Ann Coulter fears anus, foreskin bombings
John Manning
Ann Coulter says she�s afraid of anal, foreskin bombings
If you didn't lose your lunch over comments conservative doyenne Ann
Coulter made about abortion doctors ("I'm not opposed to shooting
abortionists") or about Jews ("We just want Jews to be perfected, as
they say") or maybe even about John Edwards (whom she called a
"faggot"), you might just lose it over her latest quip.
Ann Coulter is against body scans because she doesn't think they'll find
anal bombs.
Speaking on Fox News' O'Reilly Factor Tuesday night, Coulter declared
she was opposed to the Transportation Security Administration's new push
to add body scanners to airports in an effort to detect terrorist's
explosive devices.
O�Reilly countered: �If you have a body scan and you have a bomb in your
underwear, they can see the bomb through the body scan.�
To this, Coulter replied: "No one credible has asserted that... No
they'll be able to see a container... It was spread throughout the
diaper. Unless the bomb is inserted under the foreskin, and by the way,
I don�t see a clear angle on the anus. That�s a pretty easy hiding place
for this."
"Moreover, the shoe bomber, all of his bomb materials was, I think, 50
milligrams," Coulter added. "The diaper bomber carried 80 milligrams. As
long as there's carry-on luggage, they're going to get it on."
O'Reilly noted that Coulter is in rare agreement with the American Civil
Liberties Union, the civil rights group, which argues that the full body
scans intrude on Americans' privacy.
"Even a broken clock twice a day," Coulter quipped.
"Let's just say this is all a joke to make Americans feel safe when they
are no safer and just us let board airplanes," Coulter said earlier in
the interview. "I promise you if they start doing all this you're naked
body will show up on [the New York Post's] Page Six" gossip column.
http://rawstory.com/2010/01/ann-coulter-afraid-anus-foreskin-bombings/
Duwaynea Anderson
> Ann Coulter says she’s afraid of anal, foreskin bombings
>
> If you didn't lose your lunch over comments conservative doyenne Ann
> Coulter made about abortion doctors ("I'm not opposed to shooting
> abortionists") or about Jews ("We just want Jews to be perfected, as
> they say") or maybe even about John Edwards (whom she called a
> "faggot"), you might just lose it over her latest quip.
>
> Ann Coulter is against body scans because she doesn't think they'll find
> anal bombs.
>
> Speaking on Fox News' O'Reilly Factor Tuesday night, Coulter declared
> she was opposed to the Transportation Security Administration's new push
> to add body scanners to airports in an effort to detect terrorist's
> explosive devices.
>
> underwear, they can see the bomb through the body scan.”
>
> To this, Coulter replied: "No one credible has asserted that... No
> they'll be able to see a container... It was spread throughout the
> diaper. Unless the bomb is inserted under the foreskin, and by the way,
> for this."
>
> "Moreover, the shoe bomber, all of his bomb materials was, I think, 50
> milligrams," Coulter added. "The diaper bomber carried 80 milligrams. As
> long as there's carry-on luggage, they're going to get it on."
>
> O'Reilly noted that Coulter is in rare agreement with the American Civil
> Liberties Union, the civil rights group, which argues that the full body
> scans intrude on Americans' privacy.
>
> "Even a broken clock twice a day," Coulter quipped.
>
> "Let's just say this is all a joke to make Americans feel safe when they
> are no safer and just us let board airplanes," Coulter said earlier in
> the interview. "I promise you if they start doing all this you're naked
> body will show up on [the New York Post's] Page Six" gossip column.
>
> http://rawstory.com/2010/01/ann-coulter-afraid-anus-foreskin-bombings/
The risk of airline passengers dying from a terrorist attack is
extraordinarily low.
"There were a total of 674 passengers, not counting crew or the
terrorists themselves, on the flights on which these incidents
occurred. By contrast, there have been 7,015,630,000 passenger
enplanements over the past decade. Therefore, the odds of being on
given departure which is the subject of a terrorist incident have been
1 in 10,408,947 over the past decade. By contrast, the odds of being
struck by lightning in a given year are about 1 in 500,000. This means
that you could board 20 flights per year and still be less likely to
be the subject of an attempted terrorist attack than to be struck by
lightning."
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/01/nate_silver_on.html
On the other hand, the risk from full-body scanners using x-ray
backscatter is not zero.
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/331/7508/77?ehom
Since we're dealing with such small probabilities in each case it's
entirely possible that the mandate for full-body scanners will end up
killing more people (from radiation-induced carcinomas) than those
saved from potential terrorist attacks.
So we not only give up our privacy, we probably end up at greater risk
of dying.
This whole reaction seems to be politically driven and calculated to
feed on fear and ignorance. And I suspect there is more than one
Congressman that has a hefty financial stake in the companies that
make the full-body scanners.
