Re: Did the Octopus Evolve by adaption, or not? Isn't adaptive evolution a superior design to static reproduction? Who's the Dummy, Evolution Or Bukakke? B^D

[fasgnadh]

raven1 wrote:
>>Budikka wrote:
..

> Reality is indifferent to our desires.

I would suggest you get another girlfriend, but that's obviously
not possible in your case! B^D

> If there was any kind of evidence to suggest that some kind
> of "God" existed, there wouldn't be any atheists.

So by your 'logic'(sic) If there was some EVIDENCE that atheists were
right, there wouldn't be any theists.

But theists came first! B^D

Thesis before antithesis..

>> Beautiful video of a giant octopus of the genus Enteroctopus:
>> http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/07/snogged_by_an_octopus.php
...
>> Clearly there's no design involved here at all. It's all evolution:
>> undirected and unplanned, naturally.

>Got Evidence?

Nah, Bukakke thinks her mere ASSERTION is science! B^D

--

"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest

"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest

"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest

http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg

[fasgnadh]

Father Haskell wrote:
> On Jul 18, 12:26 am, Uncle Vic <addr...@withheld.com> wrote:
>> One fine day in alt.atheism, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Interesting that octopuses / octopi have three hearts.
>>> Considering how many people heart disease takes
>>> out no matter how careful they are, why wouldn't
>>> a creator god (assuming there is one) create
>>> people with more than one heart?
>>
>> Because the soul would get lost.
>
> That's as good as their answer.

[zencycle]

On Jul 19, 7:45 am, fagsnads <fasgn...@yahoo.com.au> babbled:

" Do atheists really brelieve Evolutionary adaption is a faulty design
for a dynamic environment"

Still haven't figured out a spellchecker....eh faggsie? Oh well, even
if you did it would have no effect on your lame rationalizations.

The answer is no, stupid. Evolution is what it is, neither faulty or
perfect. Evolution isn't a design, it's a process, and the process
isn't deterministic. Adaptations don't occur as a result of
environmental changes, it's only variations and mutations that
previously exist and allow for survival in a changing environment that
survive. Of course, I don't expect you to understand this, it takes
having an open mind to read and understand rather than read and accept
as fact that which has no bearing on reality, like you do with your
silly koran.

Besides that, the exchange between father haskell and vic is what is
known as 'sarcasm'. The fact that you can't see that is only more
evidence of your buffoonery.

I know, faggsie, I know....."BUT WHAT ABOUT ALL THE MURDEROUS ATHEIST
REGIMES........"

Get an new tagline, will ya?

[Christopher A. Lee]

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:35:10 -0700 (PDT), zencycle
<zenc...@bikerider.com> wrote:

>On Jul 19, 7:45�am, fagsnads <fasgn...@yahoo.com.au> babbled:
>
>" Do atheists really brelieve Evolutionary adaption is a faulty design
>for a dynamic environment"

Evolution is a scientific fact accepted by non-fundamentalist
Christians even in the educationally backward USA.

Anybody who imagines it is anything to do with atheism or vice versa
is a gibbering idiot.

Anybody who invents some caricature that he derides atheists for
"believing" is both dishonest and nasty.

Unfortunately these two sentences describe far too many religious
fanatics including a huge segment of the American population.
Australians and Europeans are ashamed of them, but for some reason
Americans aren't.

[zencycle]

On Jul 20, 9:55 am, Christopher A. Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:35:10 -0700 (PDT), zencycle
>

> Anybody who imagines it is anything to do with atheism or vice versa
> is a gibbering idiot.
>
> Anybody who invents some caricature that he derides atheists for
> "believing" is both dishonest and nasty.

Faggsie is one of those hopelessly misinformed tools that think there
is some 'atheist dogma' and tenets of belief.

He doesn't get it that atheism doesn't tell anyone to do anything,
unlike the books about his silly god.

[zencycle]

On Jul 20, 6:40 pm, Melissa <melissa.54...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
> > Faggsie is one of those hopelessly misinformed tools that think there
> > is some 'atheist dogma' and tenets of belief.
>

> His dick is bigger than yours.

>
> > He doesn't get it
>

> He gets it from me.

my my, looks whose dancing now.

I pulled your strings:
you visited my blog
you found out my personal information
you posted a total of at least 4 sock puppets, three of which are
based on my personal information

dance, little redneck neocon, dance

some legend, a pathetic coward who thinks he ca tweak me

sorry bobandc...@gmail.com