Sara Salzman Children
No User
his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
---
This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was posted with the use of anonymizing software at
http://anon.xg.nu
---
jgÉb¨Ďwn@my-deja.com
Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie "BOOGERMAN" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
> I'm just glad my mother wasn't a pig!
Well, then, what _was_ your mother, Scottie, that she managed to raise a son so
completely devoid of honesty, integrity, and conscience?
JGB
================================================================== =====
Jeffrey G. Brown jg_b...@my-deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
Jeffrey G. Brown
> On Tue, 05 Dec 2000 22:31:48 -0500, jgÉb¨Ďw...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> >In article <opbr2tc0dhceo6m4q...@4ax.com>,
> >Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie "BOOGERMAN" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
> >
> >> I'm just glad my mother wasn't a pig!
>
> >Well, then, what _was_ your mother, Scottie, that she managed to raise a
> >son so
> >completely devoid of honesty, integrity, and conscience?
>
> Thus the nibbler of pee-pees chimes in!
I guess that answers my question...
Nicegoy
>From: No User no....@anon.xg.nu
>Date: 12/6/00 12:37 PM E. Australia Standard Time
>Message-id: <95ddeaf6fd166ab1...@anon.xg.nu>
This sick shit has gone far enough, cut it out whoever you are asshole.
Doc Tavish
>>Subject: Sara Salzman Children
>>From: No User no....@anon.xg.nu
>>Date: 12/6/00 12:37 PM E. Australia Standard Time
>>Message-id: <95ddeaf6fd166ab1...@anon.xg.nu>
>>
>>Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
>>his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
>>pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>This sick shit has gone far enough, cut it out whoever you are asshole.
I agree. Sara's children have no fault to be attached to them. They didn't
have any choice about the womb they would be conceived and gestated in.
They are to be pitied for having such a sow for a mother. They should on
the other hand love her and show her respect because after all she is
their mother. (I'm just glad my mother wasn't a pig!) Nuff said!
Doc Tavish
steve wolk
It's obvious your mother wasn't a pig. She was a whale.
Steve
Doc Tavish
>In article <opbr2tc0dhceo6m4q...@4ax.com>,
>Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie "BOOGERMAN" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>
>> I'm just glad my mother wasn't a pig!
>Well, then, what _was_ your mother, Scottie, that she managed to raise a son so
>completely devoid of honesty, integrity, and conscience?
Thus the nibbler of pee-pees chimes in!
Doc Tavish
>JGB
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <20001205214815...@ng-cm1.aol.com> in alt.revisionism,
on 06 Dec 2000 02:48:15 GMT, nic...@aol.com (Nicegoy) wrote:
>>From: No User no....@anon.xg.nu
>>Message-id: <95ddeaf6fd166ab1...@anon.xg.nu>
>>Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of
>>soiling his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been
>>treated twice for pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's
>>domicile.
>This sick shit has gone far enough, cut it out whoever you are
>asshole.
Please take one decency point from petty cash.
Don't spend it all in one place.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOi3fXzfbIykA6SysEQJ6egCg4jkCy+VzEt629UVYxuNFTSSvA70AoP1M
3fE5lJ6r/lL6mId8Exc4TqdL
=XD1p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Derek Bell
: This sick shit has gone far enough, cut it out whoever you are asshole.
Even Nicegoy is posting a condemnation!
Derek
--
Derek Bell db...@maths.tcd.ie | Socrates would have loved
WWW: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/index.html| usenet.
PGP: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/key.asc | - J...@bluejo.demon.co.uk
Derek Bell
: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
Piss off, you sad sack of lying shite!!
Derek Bell
: I agree. Sara's children have no fault to be attached to them.
Tavish posts what seems to be a noble comment followed by:
: They didn't have any choice about the womb they would be conceived and
: gestated in. They are to be pitied for having such a sow for a mother.
And again:
: They should on the other hand love her and show her respect because after all
: she is their mother.
Followed by:
: (I'm just glad my mother wasn't a pig!)
Derek - T minus *ONE*DAY* and counting...
Derek Bell
: In article <opbr2tc0dhceo6m4q...@4ax.com>,
: Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie "BOOGERMAN" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
: Well, then, what _was_ your mother, Scottie, that she managed to raise a son
: so completely devoid of honesty, integrity, and conscience?
Someone who regretted not doing a better job?
Derek Bell
: Thus the nibbler of pee-pees chimes in!
Tavish, you know bloody well that was a forgery, but you used it
anyway. About par for a Nazi!
Sara Salzman
<db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
>: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
>: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>
> Piss off, you sad sack of lying shite!!
>
> Derek
You know, once again I'm left to wonder exactly _what_ (if anything) is
going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything Sara
says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
posting."
If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my father,
and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away" from
alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
above do it?
I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can tell.
Sara
--
"I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
Edith Sitwell
david michael
Sara Salzman wrote:
Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
David
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Sara Salzman
<david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
Once again, m shows that he's all for smearing and trolling, as long as
it comces from his side.
And when forced to come face to face with his own hypocrisy, he makes
the convenient claim that "we're doing it to ourselves."
Funny... that was exactly what some of the Nazis said about the
persecution of the Jews.
You're a bloody hypocrite, m, and that's an exact quote from _you_.
mod...@my-deja.com
It isn't always about you or your cause, m, it could be about smearing
innocent people. You really don't understand that concept do you?
--
Melody S. Blaiser
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Orac
>Sara Salzman wrote:
>
>> In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
>> <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>>
>> >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>> >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
>> >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
>> >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>> >
>> You know, once again I'm left to wonder exactly _what_ (if anything) is
>> going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
>>
>> I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything Sara
>> says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
>> infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
>> posting."
>>
>> If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my father,
>> and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away" from
>> alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
>> above do it?
>>
>> I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
>> bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
>> own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can tell.
>>
>> Sara
>>
>> --
>>
>> "I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
>> Edith Sitwell
>
>Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
Do you have any evidence that "No User" is posting such disgusting and
unjustified things about Sara and her children in order to "smear revisionism"?
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
david michael
Sara Salzman wrote:
> In article <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>, david michael
> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
> >Sara Salzman wrote:
> >
> >> In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
> >> <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
> >>
> >> >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
> >> >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
> >> >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
> >> >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
> >> >
> >> > Piss off, you sad sack of lying shite!!
> >> >
> >> > Derek
> >>
> >> You know, once again I'm left to wonder exactly _what_ (if anything) is
> >> going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
> >>
> >> I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything Sara
> >> says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
> >> infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
> >> posting."
> >>
> >> If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my father,
> >> and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away" from
> >> alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
> >> above do it?
> >>
> >> I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
> >> bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
> >> own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can tell.
> >>
> >> Sara
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> "I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
> >> Edith Sitwell
> >
> >Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
> >
> >David
> >
> >
> Once again, m shows that he's all for smearing and trolling, as long as
> it comces from his side.
>
How?
>
> And when forced to come face to face with his own hypocrisy, he makes
> the convenient claim that "we're doing it to ourselves."
>
Evidence that you're not?
>
> Funny... that was exactly what some of the Nazis said about the
> persecution of the Jews.
>
Where?
>
> You're a bloody hypocrite, m, and that's an exact quote from _you_.
>
You're just a whiner.
>
> Sara
>
> --
>
> "I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
> Edith Sitwell
David
Orac
jgÉb¨Ďw...@my-deja.com wrote:
>In article <opbr2tc0dhceo6m4q...@4ax.com>,
>Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie "BOOGERMAN" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>> I'm just glad my mother wasn't a pig!
>
>Well, then, what _was_ your mother, Scottie, that she managed to raise a son
>so completely devoid of honesty, integrity, and conscience?
Well, sometimes even when parents try their hardest to do a good job, their
child ends up being a slimeball devoid of honesty, integrity, and conscience.
Orac
(Nicegoy) wrote:
>>Subject: Sara Salzman Children
>>From: No User no....@anon.xg.nu
>>Date: 12/6/00 12:37 PM E. Australia Standard Time
>>Message-id: <95ddeaf6fd166ab1...@anon.xg.nu>
>>
>>Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
>>his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
>>pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>>
>>
>>
>This sick shit has gone far enough, cut it out whoever you are asshole.
There may be hope for you, yet.
david michael
Orac wrote:
> In article <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>, david michael
> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
> >Sara Salzman wrote:
> >
> >> In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
> >> <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
> >>
> >> >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>
> >> >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
> >> >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
> >> >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
> >> >
> >> You know, once again I'm left to wonder exactly _what_ (if anything) is
> >> going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
> >>
> >> I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything Sara
> >> says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
> >> infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
> >> posting."
> >>
> >> If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my father,
> >> and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away" from
> >> alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
> >> above do it?
> >>
> >> I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
> >> bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
> >> own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can tell.
> >>
> >> Sara
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> "I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
> >> Edith Sitwell
> >
> >Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
>
> Do you have any evidence that "No User" is posting such disgusting and
> unjustified things about Sara and her children in order to "smear revisionism"?
