I Read the Article on Sara
Joe Bruno
Hilary pointed me to. I submitted a letter of my own. Of course, my
letter had a slightly different perspective than Sara gave them.
Frankly, I would not have divulged all those personal details about my
family history to anyone on the Internet. I use a nym to avoid
harrassment at home and at work.If someone wants to call my precaution
"cowardice", that's their opinion. Whatever turns you on, folks. Do
your thing. I wouldn't want to spoil your fun. Do you consider
everyone with an unlisted telephone number to be a "coward", too? The
way I figure it, using a nym helps to prevent me from falling into the
type of mess that Sara and Yale are in now.
I have one puzzling question that continues to reoccur. Other people
on this ng argue with Anti-Semites as much as Sara does. People like
Steve Wolk and Dr Mathis and Brian Blank and Susan Cohen are also Jews
who get involved in the fight. How come none of these people have
been hassled as much as Sara has? I used to fight viciously with all
the Anti-Semites, especially Ross. I fight with lots of people and I
have never even received a nasty email from anyone here on either
side. I will purposely not try and answer this question. Please supply
your own answers, if you care to do so.
Joe Bruno
Blakely
Because they do not have a history of lying and exploiting their own
families for sympathy like Sara Salzman does. In fact Joe, Sara was
the one who started this whole mess by bragging she was the first to
call Don Ellis and Doc Tavish pedophiles. I find Sara to be pure evil
or severely ill. Anyone who would endorse and stay with someone who
openly brags about training her 5-year old daughter at the time to be
a sexual domme has to be severely, severely disturbed. Actually Joe,
maybe we should treat her as someone suffering from a mental illness,
and show compassion and understanding toward her.
<space reserved for Salzman's jumping up and down>
PB
Sara Salzman
patbl...@hotmail.com (Blakely) wrote:
No jumping up and down. Just a simple request. When are you going to
stop lying and admit:
You lied when you said my children are "retarded."
You lied when you said I had a history of mental problems.
You lied when you said my daughter had an "ugly haircut."
You lied when you said my father is a "Freudian."
You lied when youn said his book was "out of date."
You lied when you made up a quote from Jeffrey Brown about Nizkor.
You lied when you said I have forged anyone's e-mail.
You lied when you said you had seen my daughter's birthday party
pictures.
You lied when you said I harassed Don Ellis and his family.
Sara
KCOM
You are a pedophile Ellis, and you have a felony conviction that says so.
Steve
Nicegoy
>From: patbl...@hotmail.com (Blakely)
>Date: 8/12/01 2:57 AM E. Australia Standard Time
>Message-id: <13739392.01081...@posting.google.com>
>
> Actually Joe,
>maybe we should treat her as someone suffering from a mental illness,
In ancient times, this affliction was treated by the patient having a crucifix
carved into their forehead.
It could serve a dual purpose in this case, the other being cosmetic surgery.
Joe Bruno
After reading that magazine article about her, I understand her
situation better and am more inclined to be sympathetic. Perhaps I was
expecting too much.
Joe Bruno
Jeffrey G. Brown
> Because they do not have a history of lying and exploiting their own
> families for sympathy like Sara Salzman does.
Sara neither lies nor exploits her family. You're a worthless chunk of wormshit,
Patsie/Donnie.
> In fact Joe, Sara was
> the one who started this whole mess by bragging she was the first to
> call Don Ellis and Doc Tavish pedophiles.
Cite the post, lying bigot.
JGB
================================================================== =====
Jeffrey G. Brown jg_b...@my-deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
Brian Blank
wrote:
I surmise that a large part of this is due to the fact that Sara is a
woman and therefore certain cowardly individuals perceived her as an
easy target to be intimidated.
For your information, Grosvenor did try to do the same thing to me on
another newsgroup that we both posted on and deliberately set out to
do harm to both my reputation and my business.
I did threaten him with legal action, but eventually just got him
booted off one ISP after another and his web hosting taken down.
I also think that because these people (and I use that term loosely)
hardly have one working brain cell between them, they find it
impossible to cope with more than one person at a time. Thus, thinking
Sara to be the easy target, they cannot and do not come after anybody
else.
Regards,
Brian Blank
Joe Bruno
I was taught one thing by a guy I worked for during the 1980s-most
people will always do things the easy way,even the intelligent ones.
They have other things to do.
Joe Bruno
Yale F. Edeiken
Joe Bruno <joeb...@indystart.com> wrote in message
news:4bc3e2e1.01081...@posting.google.com...
> I read the article on Sara Salzman in that on-line magazine that
> Hilary pointed me to. I submitted a letter of my own. Of course, my
> letter had a slightly different perspective than Sara gave them.
> Frankly, I would not have divulged all those personal details about my
> family history to anyone on the Internet. I use a nym to avoid
> harrassment at home and at work.
And doesn't that speak volumes as to the chilling effect of the actions
of such internet terrorists as Bradshit, Ellis, and Blakely that you cannot
exercise your freedom of speech without such risks.
Whiter you are a coward or not is irrelevant. That you tolerate such
activities and cooperate with them when it suits your moods imparts another
message entirely.
--YFE
The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/
Nicegoy
>Date: 8/12/01 5:15 PM E. Australia Standard Time
>Message-id: <nnacntg98qr4gtu7k...@4ax.com>
ROTFL... yeah Brian, you have em all terrified that you will snitch them to
their ISP!
How very jewish of you.
Nicegoy
>Date: 8/13/01 4:08 PM E. Australia Standard Time
>Message-id: <o9Kd7.3900$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>
>
>
>Joe Bruno <joeb...@indystart.com> wrote in message
>news:4bc3e2e1.01081...@posting.google.com...
>> I read the article on Sara Salzman in that on-line magazine that
>> Hilary pointed me to. I submitted a letter of my own. Of course, my
>> letter had a slightly different perspective than Sara gave them.
>> Frankly, I would not have divulged all those personal details about my
>> family history to anyone on the Internet. I use a nym to avoid
>> harrassment at home and at work.
>
> And doesn't that speak volumes as to the chilling effect of the actions
>of such internet terrorists as Bradshit, Ellis, and Blakely that you cannot
>exercise your freedom of speech without such risks.
>
> Whiter you are a coward or not is irrelevant. That you tolerate such
>activities and cooperate with them when it suits your moods imparts another
>message entirely.
>
>
> --YFE
BWAAAAHAHAHA good one Yale.
We have all seen the Nazi-hunter posts.
Brian Blank
I am not concerned about "terrifying" anybody.
Furthermore the action that I took was in defence of defamation
against me.
In retrospect it was hardly a clash of equals, Grosvenor makes you
look intelligent.
Regards,
Brian Blank
Joe Bruno
> Joe Bruno <joeb...@indystart.com> wrote in message
> news:4bc3e2e1.01081...@posting.google.com...
> > I read the article on Sara Salzman in that on-line magazine that
> > Hilary pointed me to. I submitted a letter of my own. Of course, my
> > letter had a slightly different perspective than Sara gave them.
> > Frankly, I would not have divulged all those personal details about my
> > family history to anyone on the Internet. I use a nym to avoid
> > harrassment at home and at work.
>
> And doesn't that speak volumes as to the chilling effect of the actions
> of such internet terrorists as Bradshit, Ellis, and Blakely that you cannot
> exercise your freedom of speech without such risks.
>
> Whiter you are a coward or not is irrelevant. That you tolerate such
> activities and cooperate with them when it suits your moods imparts another
> message entirely.
>
How do I "tolerate" such activities? How do I "cooperate" with them?
When someone insults me or hassles me on the ng, I strike back. Do you
think Sara never did anything to provoke me? At any rate, I am tired
of all the insults and fighting. No one wins in a mess like that. I
think you will see a difference in my posts.I could post things Sara
said to irritate me, but I'm tired of rehashing history.
Joe Bruno
Ken Lewis
>"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote in message news:<o9Kd7.3900$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>...
>> Joe Bruno <joeb...@indystart.com> wrote in message
>> news:4bc3e2e1.01081...@posting.google.com...
>> > I read the article on Sara Salzman in that on-line magazine that
>> > Hilary pointed me to. I submitted a letter of my own. Of course, my
>> > letter had a slightly different perspective than Sara gave them.
>> > Frankly, I would not have divulged all those personal details about my
>> > family history to anyone on the Internet. I use a nym to avoid
>> > harrassment at home and at work.
>>
>> And doesn't that speak volumes as to the chilling effect of the actions
>> of such internet terrorists as Bradshit, Ellis, and Blakely that you cannot
>> exercise your freedom of speech without such risks.
>>
>> Whiter you are a coward or not is irrelevant. That you tolerate such
>> activities and cooperate with them when it suits your moods imparts another
>> message entirely.
>>
>
> How do I "tolerate" such activities? How do I "cooperate" with them?
>When someone insults me or hassles me on the ng, I strike back. Do you
>think Sara never did anything to provoke me? At any rate, I am tired
>of all the insults and fighting. No one wins in a mess like that. I
>think you will see a difference in my posts.I could post things Sara
>said to irritate me, but I'm tired of rehashing history.
Well, we certainly don't see any difference with this post, fruitloop. Just yet
another excuse to drag Sara's name into damn near every post you make.
You tolerate the activities by the friends you keep and since Phillllllips and
Ross are the only friends you have on the newsgroup it speaks volumes about you
and your character.
--
The anonymous coward posting as 'Joe Bruno' is a habitual liar.
William Daffer
Nazihunter has nothing to do with any of us, despite your
imagination.
But we all realize that you want an excuse for your own
depredations, and so you must blame us for him.
whd
--
Joe Bellinger alters posts:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&th=ce84994e260d85fb,16&start=10&ic=1
Compare Msgs #12 and #13 for proof
Sara Salzman
(Ken Lewis) wrote:
I'm confused, Ken. Isn't this the same Joe Bruno who said:
"Thank you very much. We have a truce as of Sunday August 5, 1991 at
6:40 PM Pacific Daylight Time, which is when I had the chance to read
your agreement. I will consider you to be non-existent as of that
time. I have no desire to stop you from posting here or expressing
your opinion. Just pretend I don't exist and I will pretend you don't
exist. I hope that the others I mentioned in my offer will follow
your lead, MS Non-existent."
Joe Bruno
Watch it, Sara-you are responding to my posts also. You are breaking
the agreement as much as I am. You responded to my question about
stalking a nine-year old girl that was not even directed to you.
Joe Bruno
Joe Bruno
Good Heavens!!!! Kenny called me a "fruitloop!!!! My self esteem is
shattered. It looks like Ken is all through trying to impress us with
his ramblings of oriental philosophy. I thought alot more of Buddhism
before I learned he and Allan were involved in it.
Joe Bruno
Allan Matthews
joeb...@indystart.com says...
> I thought alot more of Buddhism
> before I learned he and Allan were involved in it.
A completely meaningless statement since you clearly knew nothing about
Buddhism before you foolishly called me an anti-Buddhist bigot.
But then your ignorance is not surprising, shit stain. After all, you
claim to be a Jew and yet seem ignorant of its fundamentals as well.
allan
--
allan_matthews[at]bigfoot[dot]com
=========================================
"I may be irrational"
- the BrunoBot
=========================================
http://www2.shore.net/~matthews/
Yale F. Edeiken
Joe Bruno <joeb...@indystart.com> wrote in message
news:4bc3e2e1.01081...@posting.google.com...
> "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote in message
news:<o9Kd7.3900$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>...
> > Joe Bruno <joeb...@indystart.com> wrote in message
> > news:4bc3e2e1.01081...@posting.google.com...
> > > I read the article on Sara Salzman in that on-line magazine that
> > > Hilary pointed me to. I submitted a letter of my own. Of course, my
> > > letter had a slightly different perspective than Sara gave them.
