Jewish Control of Media
Leo Walsh
The following are some facts that should illustrate to any open-minded
person the reality of control of our media by organized Jewry.
The most obvious place to begin with would be the "Big Three" television
networks. These are no longer independent entities. When they were, all
three were headed by Jews from their inception. At ABC it was LEONARD
GOLDENSON (JEW), at CBS it was WILLIAM PALEY (JEW) and LAURENCE
TISCH (JEW) and at NBC it was DAVID SARNOFF (JEW) and then son ROBERT
SARNOFF (JEW).
ABC is now a part of the world's largest media conglomerate, Disney, with
total annual sales of over 16.5 billion dollars. Disney's CEO is MICHAEL
EISNER (JEW). Disney includes Walt Disney Television, Touchstone
Television, Buena Vista Television, the Disney Channel, five world-
renowned theme parks and two home video production companies. It also
includes Miramax Films, which is managed by the WEINSTEIN BROTHERS (JEWS).
The Disney Pictures Group, headed by JOE ROTH (JEW), includes
Touchstone Pictures and Hollywood Pictures. Disney owns ABC through its
acquisition of Capital Cities. ABC has 10 television station in such
major markets as New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia and Houston.
It also has 225 television network affiliates and is part owner of
several
European television production companies. ABC has a cable subsidiary
which owns ESPN, CEO of which is STEVEN BORNSTEIN (JEW), and owns
controlling shares in Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment
Network. ABC Radio Network owns 11 AM stations and 10 FM stations in
cities like New York, Los Angeles and Washington plus over 3400 network
affiliates. Capital Cities also owns 7 daily newspapers, Womens' Wear
Daily, Chilton Publishing and the Diversified Publishing Group.
The second largest media conglomerate on Earth is Time Warner, the
chairman of the board and CEO of which is GERALD M. LEVIN (JEW). It owns
HBO, world's largest pay cable network, as well as Warner Music, the
largest musical recording company on Earth (by far) with over 50 labels,
the largest of which is Warner Brothers Records headed up by DANNY
GOLDBERG (JEW). Warner Music's video production company is headed by
STUART HERSCH (JEW). It should be noted that Warner Music's involvement
with Interscope Records was instrumental in the popularization of so-
called "Gangsta Rap,"
a form of music which explicitly calls for Blacks to commit acts of
murder, rape and other violent crimes against Whites in general. Warner
Brothers Studio is big in the film industry and Warner's publishing
division is the largest magazine publisher in the United States with Time,
Sports Illustrated, People and Fortune. The Editor-in-Chief of the
publishing division is NORMAN PEARLSTINE (JEW). Warner also owns the
"Superstation" WTBS in Atlanta, which is also a national cable network,
as well as the Cable News Network and CNN-Headline News. Warner also has
a 20% share in CBS.
The third largest media conglomerate on Earth is Viacom, which is headed
up by SUMNER REDSTONE, born as MURRAY ROTHSTEIN (JEW). Viacom produces
and distributes television programs to the three major television
networks, owns 12 television stations, and produces feature films through
Paramount, headed by SHERRY LANSING (JEW). Viacom's publishing division
includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster and Pocket Books. They also own
Blockbuster Video with over 4000 stores nationwide. Viacom is the
world's largest provider of cable television programming and owns
Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon and several others. Viacom's fingers are also
into satellite broadcasting, video games and theme parks.
By the time one reaches the fourth largest media conglomerate on Earth,
you actually find one NOT under the direct control of a Jew! Rupert
Murdoch's News Corporation is most famous in America for Fox Television.
Murdoch's television production company and film studio are, however,
managed by
PETER CHERNIN (JEW).
The fifth largest media conglomerate on Earth is the Sony Corporation.
Its U.S. subsidiary is headed up by MICHAEL SCHULOF (JEW). Sony Pictures
is run by ALAN J. LEVINE (JEW).
CBS is headed by DAVID OBER (JEW). NBC's News Division is run by ANDREW
LACK (JEW). The executive producers of NBC's "Today," "NBC Nightly News"
and "Dateline" are, respectively, JEFF ZUCKER (JEW), JEFF GRALNICK (JEW)
and NEAL SHAPIRO (JEW). The ABC news programs "20/20," "Good Morning
America," and "World News Tonight," ("Where More Americans Get Their News
Than From Any Other Source") are produced, respectively, by VICTOR S.
NEUFELD (JEW), BOB REICHBLOOM (JEW) and RICK KAPLAN (JEW).
Perhaps the largest independent television production company in America,
New World Entertainment, is owned by RONALD PERELMAN (JEW). The chairman
of New World's board is BRANDON TARTIKOFF (JEW), the former chief of
NBC's entertainment programming division.
A major up-and-coming company which produces film, television programming,
animation features, and music is Dreamworks SKG, which was founded by
STEVEN SPIELBERG (JEW), JEFFREY KATZENBERG (JEW) and DAVID GEFFEN (JEW).
MCA and Universal Pictures are both owned by EDGAR BRONFMAN JR. (JEW),
who is also PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS.
Five Jewish controlled (owned and/or managed by Jews) movie production
companies, Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount and Universal
accounted for 74% of all box office receipts in 1995.
The New York Times was purchased in 1896 by ADOLPH OCHS (JEW). His great-
grandson ARTHUR OCHS SULZBERGER JR. (JEW) is its current publisher and
CEO. The Executive Editor is MAX FRANKEL (JEW) and the Managing Editor
is JOSEPH LELYVELD (JEW). The SULZBERGER FAMILY
(JEWS) also own 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe, 12
magazines, including McCall's and Family Circle with a circulation of
over 5 million each, 7 television and radio stations, three book
publishing houses and the New York Times News Service, which provides
articles, commentary and photos via wire to 506 newspapers, magazines and
news agencies.
The Washington Post was purchased in 1933 by EUGENE MEYER (JEW). It is
now run by his daughter, KATHERINE MEYER GRAHAM (JEW), the principal
stockholder, and board chairman, as well the sister of BOB GRAHAM (JEW),
a member of the United States Senate and the former governor of the
fourth-most populous state of Florida. Her son, DONALD GRAHAM (JEW), is
the publisher plus the CEO of the Washington Post Company which holds
various newspapers and magazines, particularly Newsweek. In a joint-
venture with the New York Times they publish the International Herald
Tribune, the most widely read English daily on Earth.
The Wall Street Journal is the largest U.S. circulation daily with a 1.8
million circulation on Monday through Friday. Its publisher is PETER R.
KANN (JEW), who is also the CEO and chairman of the board of Dow Jones &
Company Incorporated. Dow Jones publishes 24 other dailies and the
financial tabloid
Barron's.
Advance Publications was founded by the late SAMUEL NEWHOUSE (JEW) and is
today operated by his two sons, SAMUEL NEWHOUSE JR. (JEW) and DAVID
NEWHOUSE (JEW). It owns 26 daily newspapers, including the prominent
Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger and the New
Orleans Times-Picayune. Its owns the nations largest book publisher,
Random House, and its many subsidiaries. It also owns the Sunday
supplement Parade (circulation over 22 million weekly) and two dozen
major magazines, including The New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour,
Vanity Fair, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self, House & Garden and all
other publications of the Conde Nast group. Newhouse Broadcasting owns
12 television stations and 87 cable systems.
MORTIMER B. ZUCKERMAN (JEW) is the editor-in-chief and owner of U.S. News
& World Report. He also owns the Atlantic Monthly and the New York Daily
News.
The depraved Village Voice is owned by LEONARD STERN (JEW).
Three of the top six book publishers are owned by Jews. They are (#1)
Random House, (#3) Simon & Schuster and (#6) Time Warner Trade Group (the
Jewish domination of these three companies was established earlier in
this article). Western Publishing is a much smaller publishing house
that is the
leader in the field of childrens' books, in which it has a majority of
the market. Its CEO is RICHARD SNYDER (JEW), who recently replaced
RICHARD BERNSTEIN (JEW).
And there you have it. There is simply no question that representatives
of organized Jewry are VERY disproportionate in the highest ranks of the
media.
No doubt some of their apologists will ask "what is the proof that Jews
are using their positions in a conspiratorial manner?" The proof is the
very ability of such a small minority to so totally dominate the most
powerful industry in human history. They could not have done it by
chance. They have clearly worked together to provide as many media slots
to members of the "Chosen People" as possible. Their apologists will
also no doubt maintain that its just a coincidence that the U.S. media
constantly promotes degeneracy and perversion and has an overwhelming
bias that is pro-Jewish, pro-Black, pro-immigration, pro-Zionist, pro-
homoexual, pro-communist, anti-Western, anti-White, anti-patriotic, anti-
heterosexual, anti-liberty, anti-gun and anti-Arab.
I will leave it the readers to determine whether it really is a
coincidence.
If it is not a coincidence, then I'd say we all have a duty to work to
end this depraved, foreign influence in our midst, before they use their
power to effect further damage to our nation, our race, our culture and
our civilization.
I would be remiss in my duties if I did not acknowledge the debt I owe to
the research staff of National Vanguard Books, whose fine article "Who
Rules America" is the basis for this condensation. For a complete
catalog of all National Vanguard Book selections, contact them at P.O.
Box 330, Hillsboro,
West Virginia 24946.
NVB is the publishing arm of the National Alliance, America's, if not the
world's, foremost patriotic organization. They have a website at
HTTP://WWW.NATALL.COM
You can contact them at P.O. Box 90, Hillsboro, West Virgina 24946.
Chris Carpenter
On 16 May 1997 00:17:59 GMT, GEQ...@prodigy.com (Leo Walsh) wrote:
>The following are some facts that should illustrate to any open-minded
>person the reality of control of our media by organized Jewry.
[snip]
Excellent report.
Chris___________________________________________
Keith Morrison
CENT...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> I cannot stress this enough,without Jewish control of the media,the
> holocaust myth could never have taken off.This is the same type of
> propaganda that stated the Italians weren't good fighters in W.W.2(there
> are two British battleships that sit at the bottom of Alexandria harbor
> that indicate otherwise).
There were 3 battleships on the floor of Taranto harbour. Your point?
--
Keith Morrison
lone...@nbnet.nb.ca
CENT...@ix.netcom.com
I cannot stress this enough,without Jewish control of the media,the
holocaust myth could never have taken off.This is the same type of
propaganda that stated the Italians weren't good fighters in W.W.2(there
are two British battleships that sit at the bottom of Alexandria harbor
America?"at http://www.natvan.com
Mark Van Alstine
In article <3381B4...@nbnet.nb.ca>, lone...@nbnet.nb.ca wrote:
> CENT...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >
> > I cannot stress this enough,without Jewish control of the media,the
> > holocaust myth could never have taken off.This is the same type of
> > propaganda that stated the Italians weren't good fighters in W.W.2(there
> > are two British battleships that sit at the bottom of Alexandria harbor
> > that indicate otherwise).
>
> There were 3 battleships on the floor of Taranto harbour. Your point?
That "CENTURIO" has about the same understanding of Naval operations in
the Med during WWII and he does about the Holocuast? (Basically zilch.)
Major British/Italian Mediterranen Naval engagements/losses:
July 9-19,1940 Action off Calabria.
Italy: 1 cruiser sunk; 1 battleship and 1 cruiser seriously damaged.
Britian: No losses and only "negligible" damage.
November 11, 1940 Naval Air Assualt on Taranto.
Italy: 1 crusier sunk; 3 battleships left sinking in place;
2 cruisers badly damaged; 2 fleet auxilliaries sunk.
Britian: 2 aircraft.
February 9, 1941 Surface Raid on North Italy
Italy: Genoa and other ports bombarded.
Britian: No losses.
November 13-14
Italy: N/A
Britian: HMS Ark Royal torpedoed by U-81 and sinks while being
towed to port. (cf Blair, _Hitler's U-Boat War_, p.396-397.)
December 19-25, 1941 British Naval Disasters
Italy: No losses (frogmen escaped).
Britian: 2 battleships put completely out of action for months.*
1 cruiser and 1 destroyer sunk, other vessels put out of action
for months after hitting minefield. 1 battleship sunk by U-331,*
1 cruiser torpedoed shortly after.
*Blair cites that HMS Queen Elizebeth and HMS Valient were sunk
in shallow water from a frogman attack launched from the Scire'
and put completely out of action for months. Blair also cites
the U-331 sinking the HMS Barnam on November 25, 1941. One of
Barnam's magazines detonated and she sank withing three minutes,
taking half her crew down with her. (cf. Ibid., p.399,403)
Source: Dupuy & Dupuy, _The Harper Encyclopedia of Military History_,
Fourth Edition, pp.1169,1178-1179.
As for the Italians being good fighters or not in WWII, the record speaks
for itself: Italy invaded Egypt on September 13, 1940, and was completely
thrown out of Eygpt by the British by mid-December 1940. On Febraury 7,
1941, the British (i.e. O'conner's 2 divisions) had destroyed 9 Italian
divsions (130,000 POWs, 400 tanks, and 1,290 guns captured). British
casualties were 500 KIA and 1,373 WIA. The British invasion of Italian
East Africa (January 19-April 20, 1942) gained 360,000 sq mi of enemy
territory while taking 50,000 Italian POWs. British losses were 135 KIA,
310 WIA, 52 MIA. On May 18, 1941 Italian forces surrendered to the
British.
This, of course, does not count the Battle of Tunisia (May 3-13, 1943)
when U.S. and British forces kicked the Axis poerws out of North Africa.
The U.S. took 40,000 Italian POWs and the British 275,000 Italian POWs.
(It should be noted that the Italian Navy made no attempt at evacuation.)
Source: Dupuy & Dupuy, _The Harper Encyclopedia of Military History_,
Fourth Edition, pp.1168,1172-1174,1198.
Mark
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line separating good and evil passes
not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties--but
right through every human heart--and all human hearts."
-- Alexander Solzhenitsyn, "The Gulag Archipelago"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lu...@ibm.net
In article <3381B4...@nbnet.nb.ca>,
lone...@nbnet.nb.ca wrote:
>
> CENT...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >
> > I cannot stress this enough,without Jewish control of the media,the
> > holocaust myth could never have taken off.This is the same type of
> > propaganda that stated the Italians weren't good fighters in W.W.2(there
> > are two British battleships that sit at the bottom of Alexandria harbor
> > that indicate otherwise).
>
> There were 3 battleships on the floor of Taranto harbour. Your point?
>
> Keith Morrison
> lone...@nbnet.nb.ca
--------------
Keith,
Aren't you imitating the media. Who is controlling you?
LUOS
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
HM Murdock
In article <mvanalst-200...@rbi141.rbi.com>, mvan...@rbi.com
(Mark Van Alstine) wrote:
Quite an interesting post about the role of the Italians in WW II.
It does not however, address the fact that Jews are represented in the mass
media in numbers that are much greater than their percentage of the general
population.
For example, take Michael Eisner, Gerald Levin, and Sumner Redstone.
Are they, or are they not the CEO's of ABC-Disney, Time-Life-Warner-Turner?
Are they, or are they not Jewish?
Aren't the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and the New York published
by Jews?
Marlon Brando was pilloried because of his comments about the dominant role
Jews play in the entertainment industry. But no one really came out and
denied the truth of his statements.
Why is it that on issues such as gun control, or conflict in the Middle
East,we only get one side?
Considering the power the mass media has over our lives, maybe it would be
a good idea to look into who really controls it.
Years ago, it was decided that vital indistries such as rail transportation
and oil should not be controlled by monopolies.
Maybe we should apply that idea to the means of mass communication.
Regards,
HM
For more info-read "Who Rules America"
at
CENT...@ix.netcom.com
>
> > CENT...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > >
> > > I cannot stress this enough,without Jewish control of the media,the
> > > holocaust myth could never have taken off.This is the same type of
> > > propaganda that stated the Italians weren't good fighters in W.W.2(there
> > > are two British battleships that sit at the bottom of Alexandria harbor
> > > that indicate otherwise).
> >
> > There were 3 battleships on the floor of Taranto harbour. Your point?
>
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
Cent...@ix.netcom.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> excellent fighters,it was allied(Jewish)propaganda that said otherwise.What
does that have to do with the Holohoax anyway?(more
propaganda)Centurio. "Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line
MGirsch251
HM Murdock wrote:
>It does not however, address the fact that Jews are represented in the
mass
>media in numbers that are much greater than their percentage of the
general
>population.
This is probably true. Doesn't mean it's a "Jewish" conspiracy though,
unless you are paranoid.
>For example, take Michael Eisner, Gerald Levin, and Sumner Redstone.
WOW!!! THREE WHOLE NAMES!!! IT MUST BE A CONSPIRACY!!!
>Are they, or are they not the CEO's of ABC-Disney,
Time-Life-Warner-Turner?
Interesting point. Except Time-Warner is really run by Ted Turner. Last
time I looked, he was NOT a Jew. And DIsney himself was not a Jew, as a
matter of fact, he was quite the anti semite, so it would seem that
control of Disney would shift from person to person, not from Jew to Jew.
>Are they, or are they not Jewish?
Yes, they are. But what you not surprisingly fail to understand is that
they do not run these companies as "Jews" or "in the name of Jews". They
just happen to be Jews who did well in their careers and were given top
posts as a result of their hard work. God fucking forbid!
>Aren't the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and the New York
published
>by Jews?
WOW! THREE NEWSPAPERS!!! MUST BE A CONSPIRACY!!
But still, the fact is these three papers editorial columns don't agree on
ANYTHING, strange conspiracy if the conspirators are all advocating
different positions.