>
> --
> Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> |
> |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
> | inconvenience me with questions?"
Yes.
That would seem to be the only thing that such a post could accomplish.
As Ms Salzman pointed out.
mod...@my-deja.com
No, it is an assault on Sara. It is intimidation.
If she was "anonymous" you would probably be complaining about that.
tallpaul (Paul Kneisel)
"smearing innocent people." He makes use of the concept all of the time.
One particular aspect of fascist rhetorical techniques is to accuse the
person you're about to attack of attacking you. Accuse someone of
"smearing" you and then defame them; defame them and immediately accuse
them of "smearing" you. Defame them and then demand that people of good
faith protest "smearing."
-- tallpaul (Paul Kneisel)
Editor: The Internet Anti-Fascist
<http://www.anti-fascism.org>
On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 16:32:36 GMT, mod...@my-deja.com
<90lpn4$efg$1...@nnrp1.deja.com> wrote:
>In article <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>,
> david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
...
>>
>> Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
>
Orac
<david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>Orac wrote:
>
>> In article <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>, david michael
>> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
>>
>> Do you have any evidence that "No User" is posting such disgusting and
>> unjustified things about Sara and her children in order to "smear
>> revisionism"?
>>
>Yes.
No. (See below.)
>That would seem to be the only thing that such a post could accomplish.
>
>As Ms Salzman pointed out.
She did not "point out" that "someone trying to smear revisionism" is the most
likely explanation for such disgusting, vile posts.
Even if she had said something to that effect, it merely constitute her opinion,
not proof that "someone trying to smear revisionism" did, in fact, post that
smear of Sarah's children.
Sara Salzman
<david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>Sara Salzman wrote:
>
>> In article <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>, david michael
>> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >Sara Salzman wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
>> >> <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>> >> >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of
>> >> >: soiling
>> >> >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice
>> >> >: for
>> >> >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>> >> >
>> >> > Piss off, you sad sack of lying shite!!
>> >> >
>> >> > Derek
>> >>
>> >> You know, once again I'm left to wonder exactly _what_ (if anything)
>> >> is
>> >> going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
>> >>
>> >> I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything
>> >> Sara
>> >> says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
>> >> infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
>> >> posting."
>> >>
>> >> If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my
>> >> father,
>> >> and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away"
>> >> from
>> >> alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
>> >> above do it?
>> >>
>> >> I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
>> >> bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
>> >> own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can
>> >> tell.
>> >>
>> >> Sara
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> "I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of
>> >> it."
>> >> Edith Sitwell
>> >
>> >Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
>> >
>> >David
>> >
>> >
>> Once again, m shows that he's all for smearing and trolling, as long as
>> it comces from his side.
>>
>
>How?
>
>>
>> And when forced to come face to face with his own hypocrisy, he makes
>> the convenient claim that "we're doing it to ourselves."
>>
>
>Evidence that you're not?
>
>>
>> Funny... that was exactly what some of the Nazis said about the
>> persecution of the Jews.
>>
>
>Where?
>
>>
>> You're a bloody hypocrite, m, and that's an exact quote from _you_.
>>
>
>You're just a whiner.
>
Really?! So when a comment was made about _your_ wife... I believe it
had something to do with doubts that she really existed and could have,
in fact, have been an inflatible doll... you got quite hysterical and
demanded retraction of this... SLANDER!!
But I'm a whiner.
Once again, m, you're a bloody hypocrite, by your own admission.
Buck Turgidson
david michael wrote:
> Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> > In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
> > <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
> >
> > >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
> > >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
> > >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
> > >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
> > >
> > > Piss off, you sad sack of lying shite!!
> > >
> > > Derek
> >
> > You know, once again I'm left to wonder exactly _what_ (if anything) is
> > going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
> >
> > I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything Sara
> > says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
> > infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
> > posting."
> >
> > If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my father,
> > and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away" from
> > alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
> > above do it?
> >
> > I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
> > bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
> > own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can tell.
> >
> > Sara
> >
> Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
>
> David
Oh, get stuffed, you hateful, pompous ass.
-- Dep
"Always tell the truth. It's the § "Truth is just...truth. You can't
easiest thing to remember." § have opinions about truth."
--David Mamet --Peter Schickele
"It doesn't require much thought. One does not need 'facts' to interpret."
--The Liar David E. Michael
Doc Tavish
<david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>Sara Salzman wrote:
>
>> In article <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>, david michael
>> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >Sara Salzman wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
>> >> <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>> >> >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>> >> >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
>> >> >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
>> >> >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>> >> > Piss off, you sad sack of lying shite!!
>> >> >
>> >> > Derek
>> >> You know, once again I'm left to wonder exactly _what_ (if anything) is
>> >> going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
>> >>
>> >> I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything Sara
>> >> says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
>> >> infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
>> >> posting."
>> >>
>> >> If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my father,
>> >> and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away" from
>> >> alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
>> >> above do it?
>> >>
>> >> I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
>> >> bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
>> >> own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can tell.
>> >>
>> >> Sara
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> "I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
>> >> Edith Sitwell
>> >Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
>> >
>> >David
>> Once again, m shows that he's all for smearing and trolling, as long as
>> it comces from his side.
>How?
>> And when forced to come face to face with his own hypocrisy, he makes
>> the convenient claim that "we're doing it to ourselves."
>Evidence that you're not?
>> Funny... that was exactly what some of the Nazis said about the
>> persecution of the Jews.
>Where?
>> You're a bloody hypocrite, m, and that's an exact quote from _you_.
>You're just a whiner.
Don't you mean an oinker? I can hear that sow squeal even when my computer
is turned off! :-)
Doc Tavish
>> Sara
>David
steve wolk
Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
> <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
> >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
> >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
> >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
> >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
> >
> > Piss off, you sad sack of lying shite!!
> >
> > Derek
>
> You know, once again I'm left to wonder exactly _what_ (if anything) is
> going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
>
> I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything Sara
> says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
> infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
> posting."
>
> If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my father,
> and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away" from
> alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
> above do it?
>
> I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
> bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
> own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can tell.
>
> Sara
Brain-damaged? Perhaps. Morally bankrupt? Certainly. But the words
that best describe this 'person' (and I use the term loosely) are
'depraved' and 'pervert'.
Steve
steve wolk
Doc Tavish wrote:
>
> On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 16:27:28 +0000, david michael
> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
> >Sara Salzman wrote:
> >
> >> In article <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>, david michael
> >> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Sara Salzman wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
> >> >> <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
> >> >> >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
> >> >> >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
> >> >> >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
> >> >> >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>
> >> >> > Piss off, you sad sack of lying shite!!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Derek
>
> >> >> You know, once again I'm left to wonder exactly _what_ (if anything) is
> >> >> going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
> >> >>
> >> >> I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything Sara
> >> >> says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
> >> >> infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
> >> >> posting."
> >> >>
> >> >> If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my father,
> >> >> and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away" from
> >> >> alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
> >> >> above do it?
> >> >>
> >> >> I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
> >> >> bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
> >> >> own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can tell.
> >> >>
> >> >> Sara
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >> "I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
> >> >> Edith Sitwell
>
> >> >Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
> >> >
> >> >David
>
> >> Once again, m shows that he's all for smearing and trolling, as long as
> >> it comces from his side.
>
> >How?
>
> >> And when forced to come face to face with his own hypocrisy, he makes
> >> the convenient claim that "we're doing it to ourselves."
>
> >Evidence that you're not?
>
> >> Funny... that was exactly what some of the Nazis said about the
> >> persecution of the Jews.
>
> >Where?
>
> >> You're a bloody hypocrite, m, and that's an exact quote from _you_.
>
> >You're just a whiner.
>
> Don't you mean an oinker? I can hear that sow squeal even when my computer
> is turned off! :-)
>
> Doc Tavish
Even over the sound of your whale-songs? Amazing!
Steve
>
> >> Sara
>
> >David
Gord McFee
david michael wrote:
About what I would have expected from you.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Gord McFee
david michael wrote:
>
> Orac wrote:
>
>
>> In article <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>, david michael
>> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Sara Salzman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
>>>> <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> : Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
>>>>> : his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
>>>>> : pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You know, once again I'm left to wonder exactly _what_ (if anything) is
>>>> going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
>>>>
>>>> I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything Sara
>>>> says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
>>>> infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
>>>> posting."
>>>>
>>>> If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my father,
>>>> and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away" from
>>>> alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
>>>> above do it?
>>>>
>>>> I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
>>>> bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
>>>> own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can tell.
>>>>
>>>> Sara
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> "I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
>>>> Edith Sitwell
>>>
>>> Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
>>
>> Do you have any evidence that "No User" is posting such disgusting and
>> unjustified things about Sara and her children in order to "smear revisionism"?
>
> Yes.
Let's see it.
> That would seem to be the only thing that such a post could accomplish.
That is not evidence, that is simply self serving speculation on your part.
> As Ms Salzman pointed out.
