JEWS MURDER JESUS !!
intp...@ecn.ab.ca
JEWS MURDER JESUS !!!
AND THE LORD GOD SAID UNTO ADAM
8 "And this sign, O Adam, will happen to Me
at My coming upon earth: Satan will raise the
people of the Jews to put Me to death; and they
will lay Me in a rock, and seal a large stone upon Me,
and I shall remain within that rock
three days and three nights."
9 "But on the third day I shall rise again,
and it shall be salvation to thee, O Adam,
and to thy seed to believe in Me. But, O Adam,
I will not bring thee from under this rock until
three days and three nights have passed."
THE FIRST BOOK OF ADAM AND EVE
chapter XLIX, verse eight and nine, Page 33.
THE FORGOTTEN BOOKS OF EDEN (Lost Books of the Old Testament.)
Bell Publishing
--
When evil is glorified as good, Any nation that tries to
and good vilified as evil, make its women men and its
Then the time of Satan is at hand. men women is doomed to
extinction !
Intphase
007
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
CuriousGeorge613
CuriousGeorge613
were Jews; and 2) the only secular source for Jesus' existence is Flavius
Josephus' *The Jewish War*, and he was a Jew also.
david.e.michael
CuriousGeorge613 wrote:
> News flash: Jesus a Jew!
Well since his father was presumably a non-human, he would at most have
been a half-Jew racially. And since he evidently believed in himself as
the son of God, he was hardly a Jew theologically. So in what sense was
he Jewish? (Assuming that he ever existed in the first place . . .)
David
Joseph Hertzlinger
<david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
>CuriousGeorge613 wrote:
>
>> News flash: Jesus a Jew!
>
>Well since his father was presumably a non-human, he would at most have
>been a half-Jew racially.
His mother was a Jew.
>And since he evidently believed in himself as
>the son of God,
Aren't we all God's children?
david.e.michael
Joseph Hertzlinger wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2000 06:31:36 +0100, david.e.michael
> <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >CuriousGeorge613 wrote:
> >
> >> News flash: Jesus a Jew!
> >
> >Well since his father was presumably a non-human, he would at most have
> >been a half-Jew racially.
>
> His mother was a Jew.
>
Yes, but his father wasn't.
>
> >And since he evidently believed in himself as
> >the son of God,
>
> Aren't we all God's children?
>
I suspect not.
David
CuriousGeorge613
"Well since his father was presumably a non-human, he would at most have
been a half-Jew racially. And since he evidently believed in himself as
the son of God, he was hardly a Jew theologically. So in what sense was
he Jewish? (Assuming that he ever existed in the first place . . .)"
First of all, as a Jew, I deny the divinity of Jesus and assume Joseph and Mary
to have both been Jews. But even for a Christian, given Jewish law that a
Jewish mother has Jewish babies, Jesus was Jewish.
Second, where in the New Testament does Jesus himself proclaim himself to be
the son of God?
And finally, if he wasn't Jewish, why did he go to Jerusalem for Passover, as
all Jews were commanded to do when the Temple stood there?
007
Curmudgeon
>
>
>JEWS MURDER JESUS !!!
>
>AND THE LORD GOD SAID UNTO ADAM
>
> 8 "And this sign, O Adam, will happen to Me
>at My coming upon earth: Satan will raise the
>people of the Jews to put Me to death; and they
>will lay Me in a rock, and seal a large stone upon Me,
>and I shall remain within that rock
>three days and three nights."
>
> 9 "But on the third day I shall rise again,
>and it shall be salvation to thee, O Adam,
>and to thy seed to believe in Me. But, O Adam,
>I will not bring thee from under this rock until
>three days and three nights have passed."
>
>
>THE FIRST BOOK OF ADAM AND EVE
>chapter XLIX, verse eight and nine, Page 33.
>THE FORGOTTEN BOOKS OF EDEN (Lost Books of the Old Testament.)
>Bell Publishing
The so-called "First Book of Adam and Eve" is a text of dubious origins in
comparison to the authentic Hebrew manuscripts which make up the Massoretic text
of the OT.
It is one of the many Pseudepigrapha (books falsely ascribed to biblical
authors) rejected by the early Church and the Jews alike as forgeries and/or
folk tales, although it seems a few ancient Jewish ascetic mystical and
apocalyptic sects (such as the Qumran community of the 1st century BC through
the 1st century AD) and pseudo-Christian Gnostic cults gave some credence to
some of them.
Based on the reseach done on the Dead Sea scrolls and other manuscripts found in
the Qumran area, at the earliest, the "Adam and Eve" books (there are at least
three) were written originally during the Babylonian conquest of Palestine,
though most likely much later, during the early Hellenist period --between 300
and 100 BC). They were also altered, mostly via glosses, many times for hundreds
of years afterward.
The "resurrection" verses you quote are regarded by biblical and Middle East
antiquities scholars as glosses added to the original text sometime during the
early Church period: They do not appear in all extant manuscripts, and are
completely absent in all manuscripts which pre-date Christ's life and death.
Therefore, as a source for biblical historical research, especially anything to
do with the life and death of Jesus, the so-called "First Book of Adam and Eve"
is essentially worthless. But it *is* very entertaining.
However, the only people who take it seriously today are New Agers, neopagans,
occultists, esoteric cults, and --it appears-- anti-Semitic kooks looking for a
free ride to "respectability."
The Curmudgeon
Lucas Stults
> JEWS MURDER JESUS !!!
Again!?! Will the horror never end?
Somehow, I forgot to killfile Racial Boy this time around. Lemme fix
that mistake right now.
-plonk-
William Daffer
> Joseph Hertzlinger wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 25 Apr 2000 06:31:36 +0100, david.e.michael
> > <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > >CuriousGeorge613 wrote:
> > >
> > >> News flash: Jesus a Jew!
> > >
> > >Well since his father was presumably a non-human, he would at most have
> > >been a half-Jew racially.
> >
> > His mother was a Jew.
> >
>
> Yes, but his father wasn't.
>
The determination is made on the status of the mother. Furthermore,
he considered himself such. He claimed that he was here to fullfill
Jewish prophecy and tradition. He consided himself a Jew. Jewish
authorities considered him a Jew. The Romans considered him a Jew.
So, it's pretty clear that Jesus was a Jews in most every way that
makes a difference, except the *social-scientific hermenuetical
sophistical*.
> >
> > >And since he evidently believed in himself as
> > >the son of God,
> >
> > Aren't we all God's children?
> >
>
> I suspect not.
>
But do you *know*. Your argument requires a decisive answer on this
matter.
> David
>
--
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
Groucho Marx.
Public Key: http://home.earthlink.net/~whdaffer/#PGP-public-key
Jeff
"david.e.michael" <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote in message
news:39054658...@variousisps.co.uk...
>
>
> Joseph Hertzlinger wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 25 Apr 2000 06:31:36 +0100, david.e.michael
> > <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > >CuriousGeorge613 wrote:
> > >
> > >> News flash: Jesus a Jew!
> > >
> > >Well since his father was presumably a non-human, he would at most have
> > >been a half-Jew racially.
> >
> > His mother was a Jew.
> >
>
> Yes, but his father wasn't.
>
Even if that WERE true, he would still have ended his life in a
concentration camp in WWII if he had lived in Europe at that time.
> >
> > >And since he evidently believed in himself as
> > >the son of God,
> >
> > Aren't we all God's children?
> >
>
> I suspect not.
>
You are a pessimist, aren't you?
Jeff
> David
>
CuriousGeorge613
James McColm
007 wrote:
>
> There was no Jesus, it is a story fabricated by Jews.
>
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
007 <xark007...@excite.co.uk.invalid> wrote in article
<026b91a0...@usw-ex0101-006.remarq.com>...
> There was no Jesus, it is a story fabricated by Jews.
>
Why would Jews write the following?
John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not
walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
John 20:19 "the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for
fear of the Jews"
2 Co 11:24 "Of the Jews five times recieved I forty stripes save one.
Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned"
Mathew 27: 20+25 "But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the
multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus...then answered
all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children."
Acts 25:24 "ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews have
dealt with me, both at Jerusalem and also here, crying that he ought not to
live any longer."
John 8:42,44,48 "Jesus said unto them...Ye are of your father the devil,
and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the
father of it...Then answered the Jews..."
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
William Daffer <whda...@earthlink.net> wrote in article
<m3zoqi1...@localhost.localdomain>...
> "david.e.michael" <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> writes:
> >
>
> The determination is made on the status of the mother. Furthermore,
> he considered himself such. He claimed that he was here to fullfill
> Jewish prophecy and tradition. He consided himself a Jew. Jewish
> authorities considered him a Jew. The Romans considered him a Jew.
>
> So, it's pretty clear that Jesus was a Jews in most every way that
> makes a difference, except the *social-scientific hermenuetical
> sophistical*.
Christ was an Israelite, but these were White people and not Jews.
The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews. Jews are
mostly Khazars and Edomites. These are races that adopted the religion of
Judaism and now they falsely claim to be Israelites.
Jews claim to be God's chosen people because they have the Jewish
religion. This proves nothing. People change their religion. The Edomites
and the Khazars became Jewish but they are not Israelites by race. The real
Israelites changed their religion and became Christians.
Christ said in Mathew 15:24 "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of
the house of Israel."
He came for the chosen race and sheep are a symbol for the chosen race, but
this is what He said to the Jews:
John 10:26+27 "But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I
said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me"
This means the real Israelites converted to Christianity. This
explains why Europe became known as Christendom.
The Israelites were direct descendants of Adam, who was the first
White man. The Hebrew word "adam" describes a White man. We are not the
color white like milk. We are a light skinned race and the light skin
allows blood, the color red to show in the cheeks. This is the definition
of the word "adam" in Strong's Concordance:
"to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:- be (dyed,
made) red (ruddy)."
This can only be describing a White man. Look at people today and see
which ones have rosy red cheeks. They are light skinned White people. The
Israelites were White.
The Bible says David was ruddy. This is the definition of the Hebrew
word "ruddy":
"reddish (of the hair or of the complexion):-red, ruddy."
David had rosy cheeks (or red hair) and did not look like a typical
Jew.
The Bible says the Israelites would be a blessing to the world. It
is the White race that invented all the great things and advanced
civilization on the earth.
The Bible tells us that the Jews are imposters.
Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and
are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
Many verses tell us that Jews are our enemies. Here is one example:
John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee; for he would not
walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
The Jews have been expelled from every Christian nation in Europe at
one time or another. Many people know that they are enemies of White
civilization. But not everyone knows the reason. It is because they are not
the chosen race and they hate those who really are the chosen race.
CuriousGeorge613
"Why would Jews write the following?"
Because they abandoned their religious heritage and no longer considered
themselves Jews.
"John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not
walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
Written by Yochanan bar Zebediah -- a Jew.
"John 20:19 "the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for
fear of the Jews"
Ditto
"2 Co 11:24 "Of the Jews five times recieved I forty stripes save one. Thrice
was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned"
Written by Shaul of Tarsus -- not only a Jew, but a Pharisee.
"Mathew 27: 20+25 "But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the
multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus...then answered all
the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children."
Mattityahu was also a Jew -- a Jewish tax collector. Reportedly, he was a
Levite.
"Acts 25:24 "ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews have
dealt with me, both at Jerusalem and also here, crying that he ought not to
live any longer."
This was written by St. Luke, who was not a Jew. Try to fact-check before
making a (bigger) idiot of yourself.
"John 8:42,44,48 "Jesus said unto them...Ye are of your father the devil,
and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning,
and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh
a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it...Then
answered the Jews..."
Once again, Yochanan bar Zebediah
CuriousGeorge613
"Christ was an Israelite, but these were White people and not Jews."
That's ridiculous. First of all, ten of Israel's twelve tribes had disappeared
by Jesus' time. Jesus was a Jew (a member of the tribe of Judah, as attested to
in Matthew and Luke's gospels) who celebrated Passover and spoke the Semitic
language Aramaic. If the Israelites were really "white," then how come no
"white" people speak Semitic languages?
"The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews. Jews are mostly Khazars
and Edomites. These are races that adopted the religion of Judaism and now they
falsely claim to be Israelites. "
1) The Edomite claim is prima facie riduculous. Edom is the seed of Esau.
Israelites are the seed of Jacob.
2) Even if it were true (and it isn't) that most Jews are Khazars, that doesn't
make them less Israelite than Semitic Jews. All who accept the Torah as binding
and halakhic are Jews, regardless of "race."
"Jews claim to be God's chosen people because they have the Jewish religion.
This proves nothing. People change their religion. The Edomites and the Khazars
became Jewish but they are not Israelites by race. The real Israelites changed
their religion and became Christians."
The Jewish religion is based on the Torah, which was written by Jews.
But tell us all -- when did the Edomites adopt Judaism. Be specific. Provide
dates and sources that may be checked.
Then tell us where in the Bible it mentions anything about "race" determining
one's Jewishness.
"Christ said in Mathew 15:24 "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the
house of Israel."
Right. He claimed to have come to those Jews who had lost their way.
"He came for the chosen race and sheep are a symbol for the chosen race"
If that's *your* race, I couldn't have said it better.
"but this is what He said to the Jews:
John 10:26+27 "But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I
said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me"
Perhaps you can show where Jesus delineates that this "sheep" reference has
something to do with "race."
"This means the real Israelites converted to Christianity. This explains why
Europe became known as Christendom."
So where did they get all those non-Semitic languages from?
"The Israelites were direct descendants of Adam, who was the first White man."
This means the world is 5759 years old, I guess?
"The Hebrew word "adam" describes a White man."
No. The words for "white man" in Hebrew are "adam lavan"
"We are not the color white like milk. We are a light skinned race and the
light skin allows blood, the color red to show in the cheeks. This is the
definition of the word "adam" in Strong's Concordance:
"to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:- be (dyed, made) red
(ruddy)."
And Strong was incorrect, confusing "adam" (man) with "adom" (red).
"This can only be describing a White man. Look at people today and see which
ones have rosy red cheeks. They are light skinned White people. The Israelites
were White."
Let me ask you this: Do Jews blush?
"The Bible says David was ruddy. This is the definition of the Hebrew word
"ruddy":
"reddish (of the hair or of the complexion):-red, ruddy."
Actually, I think you're talking about Esau. Where does the Bible describe
David as "ruddy."
"David had rosy cheeks (or red hair) and did not look like a typical Jew."
You've seen photos, then?
"The Bible says the Israelites would be a blessing to the world. It is the
White race that invented all the great things and advanced civilization on the
earth."
The White race wouldn't have algebra if it weren't for Semites.
"The Bible tells us that the Jews are imposters.
Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and
are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
You are a very poor reader of scripture. Clearly what Yochanan bar Zebediah,
the Jew, means here is that Jews who are not of pure spirit are not true Jews.
But tell me: Why does John say "Jews" and not "Israelites."
"Many verses tell us that Jews are our enemies. Here is one example:
John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee; for he would not
walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
Words written by a Jew, about a Jew, to justify your Jew-hate. Doesn't this
strike you as hypocritical?
"The Jews have been expelled from every Christian nation in Europe at one time
or another. Many people know that they are enemies of White civilization. But
not everyone knows the reason. It is because they are not the chosen race and
they hate those who really are the chosen race."
So all Jews hate all "white" people?
BTW, my Bible says "chosen people," not "chosen race." Can you cite the
scriptural reference(s) to race?
BTW (II): What do you make of God's striking of Miriam with leprosy for
criticizing Moses (an Israelite) for marrying a black women?
SuperMan
"jesus story" it's only a Xristós Mith ( Greco-Roman Mith ), boy... ;-)
--
Israel did not believe in Moses, our teacher, on account of the miracles he
performed. For when one’s faith is based on miracles, doubt remains in the
mind that these miracles may have been done through the occult and
witchcraft...
What then were the grounds of believing him? The revelation on Sinai which
we saw with our own eyes, and heard with our own ears, not having to depend
on the testimony of others... Mishna Torah -8:1
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
O SÍTIO DO HARIEH ->
http://homestead.virtualjerusalem.com/harieh/Sefarad.html
"007" <xark007...@excite.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:026b91a0...@usw-ex0101-006.remarq.com...
> There was no Jesus, it is a story fabricated by Jews.
>
mart
Intphase, but wasn't Jesus, a Jew? Secondly, by the standards of the
pro-deathies, he must have gotten what he deserved. After all, he had a
trial, was convicted of his "crimes" by a court and was judicially executed.
It's the first time ever, I've heard a pro deathy complaining about the
wrongfully convicted. I'm surprised that she's not cheering that justice
triumphed once again!
mart
intp...@ecn.ab.ca wrote in message <3905...@ecn.ab.ca>...
>
>JEWS MURDER JESUS !!!
>
>AND THE LORD GOD SAID UNTO ADAM
>
> 8 "And this sign, O Adam, will happen to Me
>at My coming upon earth: Satan will raise the
>people of the Jews to put Me to death; and they
>will lay Me in a rock, and seal a large stone upon Me,
>and I shall remain within that rock
>three days and three nights."
>
> 9 "But on the third day I shall rise again,
>and it shall be salvation to thee, O Adam,
>and to thy seed to believe in Me. But, O Adam,
>I will not bring thee from under this rock until
>three days and three nights have passed."
>
>
>THE FIRST BOOK OF ADAM AND EVE
>chapter XLIX, verse eight and nine, Page 33.
>THE FORGOTTEN BOOKS OF EDEN (Lost Books of the Old Testament.)
>Bell Publishing
>
>
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
Jeff <pitsar...@yahoo.com> wrote in article
<rwjN4.302$iU2....@news.uswest.net>...
>
> Even if that WERE true, he would still have ended his life in a
> concentration camp in WWII if he had lived in Europe at that time.
>
One of the points on the National Socialist party platform was that the
party was for positive Christianity. This is what it said:
"The party as such, stands for positive Christianity but does not bind
itself in the matter of creed to any particular confession."
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
" But all that I heard had the effect of arousing the strongest
antagonism in me. Everything was disparaged-the nation, because it was
held to be an invention of the 'capitalist' class (how often I had heard
that phrase!); the Fatherland, because it was held to be an instrument in
the hands of the bourgeosie for the exploitation of the working masses; the
authority of the law, because that was a means of holding down the
proletariat; religion, as a means of doping the people, so as to exploit
them afterward; morality, as a badge of stupid and sheepish docility. There
was nothing that they did not drag in the mud.
"At first I remained silent; but that could not last very long."
"And so I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with the
will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the Jew I am
defending the handiwork of the Lord."
"Was not the Press instrumental in bringing in a state of moral
degradation among our people? Were not morals and public decency made to
look ridiculous and classed as out-of-date and banal, until finally our
people also became modernized?"
"It must be noted too that the attack on the dogmatic principles
underlying ecclesiastical teaching increased steadily in violence. And yet
this human world of ours would be inconceivable without the practical
existance of a religious belief. The great masses of a nation are not
composed of philosophers. For the masses of the people, especially faith is
absolutely the only basis of a moral outlook on life."
