Re: I Found A Great Tarot Card Shop
Joseph Littleshoes
> I know how hard it is to find a reliable and trust worthy source for
> supplies for the craft.
You have been misinformed.
> Around here by me there are no shops that I
> can buy my supplies from so I have been doing a lot of browsing and
> searching. After coming across a few sites, I found one that has
> just about anything you can imagine for all of us who practice.
You have been seriously misinformed.
And your disingenuousness in promoting your own site in such a dishonest
manner as if an unaffiliated testimonial demonstrates an intellectual
dishonesty that should discourage any one thinking of making a purchase
from your site.
Were it not for that i would suggest a number of sites that have a
fuller. more complete selection of more traditional "occult" supplies of
whatever type an individual might be looking for.
> If you need anything for supplies browse through their site and see
> what they have. They have over 13 pages of tarot cards, pretty cool
> site!
Starting with cheap brass candle holders and "Spells for Teens."
To say nothing of the 'spell kits' and spell casting offers in the
google advert section of your site.
Any honest supplier of occult supplies would not be offering anonymous
'spells' from non affiliated sources.
You might get some curious kids willing to spend their allowance on you
'products' but your advertising this way in these groups just makes you
look dishonest.
--
Joseph Littleshoes
.
Alexandra Ceelie
Where is this? I never saw the original post, only your response with
the link snipped.
From your account though, maybe it's for the best, but I'm the curious
sort :)
=^..^=
Xandra
Tom
"Joseph Littleshoes" <jpst...@isp.com> wrote in message
news:7dd4e$48bf7ea4$4396f73c$17...@DIALUPUSA.NET...
> MidnightsRise wrote:
>> I know how hard it is to find a reliable and trust worthy source for
>> supplies for the craft.
>
> You have been misinformed.
Well, of course he has. Having been misinformed is a very good reason to
doubt the reliability and trustworthiness of one's informers.
And now *you* pose as the informer. Is there any reason you can offer as to
why *you* should be thought more trustworthy than the rest?
> And your disingenuousness in promoting your own site in such a dishonest
> manner as if an unaffiliated testimonial demonstrates an intellectual
> dishonesty that should discourage any one thinking of making a purchase
> from your site.
All this just because he didn't tout *your* favorite site for occult
trinkets.
> Any honest supplier of occult supplies would not be offering anonymous
> 'spells' from non affiliated sources.
*Your* favorite site for occult trinkets does.
Joseph Littleshoes
Its in a lot of 'occult' groups, i was composing a response to the ones
i read and i guess it was actually not posted to alt.magick.
However, a copy can be found in any of the other X posted groups of this
message.
--
JL
.
Joseph Littleshoes
> Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
>> MidnightsRise wrote:
>>> I know how hard it is to find a reliable and trust worthy source for
>>> supplies for the craft.
>>
>>
>> You might get some curious kids willing to spend their allowance on
>> you 'products' but your advertising this way in these groups just
>> makes you look dishonest.
>> --
>> Joseph Littleshoes
>> .
>>
>
> Where is this? I never saw the original post, only your response with
> the link snipped.
> From your account though, maybe it's for the best, but I'm the curious
> sort :)
>
> =^..^=
> Xandra
>
Actually its by the same person posting in alt.magick as "MidnightRise"
and under to subject line of "Found a Great Magick Supply Store"
Even tried to sneak one by the mods on ARWM. It's the same post with
different subject lines and a feeble attempt to hide what it had already
done by changing its headers.
--
JL
.
mika
> >
> > They have over 13 pages of tarot cards
Any decent online bookstore has plenty of tarot cards available for
sale. For example:
http://www.powells.com/s?kw=tarot+cards&x=0&y=0
Or even Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=tarot+cards&x=0&y=0
Joseph Littleshoes
>
> Joseph Littleshoes wrote
>> Any honest supplier of occult supplies would not be offering anonymous
>> 'spells' from non affiliated sources.
>
>
> *Your* favorite site for occult trinkets does.