> > > Frankly, I would not have divulged all those personal details about my
> > > family history to anyone on the Internet. I use a nym to avoid
> > > harrassment at home and at work.
> >
> > And doesn't that speak volumes as to the chilling effect of the
actions
> > of such internet terrorists as Bradshit, Ellis, and Blakely that you
cannot
> > exercise your freedom of speech without such risks.
> >
> > Whiter you are a coward or not is irrelevant. That you tolerate
such
> > activities and cooperate with them when it suits your moods imparts
another
> > message entirely.
> >
>
> How do I "tolerate" such activities?
Do you really have to ask?
>How do I "cooperate" with them?
Do you really have to ask?
> When someone insults me or hassles me on the ng, I strike back.
Then give that right to others.
You do not.
You witnessed me being defamed for monts on end. You witnessed innocent
members of my family being attacked. You witnessed a deliberate attack upon
my employment. You winessed the same attacks on others.
Through it all you said nothing.
After sitting there with your thumb up your ass for months on end, your
only reaction was to suggest that the victims of these criminal acts shut
up.
> Do you
> think Sara never did anything to provoke me?
I know goddamn well that her children did not.
You have tolerated and cooperatd with attacks upon them.
The citizens of Bellville all hope
That Scotty learns how to use soap.
It's impossible to tell
With that horrible smell
How without gas masks they manage to cope.
Yale F. Edeiken
Nicegoy <nic...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20010813022144...@mb-fm.aol.com...
And you therefore read all the denunciations of him by virtually every
person here.
And you therefore know that the only effective action taken against him
was by John Morris who with, the help of Gorf McFee and Andrew Mathis
tracked him down. All three are now targets of the harassment for which you
use "nazihunter" as a justification.
In other words. sport, you are just another fascist ignorant of the facts
and unable to formulate a cogent arguments looking for a club with which to
silence the opponents who so regularly make you look like the dolt that you
are.
Ootha2831
>Date: 12/08/01 8:32 AM AUS Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: <20010811183248...@mb-fm.aol.com>
Your attempts at humour are getting to the point where you are little better
than a real low-life saying things such as the above Cummins. You do have
standards dont you?
J James
kmsp...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
The posts you made in the hours following your declaration that the
"truce" was in effect indicate you had no intention of keeping it.
You broke your word, repeatedly and without provocation.
Joe Bruno
> wrote in message news:<G%2e7.4067$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>...
> news:4bc3e2e1.01081...@posting.google.com...
> news:<o9Kd7.3900$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>...
> > > news:4bc3e2e1.01081...@posting.google.com...
> > >
> actions
> cannot
> > >
> such
> another
> > > message entirely.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> You do not.
HUH? I never stopped anyone from striking back at their attackers.
You have lost all your marbles, Yale.
Joe Bruno
>
> You witnessed me being defamed for monts on end.
WRONG-I don't read every post on the damn ng.
Joe Bruno
You witnessed innocent
> members of my family being attacked. You witnessed a deliberate attack upon
> my employment.
BULLSHIT- I saw no such attacks-I don't read every post on this ng-I
don't have the time. What makes you think I owe you a defense? I don't
know you from Adam and you've never done anything for me. I don't get
involved in other people's troubles unless I owe them for helping me
with mine. Do you know who has helped me when I was being attacked
here? Ross Cummins and Dick Phillips-I owe them and will pay my debt
to them. I don't agree with their views but I owe them for helping me.
I don't owe you shit, Jack.
Joe Bruno
You winessed the same attacks on others.
>
> Through it all you said nothing.
Question: What did you do while I was being attacked by people on this
ng? Nothing. Whatever gave you the idea that I owe you anything? I
don't know you from Adam, Jack and I don't owe you shit unless you do
something for me first. You really are a presumptuous character,
aren't you?
Joe Bruno
>
> After sitting there with your thumb up your ass for months on end, your
> only reaction was to suggest that the victims of these criminal acts shut
> up.
>
Are you a relative of mine? Are you a friend of mine? Have you ever
helped me with anything? NO NO NO to all 3. Therefore, I don't owe you
shit.
Joe Bruno
>
> > Do you
> > think Sara never did anything to provoke me?
>
> I know goddamn well that her children did not.
>
> You have tolerated and cooperatd with attacks upon them.
That's absolute bullshit. Where is the proof?
Joe Bruno
>
> The citizens of Bellville all hope
> That Scotty learns how to use soap.
> It's impossible to tell
> With that horrible smell
> How without gas masks they manage to cope.
>
> This citizen of San Diego, born in Chicago and proud of his military
service doesn't give two shits about what happens in Bellville or in
Allentown, since I have no friends or relatives in either place. No
one in either place has ever helped me with anything so I have no
debts to anyone in either place. After all the shit you and Sara have
been giving me here, I don't give a flying frig what happens to either
of you. Am I getting through to you?
Vi panimayoo?
Joe Bruno
>
--YFE
>
>
Ken Lewis
The brainless twit known as Joe Bruno still can't master his newsreader. She was
replying to me, you idiot, not you.
Ken Lewis
Whoever said I was involved in it? You are jumping to conclusions yet again,
Bruno. It is such a bad habit of yours. Right up there with your mind reading
and projection.
Ken Lewis
You don't know him from Adam, eh?
Say there lil' Joe, do I need to get the posts where you say you can get to know
someone personally from this newsgroup? ow about the one where you said you had
conducted emmail outside this group with Yale and respected him?
Seems like you are having problems with consistancy once again.
Doc Tavish
EXCEPT YOU!
We also can deduce from your sworn statement you submitted to the court that you
identified your self as being a copy cat nazihunter in December 1999.
You can't deny that you swore that you were threatened by my reply to
"nazihunter" when your name wasn't even mentioned. Everyone I've shown this to
thinks you made a "Freudian Slip" and confessed.
From the document being circulated known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT
AND ADMISSIONS ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
COMPLAINT
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
[...]
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<end>
1) Who identified himself as the Plaintiff?
2) Who claimed that he was threatened when I posted these words as he
stated them in his "complaint": <I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side">
Before I ask the third question I want to make sure you know the answers
to 1 & 2. Do you? Everyone I've showed this to has answered:
Yale F. Edeiken
3) Who did I address my remark to as a matter of legal fact? I state such
in my reply to which Yale F. Edeiken charged: "On December 18, 1999,
Defendant published the following threat to Plaintiff:"?
I addressed as shown in my reply- "nazihunter" YET Yale F. Edeiken charges
that I threatened him! Now I ask:
a) Who claimed to be threatened by me? <Yale F. Edeiken>
b" Who was I, in fact, replying to? <nazihunter>
4) Is it not logical to conclude that Yale F. Edeiken was nazihunter on
the night of December 14th? Everyone of sound mind and reasoning thinks
so!
Here is the post and how I replied in actual context:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded..
Date: 12/18/1999
Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
On 15-Dec-1999, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
> It seems that ever since Tavish's address was published, he
> seems to have disappeared.
> Has he fled?
> Or, better yet, has someone paid him a visit?
I'm standing behind you with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded
slowly squeezing the trigger for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-)
Sleep on that a while "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<END>
{Care to tell all of us why YOU were threatened Yale? The post above does not
have your name or e-mail address in it so why would you submit sworn testimony
(out of context too)
and claim that what I posted was threatening you? I have been waiting a long
time to get the answer! NO ANSWER! Scott Bradbury August 14, 2001}
Did Yale F. Edeiken or did he not implicate himself as being:
"nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>?
Did "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> post this just the night before?
From: "nazihunter"
Subject: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Anonymously posted.
The following is the address for Doc Tavish
Scott Bradbury
<address and telephone number deleted>
Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
<END>
Many believe that you used subpoenaed information to make death threats. Come to
Bellville and you'll be in my DA's jurisdiction!
Paul Kneisel
If I recall, a court determined that Bradbury himself was "Nazihunter." If
the court did not set damages it was because the court determined it had no
jurisdiction, not that its conclusions were wrong.
So Bradbury seems to continue the fascist Big Lie Technique: present
himself as "nazihunter," posts threats, then complain that he is
threatened. But Bradbury's use of the lie goes back at least four years,
does it not, to when he claimed that he was not Doc Tavish and that old Doc
had died.
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 01:14:37 GMT, "Doc Tavish"
<doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM>
Yale F. Edeiken
Again, it seems your reputation for dishonesty seems well earned.
No one ever stated that you "stopped" other from striking back. WHat
was stated was that you SUGGESTED that others refrain from doing so even
when the victims of harassment aimed at their families and their employment.
Thaw remainder of your lame defense for your toleration of such
harassment snipped.
Some scientists who study the brain
Went to Bellville, Scott Bradbury to train.
After several long years
of sweat, toil and tears
They taught Scott to come in from the rain.
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.com, tavi...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:9lciee$g0m$1...@slb6.atl.mindspring.net...
You are a liar.
> We also can deduce from your sworn statement you submitted to the court
that you
> identified your self as being a copy cat nazihunter in December 1999.
You are a liar.
> Many believe that you used subpoenaed information to make death threats.
Come to
> Bellville and you'll be in my DA's jurisdiction!
Not only have I been there bout I walked into his office and discussed
your various criminal activities with him. The we went for lunch together
at the Cottage Inn and told jokes about you.
He thinks that you are as crazy as a bedbug.
Some scientists who study the brain
Went to Bellville, Scott Bradbury to train.
After several long years
of sweat, toil and tears
They taught Scott to come in from the rain.
This post was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis who harass Jews, gays, and
those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In addition to posting
material such as this they employ such vicious tactics as direct criminal
harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them up for span email,
defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace harassment.
One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
in particular is:
R. Scott Bradbury
13 Mechanic Road
Belleville TX 77418
tavi...@ix.netcom.com
doc_t...@my-deja.com
This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
for his anti-Semitism is unknown but his anti-gay stance is seemingly based
on personal fears about his own sexuality. He has published many of his
fantasies which are homoerotic in nature and fix upon violent or forced
homoerotic acts.
Those who are opposed to such abuses of the internet are encouraged to
reprint this notice whenever this forgery or one like it appears.
Yale F. Edeiken
Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote in message
news:f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com...
>
> If I recall, a court determined that Bradbury himself was "Nazihunter." If
> the court did not set damages it was because the court determined it had
no
> jurisdiction, not that its conclusions were wrong.
No. What happened was that he was served with "Request for Admission."
Failure to answer constitutes an admission of the truth of the statements.
Bradshit never responded,
> So Bradbury seems to continue the fascist Big Lie Technique: present
> himself as "nazihunter," posts threats, then complain that he is
> threatened. But Bradbury's use of the lie goes back at least four years,
> does it not, to when he claimed that he was not Doc Tavish and that old
Doc
> had died.
Absolutely. He also neglects to punt out that, at the time his threats
were made he also accused several people, including me, of being "Nazi."
And he conveniently overlooks that he admits to making death threats.
But then, as usual, the anonymous poet hit the nail on the head.
Some scientists who study the brain
Went to Bellville, Scott Bradbury to train.
After several long years
of sweat, toil and tears
They taught Scott to come in from the rain.
--YFE
Doc Tavish
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>Some scientists who study the brain
>Went to Bellville, Scott Bradbury to train.
>After several long years
>of sweat, toil and tears
>They taught Scott to come in from the rain.
>
>This post was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis who harass Jews, gays, and
>those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In addition to posting
>material such as this they employ such vicious tactics as direct criminal
>harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them up for span email,
>defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace harassment.
>
>One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
>responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
>in particular is:
>
>R. Scott Bradbury
>13
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
Doc Tavish
>
>If I recall, a court determined that Bradbury himself was "Nazihunter."
