and dodging issues.
Like the issue of my $10k? Have you got it or not?
>>> >And remember, you invited them to your town.
>>> A LIE!! Show any document where I ever invited Patrick Humphrey to come to
>>> my town or for that fact show where I "invited" Sara Salzman to come to my
>>> town and NO- this was not an "invitation" in the least bit:
>>Sure looks like one to me.
>I hardly think enouraging liars and perjurers to ahve the failed lawsuit against
>me re-filed is an invitation and note they haven't done and for a fact the lying
>bastard who lost his apeal because of his DISMISSED lawsuit against me hasn't
>been posting in USENET since!
Of course, blubberbury can't understand that one cannot re-file a
lawsuit that one didn't file to begin with...
>I wonder why? As thois archive more than
>adequatelu proves I was very willing for the whole lawsuit to go back to court
>and proceed to square one! care to deny I posted this way back then?
Why would you want a lawsuit you claim to have one go back to court?
>IOW I am not the coward. I am not the one who high tailed and has to use proxies
>to speak through such as Yaleis obviously doing now! Tell him I really wish hje
>would re-file his perjurious lawsuit in my county at my courthouse and we will
>go through it one accusation right after another in front of a judge and a jury
>of my peers.
>
>Care to deny the following is filled with perjury and fabricated evidence?
Yep.
<snip fatboy citing zirself in support of zir delusions>
>>> I made no invitation and I did NOT mention Patrick at all!
>>And it's the USA, so he can't possibly go to your town.
>See how deceitful you are! Did I say he can't come to my town!? NO!
>Have I invited him to come tomy town? NO!!! Have I invited him to stalk me,
>intrude ikn my life and to take pictures of my residence? NO!!!
Has he done so? NO!!!
>R3emember Patrick Keenan- a lot of people may be reading this post today,
>tomorrow and in the future as an archived posts and I know some of my posts are
>now being feartured at someweb sites as examples of how people like you and
>yours operate.
Not that you can actually give an URL to any such site, but it looks
good as long as you forget your penchant for lying...
>If you all can'tbe honest in these trivial and obvious matters
>then why should YOUR words be taken seriously as reagrds to historical events
>such as WW II and the "Holocaust"?
Patrick's words about the Holocaust don't need to be taken seriously.
Only those of the generations of historians who have documented the
facts of the matter.
>I don't believe one damned things ypour pals
>post regarding Nazi atrocities! WHY? I know how they make up lies to prove their
>point or to further their agenda! Here is one of your fellow nitwits exposing
>himself for what he is:
<snip irrelevant personal attack of the type fatboy never uses>
>>> >They said they were coming; You left town.
>>> I was out of town before they showed up unannounced!
>>I seem to recall postings announcing their imminent arrival.
>Seem to recall?
Yes -- I *do* recall.
>It doesn't matter!
It does to your lie that their visit was unannounced. "If you can't
be honest in these trivial and obvious matters then why should YOUR
words be taken seriously?"
>My presence wasn't required for the lawsuit
>to be re-filed BUT I would be very glad to make my appearence in court should
>they be bold enough to do so!
They can't refile what they didn't file to begin with, blubberbury.
>>>For the lawsuit to be refiled-
>>Why would it be re-filed if you had "won"?
>It was DISMISSED in my favor and most people claim that is winning but liars and
>losers lik,e you claim it was dismissd on a technicality and that I didn't
>win--sonow I say- wekk then get Yale to re-file and we will all see who wins for
>sure hands down!
No, most people don't claim that. Only you, fatboy.
>>> which was the ONLY reason I gave for Yale and Sara Salzamn to come to
>>> my town did not require my physical presence to do such BUT I would be
>>> more than happy to appear in court should they wish to have it re-filed!!!
>>So how would you know in advance what they were there for?
>I didn't know in advance you fool! They blabbed later and I then stated the ONLY
>purpose was for the lawuist to be re-filed not to hear a fat pig bitch rant and
>rave!
So *after* the visit you did this...
>>> >They drove by your house.
>>> STALKING and they took pictures too!
>>Need a tissue?
>Funny you try to be jovial about stalking BUT I bet if I were to do the same to
>Sara you all would be screaming bloody murder!
One bet at a time, blubberbury -- you got the $10k or not?
>>> >Man, what a crime. Have you contacted your DA? His office is in the
>>> >courthouse, if you didn't know.
>>> I know where it is. I have been there and I personally know the DA.
>>Do you, now.
>I have known for years!
Then why were you complaining about them being at the DA's office when
your invitation was to the courthouse?
>BTW here is some more of your pals' damage control slam dunked:
<snip fatboy's rants, being cited in support of fatboy's rants>
>>> >Perhaps while you visit him you can ask him about what Wire Fraud is.