My, according to you, 'favorite site' only sells their own, and not
others whom they have no knowledge of ... you anatomical orifice.
But thanks again for demonstrating your comprehension of the written
word is even less developed than your minimal ability to read it, not
bad for an eliminatory orifice but still, not up to the standards you
would like others to believe you are capable of.
.
Tom
> "Tom" wrote:
>>
>> Joseph Littleshoes wrote
>
>>> Any honest supplier of occult supplies would not be offering anonymous
>>> 'spells' from non affiliated sources.
>>
>> *Your* favorite site for occult trinkets does.
>
> My, according to you, 'favorite site' only sells their own, and not others
> whom they have no knowledge of ... you anatomical orifice.
You didn't say "selling". You said "offering", and yes, they do offer
anonymous spells on their site. As for the authorship of the spells they
*do* sell, many of those are allegedly "traditional" spells whose authorship
is anonymous. Your huckster friends are *not* selling only spells that they
have created themselves.
> But thanks again for demonstrating your comprehension of the written word
> is even less developed than your minimal ability to read it,
I comprehend the difference between the word "offer" and the word "sell",
which you demonstrably didn't. At least you didn't until I educated you
just now. As one might expect, though, you're not a fan of being educated,
so your resentment of it is understandable.
Joseph Littleshoes
>
> Joseph Littleshoes wrote
>
>> "Tom" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Joseph Littleshoes wrote
>>
>>
>>>> Any honest supplier of occult supplies would not be offering
>>>> anonymous 'spells' from non affiliated sources.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Your* favorite site for occult trinkets does.
>>
>>
>> My, according to you, 'favorite site' only sells their own, and not
>> others whom they have no knowledge of ... you anatomical orifice.
>
>
> You didn't say "selling". You said "offering",
I said 'anonymous' a google advert on the lucky site? surly you jest?
you anatomically correct eliminatory orifice.
> and yes, they do offer
> anonymous spells on their site. As for the authorship of the spells
> they *do* sell, many of those are allegedly "traditional" spells whose
> authorship is anonymous. Your huckster friends are *not* selling only
> spells that they have created themselves.
Oy! yes they sell the 'spells' they make, or endorse from known sources
you anatomically correct eliminatory orifice.
>
>> But thanks again for demonstrating your comprehension of the written
>> word is even less developed than your minimal ability to read it,
>
>
> I comprehend the difference between the word "offer" and the word
> "sell",
And you just ignore 'unaffiliated.'
--
JL
.
Joseph Littleshoes
>
> Joseph Littleshoes wrote
>> "Tom" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Joseph Littleshoes wrote
>>
>>
>>>> Any honest supplier of occult supplies would not be offering
>>>> anonymous 'spells' from non affiliated sources.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Your* favorite site for occult trinkets does.
>
Your existence here only serves to remind me of some further 'filters'
that need to be engaged.
--
JL
.
Tom
> "Tom" wrote:
>
>>
>> Joseph Littleshoes wrote
>>> "Tom" wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Joseph Littleshoes wrote
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Any honest supplier of occult supplies would not be offering anonymous
>>>>> 'spells' from non affiliated sources.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Your* favorite site for occult trinkets does.
>>>
>>>
>>> My, according to you, 'favorite site' only sells their own, and not
>>> others whom they have no knowledge of ... you anatomical orifice.
>>
>>
>> You didn't say "selling". You said "offering",
>
> I said 'anonymous' a google advert on the lucky site?
No, you didn't say "google advert". You said "anonymous 'spells' from
non-affiliated sources". Try to keep straight the difference between what
you actually wrote and what you merely imagine that you've written.
I agree that your idols don't often advertise others' products on their
website. At least not for free...
>> and yes, they do offer anonymous spells on their site. As for the
>> authorship of the spells they *do* sell, many of those are allegedly
>> "traditional" spells whose authorship is anonymous. Your huckster
>> friends are *not* selling only spells that they have created themselves.