"And the founder of Christianity made no secret indeed of His
estimation of the Jewish people. When He found it necessary He drove those
enemies of the human race out of the Temple of God"
"Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
secured. This was the press. The Jew exercised all his skill and tenacity
in getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began gradually to control
public life in its entirety."
Of religion he (the Jew) makes a mockery. Morality and decency are
described as anti-quated prejudices"
"Anyhow, the Jew has attained the ends he desired. Catholics and
Protestants are fighting with one another to their hearts content, while
the enemy of Aryan humanity and all Christendom is laughing up his sleeve."
"the Jew trafficked in the freedom of the nation and sold our country
to the masters of international high finance. So in our day he has
succeeded again, this time by raising ructions between the two German
religious denominations while the foundations on which both rest are being
eaten away and destroyed through the poison injected by the international
and cosmopolitan Jew."
"The most devoted Protestant could stand side by side with the most
devoted Catholic in our ranks"
"The National Socialist Movement must see to it that at least in our
own country the mortal enemy is recognized and that the fight against him
may be a beacon light pointing to a new and better period for other nations
as well as showing the way of salvation for Aryan humanity in the struggle
for its existance."
Here is part of a speech by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, delivered in
Nuernberg on September 13th, 1935 at the Seventh National-Socialist Party
Congress:
"Almost without exception, the intellectual leaders of Marxist atheism in
Germany were Jews, among them being Erich Weinert, Felix Abraham, Dr.
Levy-Lenz and others. At regular meetings, held in the presence of a notary
public, members were requested to register their declaration of withdrawal
from their church for a fee of 2 Marks. And this the fight for atheism was
carried on. Between 1918 and 1933 the withdrawals from the German
Evangelical Churches alone amounted to two-and-a-half million persons in
Germany. The programme which these atheistic societies laid down in regard
to sexual matters is amply charcterized in the following demands publicly
expressed at meetings and distributed in leaflet form:
1) The complete abrogation of the paragraphs of the law dealing with the
crime of abortion, and the right to have abortion procured free of charge
in State Hospitals.
2) Non-interference with prostitution.
3) The abrogation of all bourgeois-capitalistic regulations in regard to
marriage and divorce.
4) Official registration to be optional and the children to be educated by
the community.
5) Abrogation of all penalties for sexual perversities and amnesty to be
granted to all persons condemned as 'sexual criminals'.
"Truly a case of methodical insanity, which has for its aim the wilful
destruction of the nations and their civilization and the substitute of
barbarism as a fundamental principle of public life.
"Where are the men behind the scenes of this virulent world movement?
Who are the inventors of all this madness? Who transplanted this ensemble
into Russia and is today making the attempt to have it prevail in other
countries? The answer to these question discloses the actual secret of our
anti-Jewish policy and our uncomromising fight against Jewry; for the
Bolshevic International is in reality nothing less than a Jewish
International."
VOELKISCHER BEOBACHTER, 24 March 1933, Page 1
[Hitler's Speech at second meeting of the Reichstag of 1933, on
23 March 1933, asking for the adoption of the Enabling Act.]
"While the Government is determined to carry through the political and
moral purging of our public life, it is creating and insuring
prerequisites for a truly religious life. The Government sees in both
Christian confessions the most important factors for the maintenance of
our
folkdom. It will respect agreements concluded between them and the States.
However, it respects that its work will meet with a similar appreciation.
The Government will treat all other denominations with equal objective
justice.
It can never condone, though, that belonging to a certain denomination
or to a certain race might be regarded as a license to commit or tolerate
crimes. The Government will devote its care to the sincere living together
of Church and State."
Hitler said in a speech in Berlin on March 23, 1933 "The Reich
government sees in Christianity the unshakable foundation of the ethics and
morality of the folk."
Jeff
news:01bfb0a4$051a5480$298b4ad1@default...
>
> http://stormfront.org
>
> Jeff <pitsar...@yahoo.com> wrote in article
> <rwjN4.302$iU2....@news.uswest.net>...
> >
> > Even if that WERE true, he would still have ended his life in a
> > concentration camp in WWII if he had lived in Europe at that time.
> >
>
> One of the points on the National Socialist party platform was that the
> party was for positive Christianity. This is what it said:
>
> "The party as such, stands for positive Christianity but does not bind
> itself in the matter of creed to any particular confession."
>
<snip usual tail of crap>
That's neither here nor there. A Jew was viewed racially. It didn't matter
if you were a good practicing Christian (which Christ wasn't anyway), if you
were 1/4 Jewish you were axed. Period, do not pass go, do not collect $200.
Christ met this condition, and would therefore have died in a concentration
camp.
Jeff
Sara Salzman
<gmc...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>In <39054658...@variousisps.co.uk>, on Tue, 25 Apr 2000 08:16:41
>+0100, "david.e.michael" <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Joseph Hertzlinger wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 25 Apr 2000 06:31:36 +0100, david.e.michael
>> > <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> > >CuriousGeorge613 wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> News flash: Jesus a Jew!
>> > >
>> > >Well since his father was presumably a non-human, he would at most have
>> > >been a half-Jew racially.
>> >
>> > His mother was a Jew.
>>
>> Yes, but his father wasn't.
>
>Ah yes, another area about which David Michael is ignorant. The list is
>endless.
>
Not only that, but since when is David Michael able to tell us what
religion God is? How does he KNOW God isn't Jewish?
Sara
--
"I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
Edith Sitwell
$kr1p7...@tranquil.hegemony.ca
debate. There's nothing like a good 'Jews killed jesus' thread to encourage
a deluge of speculation-as-fact.
--
............................................................................
Exercise freedom of speech... but just be careful what you say.
............................................................................
www.geocities.com/pentagon/bunker/1022 swan_...@my-dejanews.com
Gord McFee
+0100, "david.e.michael" <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
> Joseph Hertzlinger wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 25 Apr 2000 06:31:36 +0100, david.e.michael
> > <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > >CuriousGeorge613 wrote:
> > >
> > >> News flash: Jesus a Jew!
> > >
> > >Well since his father was presumably a non-human, he would at most have
> > >been a half-Jew racially.
> >
> > His mother was a Jew.
>
> Yes, but his father wasn't.
Ah yes, another area about which David Michael is ignorant. The list is
endless.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Visit the Nizkor site
http://www.nizkor.org
Steve
Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> In article <sp0igsg6b515vbh2q...@4ax.com>, Gord McFee
> <gmc...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >In <39054658...@variousisps.co.uk>, on Tue, 25 Apr 2000 08:16:41
> >+0100, "david.e.michael" <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> Joseph Hertzlinger wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, 25 Apr 2000 06:31:36 +0100, david.e.michael
> >> > <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >CuriousGeorge613 wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> News flash: Jesus a Jew!
> >> > >
> >> > >Well since his father was presumably a non-human, he would at most have
> >> > >been a half-Jew racially.
> >> >
> >> > His mother was a Jew.
> >>
> >> Yes, but his father wasn't.
> >
> >Ah yes, another area about which David Michael is ignorant. The list is
> >endless.
> >
>
> Not only that, but since when is David Michael able to tell us what
> religion God is? How does he KNOW God isn't Jewish?
>
> Sara
Because David is the British version of Prof. Irwin Corey. He is the
world's foremost authority.
Steve
Kenneth McVay, OBC
Alex Vangel <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> One of the points on the National Socialist party platform was that the
>party was for positive Christianity. This is what it said:
To see what the National Socialists "said" about Christianity, see
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/imt/nca/nca-01/nca-01-07-means-30.html --
that's the entry into a litany of NAZI repression of the Christian
Church - none of which Mr. Vangel wants you to see.
I guess that's because it can't be found in Mein Babble....
--
The Nizkor Project - An electronic Holocaust educational resource
David Irving vrs. Deborah Lipstadt & Penguin Books Ltd: Judgment
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/i/irving-david/judgment-00-00.html
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/i/irving.david/libel.suit
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
mart <ma...@sgci.com> wrote in article
<Sv3O4.12779$HG1.3...@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
> First, and this may come as a shock to a good Christian bigot, like
> Intphase, but wasn't Jesus, a Jew?
No, He is an Israelite, and they are White people not Jews:
The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews. Jews are
mostly Khazars and Edomites. These are races that adopted the religion of
Judaism and now they falsely claim to be Israelites.
Jews claim to be God's chosen people because they have the Jewish
religion. This proves nothing. People change their religion. The Edomites
and the Khazars became Jewish but they are not Israelites by race. The real
Israelites changed their religion and became Christians.
Christ said in Mathew 15:24 "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of
the house of Israel."
He came for the chosen race and sheep are a symbol for the chosen race, but
this is what He said to the Jews:
John 10:26+27 "But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I
said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me"
This means the real Israelites converted to Christianity. This
explains why Europe became known as Christendom.
The Israelites were direct descendants of Adam, who was the first
White man. The Hebrew word "adam" describes a White man. We are not the
color white like milk. We are a light skinned race and the light skin
allows blood, the color red to show in the cheeks. This is the definition
of the word "adam" in Strong's Concordance:
"to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:- be (dyed,
made) red (ruddy)."
This can only be describing a White man. Look at people today and see
which ones have rosy red cheeks. They are light skinned White people. The
Israelites were White.
The Bible says David was ruddy. This is the definition of the Hebrew
word "ruddy":
"reddish (of the hair or of the complexion):-red, ruddy."
David had rosy cheeks (or red hair) and did not look like a typical
Jew.
The Bible says the Israelites would be a blessing to the world. It
is the White race that invented all the great things and advanced
civilization on the earth.
The Bible tells us that the Jews are imposters.
Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and
are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
Many verses tell us that Jews are our enemies. Here is one example:
John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee; for he would not
walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
The Jews have been expelled from every Christian nation in Europe at
William Daffer
> There is a massive ignorange of this event displayed by both sides of this
> debate. There's nothing like a good 'Jews killed jesus' thread to encourage
> a deluge of speculation-as-fact.
>
>
And your post adds nothing to either column.
<snip>
William
Kenneth McVay, OBC
Anti-White racist Alex Vangel <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews. Jews are
>mostly Khazars and Edomites. These are races that adopted the religion of
>Judaism and now they falsely claim to be Israelites.
These White folks you continue to insist are terminally stupid are the
CHOSEN people?
(Just when you think you've found a groovy diety, someone like Vangel
comes along and shows you how wrong you are.... who wants a god that
picks folks you insist are abysmally stupid and calls 'em "chosen?"
Really, folks, this is too much.)
Let me get this straight, Mr. Vangel.....
The Jews, you insist, control the media, isn't that correct? That
means you also believe and insist that White people are too stupid to
know what is true and what is not, and will thus swallow whatever some
Jewish "media" tells them to.
Da Joos are sounding pretty good right about now, given your praise of
them and damning of White people....
The Jews, you insist, control the monetary system, too, isn't that
correct? That means you also believe and insist that White people are
too stupid to control their own assets, and are ever at the moicy of
the Jews.
Da Joos are sounding pretty good right about now, given your praise of
them and damning of White people.
The Jews, you insist, control "the government," isn't that correct?
That means you also believe and insist that White people are too
stupid to govern themselves.
Da Joos are sounding pretty good right about now, given your praise of
them and damning of White people.
And, I must point out, you also believe that "The Jews" control
academia, isn't that correct? That means you also believe and insist
that White people are too stupid to educate themselves. In short, Mr.
Vangel, you are not only telling us that White people are stupid, but
that they are _so_ stupid they're going to STAY stupid!
You know what, Mr. Vangel?
I think the Jews are paying you to promote their interests. Your
admiration for them, which appears to be quite boundless, is the
ultimate giveaway.
Does David Duke know how much you hate Whites and praise Jews?
Is there twubble in paradise, Vangel?
--
The Nizkor Project - An electronic Holocaust educational resource
David Irving, Holocaust denial, and his connections to Right-Wing
Extremists and Neo-Nazism in Germany:
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/f/funke.hajo/irving-v-lipstadt
$kr1p7...@tranquil.hegemony.ca
> The Jews, you insist, control the media, isn't that correct? That
> means you also believe and insist that White people are too stupid to
> know what is true and what is not, and will thus swallow whatever some
> Jewish "media" tells them to.
People, in general, aren't stupid... but are usually too occupied with
day-to-day concerns to properly inform theirselves. Thus, many issues
must be taken on faith, from the 'authorities' in the media, most of who
represent corporate, or political interests.
If you're a little bit unclear on this, I can suggest some reading
for you, Ken.
--
............................................................................
"Forced counseling and "sensitivity training" are nothing more than
buzzwords for political re-education" -Letter in NYT imes (050200)
............................................................................
www.geocities.com/pentagon/bunker/1022 swan_...@my-dejanews.com
redrum
>
>In article <01bfb169$d80127a0$dd30e6cf@default>,
>Anti-White racist Alex Vangel <va...@i1.net> wrote:
>
>> The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews. Jews are
>>mostly Khazars and Edomites. These are races that adopted the religion
of
>>Judaism and now they falsely claim to be Israelites.
>
>These White folks you continue to insist are terminally stupid are the
>CHOSEN people?
>
>(Just when you think you've found a groovy diety, someone like Vangel
>comes along and shows you how wrong you are.... who wants a god that
>picks folks you insist are abysmally stupid and calls 'em "chosen?"
>Really, folks, this is too much.)
Fuck this chosen people shit, worship Buddha or Krishna. Or no god at
all. :)
Gord McFee
2000 23:36:43 EDT, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
> In article <sp0igsg6b515vbh2q...@4ax.com>, Gord McFee
> <gmc...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >In <39054658...@variousisps.co.uk>, on Tue, 25 Apr 2000 08:16:41
> >+0100, "david.e.michael" <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> Joseph Hertzlinger wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, 25 Apr 2000 06:31:36 +0100, david.e.michael
> >> > <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >CuriousGeorge613 wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> News flash: Jesus a Jew!
> >> > >
> >> > >Well since his father was presumably a non-human, he would at most have
> >> > >been a half-Jew racially.
> >> >
> >> > His mother was a Jew.
> >>
> >> Yes, but his father wasn't.
> >
> >Ah yes, another area about which David Michael is ignorant. The list is
> >endless.
> >
>
> Not only that, but since when is David Michael able to tell us what
> religion God is? How does he KNOW God isn't Jewish?
All he knows is filth.
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
Joseph Hertzlinger <jher...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in article
<8e3bh1$4ok$1...@slb7.atl.mindspring.net>...
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2000 06:31:36 +0100, david.e.michael
> <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
> His mother was a Jew.
No, she was an Israelite, and they were White people.
The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews. Jews are
mostly Khazars and Edomites. These are races that adopted the religion of
Judaism and now they falsely claim to be Israelites.
Jews claim to be God's chosen people because they have the Jewish
>
> Aren't we all God's children?
Jews are enemies of White Christian civilization.
Here are some quotes from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis Browne.
"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated in
the heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were neither
Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing Jews at all.
"For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there was
Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl Marx,
though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of Israel
than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born in Germany
in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not himself reared
as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized a Christian by his
father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him thoughout his days, for
he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two men
who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went thoughout Europe
in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being waged, whether
in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there the Jew was to be
found. It was little wonder that the enemies of social progress, the
monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of the whole liberal movement
as nothing but a Jewish plot."
"The Jews had become the money lenders of Europe for quite evident
reasons. The Church sternly forbade all Christians to engage in the
persuit...
"So the Jews became the money lenders of Europe. They developed a
great shrewdness and cunning in the one and only field of opportunity left
open to them. And with their shrewdness and cunning they developed a
certain cruelty and greed. That was natural. The world was cruel to them,
so when the chance was theirs, they were cruel in return..."
Jeff
(at least not answering them) and still continue to REPOST the same old
garbage. Seriously, when was the last time you actually wrote something
new?
Jeff
"Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote in message
news:01bfb298$662a8920$673ae6cf@default...
intp...@ecn.ab.ca
: >JEWS MURDER JESUS !!!
: >
: >AND THE LORD GOD SAID UNTO ADAM
: >
: > 8 "And this sign, O Adam, will happen to Me
: >at My coming upon earth: Satan will raise the
: >people of the Jews to put Me to death; and they
: >will lay Me in a rock, and seal a large stone upon Me,
: >and I shall remain within that rock
: >three days and three nights."
: >
: > 9 "But on the third day I shall rise again,
: >and it shall be salvation to thee, O Adam,
: >and to thy seed to believe in Me. But, O Adam,
: >I will not bring thee from under this rock until
: >three days and three nights have passed."
: >
: >
: >THE FIRST BOOK OF ADAM AND EVE
: >chapter XLIX, verse eight and nine, Page 33.
: >THE FORGOTTEN BOOKS OF EDEN (Lost Books of the Old Testament.)
: >Bell Publishing
: The so-called "First Book of Adam and Eve" is a text of dubious origins in
: comparison to the authentic Hebrew manuscripts which make up the Massoretic text
: of the OT.
: It is one of the many Pseudepigrapha (books falsely ascribed to biblical
: authors) rejected by the early Church and the Jews alike as forgeries and/or
: folk tales, although it seems a few ancient Jewish ascetic mystical and
: apocalyptic sects (such as the Qumran community of the 1st century BC through
: the 1st century AD) and pseudo-Christian Gnostic cults gave some credence to
: some of them.
Of course Jews wouldn't like it.
It speaks of Jesus the saviour.
And how Satan beguiles the Jews.
Repent and accept Jesus.
: However, the only people who take it seriously today
are New Agers, neopagans,: occultists, esoteric cults,
and --it appears-- anti-Semitic kooks looking for a
: free ride to "respectability."
And God and Christians.
intp...@ecn.ab.ca
: > JEWS MURDER JESUS !!!
: Again!?! Will the horror never end?
: Somehow, I forgot to killfile Racial Boy this time around. Lemme fix
: that mistake right now.
: -plonk-
You want to killfile God ??
Kenneth McVay, OBC
Alex Vangel <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> No, she was an Israelite, and they were White people.
Ah! The ones you keep insisting are so stupid, right?
> The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews. Jews are
>mostly Khazars and Edomites. These are races that adopted the religion of
>Judaism and now they falsely claim to be Israelites.
Wow.. these the same "Jews" that are more capable of running
governments than the White folks are?
The same "Jews" that control the money supply because White folks are
too stupid to figure it out?
The same "Jews" that control the media because White folks are too
stupid to invest capital and operate media companies?
The same "Jews" that "control Academia" because White folks are too
stupid to provide themselves with an education?
That them Joos you're talking about, Mr. Vangel? The ones that run the
world while these stupid White people sit around on their duffs and do
nothing?
These the same Jews you're promoting so well?
Them Jews?
Why do you bad-mouth White people, Vangel? You hate them, or what?