>>> Why am I concerned about wire fraud?
>>Ask him.
>I have no reason to ask him.
Other than it would appear you have engaged in it.
Unless you actually *have* the $10k?
>>> >Now, about that $10,000 you've been publicly offering..
>>> I made no public offering you repetitious liar and I have already
>>> explained it to you numerous times! Anyone clicking this link will see so:
>>Yes, they'll see you offering $10,000 - as you do again, in this very post.
>I made no OFFER.The term OFFER iis your term and I have already addressed the
>isssue numerous times you hard head!
Actually the word "offer" is the 13th word in your challenge: "To
those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer..."
See? This is why I want the money escrowed before I "slam dunk" you
-- you cannot even remember what you've been cut and pasting for
years, and I don't want you to "forget" to pay me when I post my
proof.
>Every time you act like a pinhead I will just post the above stock answer which
>expalins it all! You liars make accusations and don't prove them and then you
>demand the victim of your lies to prove they are false! I say- DROP DEAD!
You mean like your accusations of perjury and tax evasion?
<snip>
>>> >Specifically, think of the $10,000 you've publicly offered
>>> I NEVER publicly "OFFERED" money period.
>>Though you do exactly that a few lines down...
>LIAR!!
Nope. "To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I
offer..."
^^^^^
>>Can you prove that you have it?
>>> I also never engaged in gambling either though I did use the terminology of "safe bet" which isn't gambling
>>> because unlike "luck", "blind chance", "Lady Luck" or whatever- I know what my
>>> medical record states!
>>That's nice. You also know that you've been offering $10,000. Can you
>>prove you have it, or is your offer fraudulent?
>I made no OFFER!! can you prove the lies you and your pals are sopreading are
>true? Answer: NO you can't because they are lies!
I am spreading no lies. You are morbidly obese, and I will prove it
as soon as you post proof that your are not going to renege on the
$10k.
>>> I signed it and I have a copy in my possession and I have right
>>> in front of me at this very minute! It positively does NOT state what Yale
>>> said it did! He lied and when people such as your pals keep repeating Yale's
>>> lies they are liars as well. They are too coward to accept the "CHALLENGE"
>>> which I have posted numerous times which I do now:
>>But you just said that you've never offered money.
>I haven't! Care to prove I have?
LOL.
>>Now, you're saying that you've offered it numerous times.
>Where did I say "[I've] offered it numerous times"?
>
>Lurkers: The above is a classic example of a patholoical liar!
Well, at least fatboy is now admitting he lied.
>They makeupies and offer no substantiate which they can't do
>because it's a lie and then they want their target to prove
>their lies are false and when you put them on the spoot they keep
>skirting arround the issue!
>>> --To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer
There it is again!
>>> the $10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!
>>> >Specifically, think of the $10,000 you've publicly offered and over wires
>>> >that cross state lines- Fraudulently, I'd have to say, since you refuse
>>> >to prove you have it.
>>> First I am a private citizen and I am not dealing in a commercial for
>>> profit venture and I made no OFFER!
>>You *just* said that you did.
>LIAR!!
>>"To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer the
>>$10,000.00 Challenge "
>>
>>Look familiar?
>YES!! Why don't you put yourself on the spot and try to substantiate Yale's lie
>he started and spread about what my medical record stated!?
I will, as soon as I am assured that you have the $10k you have
offered in exchange for that proof.
>You losers areb so pathetic that you have to makeup lies tosmear me and
>fabricate evidence to use against me in civil lawsuits!
>
>Care to count all of the perjury and fabrications in your hero's faied lawsuiit
>against me?
Sure. Lemme see ... umm ... multiply by ... carry the five ... don't
forget the decimal ... okay.
That figure would be exactly:
Zero.
<snip the Shame of Belleville repeated baseless accusations that
have been dealt with before...>
>>> If you think you have a case bring it on and we will see whose ass gets burned
>>> when the judge sees my CHALLENGE,
>>Which offers $10,000. Do you have the money or not? It's a simple
>>question.
>BEEN ANSWERED NUMEROUS YOU STUPID ONE:
Nope. A "yes" or a "no" will do.
>>> >Unless you can prove that you have the money, you may
>>> >well qualify for a federal "wire fraud" investigation,
>>> BRING IT ON!!! They will probably charge you with filing false reports
>>And what reports will those be?
>They would be the ones filong themm so file your complaint and see what happens
>you numbskull!
Care to try that in English?
>>> when the whole truth comes out!
>>Do you have the $10,000 for your "challenge", or not?
>BEEN ANSWERED!!
Nope. A "yes" or a "no" will do.
>>> >possibly sped up by your links to Al-Queda supporters.
