I wonder whether the reader ever considered why people established, amongst others, the so-called "copyright" laws? As it turns out, a main reason why copyright laws were introduced, and also why people practice industrial secrecy, professional confidentiality, secret ingredients, protected recipes, patents, reserved patterns, and hundreds of other ways of making copying difficult, is because the "natural principles on which the universe operates causes that learning, copying, and utilising of accomplishments of others is much easier than inventing something new or creating something own". This in turn, in combination with the inherited laziness of humans, causes that if only there is any chance to copy or to use something that belongs to others, instead of laboriously invent, create, or build our own, then everyone immediately copies it. Thus, if people do NOT obstruct mutually each others copying, through, amongst others, establishing these copyright laws, patents, secrets, etc., then all humans would only copied and used properties of others, while no-one would try to laboriously create something own.
The biggest creator that exists in the entire universe, is God (see the web page "god_proof.htm"). After all, it was God who invented first everything that we know of, and it was God who created everything that we can see (for details see the web page "evolution.htm"). Unfortunately, for many vital reasons God cannot impose "copyright laws" onto products of his creation. On the other hand, the natural laws and principles of the operation of universe cause, that for people it is much easier to learn, copy, and use of whatever God created, than for God is to invent it, or is to create something completely new and next. Thus, if God allow people to easily learn, use, and copy of whatever God laboriously created, then people would fast learned and used everything that God created. In turn God would cease to have the knowledge advantage over people. Also, soon there would be nothing new to learn in the entire universe. Therefore, in order to slightly slow-down the process of learning by people, God introduced this not very pleasant for people "canon" (i.e. principle) to his behaviour, namely that "the process of learning and creation must be hold back for people in all possible ways".
The iron application by God of this canon, that "the process of learning and creation must be obstructed to people in all possible ways", for us, people, introduces a whole array of consequences. For example, to the human science this canon has such a consequence, that "amongst all existing paths to learn a new knowledge, human science always is directed at the path which leads through the largest possible number of errors and confusion, and which requires the contribution of possibly the highest human effort". In other words, the official human science discovers the truth only after all possible untruths that could deceit people are already exhausted. Furthermore, the human science uses such principles of action, and adopts such traditions, that discovering the truth requires the highest possible effort that can be squeezed from people by God. In turn for individual creators, the iron application of this canon cases that in order a human creator developed something, he or she must firstly break through all possible obstacles which God is able to erect on his or her path.
At this point it is worth to emphasize, that the actual work of this canon can be confirmed relatively easy. This stems from the fact, that the history of science, and also the fate of subsequent discoveries and inventions, would be drastically different in the universe which is NOT created nor ruled by God, and thus in which such a canon would NOT work, when compared to the same history and fate which actually is taking place in the universe in which God introduced this canon. For example, in the universe without God and thus without this canon, the discoveries and inventions would have exclusively "random" character, while the labour of their accomplishing nor fate of their creators would NOT display any clear trend that is characterised by suffering, difficulties, obstacles, errors, confusion, etc. - which are so typical for all known earthly inventions and discoveries. On the other hand, the actual existence and action of the "canon of necessity to obstruct the process of learning and creation", becomes clearly visible and sure from the history of science and from situation of official science, as well as from fate of individual inventions and discoveries. If we look thoroughly into the history of science, then it turns out, that practically in every area always committed is the maximal possible number of errors and confusions. Continually also the science is forced to change of whatever was determined earlier and claimed officially. In turn the fate of discoveries and inventions shows a repetitive trend, that always these are hold back, while their creators always are spectacularly punished.
Of course, God is sufficiently wise and experienced to know that people are NOT mature enough to understand and to appreciate some canons which He applies to his interactions with humans. Therefore the canon discussed here God implements in such a manner, that for many people everything looks as if the difficulties and obstacles are introduced by forces other than God Himself. Thus God for example in past "simulated" the existence of special "professional obstructers" - who in old days were called "devils". At present God "simulates" other obstructers, which we popularly call "UFOnauts". In turn to balance somehow this highly detrimental for people situation which such God's "simulation" introduces, for some most stubborn researchers, for example to the author of this deduction, God sometimes grants the privilege of getting to the truth. Only that later He creates a situation on the Earth, that this truth is rejected or ignored by almost all other people.
