Official Policies of the "church". RULES for CULT OPERATIVES (leaked)
Kymus
>Anti...@galacticfederation.homeip.net
What in insipid forgery. I suppose you count yourself ahead in the game for
being able to fool the newbies.
>RULES for CULT OPERATIVES (leaked)
So long as "leaked" is understood to mean "replicated from my harddrive, where
it has resided since I forged it".
>Note: the cult of scientology's tactics to ruin critics and disrupt
>dissident groups include the following reverse processing techniques:
>
>
>1. Make the wrong indication where ever possible.
>
>If a person makes a joke, find a way to turn it into a serious and
>deratory remark. For instance; Say the person tells a blond joke, but
>doesn't mention the sex of the blond, you can with little effort infer
>the person hates blonds, and women and has been sending nasty private
>email to women on the group...who then can claim they erased it in
>disgust. Thats a good way to ruin a person.
>
>This enturbulates the person greatly and forces them to spend hours
>digging up data to refute your remark. This combination of
>entubulation, the wrong indication and force is quite effective in
>degrading a person over time. Some SP's can be driven to suicide by
>this tactic alone, especially if you can manage to ruin them on the job
>and disrupt the income. this works especially well on people with
>children.
>
>
>If the person does not comit suicice, that is still time away from his
>or her business or family. Enough of this takes a toll..... later as
>the persons life is ruined more markedly, you can get that evidence and
>use it it destroy him further.
>
>
>
>2. Force this wrong indication on the person in as many ways and from
>as many different directions as possible.
>
>Accuse the person of lying and force him to prove he didn't lie, this
>will take many hours of his time also. If he has not saved all of his
>posts, and email, and filed them accurately and all other posts for the
>last 5 years he will not be able to prove he didnt lie... then you
>should be able to crush him totally, especially if you have logs and
>can find a post that at least seems to support your position.
>
>Team up have several team members make the same accusation creating the
>impression to on lookers that all on the NG are against the person.
>
>
>3. Lie to defame or discredit the person.
>
>The SP has no rights, so you can lie cheat or steal from the person
>with impunity (LRH policy). The best lies are ad hominem, not based in
>fact and can neither be proven or disproven but they discredit none the
>less. So don't address the issues with critics, because the issues can
>be easily documented, only engage in ad hominem attack.
>
>You will get support from our private detectives, hit men, thugs,
>whores, blackmailers, espionage agents and pimps in the field... we
>employ them by the thousands, Talon Security is not on the case as
>well... so you are in good hands, you will be fed data folders and
>photos' of your targets that can be used to invalidate, harrass, or
>abuse the person. If you see the person breaking, pile on in teams, let
>Talon know, with persistence and luck maybe we can taunt the person
>into some violent act and get him arrested and sent to prison, others
>can be driven to suicide. Either way we get them off the street.
>
>
>4. Use innuendo to defame or discredit the person.
>
>At every opportunity use innuendo to defame, discredit, make less of or
>taunt the person. Remember every stress takes its toll, and in time the
>target will collapse. We can always up the gradient. If you activity
>does not produce a blow from the NG, we can send in whores, and get
>photo's, plant kiddie porn at the persons desk at work then notify
>security there...many things. The sun never sets on scientology.
>
>5. Always demand 100% proof on any comment, if the person does not post
>all the court documents to prove his point conclusively, even if he is
>just stating an opinion, call him very forcefully a liar.
>
>(force is a key word here, use all of the prep check buttons, and
>reverse them, for instance deny the person said what he said, deny that
>you said what you said, force these issues, if the person says one
>swear word accuse the person of being a pervert then enforce that
>notion in as many posts by as many team members as you can.)
>
>Overwhelm the target with lies, false accusations, innuendo's,
>evaluations regarding the persons mental conditions, invalidate every
>possible aspect of a persons life that you can.
>
>
>6. Ignore any decent thing the person says. Ignore any post that will
>make the person look good.
>
>
>7. Twist anything that can be twisted in order to make a decent or
>objective remark or a joke into a vile or degrading comment. (then
>force, that on the person repeatedly.... enforced reality is a key
>tactic, there are many nuances on this, you can coach your field ops in
>this tactic as well.....for instance you can say to the person hat you
>have hard core documents that prove he or she is a child molester, when
>both you and the target know that no such evidence could exist, but its
>so out reality if you say it with conviction that the target with any
>luck might go into pschotic break under that stress... )
>
>Remember there is no such thing as an overt act against a suppressive
>person.