>>>What links? What support to Al-Queda? You are a liar and smear is all you
>>>have! Care to show any USENET post or web document where I have ever declared MY
>>>support to Al-Queda? You are just like the Children of the Devil YOU
>>>support!!
>>You've sought help and "best wishes" from Mr. Michael, who you know has
>>supported Al-Queda,
>How is it I sought help from David Michael and how is it I sought as you put it-
>"best wishes"?
The subject: "Ping David Michael- Do I have your permission and best
wishes to..."
<quote>
May I submit your e-mail address as being a witness and a recipient of
Yale's malicious prosecutions as well?
</quote>
See? "Best Wishes" and a request for help.
This is why I want the $10k escrowed -- you cannot even remember what
you yourself wrote less than two weeks ago. How do I know you won't
"forget" to pay me after I prove your obesity?
There's no denunciation at all there, let alone a strong one.
>The above was your own post Patrick! Anyone can see how pissed off I was and
>even more so seeing me actually agreeing with Jeffrey G.Brown whom I detest as
>much as I detest you!!! Hardly looks like I supported 9-11 does it!?
No one claimed you did, only that you are seeking best wishes and
assistance from one who did.
>>> >That could easily win you a new place to live, board included.
>>> Filing false complaints will get you free room and board and engaging in
>>> actionable libel is also not all too wise either you liar and libeler!
>>I've only been using your words, Mr. Bradbury. That's hardly libel.
>My own words? You mean you have posted what you think I have said!
No, he means your words.
>>Now speaking of falsehoods, can you prove that you have the $10,000 to back
>>up your challenge?
>BEEN ANSWERED NUMEROUS TIMES!!
Nope. A "yes" or a "no' will suffice.
>>> >Oh, and if you've made such "challenges" before.. the charges stack.
>>> The CHALLENGE is the burden of proof for the liars to substantiate Yale's
>>> lie and when they can't then each one of them is to give me a $1000.00!
>>So that's your plan - to get $1000 from each of several people without being
>>able to back up your own position.
>I can back up my claim that my medical record did not state what Yale falsely
>claimed and oit is you and your fellowfilth who can't back up Yale'sie!
>
>THAT IS THE REAL ISSUE!!
No, the issue is that your challenge has been accepted, but that you
cannot be trusted not to renege, and so the money your have offered
will need to be placed in escrow with appropriate instructions for its
disbursement.
>>> PLAIN AND SIMPLE- EVEN A HARD HEAD LIKE YOU SHOULD GET THE POINT BY NOW!!
>>You know, you've just set up another of the conditions for wire fraud.
>Report me then you stupid jerk! I insist and don't be a coward and make a report
>anonymously either!
You mean like your threat to sue me?
>>Now, do you have the money to back up your "challenge" or not?
>You are just like a needle stuck in a groove on a skipping record.
>
>Here I illustrate how I am your opposite- I do make an accusation and I do prove
>it!
Not in what I have snipped, which has been addressed here, and by the
CCRA and the IRS as well.
Do you have my $10k or not?
Patrick Keenan
Yes, it does matter. Your "challenge" is not honest - indeed, it is
fraudulent - if you do not have the cash.
Now, do you have the cash and can you prove that you have the cash, or not?
The answer is a simple yes or no.
<snip>
Patrick Keenan
OK, you've regularly posted telephone numbers and addresses, purported to be
theirs.
> >> >And remember, you invited them to your town.
> >>
> >> A LIE!! Show any document where I ever invited Patrick Humphrey to come
to
> >> my town or for that fact show where I "invited" Sara Salzman to come
to my
> >> town and NO- this was not an "invitation" in the least bit:
> >
> >Sure looks like one to me.
>
> I hardly think enouraging liars and perjurers to ahve the failed lawsuit
against
> me re-filed is an invitation and note they haven't done and for a fact the
lying
> bastard who lost his apeal because of his DISMISSED lawsuit against me
hasn't
> been posting in USENET since!
Actually, it was some time after that.
> I wonder why?
Better things to do, perhaps, than file suit against a judgement-proof
indigent?
As thois archive more than
> adequatelu proves I was very willing for the whole lawsuit to go back to
court
> and proceed to square one! care to deny I posted this way back then?
<Snip>
>
> I AM NOT AFRAID TO HAVE THE ABOVE GO BEFORE A JUDGE AGAIN- WHY IS YALE
AFRAID?
> WHY DID HE GO INTO HIDING?
Who says he's in hiding? And if you "won", how can the suit be re-filed?
Finally, didn't *your* attorney say that you were "semi-indigent" - that you
don't have funds to be sued for. Incidentally, that would also mean that
you don't have money to be making $10,000 challenges with, either.
<snip>
Says the guy who makes and offer of $10,000 and then immediately denies he's
done so..
No, it was dismissed "without prejudice". That means it's not in
*anyone's* favour.