--
The Nizkor Project - An electronic Holocaust educational resource
m. brazeau
>
> http://stormfront.org
>
> William Daffer <whda...@earthlink.net> wrote in article
> <m3zoqi1...@localhost.localdomain>...
> > "david.e.michael" <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> writes:
> > >
> >
> > The determination is made on the status of the mother. Furthermore,
> > he considered himself such. He claimed that he was here to fullfill
> > Jewish prophecy and tradition. He consided himself a Jew. Jewish
> > authorities considered him a Jew. The Romans considered him a Jew.
> >
> > So, it's pretty clear that Jesus was a Jews in most every way that
> > makes a difference, except the *social-scientific hermenuetical
> > sophistical*.
>
>
>
> mostly Khazars and Edomites. These are races that adopted the religion of
> Judaism and now they falsely claim to be Israelites.
>
> religion. This proves nothing. People change their religion. The Edomites
> and the Khazars became Jewish but they are not Israelites by race. The
real
> Israelites changed their religion and became Christians.
>
So what you are saying is that, after the Jews were thrown out of
Palestine, they all converted to Christianity. Then these Khazars converted
to Judaism, went back in time, and formed a diaspora all over Europe from
around 70AD onward (unless you can explain in some other way all those
Jewish communites throughout the Roman empire). Interesting theory.
> Christ said in Mathew 15:24 "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of
> the house of Israel."
>
> He came for the chosen race and sheep are a symbol for the chosen race,
but
> this is what He said to the Jews:
>
> John 10:26+27 "But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I
> said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow
me"
>
> This means the real Israelites converted to Christianity. This
> explains why Europe became known as Christendom.
>
No, the fact that the continent was converted by various means over a
1400 year period explains why it was eventually known as Christendom.
> The Israelites were direct descendants of Adam, who was the first
> White man. The Hebrew word "adam" describes a White man. We are not the
> color white like milk. We are a light skinned race and the light skin
> allows blood, the color red to show in the cheeks. This is the definition
> of the word "adam" in Strong's Concordance:
>
> "to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:- be (dyed,
> made) red (ruddy)."
>
> This can only be describing a White man. Look at people today and
see
> which ones have rosy red cheeks. They are light skinned White people. The
> Israelites were White.
>
Ever seen an Arab blush? It shows up quite nicely. Same goes for the
vast majority of blacks, as well as Chinese, Mohawks, Australian aborigines,
and so on. Thanks, you have now proven that when people blush they turn
red. What a gift to science.
> The Bible says David was ruddy. This is the definition of the Hebrew
> word "ruddy":
>
> "reddish (of the hair or of the complexion):-red, ruddy."
>
> David had rosy cheeks (or red hair) and did not look like a typical
> Jew.
>
You have little experience with people from western Asia. Very many are
light skinned, very many have lighter hair than others, some even reddish.
Humans are *quite* variable. You should travel more. Get out, see the
world.
> The Bible says the Israelites would be a blessing to the world. It
> is the White race that invented all the great things and advanced
> civilization on the earth.
>
China? Japan? The Khmers? Great Zimbabwe? Egypt? Sumer? Babylon?
The mound builders?
Various civilizations in India? Various Arab civilizations which still
valued learning during our own 'dark ages'? The Inca? The Mayans?
Etc, etc.
> The Bible tells us that the Jews are imposters.
>
> Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and
> are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
>
> Many verses tell us that Jews are our enemies. Here is one example:
>
> John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee; for he would not
> walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
>
> The Jews have been expelled from every Christian nation in Europe at
> one time or another. Many people know that they are enemies of White
> civilization. But not everyone knows the reason. It is because they are
not
> the chosen race and they hate those who really are the chosen race.
>
Christians have been expelled in large numbers from every nation of
Europe at one time or another. It all came down to whether they were 'True
Christians' (Calvinists, Lutherans, Catholics, etc.) or 'True Christians'
(Calvinists, Lutherans, Catholics, etc.). But not everyone knows the
reason. It is because people like to gather together in granfaloons, and
act brutally toward those who are not included.
--
"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence."
David Hume (1711-1776)
Yoni Rosenzweig
Jews killed Jesus.\
Hey, ignoramus: Jesus was a fucking Jew, and all the people arounf him too.
and answer me this, you human spitoon, if the Jews DIDN'T kill jesus, then
who would have died
for your sins? you know, hatred of your fellow man, jealousy, suspicion.
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
m. brazeau <mb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in article
> So what you are saying is that, after the Jews were thrown out of
> Palestine, they all converted to Christianity.
The great majority of Israelites were taken into captivity. Only a
small minority returned to Palestine and became known as Jews. Many of
these believed in Christ and became Christians. The Jews of today are
descended from the enemies of Christ.
Then these Khazars converted
> to Judaism, went back in time, and formed a diaspora all over Europe from
> around 70AD onward (unless you can explain in some other way all those
> Jewish communites throughout the Roman empire). Interesting theory.
The Edomites also became Jews and they became Jews in 100 BC
Encyclopedia Americana 1956
"HYRCANUS...John....a Jewish high priest...he next overcame the Idumaeans
and obliged them to submit to Judaism."
"Idumaean" is Greek for Edomite. The Edomites became Jews in 100 BC and
are known as Jews today.
> >
> > "to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:- be (dyed,
> > made) red (ruddy)."
> >
> > This can only be describing a White man. Look at people today and
> see
> > which ones have rosy red cheeks. They are light skinned White people.
The
> > Israelites were White.
> >
>
>
> Ever seen an Arab blush? It shows up quite nicely. Same goes for the
> vast majority of blacks, as well as Chinese, Mohawks, Australian
aborigines,
> and so on. Thanks, you have now proven that when people blush they turn
> red. What a gift to science.
>
There are people who fit the description "to show blood in the face".
Pictures of the fictional Santa Clause fit it for example.The people that
fit the description are White.
>
> > The Bible says David was ruddy. This is the definition of the
Hebrew
> > word "ruddy":
> >
> > "reddish (of the hair or of the complexion):-red, ruddy."
> >
> > David had rosy cheeks (or red hair) and did not look like a
typical
> > Jew.
> >
>
> You have little experience with people from western Asia. Very many
are
> light skinned, very many have lighter hair than others, some even
reddish.
> Humans are *quite* variable. You should travel more. Get out, see the
> world.
>
> > The Bible says the Israelites would be a blessing to the world.
It
> > is the White race that invented all the great things and advanced
> > civilization on the earth.
> >
>
> China?
Indo-European: The Mummies of Xinjiang
The Mummies of Xinjiang
In the dry hills of this central Asian province, archeologist have
unearthed more than 100 corpses hat are as much s 4,000 years old.
Astonishingly well preserved - and Caucasian.
One glimpse of the corpses was enough to shock Victor Mair profoundly.
In 1987, Mair, a professor of Chinese at the University of Pennsylvania,
was leading a tour group through a museum in the Chinese city of Urumqi, in
the central Asian province of Xinjiang, when he accidentally strayed into
gloomy, newly opened room. There, under glass, lay the recently
discovered corpses of a family - a man, a woman, and a child of two or
three - each clad in long, dark purple woolen garments and felt boots. Even
today I get chills thinking about that first encounter," says Mair. "The
Chinese said they were 3,000 years old, yet the bodies looked as if they
were buried yesterday."
But the real shock came when Mair looked closely at their faces. In
contrast to most central Asian peoples,these corpses had obvious Caucasian,
or European, features - blond hair, long noses, deep-set eyes, and long
skulls."I was thunderstruck," Mair recalls. "Even though I was supposed
to be leading a tour group, I just couldn't leave that room. The questions
kept nagging at me: Who were these people? How did they get out here at
such an early date?"
The corpses Mair saw that day were just a few of more than 100 dug up by
Chinese archeologists over the past 16 years. All of them are astonishingly
well preserved.They come from four major burial sites scattered between
the arid foothills of the Tian Shan ("Celestial Mountains") in northwest
China and the fringes of the The Taklimakan Desert, some 150 miles due
south. All together, these bodies,dating from about 2000 B.C. to 300 B.C.,
constitute significant addition to the world's catalog of prehistoric
mummies. Unlike the roughly contemporaneous mummies of ancient Egypt, the
Xinjiang mummies were not ruler or nobles; they were not interred in
pyramids or other such monuments,nor were they subjected to deliberate
mummification procedures.
They were preserved merely by being buried in the parched, stony desert,
where daytime temperatures often soar over 100 degrees. In the heat the
bodies were quickly dried, with facial hair, skin, and other tissues
remaining largely intact.
Where exactly did these apparent Caucasians come from? And what were
they doing at remote desert oases in central Asia?
Any answers to these questions will most likely fuel a wide-ranging
debate about the role outsiders played in the rise of Chinese civilization.
As far back as the second century B.C., Chinese texts refer to alien
peoples called the Yuezhi and the Wusun, who lived on China's far western
borders; the texts make it clear that these people were regarded as
troublesome "barbarians." Until recently, scholars have tended to downplay
evidence of any early trade or contact between China and the West,
regarding the development of Chinese civilization as an essentially
homegrown affair scaled off from outside influences; indeed, this view is
still extremely congenial to the present Chinese regime. Yet some
archeologists have begun to argue that these supposed barbarians might have
been responsible for introducing into China such basic items as the wheel
and the first metal objects. Exactly who these central Asian outsiders
might have been, however what language they spoke and where they came from
- is a puzzle. No wonder, then, that scholars see the discovery of the
blond mummies as a sensational new clue...
Most researchers now think the birthplace of horsedrawn vehicles and horse
riding was in the steppes east and west of the Urals rather than in China
or the Near East. As archeologist David Anthony and his colleagues have
shown through microscopic study of ancient horse teeth, horses were already
being harnessed in the Ukraine 6,000 years ago. The Ukraine horses, Anthony
found, show a particular kind of tooth wear identical to that of modern
horses that "fight the bit." The world's earliest high-status vehicles also
seem to have originated in the steppes; recent discoveries of wooden
chariots with elaborate spoked wheels were reported by Anthony to date to
around 2000 B.C. Chariots do not seem to have appeared in China until some
800 years later...
had wagons and well-tailored clothes. Were they mere goat and
sheep farmers? Or did they profit from or even control prehistoric trade
along the route that later became the Silk Road? If so, they probably
helped spread the first wheels and certain metalworking skills into China.
"Ultimately I think our project may end up having tremendous implications
for the origins of Chinese civilization," Mair reflects. "For all their
incredible inventiveness, the ancient Chinese weren't cut off from the
rest of the world, and influences didn't just flow one way, from China
westward."
Unfortunately, economics dictates that answers will be slow in coming.
The Chinese have the money to spare for this work, and Wang and his team
continue to operate on a shoestring. Currently most of the corpses and
artifacts are stored in a damp, crowded basement room at the Institute
of Archeology in Urumqi, in conditions that threaten their continued
preservation. If Mair's plans for a museum can be financed with Western
help, perhaps the mummies can be moved. Then, finally, they'll receive
the study and attention that will ultimately unlock their secrets.
>Japan?
They are advanced because they are the lightest color of the Asian
people. The people in India are much darker and in India they are very
poor.
The Khmers? Great Zimbabwe?
A myth.
> Egypt?
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops, the
builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs of her
tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a bright yellow
stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin is white."
Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan.
1939, p.98
The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in
Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.
Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971, p.249
The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8
"A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a vivid
blue-green color of eyes.
A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the the British
Museam. London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49
The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.
Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch, N.Y. 1972 p.68
Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.
Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of
Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt, Journal of the
Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII, 1889,
p.216
The mummy of Rameses II has fine silky yellow hair.
Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R. Egyptian Mummies, London, George
Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924 p.99
A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored
ones.
De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899, p.26
Amenhotep III's tomb painting shows him as having light red hair.
National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its Splendors,1978
p.103
An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.
Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma,
University of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53
A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called Wedjat
Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue" in
Egyptian.
Queen Thi is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and blond
hair.
Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil" Bulletin de la Societe
d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739
Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red hair
and blue eyes.
Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932, plate
XI
The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.
Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne, Marseille, Musee Boreby,
1973 p.94
A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking man
with blond hair.
Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient
Egypt. New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65
Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The Great.
It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another picture can
be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the picture on the
jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.
A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published showing
paintings,scuptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading personalities
of Ancient Egypt. Of these, 102 appear European, 13 look black and the rest
are hard to classify. All nine mummies look European.
The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very
European, The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed the
Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the face of
the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books Alexandria, VA 1992 p.67
It was once painted sunburned red.
Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt N.Y., N.Y., T. Nelson
1971 p.168
The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper class
women as white; this because the men became sunburned or tanned while
outside under the burning Egyptian sun.
The information above is part of the information compiled by Phillip
Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street, SE,
Washington, D.C. 20003
Sumer? Babylon?
> The mound builders?
> Various civilizations in India? Various Arab civilizations which still
> valued learning during our own 'dark ages'?
Whites
The Inca? The Mayans?
Their legends say that "white Gods" came and taught them everything.
> Etc, etc.
>
>
> Christians have been expelled in large numbers from every nation of
> Europe at one time or another. It all came down to whether they were
'True
> Christians' (Calvinists, Lutherans, Catholics, etc.) or 'True Christians'
> (Calvinists, Lutherans, Catholics, etc.). But not everyone knows the
> reason. It is because people like to gather together in granfaloons, and
> act brutally toward those who are not included.
>
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
Sam Barber
"Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
>
> http://stormfront.org:
Providing Refuge from Truth and Reason since 1995
> m. brazeau <mb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in article
> > So what you are saying is that, after the Jews were thrown out of
> > Palestine, they all converted to Christianity.
> The great majority of Israelites were taken into captivity. Only a
> small minority returned to Palestine and became known as Jews. Many of
> these believed in Christ and became Christians.
Therefore Jews are white.
> The Jews of today are descended from the enemies of Christ.
Herr Vange has shown us to be an enemy of Christ. He believes
it is ok to kill some white, Christian children.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
mxy...@my-deja.com
"Yoni Rosenzweig" <yon...@sas.uepnn.edu> wrote:
> I enjoy the fact that those who support Capital Punishment also think
that
> Jews killed Jesus.\
>
> Hey, ignoramus: Jesus was a fucking Jew, and all the people arounf
him too.
How could a mythical character who never truly existed be a Jew or
anything else for that matter? I understand your point, but there is
as much historical evidence to support the existance of the so called
"jesus" as there is to support the historical existance of "zeus" or
"the mighty thor" and so on.
The idiots you are arguing with are psychotic hatemongers, not worth
your time or mine. However, you should know that the "jesus" myth
accepted as a given (with different interpretations) by billions of
people is simply not true. Aside from internal contradictions of the
xtian's own "new" testament, the story from a common sense point of
view is total nonsense. The early church felt so vulnerable on this
point that they had to create much pseudographia, insert passages into
Josephus, etc....
Best Wishes
> and answer me this, you human spitoon, if the Jews DIDN'T kill jesus,
then
> who would have died
> for your sins? you know, hatred of your fellow man, jealousy,
suspicion.
>
>
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
Sam Barber <SamB...@prontomail.com> wrote in article
<8elbmi$imf$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
> In article <01bfb3c1$93d2f7c0$3e8b4ad1@default>,
> "Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> >
>
> > > So what you are saying is that, after the Jews were thrown out of
> > > Palestine, they all converted to Christianity.
>
> > The great majority of Israelites were taken into captivity. Only a
> > small minority returned to Palestine and became known as Jews. Many of
> > these believed in Christ and became Christians.
>
> Therefore Jews are white.
Technically Jews are white but they are not considered one of us
because they are known enemies of our civilization.
>
> > The Jews of today are descended from the enemies of Christ.
>
> Herr Vange has shown us to be an enemy of Christ. He believes
> it is ok to kill some white, Christian children.
>
>
Sam Barber has shown that he believes that the enemies of Christ are the
people who believe in the Bible.
Deuteronomy 21:18-21
"If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the
voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have
chastened him, will not hearken unto them: Then shall his father and his
mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of the city, and
unto the gate of his place; And they shall say unto the elders of his city,
This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he
is a glutton, and a drunkard. And all the men of his city shall stone him
with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and
all Israel shall hear, and fear."
Sam Barber
Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> http://stormfront.org:
Providing Refuge from Truth and Reason since 1995
> Sam Barber <SamB...@prontomail.com> wrote in article
> <8elbmi$imf$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>> In article <01bfb3c1$93d2f7c0$3e8b4ad1@default>, "Alex
>> Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
>>> The great majority of Israelites were taken into
>>> captivity. Only a small minority returned to Palestine
>>> and became known as Jews. Many of these believed in
>>> Christ and became Christians.
>> Therefore Jews are white.
> Technically Jews are white but they are not considered
> one of us because they are known enemies of our
> civilization.
They are either white or not white. You have admitted they
are white. Since Jews are not enemies of civilaztion nor
enemies of themselves, but contribute enormously to it, you
assertion is ridiculous and invalid. But, then, so are you,
Herr Vange.
>> The Jews of today are descended from the enemies of
>> Christ.
>> Herr Vange has shown us to be an enemy of Christ. He
>> believes it is ok to kill some white, Christian
>> children.
> Sam Barber has shown that he believes that the enemies of
> Christ are the people who believe in the Bible.
No, I have done nothing but allow you to show yourself as
an enemy of Christ, an enemy of the Bible, an enemy of the
Constitution, and an enemy of the civilized world.
Are you do delusional to think otherwise, Herr Vange?
Jeff
Jeff
"Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote in message
news:01bfb420$53307120$823ae6cf@default...
>
> http://stormfront.org
>
> Sam Barber <SamB...@prontomail.com> wrote in article
> <8elbmi$imf$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
> > In article <01bfb3c1$93d2f7c0$3e8b4ad1@default>,
> > "Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > > So what you are saying is that, after the Jews were thrown out of
> > > > Palestine, they all converted to Christianity.
> >
> > > The great majority of Israelites were taken into captivity. Only a
> > > small minority returned to Palestine and became known as Jews. Many of
> > > these believed in Christ and became Christians.
> >
> > Therefore Jews are white.
>
> Technically Jews are white but they are not considered one of us
> because they are known enemies of our civilization.
>
>
> > > The Jews of today are descended from the enemies of Christ.
> >
> > Herr Vange has shown us to be an enemy of Christ. He believes
> > it is ok to kill some white, Christian children.
> >
> >
> Sam Barber has shown that he believes that the enemies of Christ are
the
> people who believe in the Bible.
>
Kenneth McVay, OBC
Alex Vangel <va...@i1.net> wrote:
[pimping for an ex-convict's racist garbage]
> Technically Jews are white but they are not considered one of us
>because they are known enemies of our civilization.
Mr. Vangel freely admits that White nations are the best nations.
Mr. Vangel freely asserts that Jews run these nations.
Mr. Vangel freely asserts that Jews control the media, the schools,
and the monetary systems of these nations.
Now, having admitted the Jews made these nations what they are, he
damns them as "known enemies."