Ever heard of Rupert Murdoch? He owns a FEW newspapers, and the FOX
network.
>Marlon Brando was pilloried because of his comments about the dominant
role
>Jews play in the entertainment industry. But no one really came out and
>denied the truth of his statements.
LOTS of people denied the distortions of his statements. That must be
where you got confused.
>Why is it that on issues such as gun control, or conflict in the Middle
>East,we only get one side?
That's funny, because I hear a LOT about the Arabs point of view, and all
I ever see on TV is the Israelis bulldozing homes, or dispersing crowds.
Odd how we don't ever see the Syrian Army massacring its own people, or
the Iraqis. Maybe because Israel has a free press, and the Arabs don't?
As far as gun control, well, I know a lot of Jews who own guns, many are
members of the NRA.
>Considering the power the mass media has over our lives, maybe it would
be
>a good idea to look into who really controls it.
::sigh:: No SINGLE entity controls it. You are really stupid.
>Years ago, it was decided that vital indistries such as rail
transportation
>and oil should not be controlled by monopolies.
>Maybe we should apply that idea to the means of mass communication.
We have moron. READ these newspapers once in a while. I believe if you
approach them with an open mind you will see how different their editorial
opinions are. SOme are conservative (NY Post, Wall St Journal) some are
liberal (NY Times, Washington Post).
CENT...@ix.netcom.com
In article <mvanalst-200...@rbi141.rbi.com>,
mvan...@rbi.com (Mark Van Alstine) wrote:
>
> In article <3381B4...@nbnet.nb.ca>, lone...@nbnet.nb.ca wrote:
>
> > CENT...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > >
> > > I cannot stress this enough,without Jewish control of the media,the
> > > holocaust myth could never have taken off.This is the same type of
> > > propaganda that stated the Italians weren't good fighters in W.W.2(there
> > > are two British battleships that sit at the bottom of Alexandria harbor
> > > that indicate otherwise).
> >
> > There were 3 battleships on the floor of Taranto harbour. Your point?
>
> That "CENTURIO" has about the same understanding of Naval operations in
> the Med during WWII and he does about the Holocuast? (Basically zilch.)
>
> Major British/Italian Mediterranen Naval engagements/losses:
>
> July 9-19,1940 Action off Calabria.
>
> Italy: 1 cruiser sunk; 1 battleship and 1 cruiser seriously damaged.
>
> Britian: No losses and only "negligible" damage.
> November 11, 1940 Naval Air Assualt on Taranto.
Herr VanAlstine,Who publishes your history
books,Simon&Jewster?FYI:Italian units served with distinction in
Albania,Greece,Yugoslavia and North Africa.I suggest that you
read:Mussolini's Soldiers by Rex Tyre(Airlife Publishing Ltd.) Some of
the best Italian units fought alongside Rommel and at Stalingrad.
Again,don't believe the Allied(read Jewish)propaganda.By the way,what
does all of your information have to do with the holocaust?(or the price
of tea in China)Answer me if you dare!Centurio.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rbdwsn
MGirsch251 wrote:
>
> HM Murdock wrote:
>
> >It does not however, address the fact that Jews are represented in the
> mass
> >media in numbers that are much greater than their percentage of the
> general
> >population.
>
> This is probably true. Doesn't mean it's a "Jewish" conspiracy though,
> unless you are paranoid.
Did the pillage and rape of Palestine by the Jews constitute a
conspiracy or a fait accompli? Why not call the Jew takeover of the
White American media a fait accompli? You can't shout PARANOID about
that.
>
> >For example, take Michael Eisner, Gerald Levin, and Sumner Redstone.
>
> WOW!!! THREE WHOLE NAMES!!! IT MUST BE A CONSPIRACY!!!
>
> >Are they, or are they not the CEO's of ABC-Disney,
> Time-Life-Warner-Turner?
>
> Interesting point. Except Time-Warner is really run by Ted Turner. Last
> time I looked, he was NOT a Jew. And DIsney himself was not a Jew, as a
> matter of fact, he was quite the anti semite, so it would seem that
> control of Disney would shift from person to person, not from Jew to Jew.
Is a Jewish takeover a normal transfer of control? Yes, when Jewish
revenge is involved. Remember they are the people who say they "Never
forgive; Never forget" [learn, Ed.] You just proved my point above:)
> >Are they, or are they not Jewish?
>
> Yes, they are. But what you not surprisingly fail to understand is that
> they do not run these companies as "Jews" or "in the name of Jews". They
> just happen to be Jews who did well in their careers and were given top
> posts as a result of their hard work. God fucking forbid!
>
> >Aren't the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and the New York
> published
> >by Jews?
>
> WOW! THREE NEWSPAPERS!!! MUST BE A CONSPIRACY!!
>
> But still, the fact is these three papers editorial columns don't agree on
> ANYTHING, strange conspiracy if the conspirators are all advocating
> different positions.
>
> Ever heard of Rupert Murdoch? He owns a FEW newspapers, and the FOX
> network.
You really are an ignoramous. Murdoch is a JEW. Ha. Ha.
>
> >Marlon Brando was pilloried because of his comments about the dominant
> role
> >Jews play in the entertainment industry. But no one really came out and
> >denied the truth of his statements.
>
> LOTS of people denied the distortions of his statements. That must be
> where you got confused.
>
> >Why is it that on issues such as gun control, or conflict in the Middle
> >East,we only get one side?
>
> That's funny, because I hear a LOT about the Arabs point of view, and all
> I ever see on TV is the Israelis bulldozing homes, or dispersing crowds.
> Odd how we don't ever see the Syrian Army massacring its own people, or
> the Iraqis. Maybe because Israel has a free press, and the Arabs don't?
> As far as gun control, well, I know a lot of Jews who own guns, many are
> members of the NRA.
Many more are members of the JDL, the ADL and other criminally involved
Jewish terror organizations. If they serve in the NRA it's just to watch
and make sure anti-jewishism is kept to a minimum. If it begins to break
out, they report to their fellow parasites in the ADL.
>
> >Considering the power the mass media has over our lives, maybe it would
> be
> >a good idea to look into who really controls it.
>
> ::sigh:: No SINGLE entity controls it. You are really stupid.
> >Years ago, it was decided that vital indistries such as rail
> transportation
> >and oil should not be controlled by monopolies.
>
> >Maybe we should apply that idea to the means of mass communication.
>
> We have moron. READ these newspapers once in a while. I believe if you
> approach them with an open mind you will see how different their editorial
> opinions are. SOme are conservative (NY Post, Wall St Journal) some are
> liberal (NY Times, Washington Post).
But ALL reflect acceptable Jewish viewpoints. All within the boundaries
set and monitored by the oberjuden.
The stench is getting bad. To clear the air visit the National Alliance
Website:
http://www.natvan.com
Regards,
Bob Dawson
John Morris
In <33868A...@top.monad.net>, rbdwsn <rbd...@top.monad.net> wrote:
[snip]
>The stench is getting bad. To clear the air visit the National Alliance
>Website:
>http://www.natvan.com
The website for people who believe shit smells sweet and that Shinola
comes out of the back end of a dog.
--
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Scripture veteris capiunt exempla futuri>
--
The Nizkor Project | http://www.nizkor.org/
CENT...@ix.netcom.com
In article <8642181...@dejanews.com>,
lu...@ibm.net wrote:
>
> In article <3381B4...@nbnet.nb.ca>,
> lone...@nbnet.nb.ca wrote:
> >
> > CENT...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > >
> > > I cannot stress this enough,without Jewish control of the media,the
> > > holocaust myth could never have taken off.This is the same type of
> > > propaganda that stated the Italians weren't good fighters in W.W.2(there
> > > are two British battleships that sit at the bottom of Alexandria harbor
> > > that indicate otherwise).
> >
> > There were 3 battleships on the floor of Taranto harbour. Your point?
> >
> > Keith Morrison
> > lone...@nbnet.nb.ca
> --------------
>
> Keith,
>
> Aren't you imitating the media. Who is controlling you?
>
>media is purely coincidental.Your'e Nizkook tricks of accusing the accuser
>just won't work here.Better luck next time!
>http://www.natvan.com
>http://www.natall.com
> LUOS
Roger Hughes
In message <19970523192...@ladder01.news.aol.com> -
mgirs...@aol.com (MGirsch251) writes:
:>
:>HM Murdock wrote:
:>
:>
:>>It does not however, address the fact that Jews are represented in the
:>mass
:>>media in numbers that are much greater than their percentage of the
:>general
:>>population.
:>
:>This is probably true. Doesn't mean it's a "Jewish" conspiracy though,
:>unless you are paranoid.
No matter how one looks at it, there's something unhealthy about 75% of
the major media being in the hands of a people who are a mere 2.5% of
the population. I don't think its even debatable that they might be a
little biased for their side.
We have many people who bitch and complain if the Whites, who are the
majority, controlling something, but they apparently have no problem
with Jews being in control. The first case is completely normal, the
second is abnormal.
:>>For example, take Michael Eisner, Gerald Levin, and Sumner Redstone.
:>
:>WOW!!! THREE WHOLE NAMES!!! IT MUST BE A CONSPIRACY!!!
Silly boy! You would choke on all the Jewish names prominant in the
media. If we threw in all the Jewish script writers and lesser figures,
you'd need oxygen and CPR.
:>>Are they, or are they not the CEO's of ABC-Disney,
:>Time-Life-Warner-Turner?
:>
:>Interesting point. Except Time-Warner is really run by Ted Turner. Last
:>time I looked, he was NOT a Jew.
Turner works for Eisner. You don't know what you're talking about.
:>And DIsney himself was not a Jew, as a
:>matter of fact, he was quite the anti semite, so it would seem that
:>control of Disney would shift from person to person, not from Jew to Jew.
Whatever logic there is in this statement must exist in another
dimension, since I can't find it. Has this person every heard of a
company being sold? Yes, such things do occur. Disney's son sold the
company to Eisner. Is that hard to understand?
[snipped more idiocy]
:>>Aren't the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and the New York
:>published
:>>by Jews?
:>
:>WOW! THREE NEWSPAPERS!!! MUST BE A CONSPIRACY!!
Not just any newspapers, the three top newspapers. Throw in the Boston
Globe too. It's owned by the NY Times.
:>But still, the fact is these three papers editorial columns don't agree on
:>ANYTHING, strange conspiracy if the conspirators are all advocating
:>different positions.
Ha! For one thing, they all agree that one never criticizes Jews, except
within very, very, limited bounds. You can savage White people; you can
criticize Blacks if you're a little careful; but yoy never criticize the
Jews. They are only to be praised and sympathized with.
:>Ever heard of Rupert Murdoch? He owns a FEW newspapers, and the FOX
:>network.
Yes. I've heard of him.
Now, this guy really thinks he's made a big point by mentioning some
prominant Gentile amongst a whole gang of Jews, and trying to say that
proves there's no Jewish control. Absolutely amazing! Of course, it
never once dawns on him that Gentiles out-number Jews by 40 to 1. That
makes all his pathetic rebuttals even more hilarious.
:>>Marlon Brando was pilloried because of his comments about the dominant
:>role
:>>Jews play in the entertainment industry. But no one really came out and
:>>denied the truth of his statements.
:>
:>LOTS of people denied the distortions of his statements. That must be
:>where you got confused.
Dolly Parton and Robert Mitchem said essentially the same thing as
Brando - namely that Jews control Hollywood. Look, you're beating a dead
horse; even the Jews admit it.
:>We have moron. READ these newspapers once in a while. I believe if you
:>approach them with an open mind you will see how different their editorial
:>opinions are. SOme are conservative (NY Post, Wall St Journal) some are
:>liberal (NY Times, Washington Post).
But they all agree on certain things: race-mixing is good, Jews are
infallible, multiculturalism is great, non-white immigration is good,
etc. Anything dangerous to the survival of White people, they support,
and there's few, if any, exceptions to that.
**********************************************************
STOP THE HATE - SEPARATE!
**********************************************************
The National Alliance is the foremost separatist
organization for White men and women. Hear the NA's
Internet broadcasts at:
http://www.natall.com
http://www.natvan.com
**********************************************************
FOR THE TRUTH ON THE "HOLOCAUST":
http://www.kaiwan.com/~ihrgreg/ Greg Raven's Website
http://www.webcom/~ezundel/english/welcome.html Zundelsite
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~lpauling/ Student Revisionists
http://www.codoh.com/irving/irving.html David Irving
http://pubweb.acns.nwu.edu/~abutz/ Arthur Butz
http://www.air-photo.com/ Air Photo Evidence (John Ball)
http://www.adam.com.au/~fredadin/adins,html Adelaide Inst.
***********************************************************
Keith Morrison
CENT...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> Herr VanAlstine,Who publishes your history
> books,Simon&Jewster?FYI:Italian units served with distinction in
> Albania,Greece,Yugoslavia and North Africa.I suggest that you
> read:Mussolini's Soldiers by Rex Tyre(Airlife Publishing Ltd.) Some of
> the best Italian units fought alongside Rommel and at Stalingrad.
> Again,don't believe the Allied(read Jewish)propaganda.By the way,what
> does all of your information have to do with the holocaust?(or the price
> of tea in China)Answer me if you dare!Centurio.
Rommel made it perfectly clear that in his view the
Italians would not fight if the Anglo-Americans
invaded Italy or any part of it. (1)
Rommel's feelings about the Italians -- including the
Italians of Mussolini's regime, under whose nominal
direction he had fought in Africa -- were far from tender
at this time, particularly since (after Asche) he had
discovered immense quantitites of Italian military
equipment in store, all dating from the period when
he had been assured by the Commando Supremo that they
had nothing with which to to improve the materiel of
their men in North Africa, that the cupboard was bare.
Rommel had always supposed the Italians unwilling to
take the needs of war seriously, and he supposed so
until the end. (2)
(1) David Fraser. _Knight's Cross: A Life of Field Marshal Erwin
Rommel_ (Fraser Publications Ltd, 1993, ISBN 0 00 215936 8)
p. 436.
(2) Ibid, p. 450.
19 November 1942
Stalingrad has drawn German troops like moths to a candle
while both to their left and to their right are unreliable
allies. (3)
[note: to the north were Rumanians, to the south Italians]
--
Keith Morrison
lone...@nbnet.nb.ca
Keith Morrison
Keith Morrison wrote:
> 19 November 1942
>
> Stalingrad has drawn German troops like moths to a candle
> while both to their left and to their right are unreliable
> allies. (3)
>
> [note: to the north were Rumanians, to the south Italians]
Sorry, forgot the footnote. _The World Almanac Book of World War II_,
Bison Books Ltd, 1981, ISBN 0 911818 19 7
--
Keith Morrison
lone...@nbnet.nb.ca
Mark Van Alstine
> CENT...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I cannot stress this enough,without Jewish control of the media,the
> > > > > holocaust myth could never have taken off.This is the same type of
> > > > > propaganda that stated the Italians weren't good fighters in
W.W.2(there
> > > > > are two British battleships that sit at the bottom of Alexandria
harbor
> > > > > that indicate otherwise).
> > > >
> > > > There were 3 battleships on the floor of Taranto harbour. Your point?
> > >
> > > Keith,
> > >
> > > Aren't you imitating the media. Who is controlling you?
> > >
> > >Dear Keith,That's funny,I don't look Jewish!Any connection between me & the
> > >media is purely coincidental.Your'e Nizkook tricks of accusing the accuser
> > >just won't work here.Better luck next time!
>
> If someone can parse any sense out of this I would be forever
> in your debt. I can't seem to find any place where I accused
> anyone of anything.
Translation: Whaaaaaa! It's 'dem JOOOOOOOOS again!
Keith Morrison
Mark Van Alstine wrote:
> > > > Keith,
> > > >
> > > > Aren't you imitating the media. Who is controlling you?
> > > >
> > > >Dear Keith,That's funny,I don't look Jewish!Any connection between me & the
> > > >media is purely coincidental.Your'e Nizkook tricks of accusing the accuser
> > > >just won't work here.Better luck next time!
> >
> > If someone can parse any sense out of this I would be forever
> > in your debt. I can't seem to find any place where I accused
> > anyone of anything.
>
> Translation: Whaaaaaa! It's 'dem JOOOOOOOOS again!
Oh, much obliged.
--
Keith Morrison
lone...@nbnet.nb.ca
Roger Hughes
In message <mvanalst-240...@rbi141.rbi.com> - mvan...@rbi.com
(Mark Van Alstine)Sat, 24 May 1997 07:32:48 -0700 writes:
:>Translation: Whaaaaaa! It's 'dem JOOOOOOOOS again!
Ok folks, again we have yet another Nizkook Propaganda Technique (NPT)
in use to obsfucate the obvious preponderance of Jews in controlling
media positions. Notice that in NPT #29 they avoided the issue by
falsely claiming that The National Alliance
thought our fellow Whites stupid. Nonetheless, the senseless jibbering
that was evident in NPT #29 is still present, but now we hear them
babbling about "'dem JOOOOOOOOS". However, nowhere in their response do
we see any rational discussion of the Jew/media issue, nor any
substantive refutation.
Again, whenever you notice a NPT being used, take it a sure indication
that the Nizkooks cannot refute and can only hope to avoid, and in
effect are admitting defeat.
