Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.religion.scientology
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Smear Campaign against Whistleblower Monica Pignotti Continues
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Monica Pignotti  
View profile  
 More options Jun 9 2011, 7:31 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Monica Pignotti <monica.pignotti....@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 04:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jun 9 2011 7:31 am
Subject: Re: Smear Campaign against Whistleblower Monica Pignotti Continues
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Jun 9, 12:49 am, Dennis Erlich <infor...@informer.org> wrote:

> John Dorsay <restimula...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The entrenched
> >authorities do *not* want to confront the issues she raises, because
> >they have long been complicit in the abuse she is exposing.

> That may very well be true, John.  But remember, restraining
> out-of-control children (or people in society for that matter) is as
> old as humans.  If practitioners consider it a "treatment" rather than
> a temporary solution to a potentially destructive person, that's a bit
> strange to me.  But it still could make sense.  So where's the massive
> other side to the argument which the establishment supposedly is
> defending against Monica's <snicker> whistleblowing.

> There must be another side to the argument.  

This proves you have not read my blog and are jumping to unwarranted
conclusions that support your intent to attack me. My style is to
intentionally seek out the very best arguments from the "other side"
and discuss that. I did that on my blog. I presented the very best
arguments in favor of not banning prone restraints.

>I don't want to have to  be the one to take it tho.  
>So why not post her shit to the
> appropriate newsgroup and see if it adds any actual CONTENT to usenet.

We've been through this before. You seem to be about 15 years out of
date of you think meaningful discussions on topics like this still
occur on usenet. Usenet is not where these kinds of things usually get
thoughtful discussions. The "appropriate" newsgroups are full of spam
and do not discuss this topic. I have discussed it on many other
forums on the internet.

> I submit she's detracting from the on topic content here with her
> stupid rebuttals to unseen troll posts, all the while putting the
> newsgroup and usenet in general down, down, down.

It's not a matter of putting usenet down. It's recognition of the
facts at hand that anyone who looks at usenet can readily see. It is
not the place to have a meaningful discussions anymore. My repeated
attempts to have them with you are a case in point.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google