Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why! aka Re: PING David Michael: You Should Really Read This!! aka Yale Edeiken Disciplined by The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of The State of Pennsylvania! NEVER FORGET!! V2.0 S_0201
Eb Dawson
<catamont-4BD634...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>FORGED headers, altered headers
I forged no headers you liar! You made those posts and there is no denying it!
Care to deny you made those posts I quoted?
BTW I will make this one concession to you now:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Fist Fucking
:
By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.
Says so right on the label.
We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.
Your mileage may, of course, vary.
Perrrfect
--
It never rains under my umbrella
~~End~~
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=hpa1uv0m63koaqbo4...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She Wrote
The FIST Postings! Date: 17 Dec 2003 19:40:10 GMT
Message-ID: <hpa1uv0m63koaqbo4...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=ige2uvsjk0bfi54at...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She
Wrote The FIST Postings! Date: 18 Dec 2003 06:13:32 GMT
Message-ID: <ige2uvsjk0bfi54at...@4ax.com>
Despite overwhelming evidence Sara "The Fist" will keep repeating
her lies and remain in denial.
Now do you want to address some real FORGERIES? For a fact you made those posts
detailed above and also for a FACT Yale F. Edeiken took other people's postings
and then signed them as Doc Tavish in his sworn statements he made against me in
a civil court.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
Excerpt:
>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
>
>IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
>
>CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
>
>YALE F. EDEIKEN :
> :
>Plaintiff :
> :
>vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
> :
>
>SCOTT BRADBURY
> 24. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>"You only want to blow Joe
>You want to suck Joe's Aryan cock, don't you Yale?
> Doc Tavish"
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-1."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=1201801624195636%40unribbed.net&rnum=1
(Archived locally as: A-1Not1 and A-1Not2)
From: earlt...@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Vapor, Fatelvis, Bull Conner & B9Predator. Prepare for the worst.
Date: 1999/01/08
Message-ID: <12018016...@unribbed.net>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915759892 24.65.203.77
(Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT)
Organization: @Home Network Canada
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT
Newsgroups: soc.culture.african.american,alt.flame.niggers
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: PIN JOE DOWN AND SUCK HIS COCK
> > Isn't strange that Yale has only two little harmless posts to offer
> >in his insane attempts to slander?
>
> If they are harmless why are your associates so upset. Indeed you
> admit that. If they were "harmless" they could not be "slander" (they
> aren't, of course).
>
> > REMEMBER: THEY ONLY SMEAR THE ONES THEY FEAR.
>
> But I neither fear you or smear you.
you only want to blow joe
you want to suck joes aryan cock dont you yale
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Not sent by me, not signed "Doc Tavish" and it's from a regular ISP too!
That is perjury submitting falsified evidence!
> 26 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"Are you homosexual, Yale?
>
>Your last lines look like a faggot speaking or are you merely trying to
>make trouble like a malicious fag does
>
> Doc Tavish"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-3."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=486bdd608ea62bee...@anonymous.poster&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: A-3Not1 and A-3Not2)
From: Secret Squirrel <an...@squirrel.owl.de>
Subject: Yale The FAG Burps
Date: 1998/12/06
Message-ID: <486bdd608ea62bee...@anonymous.poster>#1/1
References: <19981204233749...@ng96.aol.com> <36695...@news3.ente
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
<postm...@squirrel.owl.de>. The message sender's identity is unknown,
unlogged, and not replyable.
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Rabbi Bellinger Lectures the Jews on Judaism
> > THEY ONLY SMEAR THE ONES THEY FEAR.
>
> I neither smear you or fear you. I have very little to fear from a
> lying anti-Semite without even the nerve to defend his ideas before an >
impartial tribunal.
>
>
> "hello? antone out there 12-14 e-mail me. i am thirteen and . .
> .well if you e-mail me at jbel...@sprynet.com you can find out more
> about me i am a female."
>
> --YFE
are you homosexual yale
your last lines look like a faggot speaking or are you merely
trying to make trouble like a malicious fag does
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
An anonymous post and it was NOT signed Doc Tavish as Yale claimed in a
sworn statement. I wonder if he would deny he has perjured himself!