> and most people claim that is winning
Only people who don't understand the term "without prejudice".
> ut liars and
> losers lik,e you claim it was dismissd on a technicality
Specifically, jurisdiction.
>a nd that I didn't win
which of course you did not, since the dismissal was "without prejudice".
>--sonow I say- wekk then get Yale to re-file and we will all see who wins
for
The first time.
> sure hands down!
>
> >> which was the ONLY reason I gave for Yale and Sara Salzamn to come to
> >> my town did not require my physical presence to do such BUT I would be
> >> more than happy to appear in court should they wish to have it
re-filed!!!
> >
> >So how would you know in advance what they were there for?
>
> I didn't know in advance you fool!
I seem to recall your responding to more than one of those posts, as well.
> They blabbed later and I then stated the ONLY
> purpose was for the lawuist to be re-filed not to hear a fat pig bitch
rant and
> rave!
So you admit that you changed the conditions after the fact? How
thoughtful of you.
>
> >> >They drove by your house.
> >>
> >> STALKING and they took pictures too!
> >
> >Need a tissue?
>
> Funny you try to be jovial about stalking BUT I bet if I were to do the
same to
> Sara you all would be screaming bloody murder!
Stalking is a serious criminal offense. If you are being stalked, I would
strongly suggest that you contact your local law enforcement professionals.
If you are being stalked, however, I would expect that it is by neither of
the individuals you have named.
>
> >> >Man, what a crime. Have you contacted your DA? His office is in the
> >> >courthouse, if you didn't know.
> >>
> >> I know where it is. I have been there and I personally know the DA.
> >
> >Do you, now.
>
> I have known for years!
Then he'll certainly have time to explain these laws to you.
>
<snip>
>
> >> >Perhaps while you visit him you can ask him about what Wire Fraud is.
> >>
> >> Why am I concerned about wire fraud?
> >
> >Ask him.
>
> I have no reason to ask him.
If you don't think so, then ask him why I would be interested to know
whether or not you have the $10,000 you mention in your "challenge", which I
read over the wires.
> >> >Now, about that $10,000 you've been publicly offering..
> >>
> >> I made no public offering you repetitious liar and I have already
> >> explained it to you numerous times! Anyone clicking this link will see
so:
> >
> >Yes, they'll see you offering $10,000 - as you do again, in this very
post.
>
> I made no OFFER.
"NEW CHALLENGE: I will offer $1000.00 to anyone "
> The term OFFER iis your term and I have already addressed the
> isssue numerous times you hard head!
If it's not your term, then why do I find it in each of the instances of you
re-post this:
"NEW CHALLENGE: I will offer $1000.00 to anyone "
As you do repeatedly in this very post?
Been done repeatedly, and in this post. Ah, but you don't even remember
what *you* write in a post.
> Every time you act like a pinhead I will just post the above stock answer
which
> expalins it all! You liars make accusations and don't prove them
Except that they have been... .
> and then you
> demand the victim of your lies to prove they are false!
No, I'm asking you to prove that you have the $10,000 that you are offering
in your "challenge".
> I say- DROP DEAD!
I say, prove that you have the money you have offered.
>
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0hqc101
ip0hnj506oni5...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
> >> Subject: Re: Thus spoke Scott Bradbury
> >> Message-ID: <0hqc101ip0hnj506o...@4ax.com>
> >> Date: 27 Jan 2004 13:37:24 GMT
> >>
> >> >do you have it, or not?
> >>
> >> Already been explained numerous times you ignoramus and here is a hint
> >> from the above archive:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:55:13 -0500,
> >> <4Z1Rb.21208$Kg6.1...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan"
> >> <te...@dev.null> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Specifically, think of the $10,000 you've publicly offered
> >>
> >> I NEVER publicly "OFFERED" money period.
> >
> >Though you do exactly that a few lines down...
>
> LIAR!!
You have some serious comprehension problems.
"> >> --To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer
> >> the $10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!"
Got the money to back this up?
>
> >Can you prove that you have it?
> >
> >> I also never engaged in gambling either though I did use the
terminology of "safe bet" which isn't gambling
> >> because unlike "luck", "blind chance", "Lady Luck" or whatever- I know
what my
> >> medical record states!
> >
> >That's nice. You also know that you've been offering $10,000. Can you
> >prove you have it, or is your offer fraudulent?
>
> I made no OFFER!!
"> >> --To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer
> >> the $10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!"
Got the money to back this up?
>can you prove the lies you and your pals are sopreading are
> true? Answer: NO you can't because they are lies!
"> >> --To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer
> >> the $10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!"
Got the money to back this up?