>
> Oy! yes they sell the 'spells' they make, or endorse from known sources
> you anatomically correct eliminatory orifice.
Traditional sources are almost entirely from anonymous authors. Ergo, they
are not "known sources", despite your dog-like faith in the omnipotence and
perfect righteousness of your masters. You do realize that even they think
you're a twit, don't you?
>> I comprehend the difference between the word "offer" and the word "sell",
>
> And you just ignore 'unaffiliated.'
"Unaffiliated source" does not mean "google advert", either. There are all
sorts of affiliations. Perhaps if you actually know what the words you were
using mean, you would be less likely to choose yours so poorly. One word
you should definitely look up is "sycophancy".
Tom
>
> As far as im concerned your a petty non - entity.
As opposed to an important non-entity?
> Your existence here only serves to remind me of some further 'filters'
> that need to be engaged.
It seems you yourself have forgotten this lesson. You've been bragging that
you'd filtered me out for some time now, but it's apparent that this wasn't
really the case. If there's one thing that's consistent about you, it's
your inablity to display mastery of the lessons you try to teach to others.
mark
The one that I actually, no, you can't. It's the seventies non-bowdlerized
Yaeger deck.
mark
mark
I'm really not into the Tarot, though I do know something, having read what
many folks I respect consider the last word on Tarot, the Case book from,
what, 1911?
Anyway, there are a number of decks I think work, other than
the "traditional" ones (and yes, we know the artist of some). Let's see,
there's the one my old friend Mary Hanson-Roberts did (and I know she
worked on those for *years* - as in, she'd been working on them for eight
years in the mid-seventies, and they weren't published until '85. I,
personally, rather like the *unbowdlerized* Yaeger deck; the friend that
showed me hers has the only one I've ever seen (bowdlerized, as in it looks
like someone's 11-yr-old used a crayon to draw boxer shorts on the
figures).
Others' preferences?
mark "also has the Fannish Tarot"
Gale
<snip>
>
> Others' preferences?
I've accumulated a collection of decks, including some that seem great
for certain types of readings, though not for general readings. For
certain types of decisions, I've been delighted with Tarot of the 78
Doors, by Pietro Alligo & Antonella Platano.
More generally, I use the standard Ryder-Waite, the Robin Woods deck, or
the Mary Hanson-Roberts deck.
--
Blessed Be,
Gale
original fiction, poetry, reviews http://www.capjewels.com
"Progress which pursues only the next invention, progress which pulls
thought out of the mind and replaces it with idle slogans, is not
progress at all. It is a beckoning mirage in a desert over which stagger
the generations of men." -- Loren Eisley, _The Firmament of Time_
Alexandra Ceelie
My favorite deck is the Aquarian Tarot... the watercolor and soft
pictures suit the Moonchild in me.
For online readings, I prefer to use the Mage Tarot, though. They just
seem to be more accurate going through the bitstream. I'm thinking it's
a Technocracy thing ;)
=^..^=
Xandra
quintal
dantPAYATT...@comcast.net says...
tom and his compulsive bullying... he's kinda possessed, when you think
of it.
--
Illuminatus
Adorateur du Principe du Mal
(d'après <g675f5$f8$1...@news.datemas.de>)
quintal
says...
try the "tarots de marseilles".
we are fortunate enough in europe to have an alchemical tradition which
immunizes us against the lowlife freemasonic occultism under which the
anglo-saxons are unfortunately... castrated.
one of my fav tarot de marseilles decks :
http://en.camoin.com
seriously, the usual english tarots listing is appalling.
> mark "also has the Fannish Tarot"
>
>
--
Steve
"quintal" <qui...@francom.esoterisme> wrote in message
news:MPG.233c27a85...@news.club-internet.fr...
> In article <hLKdnVm-zcyrF1nV...@rcn.net>, whit...@rcn.com
> says...
>> Dragging this to something actually relevant....
