Jenny, the AOL clam
Rod Keller
She's been posting about Grady to groups like alt.fashion.
--------
Subject: A very serious question- opinions sought
From: jenn...@aol.com (JennyJ686)
Date: 1997/10/26
Message-ID: <19971026031...@ladder01.news.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fashion
alt.fashion seems to be one of the few newsgroups where posts by
women are in the majority.
With this in mind I have a very serious question to pose.
Below you will find an edited version of a post that resulted in the
termination of a man's account by his internet service provider,
Tidepool.com.
The individual complained that he was censored and that the ISP
had no right to close his account. He threatened suit so his ISP
decided to let netizens register their opinions on this subject.
What do you think?
***************************************************************
EDITED VERSION OF POSTING ON NEWSGROUP
WITH PERSONAL NAMES AND IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION REMOVED:
**************************************************************
"Subject: Re: Whore!! Shit-Vagina Whore!!
>I am talking to you, you shit-vagina whore!
>She shudders with involuntary pleasure every time you
>describe her that way.... Yes, I know she complains ...
>but that's just for appearances. She is really getting wet
>down there thinking about her children looking up their
>mom on the Internet and finding "shit-vagina whore"
>accompanying it. ... Then their grandchildren. Forever. ...
>Shit-vagina 'ho.
....
>Sooner or later her kids will start detesting her for what
>she is doing to their future. What a weakling, ...
>They spit on her wrinkled face. They teach their children
>to defecate on her ...
>Even ... won't fuck her when she is eventually offloaded.
>What a disgusting bitch.
....
>
....
>Because the shit-vagina 'ho is a complete and utter
>weakling, fool, ... She is suppressive to the top of her
>soon-to-be-inoperative fallopian tubes. Menopause won't
>come too soon for that bitch. What a hairy gelatinous
>scab in the filthy drain of the gene pool.
>You, shit vagina-whore, are a laughing stock.
>
>Internationally. Forever.
>Keep bending over and spreading 'em, ... A LOT more to come!"
END OF POSTING
>C168 0477 7302 C208 F3AC B8D2 33C5 7FCC 0D52 F028
--
Rod Keller / rke...@voicenet.com / Irresponsible Publisher
Black Hat #1 / Expert of the Toilet / Golden Gate Bridge Club
The Lerma Apologist / Merchant of Chaos / Kha Khan countdown: 9 to go
Killer Rod / OSA Patsy / Quasi-Scieno / Mental Bully
Keith Henson
Rod Keller (rke...@netaxs.com) wrote:
: She's been posting about Grady to groups like alt.fashion.
Will the clams *never* learn? This is stupid beyond belief. The
followup which I will do right now is to post the URL for Jeff's Lisa page.
Keith Henson
pli...@rocketmail.com
In article <633cfu$o...@netaxs.com>, rke...@netaxs.com says...
>wgert (wg...@loop.com) wrote:
>: rke...@netaxs.com (Rod Keller) wrote:
>: >She's been posting about Grady to groups like alt.fashion.
>:
>: And ... what's your point? Are you know the usenet censor?
>
>My point is to inform people about Jenny, the AOL clam. Her post is
>on-topic for a.r.s. I find it particularly interesting that she chose to
>post it to an off-topic newsgroup. I could have suggested a dozen
>newsgroups that would be more appropriate,
But you didn't. Its not so safe as the expected canned answers from ARSCC.
>but she chose alt.fashion. I
>find that amusing, that she would post an off-topic message to complain
>about Grady, who was falsely accused of being off-topic.
Where did Jenny mentions Grady's name? The only person that mentioned Grady's
name on alt.fashion is Warrior.
What she did was attempt to get some opinions from people who don't have a
vested interest in the outcome.
Patrick
Rod Keller
wgert (wg...@loop.com) wrote:
: rke...@netaxs.com (Rod Keller) wrote:
: >She's been posting about Grady to groups like alt.fashion.
:
: And ... what's your point? Are you know the usenet censor?
My point is to inform people about Jenny, the AOL clam. Her post is
on-topic for a.r.s. I find it particularly interesting that she chose to
post it to an off-topic newsgroup. I could have suggested a dozen
newsgroups that would be more appropriate, but she chose alt.fashion. I
find that amusing, that she would post an off-topic message to complain
about Grady, who was falsely accused of being off-topic.
I can't imagine how reposting her message to a.r.s can be considered
censorship. How silly.
RonsAmigo
pli...@rocketmail.com wrote:
>
>Where did Jenny mentions Grady's name? The only person that mentioned
>Grady's
>name on alt.fashion is Warrior.
>
>
Way to go Warrior!
Complain to his ISP, Grady.
Amigo
Rod Keller
pli...@rocketmail.com wrote:
: In article <633cfu$o...@netaxs.com>, rke...@netaxs.com says...
: >My point is to inform people about Jenny, the AOL clam. Her post is
: >on-topic for a.r.s. I find it particularly interesting that she chose to
: >post it to an off-topic newsgroup. I could have suggested a dozen
: >newsgroups that would be more appropriate,
: But you didn't. Its not so safe as the expected canned answers from ARSCC.
But who knew she was looking for groups to post to? I hereby offer to
suggest appropriate newsgroups to any Scientologist who wants to post
about Scientology. Email me at rke...@voicenet.com
alt.fashion will never be one of the suggestions.
: >but she chose alt.fashion. I
: >find that amusing, that she would post an off-topic message to complain
: >about Grady, who was falsely accused of being off-topic.