>
> >> I signed it and I have a copy in my possession and I have right
> >> in front of me at this very minute! It positively does NOT state what
Yale
> >> said it did! He lied and when people such as your pals keep repeating
Yale's
> >> lies they are liars as well. They are too coward to accept the
"CHALLENGE"
> >> which I have posted numerous times which I do now:
> >
> >But you just said that you've never offered money.
>
> I haven't! Care to prove I have?
"> >> --To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer
> >> the $10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!"
>
> >Now, you're saying that you've offered it numerous times.
>
> Where did I say "[I've] offered it numerous times"?
Counting blank lines, I suggest you look up twelve lines.
"They are too coward to accept the "CHALLENGE" which I have posted numerous
times which I do now:"
> Lurkers: The above is a classic example of a patholoical liar!
Says the guy who uses this in a post:
"> >> --To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer
> >> the $10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!"
And then immediately denies doing so...
> They makeupies and offer no substantiate which they can't do
> because it's a lie and then they want their target to prove
> their lies are false and when you put them on the spoot they keep
> skirting arround the issue!
>
> >> --To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer
> >> the $10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!
Hey, isn't that that pesky offer again?
> >>
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=5oimrvs7agr9m92kj3q74a22vba99coeos%
404ax.com&rnum=1
> >> Subject: The $10,000 Challenge to Ken McVay aka Re: Harold Covington &
> >> Scott Bradbury: The Blubberbury Twins
> >> Message-ID: <5oimrvs7agr9m92kj...@4ax.com>
> >> References: <bpe9d...@enews3.newsguy.com>
> >> Date: 19 Nov 2003 11:29:26 GMT
> >> Original challenge was made: Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:23:17 GMT
> >>
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4q0pbtc3gk6oour5opkjkj1q00geehk9n3%
404ax.com&rnum=1
> >> Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Making False Claims About My Medical
Records...
> >> Message-ID: <4q0pbtc3gk6oour5o...@4ax.com>
> >> "NEW CHALLENGE: I will offer $1000.00 to anyone who will step up and
> >> substantiate what Yale F. Edeiken claimed in his post about my Hermann
> >> Hospital discharge diagnosis numbered 50 04882 6 9356."
> >>
> >> >Specifically, think of the $10,000 you've publicly offered and over
wires
> >> >that cross state lines- Fraudulently, I'd have to say, since you
refuse
> >> >to prove you have it.
> >>
> >> First I am a private citizen and I am not dealing in a commercial for
> >> profit venture and I made no OFFER!
> >
> >You *just* said that you did.
>
> LIAR!!
" --To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer the
$10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!"
Sure looks like an offer to me. Looks enough like an offer, in fact, that
it's been accepted, contingent on your show of good faith. Prove that you
have the money.
>
> >"To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer the
> >$10,000.00 Challenge "
> >
> >Look familiar?
>
> YES!!
Then you agree that you just made an offer of a $10,000 "challenge".
> Why don't you put yourself on the spot and try to substantiate Yale's lie
> he started and spread about what my medical record stated!?
Really not an issue at this point. The issue NOW is whether you have the
money you've offered or not.
> You losers areb so pathetic that you have to makeup lies tosmear me and
> fabricate evidence to use against me in civil lawsuits!
>
> Care to count all of the perjury and fabrications in your hero's faied
lawsuiit
> against me?
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
> Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1"
Is
> Filled With Lies and Perjury...
> Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
>
> >> If you think you have a case bring it on and we will see whose ass gets
burned
> >> when the judge sees my CHALLENGE,
> >
> >Which offers $10,000. Do you have the money or not? It's a simple
> >question.
>
> BEEN ANSWERED NUMEROUS YOU STUPID ONE:
No, you have yet to confirm or deny that you have the money.
This needs a simple yes or no answer.
>
> --Patrick Keenan, Liar, Libeler, and Smear Agent's M.O.~~
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=d9ne10hmhv2q59acl...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
> Subject: Re: Slander of Patrick L Humphrey resumes
> Message-ID: <d9ne10hmhv2q59acl...@4ax.com>
> Date: 28 Jan 2004 06:54:21 GMT
> <<Patrick Keenan has yet to substantiate his libel and has yet to
substantiate
> lies he has aided in spreading.>>
>
> >> the smear made against me, and the unethical acts of an officer of the
court
> >> (Yale F.Edeiken) who started it all!
> >>
> >> >Unless you can prove that you have the money, you may
> >> >well qualify for a federal "wire fraud" investigation,
> >>
> >> BRING IT ON!!! They will probably charge you with filing false reports
> >
> >And what reports will those be?
>
> They would be the ones filong themm so file your complaint and see what
happens
> you numbskull!
And those reports will be?
>
> >> when the whole truth comes out!
> >
> >Do you have the $10,000 for your "challenge", or not?
>
> BEEN ANSWERED!!