THAT IS FALSE AND ONCE AGAIN YOU SHOW HOW STUPID YOU TRULY ARE!
>If the court did not set damages it was because the court determined it had no
>jurisdiction, not that its conclusions were wrong.
>
>So Bradbury seems to continue the fascist Big Lie Technique: present
>himself as "nazihunter," posts threats, then complain that he is
>threatened.
Edeiken admitted he was nazihunter in December 1999 and the othetr NAZIHUNTER is
a coawrdly little bastard who uses Canadian ISPs based in GToronto.
Paul Kneisel
<doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM>
<5ohkntksltc9mth54...@4ax.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:21:35 GMT, <f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com> Paul
>Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>If I recall, a court determined that Bradbury himself was "Nazihunter."
>
>THAT IS FALSE AND ONCE AGAIN YOU SHOW HOW STUPID YOU TRULY ARE!
>
Actually, the court documents on this read:
"REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
"3. Defendant Scott Bradbury has published material on the Internet
under the pseudonym 'Nazihunter'."
The Court found that all of the facts were deemed "admitted."
The scientific basis of Pierce's political views seems to be to lie your
head off about anything and then accuse the person who printed the truth of
printing falsehoods. Then follow it up with personal insults.
Moreover, in Bradbury's own words, they believe these rants show "how
stupid" their opponents are.
Paul Kneisel
as an "ENEMEY OF FREE SPEECH!!!!" Now he proposes it himself.
But listen to the otherwise so-brave neo-Nazi whine at ... well whine at
what? Getting hit with a blackjack? Getting stomped by half-a-dozen members
of the JDL? Having his property seized? Getting shipped to a camp? Being
forced to work as a slave laborer for the greater profit of I.G. Farben or
the House of Krup? Having his relatives murdered? Being murdered himself?
Or having "Bruno" rip his skin off as his opponents gleefully listen and
look?
No, the poor Stormtrooper can't handle being written about in a news group
of his choice on topics of his choice in the medium of his choice.
The horror! The horror!
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 04:51:46 -0500, Doc Tavish
<doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM>
Orac
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote:
Really? Do you have proof that Yale ever admitted he was Nazihunter?
Please post it.
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
Joe Bruno
You are full of shit, Yale. Since when does one of my suggestions
take away someone's right to say anything? I make suggestions all the
time that are ignored. You have ignored them yourself, you damn
twoface. Now, who is being dishonest?
It may startle you to learn that I don't have enough authority or
influence to stop anyone on this whole fucking planet from saying
anything they want. Am I getting through to you, asshole?
> Thaw remainder of your lame defense for your toleration of such
> harassment snipped.
You just can't get it through your thick skull, can you? You are not a
relative of mine. You are not a friend of mine. You have never helped
me with anything. Therefore, I don't owe you anything. What's more, I
don't have to justify myself or anything I do to you. You ain't my
Father or Mother or my boss. You ain't a judge presiding over my case.
You ain't a cop. Fuck off.
Joe Bruno
Doc Tavish
>On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 04:55:41 -0500, Doc Tavish
><doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM>
><5ohkntksltc9mth54...@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:21:35 GMT, <f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com> Paul
>>Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>If I recall, a court determined that Bradbury himself was "Nazihunter."
:
>>THAT IS FALSE AND ONCE AGAIN YOU SHOW HOW STUPID YOU TRULY ARE!
:
>Actually, the court documents on this read:
>
>"REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>
>"3. Defendant Scott Bradbury has published material on the Internet
>under the pseudonym 'Nazihunter'."
>
>The Court found that all of the facts were deemed "admitted."
:
Once again you are quoting Yale F. Edeiken and taking his word as to what is
true and I will once again show all just how stupid you are.
>The scientific basis of Pierce's political views seems to be to lie your
>head off about anything and then accuse the person who printed the truth of
>printing falsehoods. Then follow it up with personal insults.
>
>Moreover, in Bradbury's own words, they believe these rants show "how
>stupid" their opponents are.
:
If I was nazihunter then that would mean I was only threatening myself BUT
Yale F. Edeiken, in fact, did swear that I threatened him with my reply to
nazihunter. Care to admit now just how stupid your logic is when the facts are:
Courtesy of Ken McVay, director of Nizkor, and from Nizkor web site:
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
YALE F. EDEIKEN :
:
Plaintiff :
:
vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
:
SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a "DOC TAVISH" (Defendant)
COMPLAINT
[...]
<end>
<END>
been waiting a long time to get the answer! NO ANSWER YET! Scott Bradbury
August 15, 2001}
Did Yale F. Edeiken or did he not implicate himself as being:
"nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>?
Did "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> post this just the night before?
From: "nazihunter"
Subject: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Anonymously posted.
The following is the address for Doc Tavish
Scott Bradbury
<address and telephone number deleted>
Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
<END>
I do not see your name or <ya...@enter.net> in either anonymous post BUT you
testified when I replied to an anonymous psychopath that had just the night
before gave out my name, address, and telephone number and encouraged that I be
visited with baseball bats it was YOU who was threatened. How are you going to
explain this in future hearings?
PAUL KNEISEL- I NOW ASK YOU: IF I WERE NAZIHUNTER THEN WHY ON EARTH WOULD YALE
BE SWEARING THAT I THREATENED HIM WHEN I POSTED: "I'm standing behind you with
my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger for an
excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a while "nazihunter.""
Care to now admit that you are very stupid Paul and that all you want to do is
smear me rather than "report" what is really true? You are allying yourself with
a man who has greatly abused the legal system!
>>>If the court did not set damages it was because the court determined it had no
>>>jurisdiction, not that its conclusions were wrong.
>>>
>>>So Bradbury seems to continue the fascist Big Lie Technique: present
>>>himself as "nazihunter," posts threats, then complain that he is
>>>threatened.
You are really delusional and STUPID!
>>Edeiken admitted he was nazihunter in December 1999 and the othter NAZIHUNTER is
>>a coawrdly little bastard who uses Canadian ISPs based in Toronto.
Still as true as it was when I posted the FACTS!
Grow up Paul and quit being stupid.
Scott Bradbury
Doc Tavish
>Gee, time was that Bradbury would denounce anybody suggesting such a thing
>as an "ENEMEY OF FREE SPEECH!!!!" Now he proposes it himself.
>
>But listen to the otherwise so-brave neo-Nazi whine at ... well whine at
>what? Getting hit with a blackjack? Getting stomped by half-a-dozen members
>of the JDL? Having his property seized? Getting shipped to a camp? Being
>forced to work as a slave laborer for the greater profit of I.G. Farben or
>the House of Krup? Having his relatives murdered? Being murdered himself?
>Or having "Bruno" rip his skin off as his opponents gleefully listen and
>look?
>
>No, the poor Stormtrooper can't handle being written about in a news group
>of his choice on topics of his choice in the medium of his choice.
>
>The horror! The horror!
I DON'T LIKE LIES BEING TOLD ABOUT ME. I DON'T LIKE BEING DEFAMED. I DON'T LIKE
BEING THE TARGET OF LEGAL SYSTEM ABUSE. IT IS MT RIGHT TO REPORT HOW AN ATTORNEY
ACTS IN PUBLIC FORUM TO THE LAW OFFICE HE'S ASSOCIAGTED WITH. I WILL KEEP DOING
IT TOO YOU NITWIT!
KCOM
> In article <5ohkntksltc9mth54...@4ax.com>,
> Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:21:35 GMT, <f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com> Paul
> > Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
>
> > >If the court did not set damages it was because the court determined
> > >it had no jurisdiction, not that its conclusions were wrong.
> > >
> > >So Bradbury seems to continue the fascist Big Lie Technique: present
> > >himself as "nazihunter," posts threats, then complain that he is
> > >threatened.
> >
> > Edeiken admitted he was nazihunter in December 1999 and the othetr
> > NAZIHUNTER is a coawrdly little bastard who uses Canadian ISPs based
> > in GToronto.
>
> Really? Do you have proof that Yale ever admitted he was Nazihunter?
> Please post it.
Orac:
Old Bradbury likes to make those claims without going to the trouble
of getting proof doesn't he?
Steve
---------------------------
Get your professional spam free E-mail account at
http://mailcircuit.com/
Sara
KC...@Mailcircuit.com (KCOM) wrote:
Oh, his proof is usually "You didn't deny it when I said you were
nazihunter, therefore you are Nazihunter."
In other words, Scott Bradbury is a syphillitic, obsessive piece of
road-kill, because he hasn't denied it.
Sara
--
"It's always nice to see a prejudice overruled by a deeper prejudice."
John Sayles, _Lone Star_
PB
>In other words, Scott Bradbury is a syphillitic, obsessive piece of
>road-kill, because he hasn't denied it.
>
>Sara
Didn't you claim that your father determined DocTavish had OCD?
PB
Sara
<patbl...@hotmaill.com> wrote:
"Determined"? No. My father viewed a number of posts written by Scott
Bradbury and gave me an opinion. Not a "determination." Not a
"diagnosis." Merely am opinion.
I've answered your question, Mr. Blakely.
When are you going to address these lies?
You lied when you said my children are "retarded."
You lied when you said I had a history of mental problems.
You lied when you said my daughter had an "ugly haircut."
You lied when you said my father is a "Freudian."
You lied when youn said his book was "out of date."
You lied when you made up a quote from Jeffrey Brown about Nizkor.
You lied when you said I have forged anyone's e-mail.
You lied when you said you had seen my daughter's birthday party
pictures.
You lied when you said I harassed Don Ellis and his family.
Doc Tavish
<catamont-88C9E8...@news.concentric.net> Sara
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <8f4a80bb.01081...@posting.google.com>,
>KC...@Mailcircuit.com (KCOM) wrote:
>
>> Orac <or...@wlsfanmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:<orac-50E7E6.1...@news4.sucknews.com>...
>> > In article <5ohkntksltc9mth54...@4ax.com>,
>> > Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:21:35 GMT,
>> > > <f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com> Paul
>> > > Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > > >If the court did not set damages it was because the court determined
>> > > >it had no jurisdiction, not that its conclusions were wrong.
>> > > >
>> > > >So Bradbury seems to continue the fascist Big Lie Technique: present
>> > > >himself as "nazihunter," posts threats, then complain that he is
>> > > >threatened.
:
>> > > Edeiken admitted he was nazihunter in December 1999 and the other
>> > > NAZIHUNTER is a cowardly little bastard who uses Canadian ISPs based
>> > > in Toronto.
:
>> > Really? Do you have proof that Yale ever admitted he was Nazihunter?
>> > Please post it.
>>
>>
>> Orac:
:
>> Old Bradbury likes to make those claims without going to the trouble
>> of getting proof doesn't he?
>>
>> Steve
:
>Oh, his proof is usually "You didn't deny it when I said you were
>nazihunter, therefore you are Nazihunter."
I don't have to prove anything- Yale confessed it to a court of law as I show
again for the records and to all of your shame:
Courtesy of Ken McVay, director of Nizkor, and from Nizkor web site:
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
YALE F. EDEIKEN :
:
Plaintiff :
:
vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
:
SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a "DOC TAVISH" (Defendant)
COMPLAINT
[...]
<end>
<END>
been waiting a long time to get the answer! NO ANSWER YET! Scott Bradbury
August 15, 2001}
Did Yale F. Edeiken or did he not implicate himself as being:
"nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>?
Did "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> post this just the night before?
From: "nazihunter"
Subject: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Anonymously posted.
The following is the address for Doc Tavish
Scott Bradbury
<address and telephone number deleted>
Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
<END>
I do not see your name or <ya...@enter.net> in either anonymous post BUT you
testified when I replied to an anonymous psychopath that had just the night
before gave out my name, address, and telephone number and encouraged that I be
visited with baseball bats it was YOU who was threatened. How are you going to
explain this in future hearings?
