McCain Just Handed Obama The Presidency.
vivapa...@aol.com
just keep reminding myself that it's all a part of the prophetic
picture having to do with May 21, 2011.
Before today, I thought it odd that the Lord would put a stop to
things when a white man, a war vet at that, was at the helm.
But now both you and I see that Obama will win the Presidential
election, and that puts May 21, 2011 back in focus. Nothing but
disaster will result in having a President Obama in office. And he'll
be in office because people will trust Biden over Palin to step in
should something happen to the President. Remember that "... 3
a.m. ..." thing?
I'll be voting for Obama, and I'm glad to be making a contribution to
Bible prophecy. :-)
Mirelle
wrote:
Here is the real truth of the choice America has for president:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/30013137@N05/2808946763/
Mirelle
LC
<vivapa...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:5d915c4d-93a1-4646...@v13g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> It's very tempting to be surprised at McCain's V.P. choice. But I
> just keep reminding myself that it's all a part of the prophetic
> picture having to do with May 21, 2011.
> Before today, I thought it odd that the Lord would put a stop to
> things when a white man, a war vet at that, was at the helm.
Of course you would.
> But now both you and I see that Obama will win the Presidential
> election, and that puts May 21, 2011 back in focus. Nothing but
> disaster will result in having a President Obama in office.
Look up "disaster", and you'll find a picture of Shrub.
> And he'll be in office because people will trust Biden over Palin to step
> in should something happen to the President. Remember that "... 3 a.m.
> ..." thing?
Given McSame's Ambien comsumption, Palin might be a safer choice for that
hypothetical call.
> I'll be voting for Obama, and I'm glad to be making a contribution to
> Bible prophecy. :-)
"Contribution", you say?
So here's your challenge, faux padre: Are you ready to put your $ where you
mouth is?
I've got $10,000 that says May 22, 2011 is just another day- just like *all
the other days* have been- following the predictions of end-times crackpots.
I mean, you're not just another religious lunatic that doesn't actually
believe the tripe you post, are you?
Pony up, cowboy.
LC~ Will give the faux padre time to pray on the matter.
"Faith is believing in something you know ain't so" - Mark Twain
bear
wrote:
I am not the author of this memo and cannot validate it’s accuracy but
most, if not all of it, seems quite plausible to me. It may be
something to keep in mind when one votes.
Congress Military
John McCain 26 Years 22 Years
Barrack Obama 143 days 0
Just think how great a professional of any kind you could be with only
143 days of experience!!!
People want change so badly? . . . . maybe we should lower the
experience requirement for doctors, lawyers, airline pilots, etc. This
would cause some change!
Obama's 143 Days of Senate Experience
Just how much Senate experience does Barack Obama have in terms of
actual work days? Not much.
From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United States Senator, to
the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory
Committee, he logged 143 days of experience in the Senate.
That's how many days the Senate was actually in session and working.
The one single Senate committee that he headed never even met -- once.
After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be
Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of
Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan.
Think about it.......143 days -- 20.4 weeks -- 4.7 months .
Our children spend more time in pre-school getting ready for
kindergarten.
Josef Balluch
...
> I'll be voting for Obama, and I'm glad to be making a contribution to
> Bible prophecy. :-)
You have also made a great contribution to our amusement here in a.a, which
will continue until Oct. 22, 2011.
Keep up the good work, padre!
Regards,
Josef
We do not have to visit a madhouse to find disordered minds; our
planet is the mental institution of the universe.
-- Goethe
Al Smith
It's not so much McCain handing Obama the presidency. It's more a
matter of the presidency being a hot potato that they are tossing
back and forth, neither one willing to hold onto it for long.
-Al-
Cary Kittrell
> It's very tempting to be surprised at McCain's V.P. choice. But I
> just keep reminding myself that it's all a part of the prophetic
> picture having to do with May 21, 2011.
>
> Before today, I thought it odd that the Lord would put a stop to
> things when a white man, a war vet at that, was at the helm.
True. Because everybody knows that God, He just looooves
white folks best.
God? Your, um, your "sheets" are back from the laundromat...
-- cary
John Manning
> On Aug 29, 5:15 pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>> It's very tempting to be surprised at McCain's V.P. choice. But I
>> just keep reminding myself that it's all a part of the prophetic
>> picture having to do with May 21, 2011.
>>
>> Before today, I thought it odd that the Lord would put a stop to
>> things when a white man, a war vet at that, was at the helm.
>>
>> But now both you and I see that Obama will win the Presidential
>> election, and that puts May 21, 2011 back in focus. Nothing but
>> disaster will result in having a President Obama in office. And he'll
>> be in office because people will trust Biden over Palin to step in
>> should something happen to the President. Remember that "... 3
>> a.m. ..." thing?
>>
>> I'll be voting for Obama, and I'm glad to be making a contribution to
>> Bible prophecy. :-)
>
> I am not the author of this memo and cannot validate it’s accuracy but
> most, if not all of it, seems quite plausible to me. It may be
> something to keep in mind when one votes.
>
>
> Congress Military
> John McCain 26 Years 22 Years
>
>
> Barrack Obama 143 days 0
"What does it say about your judgment when you think George Bush has
been right more than 90% of the time?"
McCain’s reputation as a war hero rests on the sum total of 20 hours in
combat. That’s right. McCain spent only 20 hours in combat in the entire
war. He flew 23 missions. He got 28 medals. In other words, he got more
medals than he had missions. Not bad. It should be noted that none of
McCain’s medals related to anything he did in combat. They were given
for the supposed bravery he displayed after he had been shot down and
captured.
It’s appropriate to ask whether McCain’s shoot-down was caused by bad
luck or simple incompetence on his part. Of course, there is no way to
answer definitively. But we can form an assessment based on the rest of
McCain’s military record. At the Naval Academy, McCain graduated almost
bottom of his class. He was 894th out of 899.