No, it hasn't been. This needs a yes or no response.
So far, you've only hinted that you do not have the money to back up your
offer.
> >> >possibly sped up by your links to Al-Queda supporters.
> >>
> >>What links? What support to Al-Queda? You are a liar and smear is all
you
> >>have! Care to show any USENET post or web document where I have ever
declared MY
> >>support to Al-Queda? You are just like the Children of the Devil YOU
> >>support!!
> >
> >You've sought help and "best wishes" from Mr. Michael, who you know has
> >supported Al-Queda,
>
> How is it I sought help from David Michael and how is it I sought as you
put it-
> "best wishes"?
Do you really not remember? Here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=obnf00t0cs1accl16sttnnr6tdr9h4nt3v%404ax.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
The subject: "Ping David Michael- Do I have your permission and best
wishes to..."
<quote>
May I submit your e-mail address as being a witness and a recipient of
Yale's malicious prosecutions as well?
</quote>
You ask Mr. Michael for help - you wish his participation in your "filing" -
and you specifically ask for his "best wishes"
>
> >and who you know has applauded the murder of Americans.
> >Don't you remember?
>
> I do rememebr but evidently you forgot I made numerous strong
denunciations
> against his statements too!
And yet, here you are asking for help and "best wishes" from a man who
openly expressed support for Al-Queda and who applauded the murder of
Americans.
This does not add weight to your "numerous strong denunciations".
That's nice. I didn't say you did, now did I? What were the actual
words I used?
You've sought help and "best wishes" from an Al-Queda supporter.
But if you can't remember what you've offered from one line to the next....
>
> >> >That could easily win you a new place to live, board included.
> >>
> >> Filing false complaints will get you free room and board and engaging
in
> >> actionable libel is also not all too wise either you liar and libeler!
> >
> >I've only been using your words, Mr. Bradbury. That's hardly libel.
>
> My own words? You mean you have posted what you think I have said!
>
> >Now speaking of falsehoods, can you prove that you have the $10,000 to
back
> >up your challenge?
>
> BEEN ANSWERED NUMEROUS TIMES!!
No, you have dodged it repeatedly.
This takes a yes or no answer, Mr. Bradbury. Do you have the money to back
up your "challenge" and offer of $10,000, or not?
>
> --Patrick Keenan, Liar, Libeler, and Smear Agent's M.O.~~
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=d9ne10hmhv2q59acl...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
> Subject: Re: Slander of Patrick L Humphrey resumes
> Message-ID: <d9ne10hmhv2q59acl...@4ax.com>
> Date: 28 Jan 2004 06:54:21 GMT
> <<Patrick Keenan has yet to substantiate his libel and has yet to
substantiate
> lies he has aided in spreading.>>
>
> >> >Oh, and if you've made such "challenges" before.. the charges stack.
> >>
> >> The CHALLENGE is the burden of proof for the liars to substantiate
Yale's
> >> lie and when they can't then each one of them is to give me a $1000.00!
And if they can, *you* pay $10,000.
Do you have the funds to make such an offer?
> >
> >So that's your plan - to get $1000 from each of several people without
being
> >able to back up your own position.
>
> I can back up my claim that my medical record did not state what Yale
falsely
> claimed and oit is you and your fellowfilth who can't back up Yale'sie!
But can you back up your offer of $10,000?
>
> THAT IS THE REAL ISSUE!!
At the moment, no, the real issue is whether your offer of $10,000 is real
or fraudulent.
Yes or no: do you have the money to back up your offer or not?
>
> >> PLAIN AND SIMPLE- EVEN A HARD HEAD LIKE YOU SHOULD GET THE POINT BY
NOW!!
> >
> >You know, you've just set up another of the conditions for wire fraud.
>
> Report me then you stupid jerk! I insist and don't be a coward and make a
report
> anonymously either!
I would not make such a report anonymously, only partly because such reports
carry less weight as I'm sure you've discovered.
However, you must have full opportunity to prove that your challenge is
*not* fraudulent. And it's very easy for you to do this: Answer yes or no
to the question of whether or not you have the money to back up your
"$10,000 challenge".
>
> >Now, do you have the money to back up your "challenge" or not?
>
> You are just like a needle stuck in a groove on a skipping record.
We can move on to the next question as soon as you stop evading this one.
Provide the yes or no answer to the simple question:
Do you have the money to back up your "$10,000 challenge" or not?
Just yes or no, please. Mr. Bradbury, not more of your evasions.
>
> Here I illustrate how I am your opposite- I do make an accusation and I do
prove
> it!
Your "proofs" have been tosssed by the people that matter. You're the only
one clinging to them. Neither the CCRA or the IRS believe you.
