Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

I like Ken McVay to fuck me in the mouth.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Kenneth McVay, OBC

unread,
Sep 6, 2001, 5:43:03 PM9/6/01
to

The "intellectual adventure" known as Holocaust denial still maintains
it's consistent "quality," I see.

It's amazing how these "revisionist historians" seem fixated on sexual
projection....

"The study, by Henry F. Adams et al in the August 1996 Journal of
Abnormal Psychology, found that the most-homophobic men were those
who, though not openly gay themselves, nonetheless had the strongest
homosexual urges, as measured by their penile circumference when being
exposed to homosexual films. The circumference of their penises on
such occasions was twice that of the normal (less-homophobic) male. On
the other hand, heterosexual films aroused them about 10% less (again
as measured by circumference) than normal men. What this suggests is
that if one happens to be bigoted against a particular group (in this
case, gays), then that bigotry is intensified by one's belief that one
is or might be oneself a member of that group." (Zuesse, Eric. Why the
Holocaust Happened: Its Religious Cause & Scholarly Cover-Up.
Charleston, South Carolina: Digitz.net, 2000. Page 78)


"Only in the general social-psychological literature will the reader
find discussions of the sexual obsession of the Nazis, but these
discussions, coming from scholars without specialized knowledge of
Nazi Germany, are fragmentary and only partially illuminating.<30> Nearly
all who treat this subject see it as an instance of psychic
projection. The theory of projection, advanced by Freud, postulates
that those who repress within themselves undesirable feelings and
impulses such as aggressive urges and sexual drives may seek relief
for the gnawing feeling of unconscious guilt by projecting their
illicit desires upon others and righteously attacking them, thereby
externaizing their feelings. This Freudian insight is declared to be
valid even by so skeptical a critic of psychoanalysis as H.J. Eysenck,
who summarizes it thus:

There is a tendency in people to attribute personal qualities
they themselves possess, but do not admit possessing, to other
people. Thus a person who is stingy but will not admit this to
himself will tend to attribute stinginess to others to quite
an unreasonable extent. Thus, similarly, those qualities which
the prejudiced person represses in himself tend to be projected
and attributed to other people; it is not the prejudiced person
himself but others who are seen as hostile and threatening,
or else his own weakness leads to exaggerated condemnation of
everything that is weak."<31>

Footnotes:

30. See for example Allport, G.W., "The Nature of Prejudice," New
York, 1958, pp. 349-355
31. Eysenck, H.J., "Uses and Abuses of Psychology," London, 1954. P. 274

(Goldhagen, Erich. "Nazi Sexual Demonology," Midstream, Vol. 27, No. 5,
May 1981, p. 11)

--
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0465021522/thenizkorproject:
Lying About Hitler, by Dr. Richard Evans
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393020444/thenizkorproject
The Holocaust on Trial, by D.D. Guttenplan

0 new messages