This may be confusing to those with little or no experience dealing
with the dual-neuron model of boneheaded Identity adherents, who might
wonder how a man who devotes much of his life to praising Jews and
damning Whites for being stupid can function, but there it is..
Just think what Mr. Vangel might accomplish with _three_ neurons!
David Christian
>In article <01bfb420$53307120$823ae6cf@default>,
>Alex Vangel <va...@i1.net> wrote:
>
>[pimping for an ex-convict's racist garbage]
>
>> Technically Jews are white but they are not considered one of us
>>because they are known enemies of our civilization.
>
>Mr. Vangel freely admits that White nations are the best nations.
>Mr. Vangel freely asserts that Jews run these nations.
>Mr. Vangel freely asserts that Jews control the media, the schools,
>and the monetary systems of these nations.
>Now, having admitted the Jews made these nations what they are, he
>damns them as "known enemies."
>
>This may be confusing to those with little or no experience dealing
>with the dual-neuron model of boneheaded Identity adherents, who might
>wonder how a man who devotes much of his life to praising Jews and
>damning Whites for being stupid can function, but there it is..
>
>Just think what Mr. Vangel might accomplish with _three_ neurons!
With three, he might be at least as bright as Cuddles.
m. brazeau
>
> http://stormfront.org
>
> m. brazeau <mb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in article
> > So what you are saying is that, after the Jews were thrown out of
> > Palestine, they all converted to Christianity.
>
> The great majority of Israelites were taken into captivity. Only a
> small minority returned to Palestine and became known as Jews. Many of
> these believed in Christ and became Christians. The Jews of today are
> descended from the enemies of Christ.
>
It's impressive what sorts of pseudo-historical theories can be created
when one is not obliged to produce any sort of evidence. Yes, that is a
challenge.
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
Yoni Rosenzweig <yon...@sas.uepnn.edu> wrote in article
<8ekn9o$4s8$1...@netnews.upenn.edu>...
> I enjoy the fact that those who support Capital Punishment also think
that
> Jews killed Jesus.\
>
> Hey, ignoramus: Jesus was a fucking Jew, and all the people arounf him
too
No, He was an Israelite and they were White people, not Jews.
The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews. Jews are
mostly Khazars and Edomites. These are races that adopted the religion of
Judaism and now they falsely claim to be Israelites.
Jews claim to be God's chosen people because they have the Jewish
religion. This proves nothing. People change their religion. The Edomites
and the Khazars became Jewish but they are not Israelites by race. The real
Israelites changed their religion and became Christians.
Christ said in Mathew 15:24 "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of
the house of Israel."
He came for the chosen race and sheep are a symbol for the chosen race, but
this is what He said to the Jews:
John 10:26+27 "But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I
said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me"
This means the real Israelites converted to Christianity. This
explains why Europe became known as Christendom.
The Israelites were direct descendants of Adam, who was the first
White man. The Hebrew word "adam" describes a White man. We are not the
color white like milk. We are a light skinned race and the light skin
allows blood, the color red to show in the cheeks. This is the definition
of the word "adam" in Strong's Concordance:
"to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:- be (dyed,
made) red (ruddy)."
This can only be describing a White man. Look at people today and see
which ones have rosy red cheeks. They are light skinned White people. The
Israelites were White.
The Bible says David was ruddy. This is the definition of the Hebrew
word "ruddy":
"reddish (of the hair or of the complexion):-red, ruddy."
David had rosy cheeks (or red hair) and did not look like a typical
Jew.
The Bible says the Israelites would be a blessing to the world. It
is the White race that invented all the great things and advanced
civilization on the earth.
The Bible tells us that the Jews are imposters.
Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and
are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
Many verses tell us that Jews are our enemies. Here is one example:
John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee; for he would not
walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
The Jews have been expelled from every Christian nation in Europe at
one time or another. Many people know that they are enemies of White
civilization. But not everyone knows the reason. It is because they are not
the chosen race and they hate those who really are the chosen race.
.
>
> and answer me this, you human spitoon, if the Jews DIDN'T kill jesus,
then
> who would have died
> for your sins? you know, hatred of your fellow man, jealousy, suspicion.
>
You have your beliefs because your only source of information is the
Jewish controlled media:
There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of Their
Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran Hollywood.
Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment". It is
subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are from the Aug
1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So What?":
"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power
and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential
pruduction executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a
heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."
"the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt Disney,
a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic attitudes, now
features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions."
The head of Walt Disney studios is now the Jew Michael Eisner. On
studios that were bought out by the Japanese the magazine says:
"When Mitsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to undermine the
unquestioned authority of Universal's legendary - and all Jewish -
management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg, and Tom Pollack."
Here are some quotes from the paper "Jews Control the Media and
Rule America"
"American Broadcasting Companies (ABC), Coumbia Broadcasting System
(CBS), and National Broadcasting Company (NBC). Each of these three has
been under the absolute control of a single man over a long enough period
of time--ranging from 32 to 55 years--for him to staff the corporation at
every level with officers of his choosing and then to place his imprint
indelibly upon it. In each case that man has been a Jew.
"Until 1985, when ABC merged with Capital Cities Communications,
Inc...the chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer
(CEO) of the network was Leonard Harry Goldenson, a Jew...In an interview
in the April 1, 1985 issue of Newsweek, Goldenson boasted 'I built this
company (ABC) from scratch.'"
"CBS was under the domination of William S. Paley for more than half
a century. The son of immigrant Jews from Russia..."
"There has been no move by top G-E management to change the Jewish
"profile" of NBC or to replace key Jewish personel. To the contrary, new
Jewish executives have been added: an example is Steve Friedman..."
"The man in charge of the television entertainment division at CBS is
Jeff Sagansky. At ABC the entertainment division is run by two
men....nearly all of the men who shape young Amercians' concept of reality,
of good and evil, of permissible and impermissible behavior are Jews. In
particular, Sagansky and Bloomberg arre Jews. So is Tartikoff. Littlefield
is the only Gentile who has had a significant role in TV entertainment
programming in recent years."
"American Film magazine listed the top 10...entertainment companies
and their CEOs...Time Warner Communications (Steven J Ross, Jew) Walt
Disney Co. (Michael D. Eisner, Jew)...Of the 10 top entertainment CEOs
listed above, eight are Jews."
"The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than a lack of
real competition among America's daily newspapers; it also illustrates the
insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all organs of opinion... The
Newhouse's own 31 daily newspapers, including several large and important
ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the
New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation's largest trade book publishing
conglomerate, Random House, with all its subsideries; Newhouse
Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87
cable-TV systems, including some of the countries largest cable networks-
the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more than 22 million
copies per week; some two dozen major magazines, including the New Yorker,
Vogue, Madamoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, HQ, Bride's, Gentlemen's
Quarterly, Self, Home&Garden...."
"Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and
management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising..."
"the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington
Post. These three...are the newspapers which set trends and guidlines for
nearly all others. They are the ones which decide what is news and what
isn't, at national and international levels. They originate the news; the
others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands...The
Suzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co. 36 other
newspapers; twelve magazines, including McCall's and Family Circle..."
"New York's other newspapers are in no better hands than the Daily
News. The New York Post is owned by billionare Jewish real-estate developer
Peter Kalikow. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern,
the billionaire Jewish owner of..."
"There are only three newsmagazines of any note published in the
United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report....The CEO of
Time Warner Communications is Steven J. Ross, and he is a Jew.
"Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post
Co., under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham..."
"U.S. News & World Report... owned and published by Jewish real
estate developer Mortimer B. Zucherman..."
" The three largest book publishers...Random House... Simon &
Schuster , and Time Inc. Book Co....All three are owned or controlled by
Jews...The CEO of Simon & Schuster if Richard Snyder, and the president is
Jeremy Kaplan; both are Jews too."
"Western Publishing...ranks first among publishers of childrens books,
with more than 50 per cent of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard
Bernstein, a Jew."
"Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted Turner
isn't a Jew!" they will announce..."
"We are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on
our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are
giving them control of the minds and souls of our children..."
Denise
Hilary Ostrov
<1r5ugsouq2n3or73b...@4ax.com>, David Christian
<dckomat...@mindspring.com> wrote:
Bearing in mind, of course, that - to borrow some bons mots from the
late 70's - half-wits who aspire to be Cuddles' equal are
underachievers.
[follow-ups set]
hro
=====================
Hilary Ostrov
E-mail: hos...@uniserve.com
WWW: http://users.uniserve.com/~hostrov/
The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org/
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
Jeff <pitsar...@yahoo.com> wrote in article
<_WCP4.126$Xo1....@news.uswest.net>...
> Most Jews are white whether you like it or not.
>
They may be technically White but they are not one of us. They don't
want our race to live. They promote race-mixing to destroy all the White
race except for themselves. Here is proof that their media is against us:
A month ago I told you about the murder of two White girls, Tracy
Lambert and Susan Moore, in Fayetteville, North Carolina, as part of
the initiation of new members into the Black and Hispanic Crips gang.
I'm still receiving comments about that program. Apparently many
listeners -- especially those with Internet access -- checked out the
facts as reported in the Fayetteville newspaper, and they were shocked
that, just as I said, there was no media coverage of these terrible
murders outside the Fayetteville area. They were shocked that
virtually all of the mainstream media around the country would
deliberately hide the news of these racially motivated murders from
the White public -- and these were the same media which had made such
a sensation about the killing of a convicted Black drug dealer and his
girlfriend in Fayetteville by a White soldier, James Burmeister, in
December 1995.
But really, no one who has been listening to my broadcasts should have
been shocked. I have commented over and over again about the virtual
control of all of America's mass media by the Jews, and I have pointed
out many times that the Jews' policy is to disarm the White population
morally as well as physically by deliberately creating the false
impression that Whites are oppressors and victimizers, and non-Whites
are our innocent victims. They want us to feel guilty. They want us to
feel that it would be immoral for us to resist any of their schemes
for more non-White immigration, for more so-called "diversity" and
That is what the Jewish media bosses are deliberately pushing: the
destruction of our people through racial mixing, and they don't want
us to put up any resistance. And I am sorry to say, their program is
succeeding. When they send their step'n'fetchit Bill Clinton around
the country making speeches about how much he is looking forward to an
America with a non-White majority, about how any resistance to the
government's programs for the darkening of America would be
un-American, he is applauded by brainwashed young Whites who have been
deceived by this deliberately falsified media impression of Whites as
oppressors.
Now you know, I am making a pretty serious accusation. I am accusing
the Jewish population as a whole -- and the Jewish media bosses in
particular -- of planning our annihilation as a race, of planning to
commit genocide against us. And I don't want anyone to think that I am
basing my accusation on only the few instances of racially motivated
killings I already have cited: their suppression of the news of the
Fayetteville murders of two White girls by the Crips and their
sensationalizing of the news of the Fayetteville shooting of a Black
drug dealer and his girlfriend by a White soldier and of the dragging
death of another convicted Black criminal in Teaxas by three Whites.
Jewish media have deliberately covered up. The details aren't pleasant
-- in fact, they are shocking -- but I believe that many listeners
need to be shocked.
Let's begin with another crime which occurred in Fayetteville. This is
timely because the trial of the criminals began just last week. Here's
what happened: Donald Lange, a 25-year-old White soldier at Fort Bragg
accidentally bumped into a group of seven Black soldiers who were
going in. The Blacks began punching Lange while shouting racial
insults at him. They dragged him into the adjacent parking lot and
stomped and kicked him while continuing to shout racial epithets.
A witness in the trial of the Blacks, Tracye Cochran, was in the
parking lot where the assault took place. She told the court last
week, -- quote -- "The Black person who threw the first punch was the
one who knocked him down. . . . It dropped him down to his knees. He
got back up and got hit again. . . . I was walking toward the fight
screaming and hollering for them to leave him alone. . . . By then he
was just getting hit by people left and right." Another witness, Gina
Perez, testified that she saw eight or ten Blacks kicking and stomping
Lange as he lay on the pavement. She told of seeing one Black kicking
Lange in the face, causing his head to slam into the pavement and
bounce back. The Black would then kick him again, over and over. Perez
said, "They just kicked him to death. I remember him being on his
side, being kicked over and over again."
an example of why we must do something about "race hate." But
Mr. Clinton has responded to the stomping of Donald Lange with
silence.
If Donald Lange had been Black and his attackers White, the media
bosses would have had Janet Reno on television announcing that she was
sending in the FBI. The media would have been interviewing every
professional hate merchant: the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, Morris Dees and his Southern
Poverty Law Center, and all the rest. The media would have made a real
circus of it, and the whole world would have had it drummed into their
consciousness: another hate crime against a poor, innocent Black by
White racists in Fayetteville.
In order to convince the media bosses that he was doing something to
"end hate" after the Burmeister shooting of the Black drug dealer, the
commanding general of Fort Bragg ordered a witch hunt among the White
soldiers on the base. Every White soldier was checked for tattoos that
might suggest a skinhead affiliation. As the media frenzy continued,
the witch hunt for White racists in the Army eventually spread to
other bases. Now, don't hold your breath waiting for the general at
beliefs and their gang affiliations because of what Blacks from the
there, and the general has better things to do with his time.
Last month a Black mob in Alton, Illinois, which is a suburb of St.
into their neighborhood looking for his stolen television set. As they
were beating and kicking 48-year-old Richard Skelton to death on
August 10, the Blacks hooted, laughed, and shouted racial insults,
according to a number of eye-witnesses.
Now, it's possible that you may have read a few words about this
racially motivated murder -- if you're a careful reader of the small
news items in the back pages of your newspaper. But you certainly
didn't see anything about it on television or read any detailed news
accounts, unless you live in the immediate vicinity of Alton. Even the
news accounts in Alton tried to excuse the Black murderers by
suggesting that Skelton may have precipitated the attack on himself by
using racially insensitive language in asking about his stolen
beating the unarmed White man. Black bystanders watched and shouted
encouragement to the attackers. Others joined in the attack, and soon
as many as 25 Blacks were beating and kicking Skelton. They continued
kicking him until he was dead.
Again, imagine the response of the controlled mass media if the races
of the victim and the killers had been reversed: a Black wanders into
a White neighborhood and is beaten to death by a mob of 25 Whites who
laugh and shout racial insults as the Black dies. My god, the media
would be apoplectic! They would be calling for martial law and a
roundup of all heterosexual White males who weren't registered
over and over and over again, along with sermons against White racism.
But as it is, most of my listeners are now hearing about last month's
racially motivated mob murder of Richard Skelton for the first time.
Here's another one that you may have read a few words about if you're
a news hound or if you live in eastern New York state. Earlier this
month in Poughkeepsie, New York, a town on the Hudson River about 70
miles north of New York City, police discovered the decomposing
corpses of seven White women and one Black woman in the house of
Kendall Francois. The women had been murdered over a two-year period,
with the latest being killed just a month ago. Francois is a
27-year-old Black man who works as a hall monitor in a nearby high
school. Affirmative action got him the school job even though he had a
previous arrest record. Francois was living with his mother and father
and younger sister -- and eight decaying corpses. Police found the
dead women lying on beds and in the midst of piles of rotting garbage
in various rooms of his house. Francois's parents and his sister, who
is employed as a nurse at a nearby hospital, said that they hadn't
was the odor of the garbage which had been allowed to accumulate in
the house. Francois had picked up the women, one at a time, taken them
to his house, had sex with them, and then strangled them.
Now, in a sense the murders of these women may not have been race
crimes. The women were all prostitutes, and aside from the fact that
Francois had a preference for killing White prostitutes, we don't
really know what his motive was for killing them...
The real racial angle to these killings is the media response -- or
lack thereof. Do you remember John Wayne Gacy or Jeffrey Dahmer? I'm
sure you do, even though Gacy was arrested 20 years ago and Dahmer
more than seven years ago. Both of them also were serial killers who
stashed the bodies of their victims in or under their houses. Both
received enormous publicity when police caught them -- so much that we
still remember them many years later. But they were both White...
Earlier this month a court in Colorado convicted Francisco Martinez of
participating in the abduction, gang rape, torture, and murder of a
14-year-old White girl, Brandy Duvall. Martinez and six other members
of the Black and Hispanic Bloods gang grabbed Brandy from a bus stop
girl to the house of one of the gang members and spent several hours
raping her and then sexually torturing her with a knife and a
broomstick. During the trial one of the gang members told the court
how Martinez laughed as he repeatedly rammed a broomstick into the
body of the bleeding girl while she screamed and pleaded for her life.
Later they stabbed the 14-year-old girl 28 times and dumped her body
in a ditch. Then they went home and disposed of the bloody mattress on
which she had been raped and tortured.
Four of the Bloods gang members have pleaded guilty, one other besides
Martinez has been tried and convicted, and one is still awaiting
trial. This case is reminiscent of the Fayetteville murders last month
of two White girls by members of the Crips. The Crips and the Bloods
are the two largest non-White gangs in the United States. Like the
Fayetteville murders, Brandy Duvall's murder and the subsequent trials
have received virtually no national news coverage, although
Denver-area newspapers did report them.
Once again, imagine the reaction of the television networks and all of
the other national media if instead of the Bloods raping, sexually
torturing, and murdering a 14-year-old White girl, seven Ku Klux Klan
members had done that to a Black girl or a Mexican girl. The gruesome
details would be on every television screen in America night after
night after night, and there would be no end to the parade of
politicians and preachers and professional hate merchants telling us
about the evils of White racism. We know that's what would happen,
recently in the dragging death of the Black convict in Jasper, Texas,
this summer.
Now, all of the Black-on-White crimes I've just mentioned -- the
became a mindless vegetable; the kicking of Richard Skelton to death
by a Black mob in Alton, Illinois, when he tried to retrieve his
stolen television set; the murder of seven White prostitutes by a
torture, and murder of 14-year-old Brandy Duvall by members of the
Bloods gang in the Denver area after they had snatched her from a bus
stop -- all of these either occurred during the past month or came to
trial during the past month. And I could have given you twenty more
recent examples of horrible race crimes committed by non-Whites
against Whites which have received the silent treatment by the media,
except in the areas where they occurred. And these are all crimes
which would have received extensive national publicity if they had
been White-on-Black crimes.
Anyway, I hope that I've made my point. And my point is that the
controlled media are far more likely to publicize White-on-Black
crimes than Black-on-White crimes. And this is not just a fluke. It's
not that I have carefully selected a few Black-on-White crimes which
somehow escaped the attention of the media. No, their way of dealing
with interracial crime is systematic. It is consistent. We all
understand that. If the Ku Klux Klan does something, the Jewish media
act as if the sky is falling. If the Bloods or the Crips do something,
they ignore it. There is no denying that. We know it's true.
So why do they do it? If I ask a non-Jewish newspaper writer or
television reporter or magazine editor: "Why do you and your
colleagues minimize the news of Black-on-White crime? Why are you
protective of non-White organizations such as the Bloods and the
Crips? Don't you believe that you have a responsibility to warn the
White public about the dangers posed for us by non-White crime in
general and by non-White gangs such as the Bloods and the Crips in
particular?
