Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Wolf <wolft...@micron.net>
Date: 1998/06/05
Subject: Re: Humor vs. Joking & Degrading
Keith Henson wrote: It might be considerably less than 50/50 Keith. Interesting though that > Wolf (wolft...@micron.net) wrote: > : > Wolf <wolft...@micron.net> writes: > Wolf, I think you could match posters for having/not having experience. three of the above posters are three of the most vulgar, contemptious and crass posters on ARS. Anything that is posted that does not meet with their approval is roundly answered with at least one or more of these words/phrases: fuck - you - piece - of - shit - asshole - blow - turd - cunt - fuckwit and so on. The internet is indeed a model of free speech... not to mention public domain. How come these bright boys haven't considered how archived files of their true nature might look in the public's mind? > : > This is the "how do you know heroin is bad if you haven't tried it" No doubt many of them are fun. I'd argue with you on the bitter though. > : > school of "thinking", is it? > : There really aren't any shades of grey in your thought patterns are there > It's just an observation, Wolf. Also, I have met a *lot* of the critics It's hard to write thousands of articles to a ng without the true nature of what drives you showing through. Dennis is less bitter, I'll agree.. but he is bitter. Pope? Martin? A definite yes on bitterness. Maybe not for Grady. Certainly not for you. As for the picket invite... Keith, you know better than that. Have fun Wolf You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||