>In other words, Scott Bradbury is a syphillitic,
Once again you are caught lying and smearing too. Care to prove that I am a
"syphllitic" you pile of pig grunt?
>obsessive piece of road-kill, because he hasn't denied it.
Yale confessed plain and simple. If he was NOT nazihunter then why did he swear
that I threatened him when I replied to "nazihunter"? Do any of you care to
answer why he would be threatened when neither "nazihunter" post in December
1999 bore any trace of being identified with him? I love how you swine deny the
obvious!
BTW what do you think of this you squealing pig?
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001 04:13:41 GMT, <Vz1e7.4061$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>
>Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote in message
>news:vZp4O82gMcTqnV...@4ax.com...
>> Bradbury shows us a typical fascist rhetorical technique in operation.
>> After the most defaming and vituperative series of posts against others he
>> claims that he is the one who is being harassed. Just like the Nazis
>> before him set up a fake Polish attack on a German radio station and then
>> announced that their invasion of Poland was a defensive reaction forced on
>> them by Polish aggression.
:
> As Chuck Ferree, a man that I am honored to refer to as a friend, used
>to say: "BINGO!"
I am glad to see you admit that you claim as a friend a man who made a death
threat against me. Here is the man you are honored to have as a friend:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&selm=32D4292B.52A4%40rio.com
From: Chuck Ferree (chu...@rio.com)
Subject: Re: Paranoiac Rage (was Re: Laughter is the Best Medicine)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power, alt.revisionism,
alt.politics.nationalism.white, alt.conspiracy
Date: 1997/01/08
Chuck writes:
doc tha crock, you tell your natsiewannabe pal, Raven, to lay off Mrs.
Clinton. Tha dumb shit can lie all he wants to about WW-II, which he
knows nothing about, or he can split-hairs about how many millions
were gassed at Auschwitz, you can push your right-wing agenda all you
want, but don't pick on the First Lady. If you continue to do this
low-life deed, the 12 guage can be stuck in your ear, where you will
hear the KA-BLAAAM....no pain though. Just daisies.
Doc Tavish wrote:
>
> Mark Raven wrote:
> >
> > eflo...@servtech.com wrote:
> > >
> > > kar...@explorer2.clark.net (Charles Power) wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> There is no question that Israel sold the information to the Soviet
> >
clips
> I don't give a damn what lefty Hillary likes either- her healthcare plan
> was socialist and rotten to the core. I hope she gets indicted AND
> convicted!
Won't happen, doc, she's innocent of any wrong doing. Now you on the
other hand??? Remains to be seen at your hearing.
Chuck
>
> Doc Tavish
~~End of EXACT GOOGLE Archive~~
It would only figure that Yale would be honored to have as a friend a person who
declared to me in public forum: " If you continue to do this low-life deed, the
12 guage can be stuck in your ear, where you will hear the KA-BLAAAM....no pain
though. Just daisies." which is just as much of a death threat as Yale aka
"nazihunter of December 1999"saying: "Why not call him and tell him what a nazi
prick he is. Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat."
BIRDS OF A FEATHER FLOCK TOGETHER OR SWINE THAT SLOP TOGETHER SHARE A MIRE!
SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEY
Waddle back to the mire!
>Sara
Doc Tavish
PB
>
>"Determined"? No. My father viewed a number of posts written by Scott
>Bradbury and gave me an opinion. Not a "determination." Not a
>"diagnosis." Merely am opinion.
>
>I've answered your question, Mr. Blakely
You actually said he agreed with Yale's assessment of Doc's diseased mind. I
personally think you are making this all up and never asked your father his
opinion at all.
I think Doc should once and for all, contact your father to discuss this on
a one on one basis to find out the truth. Surely Doc has the right to
challenge his opinion and since Leon doesn't post, you should have no
problem with this right? Unless it's all a lie.
PB
Sara
<patbl...@hotmaill.com> wrote:
> Sara whines in message ...
> >
> >"Determined"? No. My father viewed a number of posts written by Scott
> >Bradbury and gave me an opinion. Not a "determination." Not a
> >"diagnosis." Merely am opinion.
> >
> >I've answered your question, Mr. Blakely
>
> You actually said he agreed with Yale's assessment of Doc's diseased
> mind. I
> personally think you are making this all up and never asked your father
> his
> opinion at all.
I personally don't care what you think.
>
> I think Doc should once and for all, contact your father to discuss this
> on
> a one on one basis to find out the truth. Surely Doc has the right to
> challenge his opinion and since Leon doesn't post, you should have no
> problem with this right? Unless it's all a lie.
>
I have a problem with a psychotic from Texas harassing an 86-year old
man. I have a problem with the harassment you've _already_ caused my
problem. I have a problem with the forging of my father's name in this
newsgroup. I have a problem with _you_, Mr. Blakely, and your constant
lying.
When do you plan to address your lies?
Jeffrey G. Brown
> Surely Doc has the right
Lying bigoted cockroaches like Bradbury get no rights at all, save for the right
to be made into laughingstocks. They manage that quite well all by themselves.
When are you going to address the multitude of lies you've told, coward?
JGB
================================================================== =====
Jeffrey G. Brown jg_b...@my-deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
KCOM
I think Bradbury confuses paranoia for proof. Doesn't the word
road-kill make Bradbury hungry?
Steve
Paul Kneisel
little to use to shore up their difficulties. Bradbury, who a court found
had admitted being "nzaihunter" must try to avoid recognition by an endless
series of off-topic posts, questions that do not address his confession,
and simple insults.
But the Big Lie technique doesn't work.
All it accomplishes is to give the rest of us the opportunity to
demonstrate the deep dishonesty of Pierce's National Alliance supporters.
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:41:55 -0500, Doc Tavish
<doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM>
Patrick L. Humphrey
>On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:46:50 GMT, <ulF6O42HxYNv3j...@4ax.com> Paul
>Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
>>On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 04:55:41 -0500, Doc Tavish
>><doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM>
>><5ohkntksltc9mth54...@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:21:35 GMT, <f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com> Paul
>>>Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
>>>>If I recall, a court determined that Bradbury himself was "Nazihunter."
>>>THAT IS FALSE AND ONCE AGAIN YOU SHOW HOW STUPID YOU TRULY ARE!
>>Actually, the court documents on this read:
>>"REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>>"3. Defendant Scott Bradbury has published material on the Internet
>>under the pseudonym 'Nazihunter'."
>>The Court found that all of the facts were deemed "admitted."
>:
>Once again you are quoting Yale F. Edeiken and taking his word as to what is
>true and I will once again show all just how stupid you are.
Once again you're showing just how mind-bogglingly stupid YOU are, Fatbury
-- the court admitted those statements as _factual_. That's part of the
official court record, no matter how much a fat freak like you whines about
it.
Oh, and...HAPPY DEAD DOC TAVISH DAY! Woohoo!
--PLH, I'll have a Shiner Blonde
Patrick L. Humphrey
>On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:03:53 GMT, <RlR6OzwMa4RpK6...@4ax.com> Paul
>Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
>>Gee, time was that Bradbury would denounce anybody suggesting such a thing
>>as an "ENEMEY OF FREE SPEECH!!!!" Now he proposes it himself.
>>But listen to the otherwise so-brave neo-Nazi whine at ... well whine at
>>what? Getting hit with a blackjack? Getting stomped by half-a-dozen members
>>of the JDL? Having his property seized? Getting shipped to a camp? Being
>>forced to work as a slave laborer for the greater profit of I.G. Farben or
>>the House of Krup? Having his relatives murdered? Being murdered himself?
>>Or having "Bruno" rip his skin off as his opponents gleefully listen and
>>look?
>>No, the poor Stormtrooper can't handle being written about in a news group
>>of his choice on topics of his choice in the medium of his choice.
>>The horror! The horror!
>I DON'T LIKE LIES BEING TOLD ABOUT ME. I DON'T LIKE BEING DEFAMED. I DON'T
>LIKE BEING THE TARGET OF LEGAL SYSTEM ABUSE. IT IS MT RIGHT TO REPORT HOW
>AN ATTORNEY ACTS IN PUBLIC FORUM TO THE LAW OFFICE HE'S ASSOCIAGTED WITH. I
>WILL KEEP DOING IT TOO YOU NITWIT!
You're not being defamed, you fat freak. As you so conveniently forget to
remember, the allegations made by Yale about you were admitted by the court
into the record as FACTUAL, thus they can't be defamatory.
By the way -- HAPPY DEAD DOC TAVISH DAY, Blimpie!
--PLH, trying to be less recalcitrant and express how I REALLY feel :-)
Patrick L. Humphrey
Didn't you claim you had "100% proof" that I have a criminal record. Fakely?
By the way -- HAPPY DEAD DOC TAVISH DAY!
--PLH, glad Scottie didn't pick our wedding anniversary to play possum
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.com, tavishg 4...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
message news:5ohkntksltc9mth54...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:21:35 GMT, <f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com>
Paul
> Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >If I recall, a court determined that Bradbury himself was "Nazihunter."
>
> THAT IS FALSE AND ONCE AGAIN YOU SHOW HOW STUPID YOU TRULY ARE!
You can shout all you want, it will not change the finding of the Court
about the admssion that you made.
> >If the court did not set damages it was because the court determined it
had no
> >jurisdiction, not that its conclusions were wrong.
> >
> >So Bradbury seems to continue the fascist Big Lie Technique: present
> >himself as "nazihunter," posts threats, then complain that he is
> >threatened.
>
> Edeiken admitted he was nazihunter in December 1999
You usual lie. I never made any such admission.
The sign read "All You Can Eat."
They had vegetables, salad and meat.
Then Bradshit stopped by
And in the blink of an eye,
Three cooks gave up in defeat.
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.com, tavish48Wix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:p97lnt89gn9saoo01...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:46:50 GMT, <ulF6O42HxYNv3j...@4ax.com>
Paul
> Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 04:55:41 -0500, Doc Tavish
> ><doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM>
> ><5ohkntksltc9mth54...@4ax.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:21:35 GMT, <f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com>
Paul
> >>Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>If I recall, a court determined that Bradbury himself was "Nazihunter."
> :
> >>THAT IS FALSE AND ONCE AGAIN YOU SHOW HOW STUPID YOU TRULY ARE!
> :
> >Actually, the court documents on this read:
> >
> >"REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
> >
> >"3. Defendant Scott Bradbury has published material on the Internet
> >under the pseudonym 'Nazihunter'."
> >
> >The Court found that all of the facts were deemed "admitted."
> :
>
> Once again you are quoting Yale F. Edeiken and taking his word as to what
is
> true and I will once again show all just how stupid you are.
He is taking what you admitted to the Court.
> >The scientific basis of Pierce's political views seems to be to lie your
> >head off about anything and then accuse the person who printed the truth
of
> >printing falsehoods. Then follow it up with personal insults.
> >
> >Moreover, in Bradbury's own words, they believe these rants show "how
> >stupid" their opponents are.
> :
>
> If I was nazihunter then that would mean I was only threatening myself
Or other people who you erroneously claimed were "nazihinter."
[snip Bradshit's version of the big lie]
> Still as true as it was when I posted the FACTS!
Which means not true at all.
> Grow up Paul and quit being stupid.
He's not stupid enough to fall for your lies.
Yale F. Edeiken
Patrick L. Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk1ymc...@bermuda.io.com...
And a limerick about the Morbid Obesity to go with it?
Yale F. Edeiken
KCOM <KC...@Mailcircuit.com> wrote in message
news:8f4a80bb.01081...@posting.google.com...
Toy which the Morbid Obesity (as he is known in nay circles) will
resound with reams of babbling, none of which makes any sense whatsoever.
And, then, when nobody believes him, attack a all-you-can-eat buffet.
