A New, Selective ‘Semi-Antisemitism’?
Michael Ejercito
A New, Selective ‘Semi-Antisemitism’?
Only Jews Opposing Obama Are Evil, Greedy, and Have Dual Loyalty
by Barry Rubin, PAJAMAS MEDIA
I was horrified by reports that a powerful congressman, Henry Waxman,
had said that Jews in New York’s ninth congressional district voted
against President Barack Obama “to protect their wealth.” Could the
obsession with backing Obama have led a leading Jewish politician to
make such a stereotypical antisemitic remark?
In fact, Waxman’s statement was taken out of context. As usually
happens, however, a proper understanding of what someone is saying
teaches far more than stereotyping their argument.
Let’s examine Waxman’s statement as quoted in The Hill newspaper:
I think Jewish voters will be Democratic and be for Obama in 2012,
especially if you get a Republican candidate like [Texas] Gov. [Rick]
Perry. But there’s no question the Jewish community is much more
bipartisan than it has been in previous years. There are Jews who are
trending toward the Republican Party, some of it because of their
misunderstanding of Obama’s policies in the Middle East, and some of
it, quite frankly, for economic reasons. They feel they want to
protect their wealth, which is why a lot of well-off voters vote for
Republicans.
Let’s consider this statement. The first part is correct: More Jews
are voting against Democrats and will vote against Obama, but the
majority will continue to support them. The problem comes in the
second part, and an accurate reading teaches us several things.
First, the Democratic Party has taken a sharp turn to the left and
much of which passes for “liberalism” nowadays is in fact a radicalism
that opposes traditional liberal ideas. American liberalism has never
been systematically or doctrinally anti-capitalist, much less anti-
American.
There is a vast scam going on that represents the current left’s
success in doing what the Communist Party tried to do in the 1930s.
That’s why many liberal — and especially Jewish — intellectuals have
turned against what’s happening now. Even many of those Democrats and
Jews in general who vote for radicals-pretending-to-be-liberals do so
with deep doubts.
Hey, Mr. Waxman, I’d love to vote Democrat, but I can’t because your
party and president advocate and implement policies that endanger the
United States, destroy the economy, create unemployment, and
destabilize the world. They also damage Israel’s security, Middle East
stability, the struggle against revolutionary Islamism, and even build
anti-Israel views and hatred among many American supporters of your
side. If you want my vote, get rid of Obama and change your policies.
Instead, what we’re getting is the manipulation of habit and
fearmongering to make Jews — and others — think of conservatives and
Republicans as a blend of country club antisemite, Nazi storm trooper,
and religious fanatic. The administration and its supporters are doing
everything possible to spread hate, fear, and arrogant snobbishness
toward fellow Americans.
The reference to Perry is an example. Is the fact that Governor Rick
Perry is a pious Christian really some threat to Jews? Definitely not,
but how many Jews will believe that? Well, under 50 percent for sure.
There is, however, a new paradigm, at least in the United States, in
which believing Christians are more friendly to Jews and Israel on the
whole than are atheists.
Second, it is absurd to say that Jews “misunderstand” Obama’s Middle
East policy. They understand it all too well. I want to stress,
however, that the problem is not just U.S .-Israel relations, but the
wider regional approach taken by the administration that makes
Israel’s situation far worse and more dangerous.
Let’s remember that Waxman campaigned hard for Obama by telling Jews
that the candidate loved Israel and was no problem for it. Waxman
lied; the peace process died, thanks not to Israel but to Obama.
Equally, Obama has been soft on or actually favored the forces most
inimical to Israel: Egyptian revolutionaries including the Muslim
Brotherhood, Hamas, the Palestinian Authority, the Islamist regime in
Turkey, and the Syrian government. His policies have helped to block
any discussion of Islamist and Islamic antisemitism, the main threat
to Jews in the world today.
Thus, while many have overstated the problems Obama’s policies have
brought to Israel — for example, military ties are as good as they
have ever been; Obama will veto the unilateral Palestinian
independence move in the UN — the dangers and damages arising from
Obama’s administration have been gigantic. Incidentally, in three
years I don’t think Obama has made a single statement ever that
combined support for Israel with blame for its enemies.
Finally, there is the big controversial point. Waxman doesn’t say that
Jews are voting based on their wealth but only Jews who vote against
Obama and his supporters. This is an old theme: anyone who doesn’t
support this administration is doing so because they are greedy, while
supporters vote for it because they are noble and altruistic.