Ken McVay
In article <5m8545$i...@crack.usaor.net>, ipm@?usaor.net? (William
"Call me Roger Hughes or Ian McKinney" Scott) wrote:
>In message <mvanalst-240...@rbi141.rbi.com> - mvan...@rbi.com
>(Mark Van Alstine)Sat, 24 May 1997 07:32:48 -0700 writes:
>:>Translation: Whaaaaaa! It's 'dem JOOOOOOOOS again!
>Ok folks, again we have yet another Nizkook Propaganda Technique (NPT)
>in use to obsfucate the obvious preponderance of Jews in controlling
>media positions. Notice that in NPT #29 they avoided the issue by
Is the National Alliance now admitting they haven't a clue how many
media outlets are controlled by Jews? The change in wording would
suggest that Ian Roger William Hughes McKinney Scott has changed
horses in mid-stream - i.e. he's run away without addressing the
issue again... gee, that's a shocker.
>falsely claiming that The National Alliance
>thought our fellow Whites stupid. Nonetheless, the senseless jibbering
Flasely claiming? Let's see if we have the National Alliance agitprop
down correctly:
Wascally Joos "control" the media and "rule America." (Source,
National Alliance agitprop "Who Rules America?")
Through control of the media, Wascally Joos hoodwink white folks into
believing a bunch of incorrect thought.
Ergo, white folks, according to the National Alliance, are too damned
STOOPID to decide the truth of things for themselves. No escaping
that conclusion, Willie, nor is there any escape from the second set
of "facts" from the National Alliance:
Wascally Joos "rule America."
[Therefore] White folks are incapable of ruling themselves - i.e.
they are STOOPID.
No WONDER National Alliance members think it's ok to steal money from
white folks, by both counterfeiting it and outright armed robbery.
They think we're all STOOPID, Ian Roger Willie HGughes McKinney Scott
notwithstanding.
>that was evident in NPT #29 is still present, but now we hear them
>babbling about "'dem JOOOOOOOOS". However, nowhere in their response do
>we see any rational discussion of the Jew/media issue, nor any
>substantive refutation.
Let's discuss this "Jew/media issue," Mr. McKinney Hughes Scott. I'll
start, you respond. Here's my contribution:
How many newspaper publishers are there in North America?
How many are privately held?
How many of those are held by Jewish investors?
How many are traded on the exchange?
How many are held by controlling Jewish investors?
How large is their market share?
How many magazine publishers are there in North America?
How many are privately held?
How many of those are held by Jewish investors?
How many are traded on the exchange?
How many are held by controlling Jewish investors?
How large is their market share?
How many cable broadcasters are there in North America?
How many are privately held?
How many of those are held by Jewish investors?
How many are traded on the exchange?
How many are held by controlling Jewish investors?
How large is their market share?
How many radio broadcasters are there in North America?
How many are privately held?
How many of those are held by Jewish investors?
How many are traded on the exchange?
How many are held by controlling Jewish investors?
How large is their market share?
How many television broadcasters are there in North America?
How many are privately held?
How many of those are held by Jewish investors?
How many are traded on the exchange?
How many are held by controlling Jewish investors?
How large is their market share?
>Again, whenever you notice a NPT being used, take it a sure indication
>that the Nizkooks cannot refute and can only hope to avoid, and in
>effect are admitting defeat.
Well, Mr. Willie Scott Ian McKinney Roger Hughes, it's your turn to
respond to discussing this "Jew/media issue," so don't waste any time
dealing with the questions above... you've alreazdy had about a year
to get the National Alliance er "research center" to look up the
answers for you, so we know you'll get right at it and prove you know
what the heck you're talking about, ok?
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"I can and will come in under another name that is not killfiled. You
folks have proven yourselves so freaking dumb that I can do anything I
want to show what idiots you are." (Matt Giwer, June 13, 1996)
Brian Smith
kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Ken McVay) wrote:
>Wascally Joos "control" the media and "rule America." (Source,
>National Alliance agitprop "Who Rules America?")
>Through control of the media, Wascally Joos hoodwink white folks into
>believing a bunch of incorrect thought.
Here's Ken McVay, as always, too dense to realize that trying to
refute Jewish media control is the equivalent of claiming the earth
doesn't revolve around the sun. In his usual lame attempts at
obfuscation, with phrases like "dem' wascally Joos," he ends up just
further highlighting the fact that the Jews DO control the media.
For the facts and names of which Jews own and control which media
companies, newspapers, and publishing houses:
http://www.natall.com/WHORULES/WHORULES.HTML
And once again, Ken thanks for giving me another opportunity to cite
the _Who Rules America_ URL on Jewish media control! You always
provide a good reminder from time to time. Love ya buddy!
http://www.kaiwan.com/~ihrgreg/ Greg Raven's Website
http://www.webcom.com/~ezundel/english/welcome.html Zundelsite
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~lpauling/ Student Revisionist Resource Site
http://www.webcom.com/ezundel/english/LEUCHTER/leuchtertoc.html
http://www.codoh.com/irving/irving.html David Irving
http://www.codoh.com/ Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust
http://pubweb.acns.nwu.edu/~abutz/ Arthur R. Butz
http://www.air-photo.com/ Air Photo Evidence (John Ball)
http://www.adam.com.au/~fredadin/adins.html Adelaide Institute
http://www.codoh.com/rudolf/rudreport/rudreport.html
Brian Smith
http://www.natall.com
"A civilization which tolerates the existence of Kaplan and his filthy
business should be burned to the ground." I said. "We should make
a bonfire of the whole thing and then start over fresh "
_The Turner Diaries_. p. 85
>-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
\|/ Towards a New Consciousness. \|/
| A New Future. |
A New People.
>.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
CENT...@ix.netcom.com
In article <33872D...@nbnet.nb.ca>,
lone...@nbnet.nb.ca wrote:
>
> Stalingrad has drawn German troops like moths to a candle
> while both to their left and to their right are unreliable
> allies. (3)
>
> [note: to the north were Rumanians, to the south Italians]
>
> Keith Morrison> lone...@nbnet.nbubsc
>Keith,Again,I must ask you to check your sources,if your publisher subscribes
>to the Holohoax theory(as many do considering they are controlled by Jews)
>then your information is faulty.You see,they would never allow anything
>positive to be printed about Germany or her allies.(which is why David Irvi
>-ng is having such a hard time finding a U.S.publisher for his book about
>Joseph Goebbels)What are the Jews afraid of,the truth?Germany never got to
>write the terms of history.The Axis powers were defeated by sheer numbers
>while holding off the communist Jews/Democrats in order that the world will
>be a better place.(Look around!It doesn't look all that great to me)
> http://www.natvan.com http://www.natall.com
John Morris
In <5m8knh$7s2$1...@news01a.micron.net>, sbr...@micron.net (Brian Smith)
wrote:
>John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) wrote:
>
>>In <33868A...@top.monad.net>, rbdwsn <rbd...@top.monad.net> wrote:
[snip]
>>>The stench is getting bad. To clear the air visit the National Alliance
>>>Website:
>>>http://www.natvan.com
>>The website for people who believe shit smells sweet and that Shinola
>>comes out of the back end of a dog.
>Whew, John! And what a devastating reply. I think you and Van
>Alstink must in competition for who can post the most scatological
>posts.
I hate explaining jokes. Sorry you didn't get it.
John Morris
In <5m8n8e$8ng$1...@news01a.micron.net>, sbr...@micron.net (Brian Smith)
wrote:
[snip]
>Here's Ken McVay, as always, too dense to realize that trying to
>refute Jewish media control is the equivalent of claiming the earth
>doesn't revolve around the sun. In his usual lame attempts at
>obfuscation, with phrases like "dem' wascally Joos," he ends up just
>further highlighting the fact that the Jews DO control the media.
>For the facts and names of which Jews own and control which media
>companies, newspapers, and publishing houses:
>http://www.natall.com/WHORULES/WHORULES.HTML
>And once again, Ken thanks for giving me another opportunity to cite
>the _Who Rules America_ URL on Jewish media control! You always
>provide a good reminder from time to time. Love ya buddy!
Assertion is just fine, but I note that you did not answer a single
question which would make the claims in WHORULES.HTML statsistically
valid.
You may not know it, but just listing the names of Jews prominent in
the media does not prove control or that control impacts on editorial
content.
Sorry, but WHORULES.HTML is propaganda, not a verifiable study.
Alex Vange
John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) wrote:
>You may not know it, but just listing the names of Jews prominent in
>the media does not prove control or that control impacts on editorial
>content.
>
>Sorry, but WHORULES.HTML is propaganda, not a verifiable study.
>
What would the media be like if the Jews did have a large impact on
it? There would be many movies about the "holocaust" and how evil they
say the nazis were. There would be many movies that show Blacks and
Indians or any other non-Whites as superior noblemen who are oppressed by
evil White people. Every other race and culture would be glorified, but
only bad things would be said about White civilization. Except of course
for the Arabs. If Jews controlled the media, Arabs would be depicted as
terrorists. There would be an attack against traditional Christanity.
There would be propaganda in favor of homosexual perversion. The news
would feature stories about women in the military be descriminated
against, but of course there would be no debate over whether women should
be soldiers in the first place. If we see that the media is leftist and
against White Christain civilization then that is evidence in favor of
the belief that the media is controlled by Jews.
Mike Curtis
Alex Vange <va...@mail.cdmnet.com> wrote:
>John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) wrote:
>
>>You may not know it, but just listing the names of Jews prominent in
>>the media does not prove control or that control impacts on editorial
>>content.
>>
>>Sorry, but WHORULES.HTML is propaganda, not a verifiable study.
>>
Here's the slipperly slope argument based on a straw man argument. All
of it fiction and none of it worth commenting on.
> What would the media be like if the Jews did have a large impact on
>it? There would be many movies about the "holocaust" and how evil they
>say the nazis were. There would be many movies that show Blacks and
>Indians or any other non-Whites as superior noblemen who are oppressed by
>evil White people. Every other race and culture would be glorified, but
>only bad things would be said about White civilization. Except of course
>for the Arabs. If Jews controlled the media, Arabs would be depicted as
>terrorists. There would be an attack against traditional Christanity.
>There would be propaganda in favor of homosexual perversion. The news
>would feature stories about women in the military be descriminated
>against, but of course there would be no debate over whether women should
>be soldiers in the first place. If we see that the media is leftist and
>against White Christain civilization then that is evidence in favor of
>the belief that the media is controlled by Jews.
>
Mike Curtis
E-mail mcu...@inetport.com
Nizkor Web: http://www.nizkor.org/
Laura Finsten
On 24 May 1997, Roger Hughes wrote:
[...]
> But they all agree on certain things: race-mixing is good, Jews are
> infallible, multiculturalism is great, non-white immigration is good,
> etc. Anything dangerous to the survival of White people, they support,
> and there's few, if any, exceptions to that.
Uh Rog? I don't know where you've been, but it isn't just (or all) Jews
who think that people should love the people they love, irrespective of
religion, ethnicity, whatever. That immigration policies should not be
based on "race". You folks are about the only wingnuts out there who
think your "survival" is threatened by giving the same rights to all the
people of the country, many of whose ancestors have been here for
centuries. Get a life.
Roger Hughes
In message <33900960...@news.srv.ualberta.ca> -
John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) writes:
:>
:>In <5m8n8e$8ng$1...@news01a.micron.net>, sbr...@micron.net (Brian Smith)
:>wrote:
:>
:>[snip]
:>
:>>Here's Ken McVay, as always, too dense to realize that trying to
:>>refute Jewish media control is the equivalent of claiming the earth
:>>doesn't revolve around the sun. In his usual lame attempts at
:>>obfuscation, with phrases like "dem' wascally Joos," he ends up just
:>>further highlighting the fact that the Jews DO control the media.
:>
:>>For the facts and names of which Jews own and control which media
:>>companies, newspapers, and publishing houses:
:>
:>>http://www.natall.com/WHORULES/WHORULES.HTML
:>
:>>And once again, Ken thanks for giving me another opportunity to cite
:>>the _Who Rules America_ URL on Jewish media control! You always
:>>provide a good reminder from time to time. Love ya buddy!
:>
:>Assertion is just fine, but I note that you did not answer a single
:>question which would make the claims in WHORULES.HTML statsistically
:>valid.
:>You may not know it, but just listing the names of Jews prominent in
:>the media does not prove control or that control impacts on editorial
:>content.
:>
:>Sorry, but WHORULES.HTML is propaganda, not a verifiable study.
Like hell! What more do you need? Even the Jews admit to controlling
Hollywood, and the information media is under only slightly less Jewish
control. Now you can deny it all you want and try to be cute and talk
about "dem JOOOOOOOS" and that other crap about how the National
Alliance thinks White people are stupid, but it's all lies, and all
nonsense. And you know it is! The Jews have a strangle-hold on the
media. there's no denying it.
**********************************************************
STOP THE HATE - SEPARATE!
**********************************************************
The National Alliance is the foremost separatist
organization for White men and women. Hear the NA's
Internet broadcasts at:
http://www.natall.com
http://www.natvan.com
**********************************************************
FOR THE TRUTH ON THE "HOLOCAUST":
http://www.kaiwan.com/~ihrgreg/ Greg Raven's Website
http://www.webcom/~ezundel/english/welcome.html Zundelsite
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~lpauling/ Student Revisionists
http://www.codoh.com/irving/irving.html David Irving
http://pubweb.acns.nwu.edu/~abutz/ Arthur Butz
http://www.air-photo.com/ Air Photo Evidence (John Ball)
http://www.adam.com.au/~fredadin/adins,html Adelaide Inst.
***********************************************************
Roger Hughes
In message <3388ff23...@news.srv.ualberta.ca> -
John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) writes:
:>
:>>Whew, John! And what a devastating reply. I think you and Van
:>>Alstink must in competition for who can post the most scatological
:>>posts.
:>
:>I hate explaining jokes. Sorry you didn't get it.
I'm glad we didn't get it.
John Morris
In <5mapu7$d...@crack.usaor.net>, ipm@?usaor.net? (Roger Hughes) wrote:
>In message <33900960...@news.srv.ualberta.ca> -
>John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) writes:
>:>
>:>In <5m8n8e$8ng$1...@news01a.micron.net>, sbr...@micron.net (Brian Smith)
>:>wrote:
>:>
>:>[snip]
>:>
>:>>Here's Ken McVay, as always, too dense to realize that trying to
>:>>refute Jewish media control is the equivalent of claiming the earth
>:>>doesn't revolve around the sun. In his usual lame attempts at
>:>>obfuscation, with phrases like "dem' wascally Joos," he ends up just
>:>>further highlighting the fact that the Jews DO control the media.
>:>
>:>>For the facts and names of which Jews own and control which media
>:>>companies, newspapers, and publishing houses:
>:>
>:>>http://www.natall.com/WHORULES/WHORULES.HTML
>:>
>:>>And once again, Ken thanks for giving me another opportunity to cite
>:>>the _Who Rules America_ URL on Jewish media control! You always
>:>>provide a good reminder from time to time. Love ya buddy!
>:>Assertion is just fine, but I note that you did not answer a single
>:>question which would make the claims in WHORULES.HTML statsistically
>:>valid.
>:>You may not know it, but just listing the names of Jews prominent in
>:>the media does not prove control or that control impacts on editorial
>:>content.
>:>Sorry, but WHORULES.HTML is propaganda, not a verifiable study.
>Like hell! What more do you need?
Something a little more nuanced than a list of names. Something like a
comparative list of executives, CEOs, and large shareholders who are
both Jewish and non-Jewish (and non-American considering the SONY
takeover of Columbia). Something that might speak to the interlocking
structures of large corporations and how ownership and/or power are
distributed among them. And precise information that would demonstrate
whether corporately-controlled media define or follow US foreign
policy. In regards to the last point, we don't really know from you
whether we are looking at a causal relationship or a coincidence.
Just saying, "Here's a list of Jews, and ain't that terrible" does not
hit the mark.
> Even the Jews admit to controlling
>Hollywood, and the information media is under only slightly less Jewish
>control.
Jews are probably overrepresented in the media, and there are
historical reasons for that, most notably that Jews were discriminated
against in many professions when the mass media were being invented.
Hardly their fault if they went on to invent new professions like
Broadway producer or Hollywood mogul.
> Now you can deny it all you want and try to be cute and talk
>about "dem JOOOOOOOS" and that other crap about how the National
>Alliance thinks White people are stupid, but it's all lies, and all
>nonsense. And you know it is! The Jews have a strangle-hold on the
>media. there's no denying it.
Sorry, but I don't see how your use of inflammatory language is proof
of your claims. I've told you why I think WHORULES is inadequate. You
show me why it is.
Keith Morrison
CENT...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >Keith,Again,I must ask you to check your sources,if your publisher subscribes
> >to the Holohoax theory(as many do considering they are controlled by Jews)
> >then your information is faulty.You see,they would never allow anything
> >positive to be printed about Germany or her allies.(which is why David Irvi
> >-ng is having such a hard time finding a U.S.publisher for his book about
> >Joseph Goebbels)What are the Jews afraid of,the truth?Germany never got to
> >write the terms of history.The Axis powers were defeated by sheer numbers
> >while holding off the communist Jews/Democrats in order that the world will
> >be a better place.(Look around!It doesn't look all that great to me)
Before you make an even greater fool of yourself perhaps you might care
to
read a another selection from the book I quoted:
In any numbering of the great captains of history, the
name of Erwin Rommel must stand in the first rank.
(_Knight's Cross_)
Oh yeah, they were really anti-German there.
As for the Almanac all it is is a day-to-day account of the war bereft
of editorial content. Of are you suggesting that those nasty Jooos
went back in their time machine and changed history the way they
wanted?