McCain lost many aircraft over the course of his military career – five
in total. Most pilots who lost aircraft at the rate McCain did would
have been kicked out of the service. But McCain had protection from up
on high. His father was an admiral. He was an untouchable. So McCain
blundered his way through his military career until he was finally shot
down.
WATCH VIDEO - The Real McCain: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEtZlR3zp4c
=====
Barack Obama: Two years in the U.S. Senate. Seven years in the Illinois
Senate. One loss in a primary election for the U.S. House of
Representatives.
Obama's experience is broader than his time in elected office. He was
a community organizer in Chicago and led voter-registration drives. He
taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago. He lived for a
time in Indonesia, a Muslim country. He has traveled to the Middle
East, Africa and Iraq.
"He has lived abroad and has relatives who are certainly not your
Mayflower Americans and understands different cultures," Dillard says.
"Many presidents with foreign-policy experience have not lived
firsthand the type of life that Barack has."
USA TODAY: http://tinyurl.com/3xjseb
Kate
Experience at what - presidency? Ruling a state, city, county?
McCain has none of those and has shown his oh so lack of even
temprament, so we know his skill at diplomacy will be little at best.
And McCain has already admitted he don't know nothing about economics
and he's planning to outsource that little subject to an expert he has
no way of knowing has any wisdom at all.
You have foolish priorities.
bear
You make note of the “experience” McCain lacks, “Ruling a state, city,
county”, why not list the “experience” that Obama has?
Does he have experience “ruling a state, a city or a county”? If he
does, could you provide some proof?
Is it your contention that anyone who lacks an “even temperament” is
incapable of possessing diplomacy skills? And if so, could you explain
why?
> And McCain has already admitted he don't know nothing about economics
> and he's planning to outsource that little subject to an expert he has
> no way of knowing has any wisdom at all.
Wow, honesty from a politician, now that is a radical position.
Perhaps he is smart enough to have the awareness of, accept his
limitations, and enlist the services of those who are experts in their
fields.
Could you list the qualifications in economics that Senator Obama
brings to the office?
Since this is primarily a Bible discussion group, how do you feel
about Senator Obama making fun of the Bible?
>
> You have foolish priorities. - Hide quoted text -
>
And what do you think my “priorities” are?
BTW, I am not a fan of McCain, I just trust the picks for judges that
he will make more than I do his opponent.
> - Show quoted text -
bear
> bear wrote:
> > On Aug 29, 5:15 pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>
> > wrote:
> >> It's very tempting to be surprised at McCain's V.P. choice. But I
>
> > most, if not all of it, seems quite plausible to me. It may be
> > something to keep in mind when one votes.
>
> > Congress Military
> > John McCain 26 Years 22 Years
>
> > Barrack Obama 143 days 0
>
> "What does it say about your judgment when you think George Bush has
> been right more than 90% of the time?"
>
>
that I have ever written about George Bush?
So would you care to explain how you make such a dogmatic statement
about what you know absolutely nothing about?
For me, when you make those kinds of unsubstantiated accusations, then
that makes the balance of your “opinions” suspect.
John Manning
> On Aug 29, 6:27 pm, John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>> bear wrote:
>>> On Aug 29, 5:15 pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> It's very tempting to be surprised at McCain's V.P. choice. But I
>>> I am not the author of this memo and cannot validate it’s accuracy but
>>> most, if not all of it, seems quite plausible to me. It may be
>>> something to keep in mind when one votes.
>>> Congress Military
>>> John McCain 26 Years 22 Years
>>> Barrack Obama 143 days 0
>> "What does it say about your judgment when you think George Bush has
>> been right more than 90% of the time?"
>>
>>
> What does it say about your opinion when you have never seen one word
> that I have ever written about George Bush?
That was a comment about John McCain, Bozo.
> So would you care to explain how you make such a dogmatic statement
> about what you know absolutely nothing about?
>
> For me, when you make those kinds of unsubstantiated accusations, then
> that makes the balance of your “opinions” suspect.
Go back to playing in the toilet, little man.
•R. L. Measures
** Chortle. The Jehovahs Witnesses somewhat less than successfully
predicted the End in 1914, 1915, 1917, 1925, 1942, and 1975.
--
R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
bear
> bear wrote:
> > On Aug 29, 6:27 pm, John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> >> bear wrote:
> >>> On Aug 29, 5:15 pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> It's very tempting to be surprised at McCain's V.P. choice. But I
> >>> I am not the author of this memo and cannot validate it’s accuracy but
> >>> most, if not all of it, seems quite plausible to me. It may be
> >>> something to keep in mind when one votes.
> >>> Congress Military
> >>> John McCain 26 Years 22 Years
> >>> Barrack Obama 143 days 0
> >> "What does it say about your judgment when you think George Bush has
> >> been right more than 90% of the time?"
>
> > What does it say about your opinion when you have never seen one word
> > that I have ever written about George Bush?
>
> That was a comment about John McCain, Bozo.
My apologizes, I misread your intentions. I made a mistake and i am
sorry.
>
> > So would you care to explain how you make such a dogmatic statement
> > about what you know absolutely nothing about?
>
> > For me, when you make those kinds of unsubstantiated accusations, then
> > that makes the balance of your “opinions” suspect.
>
> Go back to playing in the toilet, little man.- Hide quoted text -
Jake Horn
"bear" <tevan...@charter.net> wrote in message
news:1a7011dc-6ea7-4914...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 29, 6:49 pm, cob...@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:36:54 -0700 (PDT), bear
>Could you list the qualifications in economics that Senator Obama
> brings to the office?
He wants to raise taxes. For a Democrat, that's qualification enough.
> Since this is primarily a Bible discussion group, how do you feel
> about Senator Obama making fun of the Bible?
