Sara Salzman on Posting Where People Live - Her Double Standards Strike Again!
Doc Tavish
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Subject: Re: Calling Philip Mathews; pleeze answer your telephone when we call
References: <0I64YO7M3877...@twistycreek.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/882f481b1f2fdf22
<1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:03:41 -0700
Message-ID: <catamont-C5A936...@news.giganews.com>
In article <1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
"Dr. Gassen Burnham" <gasenb...@dodo.com.au> wrote:
> Is that old hater still around....I figures cirrosis of the liver would
> have done the old sponge in by now.
One notes that Ross Cummins thinks posting Mr. Matthews' personal
information is a reasonable thing to do.
Sara
<END>
Everyone notice that Sara Salzman disapproves of her ally's "public information"
being posted YET she has no problems with such being done to her opponents!!
I.E.
"There's no crime in posting someone's publicly-available personal
information." cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: Pot. Kettle. Tavish.
Date: 1999/12/19
Message-ID: <catamont-191...@ts010d34.den-co.concentric.net>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/a6ab7af06ae55141
(Archived locally as: SDSpublicInfoPostingOkay_1)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/f14c47b77906fedc?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: SDSpublicInfo_1)
From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: Re: Nizkor Hurt My Itsy Bitsy Feelings! MUUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Date: 22 Aug 2000 03:33:04 GMT
Message-ID: <catamont-210...@ts011d31.den-co.concentric.net>
References: <0cjvpskea9f9avk0k...@4ax.com>
<8nrfei$1mql$1...@news.tht.net> <39A1416C...@onetel.net.uk>
<8nrh8l$i13$1...@nnrp1.deja.com> <8nror8$1urj$1...@news.tht.net>
In article <8nror8$1urj$1...@news.tht.net>, kmc...@nizkor.org wrote:
>David Michael asks:
>
> "Why is it right for you to publish public domain information but
>wrong for revisionists to do likewise?"
>
>I do not think it is wrong to publish information in the public
>domain, which is why I did not complain when Matt Giwer posted what he
>thought was my address and telephone number (it was not, as it was
>long out of date) in what was clearly an attempt to intimidate me.
>
>I _do_ think it is wrong to publish such information about people who
>are not involved here - Sara Salzman's neighbors, for instance. It is
>quite pointless, and obviously malicious in intent.
Ken:
I am appalled by this response of yours. You think it is acceptable for
the NIzkor Phone book to exist as long as those "not involved here" have
their information removed?
If Grovesnor published his own information, that's reasonable. So did Don Ellis.
But I never did, nor did I ever believe that engaging in debate online
would give anyone else "permission" to do so.
Sara
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/317382bebba5a006?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: SDSpublicInfo_2)
From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: Re: Yale Now Admits To Distributing Subpoenaed Information to a Group
of People aka Re: WHY ARE WEB-NAZIS SUCH DEADBEATS?
Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <catamont-160...@ts005d08.den-co.concentric.net>
In article <39221529....@news.flash.net>,
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
>On Wed, 17 May 2000 03:28:14 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
><iloU4.3589$v%5.26...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
[...]
>>> You are forever archived here with your lies about your subpoena issued to
>>> get my ulisted telephone number and unlisted address and your lies about
>>> YOUR mailing list. All admissable in court--- your recent words too!
>
>> None of which mean what you state they mean. Mailing something to a
>>group of people is NOT"a private mailing list."
>
>So now I do have you on record admitting to: "Mailing something to a
>group of people..."
>
>Thanks for the final admission asswipe!
>
>The "something" you mailed to a group of people was confidential
>information obtained using a subpoena. What you have confessed to is
>illegal activity!
Wrong again, anti-Lawyer.It's not confidential, it's PUBLIC INFORMATION.