Do grow up. You're pathetic.
--
Keith Morrison
lone...@nbnet.nb.ca
FELIX
Laura Finsten wrote:
>
> That immigration policies should not be
> based on "race". You folks are about the only wingnuts out there who
> think your "survival" is threatened by giving the same rights to all the
> people of the country, many of whose ancestors have been here for
> centuries.
What gibberish is this? The United States immigration policies were and
ARE based on race. Since the anti-white Emmanuel Cellar law was passed
in the sixties, the quota is determined by the relative population of
the country of emigration as a percentage of world population.
--
FELIX
http://www.csra.net/lrand
http://www.first-amendment.com/ygg
http://www.natvan.com
Jenn Starkman
In article <33868A...@top.monad.net>, rbdwsn <rbd...@top.monad.net> wrote:
>MGirsch251 wrote:
>> Interesting point. Except Time-Warner is really run by Ted Turner. Last
>> time I looked, he was NOT a Jew. And DIsney himself was not a Jew, as a
>> matter of fact, he was quite the anti semite, so it would seem that
>> control of Disney would shift from person to person, not from Jew to Jew.
>
>Is a Jewish takeover a normal transfer of control? Yes, when Jewish
>revenge is involved.
Are you implying that the transfer of control of Disney to Eisner was some
sort of hostile takeover, or anything other than a friendly transfer from one
person to another? If so, please provide evidence of your assertions.
Are you implying that "revenge" was somehow involved? If so, please provide
evidence of your assertion.
Jenn
******
Note: I am no longer using my freenet or Netcom e-mail accounts
in order to protect those servers from the mailbombing which I
have been subjected to recently. Anybody who would like to contact
me via e-mail should leave a message on alt.skinheads to that effect,
and I will be in touch with you.
Jenn Starkman
In article <5m5lqh$o...@crack.usaor.net>, ipm@?usaor.net? (Roger Hughes) wrote:
>In message <19970523192...@ladder01.news.aol.com> -
>mgirs...@aol.com (MGirsch251) writes:
>:>
>:>HM Murdock wrote:
>:>
>:>
>:>>It does not however, address the fact that Jews are represented in the
>:>>mass media in numbers that are much greater than their percentage of the
>:>>general population.
>:>
>:>This is probably true. Doesn't mean it's a "Jewish" conspiracy though,
>:>unless you are paranoid.
>
>No matter how one looks at it, there's something unhealthy about 75% of
>the major media being in the hands of a people who are a mere 2.5% of
>the population.
And what exactly is that "something unhealthy"? The sign of a strong,
culturally-encouraged work ethic?
>I don't think its even debatable that they might be a little biased for their
>side.
What exactly is "their side"? Do you mean to say that all Jews have the same
opinions? That all Jews, no matter how they were raised--from the most
secular to the most religious, from the various ethnicities within the
religion, etc.--all hold exactly the same views?
>:>>For example, take Michael Eisner, Gerald Levin, and Sumner Redstone.
>:>
>:>WOW!!! THREE WHOLE NAMES!!! IT MUST BE A CONSPIRACY!!!
>
>Silly boy! You would choke on all the Jewish names prominant in the
>media. If we threw in all the Jewish script writers and lesser figures,
>you'd need oxygen and CPR.
How many more Jewish people are prominent in the media than "white" people?
How many more Jewish script writers and "lesser figures" are there than
"white" people?
>:>>Are they, or are they not the CEO's of ABC-Disney,
>:>Time-Life-Warner-Turner?
>:>
>:>Interesting point. Except Time-Warner is really run by Ted Turner. Last
>:>time I looked, he was NOT a Jew.
>
>Turner works for Eisner. You don't know what you're talking about.
Of COURSE! Turner MUST work for Eisner...after all, Eisner is the JOOOOOOOO.
Right?
>:>And DIsney himself was not a Jew, as a
>:>matter of fact, he was quite the anti semite, so it would seem that
>:>control of Disney would shift from person to person, not from Jew to Jew.
>
>Whatever logic there is in this statement must exist in another
>dimension, since I can't find it. Has this person every heard of a
>company being sold? Yes, such things do occur. Disney's son sold the
>company to Eisner. Is that hard to understand?
To us, no. But perhaps you ought to be focusing your *own* energies on the
"race traitor" who is Disney's son, who sold out his father's hard-earned
business empire to a JOOOOOOO, rather than on Eisner, who was simply bright
enough to take that opportunity when it was given to him.
>[snipped more idiocy]
>
>:>>Aren't the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and the New York
>:>published
>:>>by Jews?
>:>
>:>WOW! THREE NEWSPAPERS!!! MUST BE A CONSPIRACY!!
>
>:>Ever heard of Rupert Murdoch? He owns a FEW newspapers, and the FOX
>:>network.
>
>Yes. I've heard of him.
How about Conrad Black, here in Canada, who controls not 2 or 3, but just
about ALL of the major newspapers in this country...and is "white"?
>Now, this guy really thinks he's made a big point by mentioning some
>prominant Gentile amongst a whole gang of Jews, and trying to say that
>proves there's no Jewish control. Absolutely amazing!
Alright, then, how many more Jews than "white" people are there in each of the
categories you've listed above?
>Of course, it never once dawns on him that Gentiles out-number Jews by 40 to
>1.
Says a lot about both the Jewish work ethic, and the "white" people's
supposed "superiority" but apparent lack of ability when it comes to
achieving such high goals, doesn't it?
>Dolly Parton and Robert Mitchem said essentially the same thing as
>Brando - namely that Jews control Hollywood. Look, you're beating a dead
>horse; even the Jews admit it.
Are you implying that Dolly Parton is Jewish?
Michael
On Tue, 27 May 97 05:27:57 GMT, bb...@freenet.carleton.ca (Jenn
Starkman) wrote:
<everything snipped>
All you have to do to make your point, Jenn (man or woman?), is to go
to:
"http://www.natvan.com/whorules/whorules.html" and point by point
refute the facts in that article.
natio...@juno.com
Michael
"http://www.natall.com"
National Vanguard Books
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946
"No man has come to true greatness who has not felt
in some degree that his life belongs to his race."
----Phillips Brooks
John Morris
>Laura Finsten wrote:
>> That immigration policies should not be
>> based on "race". You folks are about the only wingnuts out there who
>> think your "survival" is threatened by giving the same rights to all the
>> people of the country, many of whose ancestors have been here for
>> centuries.
>What gibberish is this? The United States immigration policies were and
>ARE based on race. Since the anti-white Emmanuel Cellar law was passed
>in the sixties, the quota is determined by the relative population of
>the country of emigration as a percentage of world population.
Sounds to me like you just said that US immigration laws are based on
nationality, not race. Or do you think "country" means "race" as you
would define race?
rsam...@hotmail.com
Laura Finsten wrote:
>
> On 24 May 1997, Roger Hughes wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > But they all agree on certain things: race-mixing is good, Jews are
> > infallible, multiculturalism is great, non-white immigration is good,
> > etc. Anything dangerous to the survival of White people, they support,
> > and there's few, if any, exceptions to that.
>
> "race" how else could we get Russian mafioso imported? You folks are about the only > goyim out there who are still against out propaganda and lies. I, personally, think
> your "survival" is threatened by giving the same rights to all the people of the
There, that's better! Make's more sense now.
Chuck Ferree
Chuck Ferree wrote:
All these paranoid kooks worried sick about whether or not there might
by Jewish influence over the mass media. I'm Catholic, voted
conservative all my life until Reagan's second term, at which time I
figured out what a dumb shit he and all those others were, voted
Democrat ever since, and wonder if it makes any difference. But about
the Jewish control, it doesn't bother me, the media sucks no matter
who owns it and runs it. Always has long before the Jews owned
everything in the world. (take my word, they don't really don't) Go
to any library, look up old newspapers, before WW-I, before the
depression, before the Indian wars, newspapers were worse then than
they are now. TV, is a waste of time, and the TV station owners know
it. The potato heads who stay glued to their TV sets, don't care about
who owns that crap, it's fun for them, and they'd watch the blank
screen if they had to. So bottom line, business is business, the media
is business, all professional sports are business, let's hear some
bitching about all the tax payers money used in America to build
multi-million dollar stadiums for the professional sports games. What
this is all about, is sickos, who hate anything Jewish, which makes
them bigots, and racists, which makes them ignorant dipsticks.
The entire argument about Jewish influence and the media, is just a
complete crock. IT DON"T MATTER, FOLKS! IT JUST DON'T MATTER!
We have a country here. The United States of American. That's what
matters. It ain't a perfect country, lots of idiots running the
country, but it's still the best country and best system in the world.
Just think: at this very moment, our national leaders...Clinton et al,
have American military stationed in over 1,000 foreign countries.
That's something to worry about.
CENT...@ix.netcom.com
Now that Memorial Day is over,let us have a moment of silence for all
those white men who were lied to by the Jewish controlled
government/media so they could be sent to their deaths in meaningless
wars from the civil war to Desert Storm/Somalia.The controlled media
trumpets these wars in pursuit of the abstract ideal of Zionism and masks
it as making the world "safe for democracy".Those veterans who are lucky
enough to survive,return home and are treated like shit while million
dollar niggers like Tiger Woods and Dennis Rodman are treated like
heroes!Anyone notice anything wrong with this picture?For more truth,see
http://www.natvan.com & http://www.natall.com
Chuck Ferree
Chuck Ferree:
This subject matter is so besides the point, it's pitiful.
IT DOESN'T MATTER. IT'S A BUSINESS, BUSINESS IS BUSINESS!
And further more, The Jewish people do not own the world. Only BIGOTS
believe that nonsense.
Thomas Stedham
Chuck Ferree <chu...@rio.com> wrote in article <338ACE...@rio.com>...
> Just think: at this very moment, our national leaders...Clinton et al,
> have American military stationed in over 1,000 foreign countries.
>
> That's something to worry about.
What's to be worried about is what planet you live on.... Please try to
list even half of these "over 1,000 countries" you claim exist on your
planet. Hello!
No doubt there are thousands of jewish "eyewitnesses" who will testify to
that number...
--
Thomas Stedham is tste...@tusc.net
http://www.tusc.net/~tstedham
-----------
"Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of
chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course
others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!"
-Patrick Henry March 23, 1775
--------------
>
The BOK
On Sun, 25 May 1997 18:03:12 GMT, mcu...@inetport.com (Mike Curtis)
wrote:
>Alex Vange <va...@mail.cdmnet.com> wrote:
>
>>John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) wrote:
>>
>>>You may not know it, but just listing the names of Jews prominent in
>>>the media does not prove control or that control impacts on editorial
>>>content.
>>>
>>>Sorry, but WHORULES.HTML is propaganda, not a verifiable study.
>>>
>
>Here's the slipperly slope argument based on a straw man argument. All
>of it fiction and none of it worth commenting on.
>
>Mike Curtis
>E-mail mcu...@inetport.com
>Nizkor Web: http://www.nizkor.org/
Well, it seems they handle this discussion just like they handle the
so-called holocaust, refuse to debate and refuse to revise, even the
most insignificant portion. Becuase?
They are paid agents working for the interests of Israel. They are not
historians and they are not civil rights activists. Revision is part
of the historical process but it is not good for making large amount
of sympathy money.
Best regards,
Vincent
In The American Hebrew of September 10, 1920 we read:
"The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia ... shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical
forces, become a reality all over the world."
http://www.natall.com
http://www.natvan.com
To Subscribe to American Dissident Voices weekly transcripts
(the printed version of our weekly radio program),
mail: adv...@dreamon.com.
HM Murdock
In article <33900960...@news.srv.ualberta.ca>,
John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) wrote:
> >For the facts and names of which Jews own and control which media
> >companies, newspapers, and publishing houses:
>
> >http://www.natall.com/WHORULES/WHORULES.HTML
> You may not know it, but just listing the names of Jews prominent in
> the media does not prove control or that control impacts on editorial
> content.
I see! Michael Eisner is the CEO of ABC-Disney. But he doesn't really
have any say in what his company does.
Nor does Gerald Levin, the CEO of Time-Life-Warner-Turner.
Strange-everywhere I've worked,when the "Big Boss" said "jump" everyone had
to ask "how high?" Maybe Jews really are different! :)
> Sorry, but WHORULES.HTML is propaganda, not a verifiable study.
Sorry, but the internet is not a classroom where you can make such foolish
claims, and than give bad grades to anyone who disagrees.
Even if you are upset by facts which contradict you already preconceived
opinions! Pooka pooka poka!
Regards,
HM
John Morris
In <hmurdock-ya023580...@news.jps.net>,
hmur...@inreach.com (HM Murdock) wrote:
>In article <33900960...@news.srv.ualberta.ca>,
>John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) wrote:
>> >For the facts and names of which Jews own and control which media
>> >companies, newspapers, and publishing houses:
>> >http://www.natall.com/WHORULES/WHORULES.HTML
>> You may not know it, but just listing the names of Jews prominent in
>> the media does not prove control or that control impacts on editorial
>> content.
> I see! Michael Eisner is the CEO of ABC-Disney. But he doesn't really
>have any say in what his company does.
Perhaps Michael Eisner exercises editorial control in the day-to-day
operations of ABC News; perhaps he doesn't. I don't see where this is
proved in the National Alliance's list of Jews in WHORULES.HTML.
>Nor does Gerald Levin, the CEO of Time-Life-Warner-Turner.
Perhaps Gerald Levin exercises editorial control in the day-to-day
operations of Time Magazine; perhaps he doesn't. I don't see where
this is proved in the National Alliance's list of Jews in
WHORULES.HTML.
>Strange-everywhere I've worked,when the "Big Boss" said "jump" everyone had
>to ask "how high?" Maybe Jews really are different! :)
You seem to think so, but you haven't proved it.
When I was a public servant, the Minister of Revenue never came to my
desk to tell me how to order supplies of public forms, and neither did
the Deputy Minister nor any of the hordes of Assistant Deputy
Ministers nor Regional Directors (ain't bureaucracy grand). The only
time I ever spoke to the Office Director was when representing on
employee grievances. Large corporations are no less bureaucratic and
inefficient than governments. It is a question of how much the "Big
Boss" is engaged in defining corporate policy and how much that
corporate policy determines daily practise.
It is just as possible that Jews in charge of large media corporations
are more interested in making money than in setting editorial policy.
A list of Jewish names does not prove the case either way.
>> Sorry, but WHORULES.HTML is propaganda, not a verifiable study.
>Sorry, but the internet is not a classroom where you can make such foolish
>claims, and than give bad grades to anyone who disagrees.
It is the authors of WHORULES.HTML who are making claims. I am asking
that they prove their claims.
>Even if you are upset by facts which contradict you already preconceived
>opinions! Pooka pooka poka!
I am not the one with preconceived notions about the impact of Jewish
over-representation in the ownership of the mass media. I cannot tell
from a list of Jewish names whether Jews are over-represented. I
cannot tell from a list of Jewish names whether Jews exercise
day-to-day editorial control over mass media. I cannot tell from a
list of Jewish names whether their Jewishness is a significant factor
in the exercise of power, or whether it is a more significant factor
than their desire to run a profitable corporation.
I have already posted what *I* think would be necessary to prove your
case. If you disagree, tell me where I am wrong. Explain to me how a
list of Jewish names facilitates a comparison between Jewish and
non-Jewish executives, CEOs, and large shareholders of corporate mass
media. Tell me something that might speak to the interlocking
structures of large corporations and how ownership and/or power are
distributed among them. Give me precise information that would
demonstrate whether corporately-controlled media define or follow US
foreign policy. In regards to the last point, we don't really know
from you whether we are looking at a causal relationship or a
coincidence.
Until the National Alliance proves it case WHORULES.HTML is
anti-Jewish propaganda, not a verifiable study.
Snarling at my didacticism does not prove your case.
Roger Hughes
In message <5mdrvv$7...@freenet-news.carleton.ca> -
bb...@freenet.carleton.ca (Jenn Starkman) writes:
:>>Turner works for Eisner. You don't know what you're talking about.
:>
:>Of COURSE! Turner MUST work for Eisner...after all, Eisner is the JOOOOOOOO.
:>Right?
Wrong. Disney bought CNN. In case you have trouble understanding such a
relationship, it means that Eisner is Turner's boss.
:>Says a lot about both the Jewish work ethic, and the "white" people's
:>supposed "superiority" but apparent lack of ability when it comes to
:>achieving such high goals, doesn't it?
No, it says a lot about how Jews are absolutely fanatical when it comes
to controlling other people's channels of information. As amazing as it
might seem there are people who actually see no problem with Jews
controlling virtually all major information outlets. These people are
the true brain-dead and, obviously, the exact kind of persons the Jews
love most.
:>>Dolly Parton and Robert Mitchem said essentially the same thing as
:>>Brando - namely that Jews control Hollywood. Look, you're beating a dead
:>>horse; even the Jews admit it.
:>
:>Are you implying that Dolly Parton is Jewish?
Hell no! She was attacked by the ADL for making some comments about
Hollywood being Jewish-controlled.
**********************************************************
STOP THE HATE - SEPARATE!
**********************************************************
The National Alliance is the foremost separatist
organization for White men and women. Hear the NA's
Internet broadcasts at:
http://www.natall.com
http://www.natvan.com
**********************************************************
Abusive emails will be posted to the Usenet and ridiculed.