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish mailto:doc_t...@my-deja.com, tavi...@ix.netcom.com
You CAN'T prove your dishonest contention.
> Yale confessed it to a court of law
You are lying.
as I show
> again for the records and to all of your shame:
The only shame is to your parents, who raised a liar.
[remainder of the Morbid Obesity's babbling snipped for an explanation
of how he got that way]:
Yale F. Edeiken
PB <patbl...@hotmaill.com> wrote in message
news:9lesad$nej$1...@suaar1aa.prod.compuserve.com...
> Sara whines in message ...
> >
> >"Determined"? No. My father viewed a number of posts written by Scott
> >Bradbury and gave me an opinion. Not a "determination." Not a
> >"diagnosis." Merely am opinion.
> >
> >I've answered your question, Mr. Blakely
>
> You actually said he agreed with Yale's assessment of Doc's diseased mind.
I
> personally think you are making this all up and never asked your father
his
> opinion at all.
Odd, then, that I have a written preliminary opinion from him.
> I think Doc should once and for all, contact your father to discuss this
on
> a one on one basis to find out the truth.
He had a far simpler course which he failed to take.
He could have asked me to produce the opinion in court.
He -- or amy person repsenting hom -- whp contacts an expert witness for
an opponet in litigation is in deep trouble..
> Surely Doc has the right to
> challenge his opinion
He has no such right outside of a court-room.
Yale F. Edeiken
KCOM <KC...@Switchboardmail.com> wrote in message
news:128ac8d2.0108...@posting.google.com...
There are very few words that do NOT make the Morbid Obesity hungry.
The sign read "All You Can Eat."
They had vegetables, salad and meat.
Then Bradshit stopped by
And in the blink of an eye,
Three cooks gave up in defeat.
--YFE
Doc Tavish
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
>
Doc Tavish
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
>
>
Doc Tavish
>Pierce's boys show how increasingly desperate they are and how they have
>little to use to shore up their difficulties. Bradbury, who a court found
>had admitted being "nzaihunter" must try to avoid recognition by an endless
>series of off-topic posts, questions that do not address his confession,
>and simple insults.
>
>But the Big Lie technique doesn't work.
>
>All it accomplishes is to give the rest of us the opportunity to
>demonstrate the deep dishonesty of Pierce's National Alliance supporters.
The facts spoke for themselves you pinhead:
Doc Tavish
<catamont-022A5C...@news.concentric.net> Sara
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <9lemgs$idi$1...@suaar1ac.prod.compuserve.com>, "PB"
><patbl...@hotmaill.com> wrote:
>
>> Sara blabbered in message ...
>>
>> >In other words, Scott Bradbury is a syphillitic, obsessive piece of
>> >road-kill, because he hasn't denied it.
>> >
>> >Sara
:
>> Didn't you claim that your father determined DocTavish had OCD?
>>
>> PB
:
>"Determined"? No. My father viewed a number of posts written by Scott
>Bradbury
Were the posts in full context or were they the butchered out of context
versions Yale used in his "complaints"?
> and gave me an opinion. Not a "determination." Not a
>"diagnosis." Merely am opinion.
You are caught lying once again piglet! You posted he diagnosed me as having
OCD! Care to deny posting this piglet?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=catamont-1505002252290001%40ts016d19.den-co.concentric.net
From: Sara Salzman (cata...@concentric.net)
Subject: Bradbury's Documented Obsessive Compulsive Mental Disorder Shown to All
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2000/05/16
In article <3920c888....@news.flash.net>,
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com drooled:
[snip the usual re-post of Bradbury's halucinatory spew]
>
>Only an obsessive compulsive person would repeat the following over 90
>times. You have a mental disorder Yale! Also you should not be implying
>that I have a diseased mind either!
>
Ah, but Mr. Bradbury, I *HAVE* shown your public utterings to a
world-famous psychiatrist. He's a Professor Emeritus at Georgetown U
Medical School, former Chairman of the Dept. of Psychiatry at Tulane U
Med. School, former president of the American Psychoanalytic Assn,
founding member of the Washington School of Psychiatry, former Director of
Bronx State Psychiatric Hospital, author of a number of medical texts on
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, and Nobel Prize nominee.
And he certainly agrees with Yale's assessment of the state of your
diseased mind.
Especially when all you seem capable of these days is "squealing sow" comments.
As many of us have said before, seek help. Professional help.
Sara
~~End of EXACT GOOGLE Archive~~
How can my alleged condition be "documented" without a diagnosis? What is an
"assessment"? Is it also not the same thing as a diagnosis? Why would your
father agree with Yale F. Edeiken's "assessment"? Is Yale F. Edeiken a
psychiatrist? Is he qualified to be a psychiatrist? SEE HOW YOU VERMIN HAVE TO
RESORT TO SMEAR TO BELITTLE YOUR OPPOSITION?
You can never accuse me of being a "Holocaust Denier" no sirrreee!
You're filthy disgusting lying swine who has to resort to smear.
I DESPISE YOU FOR IT YOU PIG!
>I've answered your question, Mr. Blakely.
>You lied when you said I had a history of mental problems.
The way you act is tantamount proof!
>You lied when you said my daughter had an "ugly haircut."
I think you have an ugly hairdo. My mop has better styling than you and it's
cleaner too! http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/feature3-4.gif
>You lied when you said my father is a "Freudian."
You mean FRAUDian?
>You lied when you said I harassed Don Ellis and his family.
Didn't you have an e-zine radical try to snoop on Don?
SUE SUE SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEY
BTW your father is not a very ethical doctor to be giving "opinions" on someone
who has never had an office visit with him and tested by him and the assessment
being made public.
BTW you'll never ever see me DENY the Holocau$t!
>Sara
Doc Tavish
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
>
Doc Tavish
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.com, tavishg 4...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
>message news:5ohkntksltc9mth54...@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:21:35 GMT, <f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com>
>Paul
>> Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >If I recall, a court determined that Bradbury himself was "Nazihunter."
:
>> THAT IS FALSE AND ONCE AGAIN YOU SHOW HOW STUPID YOU TRULY ARE!
:
> You can shout all you want, it will not change the finding of the Court
>about the admssion that you made.
:
I made no admission. It was YOU who made the admission and swore to it. You also
did this criminal act against me before ytour malicious prosecution was served.
Once again for the archives:
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
COMPLAINT
[...]
<end>
<END>
Anonymously posted.
<END>
>> Edeiken admitted he was nazihunter in December 1999
:
> You usual lie. I never made any such admission.
You did in your statement shown above for all to see.
Live with it criminal.
>The sign read "All You Can Eat."
>They had vegetables, salad and meat.
>Then Bradshit stopped by
>And in the blink of an eye,
>Three cooks gave up in defeat.
---
Sara
doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM wrote:
> On 15 Aug 2001 21:40:55 GMT,
> <catamont-022A5C...@news.concentric.net> Sara
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <9lemgs$idi$1...@suaar1ac.prod.compuserve.com>, "PB"
> ><patbl...@hotmaill.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Sara blabbered in message ...
> >>
> >> >In other words, Scott Bradbury is a syphillitic, obsessive piece of
> >> >road-kill, because he hasn't denied it.
> >> >
> >> >Sara
> :
> >> Didn't you claim that your father determined DocTavish had OCD?
> >>
> >> PB
> :
> >"Determined"? No. My father viewed a number of posts written by Scott
> >Bradbury
>
> Were the posts in full context or were they the butchered out of context
> versions Yale used in his "complaints"?
>
Full context, Mr. Bradbury. Follow-ups and everything.
> > and gave me an opinion. Not a "determination." Not a
> >"diagnosis." Merely am opinion.
>
> You are caught lying once again piglet! You posted he diagnosed me as
> having
> OCD! Care to deny posting this piglet?
You delusional moron. Yes, I posted it. And yes, I said "And he
certainly agrees with Yale's assessment of the state of your
diseased mind."
THAT IS NOT A DIAGNOSIS, YOU IDIOT. That is an OPINION.
Show where, in the very post YOU just reproduced below, where the word
"diagnosis" is.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=catamont-1505002252290001%4
Show where I used the word "documented" in reference to his OPINION.
Show where I used the word "diagnosis" to describe my father's OPINION.
> What is
> an
> "assessment"?
Show me where I said my father gave an "assessment." He AGREED WITH AN
OPINION BY A LAYMAN, YOU IDIOT.
> Is it also not the same thing as a diagnosis?
NO. IT ISN'T. A DIAGNOSIS IS A DIAGNOSIS. AN OPINION IS AN OPINION. The
"assessment" was made by Mr. Edeiken.
> Why would
> your
> father agree with Yale F. Edeiken's "assessment"?
Because I showed him your delusional posts about "Bruno" and your
Cessna. Because I was curious what his OPINION of your posts would be.
> Is Yale F. Edeiken a
> psychiatrist?
No.
>Is he qualified to be a psychiatrist?
So only a psychiatrist can give an opinion?
Sorry. You're an idiot and a moron. ANYONE can give an opinion. Like
this:
It's my opinion that you are a raving lunatic.
It's my opinion that you're a liar and a coward.
It's my opinion that you are the laughingstock of Belleville, Texas and
alt.revisionism.
It's my opinion that someone who "fakes his own death" in a newsgroup is
a complete idiot.
It's my opinion that you are a syphillitic, obsessive piece of road-kill.
> SEE HOW YOU VERMIN
> HAVE TO
> RESORT TO SMEAR TO BELITTLE YOUR OPPOSITION?
No smears at all, Idiot. OPINIONS.
>
> You can never accuse me of being a "Holocaust Denier" no sirrreee!
>
> You're filthy disgusting lying swine who has to resort to smear.
>
> I DESPISE YOU FOR IT YOU PIG!
What a surprise.
[the remainder of bradbury's moronic spew deleted]
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
news:vdhkntkjqf9utp4ro...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 03:52:02 GMT,
<Clme7.4224$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>> >Some scientists who study the brain
> >Went to Bellville, Scott Bradbury to train.
> >After several long years
> >of sweat, toil and tears
> >They taught Scott to come in from the rain.
> >
> >This post was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis who harass Jews, gays,
and
> >those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In addition to posting
> >material such as this they employ such vicious tactics as direct criminal
> >harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them up for span
email,
> >defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace harassment.
> >
> >One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
> >responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this
one
> >in particular is:
> >
> >R. Scott Bradbury
> >13
>
> NOTE TO LURKERS:
> For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
> please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
> Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
> of their associates.
>
> Contact info:
And note the technique of this internet terrorist who, in another port
today, boasted of his criminal harassment. He does not like what I wrote
about him so he asks others to harass me at work.
And then he wines and moans because he gets sued.
The sign read "All You Can Eat."
They had vegetables, salad and meat.
Then Bradshit stopped by
And in the blink of an eye,
Three cooks gave up in defeat.
The post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
harassment.
One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
in particular is:
R. Scott Bradbury
13 Mechanic Road
Belleville TX 77418
tavi...@ix.netcom.com
doc_t...@my-deja.com
This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
for his anti-Semitism is unknown but his anti-gay stance is seemingly based
on personal fears about his own sexuality. He has published many of his
fantasies which are homoerotic in nature and fix upon violent or forced
homoerotic acts.
Those who are opposed to such abuses of the internet are encouraged to
reprint this notice whenever this forgery or one like it appears.
Doc Tavish
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>
>Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote in message
>news:f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com...
>>
>> If I recall, a court determined that Bradbury himself was "Nazihunter." If
>> the court did not set damages it was because the court determined it had
>> no jurisdiction, not that its conclusions were wrong.
:
> No. What happened was that he was served with "Request for Admission."
>Failure to answer constitutes an admission of the truth of the statements.