> 31 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
> "So why do you still want to suck his cock?
>Do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood?
>
> Doc Tavish"
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=0901801802535739%40hexer.org&output=gplain
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=0901801802535739%40hexer.org
(Archived locally as: A-7Not1 and A-7Not2)
From: Laz <hell...@home.com>
Subject: I'm targeted for what? damn.
Date: 1999/01/05
Message-ID: <09018018...@hexer.org>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915502345 24.2.101.226 (Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25
PDT)
Organization: @Home Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
> It is now 8 days since this lying nazi bragged that he would have my
> service with enter.net discontinued.
>
> My e-mail address is still ya...@enter.net,
>
> He is still a nazi.
>
> He is still a liar.
>
> He is still a punk.
>
>
> --YFE
so why do you still want to suck his cock
do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Yale got the author and date wrong too and the post was not signed
Doc Tavish as he claimed in his perjured statement. I also never had
an account at the regular ISP used either! CRIMINAL PERJURY!!!
> 33. That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"What are you doing, Yale trolling for young boys again ? We all know you
>have homosexual tendencies and you call all people homophobes who
>oppose"gay rights" We also know how you have slandered the most righteous
>Rev Fred Phelps in the past for his stands against the homosexual
>lifestyle.
>
>When are you militant homosexuals going to stop your perversions and seek
>to live a meaningful life with purpose? Why do you wish to portray
>yourself as a thirteen year old female -- what would your neighbors in
>Allentown Pennsylvania think of your current degradation -- have you no
>pride at all?"
>
>I guess all you want to do is suck some young boys cock -- typical
>homosexual sympathist from Nizkor you are -- why are Nizkorians so
>pro-homosexual -- is it because all of you or at least most of you are
>homosexual. If any group is comprised of liars it has to be your group
>because you all even stoop to trying to deceive nature -- now go play with
>your Barbie doll faggot child molester
>
> Doc Tavish:
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-10."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=19981206172003.29681.qmail%40nym.alias.net&output=gplain
(Archived locally as: A-10Not1 and A-10Not2)
From: lcs Mixmaster Remailer <m...@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Yale Edeiken a Trolling Chickenhawk?
Date: 1998/12/06
Message-ID: <1998120617200...@nym.alias.net>#1/1
References: <19981205163543...@ng115.aol.com> <3669b...@news3.ent
X-Comment1: This message did not originate from the
X-Comment2: above address. It was automatically remailed
X-Comment3: by an anonymous mail service. Please report
X-Comment4: problems or inappropriate use to
X-Comment5: <postm...@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Newsgroups: alt.politics.libertarian.gay
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Rabbi Bellinger Lectures the Jews on Judaism
> References: <19981205163543...@ng115.aol.com>
> X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.51
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.51
> Message-ID: <3669b...@news3.enter.net>
yale edeiken's obvious chickenhawk troll lines:
> "hello? antone out there 12-14 e-mail me. i am thirteen and . .
> .well if you e-mail me at ya...@enter.net you can find out more
> about me i am a female."
>
> --YFE
what are you doing yale trolling for young boys again -- we all know you
have homosexual tendencies and you call all people homophobes who oppose
"gay rights" -- we also know how you have slandered the most
righteous rev fred phelps in the past for his stands against
the homosexual lifestyle
when are you militant homosexuals going to stop your perversions and
seek to live a meaningful life with purpose -- why do you wish to portray
yourself as a thirteen year old female -- what would your neighbors in
allentown pennsylvania think of your current degradation -- have you no
pride at all
i guess all you want to do is suck some young boys cock -- typical
homosexual sympathist from nizkor you are -- why are nizkorians so
pro-homosexual -- is it because all of you or at least most of you
are homosexual
if any group is comprised of liars it has to be your group because you
all even stoop to trying to deceive nature -- now go play with your
barbie doll faggot child molestor
aryan-american
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Once again an anonymous post which Yale perjured himself by signing my nym
"Doc Tavish" in his complaint and attributed it to me in a sworn statement.
> 34 That on December 8, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>All Nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
>custody until a final solution can be made.