"And why do your colleagues maximize the news of any White-on-Black
crime? Why do you go ballistic if there's any possibility of a White
organizational connection, even if some racially oriented literature
is found in the White offender's possession? Don't you understand that
the Bloods and the Crips are essentially anti-White criminal
organizations, while the Klan can only be accused of having members
who sometimes do stupid things? Why do you deliberately create the
false impression in the public mind that White-on-Black crime --
that's what you call "hate crime" -- is a big problem in our society,
and at the same time you hide from the public the truly horrendous and
dangerous problem of Black-on-White crime? Why do you do it?"
I've never gotten really clear and honest answers to these questions.
But what is clear is that they all know how they're expected to report
the news. They know what the party line is. They know which side their
bread is buttered on. It's clear that the top media bosses have set
the fashion for reporting interracial crime, and no one who works for
them is willing to depart from the fashion.
That fashion, which is almost never stated explicitly, which is only
implied, is this: White people are evil -- especially heterosexual
White males. They have persecuted non-Whites for hundreds of years.
White people really shouldn't complain if non-Whites sometimes strike
back at them. That's only justice. When Blacks and Mexicans organize
in gangs, it's only to protect themselves from Whites. But when Whites
organize, it's to oppress non-Whites. Whites need to be reminded that
they are oppressors. That's why White crimes against non-Whites should
be emphasized. And if we're to have a happy and prosperous
multicultural society with lots of diversity, which is of course a
wonderful thing, then Whites need to mix more with non-Whites . . . so
we shouldn't give them any news which might make them reluctant to
mix. We shouldn't tell them about Black crimes against Whites, because
that might frighten White women away from Black men. It might even
lead Whites to organize against non-Whites. In the long run the only
sure way to have a peaceful society, in which everyone gets along with
everyone else, is to get rid of the White majority: to replace the
present White majority with a non-White majority. A lot of racial
mixing and racial intermarriage will help to achieve that, and we
should report the news with that aim in mind.
That is the prevailing fashion in the controlled mass media today,
whether the media people will admit it or not. That fashion has been
set deliberately by the media bosses. And I, curious and inquisitive
person that I am, have looked at where that fashion is taking us, and
when I have done that I have looked into the face of death: racial
death, racial extinction. And I, hardheaded cynic that I am, have
decided that the Jewish media bosses who designed the current fashion
in reporting the news have in fact designed it with that aim in mind.
And I also have decided that it is our responsibility to ourselves, to
our posterity, to our ancestors, and to the God of Nature which made
us what we are to use any and all means -- any and all means -- to
combat these Jewish media bosses and their collaborators in the
government, in the schools, in the churches, and wherever else we find
them.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com.
National Vanguard Books
Attention: ADVlist
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946
or e-mail: nati...@NatVan.com please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
given.
--> TO BE REMOVED from this mailing list, send an e-mail
message to: ADV...@NatVan.com which has "unsubscribe"
as the subject of the message. (Don't type the " marks.)
(c) 1998 National Vanguard Books
The National Alliance
http://www.natvan.com
http://www.natall.com
Icq me at 11163228
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
Kenneth McVay, OBC <kmc...@vex.net> wrote in article
<8emvh6$2qcv$1...@news.tht.net>...
> In article <01bfb420$53307120$823ae6cf@default>,
> Alex Vangel <va...@i1.net> wrote:
>
> [pimping for an ex-convict's racist garbage]
>
> > Technically Jews are white but they are not considered one of us
> >because they are known enemies of our civilization.
>
> Mr. Vangel freely admits that White nations are the best nations.
> Mr. Vangel freely asserts that Jews run these nations.
> Mr. Vangel freely asserts that Jews control the media, the schools,
> and the monetary systems of these nations.
> Now, having admitted the Jews made these nations what they are, he
> damns them as "known enemies."
The former White nations were great, not because of who was in control
or who was in government, but
precisely because they were White nations.
The former White nations were at their best before the Jews took over.
They are "former" White nations because they are mainly interested in
multiculture and pluralism. The number one goal of the Jews is to destroy
the White race though race-mixing and intermarriage.
>
> This may be confusing to those with little or no experience dealing
> with the dual-neuron model of boneheaded Identity adherents, who might
> wonder how a man who devotes much of his life to praising Jews and
> damning Whites for being stupid can function, but there it is..
>
> Just think what Mr. Vangel might accomplish with _three_ neurons!
>
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important.
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second world
are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict. It is
because the White race is on average much more intelligent than the Black
race. The people in Japan are much lighter than the people in India.
$kr1p7...@tranquil.hegemony.ca wrote
"People, in general, aren't stupid... but are usually too occupied with
day-to-day concerns to properly inform theirselves. Thus, many issues
must be taken on faith, from the 'authorities' in the media, most of who
represent corporate, or political interests.
If you're a little bit unclear on this, I can suggest some reading
for you, Ken."
Here is a quote from a very pro-Jewish book that was first published
in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis Browne.
"The Jews had become the money lenders of Europe for quite evident
reasons. The Church sternly forbade all Christians to engage in the
persuit...
"So the Jews became the money lenders of Europe. They developed a
great shrewdness and cunning in the one and only field of opportunity left
open to them. And with their shrewdness and cunning they developed a
certain cruelty and greed. That was natural. The world was cruel to them,
so when the chance was theirs, they were cruel in return..."
The money system we have today is called the debt-money system.
It is evil and needs to be replaced. The only way money comes into
existance today is when it is borrowed. There is no fiixed money supply,
but only borrowed money that needs to be paid back to bankers with
interest. If all the money that was owed to bankers was ever paid back
there would be no money left in circulation and this would be a great
depression. What makes matters even worse is that when money is created
only the principle of the loan is created. The money needed to pay the
interest is never created. For this reason it is impossible to pay back the
principle plus the interest on all of the loans that make up our money
supply. The extra amount of money needed to pay the interest was never
created and does not exist.
The United States government borrows money from the Federal Reserve
Bank. This bank is not federal but owned by private stockholders. Other
banks also create the money in our money supply. They are allowed to loan
out much more money then they actually have. Thus they create new money. No
one else is allowed to create money, only bankers have this privilege. All
of our money is debt-money and it is all owed back to bankers, plus the
interest.
In the U.S.A. money is created by the Bureau of Engraving and
Printing which is a unit of the treasury, but the orders to print come from
the Federal Reserve Banks. The money is created for and owned by the banks.
And the Federal Reserve Banks are not Federal, in spite of the name.
Privately owned commercial banks own the stock of the Federal Reserve
Banks. The Federal Reserve Banks give the newly created money to the
government in exchange for government bonds. To simplify: The United States
does not make its own money. Bankers create the money and loan it to the
United States with an interest charge.
The book War Cycles Peace Cycles puts it this way:
"If there is only $10 in existance, and you lend it to someone
under the condition that he repay $11, and if he agrees to this, he has
agreed to the impossible."
The book The Struggle forWorld Power put it this way:
"The Bank of England... was the first payment institution which was
legally empowered to issue state-authorized paper currency and , therefore,
the Government itself became its debtor. Thus the State not only renounced
its monopoly on monetary emission, but also agreed to borrow the
privately-created money from the bankers...Not only the thing being done,
but even the very name was a deliberate fraud and deception to conceal the
essence of the deed. To create money out of nothing is to make valid and
effective claim on all goods and services for no return, which is fraud and
theft, made worse by the circumstances that the money is lent out at
interest...it follows that those who have the power to 'create' out of
nothing all the money in each country and the whole world and lend it as
stated, have total power over all states, parties, firms, radio, press,
individuals and so on. Therefore the power of Parliment in general, and
especially with regard to money, is non-existant, and all the true
sovereignty is in the hands of those private individuals who issue all
money"
m. brazeau
>
> http://stormfront.org
>
> Jeff <pitsar...@yahoo.com> wrote in article
> <_WCP4.126$Xo1....@news.uswest.net>...
> > Most Jews are white whether you like it or not.
> >
> They may be technically White but they are not one of us. They don't
> want our race to live. They promote race-mixing to destroy all the White
> race except for themselves. Here is proof that their media is against us:
>
What does that mean? If everybody mixes, the result is Jewish?!?
Fragano Ledgister
>Path:
>lobby!newstf02.news.aol.com!portc01.blue.aol.com!portc03.blue.aol.com!how
land.erols.net!news-out.digex.net.MISMATCH!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!interm
edia!cyclone.i1.net!news1.i1.net!not-for-mail
>From: "Alex Vange" va...@i1.net
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism, soc.culture.usa
>References: <3905...@ecn.ab.ca> <01bfb3c1$93d2f7c0$3e8b4ad1@default>
><8elbmi$imf$1...@nnrp1.deja.com> <01bfb420$53307120$823ae6cf@default>
><8emvh6$2qcv$1...@news.tht.net>
>Message-ID: <01bfb496$406024c0$d430e6cf@default>
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161
>Lines: 133
>Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 00:25:42 GMT
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.74.139.13
>X-Trace: news1.i1.net 957313542 209.74.139.13 (Tue, 02 May 2000 19:25:42 CDT)
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 19:25:42 CDT
>Xref: lobby alt.revisionism:846775 soc.culture.usa:576513
>
>
>
>
>http://stormfront.org
>
>Kenneth McVay, OBC <kmc...@vex.net> wrote in article
><8emvh6$2qcv$1...@news.tht.net>...
>> In article <01bfb420$53307120$823ae6cf@default>,
>> Alex Vangel <va...@i1.net> wrote:
>>
>> [pimping for an ex-convict's racist garbage]
>>
>> > Technically Jews are white but they are not considered one of us
>> >because they are known enemies of our civilization.
>>
>> Mr. Vangel freely admits that White nations are the best nations.
>> Mr. Vangel freely asserts that Jews run these nations.
>> Mr. Vangel freely asserts that Jews control the media, the schools,
>> and the monetary systems of these nations.
>> Now, having admitted the Jews made these nations what they are, he
>> damns them as "known enemies."
>
> The former White nations were great, not because of who was in control
>or who was in government, but
>precisely because they were White nations.
So when the Empire of Mali was great it was a white nation? When the Mughal
Empire was great it was a white nation? When Heian Japan was in its heyday it
was a white nation? When Aksum was great it was a white nation?
>
> The former White nations were at their best before the Jews took over.
The British Empire declined under Disraeli, then?
>They are "former" White nations because they are mainly interested in
>multiculture and pluralism. The number one goal of the Jews is to destroy
>the White race though race-mixing and intermarriage.
>
Really? And where is this stated? (Please don't cite that forgery _The
Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion_.)
Fragano Ledgister
(Fled...@aol.com)
I had no nation now but the imagination.
(Derek Walcott)
Sam Barber
"Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
>
> http://stormfront.org
Desperating Providing Refuge from Truth and Reason for Alex Vangeltramp
since 1995
> Jeff <pitsar...@yahoo.com> wrote in article
> <_WCP4.126$Xo1....@news.uswest.net>...
> > Most Jews are white whether you like it or not.
> >
> They may be technically White but they are not one of us.
They are white and they are human beings. Face reality, Vange, you
are against civilization and all it stands for.
You fool no one, Vange.
> They don't want our race to live.
Translation: Herr Vange wants Jews to die. So said Hitler, so says Vange.
>They promote race-mixing to destroy all the White
> race except for themselves.
Any person is free to choose to "mix" with anyone else. Fortunately,
your kind will die out since no one wants to "mix" with you, Herr Vange.
Your a disgrace to whites and Christians.
> Here is proof that their media is against us:
Headline, April 30, 2000: "The World Celebrates the 55th Anniversay of
the Death of Hitler: Good Riddance"
This is the only time you have been right, Herr Vange.
Here is proof that Alex Vange is not a Christian:
--------------------------------------------------------
Alex Vange, the epitomy of evil, confesses, 09 Apr 2000
Sam Barber:
"Are you saying that we should kill our delinquent children?"
Alex Vange:
"Yes. The schools would be a lot better. Society would be a
lot better. It says this in the Bible. It says that it is
so others will see and will learn and there will be no more
evil among us."
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
Denise <guar...@qnet.com> wrote in article <390f7...@news.qnet.com>...
> Climb back under your rock now!!! begone racist troll!!!!!
You have your beliefs because your only souce of information is the
Jewish controlled media. Here is proof that your media is biased against
White people:
david.e.michael
Hilary Ostrov wrote:
> On Tue, 02 May 2000 13:59:58 -0400, in
> <1r5ugsouq2n3or73b...@4ax.com>, David Christian
> <dckomat...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> >On 2 May 2000 16:25:10 GMT, kmc...@vex.net (Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
> >
> >>In article <01bfb420$53307120$823ae6cf@default>,
> >>Alex Vangel <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>[pimping for an ex-convict's racist garbage]
> >>
> >>> Technically Jews are white but they are not considered one of us
> >>>because they are known enemies of our civilization.
> >>
> >>Mr. Vangel freely admits that White nations are the best nations.
> >>Mr. Vangel freely asserts that Jews run these nations.
> >>Mr. Vangel freely asserts that Jews control the media, the schools,
> >>and the monetary systems of these nations.
> >>Now, having admitted the Jews made these nations what they are, he
> >>damns them as "known enemies."
> >>
> >>This may be confusing to those with little or no experience dealing
> >>with the dual-neuron model of boneheaded Identity adherents, who might
> >>wonder how a man who devotes much of his life to praising Jews and
> >>damning Whites for being stupid can function, but there it is..
> >>
> >>Just think what Mr. Vangel might accomplish with _three_ neurons!
> >
> >
> >With three, he might be at least as bright as Cuddles.
>
> Bearing in mind, of course, that - to borrow some bons mots from the
> late 70's - half-wits who aspire to be Cuddles' equal are
> underachievers.
>
> [follow-ups set]
>
> hro
> =====================
> Hilary Ostrov
> E-mail: hos...@uniserve.com
> WWW: http://users.uniserve.com/~hostrov/
> The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org/
Whatever my intellectual shortcomings, Ms O, at least I know how to use an
apostrophe -- '70's' indeed!
David
Derek Bell
: This may be confusing to those with little or no experience dealing
: with the dual-neuron model of boneheaded Identity adherents, who might
: wonder how a man who devotes much of his life to praising Jews and
: damning Whites for being stupid can function, but there it is..
*Dual*-neuron??? Methinks thou art too kind to him!
Derek
--
Derek Bell db...@maths.tcd.ie | Socrates would have loved
WWW: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/index.html| usenet.
PGP: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/key.asc | - J...@bluejo.demon.co.uk
Sam Barber
"Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> http://stormfront.org:
Fearing the Truth since 1995
>
> Jeff <pitsar...@yahoo.com> wrote in article
> <_WCP4.126$Xo1....@news.uswest.net>...
> > Most Jews are white whether you like it or not.
> >
> They may be technically White but they are not one of us.
They are white indeed. And yes, they are not Nazis.
Sam Barber
Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> http://stormfront.org:
Providing Refuge from Truth and Reason since 1995
> Yoni Rosenzweig <yon...@sas.uepnn.edu> wrote in article
> <8ekn9o$4s8$1...@netnews.upenn.edu>...
>> I enjoy the fact that those who support Capital
>> Punishment also think that Jews killed Jesus.\
>> Hey, ignoramus: Jesus was a fucking Jew, and all the
>> people arounf him too
> No, He was an Israelite and they were White people, not
> Jews.
Jews are whites as you have already admitted, Herr Vange.
> The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews.
Jews are whites as you have already admitted, Herr Vange.
> Jews claim to be God's chosen people because they have
> the Jewish religion. This proves nothing. People change
> their religion.
But they cannot change their race. Jews are whites as you
have already admitted, Herr Vange. And not just
"technically" white, as you are desperate in saying, but
really part of the white race. That is the fact.
You can run. You can weasel. But you cannot hide from the
truth, Herr Vange.
Sam Barber
Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> http://stormfront.org:
When the Going Gets Tough, We Deny the Truth
> Denise <guar...@qnet.com> wrote in article
> <390f7...@news.qnet.com>...
> Climb back under your rock now!!! begone racist
> troll!!!!!
> You have your beliefs because your only souce of
> information is the Jewish controlled media.
That source was you, Herr Vange.
Jeff
"Sam Barber" <SamB...@prontomail.com> wrote in message
news:8ep39c$mdb$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <01bfb494$ed1ca460$d430e6cf@default>,
>
> >
> > <_WCP4.126$Xo1....@news.uswest.net>...
> > > Most Jews are white whether you like it or not.
> > >
> > They may be technically White but they are not one of us.
>
>
>
You'd be amazed. A percentage of people are just plain nuts, and that
applies to the Jews as well. I'm sure some Jew, somewhere WAS a Nazi of
some sort.
Jeff
janus
wrote:
>
>You'd be amazed. A percentage of people are just plain nuts, and that
>applies to the Jews as well. I'm sure some Jew, somewhere WAS a Nazi of
>some sort.
Indeed there were, though very few.
Seventy-some officers of the Third Reich, despite their having had
Jewish grandparents (and in some cases, parents) were Aryanized by
decree.
I only know of three post-war Nazis who were subsequently outed as
being Jewish: Dan Burros (KKK/American Nazi Party), Davis Wolfgang
Hawke, aka Bo Decker, (Knights Of Freedom/American Nationalist Party)
and Frank Colin of the NSWPP, who has the added "distinction" of
having been convicted as a pedophile.
Alex Vange
Sam Barber <SamB...@prontomail.com> wrote in article
<8epmat$d3n$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>
> > No, He was an Israelite and they were White people, not
> > Jews.
>
> Jews are whites as you have already admitted, Herr Vange.
The Israelites were White but may not of included all the people who
are considered White today. The Edomites and Khazars are not Isrealites and
that is what most of the Jews are. I don't know if the ancient Israelites
would of accepted Slavs or Italians as Israelites. It would be too hard
today to decide who has enough Isrealite blood in them to be considered
one. I say we have nation of all people who are considered White, except
Jews. Maybe in Germany or Sweden they should be more fussy about who should
be a citizen. But in the USA I would say Italians are Poles are definately
one of us racially. It is not that Jews are less White racially than some
Slavs but that the Jews are known enemies. They can not be one of us
because they are the arch enemies of White Christian civilization. They
don't want the White race to survive at all except for themselves. It is
the Jew media that is pushing the race-mixing which they admit will destroy
the White race.
Here are some quotes from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis Browne.
"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated in
the heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were neither
Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing Jews at all.
"For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there was
Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl Marx,
though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of Israel
than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born in Germany
in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not himself reared
as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized a Christian by his
father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him thoughout his days, for
he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two men
who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went thoughout Europe
in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being waged, whether
in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there the Jew was to be
found. It was little wonder that the enemies of social progress, the
monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of the whole liberal movement
as nothing but a Jewish plot."