>Bradshit never responded,
You were required by your written agreement and by the disciplary rules to send
all materials to the attorney who contacted you telling you I was his client BUT
you didn't and it is on record too that your told my attorney "FUCK YOU" each
time he tried to get a copy of your complaints. Don't try to say I did not have
an attorney prior to Agust 25, 2000 becuse the docket shows you issuing a
subpoena to him re: 1999-C-2786 in July!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=6345ctceth31duniv70l4hafon88sdu3gq%404ax.com
From: NIZKOR WATCH (doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO_SPAM)
Subject: Re: Did I or Did I Not Have An Attorney Prior to August 25, 2000? YES I
Did! - Also Motions To Compel Answers To Discovery
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-03-28 17:32:03 PST
[...]
From: Sara (cata...@concentric.net)
(EXCERPT)
In article <dnmabtgedpcv2hbfa...@4ax.com>,
DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
[...]
> The ONLY reason Yale got that default judgment on August 25, 2000 was
> because he did NOT follow the written agreement he made with my attorney,
> which is on file, in which Yale F. Edeiken agreed to cease and desist
> from making ANY direct contact with me and that was on May 29, 2000 almost
> three months before Yale got his judgement against me.
Except you didn't HAVE an attorney. See below.
<<Doc Tavish Comment March 27, 2001: Yes I did have an attorney because
why would he have referred to me as his client in the May 29, 2000 e-mail
which Yale first denied and then later admitted existed?>>
> ~~~~~~~~~Proof of the May 29, 2000 Agreement~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> See this post:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=May+29,+2000&hl=&rnum=3&seld=945856619&ic=1
> From: Doc Tavish (doc_tavi...@my-deja.com)
> Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Attorney - Allentown, PA (Supreme Court ID#
> 40290) Recent Lies Documented UPGRADED R 2
> Date: 2000-12-30 18:30:42 PST
>
> >>> I have said before that I do have in my possession the hardcopy of
> >>> the e-mailings between my attorney and Tubby Edeiken. I'd imagine
> >>> that all of Tubby's snail mails I've FWD to my attorney will be presented
> >>> to court within a day or so showing Tubby Edeiken agreeing to not
> >>> make direct contact with me.
:
> >> Read it again, Bradshit. It says nothing of the kind.
<<Doc Tavish comment March 27, 2001: If the e-mail had not existed then
why would Yale say read it again?>>
> >>> From: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
> >>> Message ID: <001501bfc9d5$2ddae340$d99c10cf!oemcomputer>
> >>> To: xxx...@aol.com <(just deleted my attorney's e-mail address)
> >>> References: <e8.501626...@aol.com
> >>> Subject: Re: Edeiken v. Bradbury
> >>> Date: Mon, May 29 2000 21:20:00 -0400
> >>> [...] My attorney did in fact say:
> >>> > Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
> >>> > any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney.
> >>> > Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry.
:
> Yale did in fact reply:
> >>> If this confirms your representation I certainly will.
To which Daylin Leach responded in the negative.
<<Daylin Leach did NOT reply in the negative! He had already said:
"Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney." How is
that replying in the negative? He referred to me using "my client" which
proves you to be a liar! Remember Yale later admitted in this post that
the e-mail existed! Care to stay in denial pig? Here is what you deleted:
From the very post (above) which you gutted:
>>> Please God in the Heavens above let Yale deny publicly the authenticity
>>> of the above communication! I will be a very good boy too!
:
>> Why should I deny it. It proves you have been lying.
(Notice that Yale has called me a liar from the beginning concerning an
e-mail communication between my attorney and him and how he denied such
e-mail existed and Yale even suggested that I forged it BUT now he admits
it exists and at the same time calls me the liar!? Does the term
pathological liar ring a bell?)... End of Doc Tavish Comment>>
Therefore, there was no agreement, since Mr. Leach did NOT bother to
file an appearance until AUGUST 28, 2000.
<<Doc Tavish comment March 27, 2001: How could my attorney file an
appearance- he didn't even have a copy of the complaint and when he tried
to get a copy Yale responded with "Fuck You" which has been admitted to
court! Care to deny that Yale does not furnish his "victims" with copies
of complaints? He did the same thing to David Michael too! Care to deny
it?
LOOK!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=attorney=&rnum=2&seld=987531613&ic=1
Message-ID: <39BBB347...@onetel.net.uk>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 17:13:59 +0100
From: david_michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: The other Edeiken lawsuit
NNTP-Posting-Host: async170-6.nas.onetel.net.uk
X-Trace: 10 Sep 2000 17:14:15 GMT, async170-6.nas.onetel.net.uk
[...]
Mr Edeiken has filed a lawsuit against me in Pennsylvania. No documents
were ever served on me with regard to this lawsuit. Moreover, it stated
no cause of action. As Mr Edeiken had obviously assumed that I would
chicken out, allowing the thing simply to lapse unserved, I appointed an
attorney in PA to deal with him in a very non-chickenly way.
I recently received a communication from that attorney's paralegal that
stated, inter alia:
<begin quote>
Please be advised that we have filed the Rule to Show Cause in your
case. Mr. Edeiken must now move forward with this matter and file a
complaint . . . we are awaiting the statutory allowed time period during
which Mr. Edeiken can make a response.
<end quote>
Mr Edeiken evidently thought that he could use the law to silence
certain revisionist posters here.
We are now waiting for HIM to produce his arguments and evidence and
place them before the courts where he may rest assured that they will
meet a vigorous response.
~~End Of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Notice that Yale F. Edeiken did NOT serve his complaint on David either!
end of Doc Tavish Comment>>
Face it, Mr. Bradbury, your so-called attorney didn't EXIST as your
attorney until he FILED HIS APPEARANCE in August. It is not Mr.
Edeiken's responsibility to pretend you have an attorney when the person
you claim is your attorney never bothered to file.
<<Doc Tavish comment March 27, 2001: How could my attorney who told
Edeiken on May 29, 2000 that I was his client file when he had not
received the complaint? Edeiken did my attorney the same way he did
David's! As for me not having an attorney then why did Yale F. Edeiken
on "July 14, 2000 PLTF'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY UPON DAYLIN LEACH. AFDT OF SERVICE
ATTACHED." This is on the docket of Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
and anyone may obtain the docket for $3.00 and here is how
Andrea Naugle -- Clerk Civil Court
Lehigh County Court House
Room 202
4555 West Hamilton Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1614
610-782-3148
and "Request Docket Printout for Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786"
I did have an attorney as established on July 14, 2000! Why would Yale be
wanting to subpoena my attorney in Edeiken Vs Bradbury if I didn't have an
attorney!? Once again my enemies lie! End of Doc Tavish Comment>>
In fact, on FEBRUARY 7th, 2001, YOUR ATTORNEY TOLD JUDGE REIBMAN THAT
YOU HAD NO REPRESENTATION PRIOR TO AUGUST 28, in other words, you were
NOT represented when the default judgement was handed down.
<<Doc Tavish comment March 27, 2001: Once again you lie because the docket
shows the above intent to serve a subpoena and also Edeiken acknowledged
on May 29, 2000 that I had an attorney!>>
It's in writing, Mr. Bradbury. Perhaps a remedial reading course might
be of some help to you.
<<You acting like a pig doesn't win arguments bitch! How many lies have I
caught you in lately? MANY! You need to take a remedial course concerning
telling the truth and dealing with FACTS>>
~~End of One Group of Lies Told By My Enemies~~
It's all documented Pig Salzman and once again you are caught telling
lies. If I did not have an attorney prior to August 28, 2000 then explain
the May 29, 2000 e-mail and the subpoena to my attorney who you said:
"Face it, Mr. Bradbury, your so-called attorney didn't EXIST as your
attorney until he FILED HIS APPEARANCE in August." which showed on the
docket: "July 14, 2000 PLTF'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO
PRODUCE DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY UPON DAYLIN LEACH. AFDT OF
SERVICE ATTACHED."
IF MY ATTORNEY DID NOT EXIST THEN WHY DID YALE ISSUE THAT JULY 14, 2000
SUBPOENA? ALSO AS FOR YOUR STATEMENT: "In fact, on FEBRUARY 7th, 2001,
YOUR ATTORNEY TOLD JUDGE REIBMAN THAT YOU HAD NO REPRESENTATION PRIOR TO
AUGUST 28, in other words, you were NOT represented when the default
judgement was handed down" HOW DO YOU KNOW? YOU WEREN'T THERE!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=affidavit=&rnum=6&seld=928412300&ic=1
From: Sara (cata...@concentric.net)
Subject: Re: Daylin Leach says
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-02-08 05:32:09 PST
In article <95tucs$6v3$9...@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Susie"
<su...@millersfield.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
> Hey, Sara... was ya there? And was Tavvy there?
I wasn't there, I admit I spoke to Yale who gave me the full story.
<end>
ONCE AGAIN YOU ARE THE MOUTHPIECE FOR ANOTHER PATHOLOLICAL LIAR-
YALE F. EDEIKEN
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
>> So Bradbury seems to continue the fascist Big Lie Technique: present
>> himself as "nazihunter," posts threats, then complain that he is
>> threatened. But Bradbury's use of the lie goes back at least four years,
>> does it not, to when he claimed that he was not Doc Tavish and that old
>> Doc had died.
You are terminally stupid Paul.
> Absolutely. He also neglects to punt out that, at the time his threats
>were made he also accused several people, including me, of being "Nazi."
>
> And he conveniently overlooks that he admits to making death threats.
Show where I have ever admitted to doing such.
> But then, as usual, the anonymous poet hit the nail on the head.
>
>
>
>Some scientists who study the brain
>Went to Bellville, Scott Bradbury to train.
>After several long years
>of sweat, toil and tears
>They taught Scott to come in from the rain.
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:03:53 GMT, <RlR6OzwMa4RpK6...@4ax.com>
Paul
> Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
>
> >Gee, time was that Bradbury would denounce anybody suggesting such a
thing
> >as an "ENEMEY OF FREE SPEECH!!!!" Now he proposes it himself.
> >
> >But listen to the otherwise so-brave neo-Nazi whine at ... well whine at
> >what? Getting hit with a blackjack? Getting stomped by half-a-dozen
members
> >of the JDL? Having his property seized? Getting shipped to a camp? Being
> >forced to work as a slave laborer for the greater profit of I.G. Farben
or
> >the House of Krup? Having his relatives murdered? Being murdered himself?
> >Or having "Bruno" rip his skin off as his opponents gleefully listen and
> >look?
> >
> >No, the poor Stormtrooper can't handle being written about in a news
group
> >of his choice on topics of his choice in the medium of his choice.
> >
> >The horror! The horror!
>
> I DON'T LIKE LIES BEING TOLD ABOUT ME.
But you like doing it to others.
>I DON'T LIKE BEING DEFAMED.
Nut you like to defame others.
> I DON'T LIKE
> BEING THE TARGET OF LEGAL SYSTEM ABUSE.
Nit you like the criminal harassment of others.
> IT IS MT RIGHT TO REPORT HOW AN ATTORNEY
> ACTS IN PUBLIC FORUM TO THE LAW OFFICE HE'S ASSOCIAGTED WITH.
An it is my right to sue you for harassing me at my workplace.
> I WILL KEEP DOING
> IT TOO YOU NITWIT!
And you will be sued again.
And eacj time you print personal information with an incitement for
others to assist in your campaign of harassment you will read this"
Doc Tavish
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
>
Doc Tavish
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
>
>
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.com, tabvish 4...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
message news:oghmnt40ao9l6brg2...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 03:59:30 GMT,
<Csme7.4225$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>
> "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote in message
> >news:f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com...
> >>
> >> If I recall, a court determined that Bradbury himself was "Nazihunter."