This mirrors Obama’s own claim that those who vote against him are
merely reactionaries, racists, religious fanatics, and gun nuts. When
he said that, Obama was speaking to a wealthy crowd of rich people in
San Francisco, ridiculing the less affluent. In some ways, despite the
pejoratives, it was more truthful than what Waxman said, implying that
Jews who don’t vote for Democrats are “bitter clingers” to Israel and
their wallets.
Of course, this misrepresents points that people like Waxman want to
hide.
I would bet that on the whole the income of Jews who will vote for
Obama in 2012 is higher than those who will oppose him. A large
proportion of those opposing Obama are not affluent but are hurt by
his policies. I wouldn’t be surprised that if one only counts white
voters, the average income of Obama supporters is higher than that of
Obama opponents.
While the most wealthy people are probably disproportionately anti-
Obama (though by a smaller margin than many would think), the upper-
middle class is disproportionately pro-Obama. Among white workers, at
least, Obama supporters come from what Marxists used to call the
“labor aristocracy,” highly paid union members. The ninth district of
New York is a good example. Those voters are not affluent at all.
I cannot prove the above points statistically, but there is undeniably
a lot of truth in them.
In addition, Obama supporters are also acting “for economic reasons”
and “to protect their wealth.” On one hand, there are the
beneficiaries of government spending, many of whom don’t pay taxes.
Those who work for government and those who benefit from handouts are
also voting for their material interest. What do they care if taxes go
up and debt becomes dangerous? And what of crony capitalism, in which
favored fat-cats get billions in taxpayer money? Bureaucrats of the
world unite! You have nothing to lose but your entitlement claims.
A useful way of thinking about it is that Americans who vote against
Obama are indeed thinking about their wealth. If the depression
continues, if the economy collapses, if they cannot find a job or lose
their job, if the dollar is reduced in value, if energy and other
prices rise due to administration policy, then these people will
certainly have less wealth. Since the administration’s policies are so
damaging, there are likely to be more people worried about losing
their lifestyle or livelihood than those who think the administration
will give them “free” (that is, funded by other American) goodies.
Of course, Waxman is still playing with dangerous antisemitic
concepts. Similarly, the demonization of Israel by Obama supporters
also feeds antisemitism. What is one to make of such common themes as
Israel doesn’t want peace, is oppressive and brutal, etc.? How far is
the distance between that and saying that terrorism against Israeli
citizens is justifiable or that Israel should be a pariah?
We haven’t gotten to the point where Waxman is saying that Jews who
oppose Obama kidnap little Democrats and use their blood to make
matzot but — and, yes, I’m joking — we may see something like this
before November 2012.
See also my article reprinted from Bitter Lemons: International
Efforts to Avoid the Palestinian UN Bid Will Inevitably Fail Because
Western Policy is So Bad.
The Revd
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/39901
>
>A New, Selective ‘Semi-Antisemitism’?
>
>Only Jews Opposing Obama Are Evil, Greedy, and Have Dual Loyalty
>by Barry Rubin, PAJAMAS MEDIA
The Peeler
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted again:
>>
>>Only Jews Opposing Obama Are Evil, Greedy, and Have Dual Loyalty
>>by Barry Rubin, PAJAMAS MEDIA
>
> Rubin??? Found a new jew rectum to suck, gook?
public, The Rectum? Must be your lucky day! LOL
--
Retarded, subnormal and extremely proud of it: our resident psychopath, The
Retard (aka "The Rectum").
Michael Ejercito
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:08:53 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/39901
>
> >A New, Selective ‘Semi-Antisemitism’?
>
> >Only Jews Opposing Obama Are Evil, Greedy, and Have Dual Loyalty
> >by Barry Rubin, PAJAMAS MEDIA
>
> Rubin???
>Found a new jew rectum to suck, gook?
Found someone whose articles' substance you are unable to address.
Instead, you stick with racial slurs, anti-Jewish slurs, and Holocaust
denial.
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.
Michael
The Revd
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sep 20, 4:10 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:08:53 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/39901
>>
>> >A New, Selective ‘Semi-Antisemitism’?
>>
>> >Only Jews Opposing Obama Are Evil, Greedy, and Have Dual Loyalty
>> >by Barry Rubin, PAJAMAS MEDIA
>>
>> Rubin???
> Yes.
>>Found a new jew rectum to suck, gook?
> Found someone whose articles' substance you are unable to address.