"The Jews had become the money lenders of Europe for quite evident
reasons. The Church sternly forbade all Christians to engage in the
persuit...
"So the Jews became the money lenders of Europe. They developed a
great shrewdness and cunning in the one and only field of opportunity left
open to them. And with their shrewdness and cunning they developed a
certain cruelty and greed. That was natural. The world was cruel to them,
so when the chance was theirs, they were cruel in return..."
>
> > The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews.
>
> Jews are whites as you have already admitted, Herr Vange.
>
> > Jews claim to be God's chosen people because they have
> > the Jewish religion. This proves nothing. People change
> > their religion.
>
> But they cannot change their race. Jews are whites as you
> have already admitted, Herr Vange. And not just
> "technically" white, as you are desperate in saying, but
> really part of the white race. That is the fact.
They want to be the only survivors of the Whites after they utterly
destroy the rest of the White race. They know that they would rule the
world totally and permanently after that, not that the world would be any
good.
>
> You can run. You can weasel. But you cannot hide from the
> truth, Herr Vange.
Gord McFee
+0100, "david.e.michael" <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
> Hilary Ostrov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 02 May 2000 13:59:58 -0400, in
> > <1r5ugsouq2n3or73b...@4ax.com>, David Christian
> > <dckomat...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On 2 May 2000 16:25:10 GMT, kmc...@vex.net (Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
> > >
> > >>In article <01bfb420$53307120$823ae6cf@default>,
> > >>Alex Vangel <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>[pimping for an ex-convict's racist garbage]
> > >>
> > >>> Technically Jews are white but they are not considered one of us
> > >>>because they are known enemies of our civilization.
> > >>
> > >>Mr. Vangel freely admits that White nations are the best nations.
> > >>Mr. Vangel freely asserts that Jews run these nations.
> > >>Mr. Vangel freely asserts that Jews control the media, the schools,
> > >>and the monetary systems of these nations.
> > >>Now, having admitted the Jews made these nations what they are, he
> > >>damns them as "known enemies."
> > >>
> > >>This may be confusing to those with little or no experience dealing
> > >>with the dual-neuron model of boneheaded Identity adherents, who might
> > >>wonder how a man who devotes much of his life to praising Jews and
> > >>damning Whites for being stupid can function, but there it is..
> > >>
> > >>Just think what Mr. Vangel might accomplish with _three_ neurons!
> > >
> > >
> > >With three, he might be at least as bright as Cuddles.
> >
> > Bearing in mind, of course, that - to borrow some bons mots from the
> > late 70's - half-wits who aspire to be Cuddles' equal are
> > underachievers.
> >
> > [follow-ups set]
>
> Whatever my intellectual shortcomings, Ms O, at least I know how to use an
> apostrophe -- '70's' indeed!
This from the man who has accused other posters of never making
significant contributions to the news group.
And he is even wrong in his nitpick.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Visit the Nizkor site
http://www.nizkor.org
Jeff
As for the post, it's too silly to debate.
Jeff
"Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote in message
news:01bfb559$aa631440$6a8b4ad1@default...
>
>
> http://stormfront.org
>
> Sam Barber <SamB...@prontomail.com> wrote in article
> <8epmat$d3n$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
> >
> > > No, He was an Israelite and they were White people, not
> > > Jews.
> >
> > > The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews.
> >
> > Jews are whites as you have already admitted, Herr Vange.
> >
> > > Jews claim to be God's chosen people because they have
> > > the Jewish religion. This proves nothing. People change
> > > their religion.
> >
Jeff
>
> http://stormfront.org
>
> Jeff <pitsar...@yahoo.com> wrote in article
> <_WCP4.126$Xo1....@news.uswest.net>...
> > Most Jews are white whether you like it or not.
> >
> They may be technically White but they are not one of us. They don't
> want our race to live.
Strange. Since they ARE (most of them) white I find that interesting,
especially as those Joos are so smart (intellect is VERY Jewish, isn't it?).
They promote race-mixing to destroy all the White
> race except for themselves.
No, LIBERAL people tend to be against pricks like you dictating who should
be allowed to LOVE who.
Some Jews are liberal, but some are conserative, and some are even radical
like you and believe that race mixing is wrong.
>Here is proof that their media is against us:
>
<SNIP sad story that proves nothing>
Hey, if you don't like "their" media, then start your own newspaper! It's a
free country. But you won't because:
1) You're lazy. You blame the Jews for being hard working, but YOU ARE
LAZY.
2) You're ignorant. You display this all the time.
3) You know your view doesn't and wouldn't sell.
4) You'd have to write something original (i.e. to much brain strain).
Jeff
--
Better to remain silent and be thought dumb,
than to speak and remove all doubt.
-- Chinese Proverb
Golem
A true Christian cannot condone anti-semitism/judiasm
because Persecuting Jews is, by analogy, the same as
persecuting Jesus.
* Sent from AltaVista http://www.altavista.com Where you can also find related Web Pages, Images, Audios, Videos, News, and Shopping. Smart is Beautiful
Mer...@yahoo.com
curiousg...@aol.com (CuriousGeorge613) wrote:
> Vangel writes:
>
> "Why would Jews write the following?"
>
> Because they abandoned their religious heritage and no longer
considered
> themselves Jews.
>
> "John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would
not
> walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
>
>
> "John 20:19 "the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled
for
> fear of the Jews"
>
> Ditto
>
> "2 Co 11:24 "Of the Jews five times recieved I forty stripes save
one. Thrice
> was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned"
>
> Written by Shaul of Tarsus -- not only a Jew, but a Pharisee.
>
> "Mathew 27: 20+25 "But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the
> multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus...then
answered all
> the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children."
>
> Mattityahu was also a Jew -- a Jewish tax collector. Reportedly, he
was a
> Levite.
>
> "Acts 25:24 "ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the
Jews have
> dealt with me, both at Jerusalem and also here, crying that he ought
not to
> live any longer."
>
> This was written by St. Luke, who was not a Jew. Try to fact-check
before
> making a (bigger) idiot of yourself.
>
> "John 8:42,44,48 "Jesus said unto them...Ye are of your father the
devil,
> and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning,
> and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he
speaketh
> a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of
it...Then
> answered the Jews..."
>
> Once again, Yochanan bar Zebediah
>
These men are not now considered to be Jews, but they considered
themselves to be. Christianity was not designated as a separate religion
for some time after Jesus's death. They did not consider themselves
Christians, they considered themselves Jews whose Messiah had come.
That IS the only distinction between Christians and Jews you
realize, Christians believe Christ is the Messiah, Jews consider
him to be merely a teacher. We are all of the same God. Maybe YOU should
be the one trying to avoid making an idiot of yourself.
Meredith
meredi...@my-deja.com
> <m3zoqi1...@localhost.localdomain>...
> > "david.e.michael" <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> writes:
> > >
> >
> > The determination is made on the status of the mother.
Furthermore,
> > he considered himself such. He claimed that he was here to
fullfill
> > Jewish prophecy and tradition. He consided himself a Jew. Jewish
> > authorities considered him a Jew. The Romans considered him a Jew.
> >
> > So, it's pretty clear that Jesus was a Jews in most every way that
> > makes a difference, except the *social-scientific hermenuetical
> > sophistical*.
>
> Christ was an Israelite, but these were White people and not Jews.
>
> The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews. Jews are
of
> Judaism and now they falsely claim to be Israelites.
>
not
> walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
>
Europe at
> one time or another. Many people know that they are enemies of White
> civilization. But not everyone knows the reason. It is because they
are not
> the chosen race and they hate those who really are the chosen race.
>
people are of Northern European/Scandanavian decent, where the climate
has less sun and weaker sun than other parts of the world, allowing for
paler skin (I guess we should also include a course dealing with biology
and adaptation to the environment in your education). At NO time before
trade routes were established and sea transport perfected were what you
call "white" people any where near Israel. A "white" person could not
have surrvived in that desert-like climate with such fair skin. The
Bible has been edited and translated, and interpreted mostly by "white"
males.Yet in no place in the Bible is race mentioned as a criteria for
Judaism. There are no racial requirements
for religion. There is no "chosen race". Your quote from Revelations is
not saying Jews are imposters, it is talking about certain individuals
who masquerade as believers in God but who actually perpetuate Satan's
law: hate (much like yourself, perhaps?) Your quote from John does not
say the Jews are our enemies, it says they sought to kill Jesus, who
they viewed as a heretic. If someone came around now telling you they
were Jesus, would you approve? Yes the Jews have been persecuted
historically in Christian Europe, mostly because of narrow minded people
who needed a scapegoat to blame for their own failings (much like
yourself, perhaps?) and don't forget: Christians were fed to the lions,
Protestants were burned at the stake, sometimes by Catholics, and
Catholics persecuted, sometimes bt by Protestants, and Christians
expelled from Christian countries. Does that mean
Christians are our enemies too? If so you're running out of friends, not
that I imagine you have any. The Jews aren't even a RACE, they're a
RELIGION (pull out your dictionary if you're confused) and need I remind
you that all Christians were once Jews in their lineage? Save for the
converts from the Pagan religions of the "white" people of Northern
Europe. That's right, not only were "white" people never Israelites,
they didn't even believ in God until they were converted. And Jews,
along with the Chinese, the Japanese, the Spanish, the Incas, Aztecs,
Mayans, and many other racial groups have contributed some of the most
vital technology and inventions to our world, both now and in the past.
Did you know Albert Einstein was a Jew? I suppose next you'll start
driveling on about Aryan supremacy. News flash, the Aryan people are
from Iran and Persia, they were dark skinned. And before you start
talking about my dark skin, I should probably let you know, I'm of
purely British and German descent, blonde and green eyed, and a
protestant. I believe in the teachings of Christ, one of the most
important being kindness, love, and tolerance for others, all others,
Gentile or Jew or what have you. But something I can't tolerate is
unfounded hate for people whom you probably have never met or had a
civil conversation with. There is no "chosen race" Religion knows no
race. Race is a social construction. We are all God's children. So get a
life.
p@u.c
>In article <8ekn9o$4s8$1...@netnews.upenn.edu>,
> "Yoni Rosenzweig" <yon...@sas.uepnn.edu> wrote:
>> I enjoy the fact that those who support Capital Punishment also think
>that
>> Jews killed Jesus.\
>>
>> Hey, ignoramus: Jesus was a fucking Jew, and all the people arounf
>
>How could a mythical character who never truly existed be a Jew or
>anything else for that matter? I understand your point, but there is
>as much historical evidence to support the existance of the so called
>"jesus" as there is to support the historical existance of "zeus" or
>"the mighty thor" and so on.
Actually, there is far more historical (i.e. non-religious texts)
evidence of the existence of Jesus than of the Greek or Norse gods. Jesus
and the early Christians are mentioned in several Roman and Jewish
writings from the first and second centuries A.D.
--
Patrick Crotty
e-mail: prcrotty at midway.uchicago.edu
home page: http://home.uchicago.edu/~prcrotty
Sam Barber
Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> Sam Barber <SamB...@prontomail.com> wrote in article
> <8epmat$d3n$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>>> No, He was an Israelite and they were White people, not
>>> Jews.
>> Jews are whites as you have already admitted, Herr
>> Vange.
> The Israelites were White but may not of included all the
> people who are considered White today.
How many times do I have to instruct you in the language
of your host country, Herr Vange?
"may not of included" is incorrect. It is "may not HAVE
included." Sheesh! What an idiot.
BTW, Jews are white and are considered white today
because the facts say so.
>> But they cannot change their race. Jews are whites as
>> you have already admitted, Herr Vange. And not just
>> "technically" white, as you are desperate in saying, but
>> really part of the white race. That is the fact.
> They want to be the only survivors of the Whites after
> they utterly destroy the rest of the White race. They
> know that they would rule the world totally and
> permanently after that, not that the world would be any
> good.
At least you have fully confessed that Jews are white
after all.
Here is your quiz for today:
Herr Vange, you are in an auto accident, injured, concious
but bleeding to death when you are found. An ambulance
driven by a black with a Jewish medic arrives on scene to
take you to a Jewish hospital with Jewish doctors and black
nurses. You are advised you need immediate surgery.
Would you:
a) Get in the ambulance?
b) If yes, would you allow the Jewish medic to bandage you?
c) If yes, would you consent to surgery in order to survive?
d) If yes, and survived, would you thank the doctors and nurses
and be forever grateful?
e) If no to any of the above, would you quote Mein Kampf and then
die?
P.S. The auto accident was caused by a National Socialist.
I. Jacobi
when shot during Hitler's abortive putsch circa 1923.
Sam Barber <SamB...@prontomail.com> wrote in message
news:8eudei$ko2$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <01bfb559$aa631440$6a8b4ad1@default>, "Alex
> Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
>
> > Sam Barber <SamB...@prontomail.com> wrote in article
> > <8epmat$d3n$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>
> >>> Jews.
>
mxy...@my-deja.com
The "far more historical evidence of the existence of Jesus" that you
refer to is a combination of church psuedographia and accounts based on
church propoganda. I refer you to the following web page for further
enlightenment on this subject:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jeff_lowder/jury/chap5.html
mar...@hotmail.com
Golem <golem_numb...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
> Jesus lived and died a Jew.
So, this thread is about Jews murdered another Jew?
intp...@ecn.ab.ca
: Jesus lived and died a Jew.
: because Persecuting Jews is, by analogy, the same as
: persecuting Jesus.
But Jews do condone anti white and anti Christian racism.
Which is why they are cursed by God.
Subject: Writings From the Talmud
If a Gentile loses something, a Jew may keep it, even if he knows
the owner.
Bad Kamma 113b, p. 666
It is permissible to cheat a Gentile in court. Baba Kamma 113a,
p.667
All Gentile children are legally bastards, since Gentiles are only
animals.
Yebamoth 98a, p.670-671
God is displeased when Jews show hospitality to Gentiles. Sanhedrin
104a, p. 707
Living in the land of Israel gives one eternal life. Pesahim 113a,
p. 582
Jesus was a bastard born of adultery. Yebamoth 49b, p. 324
Jesus was a magician and a fool. Mary was an adulteress. Shabbath
104b, p. 504
Jesus was guilty of sorcery and apostasy; he deserved execution. The
disciples of Jesus deserved to be killed. Sanhedrin 43a, p. 281-282
Christians are allied with Hell, and Christianity is worse than
incest. Abodah Zarah 17a, p.
Going to prostitutes is the same as becoming a Christian. Abodah
Zara 17a, p. 87
Someone posted these writings from the Jewish holy book, the talmud.
Could someone tell me if it is a sin to attach the word "Judeo"
to the Blessed Name of "Christian"? After reading some of the things
written in their holy book, I'm appalled at what I uncovered. I think the
thing that puzzles me most, is that the Jews don't apologize for these
writings; even the Messianic Jews. Even though, I'm sure most of them
probably do not believe or practice the abominations found in the talmud.
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
: * Sent from AltaVista http://www.altavista.com Where you can also find related Web Pages, Images, Audios, Videos, News, and Shopping. Smart is Beautiful
--
When evil is glorified as good, Any nation that tries to
and good vilified as evil, make its women men and its
Then the time of Satan is at hand. men women is doomed to
extinction !
Intphase
Bob Loblaw
<intp...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote in message news:3914...@ecn.ab.ca...
So, if your a Christian, how many people do you know follow a 2,000 year old
book by the letter? Using a scroll written in a savage day must be a
perfect excuse to justify the fact that all modern day Jews are evil.
If you choose to condemn people due to the assumption that they live by the
letter of the ancient books that were the foundation of their faith, you
might as well do yourself in as well, as the Christian Bible isn't exactly a
fucking love story.
Just in case you fucking call me a Jew, I'm not. I just deplore stupidity
and narrow-mindedness.
Jeff
there in the Talmud. Someone care to confirm?
Jeff
Gladstone
"Jeff" <pitsar...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:gc_Q4.289$_62....@news.uswest.net...
> Now I'm curious, someone who knows, I suspect that these writings aren't
> there in the Talmud. Someone care to confirm?
>
> Jeff
>
No kidding. It just makes you think that all Rabbis are carrying guns,
and the sole goal is to kill gentiles. What a crock of shit.
Warren's All-Stars
Jeff wrote:
> Now I'm curious, someone who knows, I suspect that these writings aren't
> there in the Talmud. Someone care to confirm?
>
> Jeff
Of course they're not. Common sense should tell you that without any special
knowledge. The anti-Semites are fond of pointing out that the Jews are so
clever that they are able to control the world. Would these oh-so-clever
people be so stupid as to publish such tripe as this forger posts here? Use
your brains, man. You are easily able to find a translation of the talmud to
check these references for yourself. Once you do, the forgers' agenda of hate
becomes perfectly clear.
Steve
22
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
meredi...@my-deja.com wrote in article <8et1ot$6b2$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
> Perhaps you should re-take world history. The origins of "white"
> people are of Northern European/Scandanavian decent, where the climate
> has less sun and weaker sun than other parts of the world, allowing for
> paler skin (I guess we should also include a course dealing with biology
> and adaptation to the environment in your education). At NO time before
> trade routes were established and sea transport perfected were what you
> call "white" people any where near Israel. A "white" person could not
> have surrvived in that desert-like climate with such fair skin.
If that is so then what were White people doing in Egypt?
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops, the
builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs of her
tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a bright yellow
stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin is white."
Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan.
1939, p.98
The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in
Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.
Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971, p.249
The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8
"A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a vivid
blue-green color of eyes.
A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the the British
Museam. London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49
The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.
Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch, N.Y. 1972 p.68
Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.
Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of
Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt, Journal of the
Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII, 1889,
p.216
The mummy of Rameses II has fine silky yellow hair.
Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R. Egyptian Mummies, London, George
Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924 p.99
A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored
ones.
De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899, p.26
Amenhotep III's tomb painting shows him as having light red hair.
National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its Splendors,1978
p.103
An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.
Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma,
University of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53
A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called Wedjat
Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue" in
Egyptian.
Queen Thi is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and blond
hair.
Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil" Bulletin de la Societe
d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739
Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red hair
and blue eyes.
Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932, plate
XI
The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.
Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne, Marseille, Musee Boreby,
1973 p.94
A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking man
with blond hair.
Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient
Egypt. New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65
Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The Great.
It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another picture can
be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the picture on the
jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.
A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published showing
paintings,scuptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading personalities
of Ancient Egypt. Of these, 102 appear European, 13 look black and the rest
are hard to classify. All nine mummies look European.
The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very
European, The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed the
Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the face of
the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books Alexandria, VA 1992 p.67
It was once painted sunburned red.
Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt N.Y., N.Y., T. Nelson
1971 p.168
The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper class
women as white; this because the men became sunburned or tanned while
outside under the burning Egyptian sun.
The information above is part of the information compiled by Phillip
Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street, SE,
Washington, D.C. 20003
The
> Bible has been edited and translated, and interpreted mostly by "white"
> males.Yet in no place in the Bible is race mentioned as a criteria for
> Judaism. There are no racial requirements
> for religion. There is no "chosen race".