@aol.invalid P. Schmeckelstein
"John Manning" <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote in message
news:jrydnfXpgvAJbtjW...@giganews.com...
>
>
> Ann Coulter says she�s afraid of anal, foreskin bombings
>
>
> If you didn't lose your lunch over comments conservative doyenne Ann
> Coulter made about abortion doctors ("I'm not opposed to shooting
> abortionists") or about Jews ("We just want Jews to be perfected, as
> they say") or maybe even about John Edwards (whom she called a
> "faggot"), you might just lose it over her latest quip.
>
> Ann Coulter is against body scans because she doesn't think they'll find
> anal bombs.
>
> Speaking on Fox News' O'Reilly Factor Tuesday night, Coulter declared
> she was opposed to the Transportation Security Administration's new push
> to add body scanners to airports in an effort to detect terrorist's
> explosive devices.
>
> underwear, they can see the bomb through the body scan.�
>
> To this, Coulter replied: "No one credible has asserted that... No
> they'll be able to see a container... It was spread throughout the
> diaper. Unless the bomb is inserted under the foreskin, and by the way,
> for this."
>
> "Moreover, the shoe bomber, all of his bomb materials was, I think, 50
> milligrams," Coulter added. "The diaper bomber carried 80 milligrams. As
> long as there's carry-on luggage, they're going to get it on."
>
> O'Reilly noted that Coulter is in rare agreement with the American Civil
> Liberties Union, the civil rights group, which argues that the full body
> scans intrude on Americans' privacy.
>
> "Even a broken clock twice a day," Coulter quipped.
>
> "Let's just say this is all a joke to make Americans feel safe when they
> are no safer and just us let board airplanes," Coulter said earlier in
> the interview. "I promise you if they start doing all this you're naked
> body will show up on [the New York Post's] Page Six" gossip column.
>
> http://rawstory.com/2010/01/ann-coulter-afraid-anus-foreskin-bombings/
>
>
>
>
Oy vey! Actually she is right. Oy! The people at security look at suspect
objects based on the containers they're in, bottles, flasks, computers, like
that even, or the object's shape like a knife or a gun. Enough already!
A foreskin bomb is a good reason to insist all male passenger be
circumcised, still yet even. Such a thing! And a diaper bomb would have no
definite shape either. Oy vey! (So, no babies, or babies with diapers?) Or
what about a testicle bomb, only eunuchs can fly? Or a pregnant mother's
uterus bomb. ... A deep cavity search for every woman! Impossible! Oy vey!
What a mishmosh this is getting to be.
Rabbi Pinky Schmeckelstein
USENET IS UNCENSORED
http://www.evolvefish.com/fish/media/E-Gefilte.gif
http://www.evolvefish.com/fish/media/E-FoodFish.gif
@aol.invalid P. Schmeckelstein
"Duwaynea Anderson" <duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:314ef5e3-7172-4a3c...@35g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/01/nate_silver_on.html
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/331/7508/77?ehom
-------------------------------
Once the number of frequent fliers dying from cancer is noticed, they'll
have to see the real numbers and the real risks for flyers. Oy vey, such a
thing, already. The whole megillah is making me crazy, already! Oy gevalt!
It's like crying fire in a crowed theater house, when it's really a fire in
the town 200 miles away. Oy! Such a thing, already! Enough, please! It's
making me sick.
Duwaynea Anderson
wrote:
> "John Manning" <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote in message
>
> Rabbi Pinky Schmeckelstein
> USENET IS UNCENSORED
>
> http://www.evolvefish.com/fish/media/E-Gefilte.gifhttp://www.evolvefish.com/fish/media/E-FoodFish.gif
Here's an idea -- a "boob" job that is actually a "bomb" job. Instead
of filing the breast with silicone, fill it with an explosive.
Terrorists wouldn't necessarily have to use women, either. They could
use fat men with man boobies. In any event, big boobs and big man
boobies could hold a lot of C4. I guess it's just a matter of time
before women will be having the TSA fondle their breast.
Either that, or all the big women and men with man boobies will just
have to take the train.
John Manning
>>
>> If you didn't lose your lunch over comments conservative doyenne Ann
>> Coulter made about abortion doctors ("I'm not opposed to shooting
>> abortionists") or about Jews ("We just want Jews to be perfected, as
>> they say") or maybe even about John Edwards (whom she called a
>> "faggot"), you might just lose it over her latest quip.
>>
>> Ann Coulter is against body scans because she doesn't think they'll find
>> anal bombs.
>>
>> Speaking on Fox News' O'Reilly Factor Tuesday night, Coulter declared
>> she was opposed to the Transportation Security Administration's new push
>> to add body scanners to airports in an effort to detect terrorist's
>> explosive devices.