-pk
<snip crap>
Allan Matthews
> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Allan Matthews wrote
> in message <EOWdnU6W5si...@giganews.com>:
>
> >In article <05fb0d80abcffc20...@news.teranews.com>, Roger
> ><roger@ . > says...
>
> >> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> >> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> >> someone claiming to be Allan Matthews wrote
> >> in message <drGdnbOx5tv...@giganews.com>:
>
> >> >In article <8bd0815bfb8a3373...@news.teranews.com>, Roger
> >> ><roger@ . > says...
>
> >> >> As soon as you post proof that you have escrowed the money so I know
> >> >> you aren't going to welsh.
>
> >> >Your ethnic slur is noted. This Welshman is not amused.
>
> >> Sorry if you were offended, but:
> >> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=welsh
> >>
> >> That's welsh, not Welsh (says Roger, who has a number of the ones with
> >> the capital in his family tree...)
>
> >The lack of a capital W makes no difference.
>
> Except to make it not an ethnic reference in the form of a (proper)
> noun, but the use of a generally accepted verb.
Clearly you don't get it. The etimology of the word itself makes this
clear.
> >The English began using
> >'welsh' in this way due to their prejudice that all Welshmen were
> >thieves.
>
> That's one possible etymology for a term that we don't *know* the
> genesis of.
Keep grasping at straws.
> Another strong possibility is that its use evolved from "wealh,"
> meaning specifically non-Saxon (that is to say, stranger or foreigner)
> according to Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.
That is also the root of the word Welsh itself.
> Am I now xenophobic as well?
No, and I never said you were. Why are you trying to put words in my
mouth?
You, in your ignorance, made an ethnic slur and are now trying furiously
to gloss the fact over.
> >Were you to use this word this way in most of Wales you'd be putting
> >yourself in deep doo doo.
>
> Not that I recall noticing, but then I cannot specifically recall
> using the term while there.
Lucky for you.
> Bottom line, if the term is that offensive to you, I shan't use it
> again -- but your claim that it *must* be an ethnic slur is nothing
> more than your *own* prejudices in action.
ROTFL!!! What projection.
Fucking hypocrite.
allan
--
allan_m...@bigfoot.com
===========================================
"Cry, cry - if it makes you feel better
Set it all down in a Tear Stained Letter"
===========================================
http://www.allan.matthews.name
Allan Matthews
kml...@nospam.shaww.ca says...
But I'm from Chicago.
allan
--
allan_matthews[at]bigfoot[dot]com
=========================================
"Illinois Nazis. I hate Illinois Nazis."
=========================================
http://www.allan.matthews.name
Hank Kimball (County Agent)
Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Liar of Xxxxxxx
Seeing how people like to post where I live then I will post where
the people live who made such info public in the first place!
Sara Salzman
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
4015 S Killarney Way
Aurora, Colorado 80013
http://kevdb.infospace.com/_1_26U9TCS04PZEGED__home/wp/detail/kevdb?KCFG=us&OTMPL=/wp/results_detail.htm&FF=1&QFM=N&QN=Salzman&QF=&QC=Aurora&QS=co&actnav=org&TQA=4015+S+Killarney+Way&TQC=aurora&TQS=co&QP=&QST=&QHN=&wqp=&QZ=80013&QK=1&QO=us&QD=&DM=751&&QI=0&jnum=1&jindex=0
(Archived locally as: infospace_Ssalzman)>>Public Information<<
I am being harassed by having my confidential information being posted along
with death threats, forged child porn ads being posted which give out my address
etc., having phoney sex offender lists posted which give out my address, having
magazine and catalog subscriptions forged in my identity etc. FOR A FACT it was
Yale F. Edeiken and Yale F. Edeiken alone who subpoenaed my confidential info
from my ISP and made the subpoenaed info public-- now let him receive justice
under the Law of Moses:
Just as has been done to me and is still being done to me and solely because
of Yale F. Edeiken exclusively I will apply the LAW he claims to observe to him:
Leviticus 24:19-20 :: New International Version (NIV)
19 If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him:
20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has injured the
other, so he is to be injured.
Yale F. Edeiken
918 N Bayard St
Allentown PA 18104
Tel 610 435-9820
(Source: Court documents)
If Yale does not like getting back in kind what he has dished out in kind
under the Law of Moses then he should either:
1) Re-file his nut case lawsuit in the proper jurisdiction and get charged with
numerous criminal counts of perjury and legal system abuse
OR
2) Encourage his THUG allies to stop harassing me and invading my privacy!
The choice is his!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-1605042226560001%40ts005d08.den-co.concentric.net&rnum=1
From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: Re: Yale Now Admits To Distributing Subpoenaed Information to a Group
of People... Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <catamont-160...@ts005d08.den-co.concentric.net>
>On Wed, 17 May 2000 03:28:14 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
><iloU4.3589$v%5.26...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
>
>>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>>news:3921f38a....@news.flash.net...
