Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.religion.scientology
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Smear Campaign against Whistleblower Monica Pignotti Continues
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Monica Pignotti  
View profile  
 More options Jun 9 2011, 7:26 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Monica Pignotti <monica.pignotti....@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 04:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jun 9 2011 7:26 am
Subject: Re: Smear Campaign against Whistleblower Monica Pignotti Continues
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Jun 9, 12:58 am, Kat <ladyas...@comcast.net> wrote:

> On Jun 9, 12:49 am, Dennis Erlich <infor...@informer.org> wrote:

> > John Dorsay <restimula...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The entrenched
> > >authorities do *not* want to confront the issues she raises, because
> > >they have long been complicit in the abuse she is exposing.

> > That may very well be true, John.  But remember, restraining
> > out-of-control children (or people in society for that matter) is as
> > old as humans.  If practitioners consider it a "treatment" rather than
> > a temporary solution to a potentially destructive person, that's a bit
> > strange to me.  But it still could make sense.  So where's the massive
> > other side to the argument which the establishment supposedly is
> > defending against Monica's <snicker> whistleblowing.

> Were this anyone else but Monica, would you even care enough about the
> issue to play devil's advocate?

Yes, exactly, Kat. He wouldn't give it a second thought, were this
anyone else.

> > There must be another side to the argument.  I don't want to have to
> > be the one to take it tho.  So why not post her shit to the
> > appropriate newsgroup and see if it adds any actual CONTENT to usenet.
> > I submit she's detracting from the on topic content here with her
> > stupid rebuttals to unseen troll posts, all the while putting the
> > newsgroup and usenet in general down, down, down.

> Cause, you know the 6+ months of her not answering the trolls did
> soooooooooooooo much to stop them /eyeroll. While this issue IS off
> topic, this is the same crap that the cult of Scientology does to it's
> critics. Do you blame the critics of scientology when they are Fair
> Gamed?

Dennis might be interesting to know that I carefully reviewed the
other side to the argument and had a thoughtful discussion of its
merits. This only goes to show that he is jumping to unwarranted
conclusions without ever having actually read my blog and the
arguments I have presented.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google