Anyone who has read the Bible knows there is a chosen race and that
this is what most of the Old Testament is about. Identity just shows that
they were White people rather than Jews.
Ezra 10:11 "Now therefore make confession unto the Lord God of your
Fathers, and do his pleasure: and separate yourselves from the people of
the land, and from the strange wives."
Matthew chapter 15
22: And behold, a woman of Cannan came out of the same coasts, and cried
unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; me daughter
is greivously vexed with a devil.
23: But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought
him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.
24: But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the
house of Israel.
25: Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.
26: But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the childrens bread,
and cast it to dogs.
27: And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall
from their masters table.
28: Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith; be
it unto you even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that
very hour.
Your quote from Revelations is
> not saying Jews are imposters, it is talking about certain individuals
> who masquerade as believers in God but who actually perpetuate Satan's
> law: hate (much like yourself, perhaps?) Your quote from John does not
> say the Jews are our enemies, it says they sought to kill Jesus, who
> they viewed as a heretic. If someone came around now telling you they
> were Jesus, would you approve?
The Pharisees were certainly enemies of Christ and the Jews of today
-are- Pharisees.
The New Jewish Encyclopedia, edited by David Bridger, PH.D in
association with Samual Wolk, Rabbi, J.S.D, copyright 1962, Published by
Behrman House, inc.,1261 Broadway, New York 1, N.Y., Library of Congress
Catalog Card Number: 62-17079, says on page 376:
"The Pharisees are therefore regarded as those authorities who helped
develop and preserve traditional Judaism as it is known today."
Yes the Jews have been persecuted
> historically in Christian Europe, mostly because of narrow minded people
> who needed a scapegoat to blame for their own failings (much like
> yourself, perhaps?) and don't forget: Christians were fed to the lions,
> Protestants were burned at the stake, sometimes by Catholics, and
> Catholics persecuted, sometimes bt by Protestants, and Christians
> expelled from Christian countries. Does that mean
> Christians are our enemies too?
No, here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
"Anyhow, the Jew has attained the ends he desired. Catholics and
Protestants are fighting with one another to their hearts content, while
the enemy of Aryan humanity and all Christendom is laughing up his sleeve."
"the Jew trafficked in the freedom of the nation and sold our country
to the masters of international high finance. So in our day he has
succeeded again, this time by raising ructions between the two German
religious denominations while the foundations on which both rest are being
eaten away and destroyed through the poison injected by the international
and cosmopolitan Jew."
If so you're running out of friends, not
> that I imagine you have any. The Jews aren't even a RACE, they're a
> RELIGION (pull out your dictionary if you're confused)
Jews who are atheist still say they are Jews. If they convert to other
religions they also still say they are Jews.
and need I remind
> you that all Christians were once Jews in their lineage? Save for the
> converts from the Pagan religions of the "white" people of Northern
> Europe. That's right, not only were "white" people never Israelites,
> they didn't even believ in God until they were converted. And Jews,
> along with the Chinese,
Indo-European: The Mummies of Xinjiang
The Mummies of Xinjiang
In the dry hills of this central Asian province, archeologist have
unearthed more than 100 corpses hat are as much s 4,000 years old.
Astonishingly well preserved - and Caucasian.
One glimpse of the corpses was enough to shock Victor Mair profoundly.
In 1987, Mair, a professor of Chinese at the University of Pennsylvania,
was leading a tour group through a museum in the Chinese city of Urumqi, in
the central Asian province of Xinjiang, when he accidentally strayed into
gloomy, newly opened room. There, under glass, lay the recently
discovered corpses of a family - a man, a woman, and a child of two or
three - each clad in long, dark purple woolen garments and felt boots. Even
today I get chills thinking about that first encounter," says Mair. "The
Chinese said they were 3,000 years old, yet the bodies looked as if they
were buried yesterday."
But the real shock came when Mair looked closely at their faces. In
contrast to most central Asian peoples,these corpses had obvious Caucasian,
or European, features - blond hair, long noses, deep-set eyes, and long
skulls."I was thunderstruck," Mair recalls. "Even though I was supposed
to be leading a tour group, I just couldn't leave that room. The questions
kept nagging at me: Who were these people? How did they get out here at
such an early date?"
The corpses Mair saw that day were just a few of more than 100 dug up by
Chinese archeologists over the past 16 years. All of them are astonishingly
well preserved.They come from four major burial sites scattered between
the arid foothills of the Tian Shan ("Celestial Mountains") in northwest
China and the fringes of the The Taklimakan Desert, some 150 miles due
south. All together, these bodies,dating from about 2000 B.C. to 300 B.C.,
constitute significant addition to the world's catalog of prehistoric
mummies. Unlike the roughly contemporaneous mummies of ancient Egypt, the
Xinjiang mummies were not ruler or nobles; they were not interred in
pyramids or other such monuments,nor were they subjected to deliberate
mummification procedures.
They were preserved merely by being buried in the parched, stony desert,
where daytime temperatures often soar over 100 degrees. In the heat the
bodies were quickly dried, with facial hair, skin, and other tissues
remaining largely intact.
Where exactly did these apparent Caucasians come from? And what were
they doing at remote desert oases in central Asia?
Any answers to these questions will most likely fuel a wide-ranging
debate about the role outsiders played in the rise of Chinese civilization.
As far back as the second century B.C., Chinese texts refer to alien
peoples called the Yuezhi and the Wusun, who lived on China's far western
borders; the texts make it clear that these people were regarded as
troublesome "barbarians." Until recently, scholars have tended to downplay
evidence of any early trade or contact between China and the West,
regarding the development of Chinese civilization as an essentially
homegrown affair scaled off from outside influences; indeed, this view is
still extremely congenial to the present Chinese regime. Yet some
archeologists have begun to argue that these supposed barbarians might have
been responsible for introducing into China such basic items as the wheel
and the first metal objects. Exactly who these central Asian outsiders
might have been, however what language they spoke and where they came from
- is a puzzle. No wonder, then, that scholars see the discovery of the
blond mummies as a sensational new clue...
Most researchers now think the birthplace of horsedrawn vehicles and horse
riding was in the steppes east and west of the Urals rather than in China
or the Near East. As archeologist David Anthony and his colleagues have
shown through microscopic study of ancient horse teeth, horses were already
being harnessed in the Ukraine 6,000 years ago. The Ukraine horses, Anthony
found, show a particular kind of tooth wear identical to that of modern
horses that "fight the bit." The world's earliest high-status vehicles also
seem to have originated in the steppes; recent discoveries of wooden
chariots with elaborate spoked wheels were reported by Anthony to date to
around 2000 B.C. Chariots do not seem to have appeared in China until some
800 years later...
had wagons and well-tailored clothes. Were they mere goat and
sheep farmers? Or did they profit from or even control prehistoric trade
along the route that later became the Silk Road? If so, they probably
helped spread the first wheels and certain metalworking skills into China.
"Ultimately I think our project may end up having tremendous implications
for the origins of Chinese civilization," Mair reflects. "For all their
incredible inventiveness, the ancient Chinese weren't cut off from the
rest of the world, and influences didn't just flow one way, from China
westward."
Unfortunately, economics dictates that answers will be slow in coming.
The Chinese have the money to spare for this work, and Wang and his team
continue to operate on a shoestring. Currently most of the corpses and
artifacts are stored in a damp, crowded basement room at the Institute
of Archeology in Urumqi, in conditions that threaten their continued
preservation. If Mair's plans for a museum can be financed with Western
help, perhaps the mummies can be moved. Then, finally, they'll receive
the study and attention that will ultimately unlock their secrets.
>the Japanese,
They are the whitest of the Asian people. They are much lighter than the
people in India. And in India the people are very poor.
>the Spanish,
White
>the Incas, Aztecs, Mayans,
Their legends say that "white Gods" came and taught them everything.
>and many other racial groups
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of
Cheops....(posted above)
have contributed some of the most
> vital technology and inventions to our world, both now and in the past.
> Did you know Albert Einstein was a Jew?
Albert Einstein is held up by the Jewish liars as a rare
genius who drastically changed the field of theoretical
physics. As such, he is made an idol to young people and
his very name has become synonymous with genius. The truth,
however, is very different. The reality is that Einstein
was an inept, moronic Jew who could not even tie his own
shoelaces; he contributed nothing original to the field of
quantum mechanics or any other science, but on the contrary
he stole the ideas of other men and the Jewish media made
him a hero.
When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we
find that his only brilliance lies in his ability to
plagiarize and steal other people's ideas, passing them off
as his own.
Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part
of this story. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of
Einstein's early education that he "showed little
scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of
15, "with poor grades in history, geography, and languages,
he left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in
a school paper of his "lack of imagination and practical
ability."
In 1895, Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an
engineering school in Zurich. This exam consisted mainly of
mathematical problems, and Einstein showed himself to be
mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a lesser
school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the
engineering school he could not get into, but after
graduating in 1900, he still could not get a position at
the engineering school!
Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he got a job
(with the help of a friend) at the patent office in Bern.
He was to be a technical expert third class, which meant
that he was too incompetent for a higher qualified
position. Even after publishing his so-called
groundbreaking papers of 1905 and after working in the
patent office for six years, he was only elevated to a
second class standing. Remember, the work he was doing at
the patent office, for which he was only rated third class,
was not quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was
reviewing technical documents for patents of every day
things; yet he was barely qualified. He would work at the
patent office until 1909, all the while continuously trying
to get a position at a university, but without success. All
of these facts are true, but now begins the Jewish myth.
Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid
of university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a
laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with
an academic setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four
ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical physics
and quantum mechanics that were published in 1905.
Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a
feat, including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein
has led people to believe that many of these ideas came to
him in his sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is
the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept
moron could have written such documents at the age of 26
without any real education. However, a simpler explanation
exists: he stole the ideas and plagiarized the papers.
Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover
the source of each. It should be remembered that these
ideas are presented by Einstein's worshippers as totally
new and completely different, each of which would change
the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the
following four ideas, respectively:
1. The foundation of the photon theory of light;
2. The equivalence of energy and mass;
3. The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
4. The special theory of relativity.
Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory
of relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely
attributed to Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt
with what Einstein called the Special Theory of Relativity
(the General Theory would come in 1915).
This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian
mechanics and was based upon two premises: 1) in the
absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the same
for all observers; and 2) since the speed of light is
independent of the motion of its source, then the time
interval between two events is longer for an observer in
whose frame of reference the events occur at different
places than for an observer in whose frame of reference the
events occur in the same place. This is basically the idea
that time passes more slowly as one's velocity approaches
the speed of light, relative to slower velocities where
time would pass faster.
This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is
the basis for modern physics. But these two premises are
far from being originally Einstein's. First of all, the
idea that the speed of light was a constant and was
independent of the motion of its source was not Einstein's
at all, but was proposed by the Scottish scientist James
Maxwell.
Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light extensively and
first proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature. He
wrote an article to this effect for the 1878 edition of the
Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate,
and by 1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing
debate, the scientific community, particularly Lorentz,
Michelson, and Morley reached the conclusion that the
velocity of light was independent of the velocity of the
observer.
Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was
known 27 years before Einstein wrote his paper.
This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and
Morley to conduct an important experiment, the results of
which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They
observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not
understand relativity. They had attempted to detect the
motion of the earth through ether, which was a medium
thought to be necessary for the propagation of light.
In response to this problem, in 1889, the Irish physicist
George FitzGerald, who had also first proposed a mechanism
for producing radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that
the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment could be
explained if,
"... the length of material bodies changes, according as
they are moving through the ether or across it, by an
amount depending on the square of the ratio of their
velocities to that of light."
This is the theory of relativity, 13 years before
Einstein's paper!
Furthermore, in 1892, Hendrik Lorentz, from The
Netherlands, proposed the same solution and began to
greatly expand the idea. All throughout the 1890's, both
Lorentz and FitzGerald worked on these ideas and wrote
articles strangely similar to Einstein's Special Theory
detailing what is now known as the Lorentz-FitzGerald
Contraction.
In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down equations
explaining the Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction and its
relativistic consequences, 7 years before Einstein's paper.
By 1904, Lorentz transformations, the series of equations
explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz. They
describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length,
and the time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to
the velocity of light.
In short, by 1904, everything in Einstein's paper regarding
the Special Theory of Relativity had already been published.
The Frenchman Poincaré had, in 1898, written a paper
unifying many of these ideas. He stated seven years before
Einstein's paper that,
"... we have no direct intuition about the equality of two
time intervals. The simultaneity of two events or the order
of their succession, as well as the equality of two time
intervals, must be defined in such a way that the
statements of the natural laws be as simple as possible."
Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately
recognize the similarity and the lack of originality on the
part of Einstein. Thus we see that the only thing original
about the paper was the term 'Special Theory of
Relativity.' Everything else was plagiarized.
Over the next few years, Poincaré became one of the most
important lecturers and writers regarding relativity, but
he never, in any of his papers or speeches, mentioned
Albert Einstein. Thus, while Poincaré was busy bringing the
rest of the academic world up to speed regarding
relativity, Einstein was still working in the patent office
in Bern and no one in the academic community thought it
necessary to give much credence or mention to Einstein's
work. Most of these early physicists knew that he was a
fraud.
This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the
subject of another of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian
motion describes the irregular motion of a body arising
from the thermal energy of the molecules of the material in
which the body is immersed.
The movement had first been observed by the Scottish
botanist Robert Brown in 1827. The explanation of this
phenomenon has to do with the Kinetic Theory of Matter, and
it was the American Josiah Gibbs and the Austrian Ludwig
Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence, not Albert
Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the
motion contains the famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between
these two men, they had explained by the 1890s everything
in Einstein's 1905 paper regarding Brownian motion.
The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was
contained in a third paper published by Einstein in 1905.
This concept is expressed by the famous equation E=mc².
Einstein's biographers categorize this as "his most famous
and most spectacular conclusion."
Even though this idea is an obvious conclusion of
Einstein's earlier relativity paper, it was not included in
that paper but was published as an afterthought later in
the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass equivalence was
not original with Einstein.
That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had
been shown in the laboratory in the 1890s by both J.J.
Thomsom of Cambridge and by W. Kaufmann in Göttingen. In
1900, Poincaré had shown that there was a mass relationship
for all forms of energy, not just electromagnetic energy.
Yet, the most probable source of Einstein's plagiarism was
Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the most brilliant, yet
unappreciated physicists of the era.
Hasenöhrl was the teacher of many of the German scientists
who would later become famous for a variety of topics. He
had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and
energy for many years and had published a paper on the
topic in 1904 in the very same journal which Einstein would
publish his plagiarized version in 1905. For his brilliant
work in this area, Hasenörhl had received in 1904 a prize
from the prestigious Vienna Academy of Sciences.
Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and
energy was a simple deduction from the already well-known
equations of Scottish physicist James Maxwell. Scientists
long understood that the mathematical relationship
expressed by the equation E=mc² was the logical result of
Maxwell's work, they just did not believe it.
Thus, the experiments of Thomson, Kaufmann, and finally,
and most importantly, Hasenörhl, confirmed Maxwell's work.
It is ludicrous to believe that Einstein developed this
postulate, particularly in light of the fact that Einstein
did not have the laboratory necessary to conduct the
appropriate experiments.
In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he
suggested to the scientific community, "Perhaps it will
prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose
energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of
radium)." This remark demonstrates how little Einstein
understood about science, for this was truly an outlandish
remark.
By saying this, Einstein showed that he really did not
understand basic scientific principles and that he was
writing about a topic that he did not understand. In fact,
in response to this article, J. Precht remarked that such
an experiment "lies beyond the realm of possible
experience."
The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was
the foundation of the photon theory of light. Einstein
wrote about the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric
effect is the release of electrons from certain metals or
semiconductors by the action of light. This area of
research is particularly important to the Einstein myth
because it was for this topic that he unjustly received his
1922 Nobel Prize.
But again, it is not Einstein, but Wilhelm Wien and Max
Planck who deserve the credit. The main point of Einstein's
paper, and the point for which he is given credit, is that
light is emitted and absorbed in finite packets called
quanta. This was the explanation for the photoelectric
effect.
The photoelectric effect had been explained by Heinrich
Hertz in 1888. Hertz and others, including Philipp Lenard,
worked on understanding this phenomenon. Lenard was the
first to show that the energy of the electrons released in
the photoelectric effect was not governed by the intensity
of the light but by the frequency of the light. This was an
important breakthrough.
Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers
of modern day quantum theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based
upon his and Wien's work, had shown that radiated energy
was absorbed and emitted in finite units called quanta. The
only difference in his work of 1900 and Einstein's work of
1905 was that Einstein limited himself to talking about one
particular type of energy - light energy.
But the principles and equations governing the process in
general had been deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein
himself admitted that the obvious conclusion of Planck's
work was that light also existed in discrete packets of
energy. Thus, nothing in this paper of Einstein's was
original.
After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the
scientific community took little notice and Einstein
continued his job at the patent office until 1909 when it
was arranged for him to take a position at a school by
World Jewry. Still, it was not until a 1919 newspaper
headline that he gained any notoriety.
With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed
in a position where he could begin to use other people's
work as his own more openly. He engaged many of his
students to look for ways to prove the theories he had
supposedly developed, or ways to apply those theories, and
then he could present the research as his own or at least
take partial credit.
In this vein, in 1912, he began to try and express his
gravitational research in terms of a new, recently
developed calculus, which was conducive to understanding
relativity. This was the beginning of his General Theory of
Relativity, which he would publish in 1915. But the
mathematical work was not done by Einstein - he was
incapable of it.
Instead, it was performed by the mathematician Marcel
Grossmann, who in turn used the mathematical principles
developed by Berhard Riemann, who was the first to develop
a sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is the basis of all
mathematics used to describe relativity.
The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of
relativity to the universe; that is, to the gravitational
pull of planets and their orbits, and the general principle
that light rays bend as they pass by a massive object.
Einstein published an initial paper in 1913 based upon the
work which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann to
Relativity. But this paper was filled with errors and the
conclusions were incorrect.
It appears that Grossmann was not smart enough to figure it
out for Einstein. So Einstein was forced to look elsewhere
to plagiarize his General Theory. Einstein published his
correct General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and said
prior to its publication that he, "...completely succeeded
in convincing Hilbert and Klein." He is referring to David
Hilbert, perhaps the most brilliant mathematician of the
20th century, and Felix Klein, another mathematician who
had been instrumental in the development of the area of
calculus that Grossmann had used to develop the General
Theory of Relativity for Einstein.
Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the
reader to believe that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and
Klein's opinions regarding General Relativity, and that he
had influenced them in their thinking. However, the exact
opposite is true. Einstein stole the majority of his
General Relativity work from these two men, the rest being
taken from Grossmann.