>
>
>8. Lie to the persons friends in private email in order to create
>dissent.
>
>
>9. Create ARC with the biggest targets on first arrival, then at the
>first opportunity ruthlessly attack the person to crush him or her
>totally. Make sure the attack is ruthless, and on some trivial issue so
>as to break the reality of the person totally. Send the blow in private
>email, then post whatever you can dream up to the NG in order to
>invalidate the person... hit the person as viciously and from as many
>different angles as possible in order to disburse and fragment the
>persons Life and attention. Ruin them utterly is the term LRH used.
>
>10. Last but not least, stick together, support each other, while
>teaming up to invalidate, confuse, ruin, invalidate, and destroy the
>target.
==
When a newbie asked "What is the name of scientology's secret books?"
ShyDavid (David Rice) replied "Mein Kamph".
Message-ID: <3bef3c24.6167606@localhost>
Another day, another a.r.s. post, same stupid bullshit as always.
==
©Anti-Cult® - www.users.wineasy.se/noname/
Note: the cult of scientology's tactics to ruin critics and disrupt
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"The court record is replete with evidence that Scientology is
nothing in reality but a vast enterprise to extract the maximum
amount of money from its adepts by pseudo scientific theories... and
to exercise a kind of blackmail against persons who do not wish to
continue with their sect...The organization clearly is schizophrenic
and paranoid, and this bizarre combination seems to be a reflection
of its founder, L.Ron Hubbard."
Judge Paul Breckenridge, Los Angeles Superior Court
---------------------------------------------------------------------
******* Body thetans? We don't need no stinking Body Thetans! *******
*********** http://www.users.wineasy.se/noname/index.htm ************
IRC #Scientology JavaChat http://www.users.wineasy.se/noname/irc.html
* Multimedia: http://www.users.wineasy.se/noname/multimed/index.htm *
******************* ze...@wineasy.se (Anti-Cult) ********************
---------------------------------------------------------------------
roger gonnet
"LaserClam" <lase...@aol.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
20011121231958...@mb-cm.aol.com...
> >
> >Note: the cult of scientology's tactics to ruin critics and disrupt
> >dissident groups include the following reverse processing techniques:
> >
>
Processing: the faked psychology system invented by Ron Hubbard to lure
people into an insane and infinite search for hope.
Whatever you use it the suppposedly "correct" way , or the supposedly
"squirrel" or "balck" one, you'll get the same results. While, for some
times, the person can feel great about the said processes, particularly when
done outside of the scam direction, these processes can't go nowhere else
than craziness, more or less visible.
roger
>
>
>
>
roger gonnet
Reminds me the Kim Baker text about scientology pushing hate. (must be
somewhere in arnie's and Andreas files)
"©Anti-Cult® - www.users.wineasy.se/noname/"
<Anti...@galacticfederation.homeip.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
9kjovtk0s5r858r35...@ARSCC.Sweden.Dep.OSA.Surveillance...
LaserClam
>Note: the cult of scientology's tactics to ruin critics and disrupt
>dissident groups include the following reverse processing techniques:
>
Can you define processing for us?
Joe's Garage
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/ The complaints on those
pages are all fake.
For instance, look at Gerry Armstrong's page. One of his main
accomplishments was to help Russel Miller with the information he used in
the book, "Bare-Faced Messiah." But Scientology does not want you to read
"Bare-Faced Messiah," therefore it does not list what its true
disagreement with Gerry was.
This has several an interesting implication.
Since Armstrong presented an aspect of Scientology and Scientology
cannot confront what Armstrong presented, that means that Scientology
cannot confront itself.
Scientology can confront critics all day long, but it cannot confront,
much less debate, its own duplicitious nature.
Joe Cisar, Xenu apologist
What tripped Scientology's trigger?
http://www.innernet.net/joecisar/trip0000.htm
Media, read what made me Scientology Public Enemy nbr. 46
http://www.xenu.net/archive/thesis/cisar-home.html
©Anti-Cult® - www.users.wineasy.se/noname/
In Message-ID: <20011121231958...@mb-cm.aol.com>
From: lase...@aol.com (LaserClam).
Organization: AOL Canada http://www.aol.ca.
Wrote on the subject: Re: Official Policies of the "church". RULES for
CULT OPERATIVES (leaked):
>>
>>Note: the cult of scientology's tactics to ruin critics and disrupt
>>dissident groups include the following reverse processing techniques:
>>
>
> Can you define processing for us?