>Instead, you stick with racial slurs, anti-Jewish slurs, and Holocaust
>denial.
The Peeler
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted again:
>>> Rubin??? �
>> Yes.
>
> A jew asshole.
No asshole around like you, "The Rectum"! <BG>
>>>Found a new jew rectum to suck, gook?
>> Found someone whose articles' substance you are unable to address.
>>Instead, you stick with racial slurs, anti-Jewish slurs, and Holocaust
>>denial.
>
> I don't address jew lies, gook.
No pathological liar around like you, The Rectum! <BG>
Topaz
Jews say that being "anti-Semitic" is a terrible crime. Do they say
being "anti-Arab" is a terrible crime? What about "anti-Christian", or
"anti-German"? Of course the Jews think
they are special. Any other group could be our enemy, but not the
Jews, they say. The Jews tell us the Arabs are our enemies. The
Jewish controlled media tells us that the Jews are America's only
friend in the Middle East. The truth is that before these Jews America
didn't have any enemies in the Middle East.
No one is moaning because America once fought the British. But
suddenly Jews can not be the enemy under any circumstances. Why is
that? Because the Jews control the media. Think outside the box.
Now that America is ruled by the Jews it is no insult to be called
"anti-Semite". The insult is that they think we care about their self
serving verbiage.
The Jewish controlled media said the French were "cheese eating
surrender monkeys". Why can't the French howl "anti-French" like the
Jews howl "anti-Semite"? Because the French don't control the media,
Jews do.
This is what President Nixon said:
http://www.hnn.us/comments/15664.html
"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints
about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in
the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the
large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the
big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into
consideration."
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:30:59 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >On Sep 20, 4:10 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:08:53 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/39901
>
> >> >A New, Selective ‘Semi-Antisemitism’?
>
> >> >Only Jews Opposing Obama Are Evil, Greedy, and Have Dual Loyalty
> >> >by Barry Rubin, PAJAMAS MEDIA
>
> >> Rubin???
> > Yes.
>
> A jew asshole.
>
> >>Found a new jew rectum to suck, gook?
> > Found someone whose articles' substance you are unable to address.
> >Instead, you stick with racial slurs, anti-Jewish slurs, and Holocaust
> >denial.
>
> I don't address jew lies, gook.
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
Bill explains what nithings are.
http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446
Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings
by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”
We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”
We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings
Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,
The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.
A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.
The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”
The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”
“Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.
The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.
This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.
In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.
The Revd
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sep 20, 11:22 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:30:59 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Sep 20, 4:10 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:08:53 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/39901
>>
>> >> >A New, Selective ‘Semi-Antisemitism’?
>>
>> >> >Only Jews Opposing Obama Are Evil, Greedy, and Have Dual Loyalty
>> >> >by Barry Rubin, PAJAMAS MEDIA
>>
>> >> Rubin???
>> > Yes.
>>
>> A jew asshole.
> Who is better than you.
Impossible, gook. I'm WHITE.
<gook repetition b'rissed>
The Peeler
farted again:
>>>
>>> A jew asshole.
>> Who is better than you.
>
> Impossible, gook. I'm WHITE.
REAL "whites" look down on you!
Michael Ejercito
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> >On Sep 20, 11:22 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:30:59 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Yes.
>
> >> A jew asshole.
> > Who is better than you.
>
> Impossible, gook. I'm WHITE.
Honor, decency, and integrity are core characteristics, and you
have none.
>
> <gook repetition b'rissed>
The following link explains you.
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-nazi
Michael
The Revd
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sep 22, 9:01�am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Sep 20, 11:22 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:30:59 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Yes.
>>
>> >> A jew asshole.
>> > � Who is better than you.
>>
>> Impossible, gook. �I'm WHITE.
> That is just a superficial characteristic.
> Honor, decency, and integrity are core characteristics, and you
>have none.
have a word for them.
The Peeler
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted again:
>>> >> A jew asshole.
>>> > Who is better than you.
>>>
>>> Impossible, gook. I'm WHITE.
>> That is just a superficial characteristic.
>
> It's the ONLY relevant characteristic, gook.
Says who? YOU??? A certified idiot? LOL!!!
>> Honor, decency, and integrity are core characteristics, and you
>>have none.
>
> None of those are gook characteristics, gook. You people don't even
> have a word for them.
Says who? YOU? A universally recognized idiot and psycho? LOL!