If
> >> the court did not set damages it was because the court determined it
had
> >> no jurisdiction, not that its conclusions were wrong.
> :
> > No. What happened was that he was served with "Request for
Admission."
> >Failure to answer constitutes an admission of the truth of the
statements.
> >Bradshit never responded,
>
> You were required by your written agreement and by the disciplary rules to
send
> all materials to the attorney who contacted you telling you I was his
client
You are a liar.
There is no such "written agreement."
There is no such rule. The LAW is that it all goes to the litigant
until an Entry of Appearance is filed and served uipon me. No "rule" may
abrogate that law.
BUT
> you didn't and it is on record too that your told my attorney "FUCK YOU"
each
> time he tried to get a copy of your complaints.
That is a lie. He never at any time requested a copy of the Complaint.
Don't try to say I did not have
> an attorney prior to Agust 25, 2000 becuse the docket shows you issuing a
> subpoena to him re: 1999-C-2786 in July!
The law is clear and specific. You are not represented by an attorney
until an Entry of Appearance was filed an served..
In fact, you fucking liar, you reporesented to the COURT that you were
unrepresented. If you paid an an attorney and he failed to file his
appearance, complain to him and about him..
[remainder of the lies from the Morbid Obesity snipped]
The sign read "All You Can Eat."
They had vegetables, salad and meat.
Then Bradshit stopped by
And in the blink of an eye,
Three cooks gave up in defeat.
The post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
harassment.
One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
in particular is:
R. Scott Bradbury
13 Mechanic Road
Belleville TX 77418
tavi...@ix.netcom.com
doc_t...@my-deja.com
This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
for his anti-Semitism is unknown but his anti-gay stance is seemingly based
on personal fears about his own sexuality. He has published many of his
fantasies which are homoerotic in nature and fix upon violent or forced
homoerotic acts.
Those who are opposed to such abuses of the internet are encouraged to
reprint this notice whenever this forgery or one like it appears.
--YFE
Doc Tavish
Your conduct is unbecoming of an officer of the court and seeing how your pals
have made it public record where you "practice law" it is my right to have your
employer informed how you are acting in public. Hopefully when he realizes the
ill will you create for him he just may give you a strong reproof or the boot!
Do you consider your behavior as honoring the Preamble of The Disciplinary
Rules?
"A lawyer's conduct should conform to the requirements of the law, both in
professional service to clients and in the lawyer's business and personal
affairs. A lawyer should use the law's procedures only for legitimate
purposes and not to harass or intimidate others. A lawyer should
demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who serve it,
including judges, other lawyers and public officials."
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/pa-code/query=*/doc/{t2}?
"Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (1999 edition)"
Your public posting does fall under "personal affairs." I don't see other
attorneys acting like you do! Why did Todd Miller give you the boot?
DOES ANY ATTORNET READING THIS WANT EDEIKEN AS A PARTNER? DOES EDEIKEN BRING
HONOR TO THE LEGAL SYSTEM?
>The sign read "All You Can Eat."
>They had vegetables, salad and meat.
>Then Bradshit stopped by
>And in the blink of an eye,
>Three cooks gave up in defeat.
>
>The post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
>who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
>addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
>as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
>up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
>harassment.
>
>One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
>responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
>in particular is:
>
>R. Scott Bradbury
>13
<address etc. deleted>
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
Doc Tavish
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
> In fact, you fucking liar, you reporesented to the COURT that you were
>unrepresented. If you paid an an attorney and he failed to file his
>appearance, complain to him and about him..
>
> [remainder of the lies from the Morbid Obesity snipped]
>
>The sign read "All You Can Eat."
>They had vegetables, salad and meat.
>Then Bradshit stopped by
>And in the blink of an eye,
>Three cooks gave up in defeat.
>
>
>
>The post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
>who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
>addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
>as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
>up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
>harassment.
>
>One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
>responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
>in particular is:
>
>R. Scott Bradbury
>13
<address etc. deleted>
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
>This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
This post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
harassment.
One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
in particular is:
R. Scott Bradbury
13 Mechanic Road
Belleville TX 77418
tavi...@ix.netcom.com
doc_t...@my-deja.com
This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
for his anti-Semitism is unknown but his anti-gay stance is seemingly based
on personal fears about his own sexuality. He has published many of his
fantasies which are homoerotic in nature and fix upon violent or forced
homoerotic acts.
Those who are opposed to such abuses of the internet are encouraged to
reprint this notice whenever this forgery or one like it appears.
--YFE
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
news:sngmnt84n63rdo98a...@4ax.com...
This post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
harassment.
One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
in particular is:
R. Scott Bradbury
13 Mechanic Road
Belleville TX 77418
tavi...@ix.netcom.com
doc_t...@my-deja.com
This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
for his anti-Semitism is unknown but his anti-gay stance is seemingly based
on personal fears about his own sexuality. He has published many of his
fantasies which are homoerotic in nature and fix upon violent or forced
homoerotic acts.
Those who are opposed to such abuses of the internet are encouraged to
reprint this notice whenever this forgery or one like it appears.
--YFE
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
This post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
harassment.
One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
in particular is:
R. Scott Bradbury
13 Mechanic Road
Belleville TX 77418
tavi...@ix.netcom.com
doc_t...@my-deja.com
This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
for his anti-Semitism is unknown but his anti-gay stance is seemingly based
on personal fears about his own sexuality. He has published many of his
fantasies which are homoerotic in nature and fix upon violent or forced
homoerotic acts.
Those who are opposed to such abuses of the internet are encouraged to
reprint this notice whenever this forgery or one like it appears.
--YFE
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 02:49:57 GMT,
<pxGe7.4351$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>
> "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.com, tavishg 4...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
> >message news:5ohkntksltc9mth54...@4ax.com...
> >> On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:21:35 GMT,
<f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com>
> >Paul
> >> Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >If I recall, a court determined that Bradbury himself was
"Nazihunter."
> :
> >> THAT IS FALSE AND ONCE AGAIN YOU SHOW HOW STUPID YOU TRULY ARE!
> :
> > You can shout all you want, it will not change the finding of the
Court
> >about the admssion that you made.
> :
>
> I made no admission. It was YOU who made the admission and swore to it.
You also
> did this criminal act against me before ytour malicious prosecution was
served.
>
> Once again for the archives:
---
> NOTE TO LURKERS:
The sign read "All You Can Eat."
They had vegetables, salad and meat.
Then Bradshit stopped by
And in the blink of an eye,
Three cooks gave up in defeat.
This post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
harassment.
One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
in particular is:
R. Scott Bradbury
13 Mechanic Road
Belleville TX 77418
tavi...@ix.netcom.com
doc_t...@my-deja.com
This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
for his anti-Semitism is unknown but his anti-gay stance is seemingly based
on personal fears about his own sexuality. He has published many of his
fantasies which are homoerotic in nature and fix upon violent or forced
homoerotic acts.
Those who are opposed to such abuses of the internet are encouraged to
reprint this notice whenever this forgery or one like it appears.
--YFE
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
The sign read "All You Can Eat."
They had vegetables, salad and meat.
Then Bradshit stopped by
And in the blink of an eye,
Three cooks gave up in defeat.
This post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
harassment.
One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
in particular is:
R. Scott Bradbury
13 Mechanic Road
Belleville TX 77418
tavi...@ix.netcom.com
doc_t...@my-deja.com
This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
for his anti-Semitism is unknown but his anti-gay stance is seemingly based
on personal fears about his own sexuality. He has published many of his
fantasies which are homoerotic in nature and fix upon violent or forced
homoerotic acts.
Those who are opposed to such abuses of the internet are encouraged to
reprint this notice whenever this forgery or one like it appears.
--YFE
The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
The sign read "All You Can Eat."
They had vegetables, salad and meat.
Then Bradshit stopped by
And in the blink of an eye,
Three cooks gave up in defeat.
This post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
harassment.
One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
in particular is:
R. Scott Bradbury
13 Mechanic Road
Belleville TX 77418
tavi...@ix.netcom.com
doc_t...@my-deja.com
This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
for his anti-Semitism is unknown but his anti-gay stance is seemingly based
on personal fears about his own sexuality. He has published many of his
fantasies which are homoerotic in nature and fix upon violent or forced
homoerotic acts.
Those who are opposed to such abuses of the internet are encouraged to
reprint this notice whenever this forgery or one like it appears.
--YFE
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
This post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
harassment.
One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
in particular is:
R. Scott Bradbury
13 Mechanic Road
Belleville TX 77418
tavi...@ix.netcom.com
doc_t...@my-deja.com
This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
for his anti-Semitism is unknown but his anti-gay stance is seemingly based
on personal fears about his own sexuality. He has published many of his
fantasies which are homoerotic in nature and fix upon violent or forced
homoerotic acts.
Those who are opposed to such abuses of the internet are encouraged to
reprint this notice whenever this forgery or one like it appears.
--YFE
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
The sign read "All You Can Eat."
They had vegetables, salad and meat.
Then Bradshit stopped by
And in the blink of an eye,
Three cooks gave up in defeat.
This post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
harassment.
One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
in particular is:
R. Scott Bradbury
13 Mechanic Road
Belleville TX 77418
tavi...@ix.netcom.com
doc_t...@my-deja.com
This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
for his anti-Semitism is unknown but his anti-gay stance is seemingly based
on personal fears about his own sexuality. He has published many of his
fantasies which are homoerotic in nature and fix upon violent or forced
homoerotic acts.
Those who are opposed to such abuses of the internet are encouraged to
reprint this notice whenever this forgery or one like it appears.
--YFE
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
You are a liar.
The sign read "All You Can Eat."
They had vegetables, salad and meat.
Then Bradshit stopped by
And in the blink of an eye,
Three cooks gave up in defeat.
notnicegoy
>Message-id: <f0Je7.4390$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>
Yale, you're not a very clever lawyer. See if McVay can land you a job as a
service station attendant.
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
You will note that, having been exposed as a list, all Bradshit can do
is ask for you to cooperate with him in harassing someone at his workplace.
The sign read "All You Can Eat."
They had vegetables, salad and meat.
Then Bradshit stopped by
And in the blink of an eye,
Three cooks gave up in defeat.
This post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
harassment.
One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
in particular is:
R. Scott Bradbury
13 Mechanic Road
Belleville TX 77418
tavi...@ix.netcom.com
doc_t...@my-deja.com
This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
for his anti-Semitism is unknown but his anti-gay stance is seemingly based
on personal fears about his own sexuality. He has published many of his
fantasies which are homoerotic in nature and fix upon violent or forced
homoerotic acts.
Those who are opposed to such abuses of the internet are encouraged to
reprint this notice whenever this forgery or one like it appears.
--YFE
The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
Paul Kneisel
admitted being nazihunter.
Pierce's National Alliance politics seems to produce people who are too
uncreative to do anything but repeat the old Nazi rhetorical style: accuse
others of doing what you're about to do; do it; proclaim that you were
defending yourself; demand that people protest the "other guy."
And this is coming from that part of the "White Race" who proclaims their
superiority to the rest of humankind.
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 23:03:19 -0500, Doc Tavish
<doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM>
warren2
> >>road-kill, because he hasn't denied it.
> >>
> >>Sara
>
>
Fakely?
He also claimed that the definition of a calorie changed in 1946.
He also claimed that there were no gas chambers in Treblinka but that only a
few people were killed in them.
He also claimed that he is no longer a denier, a revisionist, or an
antisemite.
He has not claimed, however, that he is no longer a liar and an imbecile.
sw
>
> By the way -- HAPPY DEAD DOC TAVISH DAY!
>
> --PLH, glad Scottie didn't pick our wedding anniversary to play possum
>
PB
>You delusional moron. Yes, I posted it. And yes, I said "And he
>certainly agrees with Yale's assessment of the state of your
>diseased mind."