>
> Doc Tavish"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A11."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1B209C3CD.7C009BBF34A90591%40library-proxy.airnews.net&output=gplain
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1...@library-proxy.airnews.net&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: A-11Not1 and A-11Not2)
From: Pee Kitty <Pki...@mariner.cris.com>
Subject: Re: Furmanski is lame
Date: 1998/12/20
Message-ID:
<84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1...@library-proxy.airnews.net>#1/1
X-Orig-Message-ID: <20129820...@grinding.net>
NNTP-Posting-Time: Sun Dec 20 21:15:30 1998
Organization: Digital Highway (using Airnews.net!)
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library3
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at dhc.net to report improper postings
Newsgroups: alt.slack,alt.newsangels
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Nizkook Band
> References: <19981207212932...@ng-cb1.aol.com>
> X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> Message-ID: <366ca...@news3.enter.net>
> Date: 7 Dec 1998 22:57:39 +0500
all nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
custody until a final solution can be made
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Once again a post Yale admitted in a sworn statement signed "Doc Tavish"
when it is obvious another person posted it! PERJURY!!!!!
THE FOLLOWING IS THE CROWN OF MANUFACTURING EVIDENCE AND REMEMBER ALL OF THIS
FALSE TESTIMONY WAS SUBMITTED TO A CIVIL COURT AS SWORN STATEMENTS BY CRIMINAL
PERJURER NAMED YALE F. EDEIKEN OF ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA!!
The following false contrived accusation is the pinnacle of perjury or
manufacturing of evidence to be submitted as sworn testimony in a court of law
and this was done by a Plaintiff (who was his own attorney and who is an
attorney) against the Defendant; me. I will slam dunk this criminality in full
just below!
> 39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
>buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
>assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
>with an ice pick Yale!"
>
> --digsig
> Authentic Doc Tavish
>
> 191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
> qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
> 4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
Positive proof 100% that the Plaintiff willfully and most maliciously lied to a
civil court with the above accusation:
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com&output=gplain
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>
39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
<end>
Notice what was said in an anonymous post (shown just below) and the date of the
post and compare it to what Yale F. Edeiken charges just above! Remember Yale
claimed I e-mailed the above to him and he claimed I signed it and had my
digital signature and this was done in a sworn document admitted to a civil
court of law!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=199902171515.KAA08970%40domains.invweb.net
(Archived locally as: AnonIcePick1 and AnonIcePick2)
From: Anonymous (nob...@openpgp.net)
Subject: Re: Joe Bellinger, Proven Liar
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Date: 1999/02/17
> > >>It is thus established that:
> > >>
> > >> - Joe Bellinger stated that he does, in fact, "post deliberate
> > >>misinformation".
> > >> - Joe Bellinger denied having made said statement.
> > >> - Joe Bellinger is, therefore, a liar.
> > >>
> > >>To coin a phrase: GAME, SET, MATCH.
> > >Did anyone expect any different result?
> > LOL! For grown men, you are all so childish.
:
> Expecting some minimal level of honesty -- a low standard which
> you seem incapable of meeting -- is hardly "childish."
>
> It frightens me that, with attitudes like this, you are raising a
> child.
>
> In article <19990112213243...@ng31.aol.com>,
> deb...@aol.com
> (Debunks) wrote: "I post deliberate misinformation . . ."
>
> --YFE
You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!
~~End of GOOGLE aka DejaCom Archive~~
Notice the above was an anonymous post. It was not an e-mail and notice that it
had no digital signature signed by me! Also notice the big difference in dates
the above was posted February 17, 1999 yet Yale accuses me: "That on November
11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an electronic communication stating in
pertinent part (the above EXACT quoted text)"
Witness this:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=6&ic=1&selm=osjdbt41kq8ov7moqagjivihjnda67vadt%404ax.com
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:07:41 -0600
Message-ID: <osjdbt41kq8ov7moq...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=96fnp3%242bar%2...@news.tht.net&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: LibelousPerjury)
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,alt.conspiracy
Subject: "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 05:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <96fnp3$2bar$1...@news.tht.net>
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
<stop>
Crypto Kong does not insert blank lines in between "Authentic Doc Tavish"
and the crypto-text as confirmed by the software's author to both myself
and my attorney!