Leo Walsh
>>It does not however, address the fact that Jews are represented in the
>mass
>>media in numbers that are much greater than their percentage of the
>general
>>population.
>
>This is probably true. Doesn't mean it's a "Jewish" conspiracy though,
>unless you are paranoid.
Jews control (its difficult to quantify precisely, of course) the
majority of the U.S. media. That is a wee bit much to be mere
"coincidence." Perhaps you subscribe to the accidental theory of history,
ie. that all unusual events are just "coincidences." I prefer the more
logical theory of history, often derided as the "conspiratorial theory,"
that things often, though not always, happen because people make
decisions and take actions which lead to various intentional events.
If the Jews, less than 3% of the U.S. population, dominate ABC, CBS, NBC,
Viacom, Time/Warner, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The
Washington Post, The Boston Globe, Time, Newsweek, U.S. News & World
Report, The Village Voice and VERY MANY OTHER media outlets, and they do,
that is simply too great a disparity to constitute a mere coincidence.
Call it a conspiracy or use less inflammatory language such as collusion,
but its all the same: The Jews are a foreign presence in our nation that
define what we think and feel and control our government through the
media. This state of affairs must end. Either we surivive or they do.
>As far as gun control, well, I know a lot of Jews who own guns, many
are
>members of the NRA.
Perhaps, but the Judeo-Bolshevist media NEVER gives the pro-Second
Amendment perspective. The dominant media ALWAYS portrays pro-gun
Americans in general and the NRA in specific as a bunch of stupid, inbred,
redneck, dangerous, psycho-sexually deranged "gun nuts." And you damn
well know it!
>>Years ago, it was decided that vital indistries such as rail
>transportation
>>and oil should not be controlled by monopolies.
>
>>Maybe we should apply that idea to the means of mass communication.
>
>We have moron. READ these newspapers once in a while. I believe if
you
>approach them with an open mind you will see how different their
editorial
>opinions are. SOme are conservative (NY Post, Wall St Journal) some
are
>liberal (NY Times, Washington Post).
The Wall Street Journal is NOT conservative. I know because we get it at
work and I read the editorial page regularly. Its rather moderate with a
bit of a libertarian twist. It, like ALL major U.S. newspapers, never
says anything that directly challenges the Judeo-Bolshevist establishment
in this nation. For all intents and purposes, there are only a handful
of semi-major papers that aren't on the left, such as the Orange County
Register and the Manchester Union-Leader. These papers are generally
portrayed as targeted towards "right-wing kooks" by your controlled media.
HTTP://WWW.NATVAN.COM
-
LEO WALSH GEQ...@prodigy.com
"Rebellion under Tyranny is Obedience before God."
Leo Walsh
The following are some facts that should illustrate to any open-minded
person the reality of control of our media by organized Jewry.
The most obvious place to begin with would be the "Big Three" television
networks. These are no longer independent entities. When they were, all
three were headed by Jews from their inception. At ABC it was LEONARD
GOLDENSON (JEW), at CBS it was WILLIAM PALEY (JEW) and LAURENCE
TISCH (JEW) and at NBC it was DAVID SARNOFF (JEW) and then son ROBERT
SARNOFF (JEW).
ABC is now a part of the world's largest media conglomerate, Disney, with
total annual sales of over 16.5 billion dollars. Disney's CEO is MICHAEL
EISNER (JEW). Disney includes Walt Disney Television,
Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television, the Disney Channel, five
world-renowned theme parks and two home video production companies. It
also includes Miramax Films, which is managed by the WEINSTEIN BROTHERS
(JEWS). The Disney Pictures Group, headed by JOE ROTH (JEW), includes
Touchstone Pictures and Hollywood Pictures. Disney owns ABC through its
acquisition of Capital Cities. ABC has 10 television station in such
major markets as New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia and Houston.
It also has 225 television network affiliates and is part owner of
several
European television production companies. ABC has a cable subsidiary
which owns ESPN, CEO of which is STEVEN BORNSTEIN (JEW), and owns
controlling shares in Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment
Network. ABC Radio Network owns 11 AM stations and 10 FM stations in
cities like New York, Los Angeles and Washington plus over 3400 network
affiliates. Capital Cities also owns 7 daily newspapers, Womens' Wear
Daily, Chilton Publishing and the Diversified Publishing Group.
The second largest media conglomerate on Earth is Time Warner, the
chairman of the board and CEO of which is GERALD M. LEVIN (JEW). It owns
HBO, world's largest pay cable network, as well as Warner Music, the
largest musical recording company on Earth (by far) with over 50 labels,
the largest of which is Warner Brothers Records headed up by DANNY
GOLDBERG (JEW). Warner Music's video production company is headed by
STUART HERSCH (JEW). It should be noted that Warner Music's involvement
with Interscope Records was instrumental in the popularization of so-
called "Gangsta Rap," a form of music which explicitly calls for Blacks
to commit acts of murder, rape and other violent crimes against Whites in
general. Warner Brothers Studio is big in the film industry and Warner's
publishing division is the largest magazine publisher in the United
States with Time, Sports Illustrated, People and Fortune. The Editor-in-
Chief of the publishing division is NORMAN PEARLSTINE (JEW). Warner also
owns the "Superstation" WTBS in Atlanta, which is also a national cable
network, as well as the Cable News Network and CNN-Headline News. Warner
also has a 20% share in CBS.
The third largest media conglomerate on Earth is Viacom, which is headed
up by SUMNER REDSTONE, born as MURRAY ROTHSTEIN (JEW). Viacom produces
and distributes television programs to the three major television
networks, owns 12 television stations, and produces feature films through
Paramount, headed by SHERRY LANSING (JEW). Viacom's publishing division
includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster and Pocket Books. They also own
Blockbuster Video with over 4000 stores nationwide. Viacom is the
world's largest provider of cable television programming and owns
Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon and several others. Viacom's fingers are also
into satellite broadcasting, video games and theme parks.
By the time one reaches the fourth largest media conglomerate on Earth,
you actually find one NOT under the direct control of a Jew! Rupert
Murdoch's News Corporation is most famous in America for Fox Television.
Murdoch's television production company and film studio are, however,
managed by
PETER CHERNIN (JEW).
The fifth largest media conglomerate on Earth is the Sony Corporation.
Its U.S. subsidiary is headed up by MICHAEL SCHULOF (JEW). Sony Pictures
is run by ALAN J. LEVINE (JEW).
CBS is headed by DAVID OBER (JEW). NBC's News Division is run by ANDREW
LACK (JEW). The executive producers of NBC's "Today," "NBC Nightly News"
and "Dateline" are, respectively, JEFF ZUCKER (JEW), JEFF GRALNICK (JEW)
and NEAL SHAPIRO (JEW). The ABC news programs "20/20," "Good Morning
America," and "World News Tonight," ("Where More Americans Get Their News
Than From Any Other Source") are produced, respectively, by VICTOR S.
NEUFELD (JEW), BOB REICHBLOOM (JEW) and RICK KAPLAN (JEW).
Perhaps the largest independent television production company in America,
New World Entertainment, is owned by RONALD PERELMAN (JEW). The chairman
of New World's board is BRANDON TARTIKOFF (JEW), the former chief of
NBC's entertainment programming division.
A major up-and-coming company which produces film, television programming,
animation features, and music is Dreamworks SKG, which was founded by
STEVEN SPIELBERG (JEW), JEFFREY KATZENBERG (JEW) and DAVID GEFFEN (JEW).
MCA and Universal Pictures are both owned by EDGAR BRONFMAN JR. (JEW),
who is also PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS.
Five Jewish controlled (owned and/or managed by Jews) movie production
companies, Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount and Universal
accounted for 74% of all box office receipts in 1995.
The New York Times was purchased in 1896 by ADOLPH OCHS (JEW). His great-
grandson ARTHUR OCHS SULZBERGER JR. (JEW) is its current publisher and
CEO. The Executive Editor is MAX FRANKEL (JEW) and the Managing Editor
is JOSEPH LELYVELD (JEW). The SULZBERGER FAMILY
(JEWS) also own 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe, 12
magazines, including McCall's and Family Circle with a circulation of
over 5 million each, 7 television and radio stations, three book
publishing houses and the New York Times News Service, which provides
articles, commentary and photos via wire to 506 newspapers, magazines and
news agencies.
The Washington Post was purchased in 1933 by EUGENE MEYER (JEW). It is
now run by his daughter, KATHERINE MEYER GRAHAM (JEW), the principal
stockholder, and board chairman, as well the sister of BOB GRAHAM (JEW),
a member of the United States Senate and the former governor of the
fourth-most populous state of Florida. Her son, DONALD GRAHAM (JEW), is
the publisher plus the CEO of the Washington Post Company which holds
various newspapers and magazines, particularly Newsweek. In a joint-
venture with the New York Times they publish the International Herald
Tribune, the most widely read English daily on Earth.
The Wall Street Journal is the largest U.S. circulation daily with a 1.8
million circulation on Monday through Friday. Its publisher is PETER R.
KANN (JEW), who is also the CEO and chairman of the board of Dow Jones &
Company Incorporated. Dow Jones publishes 24 other dailies and the
financial tabloid
Barron's.
Advance Publications was founded by the late SAMUEL NEWHOUSE (JEW) and is
today operated by his two sons, SAMUEL NEWHOUSE JR. (JEW) and DAVID
NEWHOUSE (JEW). It owns 26 daily newspapers, including the prominent
Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger and the New
Orleans Times-Picayune. Its owns the nations largest book publisher,
Random House, and its many subsidiaries. It also owns the Sunday
supplement Parade (circulation over 22 million weekly) and two dozen
major magazines, including The New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour,
Vanity Fair, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self, House & Garden and all
other publications of the Conde Nast group. Newhouse Broadcasting owns
12 television stations and 87 cable systems.
MORTIMER B. ZUCKERMAN (JEW) is the editor-in-chief and owner of U.S. News
& World Report. He also owns the Atlantic Monthly and the New York Daily
News.
The depraved Village Voice is owned by LEONARD STERN (JEW).
Three of the top six book publishers are owned by Jews. They are (#1)
Random House, (#3) Simon & Schuster and (#6) Time Warner Trade Group (the
Jewish domination of these three companies was established earlier in
this article). Western Publishing is a much smaller publishing house
that is the
leader in the field of childrens' books, in which it has a majority of
the market. Its CEO is RICHARD SNYDER (JEW), who recently replaced
RICHARD BERNSTEIN (JEW).
I would be remiss in my duties if I did not acknowledge the debt I owe to
the research staff of National Vanguard Books, whose fine article "Who
Rules America" is the basis for this condensation. For a complete
catalog of all National Vanguard Book selections, contact them at P.O.
Box 330, Hillsboro,
West Virginia 24946.
NVB is the publishing arm of the National Alliance, America's, if not the
world's, foremost patriotic organization. They have a website at
HTTP://WWW.NATALL.COM
You can contact them at P.O. Box 90, Hillsboro, West Virgina 24946.
Roger Hughes
In message <3390d751...@news.srv.ualberta.ca> -
John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) writes:
:>I am not the one with preconceived notions about the impact of Jewish
:>over-representation in the ownership of the mass media. I cannot tell
:>from a list of Jewish names whether Jews are over-represented.
What are you, some kind of idiot? Jews are 2.5% of the poulation, but
control 75% of the major media. Not "over-represented"? You've got a lot
of nerve posting absolute shit like that while expecting to be taken
seriously.
:>I
:>cannot tell from a list of Jewish names whether Jews exercise
:>day-to-day editorial control over mass media.
What do you think they do all day? Play tic-tac-to with their secretary?
:>I cannot tell from a
:>list of Jewish names whether their Jewishness is a significant factor
:>in the exercise of power, or whether it is a more significant factor
:>than their desire to run a profitable corporation.
That still doesn't explain why Jews are always over-represented in the
media. Look, we're not talking about them being over-represented in the
clothing business - which they were at one time and probably still are,
since the kind of clothing somebody wears doesn't have any impact on
politics, people's attitudes, and social policy. In other words, I don't
really care if there's a lot of Jews in the garment industry, but I do
care if there are a lot of Jews controlling the media, and how they use
that control.
:>I have already posted what *I* think would be necessary to prove your
:>case. If you disagree, tell me where I am wrong. Explain to me how a
:>list of Jewish names facilitates a comparison between Jewish and
:>non-Jewish executives, CEOs, and large shareholders of corporate mass
:>media.
Easy. Non-Jews constitute 97.5% of the population. So having an
overwhelming majority of Gentiles controlling the media would be
perfectly natural and unremarkable. However, having JEWS in so many
positions of power is very unnatural and very remarkable.
:>Tell me something that might speak to the interlocking
:>structures of large corporations and how ownership and/or power are
:>distributed among them. Give me precise information that would
:>demonstrate whether corporately-controlled media define or follow US
:>foreign policy.
Do you need a roadmap of your house to find the bathroom?
\**********************************************************
Roger Hughes
In message <3390d751...@news.srv.ualberta.ca> -
John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) writes:
:>I have already posted what *I* think would be necessary to prove your
:>case. If you disagree, tell me where I am wrong. Explain to me how a
:>list of Jewish names facilitates a comparison between Jewish and
:>non-Jewish executives, CEOs, and large shareholders of corporate mass
:>structures of large corporations and how ownership and/or power are
:>distributed among them. Give me precise information that would
:>demonstrate whether corporately-controlled media define or follow US
:>from you whether we are looking at a causal relationship or a
:>coincidence.
Here folks is yet another Nizkook propaganda technique, which I've
listed as number 31, and consists of ever increasing requests for more
and increasingly detailed information. First they denied there are a
disproportionate number of Jews in controlling positions in the media.
We provided that information. Then they asked for the companies which
are under Jewish control. We give them the companies. Then they wanted
all the names of the various persons and their respective position. We
give them that. All during this process they deny everything we say,
until we provide the documentation to support our claims, at which time
the Nizkooks begin denying something else. And now they want all kinds
of other information and analysis. Clearly, their hope is that we will
simply get tired of answering their deliberately designed obsfucation
questions and just drop the subject of Jewish media control.
These Nizkooks claim to be only interested in defending the Holocaust,
but have actually revealed themselves as nothing more than yet another
arm of the world-wide Jewish propaganda aparatus; furthering Jewish
disinformation, defending Jewish interests, and attempting to stifle
criticism of Jewish political activities on all fronts. That, folks, to
put it bluntly, is their primary mission and purpose.
John Morris
>In message <3390d751...@news.srv.ualberta.ca> -
>John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) writes:
>:>I am not the one with preconceived notions about the impact of Jewish
>:>over-representation in the ownership of the mass media. I cannot tell
>:>from a list of Jewish names whether Jews are over-represented.
>
>What are you, some kind of idiot? Jews are 2.5% of the poulation, but
>control 75% of the major media. Not "over-represented"? You've got a lot
>of nerve posting absolute shit like that while expecting to be taken
>seriously.
Calling me an idiot does not prove your case any more than providing a
list of Jewish names.
>:>I
>:>cannot tell from a list of Jewish names whether Jews exercise
>:>day-to-day editorial control over mass media.
>What do you think they do all day? Play tic-tac-to with their secretary?
Well, what so they do all day? Your list of names does not tell me.
>:>I cannot tell from a
>:>list of Jewish names whether their Jewishness is a significant factor
>:>in the exercise of power, or whether it is a more significant factor
>:>than their desire to run a profitable corporation.
>That still doesn't explain why Jews are always over-represented in the
>media. Look, we're not talking about them being over-represented in the
>clothing business - which they were at one time and probably still are,
>since the kind of clothing somebody wears doesn't have any impact on
>politics, people's attitudes, and social policy. In other words, I don't
>really care if there's a lot of Jews in the garment industry, but I do
>care if there are a lot of Jews controlling the media, and how they use
>that control.
Saying that Jews are over-represented doesn't say anything about why
that might be significant.
>:>I have already posted what *I* think would be necessary to prove your
>:>case. If you disagree, tell me where I am wrong. Explain to me how a
>:>list of Jewish names facilitates a comparison between Jewish and
>:>non-Jewish executives, CEOs, and large shareholders of corporate mass
>:>media.
>
>Easy. Non-Jews constitute 97.5% of the population. So having an
>overwhelming majority of Gentiles controlling the media would be
>perfectly natural and unremarkable. However, having JEWS in so many
>positions of power is very unnatural and very remarkable.
Saying that Jews are over-represented doesn't say anything about why
that might be significant.
>:>Tell me something that might speak to the interlocking
>:>structures of large corporations and how ownership and/or power are
>:>distributed among them. Give me precise information that would
>:>demonstrate whether corporately-controlled media define or follow US
>:>foreign policy.
>Do you need a roadmap of your house to find the bathroom?
Insulting me doesn't prove your case either.
Roger Hughes
In message <338DD2...@nbnet.nb.ca> - Keith Morrison
<lone...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes:
:>
:>HM Murdock wrote:
:>
:>> I see! Michael Eisner is the CEO of ABC-Disney. But he doesn't really
:>> have any say in what his company does.
:>> Nor does Gerald Levin, the CEO of Time-Life-Warner-Turner.
:>>
:>> Strange-everywhere I've worked,when the "Big Boss" said "jump" everyone had
:>> to ask "how high?" Maybe Jews really are different! :)
:>Lee Iaccoca was CEO of Chrysler. He was dumped.
Big deal! You can't be silly enough to think that while Iaccoca was CEO
there were any Chrysler employees who would deliberately do things which
they knew Iaccoca didn't like. That is, of course, if they wanted to
stay employed.