She pointed out nothing of the kind.
But you made it clear that you will support any form of harassment and
filth as long as it is directed against your "enemies".
Philip Mathews
>Doc Tavish doc_tavi...@scottsmail.com wrote:
>On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 16:27:28 +0000, david michael
><david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
>>Sara Salzman wrote:
>>
>>> In article <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>, david michael
>>> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Sara Salzman wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
>>> >> <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
>>> >> >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>>> >> >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of
>soiling
>>> >> >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice
>for
>>> >> >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>
>>> >> > Piss off, you sad sack of lying shite!!
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Derek
>
>>> >> You know, once again I'm left to wonder exactly _what_ (if anything) is
>>> >> going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
>>> >>
>>> >> I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything Sara
>>> >> says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
>>> >> infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
>>> >> posting."
>>> >>
>>> >> If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my father,
>>> >> and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away"
>from
>>> >> alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
>>> >> above do it?
>>> >>
>>> >> I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
>>> >> bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
>>> >> own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can tell.
>>> >>
>>> >> Sara
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >>
>>> >> "I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
>>> >> Edith Sitwell
>
>>> >Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
>>> >
>>> >David
>
>>> Once again, m shows that he's all for smearing and trolling, as long as
>>> it comces from his side.
>
>>How?
>
>>> And when forced to come face to face with his own hypocrisy, he makes
>>> the convenient claim that "we're doing it to ourselves."
>
>>Evidence that you're not?
>
>>> Funny... that was exactly what some of the Nazis said about the
>>> persecution of the Jews.
>
>>Where?
>
>>> You're a bloody hypocrite, m, and that's an exact quote from _you_.
>
>>You're just a whiner.
>
>Don't you mean an oinker? I can hear that sow squeal even when my computer
>is turned off! :-)
Why, that's just the sound you make when lowering yourself into your chair,
Scottie!
--
Philip Mathews
"Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing
knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant
than would take even a little trouble to acquire it." Samuel Johnson
Philip Mathews
> david michael david_...@onetel.net.uk wrote:
>Orac wrote:
>
>> In article <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>, david michael
>> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >Sara Salzman wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
>> >> <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>>
>> >> >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
>> >> >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice
>for
>> >> >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>> >> >
>> >> You know, once again I'm left to wonder exactly _what_ (if anything) is
>> >> going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
>> >>
>> >> I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything Sara
>> >> says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
>> >> infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
>> >> posting."
>> >>
>> >> If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my father,
>> >> and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away" from
>> >> alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
>> >> above do it?
>> >>
>> >> I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
>> >> bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
>> >> own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can tell.
>> >>
>> >> Sara
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> "I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
>> >> Edith Sitwell
>> >
>> >Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
>>
>> Do you have any evidence that "No User" is posting such disgusting and
>> unjustified things about Sara and her children in order to "smear
>revisionism"?
>>
>> --
>> Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
>> |
>> |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
>> | inconvenience me with questions?"
>
>Yes.
>
>That would seem to be the only thing that such a post could accomplish.
So Don Ellis was attempting the same thing when he posted similarly about
Sara's children?
>
>As Ms Salzman pointed out.
Gee,interesting to see you have such a liberal notion of evidence.
Nicegoy
>From: david michael david_...@onetel.net.uk
>Date: 12/7/00 1:51 AM E. Australia Standard Time
>Message-id: <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>
>
>
>
>Sara Salzman wrote:
>
>> In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
>> <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>>
>> >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>> >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
>> >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
>> >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>> >
>> >
>> > Derek
>>
>> going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
>>
>> I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything Sara
>> says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
>> infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
>> posting."
>>
>> If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my father,
>> and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away" from
>> alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
>> above do it?
>>
>> I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
>> bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
>> own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can tell.
>>
>> Sara
>>
>> --
>>
>> "I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
>> Edith Sitwell
>
>Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
>
It crossed my mind too David, either was it's sick and should be discontinued.
Nicegoy
>Date: 12/6/00 4:43 PM E. Australia Standard Time
>Message-id: <npnr2tsueuo9n5gdj...@4ax.com>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>In <20001205214815...@ng-cm1.aol.com> in alt.revisionism,
>on 06 Dec 2000 02:48:15 GMT, nic...@aol.com (Nicegoy) wrote:
>
>>>From: No User no....@anon.xg.nu
>>>Message-id: <95ddeaf6fd166ab1...@anon.xg.nu>
>
>>>Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of
>>>soiling his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been
>>>treated twice for pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's
>>>domicile.
>
>>asshole.
>
No thanks, the Shekel is worthless here.
>
>Don't spend it all in one place.
Sigh...conditions, conditions, anything about only spending it at a Jew rag
shop.
Do not misconstrue my post as weakness Morris.
It simply revolves around the fact that Ms Salzman, although choosing to wade
knee deep in the sewerage that flows through here, has managed to remain aloof,
unlike you who swim and gargle in it.
I happen to be a father myself, although self educated, I managed to support my
wife through University as well as my daughter who funnily enough holds a
degree in linguistics...... perhaps the old man could take lessons!
No doubt you will use this revelation against me at a later stage.
You see, I do not hold all Academics to be bigoted uninformed assholes...just
you and a few others like the proctologist.
So you see, I understand parental pride and the desire to protect ones
children.
I therefore find the post relating to Sarah's kids reprehensible and feel the
poster concerned plumbs the lowest of the deepest pothole in the sewer.
david michael
mod...@my-deja.com wrote:
> In article <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>,
> david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sara Salzman wrote:
> >
> > > In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
> > > <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
> > >
> > > >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
> > > >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of
> soiling
> > > >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated
> twice for
> > > >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
> > > >
> It isn't always about you or your cause, m,
What are you talking about, incoherent one?
> it could be about smearing
> innocent people. You really don't understand that concept do you?
>
You are babbling.
>
> --
> Melody S. Blaiser
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
David
david michael
mod...@my-deja.com wrote:
> In article <3A2E6974...@onetel.net.uk>,
> david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Orac wrote:
> >
> > > In article <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>, david michael
> > > <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Sara Salzman wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
> > > >> <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
> > >
> > > >> >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of
> soiling
> > > >> >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated
> twice for
> > > >> >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
> > > >> >
> > > Do you have any evidence that "No User" is posting such disgusting
> and
> > > unjustified things about Sara and her children in order to "smear
> revisionism"?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> > > |
> > > |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
> > > | inconvenience me with questions?"
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > That would seem to be the only thing that such a post could
> accomplish.
> >
> > As Ms Salzman pointed out.
>
> No, it is an assault on Sara.
Incorrect. If it were, she would be able to make a complaint to the police.
> It is intimidation.
>
Possibly. But it might also be an attempt to smear revisionists. Note the
silly 'Poland is communist' thread initiated by the same poster.
>
> If she was "anonymous" you would probably be complaining about that.
>
I have never 'complained' about posters who wish to be anonymous.
Gord McFee
> >Message-id: <95ddeaf6fd166ab1...@anon.xg.nu>
> >
> >Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
> >his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
> >pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
> >This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
> >It was posted with the use of anonymizing software at
> >http://anon.xg.nu
> >---
> >
>
> This sick shit has gone far enough, cut it out whoever you are asshole.
We have had our disagreements, but I respect the fact you have the
decency to post that.
david michael
tallpaul (Paul Kneisel) wrote:
> She is being too kind to Michael.
Quite right, comrade. I should be deported to Siberia, right?
> Of course he understands the concept of
> "smearing innocent people." He makes use of the concept all of the time.
>
> One particular aspect of fascist rhetorical techniques is to accuse the
> person you're about to attack of attacking you.
Oooh perish the thought that anyone should ever attack the users of what
Marxists call 'fascist rhetorical techniques'.
> Accuse someone of
> "smearing" you and then defame them; defame them and immediately accuse
> them of "smearing" you. Defame them and then demand that people of good
> faith protest "smearing."
>
Stick to flooding, comrade. Rational argument is not your strong point.
>
> -- tallpaul (Paul Kneisel)
> Editor: The Internet Anti-Fascist
> <http://www.anti-fascism.org>
>
> On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 16:32:36 GMT, mod...@my-deja.com
> <90lpn4$efg$1...@nnrp1.deja.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <3A2E6067...@onetel.net.uk>,
> > david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> ...
>
> >>
> >> Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
> >
> >It isn't always about you or your cause, m, it could be about smearing
> >innocent people. You really don't understand that concept do you?
David
Gord McFee
No, we don't do that kind of thing.
> You see, I do not hold all Academics to be bigoted uninformed assholes...just
> you and a few others like the proctologist.
>
> So you see, I understand parental pride and the desire to protect ones
> children.
>
> I therefore find the post relating to Sarah's kids reprehensible and feel the
> poster concerned plumbs the lowest of the deepest pothole in the sewer.
And as I said, and also as a father, I agree.