Here is the official reply to my inquiry:
X-Sender: jam...@shell11.ba.best.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:51:20 -0800
To: Scott Bradbury <xx...@flash.net>
From: "James A. Donald"
Subject: Re: Inquiry on Crypto-Kong Signatures
Cc: "Daylin B. Leach - Attorney at Law" <xxx...@aol.com>
--
At 0412 AM 2/23/2001 -0600, Scott Bradbury wrote
> The above forged digital signataure is verbatim and is exactly which was
> presented to the court.
To be presented to the court, it must be alleged to have signed
something. A digital signature without the text that it signed is of no
significance.
(Note: I did not include Yale's fabricated e-mail- I just sent Mr. Donald
the forged digital signature.)
> The digsig also has a blank line in between "Authentic Doc
> Tavish" and the bogus crypto-text. Your software does not do this in
> ANY example I've ever seen.
That is perfectly true. My program does not emit such blank lines, which
suggest fabrication, but not strong evidence of anything much, since the
blank line could have arisen from various accidents in transferring text
from one program to another.
> I do this for the benefit of my attorney. -)
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
GnwV4rmsIA8faEZwt0YOXUiSSJflZjiLd/kTrWIn
4F1jg73LTqhfLPw9BVz2uDGwa7v2WYBG0wNGHSkoM
<END>
--
As for Mr. Donald's statement: "the blank line could have arisen from
various accidents in transferring text from one program to another"-
the above fabricated signature from Edeiken's complaint is verbatim in the
group of false accusations known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE
DEEMED ADMITTED." Notice Mr. Donald's digsig? No spaces and blank lines!
Notice my digsig made on this paragraph alone?
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
ejnWmIh1JCyv0DNQedTMFE/cAfXBLuqdxSAkk9w/
4O0CysIswhm2G04W2mJFeW7C7K5RHQkNr3oFBzH6X
NO BLANK LINES AND SPACES!
What are the penalties for submitting manufactured evidence?
[...]
Here is Yale making his false accusation in public forum:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3920d160.112256232%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
(Archived locally as: YalesLies)
Subject: Yale's Anonymous Post Signed By Me?! What an Oaf! aka Re: Bradbury
Caught in a Psychotic Delusional Rage
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <3920d160....@news.flash.net>
On Tue, 16 May 2000 04:12:22 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<GU3U4.3347$v%5.24...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=GU3U4.3347%24v%255.2...@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: YaleLied1 and YaleLied2)
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920c22c....@news.flash.net...
[...]
>> > Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who write anonumus
>> >notes to others like:
>> >
>> > " You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your
>> >butt buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and
>> >character assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly
>> >work you over with an ice pick Yale!"
>> The above is just exactly what you said it is Yale, "anonumus" your word!
>> Just because you are a paranoid and have a psychotic dislike of me does
>> not mean every thing you imagine comes from me.
:
> It came from you
Then why didn't you show the headers which would show so Yale?
>and was signed by you.
Then why didn't you show my signature? If I signed it and it was from me
as you claim why do you call it "anonumus"? It would not be so if were
truly from me as headers would show and it actually had my signature!
What did you say in just another post about the "e-mail" above Yale? Your
own words again: "Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who
write anonumus notes to others like:" It's ANONYMOUS Yale! You've said so!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=Ms1U4.3324%24v%255.238968%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=1
Archived locally as: Nradbury1 and Nradbury2)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Nradbury Goes Off the Deep End
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <Ms1U4.3324$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
(Exact quote for the record)
" I think you need a good psychiatirc examination. Perhaps you should ask
your shrink about people who write anonumus notes to others like: " You
are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt buddy
Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!""
No headers and no signature.
I guess the above is fair proof that Yale likes to forge e-mail even if it
is in his word "anonumus."
>> Your failure to do the same is noted. And will be by the judge.
>> --YFE
~~End of GOOGLE Archive Excerpt (With updated GOOGLE links)~~
PERJURY!!