An example which perfectly illustrates for us this path of the official science to learning through committing the maximal number of errors and confusing statements, is the topic of "time travel". On one hand we have empirical proofs, photographic evidence, and detailed explanations how to travel in time. These take the form of sightings and photographs of UFO vehicles which travel through time already now, and also descriptions of principles of time travel provided to us by the officially ignored and rejected scientific "theory of everything" called the "Concept of Dipolar Gravity" (see the web page "dipolar_gravity_pl.htm"). Examples of these UFO photographs, as well as realistic descriptions of principles of time travel together with evidence which confirms their authenticity, are provided on the totaliztic web page named "immortality.htm". In turn logical and philosophical arguments which document why the time travel is possible and even accomplishable relatively easy, are presented in items #J3 to #J6 of the totaliztic web page "wszewilki_jutra_uk.htm", and complemented with additional evidence and explanations in items #C4 and #E8 of the totaliztic web page "soul_proof.htm". On the other hand, we have this "official scientific stand" in the matter of time travel. It is so full of all possible errors, paradoxes, mutual contradictions, naive claims, and unrealistic expectations, as only can be fitted into such a narrow subject area. For example, some physicists postulate to use cosmic so-called "black holes" as "time vehicles". But they do NOT explain how after getting into their "black holes" they later will be able to come out from these. Others postulate that for time travel people create kinds of tunnels made of time-space, called "wormhole". But so-far they are unable to explain how such tunnels should be practically created, nor from where people should gain these huge amounts of energy which such creation would surely require. Still others take on the faith ideas of time travel that originate from completely fantastic creations of "science fiction" writers - for example the idea of "hyperspace" used, amongst others, in the fantastic serial "Star Trek". These hyperspaces are supposedly areas in the universe where neither time nor space do exist. Thus from them it should be possible to get into any time and any point of space. These believers with straight faces discuss the uses of such hyperspaces, in spite that there are NO scientific premises suggesting that such areas exists in the universe at all, and in spite that it is impossible to explain how after entering such a hyperspace from the very definition of these areas people would NOT cease to exist as well. What puzzles me most, is that all these efforts of scratching ones left ears with right toes are being undertaken when we have around so much evidence indicated above and easily verifiable, which confirms the easiness of software principle of time travel.
The above deductions lead to many interesting conclusions. Although these conclusions are quite obvious, and although in the real life their confirmations are encountered on every our step, typically people have a significant difficulty to realise them and to accept them. For example, in my own case it took me over 60 years to arrive to these conclusions. One amongst these conclusions states that "whatever an official institution states on any subject, including such institutions as official human science or health organisations, almost for sure this misses the truth". Therefore, with the elapse of time such an institution, e.g. the official human science or medicine, will be forced to quietly and secretly withdraw this statement or to replace it with a different one - probably also misleading. Therefore, if someone wishes to learn the more correct truth about a given subject, then should seek it amongst findings and experiences of these individual investigators which voices the official
...
> The biggest creator that exists in the entire universe, is > God (see > the web page "god_proof.htm"). After all, it was God who > invented > first everything that we know of, and it was God who > created > everything that we can see (for details see the web page > "evolution.htm").
Actually no. The Hindu Gods staked claim for this many thousands years before the Bible God did. The Hindu religion was the first religion of Earth and pre-dates even writing. The Bible God may "say" he did various things, but no, the Hindu Gods had already done this. Read your history and get educated before spouting nonsense.
On Jul 25, 5:14 pm, "The BORG" <b...@gone.com> wrote: ...
> Actually no. The Hindu Gods staked claim for this many > thousands years before the Bible God did. > The Hindu religion was the first religion of Earth and > pre-dates even writing. > The Bible God may "say" he did various things, but no, the > Hindu Gods had already done this. > Read your history and get educated before spouting nonsense.
You actually are trying to tell us that "there is more then one God in the universe". However, the Christian religion as well as Hindu religion, both clearly state that there is only one God - the same for all religions. And it is this single only God, which created everything, including you, and including all religions. So we should NOT seek, like yourself, excuses to divide ourselves e.g. into different religions, but seek what is common to all of us. And the single only God is one such common thing which should unite all humans!
> On Jul 25, 5:14 pm, "The BORG" <b...@gone.com> wrote: ... >> Actually no. The Hindu Gods staked claim for this many thousands years >> before the Bible God did. The Hindu religion was the first religion of >> Earth and pre-dates even writing. >> The Bible God may "say" he did various things, but no, the Hindu Gods >> had already done this. >> Read your history and get educated before spouting nonsense.
> You actually are trying to tell us that "there is more then one God in > the universe". However, the Christian religion as well as Hindu > religion, both clearly state that there is only one God - the same for > all religions. And it is this single only God, which created everything, > including you, and including all religions. So we should NOT seek, like > yourself, excuses to divide ourselves e.g. into different religions, but > seek what is common to all of us. And the single only God is one such > common thing which should unite all humans!
> With the totaliztic salute, > Jan Pajak
http://www.totalizm.pl/god_proof.htm (part #13.1) Still sitting in Disney's "Tree of Life" in Epcot Center when you wrote that, you crazy little coot?
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 05:19:38 -0500, polymer wrote: > Yes, dear friends, you set it free!