Nonetheless, I find you response to be pure idiocy, since first you
Nizkooks try and deny Jews are in powerful media positions, and then,
when confronted with facts, you try to say that these CEOs really don't
have any power. What crap!
**********************************************************
STOP THE HATE - SEPARATE!
**********************************************************
The National Alliance is the foremost separatist
organization for White men and women. Hear the NA's
Internet broadcasts at:
http://www.natall.com
http://www.natvan.com
**********************************************************
John Morris
In <5mohjv$29t$4...@news01a.micron.net>, sbr...@micron.net (Brian Smith)
wrote:
>i...@usaor.net (Roger Hughes) wrote:
>>John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) writes:
>>:>I am not the one with preconceived notions about the impact of Jewish
>>:>over-representation in the ownership of the mass media. I cannot tell
>>:>from a list of Jewish names whether Jews are over-represented.
>>What are you, some kind of idiot? Jews are 2.5% of the poulation, but
>>control 75% of the major media. Not "over-represented"? You've got a lot
>>of nerve posting absolute shit like that while expecting to be taken
>>seriously.
>John Morris posts to obfuscate or do "damage control" on inconvenient
>facts about Jews and the holohoax. Even if Jews were in 100% of all
>media positions, Morris would still be claiming "So what. Just
>because Jews own 100% of the media doesn't mean they
>'own' the media, or run it for their own advantage."
Thank you for reposting Roger Hughes' claim that Jews "control 75% of
the major media." The claim, is of course, insupportable without the
comparative evaluation I have been asking for. The document
WHORULES.HTML at the National Alliance website does not make a
statistical comparison between Jewish and non-Jewish wonership and
control of mass media corporations. For all you know, the real level
of control might be 90%. Or it might be 10%. The National Alliance
simply doesn't supply enough information to be able to claim any per
cent.
The document is nothing more than a list of Jewish names and the
companies those names are associated with. If the National Alliance
canot, or will not, produce a statistically meaningful analysis, then
the ordinary observer may dismiss WHORULES.HTML as mere propaganda
meant to inspire hatred of Jews.
> Yet if White
>racialists owned even half the media the Jews own, Morris would have
>his self-righteous panties in a tizzy, sermonizing over "White racism
>in the media!" John Morris is a two-faced scumbag.
Who knows what I would do in that circumstance? But that is not the
circumstance we are faced with. What we are faced with is the National
Alliance's refusal to acknowledge that its list of names is not
statistically valid.
Call me names doesn't change that fact.
Chuck Ferree
Chuck Ferree wrote:
First of all, the "media" of the world is not controlled by any one
religion...Jewish or otherwise. So that fact, makes any post or
statement regarding silly nonsense that Jews control the media,
baloney.
TroyLaws wrote:
>
> Chuck Ferree <chu...@rio.com> wrote:
> >The entire argument about Jewish influence and the media, is just a
> >complete crock. IT DON"T MATTER, FOLKS! IT JUST DON'T MATTER!
>
> Chuck, how do you know that that isn't just what they want
> you to think ?
CHUCK:> How do I know that "WHAT" isn't just what they want me to
think? Who are the they? Jewish business people?
>
> Who benefits, Chuck ?
Benefits from what? If your premise is wrong, which it is IMO, the
question is simply beside the point. It's bigotry, nothing less.
Chuck Ferree
Leo Walsh wrote:
>
> The following are some facts that should illustrate to any open-minded
> person the reality of control of our media by organized Jewry.
ALL BE SIDE THE POINT
*************THIS IS REVELEVANT TO THE HOLOCAUST*******
Debate the Holocaust?
by Dan Johnson
I am a WW2 vet who was in the 102nd Infantry Division which
spear- headed the 9th Army drive across Europe to the Elbe River where
we met the Russians. We liberated a number of the death and work camps
as we went along.
The camps, most of which were small could be drawn on for
"free" labor. Political
prisoners were worked to death and it didn't matter to the
Germans, as there were plenty
more where they came from. The whole idea was to get rid of the
prisoners permanently
and make a gain of free labor in the process. I saw Buchenwald
first hand shortly after it
was liberated.
The ten-man combat team which I was a part of was directly
involved in a place called
Gardelegan. 1016 Jewish prisoners were being burned alive there
in a barn on the edge of
town by the SS troops who held the town. My buddy, Bob Zech,
who spoke fluent
German, perpetrated a ruse on the SS officer in charge by
threatening a tank attack if he and
the other SS troopers who had fallen into the trap did not
surrender within the next twenty
minutes or so. The SS bought it and surrendered. They had
intended to kill us, which
would have been easy and to their advantage because they wanted
to cover what was going
on the edge of town at the time.
An American lieutenant had just been captured by chance as he
and his driver had wandered
into the town from the other direction. They just wouldn't have
surrendered to a private
without the presence of an American officer. After the SS
Colonel surrendered, the barn
where these political prisoners were being roasted to death was
discovered at the edge of
town. The smoke was still rising when I walked in. Curiously,
the arm of one of the
victims was burned badly and smelled like roast turkey to me.
The Division Commander,
General Keating, ordered the towns people to construct a
cemetery and memorial as an
attempt to honor the victims. A small brochure describing this
event was printed and
distributed to members of the 102nd Infantry Division. I still
have mine after 52 years.
Ours and other infantry divisions were not capable of
sustaining a continuous attack. We
just ran out of steam and had to stop to re-group and replenish
lost manpower due to battle
casualties, etc. Another division would "pass" through us to
give us a breather. During one
of these lulls in battle we had an opportunity to go to
Buchenwald which was a major Death
Camp. Our officers winked us out on "special" mission so we
could see what was going
on. We saw the mountains of dead bodies, etc., although it was
not necessarily new to us
as we were directly involved in uncovering this sort of
activity, but on a somewhat smaller
scale.
I just can't conceive of anyone not believing that these things
happened. But I guess time
has a way of altering history. The guys who actually witnessed
these things are fast leaving
the face of the planet. Soon there will be none of us left to
give eyewitness accounts of
what they saw. I salute the thousands and thousands of GIs and
soldiers of other nations
who gave their lives to put an end to this madness. I often
wonder what they would think if
they could awaken to see what I see around me. Would they think
it was worth it?
I certainly would not attempt to debate the reality of those
times. It would be tantamount to
arguing with someone who believed the earth is flat...Where do
you even start to debate
such a premise?
Chuck Ferree
Leo Walsh wrote:
>
> The following are some facts that should illustrate to any open-minded
> person the reality of control of our media by organized Jewry.
ALL BESIDE THE POINT...HAS NO BEARING ON THE HOLOCAUST
DELETED
*******NOW THIS IS FACTUAL INFORMATION WHICH IS RELEVANT**********
Michael
But haven't you heard? Nizkooks say that all of this means nothing.
Brian Smith
i...@usaor.net (Roger Hughes) wrote:
>John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) writes:
>:>I am not the one with preconceived notions about the impact of Jewish
>:>over-representation in the ownership of the mass media. I cannot tell
>:>from a list of Jewish names whether Jews are over-represented.
>What are you, some kind of idiot? Jews are 2.5% of the poulation, but
>control 75% of the major media. Not "over-represented"? You've got a lot
>of nerve posting absolute shit like that while expecting to be taken
>seriously.
John Morris posts to obfuscate or do "damage control" on inconvenient
facts about Jews and the holohoax. Even if Jews were in 100% of all
media positions, Morris would still be claiming "So what. Just
because Jews own 100% of the media doesn't mean they
'own' the media, or run it for their own advantage." Yet if White
racialists owned even half the media the Jews own, Morris would have
his self-righteous panties in a tizzy, sermonizing over "White racism
in the media!" John Morris is a two-faced scumbag.
http://www.kaiwan.com/~ihrgreg/ Greg Raven's Website
http://www.webcom.com/~ezundel/english/welcome.html Zundelsite
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~lpauling/ Student Revisionist Resource Site
http://www.webcom.com/ezundel/english/LEUCHTER/leuchtertoc.html
http://www.codoh.com/irving/irving.html David Irving
http://www.codoh.com/ Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust
http://pubweb.acns.nwu.edu/~abutz/ Arthur R. Butz
http://www.air-photo.com/ Air Photo Evidence (John Ball)
http://www.adam.com.au/~fredadin/adins.html Adelaide Institute
http://www.codoh.com/rudolf/rudreport/rudreport.html
Brian Smith
http://www.natall.com
"A civilization which tolerates the existence of Kaplan and his filthy
business should be burned to the ground." I said. "We should make
a bonfire of the whole thing and then start over fresh "
_The Turner Diaries_. p. 85
>-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
\|/ Towards a New Consciousness. \|/
| A New Future. |
A New People.
>.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Roger Hughes
In message <338f2d73...@news.srv.ualberta.ca> -
John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) writes:
:>Saying that Jews are over-represented doesn't say anything about why
:>that might be significant.
To you it wouldn't be significant if 100% of all media owners and
employees were Jews. You just won't admit the obvious no matter what.
You're a Nizkook, and the purpose of being a Nizkook is to always defend
Jewish interests. Thanks for making that clear to everybody.
BTW, I posted _Who Rules America_ (and I'll keep posting it just to
demonstrate what a bunch of liars you really are). It answers all your
questions and explains WHY Jewish media control is significant. But you
know that already, don't you? Your questions are merely a propaganda
tactic and certainly aren't sincere.
**********************************************************
STOP THE HATE - SEPARATE!
**********************************************************
The National Alliance is the foremost separatist
organization for White men and women. Hear the NA's
Internet broadcasts at:
http://www.natall.com
http://www.natvan.com
**********************************************************
Abusive emails will be posted to the Usenet and ridiculed.
**********************************************************
FOR THE TRUTH ON THE "HOLOCAUST":
http://www.kaiwan.com/~ihrgreg/ Greg Raven's Website
http://www.webcom/~ezundel/english/welcome.html Zundelsite
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~lpauling/ Student Revisionists
http://www.codoh.com/irving/irving.html David Irving
http://pubweb.acns.nwu.edu/~abutz/ Arthur Butz
http://www.air-photo.com/ Air Photo Evidence (John Ball)
http://www.adam.com.au/~fredadin/adins,html Adelaide Inst.
***********************************************************
Leo Walsh
>> The following are some facts that should illustrate to any open-
minded
>> person the reality of control of our media by organized Jewry.
>
>
No, it is not. Perhaps you believe that the word "revisionism" refers
only to "revisionism pertaining to the events known as the Holocaust(TM).
" If so, then you are mistaken. Historical revisionism is a much
broader field than merely one's position on certain alleged events in
central Europe in the early 1940s.
>*************THIS IS REVELEVANT TO THE HOLOCAUST*******
>
>Debate the Holocaust?
> by Dan Johnson
>
> I am a WW2 vet who was in the 102nd Infantry Division which
>spear- headed the 9th Army drive across Europe to the Elbe River where
>we met the Russians. We liberated a number of the death and work camps
>as we went along.
>
> The camps, most of which were small could be drawn on for
>"free" labor. Political
> prisoners were worked to death and it didn't matter to the
>Germans, as there were plenty
> more where they came from. The whole idea was to get rid of the
>prisoners permanently
> and make a gain of free labor in the process.
Assuming this is true, can you explain what was wrong about it? Perhaps
those men were communists or more traditional criminals. It is a fact
that the Wehrmacht and the SS did liquidate a great many members of the
Communist Party. Good for them! Those savages represented a threat to
the entire Western way of life. Many Communists were also Jews, so just
because you saw a lot of Jewish corpses proves nothing about the intents
of the Germans.
Additionally, many Jews were traitors to the German state. For example,
they organized boycotts of German manufactured products during the Great
Depression. Germany was a nation that could only feed itself if it had
money from its foreign trade with which to purchase imported food.
Organizing a boycott of German exports constituted a declaration of war
against the German nation and people. These people were naturally placed
in prisons when the war broke out on a larger scale in 1939. There were
so many prisoners that temporary camps had to be established. Thanks to
the efforts of those soldiers allied with Stalin's death squads (such as
yourself) who were so successful in disrupting Germany's industry,
agriculture, trade and transport are no doubt largely responsible for the
fact that many of these prisoners subsequently died of malnutrition,
exposure, typhus, etc. How could the Germans provide for these traitors
when they could barely provide for their own loyal citizens?
John Morris
>In message <338f2d73...@news.srv.ualberta.ca> -
>John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) writes:
>:>Saying that Jews are over-represented doesn't say anything about why
>:>that might be significant.
>To you it wouldn't be significant if 100% of all media owners and
>employees were Jews. You just won't admit the obvious no matter what.
Sure I will. It is obvious that your hatred and fear Jews borders on
the pathological.
>You're a Nizkook, and the purpose of being a Nizkook is to always defend
>Jewish interests. Thanks for making that clear to everybody.
Thanks for making it clear to everybody that you are some kind of nut
who believes that anyone who disagrees with you is subject to Jewish
influence.
>BTW, I posted _Who Rules America_ (and I'll keep posting it just to
>demonstrate what a bunch of liars you really are).
All that you will demonstrate is that you are conspiracy theory kook.
BTW, I just reread the stupid thing, and I must say it doesn't become
less stupid by reposting it.
> It answers all your
>questions and explains WHY Jewish media control is significant.
No it doesn't. It draws a whole load of polemical and rhetorical
correlations which may or may not be true. I want statistical
correlations. Reposting the article does not magically create those
correlations.
> But you
>know that already, don't you? Your questions are merely a propaganda
>tactic and certainly aren't sincere.
Stop projecting your obsessions onto me.
Gord McFee
In message <5mmff8$1l...@newssvr01-int.news.prodigy.com> -
GEQ...@prodigy.com (Leo Walsh)30 May 1997 11:59:36 GMT writes:
:>
:>The following are some facts that should illustrate to any open-minded
If the Jews really controlled everything, like you little slimeballs
say, they would have surely offed you bunch of pathetic shits by now.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Thomas Stedham
Chuck Ferree <chu...@rio.com> wrote in article <339029...@rio.com>...
> Chuck Ferree wrote:
> First of all, the "media" of the world is not controlled by any one
> religion...Jewish or otherwise. So that fact, makes any post or
> statement regarding silly nonsense that Jews control the media,
> baloney.
Who said anything about a _religion_, Chuck? We are referring to the
_ethnic group_ known as "jews". You know, people with names like Newhouse,
Levine, Rothstein, Meyer, Eisner, Tisch, "Maxwell", Pulitzer, Goldenson,
Paley, Sarnoff, Friedman, Sagansky, Bloomberg, Tartikoff, Wasserman, etc.
These are the people we are referring to. Is it your position that "they"
do not "control" the media?
Thomas Stedham
> Debate the Holocaust?
> by Dan Johnson
> I am a WW2 vet who was in the 102nd Infantry Division which
> spear- headed the 9th Army drive across Europe to the Elbe River where
> we met the Russians. We liberated a number of the death and work camps
> first hand shortly after it was liberated.
>
> The ten-man combat team which I was a part of was directly
> involved in a place called Gardelegan. 1016 Jewish prisoners were being
burned alive there
> in a barn on the edge of town by the SS troops who held the town.
It is my belief that you are a liar. Post any documentation about this BS.
Burned alive in a barn, instead of simply being shot. Yeah, right.
The Obedient Goyim
On 2 Jun 97 03:19:01 GMT, gmc...@ibm.net (Gord McFee) wrote:
>In message <5mmff8$1l...@newssvr01-int.news.prodigy.com> -
>GEQ...@prodigy.com (Leo Walsh)30 May 1997 11:59:36 GMT writes:
>:>
>:>The following are some facts that should illustrate to any open-minded
>:>person the reality of control of our media by organized Jewry.
>
>If the Jews really controlled everything, like you little slimeballs
>say, they would have surely offed you bunch of pathetic shits by now.
>
>Gord McFee
In other words, if they have enough power they will murder anyone who
disagrees with them. Interesting assertion from Gord McFee.
John Morris
In <3390b697....@205.161.179.1>, csw...@labyrinth.net (Cliff
Swiger) wrote:
>On Thu, 29 May 1997 20:00:48 GMT, John....@UAlberta.CA (John
>Morris) wrote:
>
>>It is just as possible that Jews in charge of large media corporations
>>are more interested in making money than in setting editorial policy.
>>A list of Jewish names does not prove the case either way.
>No, in reality it does not.
Thank you.
> But, one simply has to look at the effect
>of the major media here in the US and decide if they agree with the
>overall message it delivers.
Good. When you are ready to provide a detailed analysis that
demonstrates the effects of mass media, I will be here. So far all I
have seen is some half-baked cliches about media yoked to Jew-hatred.
> I'm glad that you concede the issue that
>Ashkenazi Jews head up the major media and entertainment industry,
>this is very important.
>I think most readers understand that those who are the CEOs and sit on
>the boards of corporations, etc., make the decisions and pass the
>orders on from top down. Your allusion that even though they may have
>much money at stake, or a substantial number of stock shares, yet bite
>their nails in hopes that their employees will do what's best with
>their investment while remaining aloof is utter nonsense.
Nice strawman, but that is not my argument.
As I say, it is just as possible that Jews in charge of large media
corporations are more interested in making money than in setting
editorial policy.
Given that mass media corporations depend on advertising revenues for
their existence, a case could be made out that the CEOs of mass media
corporations are more interested in giving as much exposure as
possible to their advertisers advertisements than in creating
programming meant to push a secret political agenda.
