Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Criminal Questionnaire - Latest Update
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Barbara Schwarz  
View profile  
 More options Apr 5 2007, 5:31 pm
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Barbara Schwarz" <barbara.schw...@gmail.com>
Date: 5 Apr 2007 14:31:12 -0700
Local: Thurs, Apr 5 2007 5:31 pm
Subject: Re: Criminal Questionnaire - Latest Update
On Apr 5, 11:05 am, alex <alexrsi...@notmail.comdamnspam> wrote:

> In article <1175785856.709737.98...@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,

>  "SME" <larrybren12...@aol.com> wrote:

> snip

> > I say that, no matter what our differences, we can be organized and do
> > something about it if we want.

> > SME

> Yes "we" can. Although what you want to do about it is not what i want
> to do about it.

> You desire to take down the whole  church. This is evidenced by your
> statement "I'm not for the technology in either place", and your plans
> to put scientology under examination for its "psychological" damage.

> Also your pleas for information, and assurances that it is not necessary
> to contribute financially, are disingenuous. If a person were to come
> forward with information and attach their name to it, they had better
> have "representation", as the likelihood of them being subpoened,
> deposed, and possibly sued for slander or libel are real.
> Representation=$

> As I have publicly and privately pointed out to you, you are using a
> shotgun approach when a single target and more focused effort would be
> more effective.

> You continue to operate under the "ends justify the means" modus.

> Same modus as when you were in,  flipped goal.

> Simon Bolivar: If you take away someones game, the game becomes get you.

> DM got your game.

> alex

The subject line is killing me, Alex. :) Who wants to do a criminal
questionaire, unless it is a criminal?

--
The Wikipedia gang lies that I edited their article on me. This should
suggest that this article is correct as I contributed to it. In fact,
no word in this wrongful article is mine.

Number one suspect of being Wikipedia (Wikipiggi) smearer, defamer,
abuser, harasser, and hate monger "Orsini" is Canadian Kady O'Malley.
She defamed not only Mark (Marty) Rathbun and I - but according to
below website, fanatical O'Malley is specialized of harassing other
Scientologists too. What she is doing could be also defines as
stalking:
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.com/anti-religious-extremists/kady-o...

Copurights violations are also involved. Immediately after it was
published that Kady is the main "Orsini"-suspect, "Orsini" removed a
few copyright violating items but not all - but under the law, she is
also legally responsible for past copyright violations, current
copyright violations, defamation, abuse, harassment and libel.

"Orsini" teams up on Wikipedia with defamer, forger, and harasser
"Vivaldi", who drug rehab hating Korey Jerome Kruse from Olathe,
Kansas. He was recently in jail and is, according to the court, a
habital offender:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS210US211&q=kore...
Official records on him:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/4bdb50447...

These fanatical people are protected by a Wikipedia administrator from
England, with name Christopher Owens. Chris Owens is biased towards
Scientology and Scientologists and uses his bias to protect defamers
and harassers on Wikipedia and assist them in defaming Scientology and
Scientologists. He never bans any fanatical and harassing anti-
Scientologist from Wikipedia but Scientologists are banned for nothing
else but being Scientologists. Even non-Scientologists are banned from
Wikipedia, if they don't hate Scientology or Scientologists.

According to this website, Wikipedia administrator Christopher Owens
admires Osama  Bin Laden.
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.com/anti-religious-extremists/david-...

----
Barbara Schwarz


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.