Gord McFee
Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> In article <90l71e$2e1k$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
> <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
> >No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
> >: Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
> >: his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
> >: pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
> >
> > Piss off, you sad sack of lying shite!!
> >
> > Derek
>
> You know, once again I'm left to wonder exactly _what_ (if anything) is
> going through the mind of the person who posted this screed.
>
> I mean, let's try and understand it: "Gee, I can't refute anything Sara
> says, I can't make her go away, so maybe I'll try making up some
> infantile lies and THAT will insult her so badly that she'll stop
> posting."
>
> If threats to my safety, threats to my neighbors, threats to my father,
> and even forged threats to president Clinton didn't "drive me away" from
> alt.revisionism, why would something as stupid and transparent as the
> above do it?
>
> I believe it's simply a case of someone so brain-damaged and morally
> bankrupt that they actually enjoy making up trash like this for their
> own amusement. It certainly has no other effect, as far as I can tell.
And in a nutshell, that is why they fear and loathe you so much.
Sara Salzman
Sara Salzman
nic...@aol.com (Nicegoy) wrote:
Thank you. Unfortunately, this is minor compared to the other attacks on
my children these ... people... have tried. That included claiming my
son (and daughter) were planning to blow up a local high school, threats
to contact DHS (whatever that is... I assume they meant Children's
Services), forged posts from my children (including an especially
vicious one forged in my daughter's name claiming I was forcing her to
perform sex acts for money), ad nauseum.
Personal attacks are par for the course in this sewer. And most of us
accept that fact. It goes with the territory. Potty-talk about my
children, however, is simply a sign of an unstable and pathetic mind.
(And that, of course, includes Mr. Bradbury's "I wouldn't be calling
anyone a moron seeing how you have two retarded offspring-- must be YOUR
gene pool has a defect!" comment from earlier this evening.)
Sara Salzman
doc_tavi...@scottsmail.com wrote:
>
>Don't you mean an oinker? I can hear that sow squeal even when my computer
>is turned off! :-)
>
> Doc Tavish
>
Hearing voices is a definite sign of mental illness, Mr. Bradbury. Seek
help!!
Doc Tavish
>In article <cj8t2t4ug2498paca...@4ax.com>,
>doc_tavi...@scottsmail.com wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Don't you mean an oinker? I can hear that sow squeal even when my computer
>>is turned off! :-)
>>
>> Doc Tavish
>Hearing voices is a definite sign of mental illness, Mr. Bradbury. Seek
>help!!
>
>Sara
Listen to the sow squeal! Squeal sow squeal. Listen to the sow oink.
Oink oink so oink. Watch me call the sow:
SUE SUE SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEY PIG PIG SOW MOMMA SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEY
Watch the sow waddle along! oink oink oink
David S. Maddison
+0000 david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
[..]
>Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
You have to be joking!
So-called "revisionism" (as in Holocaust Denial, not legitimate
historical revisionism) smears itself perfectly well without the need
of outside assistance.
Posts of the type that smear Sara and her children are merely
representative of the type of scum that denial historical facts such
as the Holocaust.
And you, yourself, are not clean of reprehensible behaviour - consider
your deliberate act to direct a "bi-racial" couple in the wrong
direction as a starting point.
David Maddison
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <20001206194238...@ng-fj1.aol.com> in alt.revisionism,
on 07 Dec 2000 00:42:38 GMT, nic...@aol.com (Nicegoy) wrote:
>>From: John Morris John....@UAlberta.CA
>>Message-id: <npnr2tsueuo9n5gdj...@4ax.com>
>>In <20001205214815...@ng-cm1.aol.com> in
>>alt.revisionism, on 06 Dec 2000 02:48:15 GMT, nic...@aol.com
>>(Nicegoy) wrote:
>>>>From: No User no....@anon.xg.nu
>>>>Message-id: <95ddeaf6fd166ab1...@anon.xg.nu>
>>>>Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of
>>>>soiling his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been
>>>>treated twice for pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in
>>>>Sara's domicile.
>>>This sick shit has gone far enough, cut it out whoever you are
>>>asshole.
>>Please take one decency point from petty cash.
>No thanks, the Shekel is worthless here.
So, you consider decency to be a Jewish trait, do you? ;-)
>>Don't spend it all in one place.
>Sigh...conditions, conditions, anything about only spending it at a
>Jew rag shop.
>Do not misconstrue my post as weakness Morris.
I consider the decency of your response a positive strength.
>It simply revolves around the fact that Ms Salzman, although
>choosing to wade knee deep in the sewerage that flows through here,
>has managed to remain aloof, unlike you who swim and gargle in it.
>I happen to be a father myself,
Me too.
> although self educated,
Me too, until I decided to go to university as a mature student.
>I managed to support my
>wife through University as well as my daughter who funnily enough
>holds a degree in linguistics...... perhaps the old man could take
>lessons!
>No doubt you will use this revelation against me at a later stage.
Not at all.
>You see, I do not hold all Academics to be bigoted uninformed
>assholes...just you and a few others like the proctologist.
And I do not hold all bigoted, uniformed assholes in the contempt I
hold you.
See? We have so much in common.
>So you see, I understand parental pride and the desire to protect
>ones children.
Quite so.
>I therefore find the post relating to Sarah's kids reprehensible and
>feel the poster concerned plumbs the lowest of the deepest pothole
>in the sewer.
I agree completely.
Ed Kadach also objected to sewer tactics. Perhaps you know of him?
David E. Michael called him a "Nizkor plant." Watch your step.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOi9gaTfbIykA6SysEQJkHgCfdfLEwPofioN5Yed7EX4rGNzp3fsAnjN3
BgUx2vyBNkQulWGQAHueQ+fs
=IJia
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
mod...@my-deja.com
david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
>
> tallpaul (Paul Kneisel) wrote:
>
> > She is being too kind to Michael.
>
> Quite right, comrade. I should be deported to Siberia, right?
Not there, no, for you would have too much freedom.
mod...@my-deja.com
david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> mod...@my-deja.com wrote:
> > > That would seem to be the only thing that such a post could
> > accomplish.
> > >
> > > As Ms Salzman pointed out.
> >
> > No, it is an assault on Sara.
>
> Incorrect. If it were, she would be able to make a complaint to the
police.
What is it is has nothing to do with her ability to make a complaint to
the police.
> > It is intimidation.
> >
>
> Possibly.
Intimidation is exactly what it is.
> But it might also be an attempt to smear revisionists. Note the
> silly 'Poland is communist' thread initiated by the same poster.
Evidence is something you do not have, m.
> >
> > If she was "anonymous" you would probably be complaining about that.
> >
>
> I have never 'complained' about posters who wish to be anonymous.
LOL! What a card you are.
mod...@my-deja.com
david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> mod...@my-deja.com wrote:
> > > Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
> >
> > It isn't always about you or your cause, m,
>
> What are you talking about, incoherent one?
Your cause is holocaust denial.
> > it could be about smearing
> > innocent people. You really don't understand that concept do you?
> >
>
> You are babbling.
You are farting.
ron0...@my-deja.com
No User <no....@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
> Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
> his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice
for
> pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>
Westword photos prove that Sara is a filthy, pack-rat beast. She also
has proven time and time again to neglict her children. It is 100%
Sara's fault for her son being fucked up the way he is. It is 100%
Sara's fault that she can't give her daughter a decent haircut.
Clearly this is a woman with a lot of problems.
ron0...@my-deja.com
doc_tavi...@scottsmail.com wrote:
> On 06 Dec 2000 02:48:15 GMT, nic...@aol.com (Nicegoy) wrote:
>
> >>Subject: Sara Salzman Children
> >>From: No User no....@anon.xg.nu
> >>Message-id: <95ddeaf6fd166ab1...@anon.xg.nu>
> >>
> >>Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of
soiling
> >>his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice
for
> >>pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>
asshole.
>
didn't
> have any choice about the womb they would be conceived and gestated
in.
> They are to be pitied for having such a sow for a mother. They should
on
> the other hand love her and show her respect because after all she is
> their mother. (I'm just glad my mother wasn't a pig!) Nuff said!
>
> Doc Tavish
Since Sara does not give a fuck about her children why should we be
worrying about them either? Those kids are fucked genetically by an
unfit slob of a mother.
ron0...@my-deja.com
Once you realize that, maybe you will actually start helping them
instead of stuffing your 300 pound face with more food pack rat.
Jeffrey G. Brown
> Your children are defective retards from a horrible excuse for a mother.
> Once you realize that, maybe you will actually start helping them
> instead of stuffing your 300 pound face with more food pack rat.
Don Ellis has recently been involved in a campaign of harassment against several
individuals who post to Usenet and who have had the temerity to disagree with
Donnie. His harassment of one such individual, Sara Salzman, was recently
documented in an article by Westword magazine
<http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/feature3.html/page1.html>. This
excerpt from that article serves to illuminate the -- for lack of a better term
-- "thought" processes of Don Ellis:
--- begin excerpt ---
On July 18, Westword contacted the only Don Ellis in the 2,000-person town
of Star City. He said he didn't know of a Sara Salzman and that her
situation was "kind of news to me." The following conversation ensued:
Westword: Are you the Don Ellis who used to operate The American Guardian
Web site?