:
: Where did Jenny mentions Grady's name? The only person that mentioned Grady's
: name on alt.fashion is Warrior.
:
: What she did was attempt to get some opinions from people who don't have a
: vested interest in the outcome.
It's irrelevant that she didn't mention Grady's name, the post is about
Grady. I think that makes it a little dishonest, not mentioning the person
she is complaining about.
"Vested" interest means monetary interest, no? Nobody here has a vested
interest, except Grady. Scientology wants to get a judgment against him.
Fat chance, since I don't think they have a shred of evidence.
James Wood
On 28 Oct 1997 08:04:05 GMT, rons...@aol.com (RonsAmigo)
wrote:
>pli...@rocketmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>>Where did Jenny mentions Grady's name? The only person that mentioned
>>Grady's
>>name on alt.fashion is Warrior.
>>
>>
>
>Way to go Warrior!
>Complain to his ISP, Grady.
>
>Amigo
Hey! They're tag-teaming! PLight, RonsA AND wgert! Well done!
Now, do you think you could enter into some real comm about your
chosen faith?
Do you think it was ethically correct (I'm not using a
scientology definition of ethics here) for scientology to move
into Clearwater, Florida under the guise of United Churches of
Florida and Southern Land Development and Leasing to prevent
people from knowing who they really were?
Do scientologists always lie like this?
Is it correct scientology teaching to lie to get what you want?
Why did they do that?
James
jbwebb
> :
> : Where did Jenny mentions Grady's name? The only person that mentioned Grady's
> : name on alt.fashion is Warrior.
> : What she did was attempt to get some opinions from people who don't have a
> : vested interest in the outcome.
>
> It's irrelevant that she didn't mention Grady's name, the post is about
> Grady. I think that makes it a little dishonest, not mentioning the person
> she is complaining about.
>
Interesting, because in the "washington" letter about the kids, Grady
wasn't mentioned either. Someone then posted a followup,
mistinterpreting whose children were being talked about.
Typical foot bullet tactics.
Take care
Joni
Paul
pli...@rocketmail.com wrote:
> What she did was attempt to get some opinions from people who don't have a
> vested interest in the outcome.
...and who, no doubt, couldn't care less about the outcome, because it's
completely inappropriate for the newsgroup to which she posted; i.e.,
she did precisely what wgert accused Grady Ward of doing. We can now
expect wgert to send a message to AOL asking them to close her account,
right?
-Paul
Xenu Mania
On 28 Oct 1997, RonsAmigo wrote:
> Way to go Warrior!
> Complain to his ISP, Grady.
Who wrote this anyway? What happened to the real ronamigo? Did he
turn into a xenuamigo?
Joe Cisar
reply to: iy...@cleveland.freenet.edu Xenu Mania
http://www.innernet.net/joecisar/conmenu.htm
The biggest men with the biggest ideas can be shot down by the
smallest men with the smallest minds. Think big anyway.
Martin Hunt
>rke...@netaxs.com (Rod Keller) wrote:
>
>>She's been posting about Grady to groups like alt.fashion.
>
>And ... what's your point? Are you know the usenet censor?
He wasn't "censoring" the whacked-out, brain-dead cultie's posts;
he was speading them around so even more people can see what a
lying, snivelling little turd she is - the exact opposite of
censorship, you toad.
--
Cogito, ergo sum. Use "Xenu" in Subject: line of email.
Martin Hunt
In article <19971030075...@ladder01.news.aol.com>,
mikes...@aol.com (MikeSmith3) wrote:
>On 29 Oct 1997 20:22:29 -0800, mar...@islandnet.com (Martin Hunt) wrote:
>>He wasn't "censoring" the whacked-out, brain-dead cultie's
>>posts; he was speading them around so even more people
>>can see what a lying, snivelling little turd she is - the exact
>>opposite of censorship, you toad.
>
>You sure you used enough adjectives there, Butch?
Actually, "cultie", "turd" and "toad" are nouns; better re-do your
Key to Life course, Mike. <snicker>
--
Cogito, ergo sum. Use "Xenu" in Subject: line of email.
.
.
.
.
.
.
William Barwell
In article <19971030075...@ladder01.news.aol.com>,
MikeSmith3 <mikes...@aol.com> wrote:
>On 29 Oct 1997 20:22:29 -0800, mar...@islandnet.com (Martin Hunt) wrote:
>
>>
>>He wasn't "censoring" the whacked-out, brain-dead cultie's
>>posts; he was speading them around so even more people
>>can see what a lying, snivelling little turd she is - the exact
>>opposite of censorship, you toad.
>
>You sure you used enough adjectives there, Butch?
What a cute lil one liner. Misses the point and is generally
witless.
Mike, answe my repeated question to you and Gertie.
What is your opinion of the true fact that Lyin' Ron
Hubbard falsely claimed to be almost blind and crippled and
abanodoned by his family at the end of WWI.
When in actuality, he was whole and healthy, and abandoned
his family to go play sex magician at Parson's OTO temple?
Why does Scientology still spread this infamous lie on
his own family in "What is Scientology?"?
Why is this lie passed on still on Scientology's website?
When will the cult stop lying on teh young wife and two small children
Hubbard abandoned to go play black magician?
Doe sthis embarress you in teh slightest? Do you care anything
at all about the fact your cult is rapidly becoming notorious
for this embarressing lie?
Pope Charles
SubGenius Pope Of Houston
Slack!