Varily, varily I say unto me, thou makest by mine own hand that that thou knowest to be or not, depending upon that day being upon a second Tuesday in which tiny fish doest serve themselves up to sticks with bitter sauces and roots boiled in hellish oil no more or less than thrice one hundred, and seven times that of ten, with even five more added also unto this.
On Jul 25, 5:14 pm, "The BORG" <b...@gone.com> wrote:
> Actually no. The Hindu Gods staked claim for this many > thousands years before the Bible God did. > The Hindu religion was the first religion of Earth and > pre-dates even writing. > The Bible God may "say" he did various things, but no, the > Hindu Gods had already done this. > Read your history and get educated before spouting nonsense.
It is very interesting that many people who "know practically nothing" of Hindu religion are first to teach others what "Hindu Gods" did and are. It is at least unfortunate, as if these people actually study the Hindu religion, they would realise that practically there is only the age and precision difference between Hindu and Christianity, while the content of both of these religions remains the same. As it turns out, the Hindu religion was created by God as the first religion on the Earth - quite soon after God created the physical world. Thus, God had NO much experience as to how He should teach people about Himself and about the universe. Thus God make two basic mistakes during formation of the Hindu religion, namely, (1) His holy scriptures he gave to Hindu believers were too voluminous, and therefore impossible to be digested by ordinary people, and (2) His selection of terminology and the language which God used in His holy scriptures were too precise and too abstract, thus rather difficult to understand by ordinary people. Therefore, when around 4000 years later God created the Christian religion, He eliminated these two basic errors. In this way the Bible is relatively short and can be read by practically every person, while the language of the Bible is simple - thus even ancient shepherds could understand it. But the drawbacks of the Bible include, amongst others, that it does NOT present the whole picture of God and the universe - while holy scriptures of Hinduism do, and that the simple language of the Bible is also a very ambiguous language - this many statements from the Bible can be, and are, misinterpreted by people.
In order to give here an example as to what the Hindu religion explains well, while the Bible missed almost completely in its explanations, it is the matter of "multiple personality and the parallel processing of reality by God". Means, the fact that God is like a "supercomputer with multiple processors" (while people are like small PCs with just a single microprocessor). Therefore God can do millions of things at the same time, while people can do just a single thing at a time. (The Hindu religion addressed this matter quite well.)
For those readers who did NOT study Hindu religion, let us indicate here some examples of identity between the Hindu religion and Christianity:
1. Both religions teach us that there is just a single God. In the Hindu religion this single God is called "Brahman".
2. Indicating that this single God is composed from three basic components (i.e. from "Holy Trinity"), similarly like present computers are composed of (1) "hardware", (2) "software", and (3) "peripherals". In Christianity these three components are called: (1) "God Father" or "the Ancient of Days" - which is a kind of "liquid computer hardware" or "thinking substance" and thus corresponds to the "hardware" from present computers (or to the "brain" from human body); (2) "Holy Ghost" which is a kind of "natural program" which evolved in this "liquid computer hardware", and thus which is an equivalent to "software" from present human computers (or to the "knowledge" contained in the human brain); and (3) "God Son" which represents everything that was formed from this "liquid computer" by appropriate natural programs - thus which is an equivalent of "peripherals" from present human computers (or "hands" from the human body). In turn the Hindu religion this "Holy Trinity" is described rather by their function, not by their composition. Therefore the Hindu equivalent to (1) hardware "God Father", is called "Brahma - creator"; the Hindu equivalent to (2) software "Holy Ghost", is called "Vishnu - preserver"; while the Hindu equivalent of (3) peripheral "God Son", is called "Siva - destroyer".
3. The name God uses. In the Bible God names Himself with the word "Jehovah" written in the Jewish alphabet. In Hindu scriptures God names Himself with the word "Brahman" written in the "Sanskrit" alphabet. When both these names are translated into English via different paths and translation systems, we receive two names, i.e. "Jehovah" and "Brahman". But if we listen to these two names pronounced in the original language from which they originate, it turns out that the sounds describing God in both these religions and languages are the same!
4. The omnipresence of God and His ability to do millions things at once. The Christianity does NOT explain how this is possible. The philosophy named "totalizm" explains it by the use of the similarity of God to a "multiprocessor supercomputer". In turn the Hindu religion explains it extremely well with the use of the idea of "Deities" - which can be compared to individual processors in a multiprocessor supercomputer.
These readers who wish to glen further information which extend the above brief summary, are welcomed to see items #B5 and #B6 from the totaliztic web page named "god.htm", item #C1 from the totaliztic web page "soul_proof.htm", and item #B1 and #B5 from the web page "evolution.htm". Both these web pages can be viewed at following addresses (i.e. from following web sites): http://energia.sl.pl/evolution.htm http://members.fortunecity.com/timevehicle/evolution.htm