If that were true--and it seems more likely than the paranoid notion
that "Jews" are trying to undermine the civilization which pays the
bills--you would then be in the position of having to show that the
major advertisers are also beholden to "the Jews".
[paranoid delusions, and half-baked cliches yoked to Jew-hatred
deleted]
TroyLaws
Chuck Ferree <chu...@rio.com> wrote:
>First of all, the "media" of the world is not controlled by any one
>religion...Jewish or otherwise. So that fact, makes any post or
>statement regarding silly nonsense that Jews control the media,
>baloney.
You are right Chuck, only the "boss" controls everything in a
company. In light of that, I respond as follows:
Courtesy of sbr...@micron.net (Brian Smith)
I) Media Conglomerates
1) WALT DISNEY
a- The largest media conglomerate in the world today
b- headed by Michael Eisner (Jewish)
c- the Walt Disney Picture group is headed by Joe Roth (Jewish) and
includes Touchstone Pictures and Caravan Pictures
d- Disney also owns Miramax pictures, which is headed by the Weinstein
brothers (Jewish)
e- Disney owns Capital Cities/ABC, whose subsidiary ESPN, is headed by
president and CEO Steven Bornstein (Jewish).
2) TIME WARNER
a- the =second= largest media conglomerate in the world today, behind
Walt Disney
b- headed by CEO Michael Levin (Jewish)
c- Time Warner's is the largest magazine publisher in the
country and includes Time, Sports Illustrated, People, and Fortune
(headed by Norman Pearlstine -- Jewish)
d- Time Warner's subsidiary HBO is the country's largest pay-TV cable
network
e- Time Warner is also the world's largest record company.
3) VIACOM
a) The third largest media conglomerate
b) Headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein -- Jewish).
Redstone =actually= owns 76% of Viacom's shares ($3 billion).
c) Viacom produces films through Paramount pictures which is headed
by Sherry Lansing (Jewish)
d) Produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest
networks and owns 12 television stations and 12 radio stations.
e) Viacom's publishing division Prentice Hall Simon & Schuster, and
Pocket Books, and distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster
Video stores.
f) Viacom is the world's largest provider of cable programming, most
notably through Showtime, MTV, and Nickelodeon.
4) NEWS CORPORATION
a) Rupert Murdoch, who is half Jewish, owns the fourth largest media
company, News Corporation, which owns Fox Television Network and
20th Century Fox Films, both of which are headed by Peter Chermin
(Jewish). Murdoch has never take public positions contrary to Jewish
interests.
NOTE: The leadership of the top 4 media conglomerates Disney,
Time Warner, Viacom, and News Corporation are Jewish.
5) Most of the television and movie production companies that are not
owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. New
World Entertainment which is considered the premiere independent TV
program producer in the U.S. is owned by Ronald Perelman (Jewish) who
also owns Revlon cosmetics.
6) The chairman of New World is the former head of entertainment
programming at NBC, Brandon Tartikoff (Jewish)
7) The best known of the smaller media companies is DreamWorks SKG
which formed in 1994 by recording industry mogul David Geffen
(Jewish), former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey Katzenbgerg
(Jewish), and film director Steven Spielberg (Jewish). With the cash
and connections these three possess it is likely that DreamWorld may
soon be in the same league as the big three media conglomerates.
8) Two other large production companies, MCA and Universal Pictures,
are both owned by Seagram Company, Ltd., the liquor giant, whose
president and CEO is Edgar Bronfman. (Jewish) Edgar Bronfman is also
president of the World Jewish Congress.
9) Films produced by the just the five largest motion picture
companies mentioned above -- Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount
(Viacom) and Universal (Seagram) -- accounted for 74 per cent of the
total box-office receipts for 1995.
10) The number five biggest media company is the Japanese Sony
Corporation, whose U.S. subsidiary, Sony Corporation of America, is
run by Michael Schulhof, a Jew. Alan J. Levin, another Jew heads the
Sony Pictures division.
II) Newspapers
Jews own the nation's 3 most prestigious and influential newspapers:
the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.
These 3 papers set the trends and guidelines for nearly all others.
They originate the news; the others merely copy it.
1) The New York Times
a- headed by CEO Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. (Jewish)
b- Executive editor is Max Frankel (Jewish)
c- Managing editor is Joseph Lelyveld (Jewish)
d- The Sulzberger familly also owns through the New York Times Co.,
33 other newspapers including the Boston Globe, 12 magazines including
McCall's and Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million
each. 7 radio and TV broadcasting companies.
e- The New York Times company transmits news stories, features, and
photographs by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and
magazines.
2) The Washington Post
a- Headed by Katherine Meyer Graham (Jewish). She is principal
stockholder and chairman of the board of the Washington Post Co.
b- Her son Donald is The Washington Post's publisher (Jewish).
c- The Washington Post Co, has a number of other media holdings in
newspapers, television, and magazines, most notably the nation's
number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek.
d- In a joint venture with the New York Times the Post publishes the
International Herald Tribune, the most widely distributed English
language daily in the world
3) The Wall Street Journal
a- Owned by the Dow Jones Company, whose chairman and CEO of Dow
Jones is Peter R. Kahn (Jewish)
b- The nation's largest circulation newspaper -- 1.8 million copies
each weekday.
c- The Dow Jones company also publishes 24 other daily newspapers and
the weekly financial tabloid Barron's, among others.
4) Other New York papers
a. In January of 1993 the New York Daily News was bought from the
estate of the late Jewish media mogul Robert Maxwell (born Ludvik Hoch
-- Jewish) by the real-estate developer Mortimer Zuckerman (Jewish).
The Village Voice is owned by Leonard Stern (Jewish) the billionaire
owner of the Hartz Mountain pet supply.
III) A Note on the Purported "free competition" of the print Media
After TV news, daily newspapers are the most influential information
medium in America today. Sixty million of them are sold each day.
They are divided into some 1500 publications.
Does this large number of publications indicate there exists
substantial independence and competition within the media industry?
Hardly.
Out of the 1500 only 25% are independently owned, and out of that
number only 100 have circulation over 100,000. Only a handful are
large enough to maintain independent reporting staffs outside their
own communities; the rest must depend on these few for all of their
national and international news.
In only 50 cities are there more than -one- daily newspaper, and
competition is frequently nominal even among them, as between morning
and afternoon editions under the same ownership. For example, several
cities including Birmingham, AL., Springfield, Mass., and Syracuse,
NY. have morning and afternoon editions that are both owned by Advance
Publications, a holding company of the Newhouse brothers (Jewish).
IV. The former top three TV networks ABC, NBC, and CBS and their
current status of ownership
The big three in television network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS,
and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are
no longer independent entities. While they -were- independent,
however, each was controlled by a Jew since its inception:
1) ABC: by Leonard Goldenson (Jewish)
a-- executive producers of ABC news programs are all Jewish: Victor
S. Neufeld (20/20), Bob Reichbloom (Good Morning America), and Rick
Kaplan (World News Tonight)
2) CBS: first by Willliam Paley (Jewish) and then by Laurence Tisch
(Jewish)
a-- recently purchased by Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
Nevertheless the man appointed by Laurence Tisch, Eric Ober (Jewish)
remains president of CBS News.
3) NBC: first by David Sarnoff and then by his son Robert Sarnoff
(both Jewish)
a-- NBC is now owned by General Electric; however, the NBC news
president is Andrew Lack (a Jew) as are executive producers Jeff
Zucker (Today), Jeff Gralnick (NBC Nightly News), and Neal Shapiro
(Dateline).
Also, for several decades these networks have been staffed from top to
bottom with Jews.
V. Other: e.g., the top 3 newsmagazines
1) Time magazine
a) weekly circulation of 4.1 million.
b) as mentioned before, Time magazine is part of the media
conglomerate Time Warner which is headed by Gerald Levin (Jewish)
2) Newsweek
a) weekly circulation of 3.2 million.
b) owned by Katherine Meyer Graham (Jewish)
3) U.S. News and World Report
a) weekly circulation of 2.3 million
b) owned by Mortimer Zuckerman (Jewish), who is also editor-in-chief
of the magazine
c) Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly magazine and as mentioned
before, New York's tabloid newspaper the Daily News which is the 6th
largest paper in the country.
4) the top publisher of children's books is Western Publishing, with
more than 50% of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard Snyder
(Jewish) who just replaced Richard Bernstein (Jewish)
5) Note on the Newhouse media empire: founded by the late Samuel
Newhouse, a Jewish immigrant from Russia. Now run by his two sons
Samuel and Donald Newhouse. Newhouse owns 26 daily newspapers
which include the top newspapers of Cleveland, Newark, and New
Orleans. Newhouse Broadcasting consists of 12 television broadcasting
stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the largest cable
networks; the Sunday supplement _Parade_, with a circulation of more
than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major magazines,
including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair,
Bride's, GQ,Self, House & Garden, and all the other magazines of the
wholly owned Conde Nast group.
VI. Gentile media ownership and control
Ted Turner: amassed a fortune in advertising and built a large and
successful cable-TV news network. Turner made a bid to takeover CBS.
To block the bid, CBS invited billionaire theater, hotel, insurance,
and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch (Jewish) to launch a "friendly"
takeover of the company, and from 1986 till 1995 Tisch was the
chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence
there. Subsequent effort by Turner to acquire a major network have
been obstructed by Levin's Time Warner, which owns nearly 20 percent
of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals. Subsequently,
Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner, publicly
charged that his former boss held a personal dislike for Jews.
Turner employs a number of Jews in key executive and managment
positions at CNN. Turner has never taken public positions contrary to
Jewish interests. Despite being an innovator and garnering headlines,
Turner has never commanded the wealth and power to be a true media
master. Furthermore, he has discussed a deal with Time Warner to
merge, which would make Time Warner the number one media conglomerate,
and Levin would become Ted Turner's boss. Turner may have decided if
you can't beat 'em, join 'em.
Even those newspapers still until under Gentile ownership and
management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue
that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely
contrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the
newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the
tune.
VII. CONCLUSION: the control of the opinion-molding media is nearly
monolithic. All of the controlled media -- television, radio,
newspaper, magazines, books, motion pictures -- speak with a single
voice, each reinforcing each other. Despite the appearance of
variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative source of facts or
ideas accessible to the great mass of people which might allow them to
form opinions at odds with those of the media masters. They are
presented with a single view of the world -- a world in which -every-
voice proclaims the equality of the races, the inerrant nature of the
Jewish "holocaust" tale, the immorality of attempting to halt the
hordes of third world immigrants pouring into America, and the
desirability of genocidal race-mixing. And we have just seen that the
media masters are to a large extent Jewish.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exercise your right to free speech at :
http://www.natvan.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leo Walsh
>First of all, the "media" of the world is not controlled by any one
>religion...Jewish or otherwise. So that fact, makes any post or
>statement regarding silly nonsense that Jews control the media,
>baloney.
Ridiculous! Your assertion that "the media is not controlled by any one
religion" does not refute the obvious fact that the U.S. media
establishment is dominated to an extremely disproportionate extent by
members of the Jewish race.
>Benefits from what? If your premise is wrong, which it is IMO, the
>question is simply beside the point. It's bigotry, nothing less.
Its bigotry for Whites to point out the extent of Jewish control and
manipulation of U.S. media outlets? How so? Why is it that Zionism
isn't bigotry, that "Black power" isn't bigotry, that "La Raza" isn't
bigotry, but standing up for the White race and for domestic American
control of our own institutions IS bigotry? Why is it that everything
beneficial for my people is evil and everything beneficial for the
foreigners which have come to inhabit my White homeland is good? You
wouldn't be favoring one side over another, now would you? Of course you
are (and so am I)! The differences are that I'm standing up for the
rights of the majority to be free and happy in their own nation which was
built by their forefathers and that same majority is composed of the race
that is synonymous with virtually all forms of human achievement. The
Jews, on the other hand, are synonymous with deceit, moral degradation,
perversions, slavery, homosexuality, theft, chicanery and legalistic
trickery. Their useful idiots, the Blacks and the Mexicans, are known
for criminal savagery, indolent laziness and low intelligence.
Mark Van Alstine
In article <01bc6efb$00a08de0$27b8...@tstedham.tusc.net>, "Thomas
Stedham" <tste...@tusc.net> wrote:
> > Debate the Holocaust?
> > by Dan Johnson
> > I am a WW2 vet who was in the 102nd Infantry Division which
> > spear- headed the 9th Army drive across Europe to the Elbe River where
> > we met the Russians. We liberated a number of the death and work camps
> > as we went along......
> > first hand shortly after it was liberated.
> >
> > The ten-man combat team which I was a part of was directly
> > involved in a place called Gardelegan. 1016 Jewish prisoners were being
> burned alive there
> > in a barn on the edge of town by the SS troops who held the town.
>
>
> It is my belief that you are a liar. Post any documentation about this BS.
> Burned alive in a barn, instead of simply being shot. Yeah, right.
It is my belief that Mr. Stedham is hoist by his own petard:
<begin quote>
"Subject: Investigation of Attrocities at Kauffring Camp #4 near Hulach,
Germany. (Hulach is near Landsberg).
"On May 1, 1945 I inspected 286 bodies lying in the compound of the above
camp. The examination as to the cause of death was of necessity quite
superficial and hurried. The cause of death could be roughly divided into
three catagories:
"1. 86 bodies were so severely burned that the burns themselves were
undoubtably the cause of death. Sworn statements of witnesses indicate
that these individuals were locked in the barracks at the compound and
that these buildings were deliberately set on fire with the attempt to
destroy all these bodies by the Germans shortly before the American troops
liberated this camp.
"2. 11 bodies were shot either in the head, chest or abdomen or in
different combinations of the above wounds sufficient to be the cause of
death.
"3. 189 bodies showed no gross external cause of death. All of these
bodies, as well as those in the foregoing two classifications, were
extremely emanciated; many of them had large decubitus sores, and all were
lice-infested. According to witnesses, typhus was present in this camp and
some could have died of this disease. However, according to other reliable
testimony, these individuals were murdered by hypodermic injection of an
unknown poison a matter of hours before the Americans liberated the
camp."(McCallum, 57-58)
Work Cited
McCallum, John Dennis. Crime Doctor. Mercer Island, Washington:
Writing Works, 1978.
<end quote>
Source: http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/l/larson.charles/kauffring
Mark
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line separating good and evil passes
not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties--but
right through every human heart--and all human hearts."
-- Alexander Solzhenitsyn, "The Gulag Archipelago"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leo Walsh
>:>person the reality of control of our media by organized Jewry.
>
>If the Jews really controlled everything, like you little slimeballs
>say, they would have surely offed you bunch of pathetic shits by now.
Just wait. What do you think all those "hate crime" laws are really
about? Its already illegal to punch someone, to vandalize a building,
etc. The "hate crime" laws are precisely about the criminalization of
certain thought and speech patterns. And who's to say that a lot of more
typical Americans, perhaps friends and family of yours, might not
eventually fit into the ever-expanding category of thought criminals or
speech criminals? How long will it remain legal to call Our President a
liar? How long will you be able to call for an end to the six billion
dollars of annual foreign aid to Israel? How long will it be legal to
express ANY politically incorrect view? If the National Alliance fails
then OF COURSE I and the others like me will be put in prison or killed
en masse. That's obvious. The question is, how many of the rest of you
will be joining us? More than a few, I'm betting.
Gord McFee
In message <19970603034...@ladder02.news.aol.com> -
got...@aol.com (Gothia)3 Jun 1997 03:49:44 GMT writes:
:>
:>gmc...@ibm.net (Gord McFee) wrote:
:>>If the Jews really controlled everything, like you little slimeballs
:>>say, they would have surely offed you bunch of pathetic shits by now.
:>They don't control "everything" ... yet. Just the media, the Executive
:>branch, the Congress, and most of the courts.
:>
:>Give them time!
:>
:>Besides, they are too afraid of guns to try to take us now. Just ask
:>Charles Schumer.
Yeah, they're shaking in their nylons.
But I thought you guys claimed they do it by subterfuge and trickery.
Can't you get your stories straight?
Gord McFee
In message <01bc6f0d$d8884b00$27b8...@tstedham.tusc.net> - "Thomas
Stedham" <tste...@tusc.net>2 Jun 97 04:28:29 GMT writes:
:>
:>Chuck Ferree <chu...@rio.com> wrote in article <339029...@rio.com>...
:>> Chuck Ferree wrote:
:>> First of all, the "media" of the world is not controlled by any one
:>> statement regarding silly nonsense that Jews control the media,
:>> baloney.
:>Who said anything about a _religion_, Chuck? We are referring to the
:>_ethnic group_ known as "jews". You know, people with names like Newhouse,
:>Levine, Rothstein, Meyer, Eisner, Tisch, "Maxwell", Pulitzer, Goldenson,
:>Paley, Sarnoff, Friedman, Sagansky, Bloomberg, Tartikoff, Wasserman, etc.
Hey cool, Tom. You can tell just by the name. Gee, "Stedham" sounds a
lot like "Friedman" to me. Guess your Jewish too, eh buddy?
Gord McFee
In message <3392ce1...@news2.cais.com> - go...@cais.com (The
Obedient Goyim)Mon, 02 Jun 1997 13:44:40 GMT writes:
:>
:>On 2 Jun 97 03:19:01 GMT, gmc...@ibm.net (Gord McFee) wrote:
:>
:>>In message <5mmff8$1l...@newssvr01-int.news.prodigy.com> -
:>>:>
:>>:>The following are some facts that should illustrate to any open-minded
:>>If the Jews really controlled everything, like you little slimeballs
:>>say, they would have surely offed you bunch of pathetic shits by now.