Maybe we should ask his mentor, Rev Wright
- Jake
V
"Mirelle" <anam...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8c468657-e1a2-4727...@q26g2000prq.googlegroups.com...
Kate
Because you presented Obama as not having experience.
I pointed out that he has just as much experience as McCain.
Did that totally fly over your head?
>
>Does he have experience “ruling a state, a city or a county”? If he
>does, could you provide some proof?
Could you explain why you would ask such a foolish question?
>
>Is it your contention that anyone who lacks an “even temperament” is
>incapable of possessing diplomacy skills? And if so, could you explain
>why?
Could you explain why you think someone who flys off the handle
constantly for no reason is adequate for the incredibly delicate job
of negotiating state diplomacy?
>
>> And McCain has already admitted he don't know nothing about economics
>> and he's planning to outsource that little subject to an expert he has
>> no way of knowing has any wisdom at all.
>
>Wow, honesty from a politician, now that is a radical position.
>Perhaps he is smart enough to have the awareness of, accept his
>limitations, and enlist the services of those who are experts in their
>fields.
He's admitted his limitations where most republicans would not - let's
take his word for it - he's not qualified.
>
>Could you list the qualifications in economics that Senator Obama
>brings to the office?
Here Darlin - his position on the subject. Read for yourself - I
don't think - "I don't know anything about that hard subject is among
them. "
>
>Since this is primarily a Bible discussion group, how do you feel
>about Senator Obama making fun of the Bible?
I'm an atheist dea. We have real morals. We don't have to rely on
someone's made up story to tell me what's right and wrong.
Now why would I be bothered about Obama making fun of a book of
myths? But I've not heard that he had. My guess is that you decided
to believe a little republican propaganda.
hmmmm?
I bet you like lies that make you feel just so good about hating
people.
>
>>
>> You have foolish priorities. - Hide quoted text -
>>
>
>And what do you think my “priorities” are?
That work days in the Senate is real important to you for a president.
I guess you probably prefer Teddy Kennedy.
But do try again telling us what's really important, maybe you can
impress me.
I'm betting not.
>
>BTW, I am not a fan of McCain, I just trust the picks for judges that
>he will make more than I do his opponent.
So far the republicans have made total fools out of themselves with
their picks that obviously don't know a damn thing about
constitutional law and think that they can pretend religion is
supposed to be a part of goverment. No doubt you think we can have
some more of that with McCain - - but bad for the country, bad for
the people. All people - even Christians who can't think things
through.
Linda Lee
And since McCain has chosen a woman with admittedly two years
experince as his VP running mate, if old, old old McCain were to die
in office, we'd have a unknown woman with very little experience as
our Prez.
I guess you like sky-high gas prices and a crap economy because of
billions of dollars spent on a war that's lining the pockets of Cheney
who is involved with the companies used to 'rebuild' the Iraq they've
helped destroy.
Don't be so dumb.
MrUniverse
wrote:
I'm surprised to still find innocent people who think that the US
presidential show is a real stuff.
wake up!
Linda Lee
Of course someone (McCain) without an even temperament is not in
control of their emotions and would be a lousy diplomat.
>
> You make note of the “experience” McCain lacks, “Ruling a state, city,
> county”, why not list the “experience” that Obama has?
>
> Does he have experience “ruling a state, a city or a county”? If he
> does, could you provide some proof?
What did old, old, old McCain ever run?
>
> Is it your contention that anyone who lacks an “even temperament” is
> incapable of possessing diplomacy skills? And if so, could you explain
> why?
>
> > And McCain has already admitted he don't know nothing about economics
> > and he's planning to outsource that little subject to an expert he has
> > no way of knowing has any wisdom at all.
No comment to that huh, since you like our crap economy just like it
is.
>
>
> Since this is primarily a Bible discussion group, how do you feel
> about Senator Obama making fun of the Bible?
More Republican (and atheist) manipulative lies. You're an atheist, so
what do you care? I'm a Christian, and I've told jokes about the
Bible and biblical characters; it means nothing about my views, it
just shows I'm not so touchy about the subject I can't joke about it.
>
>
>
> > You have foolish priorities. - Hide quoted text -
>
> And what do you think my “priorities” are?
Bad economy, war-mongering, money-grubbing...
>
> BTW, I am not a fan of McCain, I just trust the picks for judges that
> he will make more than I do his opponent.
What?
Linda Lee
> bear wrote:
> > On Aug 29, 6:27 pm, John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> >> bear wrote:
> >>> On Aug 29, 5:15 pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> It's very tempting to be surprised at McCain's V.P. choice. But I
> >>> I am not the author of this memo and cannot validate it’s accuracy but
> >>> most, if not all of it, seems quite plausible to me. It may be
> >>> something to keep in mind when one votes.
> >>> Congress Military
> >>> John McCain 26 Years 22 Years
> >>> Barrack Obama 143 days 0
> >> "What does it say about your judgment when you think George Bush has
> >> been right more than 90% of the time?"
>
> > What does it say about your opinion when you have never seen one word
> > that I have ever written about George Bush?
>
> That was a comment about John McCain, Bozo.
McCain voted in agreement with George W. Bush 95% of the time.
McCain would do nothing about Bush's damage to the U.S. economy, or
his damage to our current image as warmongers to other countries in
the world. Do you really think the U.S. will never suffer a nuclear
attack when George Bush is the most hated president world-wide we've
ever had and has made us the most hated country in the world?
Linda Lee
> "bear" <tevans9...@charter.net> wrote in message
>
> news:1a7011dc-6ea7-4914...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 29, 6:49 pm, cob...@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:36:54 -0700 (PDT), bear
> >Could you list the qualifications in economics that Senator Obama
> > brings to the office?
>
> He wants to raise taxes.
