> That may very well be true, John.  But remember, restraining
> out-of-control children (or people in society for that matter) is as
> old as humans.  If practitioners consider it a "treatment" rather than
> a temporary solution to a potentially destructive person, that's a bit
> strange to me.  But it still could make sense.  So where's the massive
> other side to the argument which the establishment supposedly is
> defending against Monica's <snicker> whistleblowing.

> There must be another side to the argument.  I don't want to have to
> be the one to take it tho.  So why not post her shit to the
> appropriate newsgroup and see if it adds any actual CONTENT to usenet.
> I submit she's detracting from the on topic content here with her
> stupid rebuttals to unseen troll posts, all the while putting the
> newsgroup and usenet in general down, down, down.