:>>
:>
:>In other words, if they have enough power they will murder anyone who
:>disagrees with them. Interesting assertion from Gord McFee.
Stupid assertion from Gord McFee, who should have read what he wrote
before he sent it. I should have said, "...they *could* have
surely...".
Brian Smith
John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) wrote:
[more bullshit -- snipped!]
http://www.kaiwan.com/~ihrgreg/ Greg Raven's Website
http://www.webcom.com/~ezundel/english/welcome.html Zundelsite
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~lpauling/ Student Revisionist Resource Site
http://www.webcom.com/ezundel/english/LEUCHTER/leuchtertoc.html
http://www.codoh.com/irving/irving.html David Irving
http://www.codoh.com/ Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust
http://pubweb.acns.nwu.edu/~abutz/ Arthur R. Butz
http://www.air-photo.com/ Air Photo Evidence (John Ball)
Jenn Starkman
In article <339994b4...@news.pnet.net>,
natio...@juno.com (Michael) wrote:
>On Tue, 27 May 97 05:27:57 GMT, bb...@freenet.carleton.ca (Jenn
>Starkman) wrote:
>
><everything snipped>
>
>All you have to do to make your point, Jenn (man or woman?), is to go
>to:
>
[gratuitous advertisement for Michael's favourite URL snipped]
>
>and point by point refute the facts in that article.
Gee, you really DON'T read, do you?
The fact remains that even if that article is true, all it is is a list of
Jews who hold high positions in the media, which is worthless, statistically,
unless you show comparable stats for NON-Jews so that people can compare.
I won't waste my time on an article which isn't statistically relevant to
begin with. If you TRULY want to show people that the Jooooos are in control
of the media, you will answer the following:
How many newspaper publishers are there in North America?
How many are privately held?
How many of those are held by Jewish investors?
How many are traded on the exchange?
How many are held by controlling Jewish investors?
How large is their market share?
How many magazine publishers are there in North America?
How many are privately held?
How many of those are held by Jewish investors?
How many are traded on the exchange?
How many are held by controlling Jewish investors?
How large is their market share?
How many cable broadcasters are there in North America?
How many are privately held?
How many of those are held by Jewish investors?
How many are traded on the exchange?
How many are held by controlling Jewish investors?
How large is their market share?
How many radio broadcasters are there in North America?
How many are privately held?
How many of those are held by Jewish investors?
How many are traded on the exchange?
How many are held by controlling Jewish investors?
How large is their market share?
How many television broadcasters are there in North America?
How many are privately held?
How many of those are held by Jewish investors?
How many are traded on the exchange?
How many are held by controlling Jewish investors?
How large is their market share?
THEN, perhaps we can have a truly objective viewpoint from which to start.
Jenn
******
Note: I am no longer using my freenet or Netcom e-mail accounts
in order to protect those servers from the mailbombing which I
have been subjected to recently. Anybody who would like to contact
me via e-mail should leave a message on alt.skinheads to that effect,
and I will be in touch with you.
Cliff Swiger
On 3 Jun 1997 11:02:37 GMT, GEQ...@prodigy.com (Leo Walsh) wrote:
>Ridiculous! Your assertion that "the media is not controlled by any one
>religion" does not refute the obvious fact that the U.S. media
>establishment is dominated to an extremely disproportionate extent by
>members of the Jewish race.
You are very correct here, Leo. I've pointed out many, many times that
the Ashkenazi Jewish control of the US major media and entertainment
industry cannot be denied. Those who state otherwise are simply
ignoring the facts or are paranoid over the subject. But, I always
point out that it is up to the individual who understands this reality
to determine if these Ashkenazi Jews are operating in a benevolent or
malevolent manner. Much of this is determined by each individual's
moral and political standards. If one is in favor of homosexuality,
race mixing, the disarming of the law abiding populace, non-White
immigration and the destruction of national boundaries then he sees
the Jews' efforts as "good". If he stands in opposition, then they are
"bad". One thing is certain: The Ashkenazi Jewish control of the major
media cannot be denied.
Good post on your part, by the way. Keep up the good work.
Cliff Swiger
http://www.natall.com
http://www.natvan.com
tste...@tusc.net
In article ,
gmc...@ibm.net (Gord McFee) wrote:
> In message - "Thomas
> Stedham" 2 Jun 97 04:28:29 GMT writes:
{Chuck's stuff snipped for brevity}
> :>Who said anything about a _religion_, Chuck? We are referring to the
> :>_ethnic group_ known as "jews". You know, people with names like Newhouse,
> :>Levine, Rothstein, Meyer, Eisner, Tisch, "Maxwell", Pulitzer, Goldenson,
> :>Paley, Sarnoff, Friedman, Sagansky, Bloomberg, Tartikoff, Wasserman, etc.
>
> Hey cool, Tom. You can tell just by the name. Gee, "Stedham" sounds a
> lot like "Friedman" to me. Guess your Jewish too, eh buddy?
> Gord McFee
> I'll write no line before its time
No, "Gord". Stedham (my REAL name, btw) comes from Steadman, a very old
ENGLISH name. My people are whites, descended from English and Irish
settlers. We have traced our ancestry back to Cromwell times... All white
Europeans.
And, while you went off on an ad hominem side-track, you never managed to
address my point: that Hollywood is controlled by ethnic jews, such as
the ones I named above. I have seen pictures of most of them: I am a
Communications major in college, and we learn these things.
Would you like to discuss the POINT??? Or just obfuscate it some more?
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
tste...@tusc.net
In article <mvanalst-030...@rbi142.rbi.com>,
mvan...@rbi.com (Mark Van Alstine) tried his best, but failed:
{stuff snipped} an earlier poster claimed:
> > > The ten-man combat team which I was a part of was directly
> > > involved in a place called Gardelegan. 1016 Jewish prisoners were being
> > burned alive there
> > > in a barn on the edge of town by the SS troops who held the town.
I said:
> > It is my belief that you are a liar. Post any documentation about this BS.
> > Burned alive in a barn, instead of simply being shot. Yeah, right.
Mark tried:
> It is my belief that Mr. Stedham is hoist by his own petard:
Really? Here is the best that Mark could do (naturally my reply follows):
> <begin quote>>
> "Subject: Investigation of Attrocities at Kauffring Camp #4 near Hulach,
> Germany. (Hulach is near Landsberg).>
> "On May 1, 1945 I inspected 286 bodies lying in the compound of the above
> camp. The examination as to the cause of death was of necessity quite
> superficial and hurried. The cause of death could be roughly divided into
> three catagories:
>
> "1. 86 bodies were so severely burned that the burns themselves were
> undoubtably the cause of death. Sworn statements of witnesses indicate
> that these individuals were locked in the barracks at the compound and
> that these buildings were deliberately set on fire with the attempt to
> destroy all these bodies by the Germans shortly before the American troops
> liberated this camp.
>
> "2. 11 bodies were shot either in the head, chest or abdomen or in
> different combinations of the above wounds sufficient to be the cause of
> death.
>
> "3. 189 bodies showed no gross external cause of death. All of these
> bodies, as well as those in the foregoing two classifications, were
> extremely emanciated; many of them had large decubitus sores, and all were
> lice-infested. According to witnesses, typhus was present in this camp and
> some could have died of this disease. However, according to other reliable
> testimony, these individuals were murdered by hypodermic injection of an
> unknown poison a matter of hours before the Americans liberated the
> camp."(McCallum, 57-58)
> <end quote>
Sigh. Try again, Mark. The original poster spoke of:
>> " 1016 Jewish prisoners were being burned alive there in a barn on the edge >> of town by the SS troops who held the town..."
Your post refers to "286 bodies". No mention was made of whether they
were jewish bodies, civilian bodies, or what. What does your post have
to do with his post???
And your report speaks of "Kauffring Camp #4 near Hulach, Germany.
(Hulach is near Landsberg)". What does that have to do with the original
poster, who was referring to " Gardelegan"...?
Your report speaks of
> bodies were so severely burned that the burns themselves were
> undoubtably the cause of death
That's quite a presumption. Based on what? If they were so severely
burned, how could he say the burns were the cause of death, especially
since he said
>> "The examination as to the cause of death was of necessity quite superficial >> and hurried."
He then goes on to admit:
"..189 bodies showed no gross external cause of death. All of these
bodies, as well as those in the foregoing two classifications, were
extremely emanciated; many of them had large decubitus sores, and all were
lice-infested. According to witnesses, typhus was present in this camp and
some could have died of this disease. However, according to other reliable
testimony, these individuals were murdered by hypodermic injection of an
unknown poison a matter of hours before the Americans liberated the
camp."(McCallum, 57-58)
"Reliable testimony"??? What is he talking about? Testimony is what is
given in court... Does he mean "witnesses" like he said earlier? We all
know how reliable "witnesses" can be, don't we?
"Ya, dos Nadzis ver tryink to burn dem up in der barn. Ya."
It sounds like someone was trying to burn disease-carrying corpses, and
for whatever reason, 11 people were "shot" and thrown in as well. I
wonder why 200 of the 286 bodies weren't "so severely burned"...
You apparently felt that I was trying to say that bodies couldn't be
burned in barns. Nope. I said that I didn't believe the _poster_, who
stated that _1016 jewish prisoners were burned alive in a barn_.
Other barn burnings are irrelevant in regards to proving this, and I
pretty much demolished your barn burning, anyway.
Better luck next time, Mark.
Leo Walsh
>:>The following are some facts that should illustrate to any open-minded
>:>person the reality of control of our media by organized Jewry.
>
>If the Jews really controlled everything, like you little slimeballs
>say, they would have surely offed you bunch of pathetic shits by now.
Absolutely true! They don't (yet) control EVERYTHING. But if the Jews
had much more power, then a lot of American blood would be spilled. I
couldn't agree with you more.
Leo Walsh
>>The United States immigration policies were and
>>ARE based on race. Since the anti-white Emmanuel Cellar law was
passed
>>in the sixties, the quota is determined by the relative population of
>>the country of emigration as a percentage of world population.
>
>Sounds to me like you just said that US immigration laws are based on
>nationality, not race. Or do you think "country" means "race" as you
>would define race?
Technically, U.S. immigration policies are based on national origin, not
race. However, it should be noted that national origin correlates very
heavily with race, ie. there aren't a lot of White immigrants coming over
from Mexico, China, Nigeria, Haiti, El Salvador, Indonesia, etc. Since
the Jew-inspired Immigration "Reform" Act of 1965, there have been two
sets of quotas; one per nation and another for all total immigration. If
you add up all the individual national quotas, the sum total is higher
than the single quotas for all U.S. immigration. This means that those
nations which fill their quota first are in, while the others are out.
The practical (and intended) effect of this Act has been to encourage
literally massive immigration from the Third World while greatly
inhibiting immigration from Europe. If you want documentation, just
check out "Alien Nation" by Peter Brimelow, the senior editor of Forbes
magazine. This madness must end! America has enough poor people already.
We do not need to import an underclass from Mexico and the rest of the
backwards, despotic, disease-ridden Third World!
Leo Walsh
Chuck Ferree <chu...@rio.com> wrote:
> The ten-man combat team which I was a part of was directly
>involved in a place called
> Gardelegan. 1016 Jewish prisoners were being burned alive there
>in a barn on the edge of
> town by the SS troops who held the town.
Oh, come off it, Chuck E. Cheese! 1016 prisoners being burned alive in a
barn! Can you imagine anything more stupid, inefficient, logistically
difficult (virtually impossible) and just plain unwieldy and dumb? Next
time you want to tell some lies in favor of the Holohoax, you might try
spewing a few that have a modicum of credibility! Sheesh.
Leo Walsh
>:>>If the Jews really controlled everything, like you little slimeballs
>:>>say, they would have surely offed you bunch of pathetic shits by now.
>:>
>:>They don't control "everything" ... yet. Just the media, the
Executive
>:>branch, the Congress, and most of the courts.
>:>
>:>Give them time!
>:>
>:>Besides, they are too afraid of guns to try to take us now. Just ask
>:>Charles Schumer.
>
>But I thought you guys claimed they do it by subterfuge and trickery.
>Can't you get your stories straight?
That is precisely how they plan to do it, but that fact does not preclude
our invoking what Abraham Lincoln called our "revolutionary right" to
overthrow the collaborationist regime at some future date. The Judeo-
Bolshevist gangster clique is afraid to go too far too quickly as long as
patriotic Americans remain armed. That's why there's been such a big
push for gun control ever since the Jews' man, Bill Clinton, got into the
White House.
Jenn Starkman
In article <5mq5p7$8...@crack.usaor.net>, i...@usaor.net (Roger Hughes) wrote:
>In message <338f2d73...@news.srv.ualberta.ca> -
>John....@UAlberta.CA (John Morris) writes:
>
>:>Saying that Jews are over-represented doesn't say anything about why
>:>that might be significant.
>
>To you it wouldn't be significant if 100% of all media owners and
>employees were Jews. You just won't admit the obvious no matter what.
>Jewish interests. Thanks for making that clear to everybody.
>
>questions
No it doesn't. It doesn't answer the question of how many white people there
are in comparable positions to the Jews on your list, nor the question of why
you have trouble posting anything statistically relevant, rather than just a
random list of Jewish media executives.
>and explains WHY Jewish media control is significant.
No it doesn't--without statistically significant information, it doesn't
explain anything at all, except the jobs of a random list of Jewish media
executives, with no comparison to the number of white people with comparable
jobs.
Brian Smith
bb...@freenet.carleton.ca (Jenn Starkman) wrote:
>>and explains WHY Jewish media control is significant.
>No it doesn't--without statistically significant information, it doesn't
>explain anything at all, except the jobs of a random list of Jewish media
>executives, with no comparison to the number of white people with comparable
>jobs.
Yeah, ok, Jews control the media. Next!....
Michael
On Tue, 10 Jun 1997 02:25:01 GMT, sbr...@micron.net (Brian Smith)
wrote:
>bb...@freenet.carleton.ca (Jenn Starkman) wrote:
>
>>>and explains WHY Jewish media control is significant.
>
>>No it doesn't--without statistically significant information, it doesn't
>>explain anything at all, except the jobs of a random list of Jewish media
>>executives, with no comparison to the number of white people with comparable
>>jobs.
Hey Brian. I love those Nizkook tap dancers like this moron. So
Nizkook, nothing can be proven without "statisically significant
information". You care to define that and when it is and is not
applicable. "Jobs", "random list" "with no comparison..." According to
your 'now you see, it now you don't' criteria it is Not Proven that
the Democrat and Republican Parties are dominate in the Politcal Arena
until you have traced down every little registered political party in
the US and Then do a "comparison".
Now smell that thing you were digging and scratching with, while you
read this post. Twit.
>Yeah, ok, Jews control the media. Next!....
>
>http://www.kaiwan.com/~ihrgreg/ Greg Raven's Website
>http://www.webcom.com/~ezundel/english/welcome.html Zundelsite
>http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~lpauling/ Student Revisionist Resource Site
>http://www.webcom.com/ezundel/english/LEUCHTER/leuchtertoc.html
>http://www.codoh.com/irving/irving.html David Irving
>http://www.codoh.com/ Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust
>http://pubweb.acns.nwu.edu/~abutz/ Arthur R. Butz
>http://www.air-photo.com/ Air Photo Evidence (John Ball)
>http://www.adam.com.au/~fredadin/adins.html Adelaide Institute
>http://www.codoh.com/rudolf/rudreport/rudreport.html
>
>Brian Smith
>http://www.natall.com
>
>"A civilization which tolerates the existence of Kaplan and his filthy
>business should be burned to the ground." I said. "We should make
>a bonfire of the whole thing and then start over fresh "
>
>_The Turner Diaries_. p. 85
>
>>-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
> \|/ Towards a New Consciousness. \|/
> | A New Future. |
> A New People.
>>.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
>
natio...@juno.com
Michael
"http://www.natall.com"
National Vanguard Books
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946
"No man has come to true greatness who has not felt
in some degree that his life belongs to his race."
----Phillips Brooks
ErichBusse
In article <5n8t7k$3r...@newssvr02-int.news.prodigy.com>,
GEQ...@prodigy.com (Leo Walsh) writes:
>Chuck Ferree <chu...@rio.com> wrote:
>
>> The ten-man combat team which I was a part of was directly
>>involved in a place called Gardelegan. 1016 Jewish prisoners were
>>being burned alive there in a barn on the edge of
>>town by the SS troops who held the town.
>
>Oh, come off it, Chuck E. Cheese! 1016 prisoners being burned alive in a
>barn! Can you imagine anything more stupid, inefficient, logistically
>difficult (virtually impossible) and just plain unwieldy and dumb?
That story about the "ark of noah" for one. Seems to me these jews have
been
coming up with impossible tales for quite some time now. The old
"Wandering
Jew" story is anouther that comes to mind. Didn't they actually try to
claim a hoho-caust during The Great War as well? Seems I've seen an ole
jewish front
page to that effect.
> Next time you want to tell some lies in favor of the Holohoax, you might
try
>spewing a few that have a modicum of credibility! Sheesh.
I heard chucke is being considered to write the next speilberg
fabrication;
so abandon all hope for any future credibility.
>
>HTTP://WWW.NATALL.COM
>-
> LEO WALSH GEQ...@prodigy.com
>
>"Rebellion under Tyranny is Obedience before God."
>
>