>>
>> I'm really not into the Tarot, though I do know something, having read
>> what
>> many folks I respect consider the last word on Tarot, the Case book from,
>> what, 1911?
>>
>> Anyway, there are a number of decks I think work, other than
>> the "traditional" ones (and yes, we know the artist of some). Let's see,
>> there's the one my old friend Mary Hanson-Roberts did (and I know she
>> worked on those for *years* - as in, she'd been working on them for eight
>> years in the mid-seventies, and they weren't published until '85. I,
>> personally, rather like the *unbowdlerized* Yaeger deck; the friend that
>> showed me hers has the only one I've ever seen (bowdlerized, as in it
>> looks
>> like someone's 11-yr-old used a crayon to draw boxer shorts on the
>> figures).
>>
>> Others' preferences?
>
> try the "tarots de marseilles".
> we are fortunate enough in europe to have an alchemical tradition which
> immunizes us against the lowlife freemasonic occultism under which the
> anglo-saxons are unfortunately... castrated.
Really?? got *PROOF*??...maybe some URL links??
Joseph Littleshoes
>
>
> tom and his compulsive bullying... he's kinda possessed, when you think
> of it.
>
fond of pseudo communication and the particularistic fallacy.
--
JL
.
Bruce
I know all about Sycophancy. Jest ask me.. ..It has to do with ONE
leader, drawing others to him. Like in Shamanism.
Sun Myung Moon is a GREAT leader, and has MANY sycophants.
While David Albans over in alt.religion.angels is jest a pion leader
and only has three maybe four sycophants. But there all the same
thing..
sycophant
One entry found.
Main Entry:
sy·co·phant
Pronunciation:
\-fənt also -ˌfant\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Latin sycophanta slanderer, swindler,
from Greek sykophantēs slanderer, from sykon fig +
phainein to show — more at fancy
Date:
1575
--->
: a servile self-seeking flatterer
synonyms see parasite
---+
— sycophant adjective
======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT:
I don't notice much in this article - nor, by now, the entire thread - that is on topic for any of the newsgroups listed. It might wise to add at least a modicum of topicality to future posts. -Baird
Joseph Littleshoes
>
> ======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT:
> I don't notice much in this article - nor, by now, the entire thread - that is on topic for any of the newsgroups listed. It might wise to add at least a modicum of topicality to future posts. -Baird
>
Im sending this from alt.tarot and just curious as to which of the x
posted groups is 'moderated'?
--
JL
.
Parse Tree
I think generally alt groups that are moderated have moderated in their
title, so you can probably assume that the moderated group is the one
non-alt group in the groups. Ie. soc.religion.paganism
Bruce
Sassers with their black hats, and their bags of tricks are
EVERYwhere.
You really can't avoid them, unless you hide in one NG, and have
enough
support in the NG to keep them out! Unfortunately they can be like
fleas on a hound, and will follow people around. Thus being a pain in
the
behind for EVERYone involved.
There IS a way around it.
Cia
Bruce
Baird Stafford
<0a2d2e6f-04a4-49f1...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Bruce <cisc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sassers with their black hats, and their bags of tricks are
> EVERYwhere. You really can't avoid them, unless you hide in one NG,
> and have enough support in the NG to keep them out! Unfortunately
> they can be like fleas on a hound, and will follow people around.
> Thus being a pain in the behind for EVERYone involved.
> There IS a way around it.
Yep. Just include *one* moderated newsgroup in the crossposts.
Articles including a moderated group are sent first to the moderators'
queue and, if killed there, never appear even in the unmoderated
newsgroups.
NNTP servers have been configured that way since moderated newsgroups
were introduced back in nineteen-eighty something.
Baird
--
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and in a divided country
that's enough to win elections. -Bill Steele
quintal
jste...@comcast.net says...
to what... the castration of anglo saxon occultism under the satanistic
crowleyan (illuminati) influence? read this newsgroup.
The tarot decks are a good demonstration of this. Look at the ones that
are for sale in european shops. Compare to what's avaliable in the USA.