<<Tavish comment March 3, 2006: That subpoena was NOT issued by the court or
else it would appear on the court docket of the court clerk and it is now
evident Yale forged a subpoena to get my information illegally and to distribute
it criminally. If that subpoena were legitimate then why would Yale lie about
serving one on my ISP and why doesn't it show on the court docket and why didn't
it have a court seal on it? All documented in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/393e3320dd44fda3?fwc=1
Subject: ...Forging Subpoenas and Fabrication of Evidence? Aren't Those Criminal
Acts? aka Re: Why won't Sara Salzman respond to her challenge being met by proof
being provided? V2.0 T_0931
Message-ID: <d06sj1h7s0d7hte8d...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Oct 2005 05:06:24 GMT>>
Sara
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/5cb758c1a64ade07?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: SDSpublicInfo_3)
From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: Re: ***STRAIGHT QUESTIONS FOR SALZMAN****
Date: 2000/08/27
Message-ID: <catamont-270...@ts001d13.den-co.concentric.net>
In article <bvoiqssv7v8nrlhf6...@4ax.com>,
doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com wrote:
>On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 11:59:47 +0100, david_michael
><david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
>I can answer those questions! :-)
>
>>Dear Ms Salzman
>>1. Were you paid for your interview with Westword? Yes or no?
>
>>2. Did you neglect to mention that many of the same tactics that you
>>purport to have been used against you are have also been used against
>>revisionist posters to this newsgroup?
>
>No.
Prove it, Liar.
<<Tavish comment March 3, 2006: Anyone reading the westword article will see for
themselves that you made no mention of you and your accomplices doing to your
opposition what you wailed about to westword. Care to deny it?
Page 1 https://den.secure.newtimes.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3.html
Page 2 https://den.secure.newtimes.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3_2.html
Page 3 https://den.secure.newtimes.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3_3.html
Page 4 https://den.secure.newtimes.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3_4.html
All archived locally as: PS I Hate You_1, PS I Hate You_2, PS I Hate You_3, and
PS I Hate You_4.>>
>>If so, why?
>
>It wouldn't have suited her purposes. How could she be a typical Jewish
>victim of "thuggery and hooliganism" if the truth came out that her side
>did the same and in fact started doing all that she whines about. Strange
>thing about Jews-- it's okay for them to harass people but when an eye for
>an eye and a tooth for a tooth is done to them they get all bent out of
>shape. I'm sorry but my heart does not bleed for the sow!
No one wants your histerical pity, Mr. Bradbury.
[...]
>What about having a lawyer abuse the legal system for free (because he has
>free access to the processes) and subpoena your unlisted telephone number
>and address and then distribute it via a mailing list and then turn around
>and say its PUBLIC DOMAIN?
I never did that. However, public domain *is* just what it says...
Sara
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Sara Salzman's other recorded double standards:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/18cc53b46de765f8?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Misses the Point Again aka Sara Salzman's Double Standards Pop Up
Again. Is Anyone Surprised?... U_0121
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:40:19 -0600
Message-ID: <a1l5t1h8jp2l1jf07...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/248cca2326c6e3c0?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Salzman's Double Standards Strike Again!..
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:00:28 -0600
Message-ID: <hm15v193q6pmn9end...@4ax.com>
See how Sara Salzman responded to the above and my reply to her squeals:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/535a3b60363ab7a6?fwc=1
Subject: Re: Sara Salzman's Double Standards Strike Again!..
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:06:55 -0600
Message-ID: <qin6v1dugeqlq935u...@4ax.com>
Tavish
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Joe Bruno
Doc Tavish wrote:
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:03:41 -0600
> From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
> Subject: Re: Calling Philip Mathews; pleeze answer your telephone when we call
> References: <0I64YO7M3877...@twistycreek.com>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/882f481b1f2fdf22
> <1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:03:41 -0700
> Message-ID: <catamont-C5A936...@news.giganews.com>
>
> In article <1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> "Dr. Gassen Burnham" <gasenb...@dodo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > Is that old hater still around....I figures cirrosis of the liver would
> > have done the old sponge in by now.