REMEMBER ALL OF THE ABOVE CRIMINAL FALSIFICATION CAME FROM A BASTARD WHO HAS
ALREADY BEEN PUBLICLY CENSURED BY THE HIGHEST COURT IN HIS STATE!!
I.E.
--Criminal Yale F. Edeiken's deplorable record:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
The Disciplinary Board was content to give Yale F. Edeiken a "private reprimand"
but he continued to act like the psychotic nut case he is and defied them and
refused to appear at his hearing more than once! He was then "forced" to appear
and the "private reprimand" had escalated to "PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest
court of that bastard's state! Furthermore the Disciplinary Board closed with:
"It is further ORDERED that respondent [Yale F. Edeiken] shall pay costs to the
Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), PaR.D.E." IOW Yale had to pay the
Disciplinary Board to "kick his shyster ass" AFTER the Disciplinary Board of the
Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania had to serve numerous notices upon
him and compel him to attend his disciplinary hearing!! Yale also had to pay for
all costs of the investigation too! It's all detailed in that PDF file!! GO
LOOK!!
BTW Yale F. Edeiken had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and
Yale had received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995! Then the bastard got "PUBLIC
CENSURE" in 1998!!! Looks like Yale F. Edeiken is real shining example of the
legal profession doesn't it? Why that shyster still has his law license is a
mystery to me!
Tavish
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Sara Salzman
Hash: SHA1
In article <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>,
Eb Dawson <eb_d...@GreenAcresRFD12.net> wrote:
Thus spoke Scott Bradbury:
"Personal attack is all your kind has."
Lies and smear is all you have which is a sure sign that YOU are the
one who is
the loser!
- -and-
"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
"My name is not Bradshit you hooked nosed kike"
"Now go fist yourself hook nose"
"Why don't you ever accept my challenge you dick licker?"
Why won't you accept my challenge you dick nibbler?
Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook
nose
Didn't you mean Her Fatness as in your lard assed wife?
He's not a 'groid- he's a hook nosed kike!
Why don't you accept my challenge you filthy hook nosed kike bastard?
you stupid Jewish bitch!
My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!
For the sake of speculation- say that this piece of hog fat was alive
when the nazis were allegedly making soap and candles from Jews--
what do you think the nazis would get from this sow and her fat
globules?
NOW GO FIOST YOURSELF YOU FILTHY WHORE!
Now go fist yourself or engage in some of that "safe torture" posted
about before you perverted lying filthy whore!
Is your obesity why you have to stoop to fisting yourself because a
normal male can't copulate with you- YOUR FATNESS? BTW you still
haven't told us which body orifice it is that you fist and judging by
the size of your hands you must have one big as*hole and/or pu*sy! Do
you switch fist and do both orifices at the same time? Tell us all
fister!
Now go fist yurself!
Eat shit you dirty kike bastard!
I will call a fat lying bitch like you anything I please anytime I
want!
Now go fist yourself you fat pathetic slob!
You're the one whining Miss Piggy! Now go fist your gaping crack!
Eat shit, choke on it, and die you SoB (Son of Belial)
Care to elaborate you perjurious fat pig slob fister?
BTW I am a male therefore I am not a queen but to a dick lick like
you-
Now go fist yourself you fat slob!
I am not a lard ass you peter eater BUT your wife certainly is!
Looks like you're having a major meltdown you fat pathetic slob!
Heed your own advice you cock succker!
Now go fist yourself you fat evil lying pig.
My name isn't blubberbury you filth!
You don't know what I did you fat disgusting lying piece of pig shit!
Now that I told you filth "what it be" you can waddle off to your
mire Sara and
fist yourself you dirty pig!!
Drop dead you lying kike!
My name is not fatboy you Child of the Devil!
Can't refute what I post so you insult me- how Pharisee like of you!
Been answered numerous times you stupid cock sucker!
My name is not fatboy you krema klinker!
Now go fist yourself you piece of filth!
Now go fist yourself and get Sara "The Fist" salzman to teach you
how!
DROP DEAD YOU DIRTY PIG!!
I don't have to prove anything you dick lick.