Taxes for the rich (have a problem with that?). Lower taxes for the
common man (have a problem with that?).
For a Democrat, that's qualification enough.
>
> > Since this is primarily a Bible discussion group, how do you feel
> > about Senator Obama making fun of the Bible?
>
> Maybe we should ask his mentor, Rev Wright
Whom Obama denounced. Rev. Wright is old and getting senile and is
evidencing that by his inappropriate comments.
>
> - Jake
Linda Lee
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:36:10 -0700 (PDT), bear
>
>
>
Bear is an atheist and is (like all Republicans) manipulatively using
religion in this discussion simply because he wants a Republican for
Prez, a bad economy and endless war.
Mirelle
> No choice.
Exactly.
> "Mirelle" <anamin...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Linda Lee
> bear wrote:
> > On Aug 29, 6:27 pm, John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> >>
> >> "What does it say about your judgment when you think George Bush has
> >> been right more than 90% of the time?"
>
> > What does it say about your opinion when you have never seen one word
> > that I have ever written about George Bush?
>
> That was a comment about John McCain, Bozo.
I'm definitely voting for Barack Obama. I am tired of the glaring evil
evident in the Republican party, evil evidenced lately (on a daily
basis) by their lies against their political opponents, a long-held
tradition for them.
Today I ran into someone (a stranger) who brought up Obama. I said,
"I'm voting for him". Looking actually frightened, he said 'If you
do, it will be the same as voting for terrorism; he has ties to
terrorism' [This ("ties to terrorism") is a current McCain scare
tactics LIE, being told in the form of political ads accusing Obama
(who had been an eight-year old child at the time of this man's
crimes) of being friends with a man who had once long ago attacked the
capital. I just looked at him. A minute later, I said, "Speaking of
terrorism, Bush's first act after 9/11 was to protect Osama ben
Ladin's family by whisking them out of the USA, an odd reaction with
thousands of Americans lying dead under the rubble of the Twin
Towers." He didn't argue, because we were all informed of this the
week the Twin Towers were destroyed. Then he started saying maybe
they all have ties to terrorism.
If they want to tell lies about Obama's alleged ties to terrorism,
McCain's ties to Bush (who we all know protected the family of a
terrorist (Osama ben Ladin) before ever responding to many thousands
of Americans who became victims of this terrorism, both the victims
themselves and their families and friends) should be highlighted and
McCain's voting record demonstrates he is closely aligned with Bush.
The Republicans are for the rich, not the common people of the USA.
McCain's ads that Barack Obama will raise taxes leave out the very
important fact (to most of us) that Obama says he will raise taxes for
the rich who outsource jobs to other countries, and will LOWER taxes
for the common middle-income person.
To HELL with McCain. He is as evil as his mentor. The USA needs to
*** WAKE UP *** and quit letting the Republican party MANIPULATE us
with their EVIL LIES by which they've remained in power for years.
WAKE UP PEOPLE BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE FOR US AND THE REPUBLICANS
SUBJECT US TO A NUCLEAR ATTACK FROM THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD WHO HAVE
COME TO HATE THE USA WITH A PASSION SINCE THE BUSHES OBTAINED POWER
OVER US.
Take back our country, a country that was supposed to be founded and
established FOR THE PEOPLE - NOT for the RICH ONLY.
VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA.
VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA.
VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA.
>
Al Smith
> his damage to our current image as warmongers to other countries in
> the world. Do you really think the U.S. will never suffer a nuclear
> attack when George Bush is the most hated president world-wide we've
> ever had and has made us the most hated country in the world?
Israel is the most hated country in the world. The USA is second.
-Al-
Linda Lee
Israel is your most hated country in the world; we're all aware the
world's most hated country is the USA.
•R. L. Measures
<86a7c111-db76-4182...@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, Linda
Lee <lyndal...@juno.com> wrote:
> On Aug 29, 11:06=A0pm, "Jake Horn" <Jake.Horn...@Gmail.com> wrote:
> > "bear" <tevans9...@charter.net> wrote in message
> >
> > news:1a7011dc-6ea7-4914...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> > On Aug 29, 6:49 pm, cob...@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:36:54 -0700 (PDT), bear
> > >Could you list the qualifications in economics that Senator Obama
> > > brings to the office?
> >
> > He wants to raise taxes.
>
> Taxes for the rich (have a problem with that?). Lower taxes for the
> common man (have a problem with that?).
>
> =A0 For a Democrat, that's qualification enough.
> >
> > > Since this is primarily a Bible discussion group, how do you feel
> > > about Senator Obama making fun of the Bible?
> >
> > Maybe we should ask his mentor, Rev Wright
>
> Whom Obama denounced. Rev. Wright is old and getting senile and is
> evidencing that by his inappropriate comments.
>
** Wright strikes me as a person who craves attention to the point that
he will say whatever it takes to get another dose.
duke
Haahaahaahaahaa. Yaayaayaayaayaayaa.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
John Manning
*EXCELLENT* Linda.
Just Wondering
>
> I guess you like sky-high gas prices and a crap economy
Do you seriously think Barak Hussein has any idea of how to improve gas
prices and the economy, or would have the actual ability to do that? If
so, what facts do you base your opinions on?
panam...@hotmail.com
> On Aug 29, 5:15 pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>
snip
> After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be
> Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of
> Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan.
Adding Ronald <spit> Regan to that list is like adding Ted Bundy to a
list of great romantic leading men.
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
Christopher A. Lee
wrote:
If American Presidents are the leader of the free world, why doesn't
the free world get to vote?
When the Reagan administration objected to Western Europe getting
natural gas from Siberia, a spokesman (Eagleton or Eagleburger, I
always confused the two) complained that America was the leader of the
free world, so the free world should do what America said.
He didn't realise the irony.