>
>THAT IS NOT A DIAGNOSIS, YOU IDIOT. That is an OPINION.
di·ag·no·sis (dg-nss)
n. pl. di·ag·no·ses (-sz)
Medicine.
The act or process of identifying or determining the nature and cause of a
disease or injury through evaluation of patient history, examination, and
review of laboratory data.
The OPINION derived from such an evaluation.
A critical analysis of the nature of something.
The conclusion reached by such analysis.
Doc, give her a pig call on this one. I don't have the lungs.
PB
PB
<3YGe7.4361$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>...
>
>PB <patbl...@hotmaill.com> wrote in message
>news:9lesad$nej$1...@suaar1aa.prod.compuserve.com...
>> Sara whines in message ...
>> >
>> >"Determined"? No. My father viewed a number of posts written by Scott
>> >"diagnosis." Merely am opinion.
>> >
>> >I've answered your question, Mr. Blakely
>>
>> You actually said he agreed with Yale's assessment of Doc's diseased
mind.
>I
>> personally think you are making this all up and never asked your father
>his
>> opinion at all.
>
> Odd, then, that I have a written preliminary opinion from him.
Which Doc should of and failed at the time to have it squashed.
>
>> I think Doc should once and for all, contact your father to discuss this
>on
>> a one on one basis to find out the truth.
>
> He had a far simpler course which he failed to take.
>
> He could have asked me to produce the opinion in court.
Is the opinion in court records?
>
> He -- or amy person repsenting hom -- whp contacts an expert witness
for
>an opponet in litigation is in deep trouble..
That makes absolutely no sense. Try typing it again so we can understand
what you are saying.
>
>> Surely Doc has the right to
>> challenge his opinion
>
> He has no such right outside of a court-room.
Sure he does since you have made it a defamatory public statement. Don't
start making stuff up again Yale please. You were doing so well. And don't
even get started in the ethics of Leon releasing such information against
the will of Tavish. If you are so worried, get a court order to prevent
Tavish from contacting him.
PB
Sara
<patbl...@hotmaill.com> wrote:
> Yale F. Edeiken wrote in message
> <3YGe7.4361$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>...
> >
> >PB <patbl...@hotmaill.com> wrote in message
> >news:9lesad$nej$1...@suaar1aa.prod.compuserve.com...
> >> Sara whines in message ...
> >> >
> >> >"Determined"? No. My father viewed a number of posts written by Scott
> >> >Bradbury and gave me an opinion. Not a "determination." Not a
> >> >"diagnosis." Merely am opinion.
> >> >
> >> >I've answered your question, Mr. Blakely
> >>
> >> You actually said he agreed with Yale's assessment of Doc's diseased
> mind.
> >I
> >> personally think you are making this all up and never asked your
> >> father
> >his
> >> opinion at all.
> >
> > Odd, then, that I have a written preliminary opinion from him.
>
> Which Doc should of and failed at the time to have it squashed.
Should of? THAT'S an interesting turn of phrase, Mr. Blakely, isn't it?
>
> >
> >> I think Doc should once and for all, contact your father to discuss
> >> this
> >on
> >> a one on one basis to find out the truth.
> >
> > He had a far simpler course which he failed to take.
> >
> > He could have asked me to produce the opinion in court.
>
> Is the opinion in court records?
>
> >
> > He -- or amy person repsenting hom -- whp contacts an expert witness
> for
> >an opponet in litigation is in deep trouble..
>
> That makes absolutely no sense. Try typing it again so we can understand
> what you are saying.
>
>
> >
> >> Surely Doc has the right to
> >> challenge his opinion
> >
> > He has no such right outside of a court-room.
>
> Sure he does since you have made it a defamatory public statement. Don't
> start making stuff up again Yale please. You were doing so well. And
> don't
> even get started in the ethics of Leon releasing such information against
> the will of Tavish. If you are so worried, get a court order to prevent
> Tavish from contacting him.
>
> PB
>
>
--
PB
>In article <9lgqro$6fq$1...@suaar1ac.prod.compuserve.com>, "PB"
><patbl...@hotmaill.com> wrote:
>
>> Yale F. Edeiken wrote in message
>> <3YGe7.4361$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>...
>> >
>> >PB <patbl...@hotmaill.com> wrote in message
>> >news:9lesad$nej$1...@suaar1aa.prod.compuserve.com...
>> >> Sara whines in message ...
>> >> >
>> >> >"Determined"? No. My father viewed a number of posts written by Scott
>> >> >Bradbury and gave me an opinion. Not a "determination." Not a
>> >> >"diagnosis." Merely am opinion.
>> >> >
>> >> >I've answered your question, Mr. Blakely
>> >>
>> >> You actually said he agreed with Yale's assessment of Doc's diseased
>> mind.
>> >I
>> >> personally think you are making this all up and never asked your
>> >> father
>> >his
>> >> opinion at all.
>> >
>> > Odd, then, that I have a written preliminary opinion from him.
>>
>> Which Doc should of and failed at the time to have it squashed.
>
>Should of? THAT'S an interesting turn of phrase, Mr. Blakely, isn't it?
Why do I sense another manic episode from Sara coming soon?
I really feel sorry for you Sara, I really do. I urge you to seek
professional help.
PB,
Doc Tavish
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
>
>
>The sign read "All You Can Eat."
>They had vegetables, salad and meat.
>Then Bradshit stopped by
>And in the blink of an eye,
>Three cooks gave up in defeat.
>
>
>This post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
>who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
>addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
>as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
>up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
>harassment.
>
>One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
>responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
>in particular is:
>
>R. Scott Bradbury
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
>This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
>for his anti-Semitism is unknown but his anti-gay stance is seemingly based
>on personal fears about his own sexuality. He has published many of his
>fantasies which are homoerotic in nature and fix upon violent or forced
>homoerotic acts.
>
>Those who are opposed to such abuses of the internet are encouraged to
>reprint this notice whenever this forgery or one like it appears.
>
> --YFE
Your lies, harassment, and defamation (plus your web site) will ultimately
bring your down fall. Your behavior is unbecoming an officer of the court!
Doc Tavish
"PB" <patbl...@hotmaill.com> wrote:
>Sara jumped up and down in message ...
>
>>You delusional moron. Yes, I posted it. And yes, I said "And he
>>certainly agrees with Yale's assessment of the state of your
>>diseased mind."
What is an assessment? What responsible doctor would agree with a non-doctor's
assessment (diagnosis) and allow it to become public knowledge? That is smear
and for sure actionable. Your kind can only rely on smear and perhaps this is
why so many people turned their backs on your kind 60 years ago. No one wanted
you then and most people would turn their backs on you now.
Just because you have some loud mouth dupes who are quite vocal in the news
groups doens't mean the majority of people would lift one finger to help you.
YES- I belive in the "HOLOCAU$T."
>>THAT IS NOT A DIAGNOSIS, YOU IDIOT. That is an OPINION.
>
>di·ag·no·sis (dg-nss)
>n. pl. di·ag·no·ses (-sz)
>Medicine.
>The act or process of identifying or determining the nature and cause of a
>disease or injury through evaluation of patient history, examination, and
>review of laboratory data.
>The OPINION derived from such an evaluation.
>
>A critical analysis of the nature of something.
>The conclusion reached by such analysis.
>
>
>Doc, give her a pig call on this one. I don't have the lungs.
Hear is a good long winded one;
SUE SUE SUEY SUEY SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEEY
SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEYYYYYYY
SUE SUE SUEY PIG PIG PIG SUEY SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEEEY
SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEY
Man that last one left me winded! Now watch the pig come a running.
>
>PB
>
Doc Tavish
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
>news:37gmnts5ploadkpjv...@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:23:14 GMT, <PRF7O6uzYAu7Lb...@4ax.com>
>Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote:
[...]
>> >Oh, his proof is usually "You didn't deny it when I said you were
>> >nazihunter, therefore you are Nazihunter."
:
>> I don't have to prove anything- Yale confessed it to a court of law
:
> You are a liar.
Is that so? Is this not from your complaints and sworn statements being spread
by Ken McVay or is it not? Please do indicate where I quote you incorrectly!
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
COMPLAINT
[...]
<end>
<END>
Anonymously posted.
<END>
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
> --YFE
Doc Tavish
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>The sign read "All You Can Eat."
>They had vegetables, salad and meat.
>Then Bradshit stopped by
>And in the blink of an eye,
>Three cooks gave up in defeat.
>
>
>This post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
>who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
>addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
>as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
>up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
>harassment.
>
>One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
>responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
>in particular is:
>
>R. Scott Bradbury
<address etc. deleted>
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
>
Doc Tavish
<address etc. deleted>
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
>This individual is both an anti-Semitic and anti-gay activist. The reason
Doc Tavish
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>> >The sign read "All You Can Eat."
>> >They had vegetables, salad and meat.
>> >Then Bradshit stopped by
>> >And in the blink of an eye,
>> >Three cooks gave up in defeat.
>>
>> ---
>> NOTE TO LURKERS:
>
>The sign read "All You Can Eat."
>They had vegetables, salad and meat.
>Then Bradshit stopped by
>And in the blink of an eye,
>Three cooks gave up in defeat.
>
>
>This post to which I am responding was perpetrated by a group of neo-nazis
>who harass Jews, gays, and those who speak out to expose their bigotry. In
>addition to posting material such as this they employ such vicious tactics
>as direct criminal harassment of "enemies" and their families, signing them
>up for span email, defamation and invasion of privacy and direct workplace
>harassment.
>
>One of the ringleaders of this group of hate criminals and the one
>responsible for much of this harassment in general and, apparently, this one
>in particular is:
>
>R. Scott Bradbury
<address etc. deleted>
---
NOTE TO LURKERS:
For those sick and tired of this mentally disturbed shyster harassing me
please contact his employer and ask them if it is acceptable to
Trainor Law Offices for this deplorable conduct to be engaged in by one
of their associates.
Contact info:
Re: Yale F. Edeiken
Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: 10-10-220-1-610-434-7004
Fax: 10-10-220-1-610-434-6978
(Use 10-10-220 and all your call will be is one buck.)
>
Doc Tavish
"PB" <patbl...@hotmaill.com> wrote:
>Yale F. Edeiken wrote in message
><3YGe7.4361$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>...
>>
>>PB <patbl...@hotmaill.com> wrote in message
>>news:9lesad$nej$1...@suaar1aa.prod.compuserve.com...
>>> Sara whines in message ...
>>> >
>>> >"Determined"? No. My father viewed a number of posts written by Scott
>>> >Bradbury and gave me an opinion. Not a "determination." Not a
>>> >"diagnosis." Merely am opinion.
>>> >
>>> >I've answered your question, Mr. Blakely
>>>
>>> You actually said he agreed with Yale's assessment of Doc's diseased
>>> mind. I personally think you are making this all up and never asked your father
>>> his opinion at all.
:
>> Odd, then, that I have a written preliminary opinion from him.
:
>Which Doc should of and failed at the time to have it squashed.
How could I have had it squashed? I had no idea that the smear campaign was
being engaged in until I saw the smear posted.
>>> I think Doc should once and for all, contact your father to discuss this
>>> on a one on one basis to find out the truth.
:
>> He had a far simpler course which he failed to take.
>>
>> He could have asked me to produce the opinion in court.
:
>Is the opinion in court records?
:
>> He -- or amy person repsenting hom -- whp contacts an expert witness
>>for an opponet in litigation is in deep trouble..
You're a liar who likes making threats.
>That makes absolutely no sense. Try typing it again so we can understand
>what you are saying.
:
>>> Surely Doc has the right to
>>> challenge his opinion
:
>> He has no such right outside of a court-room.
You sure are quite a person to deny rights to others.