Ellis: There is no American Guardian Web site.
Westword: Did you used to operate a Web site called The American Guardian?
Ellis: [no reply]
Westword: Did you used to operate a Web site called HateWatch of America?
Ellis: Ummm...not to my knowledge.
Westword: Have you ever posted negative messages about Sara Salzman or
anyone else to alt.revisionism?
Ellis: I haven't posted anything in three or four months.
Westword: Have you ever posted to alt.revisionism?
Ellis: I'm not sure. I'd have to check my files. She should just turn the
computer off. She should just back out of the situation. I have had death
threats, and I just ignore them. It's probably just someone blowing off
steam.
And later:
Westword: Sara Salzman claims nasty messages have been posted about her in
a news group.
Ellis: What kind of nasty messages?
Westword: Things like "Sara Salzman is a dyke. Sara Salzman is a dog-fucker."
Ellis: Well, is she? [A couple of moments of silence.] So, does she do
those things?
Westword: All I can tell you is that someone has been posting messages
saying she does, and she's not happy about it.
Ellis: How do you know that she doesn't do those things?
--- end excerpt ---
'Nuff said...
JGB
================================================================== =====
Jeffrey G. Brown jg_b...@my-deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
Nicegoy
>Date: 12/7/00 1:06 PM E. Australia Standard Time
>Message-id: <3A2EFEB1...@sympatico.ca>
LOL...It really is the season of good will to all men, Gord and Nicegoy agree
on somthing!
Nicegoy
>From: John Morris John....@UAlberta.CA
>Message-id: <kinu2tchdkmv4lg39...@4ax.com>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>on 07 Dec 2000 00:42:38 GMT, nic...@aol.com (Nicegoy) wrote:
>
>>>From: John Morris John....@UAlberta.CA
>>>Message-id: <npnr2tsueuo9n5gdj...@4ax.com>
>
>>>alt.revisionism, on 06 Dec 2000 02:48:15 GMT, nic...@aol.com
>>>(Nicegoy) wrote:
>
>>>>>From: No User no....@anon.xg.nu
>>>>>Message-id: <95ddeaf6fd166ab1...@anon.xg.nu>
>
>>>>>Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of
>>>>>soiling his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been
>>>>>treated twice for pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in
>>>>>Sara's domicile.
>
>>>>This sick shit has gone far enough, cut it out whoever you are
>>>>asshole.
>
>>>Please take one decency point from petty cash.
>
>>No thanks, the Shekel is worthless here.
>
>
>
>>Sigh...conditions, conditions, anything about only spending it at a
>>Jew rag shop.
>
>>Do not misconstrue my post as weakness Morris.
>
>
>>choosing to wade knee deep in the sewerage that flows through here,
>>has managed to remain aloof, unlike you who swim and gargle in it.
>
>>I happen to be a father myself,
>
>
>> although self educated,
>
>Me too, until I decided to go to university as a mature student.
>
>>wife through University as well as my daughter who funnily enough
>>holds a degree in linguistics...... perhaps the old man could take
>>lessons!
>
>>No doubt you will use this revelation against me at a later stage.
>
>
>>You see, I do not hold all Academics to be bigoted uninformed
>>assholes...just you and a few others like the proctologist.
>
>hold you.
>
>See? We have so much in common.
>
Yes it's true, you do have potential, I will keep working on you.
>>So you see, I understand parental pride and the desire to protect
>>ones children.
>
>Quite so.
>
>>I therefore find the post relating to Sarah's kids reprehensible and
>>feel the poster concerned plumbs the lowest of the deepest pothole
>>in the sewer.
>
>I agree completely.
>
>Ed Kadach also objected to sewer tactics. Perhaps you know of him?
>David E. Michael called him a "Nizkor plant." Watch your step.
>
>- --
> John Morris
LOL....being labeled a Nizkor plant is the least of my worries, it has already
been done.
You may note that when I first came here, I went for some time without lowering
myself, in spite of the cries of 'wormtongue, asshole, etc.
It however became aparent that while in Rome (modern) one should speak Italian.
Your achievments as a age student are commendable.
I however would prefer to read and contemplate on a diverse range of reference
material, some esoteric and incompatible with the establishments belief system.
I am also a firm believer in the truth.
So you see, I would be an abject failure in your mainstream production line
institutes of 'higher learning".
Ever seen 'With Honors", I'm the bumb Simon Wilder (shudder...played by the
chosenite Peschi).
Nicegoy
>Date: 12/7/00 2:26 AM E. Australia Standard Time
>Message-id: <Orac-C623AA.1...@news.earthlink.net>
>
>In article <20001205214815...@ng-cm1.aol.com>, nic...@aol.com
>>>Date: 12/6/00 12:37 PM E. Australia Standard Time
>>>Message-id: <95ddeaf6fd166ab1...@anon.xg.nu>
>>>
>>>Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
>>>his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
>>>pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>This sick shit has gone far enough, cut it out whoever you are asshole.
>
>
>--
>Orac
Not in your wildest nightmares orac.
Sara Salzman
John....@UAlberta.CA wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>In <20001206194238...@ng-fj1.aol.com> in alt.revisionism,
>on 07 Dec 2000 00:42:38 GMT, nic...@aol.com (Nicegoy) wrote:
>
>>>From: John Morris John....@UAlberta.CA
>>>Message-id: <npnr2tsueuo9n5gdj...@4ax.com>
>
>>>In <20001205214815...@ng-cm1.aol.com> in
>>>alt.revisionism, on 06 Dec 2000 02:48:15 GMT, nic...@aol.com
>>>(Nicegoy) wrote:
>
>>>>>From: No User no....@anon.xg.nu
>>>>>Message-id: <95ddeaf6fd166ab1...@anon.xg.nu>
>
>>>>>Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of
>>>>>soiling his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been
>>>>>treated twice for pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in
>>>>>Sara's domicile.
>
>>>>This sick shit has gone far enough, cut it out whoever you are
>>>>asshole.
>
>>>Please take one decency point from petty cash.
>
>>No thanks, the Shekel is worthless here.
>
>So, you consider decency to be a Jewish trait, do you? ;-)
>
>>>Don't spend it all in one place.
>
>>Sigh...conditions, conditions, anything about only spending it at a
>>Jew rag shop.
>
>>Do not misconstrue my post as weakness Morris.
>
>I consider the decency of your response a positive strength.
>
>>It simply revolves around the fact that Ms Salzman, although
>>choosing to wade knee deep in the sewerage that flows through here,
>>has managed to remain aloof, unlike you who swim and gargle in it.
>
>>I happen to be a father myself,
>
>Me too.
>
>> although self educated,
>
>Me too, until I decided to go to university as a mature student.
>
>>I managed to support my
>>wife through University as well as my daughter who funnily enough
>>holds a degree in linguistics...... perhaps the old man could take
>>lessons!
>
>>No doubt you will use this revelation against me at a later stage.
>
>Not at all.
>
>>You see, I do not hold all Academics to be bigoted uninformed
>>assholes...just you and a few others like the proctologist.
>
>And I do not hold all bigoted, uniformed assholes in the contempt I
>hold you.
>
>See? We have so much in common.
>
>>So you see, I understand parental pride and the desire to protect
>>ones children.
>
>Quite so.
>
>>I therefore find the post relating to Sarah's kids reprehensible and
>>feel the poster concerned plumbs the lowest of the deepest pothole
>>in the sewer.
>
>I agree completely.
>
>Ed Kadach also objected to sewer tactics. Perhaps you know of him?
>David E. Michael called him a "Nizkor plant." Watch your step.
>
Ironically, even David Michael, before he had that operation to remove
his compassion, agreed:
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 15:34:40 +0000
<38984E90...@btinternet.com>
<quote>
I'll be adding my name to the complaint list. Thugs like Ellis
have nothing to do with revisionism. If you wish to take legal
action against him, that too will have my full support.
</quote>
Patrick L. Humphrey
>In article <cj8t2t4ug2498paca...@4ax.com>,
>doc_tavi...@scottsmail.com wrote:
>>Don't you mean an oinker? I can hear that sow squeal even when my computer
>>is turned off! :-)
>Hearing voices is a definite sign of mental illness, Mr. Bradbury. Seek
>help!!
He'll just say that the rest of us are jealous because the voices talk to
_him_. :-)
--PLH, maybe he's been reading the buttons on Dale's hat
Patrick L. Humphrey
>On 07 Dec 2000 04:38:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>In article <cj8t2t4ug2498paca...@4ax.com>,
>>doc_tavi...@scottsmail.com wrote:
>>>Don't you mean an oinker? I can hear that sow squeal even when my computer
>>>is turned off! :-)
>>Hearing voices is a definite sign of mental illness, Mr. Bradbury. Seek
>>help!!