Douglas Berry
<fmh...@comcast.net> carved the following into the hard stone of
alt.atheism
Try reading. Not just the bullet points, but actually read the policy.
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/newenergy
Oh, any reason you use his middle name instead of his last name?
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
Mark K. Bilbo
> It's very tempting to be surprised at McCain's V.P. choice. But I
> just keep reminding myself that it's all a part of the prophetic
> picture having to do with May 21, 2011.
>
> Before today, I thought it odd that the Lord would put a stop to
> things when a white man, a war vet at that, was at the helm.
>
> But now both you and I see that Obama will win the Presidential
> election, and that puts May 21, 2011 back in focus. Nothing but
> disaster will result in having a President Obama in office. And he'll
> be in office because people will trust Biden over Palin to step in
> should something happen to the President. Remember that "... 3
> a.m. ..." thing?
>
> I'll be voting for Obama, and I'm glad to be making a contribution to
> Bible prophecy. :-)
You're going to be *so* red in the face when I throw this one back at
you in 2012...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion #1423
------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not good or real... I'm evil, and imaginary.
-- Karen Walker
Free Lunch
wrote in alt.atheism:
>vivapa...@aol.com wrote:
>> It's very tempting to be surprised at McCain's V.P. choice. But I
>> just keep reminding myself that it's all a part of the prophetic
>> picture having to do with May 21, 2011.
>>
>> Before today, I thought it odd that the Lord would put a stop to
>> things when a white man, a war vet at that, was at the helm.
>>
>> But now both you and I see that Obama will win the Presidential
>> election, and that puts May 21, 2011 back in focus. Nothing but
>> disaster will result in having a President Obama in office. And he'll
>> be in office because people will trust Biden over Palin to step in
>> should something happen to the President. Remember that "... 3
>> a.m. ..." thing?
>>
>> I'll be voting for Obama, and I'm glad to be making a contribution to
>> Bible prophecy. :-)
>
>
>You're going to be *so* red in the face when I throw this one back at
>you in 2012...
You know how it is, Mark, religious nuts will always find an explanation
for the failure of their next prediction. They have done so for
thousands of years and the followers are still too stupid to catch on.
Kate
>vivapa...@aol.com wrote:
>> It's very tempting to be surprised at McCain's V.P. choice. But I
>> just keep reminding myself that it's all a part of the prophetic
>> picture having to do with May 21, 2011.
>>
>> Before today, I thought it odd that the Lord would put a stop to
>> things when a white man, a war vet at that, was at the helm.
>>
>> But now both you and I see that Obama will win the Presidential
>> election, and that puts May 21, 2011 back in focus. Nothing but
>> disaster will result in having a President Obama in office. And he'll
>> be in office because people will trust Biden over Palin to step in
>> should something happen to the President. Remember that "... 3
>> a.m. ..." thing?
>>
>> I'll be voting for Obama, and I'm glad to be making a contribution to
>> Bible prophecy. :-)
>
>
>You're going to be *so* red in the face when I throw this one back at
>you in 2012...
So Mark,
What's your take on 'why McCain picked this neophyte?
A.G.O.G.
>
>
>So Mark,
> What's your take on why McCain picked this neophyte?
A seasoned Republican politician would be more capable than an Alaskan soccer
mom at exploiting the power machinery that Cheney installed and that will still
largely be in place when he leaves office. McCain wants to rule absolutely.
johac
<14e20a37-a483-4b4f...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
panam...@hotmail.com wrote:
And as far as Lincoln, as also pointed ot last week at the convention,
Lincoln had LESS experience than Obama when he took office:
And I seem to recall that Lincoln did OK as Commander in Chief.
>
> -Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
> aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
--
John #1782
Jake Horn
"johac" <jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-26D49...@news.giganews.com...
He didn't survive it
- Jake
unsurrea...@yahoo.com
Yes. It's easy to hate the most powerful country in the world. Too
bad we are.
•R. L. Measures
<jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> In article
> <14e20a37-a483-4b4f...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> panam...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Aug 29, 6:36 pm, bear <tevans9...@charter.net> wrote:
> > > On Aug 29, 5:15 pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>
> >
> > snip
> >
> > > After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be
> > > Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of
> > > Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan.
> >
> > Adding Ronald <spit> Regan to that list is like adding Ted Bundy to a
> > list of great romantic leading men.
>
>
> And as far as Lincoln, as also pointed ot last week at the convention,
> Lincoln had LESS experience than Obama when he took office:
>
• Good point. Also, W. had little experience in this area prior to 2001.
•R. L. Measures
<f762b822-98eb-4cbc...@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
unsurrea...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Aug 30, 2:42=A0am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 30, 2:28=A0am, Al Smith <inva...@address.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > McCain would do nothing about Bush's damage to the U.S. economy, or
> > > > his damage to our current image as warmongers to other countries in
> > > > the world. Do you really think the U.S. will never suffer a nuclear
> > > > attack when George Bush is the most hated president world-wide we've
> > > > ever had and has made us the most hated country in the world?
> >
> > > Israel is the most hated country in the world. The USA is second.
> >
> > > -Al-
> >
> > Israel is your most hated country in the world; we're all aware the
> > world's most hated country is the USA.
>
> Yes. It's easy to hate the most powerful country in the world. Too
> bad we are.
** W. has succeeded brilliantly in exacerbating the problem during the
last 7 years.
Kate
Al Smith
Israel is more hated than America. All Muslims around the world hate
Israel, and that's a lot of Muslims.
-Al-
johac
But if W. had been elected in 1860, today we'd all be whistling Dixie.
--
John #1782
johac
"Jake Horn" <Jake.H...@Gmail.com> wrote:
His death was tragic, but he won the war and kept the nation together.
>
> - Jake
--
John #1782
Don Ocean
But only at the cost of states rights and at the behest of big Northern
Corporations.