>>
>> underwear, they can see the bomb through the body scan.�
>>
>> To this, Coulter replied: "No one credible has asserted that... No
>> they'll be able to see a container... It was spread throughout the
>> diaper. Unless the bomb is inserted under the foreskin, and by the way,
Exactly right, Duwayne:
Former Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff Profits from Full Body
Scanners
WASHINGTON - Since the attempted bombing of a US airliner on Christmas
Day, former Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff has given
dozens of media interviews touting the need for the federal government
to buy more full-body scanners for airports.
What he has made little mention of is that the Chertoff Group, his
security consulting agency, includes a client that manufactures the
machines.
Dan Listermann
"John Manning" <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote in message
news:jrydnfXpgvAJbtjW...@giganews.com...
>
>
>
> "Let's just say this is all a joke to make Americans feel safe when they
> are no safer and just us let board airplanes," Coulter said earlier in
> the interview. "I promise you if they start doing all this you're naked
> body will show up on [the New York Post's] Page Six" gossip column.
>
> http://rawstory.com/2010/01/ann-coulter-afraid-anus-foreskin-bombings/
>
Considering her Adam's apple, what is in "her" pants could be enlightening.
. ..
@aol.invalid P. Schmeckelstein
-----------------------
So if the titties in question are squeezed and they hold their newly
squeezed shape, uhhh oh! And oy vey! It's a bomb scare at the airport
security post. The whole airport gets shut down for 6 1/2 hours. Just to
think of it, already! And every airport security check point would need a
bomb proof holding pen for human bombs. Oy vey, such a thing, already! It's
a real mashuganah. Oy gevalt!
Nomen Publicus
>
>
> Ann Coulter says she?s afraid of anal, foreskin bombings
>
>
> If you didn't lose your lunch over comments conservative doyenne Ann
> Coulter made about abortion doctors ("I'm not opposed to shooting
> abortionists") or about Jews ("We just want Jews to be perfected, as
> they say") or maybe even about John Edwards (whom she called a
> "faggot"), you might just lose it over her latest quip.
>
> Ann Coulter is against body scans because she doesn't think they'll find
> anal bombs.
>
> Speaking on Fox News' O'Reilly Factor Tuesday night, Coulter declared
> she was opposed to the Transportation Security Administration's new push
> to add body scanners to airports in an effort to detect terrorist's
> explosive devices.
>
> underwear, they can see the bomb through the body scan.?
>
> To this, Coulter replied: "No one credible has asserted that... No
> they'll be able to see a container... It was spread throughout the
> diaper. Unless the bomb is inserted under the foreskin, and by the way,
> for this."
>
> "Moreover, the shoe bomber, all of his bomb materials was, I think, 50
> milligrams," Coulter added. "The diaper bomber carried 80 milligrams. As
> long as there's carry-on luggage, they're going to get it on."
"milligrams"? That's about as scary as a xmas cracker. It was 80 grams.
>
> O'Reilly noted that Coulter is in rare agreement with the American Civil
> Liberties Union, the civil rights group, which argues that the full body
> scans intrude on Americans' privacy.
>
> "Even a broken clock twice a day," Coulter quipped.
>
> "Let's just say this is all a joke to make Americans feel safe when they
> are no safer and just us let board airplanes," Coulter said earlier in
> the interview. "I promise you if they start doing all this you're naked
> body will show up on [the New York Post's] Page Six" gossip column.
>
> http://rawstory.com/2010/01/ann-coulter-afraid-anus-foreskin-bombings/
She is a silly person, but you can be sure that any "celebs" that go through
the new scanners will find their images on internet pretty quickly.
--
Animals do not have gods, they are smarter than that. -- Ronnie Snow
WangoTango
zza...@buffy.sighup.org.uk says...
>
> She is a silly person, but you can be sure that any "celebs" that go through
> the new scanners will find their images on internet pretty quickly.
Look at her Adam's Apple and those hands, once they get a full body scan
of 'her' the cat will finally be out of the bag, or her pants.......
Richo
> John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
> > Ann Coulter says she?s afraid of anal, foreskin bombings
>
> > If you didn't lose your lunch over comments conservative doyenne Ann
> > Coulter made about abortion doctors ("I'm not opposed to shooting
> > abortionists") or about Jews ("We just want Jews to be perfected, as
> > they say") or maybe even about John Edwards (whom she called a
> > "faggot"), you might just lose it over her latest quip.
>
> > Ann Coulter is against body scans because she doesn't think they'll find
> > anal bombs.
>
> > Speaking on Fox News' O'Reilly Factor Tuesday night, Coulter declared
> > she was opposed to the Transportation Security Administration's new push
> > to add body scanners to airports in an effort to detect terrorist's
> > explosive devices.
>
> > O?Reilly countered: ?If you have a body scan and you have a bomb in your
> > underwear, they can see the bomb through the body scan.?
