Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Disconnection
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Claire Swazey  
View profile  
 More options Jul 2 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Claire Swazey <swa...@home.com>
Date: 1998/07/02
Subject: Re: Disconnection

Tashback wrote:

> In article <359AE2B0.32D75...@home.com>, Claire Swazey <swa...@home.com> wrote:

> > If my family were giving me a bad time about ANYTHING I am doing and
> > trying to get me to stop doing whatever it was I would DEFINITELY have a
> > problem with that.Wouldn't matter what it was, if it was what I wanted
> > to do and my folks were making my life purgatory over it, I would have
> > to either work with them to restore harmony in the family so that I
> > could do the things I wanted to do (as an adult) or I would have to look
> > long and hard at that relationship, whether I was connected with CofS or
> > not.

> Sure. Those are decisions adults make. You don't need the organization to
> which you belong to make them for you. You and I agree on that?

Of course.  I make my decisions for myself.  If the Church ever asked or
told me to do something I would think about it and decide if *I* wanted
to do it or not.  If I didnt want to do it, I wouldn't.  And this has
come up before, believe me.  It is the responsibility of Scientologists
(and really,anyone) to do what they think is right regardless of what
anyone else thinks is right.  Even if the people in disagreement with
them were Church Officials or what have you.  This is something I truly
believe and practice and I have not pleased all the people in the CofS
all the time,for sure.

Claire

> > Tashback wrote:

> > > In article <359870B3.CB2D0...@home.com>, Claire Swazey
> <swa...@home.com> wrote:

> > > > Tashback wrote:

> > > <snip>

> > > > > You want to defend the concept that it's wise to disconnect from abusers
> > > > > and molesters? Gosh, yeah, that's a good idea. But that's not what
> > > > > Scientological disconnection is about, and you know it's not.

> > > > > Tash

> > > > I don't know any such thing. I refer you to my post wherein I described
> > > > my unusual family and the fact that I have never been asked or told to
> > > > disconnect from them.

> > > I see nothing unusual about your family situation. I know loads of people
> > > who have embraced faiths/beliefs different from those of their parents,
> > > and even the *idea* that their chosen churches/organizations would demand
> > > disconnection from family would be ludicrous. Why do you think your family
> > > is unusual?

> > let's see, Daddy was squirreling,Daddy was asking the church for his
> > money back (which he did get back),Mommy was rather vocal in her
> > opinions about the Church (really cool Mom,but can be rather
> > sharp-tongued) and other family member was in the psych ward with
> > slashed wrists,electroshock therapy,various psychotropic medications, I
> > was visiting her daily and I was under alot of pressure to support the
> > family at this time in supporting her therapy--nah, nothing unusual
> > about that.  Why, I bet 9 out of 10 Scn'ologists surveyed have the exact
> > same history. Sure,ok.

> That's my point; there is nothing unusual about it *outside of
> Scientology*. It's *normal* outside of Scientology to have parents who
> disagree with your choices and who are vocal about it. It's *normal* to
> have friends who make choices different from those you would make, and to
> support them in those choices because of the strength of the friendship
> (and also because they might be right and you might be wrong). There is
> nothing unusual in that. You seem to imply that it is unusual for a
> *Scientologist* to be in such a situation, and perhaps that's so. But it's
> not unusual outside of Scientology.

> <snip>

> > I have a couple other postings/replies on this as well with another
> > example or two.  I really have seen little or no demanding.

> OK. I look forward to reading your posts. I hope you will respond to DeoMorto.

> Tash


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google