Don Ocean
More likely speaking Lakota/Sioux.
•R. L. Measures
<jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> In article <r-3108080301360001@r-ls-mac-mini>,
> r...@somis.org (•R. L. Measures) wrote:
>
> > In article <jhachmann-26D49...@news.giganews.com>, johac
> > <jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >
> > > In article
> > > <14e20a37-a483-4b4f...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > panam...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Aug 29, 6:36 pm, bear <tevans9...@charter.net> wrote:
> > > > > On Aug 29, 5:15 pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>
> > > >
> > > > snip
> > > >
> > > > > After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be
> > > > > Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of
> > > > > Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan.
> > > >
> > > > Adding Ronald <spit> Regan to that list is like adding Ted Bundy to a
> > > > list of great romantic leading men.
> > >
> > >
> > > And as far as Lincoln, as also pointed ot last week at the convention,
> > > Lincoln had LESS experience than Obama when he took office:
> > >
> > • Good point. Also, W. had little experience in this area prior to 2001.
>
> But if W. had been elected in 1860, today we'd all be whistling Dixie.
• Maybe, but with the industrial strength of the country lying mostly in
the Abolitionist North-East, it's not a certainty.
Kenny McCormack
R. L. Measures <r...@somis.org> wrote:
...
>> But if W. had been elected in 1860, today we'd all be whistling Dixie.
>
>• Maybe, but with the industrial strength of the country lying mostly in
>the Abolitionist North-East, it's not a certainty.
But those people didn't vote for W.
Herman Rubin
johac <jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>In article <oqudnUMnwp9JrifV...@comcast.com>,
> "Jake Horn" <Jake.H...@Gmail.com> wrote:
>> "johac" <jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>> news:jhachmann-26D49...@news.giganews.com...
>> > In article
>> > <14e20a37-a483-4b4f...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
>> > panam...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> >> On Aug 29, 6:36 pm, bear <tevans9...@charter.net> wrote:
>> >> > On Aug 29, 5:15 pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>
snip
>> > And as far as Lincoln, as also pointed ot last week at the convention,
>> > Lincoln had LESS experience than Obama when he took office:
>> > http://tinyurl.com/6k2hhx
>> > And I seem to recall that Lincoln did OK as Commander in Chief.
He did not do well as Commander in Chief. He kept appointing
incompetent generals to the troops in Virginia; good generals
would have ended the war years sooner.
Grant was a good general, not a great one. Even he did not
end it as quickly as it could have been done.
--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hru...@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
Lord Calvert
> In article <r-3108080301360001@r-ls-mac-mini>,
> r...@somis.org (•R. L. Measures) wrote:
>
>
>
> > <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > > In article
> > > <14e20a37-a483-4b4f-b899-b9bf2e07a...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 29, 6:36 pm, bear <tevans9...@charter.net> wrote:
> > > > > On Aug 29, 5:15 pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>
>
> > > > snip
>
> > > > > After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be
> > > > > Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of
> > > > > Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan.
>
> > > > Adding Ronald <spit> Regan to that list is like adding Ted Bundy to a
> > > > list of great romantic leading men.
>
> > > And as far as Lincoln, as also pointed ot last week at the convention,
> > > Lincoln had LESS experience than Obama when he took office:
>
> > • Good point. Also, W. had little experience in this area prior to 2001.
>
> But if W. had been elected in 1860, today we'd all be whistling Dixie.
Not only that but he would have armed them and given them a welcoming
committee when they reached the Capitol Dome, just like he did when he
sent $43 million to the Taliban months before 9/11 and later armed the
Mujahedeen al-Khalq in Iraq, which was what kick-started the attacks
on American troops...not to mention his buddy-buddy relationship with
the terrorist dictator whose intelligence agency helped fund 9/11.
Rich Goranson
Amherst, NY, USA
aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1
EAC Department of Cruel and Unusual Choreography
•R. L. Measures
(Kenny McCormack) wrote:
• There must be some pretty old voters in the Northeast.
John Baker
wrote:
>In article <g9gptu$6mb$2...@news.xmission.com>, gaz...@shell.xmission.com
Oh, yeah. Some of them served with Washington. <G>
Lord Calvert
> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:16:36 -0700, r...@somis.org (•R. L. Measures)
> wrote:
>
> >(Kenny McCormack) wrote:
>
> >> In article <r-0109080153090001@r-ls-mac-mini>,
> >> R. L. Measures <r...@somis.org> wrote:
> >> ...
> >> >> But if W. had been elected in 1860, today we'd all be whistling Dixie.
>
> >> >• Maybe, but with the industrial strength of the country lying mostly in
> >> >the Abolitionist North-East, it's not a certainty.
>
> >> But those people didn't vote for W.
>
> >• There must be some pretty old voters in the Northeast.
>
> Oh, yeah. Some of them served with Washington. <G>
Dunno. Bush's ilk probably served with Cornwallis instead. The Tory
position is much more their style.
•R. L. Measures
johac
hru...@odds.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) wrote:
> In article <jhachmann-89C13...@news.giganews.com>,
> johac <jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >In article <oqudnUMnwp9JrifV...@comcast.com>,
> > "Jake Horn" <Jake.H...@Gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> "johac" <jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> >> news:jhachmann-26D49...@news.giganews.com...
> >> > In article
> >> > <14e20a37-a483-4b4f...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> >> > panam...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >> >> On Aug 29, 6:36 pm, bear <tevans9...@charter.net> wrote:
> >> >> > On Aug 29, 5:15 pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>
>
> snip
>
>
>
> >> > And as far as Lincoln, as also pointed ot last week at the convention,
> >> > Lincoln had LESS experience than Obama when he took office:
>
> >> > http://tinyurl.com/6k2hhx
>
> >> > And I seem to recall that Lincoln did OK as Commander in Chief.