:.
>>> You are forever archived here with your lies about your subpoena issued to
>>> get my unlisted telephone number and unlisted address and your lies about
>>> YOUR mailing list. All admissable in court--- your recent words too!
:.
>> None of which mean what you state they mean. Mailing something to a
>>group of people is NOT"a private mailing list."
:.
>So now I do have you on record admitting to: "Mailing something to a
>group of people..."
>
>Thanks for the final admission asswipe!
>
>The "something" you mailed to a group of people was confidential
>information obtained using a subpoena. What you have confessed to is
>illegal activity!
Wrong again, anti-Lawyer.It's not confidential, it's PUBLIC INFORMATION.
Check. Certified. or Jumpsuit.
The choice is yours.
Sara
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>On 28 Jan 2004 06:19:03 -0600, <szkr7xk...@fnord.io.com> Patrick Lee
>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>Liar of Bellville
>
> Seeing how people like to post where I live then I will post where
...you're hiding after your ISP tosses your fat ass for spamming?
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <tleu109h6q6d7ggi6...@4ax.com>,
"Hank Kimball (County Agent)" <hank_k...@GreenAcresRFD12.net>
wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2004 06:19:03 -0600, <szkr7xk...@fnord.io.com>
> Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >Liar of Xxxxxxx
>
> Seeing how people like to post where I live then I will post
> where
> the people live who made such info public in the first place!
Thus spoke Scott Bradbury:
"Personal attack is all your kind has."
Lies and smear is all you have which is a sure sign that YOU are the
one who is
the loser!
- --To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer the
$10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!
- -and-
It is your kind who are the laughoing staocks
"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
"My name is not Bradshit you hooked nosed kike"
"Now go fist yourself hook nose"
"Why don't you ever accept my challenge you dick licker?"
Why won't you accept my challenge you dick nibbler?
Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook
nose
Didn't you mean Her Fatness as in your lard assed wife?
He's not a 'groid- he's a hook nosed kike!
Why don't you accept my challenge you filthy hook nosed kike bastard?
you stupid Jewish bitch!
My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!
For the sake of speculation- say that this piece of hog fat was alive
when the nazis were allegedly making soap and candles from Jews--
what do you think the nazis would get from this sow and her fat
globules?
NOW GO FIOST YOURSELF YOU FILTHY WHORE!
Now go fist yourself or engage in some of that "safe torture" posted
about before you perverted lying filthy whore!
Is your obesity why you have to stoop to fisting yourself because a
normal male can't copulate with you- YOUR FATNESS? BTW you still
haven't told us which body orifice it is that you fist and judging by
the size of your hands you must have one big as*hole and/or pu*sy! Do
you switch fist and do both orifices at the same time? Tell us all
fister!
Now go fist yurself!
Eat shit you dirty kike bastard!
I will call a fat lying bitch like you anything I please anytime I
want!
Now go fist yourself you fat pathetic slob!
You're the one whining Miss Piggy! Now go fist your gaping crack!
Eat shit, choke on it, and die you SoB (Son of Belial)
Care to elaborate you perjurious fat pig slob fister?
BTW I am a male therefore I am not a queen but to a dick lick like
you-
Now go fist yourself you fat slob!
I am not a lard ass you peter eater BUT your wife certainly is!
Looks like you're having a major meltdown you fat pathetic slob!
Heed your own advice you cock succker!
Now go fist yourself you fat evil lying pig.
My name isn't blubberbury you filth!
You don't know what I did you fat disgusting lying piece of pig shit!
Now that I told you filth "what it be" you can waddle off to your
mire Sara and
fist yourself you dirty pig!!
Drop dead you lying kike!
My name is not fatboy you Child of the Devil!
Can't refute what I post so you insult me- how Pharisee like of you!
Been answered numerous times you stupid cock sucker!
My name is not fatboy you krema klinker!
Now go fist yourself you piece of filth!
Now go fist yourself and get Sara "The Fist" salzman to teach you
how!
DROP DEAD YOU DIRTY PIG!!
I don't have to prove anything you dick lick.
REPORT ME YOU FATHER SUCKER!! I ENGAGED IN NO FRUD
NOW DROP DEAD YOU LYING YID!
WHO ARE YOU TO JUDGE ME YOU ANTI-CHRIST?
YOU FILTH HAVE ONLT RECEIVED WHAT YOU HAVE DESERVED THROUGHOUT
HISTORY!! YOU GET NO SYMPATHY FROM ME!!!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQB/h8CdySwjCuT94EQIGrgCdFn7timIbe2L3dCAT0Ucxfo9Q9DQAoPhR
rtFqcOQ0M5i53ssyMegy0jiE
=9Cu3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----