Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Beware - there are SPs on the newsgroup
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Jens Tingleff  
View profile
 More options Dec 16 2005, 2:46 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Jens Tingleff <jenst...@tingleff.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:46:30 +0000
Local: Fri, Dec 16 2005 2:46 am
Subject: Re: Beware - there are SPs on the newsgroup
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alex wrote:
> In article <1134655311.167368.136...@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>  "RolandRB" <rolandbe...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> If you are a Scientologist in good standing then you should not be
>> reading this newsgroup. Your Church has forbidden it and although you
>> have set out on the "Bridge to Total Freedom(tm)" your "Freedom" does
>> NOT include disobeying the dictates of your Church. The reason your are
>> warned not to read the posts here is because there are SPs here trying
>> to enturbulate you. One type of post you should never read is the ones
>> where they use the phrase "I am mocking up my own reactive mind" in it
>> somewhere. You must not read this phrase if you are a preclear. That is
>> because it is the "Clear Cognition" and reading it and knowing that it
>> is the Clear Cognition could stall your progress on the Bridge to Total
>> Freedom. So be warned.

> Sir.

> I am not aware of the Church of Scientology forbiding its members from
> reading this newsgroup.

> Do you have any reference to such? (Other than anecdotal?)

Whether there is a policy or not is - IMHO - irrelevent, when we can
observe, for instance, Claire Swazey being declared for taking part in
discussions here[1]. You may conside4r that anecdotal, I suggest you ask
her directly.

Anyway, since "purpose is senior policy," the victims of the criminal
organisation known as the "church" <spit> of $cientology don't care whether
there is a policy or not.

> Your attempt to introvert people by your "warning" is simply that, an
> attempt to stop or diminish peoples reach for information.

Yeah, well, you don't get it ;-).

Best Regards

        Jens

[1] Message-ID: <3bd0e...@news2.lightlink.com>

- --
    Key ID 0x09723C12, jenst...@tingleff.org
        Analogue filtering / 5GHz RLAN / Mdk Linux / odds and ends
    http://www.tingleff.org/jensting/             +44 1223 211 585
 "All day at the office, micro-fishing with chips"  Vivian Stanshall
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDonDbimJs3AlyPBIRAu7UAJ9N5JGuZ1Fq8ZBYV2x6GmURXYAbkQCfd23D
i9I8IRg++wvL0wkQ8sNy+8o=
=0DWy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google