Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Hubbard's college grades
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Anonymous  
View profile  
 More options Aug 19 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Anonymous <nob...@replay.com>
Date: 1998/08/19
Subject: Re: Hubbard's college grades

Stanley Anderson <anders...@delphi.com> wrote:
>Anonymous <nob...@replay.com> writes:

>>No, it doesn't prove that LRH lied about his grades. You can have high
>>grades and still fail to get your degree, because you stopped your
>>studies, for example.

>You can have high grades and fail to get a degree; but you _can't_ have
>flunking grades, drop out of college, and get a (valid) degree.

>Given that Hubbard's grades were low; that he dropped out of college;
>his claim of a degree is a lie; and it is a lie that necessarily encom-
>passes that he 1) attended college for a sufficient period of time;
>2) while making grades in his courses which were sufficient;
>3) to obtain a degree in a chosen field.

>We know that Hubbard didn't attend college long enough to get a
>degree; didn't make grades in his courses which would have been
>sufficient to get a degree had he continued to attend college;
>and 3) diddn't obtain a degree (except that phony 'doctorate' from
>a diploma mill).

Again, these are all "proofs by implication", which in *no* is an
acceptable proof to sustain the statement that "it is not just that
Hubbard got low grades but he lied about them time after time."

If you are going to make such claim, you better come up with hard
proof about it, i.e. actual quotes about him lying about his grades,
not some fancy explanations that can be argued back and forth until
you get blue in the face.

>If you claim to have been elected President of the United States, I
>will state that you lied about getting enough votes in Texas to be
>elected.

Why? Is Texas now the United States? This is getting weirder and
weirder.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.