--
Quotes about The Rectum:
Jimbo: "You're an abortion that should have happened."
Attila: "Are you a corpse that has not died yet?"
Virgil: "The world would be a better place if we could go
back in time and abort some idiots like formby before they were hatched."
Ejercito:"If he believed in racial hygiene, he would gas himself."
Ray Fischer: "We're not interested in your sexual fantasies, pervert."
Doug: "Pitiful diarrhea is the Revd's real name."
The Chief Instigator: "You've all the strength of wet toilet paper."
W.T.S.: "You are a liar. You are an obvious liar. You are a liar who has no
talent for making a lie believable."
Doug: "Your posts are nothing but written diarrhea."
Michael Ejercito
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:35:35 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sep 22, 9:01 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Who is better than you.
>
> >> Impossible, gook. I'm WHITE.
> > That is just a superficial characteristic.
>
> It's the ONLY relevant characteristic, gook.
By the way, Lawrence Russell Brewer is still dead and there is
NOTHING that you can do about it.
>
> > Honor, decency, and integrity are core characteristics, and you
> >have none.
>
> None of those are gook characteristics, gook.
They are HUMAN characteristics.
Try being one.
> You people don't even
> have a word for them.
The following article explains your pathology.
History's oldest hatred
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
March 11, 2009
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4743/historys-oldest-hatred
ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so it
is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-
Semitism" -- a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or Jew-
hatred -- is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never had
anything to do with Semites or being Semitic. (That is why those who
protest that Arabs cannot be anti-Semitic since "Arabs are Semites
too" speak either from ignorance or disingenuousness.)
Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable and unyielding as
anti-Semitism. "The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan,
religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis
Prager in Why the Jews?, their classic study of anti-Semitism.
"Fascists have accused them of being Communists, and Communists have
branded them capitalists. Jews who live in non-Jewish societies have
been accused of having dual loyalties, while Jews who live in the
Jewish state have been condemned as 'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied,
and rich Jews are resented. Jews have been branded as both rootless
cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews who assimilate have been
called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay together spark hatred
for remaining separate."
So hardy is anti-Semitism, it can flourish without Jews. Shakespeare's
poisonous depiction of the Jewish moneylender Shylock was written for
audiences that had never seen a Jew, all Jews having been expelled
from England more than 300 years earlier. Anti-Semitic bigotry infests
Saudi Arabia, where Jews have not dwelt in at least five centuries;
its malignance is suggested by the government daily Al-Riyadh, which
published an essay claiming that Jews have a taste for "pastries mixed
with human blood."
Esther Confounding Haman (Engraving by Gustave Doré, 1875)
There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the
king:
"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among ... all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it
be written that they be destroyed." After winning royal assent, Haman
makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and destroy all the Jews, the
young and the elderly, children and women, in one day . . . and to
take their property for plunder."
What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism -- just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the
Church or Islam, or their expulsion from so many lands in Europe and
the Middle East, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and
Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the
president of Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state,
when a leader of Hamas vows to kill Jewish children around the world,
when firebombs are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and
Chicago, it is not because Jews deserve to be victimized.
Some Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. The Jewish
people are the object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the
haters' rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What, after all, do those who vilify Jews as greedy
bankers have in common with those who revile them as seditious
Bolsheviks? Nothing, save an irrational obsession with Jews.
At one point in the book of Esther, Haman lets the mask slip. He
boasts to his friends and family of "the glory of his riches, and the
great number of his sons, and everything in which the king had
promoted him and elevated him." Still, he seethes with rage and
frustration: "Yet all this is worthless to me so long as I see
Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate." That is the
unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend in, to
abandon his values, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting
there -- undigested, unassimilated, and for that reason unbearable.
Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat; so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his national identity or his professional achievements.
Ultimately, however, it is the Jew's Jewishness, and the call to
higher standards that it represents, that the anti-Semite cannot
abide.
With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their
role in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures
too, as obsessive and indestructible -- and deadly -- as ever.
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)
The Revd
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sep 22, 11:57�am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:35:35 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Sep 22, 9:01 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Who is better than you.
>>
>> >> Impossible, gook. I'm WHITE.
>> > � That is just a superficial characteristic.
>>
>> It's the ONLY relevant characteristic, gook.
> Relevant for what purpose, nithing?
WE aks the questions, gook.
> By the way, Lawrence Russell Brewer is still dead and there is
>NOTHING that you can do about it.
So is Troy Davis and all the rectum sucking in the world won't change
that.