>Listen to the sow squeal! Squeal sow squeal. Listen to the sow oink.
>Oink oink so oink. Watch me call the sow:
>SUE SUE SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEY PIG PIG SOW MOMMA SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEY
>Watch the sow waddle along! oink oink oink
Blaming others for YOUR caterwauling is a sign of loose screws in the head,
too, Scottie.
--PLH, the butterfly nets are ready
Patrick L. Humphrey
>In article <3A2EFEC2...@onetel.net.uk>,
> david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>> tallpaul (Paul Kneisel) wrote:
>> > She is being too kind to Michael.
>> Quite right, comrade. I should be deported to Siberia, right?
>Not there, no, for you would have too much freedom.
What good would it do him, if you found a nice, vast unpopulated part of it?
This would be the perfect time of year to let him experience all the freedom
he wants.
--PLH, the depths of winter are still two months away
Gord McFee
Nicegoy wrote:
>> Subject: Re: Sara Salzman Children
>> From: Gord McFee gord....@sympatico.ca
>> Date: 12/7/00 1:06 PM E. Australia Standard Time
>> Message-id: <3A2EFEB1...@sympatico.ca>
> LOL...It really is the season of good will to all men, Gord and Nicegoy agree
> on somthing!
I am glad we agree on something like this. But we had better go back to
our usual flaming or you will be accused of consorting with the enemy.
C.Nay
>>Subject: Sara Salzman Children
>>From: No User no....@anon.xg.nu
>>Date: 12/6/00 12:37 PM E. Australia Standard Time
>>Message-id: <95ddeaf6fd166ab1...@anon.xg.nu>
>>
>>Sara's retarded son has been sent home three
>>times because of soiling his pants. Sara's
>>equally retarded daughter has been treated
>>twice for pin worms. Personal hygiene is
>>lacking in Sara's domicile.
>>
>This sick shit has gone far enough, cut it out
>whoever you are asshole.
Agreed. It accomplishes nothing.
- --
Philip Mathews
> ron0...@my-deja.com wrote:
>Your children are defective retards from a horrible excuse for a mother.
You're supposed to pump the gas Donnie, not sniff it!
--
Philip Mathews
"Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing
knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant
than would take even a little trouble to acquire it." Samuel Johnson
david michael
mod...@my-deja.com wrote:
> In article <3A2EFE3E...@onetel.net.uk>,
> david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
> > mod...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> > > > That would seem to be the only thing that such a post could
> > > accomplish.
> > > >
> > > > As Ms Salzman pointed out.
> > >
> > > No, it is an assault on Sara.
> >
> > Incorrect. If it were, she would be able to make a complaint to the
> police.
>
> What is it is has nothing to do with her ability to make a complaint to
> the police.
>
Sure it does. Assault is a criminal offence. Posting silly posts to
alt.revisionism is not. If you were correct in characterizing the post as
'assault' then she would be able to make a complaint to the police.
>
> > > It is intimidation.
> > >
> >
> > Possibly.
>
> Intimidation is exactly what it is.
>
Possibly.
>
> > But it might also be an attempt to smear revisionists. Note the
> > silly 'Poland is communist' thread initiated by the same poster.
>
> Evidence is something you do not have, m.
>
Same FROM heading and style.
>
> > >
> > > If she was "anonymous" you would probably be complaining about that.
> > >
> >
> > I have never 'complained' about posters who wish to be anonymous.
>
> LOL! What a card you are.
>
You do post a lot of nonsense.
>
> --
> Melody S. Blaiser
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
David
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
david michael
mod...@my-deja.com wrote:
> In article <3A2EFD14...@onetel.net.uk>,
> david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
> > mod...@my-deja.com wrote:
> > > > Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
> > >
> > > It isn't always about you or your cause, m,
> >
> > What are you talking about, incoherent one?
>
> Your cause is holocaust denial.
>
A lie, as has been pointed out to you many times. My cause is to
question, not to 'deny', and the term 'Holocaust' is too vague to be of
use in serious analysis (as opposed to rabid propaganda).
How weak *your* cause must be that you are forced to reduce to lies in
order to promote it.
However, most of your anti-revisionist fellow travellers seem to be
facing the same problem.
>
> > > it could be about smearing
> > > innocent people. You really don't understand that concept do you?
> > >
> >
> > You are babbling.
>
> You are farting.
>
You are disgusting.
Orac
(Nicegoy) wrote:
>>Subject: Re: Sara Salzman Children
>>From: Orac Or...@wlsfanmail.com
>>Date: 12/7/00 2:26 AM E. Australia Standard Time
>>Message-id: <Orac-C623AA.1...@news.earthlink.net>
>>
>>In article <20001205214815...@ng-cm1.aol.com>, nic...@aol.com
>>(Nicegoy) wrote:
>>
>>>>Subject: Sara Salzman Children
>>>>From: No User no....@anon.xg.nu
>>>>Date: 12/6/00 12:37 PM E. Australia Standard Time
>>>>Message-id: <95ddeaf6fd166ab1...@anon.xg.nu>
>>>>
>>>>Sara's retarded son has been sent home three times because of soiling
>>>>his pants. Sara's equally retarded daughter has been treated twice for
>>>>pin worms. Personal hygiene is lacking in Sara's domicile.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>This sick shit has gone far enough, cut it out whoever you are asshole.
>>
>>There may be hope for you, yet.
>>
>>--
>>Orac
>
>Not in your wildest nightmares orac.
I'm an eternal optimist.
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
Patrick L. Humphrey
>ron0...@my-deja.com wrote:
><bilge>
>Does your lawyer know you're still posting in a.r., Donnie?
None of his sockpuppets know what the others are doing.
--PLH, not that that's news
Derek Bell
: Thank you. Unfortunately, this is minor compared to the other attacks on
: my children these ... people... have tried. That included claiming my
: son (and daughter) were planning to blow up a local high school, threats
: to contact DHS (whatever that is... I assume they meant Children's
: Services), forged posts from my children (including an especially
: vicious one forged in my daughter's name claiming I was forcing her to
: perform sex acts for money), ad nauseum.
Sara, I have to say that the attacks on your family members are the
lowest thing I've seen in this newsgroup, and that's saying a lot.
But I also know you, your husband and the rest of your family will
not kowtow to this extremely vicious bullying.
: Personal attacks are par for the course in this sewer. And most of us
: accept that fact. It goes with the territory. Potty-talk about my
: children, however, is simply a sign of an unstable and pathetic mind.
: (And that, of course, includes Mr. Bradbury's "I wouldn't be calling
: anyone a moron seeing how you have two retarded offspring-- must be YOUR
: gene pool has a defect!" comment from earlier this evening.)
Bradbury is a really, really nasty piece of work - he deserves
everything that's coming to him.
Derek
--
Derek Bell db...@maths.tcd.ie | Socrates would have loved
WWW: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/index.html| usenet.
PGP: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/key.asc | - J...@bluejo.demon.co.uk
Derek Bell
: Your children are defective retards from a horrible excuse for a mother.
: instead of stuffing your 300 pound face with more food pack rat.
Hey, shit for brains!! Go fuck yourself!!
Sara
<db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
If it wasn't so completely pathetic, it would be funny. Here's Bradbury
and Don/Pat talking about "MY" gene pool... as if their father had no
input whatsoever into their genetic makeup.
Then there were the "bad haircut" comments about my daughter... except
they were referring to a picture taken in the early 1930s of my MOTHER.
Then there were the attacks against my dead grandparents, and the
accusation that I only wanted money, although no one in my family has
ever made a claim for reparations.
Most fascintaing were Don/Pat's comments the other day about "one day
your son will read these comments." In fact, he's already read them. In
fact, they formed of the basis of a talk I gave to area high schools
about Holocaust Denial. I showed excerpts from Don/Pat, Bradbury, "No
User," and the rest of them. The concensus was, as you would expect,
complete amazement that theses "people" thought their comments would be
taken seriously.
The attacks against my children, as vile as it is, is a living,
breathing example of the depths to which people can sink when Hate
controls them.
Sara
--
"It's always nice to see a prejudice overruled by a deeper prejudice."
John Sayles, _Lone Star_
Patrick L. Humphrey
>ron0...@my-deja.com wrote:
>: Your children are defective retards from a horrible excuse for a mother.
>: Once you realize that, maybe you will actually start helping them
>: instead of stuffing your 300 pound face with more food pack rat.
> Hey, shit for brains!! Go fuck yourself!!
Don't encourage him...who needs *clones* of Donnie running loose? (The
deniers trying to impersonate him are bad enough.)
--PLH, and you thought tribbles were bad...
Gord McFee
david michael wrote:
>
> mod...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
>
>> In article <3A2EFD14...@onetel.net.uk>,
>> david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> mod...@my-deja.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
>>>>
>>>> It isn't always about you or your cause, m,
>>>
>>> What are you talking about, incoherent one?
>>
>> Your cause is holocaust denial.