>
> One notes that Ross Cummins thinks posting Mr. Matthews' personal
> information is a reasonable thing to do.
>
> Sara
>
> <END>
>
> Everyone notice that Sara Salzman disapproves of her ally's "public information"
> being posted YET she has no problems with such being done to her opponents!!
>
> I.E.
Why do you expect Sara or anyone else to defend people who insult them?
I see no complaints by you when my address is posted.
Herr Doktor Tavische
<1141477610.1...@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "Joe Bruno"
<br...@indystart.com> wrote:
>
>Doc Tavish wrote:
>> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:03:41 -0600
>> From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
>> Subject: Re: Calling Philip Mathews; pleeze answer your telephone when we call
>> References: <0I64YO7M3877...@twistycreek.com>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/882f481b1f2fdf22
>> <1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
>> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:03:41 -0700
>> Message-ID: <catamont-C5A936...@news.giganews.com>
>>
>> In article <1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>> "Dr. Gassen Burnham" <gasenb...@dodo.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> > Is that old hater still around....I figures cirrosis of the liver would
>> > have done the old sponge in by now.
>>
>> One notes that Ross Cummins thinks posting Mr. Matthews' personal
>> information is a reasonable thing to do.
>>
>> Sara
>>
>> <END>
>>
>> Everyone notice that Sara Salzman disapproves of her ally's "public information"
>> being posted YET she has no problems with such being done to her opponents!!
What Art Tandy deleted which proves his and Sara's Jewish hypocrisy:
Ken:
Sara
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
[...]
Sara
Prove it, Liar.
[...]
Sara
>> I.E.
>
>
>Why do you expect Sara or anyone else to defend people who insult them?
The same could be asked of you!
>I see no complaints by you when my address is posted.
Why should I complain seeing how you have done such to me!
Civility is a two way street!
Ben Cramer
"Joe Bruno" <br...@indystart.com> wrote in message
news:1141477610.1...@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quite likely because they aren't currently posting your correct address, are
they joey.
How much kvetching would you involve yourself in if someone was to post your
current address in Alpine? Hmmmm?
>
Joe Bruno
I've never posted your address.
Joe Bruno
None.
> >
Joe Bruno
You idiots post other people's addresses and they aren't intimidated.
Why should I be?
> >
Joe Bruno
YOu can't even read what I wrote. Try again.
> >
Ben Cramer
And once again your appalling lack of comprehension ability rears its head.
You're a complete fuckwit joey.
>> >
>
Herr Doktor Tavische
<1141519782.3...@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> "Joe Bruno"
<br...@indystart.com> wrote:
>> The same could be asked of you!
>>
>> >I see no complaints by you when my address is posted.
>>
>> Why should I complain seeing how you have done such to me!
>
>
>
>I've never posted your address.
You did you liar.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Herr Doktor Tavische wrote
in message <m64l02hhurj6pnvok...@4ax.com>:
>On 4 Mar 2006 16:49:42 -0800,
><1141519782.3...@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> "Joe Bruno"
><br...@indystart.com> wrote:
>>I've never posted your address.
>
>You did you liar.
Well, *I* never have, and yet you stated that it was your goal to
discover mine and post it to intimidate me from posting.
Why the double standard, lard ass?
The Chief Instigator
>On 4 Mar 2006 16:49:42 -0800,
><1141519782.3...@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> "Joe Bruno"
><br...@indystart.com> wrote:
>>> The same could be asked of you!
>>> >I see no complaints by you when my address is posted.
>>> Why should I complain seeing how you have done such to me!
>>I've never posted your address.
>You did you liar.
Really? I guess that explains why no one else ever saw it...and it makes it
all the more odd that you didn't pitch a fit and stroke out when Ellis outed
you. Go figure.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Hartford 5, Houston 1 (March 4)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, March 5 at San Antonio, 4:05