<gook repetition b'rissed>
The Peeler
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted again:
<snip our resident psychopath's usual hysterical and psychotic garbage>
Sooo proud of being a complete retard, The Rectum? Is there NOTHING else you
could be proud of? Obviously not! LOL
Michael Ejercito
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:40:02 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sep 22, 11:57 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:35:35 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > That is just a superficial characteristic.
>
> >> It's the ONLY relevant characteristic, gook.
> > Relevant for what purpose, nithing?
>
> WE aks the questions, gook.
>
> > By the way, Lawrence Russell Brewer is still dead and there is
> >NOTHING that you can do about it.
>
> So is Troy Davis and all the rectum sucking in the world won't change
> that.
Troy Davis got what was coming to him, just like Lawrence Brewer.
>
> <gook repetition b'rissed>
The following poem was dedicated to you.
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/msg/9a7063668ce49326
THE REVD WENT PODY BIG
The Revd went pody big in the street,
The Revd usually jacks his meat.
Oh that we gun him down,
Because he is a homosexual clown.
He’s a pedophile and an asshole to be,
His main pastime is playing with his pee-pee.
He smells like a sewer and farts real loud,
Of him the gays are very proud.
He molests his hand in an unnatural way.
That is why he’s a queer that is why he is gay.
Everybody hates his guts all the time,
In his ass he stuck a very ripe lime.
He’s a sodomite and a moron that needs to die,
He jacked-off in his mothers cherry pie.
He has zits and pimples all over his face,
He’s a monkey that was kicked out of the human race.
His penis is small,
Not big at all.
He’s an anti-Semitic prick,
With a midget dick.
So if you see the Revd do him one kind deed,
Kick him hard in the gut so out of his mouth he will bleed!
The Revd
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sep 23, 3:14 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:40:02 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Sep 22, 11:57 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:35:35 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > That is just a superficial characteristic.
>>
>> >> It's the ONLY relevant characteristic, gook.
>> > Relevant for what purpose, nithing?
>>
>> WE aks the questions, gook.
> Your failure to answer the question is noted, nithing.
>>
>> > By the way, Lawrence Russell Brewer is still dead and there is
>> >NOTHING that you can do about it.
>>
>> So is Troy Davis and all the rectum sucking in the world won't change
>> that.
> Troy Davis got what was coming to him, just like Lawrence Brewer.
The Peeler
farted again:
<snip our resident psychopath's usual hysterical and psychotic garbage>
Michael Ejercito
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:08:43 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sep 23, 3:14 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:40:02 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Relevant for what purpose, nithing?
>
> >> WE aks the questions, gook.
> > Your failure to answer the question is noted, nithing.
>
> Your failure to come up with original material is noted, gook.
>
>
>
> >> > By the way, Lawrence Russell Brewer is still dead and there is
> >> >NOTHING that you can do about it.
>
> >> So is Troy Davis and all the rectum sucking in the world won't change
> >> that.
> > Troy Davis got what was coming to him, just like Lawrence Brewer.
>
> YOU will get what's coming to you, gook: a face full of jew rectum.
The following Usenet post explains your sexual disorientation.
The following Usenet post explains your sexual disorientation.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism/msg/744028e4fe196d22
"Why do you think it constitutes animal abuse? If you or I tried to
fuck a cow, do you think the cow would even notice? It should not
only be legal but acceptable as a legitimate alternative lifestyle.
The fact is that animals are incapable of giving or refusing
consent. To imagine otherwise is a ridiculous anthropomorphism (look
it up, Levinstein). Do we ask animals for their consent before we
kill them and eat them? By comparison, getting fucked is a minor
inconvenience"- The Revd
The Revd
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sep 23, 11:52 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:08:43 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Sep 23, 3:14 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:40:02 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Relevant for what purpose, nithing?
>>
>> >> WE aks the questions, gook.
>> > Your failure to answer the question is noted, nithing.
>>
>> Your failure to come up with original material is noted, gook.
> The old material puts you in your place, boy.
Shabbat shalom, asshole!
<gook repetition b'rissed>
The Peeler
farted again:
>>>
>> The old material puts you in your place, boy.
>
> YOUR place is face to face with a jew rectum, gook.
> Shabbat shalom, asshole!
--
The top 5 truths about our resident psychopath, The Rectum:
the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
he can't get out of the house anymore,
he got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
he can't FUCK anymore,
he got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!