REPORT ME YOU FATHER SUCKER!! I ENGAGED IN NO FRUD
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQB1h9ydySwjCuT94EQLgkQCdGoYXhl6XW6Ux0SiqUKu35JywimwAnA5Z
b7NKCPZdi6n3xMEqh5i4eMmF
=5BJF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
Eb Dawson
<catamont-F17469...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>Subject: Scott Bradbury does not engage in personal attack.
I don't and the one sided out of context quotes you keep parroting aren't
proofs! You are dishonest when you refuse to also post what I responded to!
Even Jesus when he had enough verbal abuse form your evil forefathers would call
them serpents and vipers and he also told them they were the Children of the
Devil which you are Sara!
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=f2fe10t1v5jkcaq9g...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Jesus Christ & Deceased Christians- Their Condition According to TALMUD
(Boiling Semen & Excrement) S_0127
Message-ID: <f2fe10t1v5jkcaq9g...@4ax.com>
Date: 28 Jan 2004 05:36:04 GMT
Gord McFee
> I forged
INTRODUCTION
"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of my
posts prove so! You can't discern the difference."
EXAMPLES
"My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong you
dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!"
"You keep calling me "Fatboy" you stupid kike vermin. Why don't you put
your money where your big fat mouth is you Jew scum bastard?"
-- Message-ID: <grreuvc487rg2rg6f...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 22 Dec 2003 22:30:34 GMT
"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
-- Message-ID: <rpul00tk1ajl83bjl...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 18 Jan 2004 21:47:43 GMT
"Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook nose"
-- Message-ID: <02io001hb4aq4v5qv...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 19 Jan 2004 21:11:46 GMT
"BTW my name is not Blubberbury you pig fucker!"
-- Message-ID: <csmn109c84gsumkhr...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 31 Jan 2004 16:43:08 GMT
** All of the above from Scott Bradbury, who never calls people names and
is an expert in irony **
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Gord McFee
> On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 13:30:49 -0700,
> <catamont-F17469...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>>Subject: Scott Bradbury does not engage in personal attack.
>
> I don't
INTRODUCTION
"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of my
posts prove so! You can't discern the difference."
EXAMPLES
"My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong you
dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!"
"You keep calling me "Fatboy" you stupid kike vermin. Why don't you put
your money where your big fat mouth is you Jew scum bastard?"
-- Message-ID: <grreuvc487rg2rg6f...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 22 Dec 2003 22:30:34 GMT
"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
-- Message-ID: <rpul00tk1ajl83bjl...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 18 Jan 2004 21:47:43 GMT
"Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook nose"
-- Message-ID: <02io001hb4aq4v5qv...@4ax.com>
Eb Dawson
Gord McFee <gord....@rogers.com> wrote:
>On 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT, Eb Dawson wrote:
>
>> I forged nothing!!!!
>
>INTRODUCTION
>
>"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of my
>posts prove so! You can't discern the difference."
Very true!! My posts are replied to with continual verbal abuse and then I will
occasionally answer the filth in a manner they deserve BUT the bulk of my posts
are not name calling and personal attacks. I stand by what I state too!
Exposing lies and perjury are not personal attacks!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
Do you want to go on public record Gord and deny that Yale F.Edeiken submitted
falsified evidence to an civil court as the archive above proves?
Let it be noted- Gord McFee condones lies and submitting manufactured evidence
to a court of law. What does that do for his credibility when it comes to
historical events such as "The Holocaust"?
The examples below are also proofs how people such as Gord McFee only show one
side of a two way exchange, how people like Gord McFee will deliberately quote
out of context and how people like Gord McFee will never show who made the first
punch or who hurls the first insults! I am only human and I have my limits to
the abuse I am willing to take from Gord and his Gang!
>EXAMPLES
>
>"My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
>is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong you
>dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!"
>
>"You keep calling me "Fatboy" you stupid kike vermin. Why don't you put
>your money where your big fat mouth is you Jew scum bastard?"