>
> He did not do well as Commander in Chief. He kept appointing
> incompetent generals to the troops in Virginia; good generals
> would have ended the war years sooner.
>
> Grant was a good general, not a great one. Even he did not
> end it as quickly as it could have been done.
Nevertheless, he did win.
--
John #1782
johac
<b1d08a8f-9a64-4bc9...@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
Lord Calvert <Calver...@msn.com> wrote:
No kidding. We're lucky we're not all speaking Arabic.
>
--
John #1782
johac
r...@somis.org (•R. L. Measures) wrote:
> In article <jhachmann-9706F...@news.giganews.com>, johac
> <jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > In article <r-3108080301360001@r-ls-mac-mini>,
> > r...@somis.org (•R. L. Measures) wrote:
> >
> > > In article <jhachmann-26D49...@news.giganews.com>, johac
> > > <jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article
> > > > <14e20a37-a483-4b4f...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > panam...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Aug 29, 6:36 pm, bear <tevans9...@charter.net> wrote:
> > > > > > On Aug 29, 5:15 pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > snip
> > > > >
> > > > > > After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be
> > > > > > Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of
> > > > > > Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan.
> > > > >
> > > > > Adding Ronald <spit> Regan to that list is like adding Ted Bundy to a
> > > > > list of great romantic leading men.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And as far as Lincoln, as also pointed ot last week at the convention,
> > > > Lincoln had LESS experience than Obama when he took office:
> > > >
> > > • Good point. Also, W. had little experience in this area prior to 2001.
> >
> > But if W. had been elected in 1860, today we'd all be whistling Dixie.
>
> • Maybe, but with the industrial strength of the country lying mostly in
> the Abolitionist North-East, it's not a certainty.
He's find a way to squander that too. He'd outsource our industry to
some other country.
--
John #1782
johac
Don Ocean <oc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Wouldn't surprise me either. "Hey Dubya! How's General Custer's 'surge'
working out?"
--
John #1782
elray999
> So would you care to explain how you make such a dogmatic statement
> about what you know absolutely nothing about?
"hello... department of redundancy department"
L.
•R. L. Measures
<jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
• Ths has already happened.
johac
Today. I was imaginining waht would happen if W were president in
Lincoln's time.
--
John #1782
bob young
"A.G.O.G." wrote:
> In article <48ece0d1....@news-west.newscene.com>, Kate says...
> >
> >
> >So Mark,
> > What's your take on why McCain picked this neophyte?
>
> A seasoned Republican politician would be more capable than an Alaskan soccer
> mom at exploiting the power machinery that Cheney installed and that will still
> largely be in place when he leaves office. McCain wants to rule absolutely.
.......and going by what I saw on CNN here in Asia this morning, with the help of
an invisible god - the entire audience at the Rep Convention, heads bowed, praying
to an imaginary deity for help to win an election. If the upper echelon of the
Chinese government happened to be watching at the time, they would all have had a
hearty belly laugh.
Chinese minister to all "Hey how long is it they say it will take before the PRC
is the most powerful country in the word? Twenty years time? Make that fifteen"
I didn't laugh......................... I groaned.
Bob
Humanist, atheist, realist, sentimentalist, Brit.
Man creates his gods in his own image;
and then wastes the rest of his life
manipulating them to his heart's content.
Michelle Malkin
"johac" <jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-C28AD...@news.giganews.com...
We'd probably belong to England again.
At the time of the Civil War, England really
was hoping for the US to split up, so they
could take over again. They were very
sneakily helping the South to further these
hopes.Then again, the one thing that could
have brought the country back together again
back then could have been another British
invasion. Problem is, though, knowing W, he'd
most likely have been working with the Brits,
just as the current version and his family have
been working with the Saudis for decades.
•R. L. Measures
<jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
• Scary
•R. L. Measures
Malkin" <hypa...@comcast.net> wrote:
** Good point. Like thieves, oil men stick together.
Al Smith
>> > Lincoln's time.
>
> • Scary
You mean the part about him getting shot in the head? Somehow that
doesn't bother me.
-Al-
Alex W.
"Michelle Malkin" <hypa...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:zaGdnfim0rp-rSPV...@comcast.com...
>
>
> "johac" <jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:jhachmann-C28AD...@news.giganews.com...
>> In article <r-0209080320160001@r-ls-mac-mini>,
>>
>>> In article <jhachmann-C9D61...@news.giganews.com>, johac
>>> <jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> > In article <r-0109080153090001@r-ls-mac-mini>,
>>> >
>>> > > In article <jhachmann-9706F...@news.giganews.com>,
>>> > > johac
>>> > > <jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > In article <r-3108080301360001@r-ls-mac-mini>,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > In article <jhachmann-26D49...@news.giganews.com>,
>>> > > > > johac
>>> > > > > <jhac...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > In article
>>> > > > > > <14e20a37-a483-4b4f...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
>>> > > > > > panam...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > On Aug 29, 6:36 pm, bear <tevans9...@charter.net> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > On Aug 29, 5:15 pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com"
>>> > > > > > > > <vivapadre...@aol.com>
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > snip
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was
>>> ready to be
>>> > > > > > > > Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the
>>> shoes of
>>> > > > > > > > Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan.
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Adding Ronald <spit> Regan to that list is like adding Ted
>>> Bundy to a
>>> > > > > > > list of great romantic leading men.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > And as far as Lincoln, as also pointed ot last week at the
>>> convention,
>>> > > > > > Lincoln had LESS experience than Obama when he took office:
>>> > > > > >
>>> to 2001.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > But if W. had been elected in 1860, today we'd all be whistling
>>> > > > Dixie.
>>> > >
>>> > > the Abolitionist North-East, it's not a certainty.
>>> >
>>> > He's find a way to squander that too. He'd outsource our industry to
>>> > some other country.