>
> A lie, as has been pointed out to you many times. My cause is to
> question, not to 'deny', and the term 'Holocaust' is too vague to be of
> use in serious analysis (as opposed to rabid propaganda).
Then how can you question it if it is too vague "to be of use in serious
analysis"? You are so phoney, David.
Gord McFee
Sara wrote:
> If it wasn't so completely pathetic, it would be funny. Here's Bradbury
> and Don/Pat talking about "MY" gene pool... as if their father had no
> input whatsoever into their genetic makeup.
>
> Then there were the "bad haircut" comments about my daughter... except
> they were referring to a picture taken in the early 1930s of my MOTHER.
>
> Then there were the attacks against my dead grandparents, and the
> accusation that I only wanted money, although no one in my family has
> ever made a claim for reparations.
>
> Most fascintaing were Don/Pat's comments the other day about "one day
> your son will read these comments." In fact, he's already read them. In
> fact, they formed of the basis of a talk I gave to area high schools
> about Holocaust Denial. I showed excerpts from Don/Pat, Bradbury, "No
> User," and the rest of them. The concensus was, as you would expect,
> complete amazement that theses "people" thought their comments would be
> taken seriously.
>
> The attacks against my children, as vile as it is, is a living,
> breathing example of the depths to which people can sink when Hate
> controls them.
And your courage, and that of your loved ones, in the face of this
singular and disgusting harassment, are examples of the heights to which
people can aspire.
tallpaul (Paul Kneisel)
On Fri, 08 Dec 2000 04:12:50 +0000, david michael
<david_...@onetel.net.uk> <3A305FC2...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
>A lie, as has been pointed out to you many times. My cause is to
>question, not to 'deny', and the term 'Holocaust' is too vague to be of
>use in serious analysis (as opposed to rabid propaganda).
>
tallpaul (Paul Kneisel)
Nicegoy
>Message-id: <3A302DD7...@sympatico.ca>
It appears this is a well precedented Christmas tradition.
Story has it that it happened regularly in the trenches during WW1.
Gord McFee
Nicegoy wrote:
>>> LOL...It really is the season of good will to all men, Gord and Nicegoy
>>
>> agree
>>
>>> on somthing!
>>
>> I am glad we agree on something like this. But we had better go back to
>> our usual flaming or you will be accused of consorting with the enemy.
>
> It appears this is a well precedented Christmas tradition.
>
> Story has it that it happened regularly in the trenches during WW1.
It did, and then they went out and killed each other. Come back from
the Dark Side, Nicegoy. :-)
Derek Bell
: Don't encourage him...who needs *clones* of Donnie running loose? (The
: deniers trying to impersonate him are bad enough.)
*SHUDDER*!!
Derek Bell
: If it wasn't so completely pathetic, it would be funny. Here's Bradbury
: input whatsoever into their genetic makeup.
These clowns *are* pathetic!
: Then there were the "bad haircut" comments about my daughter... except
: they were referring to a picture taken in the early 1930s of my MOTHER.
You know, these deniers seem to get stupider the longer they post -
presumably it's a sign of them being driven by hate to make any kind of attack
they feel like - it's probably a sign of desperation that they are trying to
smear you and your family this much.
: Then there were the attacks against my dead grandparents, and the
: accusation that I only wanted money, although no one in my family has
: ever made a claim for reparations.
Facts aren't what they're interested in - they just want to hurl
stereotypes at you.
: Most fascintaing were Don/Pat's comments the other day about "one day
: your son will read these comments." In fact, he's already read them. In
: fact, they formed of the basis of a talk I gave to area high schools
: about Holocaust Denial. I showed excerpts from Don/Pat, Bradbury, "No
: User," and the rest of them. The concensus was, as you would expect,
: complete amazement that theses "people" thought their comments would be
: taken seriously.
Don/Pat sounded like they were trying to threaten him!
: The attacks against my children, as vile as it is, is a living,
: breathing example of the depths to which people can sink when Hate
: controls them.
Hopefully, the example of Bradbury will discourage others, though that
may be too optimistic.
Derek Bell
: And your courage, and that of your loved ones, in the face of this
: people can aspire.
Agreed wholeheartedly.
Jason James
"Doc Tavish" <doc_tavi...@scottsmail.com> wrote in message
news:abfu2tol8hk5hl3qv...@4ax.com...
> On 07 Dec 2000 04:38:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <cj8t2t4ug2498paca...@4ax.com>,
> >doc_tavi...@scottsmail.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >>Don't you mean an oinker? I can hear that sow squeal even when my
computer
> >>is turned off! :-)
> >>
>
> >Hearing voices is a definite sign of mental illness, Mr. Bradbury. Seek
> >help!!
> >
>
> Listen to the sow squeal! Squeal sow squeal. Listen to the sow oink.
> Oink oink so oink. Watch me call the sow:
>
> SUE SUE SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEY PIG PIG SOW MOMMA SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEY
>
> Watch the sow waddle along! oink oink oink
Over the edge Porky goes.....ohh the joy of it :-)
JJ
Cheryl
<deppi...@pop.mindspring.com> wrote:
[..]
>> Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
>>
>> David
>
>Oh, get stuffed, you hateful, pompous ass.
>
IOW, Scot agrees but he doesn't have to like it.
Derek Bell
: In >Message-id: <90ovok$43u$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>
:> ron0...@my-deja.com wrote:
:>Your children are defective retards from a horrible excuse for a mother.
The scary thing is I don't think he'd sniffed any gas when he posted
it!!
tallpaul (Paul Kneisel)
<david_...@onetel.net.uk> <3A305FC2...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
>My cause is to question, not to 'deny'
>
whereas in the rest of the sentence he concluded
david michael
tallpaul (Paul Kneisel) wrote:
If you are claiming that those two sentences are contradictory then you are
evidently suffering from an excessive intake of vodka, comrade.
Buck Turgidson
Cheryl wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 14:52:51 -0600, Buck Turgidson
> <deppi...@pop.mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> >> Perhaps someone trying to smear revisionism?
> >>
> >> David
> >
> >Oh, get stuffed, you hateful, pompous ass.
> >
>
> IOW, Scot agrees but he doesn't have to like it.
Interesting view of reality you have there, Chris, recto-cranially
speaking.
-- Dep
"Always tell the truth. It's the § "Truth is just...truth. You can't
easiest thing to remember." § have opinions about truth."
--David Mamet --Peter Schickele
"It doesn't require much thought. One does not need 'facts' to
interpret."
--The Liar David E. Michael
Andy
"david michael" <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:3A3303C5...@onetel.net.uk...
>
>
> tallpaul (Paul Kneisel) wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 Dec 2000 04:12:50 +0000, david michael
> > <david_...@onetel.net.uk> <3A305FC2...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >My cause is to question, not to 'deny'
> > >
> >
> > whereas in the rest of the sentence he concluded
> >
> > >
> > > and the term 'Holocaust' is too vague to be of
> > >use in serious analysis (as opposed to rabid propaganda).
> > >
>
> If you are claiming that those two sentences are contradictory then you
are
> evidently suffering from an excessive intake of vodka, comrade.
>
Do you ever try to answer questions, or assertions, without smears, BHS?
<cue patter of tiny guinea pig feet>
Andy
Patrick L. Humphrey
>Patrick L. Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>: Don't encourage him...who needs *clones* of Donnie running loose? (The
>: deniers trying to impersonate him are bad enough.)
> *SHUDDER*!!
Indeed, there are some things man was *not* meant to know.
--PLH, and that one's near the top of the list
Gord McFee
david michael wrote:
>
> tallpaul (Paul Kneisel) wrote:
>
>
>> On Fri, 08 Dec 2000 04:12:50 +0000, david michael
>> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> <3A305FC2...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> My cause is to question, not to 'deny'
>>>
>>
>> whereas in the rest of the sentence he concluded
>>
>>
>>> and the term 'Holocaust' is too vague to be of
>>> use in serious analysis (as opposed to rabid propaganda).
>
> If you are claiming that those two sentences are contradictory then you are
> evidently suffering from an excessive intake of vodka, comrade.
I expect he was concluding that the two sentences serve only to expose
the waste of time in taking even the slightest bit seriously someone who
says he is here to question something that he considers too vague to be
of use in serious analysis. So much for any legitimacy in the David
Michael game.
steve wolk
Doubly interesting, since mr. little m is on record as sympathizing with
some of the goals of communism. So not only is he a Nazi sympathizer,
he's also a communist one.
Steve
david michael
Gord McFee wrote:
Well that would be a singularly silly thing for Comrade Kneisel to argue.
Maintaining that the term 'Holocaust' is too vague to be of use in serious
analysis is quite consistent with maintaining that existing interpretations of
the events of World War Two should be subjected to questioning.
However, I note that he's now been reduced to spamming and trolling so I expect
he isn't thinking too hard before hitting the 'send' button.
David
Cheryl
wrote:
>ron0...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
>: Your children are defective retards from a horrible
>: excuse for a mother. Once you realize that, maybe
>: you will actually start helping them instead of stuffing
>: your 300 pound face with more food pack rat.