>
>-- Message-ID: <grreuvc487rg2rg6f...@4ax.com>
>-- Date: 22 Dec 2003 22:30:34 GMT
>
>"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
>
>-- Message-ID: <rpul00tk1ajl83bjl...@4ax.com>
>-- Date: 18 Jan 2004 21:47:43 GMT
>
>"Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook nose"
>
>-- Message-ID: <02io001hb4aq4v5qv...@4ax.com>
>-- Date: 19 Jan 2004 21:11:46 GMT
>
>"BTW my name is not Blubberbury you pig fucker!"
>
>-- Message-ID: <csmn109c84gsumkhr...@4ax.com>
>-- Date: 31 Jan 2004 16:43:08 GMT
>
>** All of the above from Scott Bradbury, who never calls people names and
>is an expert in irony **
All quoted out of context and none shows what I was replying to! Why is that
Gord?
Here is my stock answer for your favorite spammed smear:
>-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
>is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
>you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
Notice I called Art Tandy a lying Jew Bastard (which he is) AFTER I had my fill
of his continual verbal abuse! I guess you expect me to not respond to such
abuse in the manner I did which is another reason why Jews are despised. Most
people hate double standards!
The above exchange was a result of this:
<start/quote>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ple4cv8432qih0sft30s5tqi7junbkc0c3%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: Re: Anti-Gun Organizations are Jewish ...
Message-ID: <ple4cv8432qih0sft...@4ax.com>
References: <abf0ff5d.03051...@posting.google.com>
On 13 May 2003 21:18:58 -0700, <abf0ff5d.03051...@posting.google.com>
tar...@indystart.com (knight57) wrote:
><deleted unreliable bullshit by the psychotic and chronic liar named
>Fatbury Scumbag>
My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call is all
a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong you dirty filthy
lying Jew bastard! <END>
------------------------
Rather than dealing in facts your Jew decided he would rather engage in
name calling and chose to ignore my proofs and it is all fully documented here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rtasbv05mohed914ktef95j9dh3kc11dmr%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Arthur J. Tandy in Denial About Who The Main Gun Grabbers Are!
Message-ID: <rtasbv05mohed914k...@4ax.com>
Date: 11 May 2003 11:35:17 GMT (Archived as: AJT1)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kf6dcv8pgph2v568bnlhda66md7d4q8bg0%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Arthur J. Tandy's Fellow Jews Are Trying to Extend Their Gun Control!
Message-ID: <kf6dcv8pgph2v568b...@4ax.com>
Date: 11 May 2003 11:35:17 GMT (Archived as: AJT2)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ple4cv8432qih0sft30s5tqi7junbkc0c3%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: Re: Anti-Gun Organizations are Jewish (Classic Repost from January 17,
1997) Message-ID: <ple4cv8432qih0sft...@4ax.com>
Date: 14 May 2003 13:23:47 GMT (Archived as: AJT3)
<end/quote>
>-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
>the bulk of my posts prove so!
Still TRUE and my original postings as a whole are not personal attacks!
The greater majority of Art Tandy's posts are name calling and personal
attacks which seems to be a very common method of reply by Jews and their
gentile USEFUL IDIOTS! Anyone reading the above three archives will see me
presenting many documented facts and in every case Art Tandy would reply
with: "I deny it, you ignorant fat piece of lying shit.. You are a fat lying
ignorant fuck.. Fatboy Turns Blind and runs Away from the Issue.. I am
telling the TRUTH, something you cannot do very well, fatscum.. That
doesn't prove all Jews support gun control, you fucking moron. Your
logic is ridiculous and you are a stupid degenerate lowlife... <deleted
unreliable bullshit by the psychotic and chronic liar named Fatbury Scumbag>"
>You can't discern the difference.
>BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
Who called names first? It is Okay for Jews to hurl abuse in post after post but
when the recipient gets tired of it and calls the bastard a KIKE then you think
it is ironic or hypocritical. If you Jews don't like being called kikes, swine,
vermin etc, then STOP calling everyone you can't refute names!
> --Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
No, there is no irony. I will call you obnoxious Jews what you are every time
I've had my abundant fill of your Chutzpa or name calling! If you don't want me
to call you and your fellow Christ Denying Pharisees KIKES or Lying Jew
Bastards/Bitches in reply to your kind's continual insults hurled at me then you
should stop with the name calling! Plain and simple!!