>>>
>>
>> Today. I was imaginining waht would happen if W were president in
>> Lincoln's time.
>
> We'd probably belong to England again.
> At the time of the Civil War, England really
> was hoping for the US to split up, so they
> could take over again. They were very
> sneakily helping the South to further these
> hopes.Then again, the one thing that could
> have brought the country back together again
> back then could have been another British
> invasion. Problem is, though, knowing W, he'd
> most likely have been working with the Brits,
> just as the current version and his family have
> been working with the Saudis for decades.
I very much doubt whether we'd have invaded. We were pretty well occupied
with cobbling together our empire, and forces were stretched as it was. In
addition, policy within the empire was moving towards devolution of our
"white" colonies such as Australia and Canada, so why would we have wanted
to take on a full-blown war for a country that wasn't really terribly
important to us either in politics or economically? Now, half a century
earlier, the story might have well been different: we were well capable of
conducting a campaign in the Americas (as demonstrated by our marching down
and burning Washington DC), and the US was still young, small and weak
enough that a conquest might have been worth a gamble.
fla...@verizon.net
On 3-Sep-2008, "Michelle Malkin" <hypa...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > Today. I was imaginining waht would happen if W were president in
> > Lincoln's time.
>
> We'd probably belong to England again.
So what we really need is a time machine!
:-)
Susan
NefeshYehudi
>
> - Show quoted text -
What we really need is for you to stop acting like an ignoramus.
John Baker
wrote:
But if you shot Dubya in the head, you wouldn't be anywhere close to a
vital organ.
>
>-Al-
John Baker
What about the ones like you who aren't acting?
NefeshYehudi
>
> - Show quoted text -
You are a skunk that hates Jews. Drop dead.
fla...@verizon.net
He's not ignorant, he's ill.
His episode is just lasting longer than usual.
Susan
NefeshYehudi
I saw that picture of you in your orange outfit holding the pot you
urinate in. You need to have your head examined. Stop hating Jews.
You are anti-semetic Susan.
•R. L. Measures
• His skull is so thick, the pistol ball would probably have bounced off.
Al Smith
>>>>> >>> > Lincoln's time.
>>> >>
>>> >> • Scary
>> >
>> >
>> >You mean the part about him getting shot in the head? Somehow that
>> >doesn't bother me.
>
> But if you shot Dubya in the head, you wouldn't be anywhere close to a
> vital organ.
>
Sad, but true. His primary brain is located somewhere near the base
of his spine.
-Al-
Al Smith
>>>>> > >> > Lincoln's time.
>>> > >
>>> > > • Scary
>> >
>> >
>> > You mean the part about him getting shot in the head? Somehow that
>> > doesn't bother me.
>> >
> • His skull is so thick, the pistol ball would probably have bounced off.
Satan would transform it into a feather before it touched him. He
and Bush have some sort of pact, I hear.
-Al-
johac
And if Cheney were president back then too and Britain attacked, he
would probably tell W to invade Mexico.
--
John #1782
johac
He's be scary in any century.
--
John #1782
johac
wrote:
> >>>> Today. I was imaginining waht would happen if W were president in
Do you mean that Cheney would be VP in that timeline too?
Come to think of it, if Cheney were there, Booth probably would have
shot himself in the head.
>
> -Al-
--
John #1782
B.H. Cramer
<fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message news:SJCvk.507$393.258@trnddc05...
>
> On 3-Sep-2008, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 12:37:01 -0700 (PDT), NefeshYehudi
>> <tac...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >What we really need is for you to stop acting like an ignoramus.
>>
>> What about the ones like you who aren't acting?
>
> He's not ignorant, he's ill.
He's speaking rationally and honestly for the first time in his life, cohen.
B.H. Cramer
"Al Smith" <inv...@address.com> wrote in message
news:juHvk.126$1x6.32@edtnps82...
I wouldn't waste the bullet. Just as I wouldn't ever unplug Sharon.
Let the pricks suffer.
•R. L. Measures
• As I understand it, Satan does not engage in agreements with coke brainers.
Al Smith
Satan does have a superabundance of damned souls to choose from
these days, it is true, but Bush is a special case. By keeping him
alive, Satan can do more harm to humanity than if he sent forth an
army of demons to ravage the earth. Bush more than earns his protection.
-Al-
NefeshYehudi
>
> - Show quoted text -
You are full of coward shit.
Al Smith
Bush is a moron who was placed in charge of the most powerful
military machine on the face of the earth. It was like giving an
AK-47 to a chimpanzee. You just knew nothing good was going to come
of it. Bush managed to cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands of
human beings, most of them innocent civilians, for absolutely no
good reason. His invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq
are pointless and unnecessary. They accomplished nothing of value,
either for the United States or for any other nation on this planet.
Bush is a war criminal, who should be arrested, tried and executed
for crimes against humanity.
-Al-
H.E. Eickleberry, Jr.
[snip]
> Bush is a moron who was placed in charge of the most powerful military
> machine on the face of the earth. It was like giving an AK-47 to a
> chimpanzee. You just knew nothing good was going to come of it. Bush
> managed to cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands of human beings, most
> of them innocent civilians, for absolutely no good reason. His invasions
> and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq are pointless and unnecessary.
> They accomplished nothing of value, either for the United States or for
> any other nation on this planet. Bush is a war criminal, who should be
> arrested, tried and executed for crimes against humanity.
If the saying "ignorance is bliss" is true, you must live in a constant
state of clueless ecstasy.
Ike
•R. L. Measures
• Guffaw.
Al Smith
A vote for the Republicans is a vote for fascism. Turn the nation
around -- vote Democrat. You may get another crop of evil bastards,
but at least they won't be the same evil bastards who have been
raping you for the past eight years.
-Al-