Hilbert submitted for publication, a week before Einstein
completed his work, a paper which contained the correct
field equations of General Relativity. What this means is
that Hilbert wrote basically the exact same paper, with the
same conclusions, before Einstein did. Einstein would have
had an opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along,
because there were Jewish friends of his working for
Hilbert.
Yet, even this was not necessary, for Einstein had seen
Hilbert's paper in advance of publishing his own. Both of
these papers were, before being printed, delivered in the
form of a lecture.
Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin
and Hilbert had presented his paper on November 20 in
Göttingen. On November 18, Hilbert received a letter from
Einstein thanking him for sending him a draft of the
treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th.
So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least
two weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the two
men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send
Hilbert an advance copy of his. Therefore, this serves as
incontrovertible proof that Einstein quickly plagiarized
the work and then presented it, hoping to beat Hilbert to
the punch. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began
to belittle Hilbert, even though in the previous summer he
had praised him in an effort to get Hilbert to share his
work with him. Hilbert made the mistake of sending Einstein
this draft copy, but still he delivered his work first.
Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of
much higher quality than Einstein's. It is known today that
there are many problems with assumptions made in Einstein's
General Theory paper. We know today that Hilbert was much
closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper is the forerunner of
the unified field theory of gravitation and
electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin Schrödinger,
whose work is the basis of all modern day quantum mechanics.
That the group of men discussed so far were the actual
originators of the ideas claimed by Einstein was known by
the scientific community all along. In 1940, a group of
German physicists meeting in Austria declared that "before
Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasenöhrl,
Poincaré, etc., had created the foundations of the theory
of relativity..."
However, the Jewish media did not promote the work of these
men. The Jewish media did not promote the work of David
Hilbert, but instead they promoted the work of the Jew
Albert Einstein.
As we mentioned earlier, this General Theory, as postulated
by Hilbert first and in plagiarized form by Einstein
second, stated that light rays should bend when they pass
by a massive object. In 1919, during the eclipse of the
Sun, light from distant stars passing close to the Sun was
observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence
supported the General Theory of Relativity, and the Jewish-
controlled media immediately seized upon the opportunity to
prop up Einstein as a hero, at the expense of the true
genius, David Hilbert.
On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the
headline of which proclaimed, "Revolution in science - New
theory of the Universe - Newtonian ideas overthrown." This
was the beginning of the force-feeding of the Einstein myth
to the masses.
In the following years, Einstein's earlier 1905 papers were
propagandized and Einstein was heralded as the originator
of all the ideas he had stolen. Because of this push by the
Jewish media, in 1922, Einstein received the Nobel Prize
for the work he had stolen in 1905 regarding the
photoelectric effect.
The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and
1922 was an important coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As
soon as Einstein had been established as an idol to the
popular masses of England and America, his image was
promoted as the rare genius that he is erroneously believed
to be today. As such, he immediately began his work as a
tool for World Zionism.
The masses bought into the idea that if someone was so
brilliant as to change our fundamental understanding of the
universe, then certainly we ought to listen to his opinions
regarding political and social issues. This is exactly what
World Jewry wanted to establish in its ongoing effort of
social engineering. They certainly did not want someone
like David Hilbert to be recognized as rare genius. After
all, this physicist had come from a strong German, Gentile
background.
In August of 1934, the day before a vote was to be taken
regarding installing Adolf Hitler as President of the
Reich, Hilbert signed a proclamation in support of Adolf
Hitler, along with other leading German scientists, that
was published in the German newspapers. So the Jews
certainly did not want David Hilbert receiving the credit
he deserved.
The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he
deserved either. This German's grandfather and great-
grandfather had been important German theologians, and
during World War II Planck would stay in Germany throughout
the war, supporting his fatherland the best he could.
The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin
Schrödinger to be heralded as a genius to the masses. This
Austrian physicist would go on to teach at Adolf Hitler
University in Austria, and he wrote a public letter
expressing his support for the Third Reich. This Austrian's
work on the unified field theory was a forerunner of modern
physics, even though it had been criticized by Einstein,
who apparently could not understand it.
The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as
a rare genius, even though he would go on to solidify
quantum theory and contribute to it greatly, as well as
develop his famous uncertainty principle, in addition to
describing the modern atom and nucleus and the binding
energies that are essential to modern chemistry. No, the
Jews did not want Heisenberg promoted as a genius because
he would go on to head the German atomic bomb project and
serve prison time after the war for his involvement with
the Third Reich.
No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number
of white Germans, Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen,
Englishmen, and even Americans who had contributed to the
body of knowledge and evidence from which Einstein
plagiarized and stole his work. Instead, they needed to
erect Einstein as their golden calf, even though he
repeatedly and often embarrassed himself with his
nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding the work he
had supposedly done.
For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a
front page article in which Einstein gave an "emphatic
denial" regarding the idea of practical applications for
the "energy of the atom." The article says,
"But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If
you believe that man will someday be able to harness this
boundless energy--to drive a great steamship across the
ocean on a pint of water, for instance-then, according to
Einstein, you are wrong..."
Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of
physics he had supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the
world at the time theoretical research was underway that
would lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear energy. But after
Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he made no real
attempts to plagiarize any other work.
Rather, he began his real purpose--evangelizing for the
cause of Zionism and World Jewry. Though he did publish
other articles after this time, all of them were co-
authored by at least one other person, and in each
instance, Einstein had little if anything to do with the
research that led to the articles; he was merely recruited
by the co-authors in order to lend credence to their work.
Thus freed of the pretense of academia, Einstein began his
assault for World Zionism.
In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States
on a fund-raising tour for the Hebrew University in
Jerusalem and to promote Zionism. In April of 1922,
Einstein used his status to gain membership in a Commission
of the League of Nations. In February of 1923, Einstein
visited Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June of 1923, he became
a founding member of the Association of Friends of the New
Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from his Communist
and Zionistic activities to again embarrass himself
scientifically by criticizing the work of Schrödinger and
Heisenberg.
Following a brief illness, he resumed his Zionistic agenda,
wanting an independent Israel and at the same time a World
Government.
In the 1930s he actively campaigned against all forms of
war, although he would reverse this position during World
War II when he advocated war against Germany and the
creation of the atomic bomb, which he supposedly thought
was impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the
request of other Jews, wrote two letters to Roosevelt
urging an American program to develop an atomic bomb to be
used on Germany--not Japan. Einstein would have no part in
the actual construction of the bomb, theoretical or
practical, because he lacked the skills for either.
After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the
White Race and of the Germans in particular in the
following statements. He was asked what he thought about
Germany and about re-educating the Germans after the war
and said,
"The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally
since 1870 . . . Behind the Nazi party stands the German
people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book and in
his speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the
possibility of misunderstanding. . . . The Germans can be
killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-
educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting . . ."
In December of 1946, Einstein rekindled his efforts for a
World Government, with Israel apparently being the only
autonomous nation. This push continues through the rest of
the 1940s. In 1952, Einstein, who had been instrumental in
the creation of the State of Israel, both politically and
economically, was offered the presidency of Israel. He
declined.
In 1953, he spent his time attacking the McCarthy
Committee, and he supported communists such as J. Robert
Oppenheimer. Einstein encouraged civil disobedience in
response to the McCarthy trials. Finally, on April 18,
1955, this filthy Jewish demagogue died.
Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making
stupid statements. His death was just the beginning of his
usage and exploitation by World Jewry. The Jewish-
controlled media continued to promote the myth of this
Super-Jew long after his death, and as more and more of the
men who knew better died off, the Jews were more and more
able to aggrandize his myth and lie more boldly.
This brazen lying has culminated in the Jew controlled Time
magazine naming Einstein "The Person of the Century" at the
close of 1999. It may be demonstrated that the Jewish lies
have become more bold with the passage of time because
Einstein was never named "Man of the Year" while he was
alive, but now, over forty years after his death, he is
named "Person of the Century."
Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut
choice for the "Person of the Century," Adolf Hitler.
Hitler was indeed named "Man of the Year" while he was
still living by Time magazine, and according to a December
27, 1999, article in the USA Today, Einstein was chosen
over Adolf Hitler because of the perceived "nasty public
relations fallout" that would accompany that choice; yet in
internet polling by Time, Hitler finished third and was the
top serious candidate.
Still the issue of Time magazine dedicated to Einstein,
which has articles by men with names like Isaacson, Golden,
Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt, is interesting to read.
For one, they found it necessary to include an article
rationalizing why they did not pick the obvious choice,
Adolf Hitler. But more interesting is the article by
Stephen Hawking which purports to be a history of the
theory of relativity. In it, Hawking admits many of the
things in this article, such as the fact that Hilbert
published the General Theory of Relativity before Einstein
and that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the concept of
relativity long before Einstein.
Hawking also writes,
"Einstein . . . was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner
Heisenberg in Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin
Schrödinger in Zurich, who developed a new picture of
reality called quantum mechanics. . . . Einstein was
horrified by this . . . Most scientists, however, accepted
the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed
excellent agreement with observations . . . They are the
basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular
biology and electronics and the foundation of the
technology that has transformed the world in the past half-
century."
This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits
Einstein with all of the modern developments that Hawking
names, even though Einstein was so stupid as to be
vehemently against the most important idea of modern
science, just as he opposed Schrödinger's work in unified
field theory which was far ahead of its time. The same
magazine admits that "success eluded" Einstein in the field
of explaining the contradictions between relativity and
quantum mechanics.
Today, these contradictions are explained by the unified
field theory, but Einstein, who proves himself to be one of
the least intelligent of 20th century scientists, refused
to believe in either quantum theory or the unified field
theory.
To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one of
the most ludicrous and absurd lies of all time, yet it has
been successfully pulled off by Isaacson, Golden, Stein,
Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and the Jewish owners of Time
magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted to give the title to
an inventor or scientist, then the most obvious choice
would have been men like Hilbert, Planck, or Heisenberg. If
they wanted to give it to the scientist who most
fundamentally changed the landscape of 20th century
science, then the obvious choice would be William Shockley.
This Nobel prize winning scientist invented the transistor,
which is the basis of all modern electronic devices and
computers, everything from modern cars and telephones, VCRs
and watches, to the amazing computers which have allowed
incomprehensible advances in all fields of science. Without
the transistor, all forms of science today would be
basically in the same place that they were in the late
1940s.
However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to
William Shockley because he spent the majority of his
scientific career demonstrating the genetic and mental
inferiority of non-whites and arguing for their
sterilization. His scientific, genetic views led the Jews
to financially destroy Shockley who founded the first
company in the Silicon Valley, his hometown, to develop
computer chips. The Jews hired away his entire staff and
used them to start Fairchild semiconductor, the company
that today is known as Intel.
No, the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses
of our time be recognized, not the anti-Semite Henry Ford,
not the great German scientists who helped the National
Socialists in Germany, not Charles Lindbergh, who was
sympathetic to National Socialist causes, and certainly not
William Shockley, one of the most brilliant physicists and
geneticists of our time. Instead, the Jews propped up the
Zionist, Communist Albert Einstein who hated everything
white.
I suppose next you'll start
> driveling on about Aryan supremacy. News flash, the Aryan people are
> from Iran and Persia, they were dark skinned.
Why argue about semantics? There needs to be a word to describe the White
race without including Jews.
And before you start
> talking about my dark skin, I should probably let you know, I'm of
> purely British and German descent, blonde and green eyed, and a
> protestant.
Real Germans don't have dark skin.
I believe in the teachings of Christ, one of the most
> important being kindness, love, and tolerance for others, all others,
> Gentile or Jew or what have you. But something I can't tolerate is
> unfounded hate for people whom you probably have never met or had a
> civil conversation with. There is no "chosen race" Religion knows no
> race. Race is a social construction. We are all God's children. So get a
> life.
Real Christians are for this:
The Nazis outlawed abortion. They outlawed homosexual perversion and
feminism. They outlawed pornagraphy and prostitution. They removed the race
of anti-Christs from controlling the media. They rejected both the madness
of Communism and the greed of Capitalism.
Jeff
You know what? A REAL Christian is one who follows Christ. You know what
Jesus' two most important laws were?
1. Love God
2. Love your neighbor
You seem to fail at both. So HOW are you a real Christian again? Jews did
not feel this way and the laws which you use comes mainly from the Old
Testiment (Leviticus, for example). In other words, you come closer to a
radical Jew than a Christian fanatic. And it fits. Look:
1. You think the Jews should have their own country and ALL should live
there. Radical Jews feel the same way.
2. You accept that Jews are far smarter than all other groups. You put
down other groups endlessly. Radical Jews feel the same way.
3. You hold that race mixing with "inferior" races will dilute the race and
should be banned. Radical Jews feel the same way.
4. You do not follow Jesus but follow much more closely the Hebrew Law.
So, Rabbi Vange please see the light and stop this BS.
Jeff
intp...@ecn.ab.ca
: Jesus lived and died a Jew.
: A true Christian cannot condone anti-semitism/judiasm
: because Persecuting Jews is, by analogy, the same as
: persecuting Jesus.
Newsgroups: alt.christnet, alt.religion.christian
Writings From the Talmud
--
dudalb
DedNdogYrs
isn't filled with ugliness?
Dogs & children first.
Rev Peter
jher...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2000 06:31:36 +0100, david.e.michael
> <david.e...@variousisps.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >CuriousGeorge613 wrote:
> >
> >> News flash: Jesus a Jew!
> >
> >Well since his father was presumably a non-human, he would at most
have
> >been a half-Jew racially.
>
> His mother was a Jew.
RevP:
We have no idea what his mother was! Provide the book, chapter, and
verse, which says Mary was a Jew?
peace
Rev Peter
--
http://members.xoom.com/grgaud/
"In revealed religions, you have blasphemy and heresy.
In Deism, you have questions and free speech."
-- Ladyhank.
Susan Cohen
dudalb wrote:
> Try the genelogies of Mary given in the gospels for starters, moron.
Try learning that you can't prove something with itself, moron
Rev Peter
RevP:
There is no genealogy of Mary anywhere in the gospels. Both Matthew and
Luke [we don't actually know who wrote the gospels which carry their
names], provide different genealogies for two different Josephs.
Matthew: "to Jacob was born Joseph" In other words: Joseph the son of
Jacob
Luke: "Joseph, the son of Eli"
In Matthew, Joseph is identified as the husband of Mary; in Luke, there
is no mention of Mary. So Jesus is either the son of Joseph the son of
Jacob, or Joseph the son of Eli. Virgin births don't happen, and Paul
even denies such;
Romans 1: 3, "... 3 concerning His Son, who was born ... according to
the flesh, ..." In effect, Jesus was conceived and born naturally, not
unnaturally, which would be the case in a virgin birth.
This Mary genealogy crap is nonsense, it is a cheap apologetic; there is
not a single case in the Tanakh where a female genealogy is given. As
for Mary, the gospel authors, as well as the other NT writers tell us
absolutely nothing about her, except that her cousin was a Levite.
So as far as the gospel evidence goes: 100% of what there is points to a
Levite heritage. Yet the Messiah is descended from the Davidic royal
line of kings [not through Nathan, but through Solomon], which means
Judah. Through Mary, Jesus has 0% chance of being the Messiah; he lacks
the correct family tree.
Stuart Dunn
>
> Golem (golem_numb...@hotmail.com.invalid) wrote:
> : Jesus lived and died a Jew.
> : A true Christian cannot condone anti-semitism/judiasm
> : because Persecuting Jews is, by analogy, the same as
> : persecuting Jesus.
>
> Newsgroups: alt.christnet, alt.religion.christian
> Subject: Writings From the Talmud
>
> Writings From the Talmud
>
> If a Gentile loses something, a Jew may keep it, even if he knows
> the owner.
> Bad Kamma 113b, p. 666
Antisemites like you are more than happy to fabricate what you wish were
in the Talmud so that you could spread antisemitism.
Have you ever actually read an excerpt of the talmud? That's not the
style it's written in. What they did was write down the topic under
discussion, and then they wrote a summary of what each rabbi present
thought of it. It doesn't have statements like that in it.
Avital Pilpel
> Writings From the Talmud
>
> If a Gentile loses something, a Jew may keep it, even if he knows
> the owner.
> Bad Kamma 113b, p. 666
"Bad Kamma"??? Sort of like "Bad Karma", I guess. There isn't such a book
in the Talmud, of course. He probably means "Bava Kama".
It's really funny, the way these loons obviously never read the Talmud
they seem to hate so much, and simply re-copy with increasing spelling
mistakes the same misquotes and mistranslations.
Oh, well, I guess it's better than the time I saw one of these Talmud
experts mistranslated the name "Bava metzia" (literally, "middle door",
meaning "middle book" of the Talmud) into "Saba Mekia" - literally, "a
female grandfather is throwing up."
Did I say I was not making this up?
Avital Pilpel
z
blah. The kind of deep understanding that lends credence.
In article
<Pine.GSO.4.10.100051...@ciao.cc.columbia.edu>,
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
z
They have less patience with nutcases than the Jews do.
In article <01bfaf0c$654ee1c0$058b4ad1@default>, "Alex Vange"
<va...@i1.net> wrote:
> The Jews have been expelled from every Christian nation in
> Europe at
> one time or another. Many people know that they are enemies of
> White
z
being Aryans and all.
http://emayzine.com/lectures/notesonindia.htm
In article <01bfb3c1$93d2f7c0$3e8b4ad1@default>, "Alex Vange"
<va...@i1.net> wrote:
> They are advanced because they are the lightest color of the Asian
> people. The people in India are much darker and in India they are
> very poor.
z
Vange pointed out the flaw.
In article <01bfb559$aa631440$6a8b4ad1@default>, "Alex Vange"
<va...@i1.net> wrote:
> They want to be the only survivors of the Whites after they
> utterly
> destroy the rest of the White race. They know that they would
> rule the
> world totally and permanently after that, not that the world would
> be any
> good.
> >
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
z
Book of Biographies of National Socialist Theoretical Physicists.
In article <01bfb820$75f332c0$LocalHost@default>, "Alex Vange"
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
intp...@ecn.ab.ca
: > Subject: Writings From the Talmud
: > Writings From the Talmud
: >
: > If a Gentile loses something, a Jew may keep it, even if he knows
: > the owner.
: > Bad Kamma 113b, p. 666
: Antisemites like you are more than happy to fabricate what you wish were
: in the Talmud so that you could spread antisemitism.
Actually you mean anti Jewish, don't you ?
Semites includes Arabs who don't follow the Talmud.
Jewish religious philosophy is different from race.
Which is another matter.
: Have you ever actually read an excerpt of the talmud? That's not the
: style it's written in. What they did was write down the topic under
: discussion, and then they wrote a summary of what each rabbi present
: thought of it. It doesn't have statements like that in it.
So explain the following.
Writings From the Talmud
If a Gentile loses something, a Jew may keep it, even if he knows
the owner.
Bad Kamma 113b, p. 666
It is permissible to cheat a Gentile in court. Baba Kamma 113a,