>
>
>
Who are us?
SAZ
ptsc
wrote:
>Ecellent!
>Reminds me the Kim Baker text about scientology pushing hate. (must be
>somewhere in arnie's and Andreas files)
Tilman has it.
http://home.snafu.de/tilman/mystory/kimhate.txt
From: Kim Baker
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: How they manufacture hate in you
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 1995 07:10:10 GMT
X-Broken-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 1995 09:09:50 SAST-2
You are dealing with a group of people who are deliberately
cultivating your hate and anger.
Listen here, and listen well - the Capricorn Document was one of the
most valuable things posted here. (Thanks, Capricorn). The point is
not whether the CoS are going to do a RICO campaign, or not, etc, etc
- THE most valuable information was in revealing their strategy for
cultivating hatred. For provoking people into saying things that are
rash.
As an ex-auditor, I learnt the basics for auditing. I'm not going to
get technical here, I have no time to translate. Remember, whether
you think the auditing is a load of bologna or not, Hubbard was
able to manipulate and control people. That is a FACT.
And, there are several recognised techniques for "driving up the TA"
- or getting the person furious. These techniques were considered
crimes, bad things to happen in an auditing session. However, I have
personally observed Woody use them here, on people in ars. These may
sound like no big deal, but take a moment to think about it - they're
so simple, but they work every time, if the person is not aware of
them.
- Ignore completely what a person is saying.
- Twist what they say to make it sound like something else,
and stick to that - the person will get furious at being
permanently misunderstood.
- Take what the person says, and make nothing of it
- Interrupt a person constantly while they are trying to say something
- in an electronic medium, that would mean snipping the text
and focusing on some obscure point, and not the basic gist of
the message.
Now before you laugh, think well on those. Try it in a conversatiuon
with a friend, and watch them froth.
I concur completely with the statements made by Capricorn - the CoS
is now going all out to manufacture as MUCH hate as possible. Which
is why, when giving vent to your anger, it is essential you STATE THE
REASON WHY.
In 1992, The CoS published a book called "Hate and Propoganda - the
anatomy of hate". A very revealing book, I don't have it with me
right now, but see if you can get hold of it. It was published as a
counter-propganda measure against the assault it was receiving in
Germany. Now, while the obvious techniques were laughable, and
transparent (pages of pictures drawing parallels between the Nazi
depiction of Jews, and the critics depiction of Scientologists,
unflattering pictures of German politicians who were opposed to the
CoS, cries of how Scientologists were receiving death threats, etc),
the documentation of how INDIVIDUAL Scientologists were being
persecuted was THE most effective thing.
Plus a long list of various Human Rights Commissions over the world
where Scientologists could write, to voice their outrage at the
PERSECUTION of Scientolgists. That's quite smart. Don't worry,
governments have done this sort of thing too. It's not a new
technique. It's just a hell of a surprise to find an organisation
that calls itself a religious organisation, using these, and other
techniques.
The individual Scientologists are often just the cannon fodder behind
which RTC hides. They are often decent people, as I have stated in
previous posts, who are uninformed, or trapped, or afraid, or just
love the religion. I stress again THEY ARE NOT THE TARGET. They are
humans.
The TARGET IS: the RTC and the METHODS they use. Stick to that,
always, and no amount of manufactured lying by Church representatives
will be able to get around that. And notice THIS: Whenever anyone is
getting close to revealing any of the REAL issues, which the Church
does NOT want the public to know about - they get raided, or litigated
against, ANYTHING to silence them. Witness how close Larry and Bob
are.
The Church's strategy is always to go for the "source" which is
often, the most intelligent, and most close to the truth - so, they
don't worry about the public outrage. The RTC have very little
humanity left in them - so don't think for a minute that you are
dealing with normal people here - who will feel pain, or respond
to other's opinions of them - they LAUGH in the face of public
outrage.
You are dealing with cold, unfeeling machines, perfect computing
machines, who view the world and people as one big "Re-active Mind".
Look well on this image, for THAT is the face of the monster we are
fighting. Keep that image in mind whenever you post - always see
beyond individual Scientologist who posts, the HUMAN. They may
have to a greater, or lesser degree, the Cold Dark Monster in them,
but they did NOT create it.
I know, I have been there.
I went into the heart of darkness, and saw pure evil.
And I came back.
k.b.