<END of stock reply>
I will never trust you, Nizkor, or any of you when it comes to any documents
related to WW II. If you people are so dishonest with such as the above then why
should your historical research be consider unbiased when it is obvious you
follow an agenda or as one of your fellows honestly stated:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=e3bmvvcsor28r7sn5kisjtvhi33q15s1co%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Michael Ragland's History of Dementia Documented (As Well as Some of
His Fellows) Message-ID: <e3bmvvcsor28r7sn5...@4ax.com>
Date: 6 Jan 2004 22:56:06 GMT
(Brief excerpt- Click link above for the rest of the story)
From: Micha...@webtv.net (Michael Ragland)
Subject: Re: I'M BORED WITH HEARING ABOUT FUCKING AUSTRIA
Date: 2000/02/08
Message-ID: <8537-38A...@storefull-628.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
"Now, I will tell you something Mr. Michael which may amaze you. People
occasionally tell half-truths and lie about things. Make sure to quote
me Mr. Michael. I will be disappointed if you don't. Sometimes telling
half-truths, white lies, etc. is important for self-preservation and to
achieve certain ends." <END>
NEED I SAY MORE!?
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4186tvsr4d3oiodp2nibbuvuj91rakvimb%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: UPDATED! B'nai Brith Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge
Against Capitalism, and Christianity V2.0 R_1207
Message-ID: <4186tvsr4d3oiodp2...@4ax.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2003 12:48:39 GMT
Ken Lewis
wrote:
>On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 22:28:20 GMT, <swfcqjy139xr$.9tjgn3ey...@40tude.net>
>Gord McFee <gord....@rogers.com> wrote:
>>On 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT, Eb Dawson wrote:
>>> I forged nothing!!!!
>>INTRODUCTION
>>"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of my
>>posts prove so! You can't discern the difference."
>Very true!! My posts are replied to with continual verbal abuse and then I will
>occasionally answer the filth in a manner they deserve BUT the bulk of my posts
>are not name calling and personal attacks. I stand by what I state too!
LOL. If it weren't for your slander, name-calling, and personal
attacks you'd never have anything to post, Lardass.
Patrick Keenan
news:loos10deqh166lm68...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 22:28:20 GMT,
<swfcqjy139xr$.9tjgn3ey...@40tude.net>
> Gord McFee <gord....@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> >On 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT, Eb Dawson wrote:
> >
> >> I forged nothing!!!!
> >
> >INTRODUCTION
> >
> >"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of
my
> >posts prove so! You can't discern the difference."
>
> Very true!! My posts are replied to with continual verbal abuse and then I
will
> occasionally answer the filth in a manner they deserve BUT the bulk of my
posts
> are not name calling and personal attacks. I stand by what I state
Unless, of course, you're asked to stand by your statement of offer of a
"$10,000 Challenge". Then, you won't verify that you have sufficient funds
to make such an offer, and indeed, you'll deny making the offer (in the same
post as you offer it).
You stand by your statements to the point where you won't even acknowledge
that your "challenge" *has been accepted*.
So, how about it? Yes or no. Do you have the money to back up your
"$10,000 Challenge"?
-pk
Gord McFee
> Very true!!
INTRODUCTION
"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of my
posts prove so! You can't discern the difference."
EXAMPLES
"My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong you
dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!"
"You keep calling me "Fatboy" you stupid kike vermin. Why don't you put
your money where your big fat mouth is you Jew scum bastard?"
-- Message-ID: <grreuvc487rg2rg6f...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 22 Dec 2003 22:30:34 GMT
"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
-- Message-ID: <rpul00tk1ajl83bjl...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 18 Jan 2004 21:47:43 GMT
"Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook nose"
-- Message-ID: <02io001hb4aq4v5qv...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 19 Jan 2004 21:11:46 GMT
"BTW my name is not Blubberbury you pig fucker!"
-- Message-ID: <csmn109c84gsumkhr...@4ax.com>
-- Date: 31 Jan 2004 16:43:08 GMT
** All of the above from Scott Bradbury, who never calls people names and
is an expert in irony **
--