>
> > To this, Coulter replied: "No one credible has asserted that... No
> > they'll be able to see a container... It was spread throughout the
> > diaper. Unless the bomb is inserted under the foreskin, and by the way,
> > I don?t see a clear angle on the anus. That?s a pretty easy hiding place
> > for this."
>
> > "Moreover, the shoe bomber, all of his bomb materials was, I think, 50
> > milligrams," Coulter added. "The diaper bomber carried 80 milligrams. As
> > long as there's carry-on luggage, they're going to get it on."
>
> "milligrams"? That's about as scary as a xmas cracker. It was 80 grams.
>
She is only wrong by a factor of a thousand!
Cut her some slack!
Mark.
Father Haskell
> Ann Coulter says she’s afraid of anal, foreskin bombings
>
> If you didn't lose your lunch over comments conservative doyenne Ann
> Coulter made about abortion doctors ("I'm not opposed to shooting
> abortionists") or about Jews ("We just want Jews to be perfected, as
> they say") or maybe even about John Edwards (whom she called a
> "faggot"), you might just lose it over her latest quip.
>
> Ann Coulter is against body scans because she doesn't think they'll find
> anal bombs.
>
> Speaking on Fox News' O'Reilly Factor Tuesday night, Coulter declared
> she was opposed to the Transportation Security Administration's new push
> to add body scanners to airports in an effort to detect terrorist's
> explosive devices.
>
> underwear, they can see the bomb through the body scan.”
>
> To this, Coulter replied: "No one credible has asserted that... No
> they'll be able to see a container... It was spread throughout the
> diaper. Unless the bomb is inserted under the foreskin, and by the way,
> for this."
>
> "Moreover, the shoe bomber, all of his bomb materials was, I think, 50
> milligrams," Coulter added. "The diaper bomber carried 80 milligrams. As
> long as there's carry-on luggage, they're going to get it on."
>
> O'Reilly noted that Coulter is in rare agreement with the American Civil
> Liberties Union, the civil rights group, which argues that the full body
> scans intrude on Americans' privacy.
>
> "Even a broken clock twice a day," Coulter quipped.
>
> "Let's just say this is all a joke to make Americans feel safe when they
> are no safer and just us let board airplanes," Coulter said earlier in
> the interview. "I promise you if they start doing all this you're naked
> body will show up on [the New York Post's] Page Six" gossip column.
>
> http://rawstory.com/2010/01/ann-coulter-afraid-anus-foreskin-bombings/
Sounds like she's done exhaustive research.
Dr. Smartass, Troll Veterinarian
> Ann Coulter says she's afraid of anal, foreskin bombings
I thought for sure "she" was circumcised--but who would bomb "her" foreskin
when that adam's apple is an easier target?
--
Doc Smartass | BAAWA Knight of Troll Medication | aa # 1939
Book reviews: http://jw-bookblog.blogspot.com/
Kook Clearinghouse! http://kookclearinghouse.blogspot.com/
Pray for Goppers the way they pray for Obama! Psalm 109!
Smiler
> Ann Coulter says she�s afraid of anal, foreskin bombings
>
>
> If you didn't lose your lunch over comments conservative doyenne Ann
> Coulter made about abortion doctors ("I'm not opposed to shooting
> abortionists") or about Jews ("We just want Jews to be perfected, as
> they say") or maybe even about John Edwards (whom she called a
> "faggot"), you might just lose it over her latest quip.
>
> Ann Coulter is against body scans because she doesn't think they'll
> find anal bombs.
>
> Speaking on Fox News' O'Reilly Factor Tuesday night, Coulter declared
> she was opposed to the Transportation Security Administration's new
> push to add body scanners to airports in an effort to detect
> terrorist's explosive devices.
>
> your underwear, they can see the bomb through the body scan.�
>
> To this, Coulter replied: "No one credible has asserted that... No
> they'll be able to see a container... It was spread throughout the
> diaper. Unless the bomb is inserted under the foreskin, and by the
> hiding place for this."
Somebody should point out to the stupid cow that the most likely bombers,
muslims, don't have foreskins. They're circumcised at a young age.
Anyhow, how much explosive can be hidden in a foreskin? Enough for a loud
'pop'! That tells us a lot about her knowledge of male anatomy.
OTOH, her anus should be able to carry a large amount of explosive, seeing
that it's big enough to accommodate her head.
--
Smiler
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
All gods are bespoke. They're all made to
perfectly fit the prejudices of their believer
SkyEyes
> To this, Coulter replied: "No one credible has asserted that... No
> they'll be able to see a container... It was spread throughout the
> diaper. Unless the bomb is inserted under the foreskin, and by the way,
> I don’t see a clear angle on the anus. That’s a pretty easy hiding place
> for this."
There must be a new ethno-religious group bombing us that we don't
know about. Muslim men are circumcised and therefore have no
foreskins. So I guess we can stop worrying about young muslim men
being terrorists, then?
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net