>
> Hey, shit for brains!! Go fuck yourself!!
>
> Derek
But Derek you don't have a problem with posting just
as nasty shite about Bradbury. Why the hypocrisy, you
sniveling little whiner? Will you sue Tavish if you
bust a vein?
Cheryl
>The attacks against my children, as vile as it
>is, is a living, breathing example of the depths
>to which people can sink when Hate controls them.
>
>Sara
What about *your* bringing your poor father into AR
discussions simply because you are obsessed with
Tavish? Or *your* laughing at another persons
physical disability? Or *your* laughing about another
being overweight? Or *your* condoning a usenet
poster being harassed at his home? It just goes on
and on. Your hypocrisy may very well be your least
repulsive trait, Sara.
Sara
wrote:
> On 08 Dec 2000 15:38:23 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>
> >The attacks against my children, as vile as it
> >is, is a living, breathing example of the depths
> >to which people can sink when Hate controls them.
> >
> >Sara
>
> What about *your* bringing your poor father into AR
> discussions simply because you are obsessed with
> Tavish?
Once again, Brainless, I never brought my father into AR discussions.
You seem to forget that David Michael did. David Michael posted his
personal information, and Mr. Bradbury et al encouraged people to harass
him.
> Or *your* laughing at another persons
> physical disability?
I haven't laughed at ANYONE's disability, Brainless. You seem to forget
the attacks from Bradbury et al about my "retarded" son (who is not
retarded), and my children's "genetic" defects.
> Or *your* laughing about another
> being overweight?
I haven't laughed at ANYONE's being overweight, Brainless. You seem to
forget that it's Mr. Bradbury et al who consider making hog calls at me
as appropriate discussion, and who post altered photographs of me.
> Or *your* condoning a usenet
> poster being harassed at his home?
I haven't condoned ANYONE being harassed at home, Brainless. It was, in
fact, a photograph of _MY_ home that was posted on Yoderanium. It was,
in fact, _MY_ neighbors whose addresses and phone numbers were posted on
ar.
> It just goes on
> and on.
Yes it does. You've accused me of behaving in exactly the way your pals
have behaved. I have done none of the above, which can easily be
verified. You might even start with my response YESTERDAY to the person
calling himself "nazihunter" who posted personal information on Mr.
Bradbury. I condemned it, as I have consistently condemned ANY release
of personal information.
> Your hypocrisy may very well be your least
> repulsive trait, Sara.
>
Since there is no hypocrisy shown, I'd have to agree with you. However,
your _MOST_ repulsive trait is your personal attacks on me which have
absolutely no basis in fact.
Sara
> On 08 Dec 2000 15:38:23 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>
> >The attacks against my children, as vile as it
> >is, is a living, breathing example of the depths
> >to which people can sink when Hate controls them.
> >
> >Sara
>
> What about *your* bringing your poor father into AR
> discussions simply because you are obsessed with
> Tavish?
Once again, Brainless, I never brought my father into AR discussions.
You seem to forget that David Michael did. David Michael posted his
personal information, and Mr. Bradbury et al encouraged people to harass
him.
> Or *your* laughing at another persons
> physical disability?
I haven't laughed at ANYONE's disability, Brainless. You seem to forget
the attacks from Bradbury et al about my "retarded" son (who is not
retarded), and my children's "genetic" defects.
> Or *your* laughing about another
> being overweight?
I haven't laughed at ANYONE's being overweight, Brainless. You seem to
forget that it's Mr. Bradbury et al who consider making hog calls at me
as appropriate discussion, and who post altered photographs of me.
> Or *your* condoning a usenet
> poster being harassed at his home?
I haven't condoned ANYONE being harassed at home, Brainless. It was, in
fact, a photograph of _MY_ home that was posted on Yoderanium. It was,
in fact, _MY_ neighbors whose addresses and phone numbers were posted on
ar.
> It just goes on
> and on.
Yes it does. You've accused me of behaving in exactly the way your pals
have behaved. I have done none of the above, which can easily be
verified. You might even start with my response YESTERDAY to the person
calling himself "nazihunter" who posted personal information on Mr.
Bradbury. I condemned it, as I have consistently condemned ANY release
of personal information.
> Your hypocrisy may very well be your least
> repulsive trait, Sara.
>
Since there is no hypocrisy shown, I'd have to agree with you. However,
your _MOST_ repulsive trait is your personal attacks on me which have
absolutely no basis in fact.
Sara
david michael
Sara wrote:
> In article <911p6n$j93$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Cheryl <anti...@my-deja.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On 08 Dec 2000 15:38:23 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >The attacks against my children, as vile as it
> > >is, is a living, breathing example of the depths
> > >to which people can sink when Hate controls them.
> > >
> > >Sara
> >
> > What about *your* bringing your poor father into AR
> > discussions simply because you are obsessed with
> > Tavish?
>
> Once again, Brainless, I never brought my father into AR discussions.
Yes you did. You made highly defamatory claims about the mental health of Mr
Bradbury and claimed that you'd shown his posts to an eminent psychiatrist.
The psychiatrist in question turned out to be your dear old dad.
>
> You seem to forget that David Michael did.
I exposed your attempt to smear Mr Bradbury by telling the newsgroup what
you tried to hide: that the opinion you obtained on Mr Bradbury's mental
health was that of your father.
> David Michael posted his
> personal information,
Merely enough to illustrate that he was the person you had been writing
about.
> and Mr. Bradbury et al encouraged people to harass
> him.
>
> > Or *your* laughing at another persons
> > physical disability?
>
> I haven't laughed at ANYONE's disability, Brainless. You seem to forget
> the attacks from Bradbury et al about my "retarded" son (who is not
> retarded), and my children's "genetic" defects.
>
> > Or *your* laughing about another
> > being overweight?
>
> I haven't laughed at ANYONE's being overweight, Brainless. You seem to
> forget that it's Mr. Bradbury et al who consider making hog calls at me
> as appropriate discussion, and who post altered photographs of me.
>
> > Or *your* condoning a usenet
> > poster being harassed at his home?
>
> I haven't condoned ANYONE being harassed at home, Brainless. It was, in
> fact, a photograph of _MY_ home that was posted on Yoderanium. It was,
> in fact, _MY_ neighbors whose addresses and phone numbers were posted on
> ar.
>
Now this is interesting. I seem to recall reading somewhere that it was NOT
a photo of your home that was posted. Perhaps in the article in Westlife.
Were you lying to them, or are you lying to us?
>
> > It just goes on
> > and on.
>
> Yes it does. You've accused me of behaving in exactly the way your pals
> have behaved. I have done none of the above, which can easily be
> verified. You might even start with my response YESTERDAY to the person
> calling himself "nazihunter" who posted personal information on Mr.
> Bradbury. I condemned it, as I have consistently condemned ANY release
> of personal information.
>
Don't recall you condemning Morris for posting my real name and the place
where he thought I lived. Will you condemn it now? Yes or no, Ms S?
Don't recall you condemning Ken McVay for posting Grosvenor's personal
details. Will you condemn it now? Yes or no, Ms S?
Don't recall you condemning Edeiken for circulating Bradbury's personal
details. Will you condemn it now? Yes or no, Ms S?
<cue patter of tiny feet>
>
> > Your hypocrisy may very well be your least
> > repulsive trait, Sara.
> >
>
> Since there is no hypocrisy shown, I'd have to agree with you. However,
> your _MOST_ repulsive trait is your personal attacks on me which have
> absolutely no basis in fact.
>
> Sara
>
> --
> "It's always nice to see a prejudice overruled by a deeper prejudice."
> John Sayles, _Lone Star_
David
Jeffrey G. Brown
> On 08 Dec 2000 15:38:23 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >The attacks against my children, as vile as it
> >is, is a living, breathing example of the depths
> >to which people can sink when Hate controls them.
> >
> >Sara
>
> What about *your* bringing your poor father into AR
> discussions simply because you are obsessed with
> Tavish?
Sara did no such thing, bitch. Once again, that was David Michael.
JGB
================================================================== =====
Jeffrey G. Brown jg_b...@my-deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
jgɧrżwn@my-deja.com
<david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> Sara wrote:
> [...deletia...]
> > Once again, Brainless, I never brought my father into AR discussions.
>
> Yes you did.
You're lying, hamsterboy. You posted the name and address of Sara's father in a
clear attempt at intimidation.
> [...deletia...]
> > You seem to forget that David Michael did.
>
> I exposed your attempt to smear Mr Bradbury by telling the newsgroup what
> you tried to hide: that the opinion you obtained on Mr Bradbury's mental
> health was that of your father.
Thank you for admitting that you brought Sara's father into the discussion,
hamsterboy.
> > David Michael posted his
> > personal information,
>
> Merely enough to illustrate that he was the person you had been writing
> about.
You're lying, hamsterboy. You posted enough information for others to find
Sara's father and do him physical harm. It was clearly your intent to make that
possible.