What's this lawsuit? Elliott v. CSI filed July 18 2008
banchukita
Elliott v. Church of Scientology International et al
Plaintiff: Jonathan Elliott
Defendant: Church of Scientology International, Flag Services
Organization Inc. and Religious Technology Center
Case Number: 9:2008cv80807
Filed: July 18, 2008
Court: Florida Southern District Court
Office: West Palm Beach Office [ Court Info ]
County: Palm Beach
Presiding Judge: Senior Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp
Nature of Suit: P. Petitions - General
Cause: no cause specified
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Amount Demanded: $7,200,000.00
cultxpt
> http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-flsdce/case_no-9:2008cv80807/c...
>
> Elliott v. Church of Scientology International et al
> Plaintiff: Jonathan Elliott
> Defendant: Church of Scientology International, Flag Services
> Organization Inc. and Religious Technology Center
>
> Case Number: 9:2008cv80807
> Filed: July 18, 2008
>
> Court: Florida Southern District Court
> Office: West Palm Beach Office [ Court Info ]
> County: Palm Beach
> Presiding Judge: Senior Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp
>
> Nature of Suit: P. Petitions - General
> Cause: no cause specified
> Jurisdiction: Federal Question
> Jury Demanded By: None
> Amount Demanded: $7,200,000.00
Maybe some anons in the area could go grab some court docs.
R. Hill
I didn't read yet. I will put the links on a web page for convenience:
http://www.xenu-directory.net/documents/20080718-elliott-florida.pdf
http://www.xenu-directory.net/documents/20080730-elliott-florida.pdf
Legal matters-literate people might help to understand what it is about.
--
Ray.
obscene dog
<banch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Amount Demanded: $7,200,000.00
They are insane.
--
Don't get in front of me.
Wait! Oh shi-
R. Hill
Outline:
* Memorandum of points and authorities in support of petition for writ
of habeas corpus (2.16 MiB)
o Jurisdiction
o The writ of habeas corpus is an appropriate remedy to
challenge the continued employment discrimination
o The Scientology policy is irreparably harmful
o Scientology policy has separated the work from the agent
o The court must oppose Scientology policy
o Scientology targeted celebrities for recruitment
o Taking control of the media is grounds for taking it back
and is compelling interest to the state
o Taking control of the media is grounds for taking it back
and is compelling interest to the state
o Conclusion
o Writ of habeas corpus
o Table of authorities cited
o Certificate of service
o Service list
o Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization Agreement
and General Release Regarding Spiritual Assistance
o Petition for writ of habeas corpus
o Certificate of service
o Service list
o Exhibits
http://www.xenu-directory.net/documents/200807-jonathanelliott-florida.html
--
Ray.
obscene dog
wrote:
>On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:42:07 -0700 (PDT), banchukita
><banch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Amount Demanded: $7,200,000.00
>
>They are insane.
Oops, my mistake. I thought the Cult was using a sledgehammer to crack
a nut again.
Let me try that again...
>Amount Demanded: $7,200,000.00
He's insane!
Eldon
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:39:30 +0100, obscene dog <obscene....@xenu.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:42:07 -0700 (PDT), banchukita
> ><banchuk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>Amount Demanded: $7,200,000.00
>
> >They are insane.
>
> Oops, my mistake. I thought the Cult was using a sledgehammer to crack
> a nut again.
>
> Let me try that again...
>
> >Amount Demanded: $7,200,000.00
>
> He's insane!
Not necessarily. People always ask for more than they expect to get.
At least his docs are smoother reading than the Letterese mess.
henri
He's claiming his talent agency failed because Scientology owns the
entire entertainment industry, and therefore, deserves a HABEAS CORPUS
WRIT (!) to fix the situation.
Appears mental.
R. Hill
So that makes two lawsuits which appears to be headed nowhere (Letterese
and this one.) If another of this kind comes along, I might be unable to
resist going 'hmmm'...
--
Ray.
http://www.whyaretheydead.net/krasel/ottman_html/01.htm
Lermanet.com Exposing the CON for over 10 years!
> henri wrote:
> > On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:23:32 -0400, "R. Hill"
> > <rh...@xenu-directory.net> wrote:
>
> >> banchukita wrote:
yeah, me too, hmmmm...
Scn inc has sued itself in the past, there was some weird lawsuit
between Building Services in LA and one of the opther clam entities,
it is too bad there wasn't someone there to explain to the judge that
both of these entities were run by the same dwarf. One entity was non
profit, the other was not..
Using color of law to move chunks of cash around that otherwise could
not be moved 'legally' ???
Of course this might be labeled as kooky conspiracy theory
speculation, however, I'm not the one with the prior conviction for
conspiracy.
barb
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:42:07 -0700 (PDT), banchukita
> <banch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Amount Demanded: $7,200,000.00
>
> They are insane.
>
Leaves room for negotiation. :)
--
Barb "That's Captain Barbossa to you!"
Chaplain, ARSCC (wdne)
It's Poodlin' Time!
“I think that the protections that we enjoy for freedom of worship exist
so long as we don’t step over the line. When religious worship and
belief cross over into things like fraud, victimization of others and
the disruption of the political arena, that protection is no longer
appropriate.”
--Robert Goff
Professor Emeritus, UCSC
banchukita
Maybe it's simply establishing a legal precedent to cover their asses
on what they think are their weak points?
They've been quick to cover their copyright issues with the Les Dane
suit by citing precedent of fair use.
-maggie, human being
> Of course this might be labeled as kooky conspiracy theory
> speculation, however, I'm not the one with the prior conviction for
> conspiracy.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
henri
<rh...@xenu-directory.net> wrote:
The new suit, calling itself a "habeas corpus" action, has been
assigned to the same judge as the old case under Local Rule 3.9(c).
That rule states:
---
C. Similar. Whenever an action or proceeding is filed in the Court
which involves subject matter which is a material part of the subject
matter of another action or proceeding then pending before
this Court, or for other reasons the disposition thereof would appear
to entail the unnecessary duplication of judicial labor if heard by a
different Judge, the Judges involved shall determine
whether the newly filed action or proceeding shall be transferred to
the Judge to whom the earlier filed action or proceeding is assigned.
---
Apparently, this is another case of a kook attempting to relitigate
issues he already lost on, based on some new freakish theory.
John Dorsay
> He's claiming his talent agency failed because Scientology owns the
> entire entertainment industry, and therefore, deserves a HABEAS CORPUS
> WRIT (!) to fix the situation.
Okay, I'll bite. WHERE'S THE BODY????
> Appears mental.
No kidding. There seems to be a lot of that going through Florida
courts these last few weeks.
John
Smurf the SP
I check the agency & the owner at the corporation/LLC search with
Florida Secretary of State & found nothing. But did find a very
interesting article from 2002 on defendant. Scam artist??
http://www.allbusiness.com/services/amusement-recreation-services/4380022-1.html
Smurf the SP
wrote:
Interesting: Jonathan Elliot posted this himself in July 2005 and no
one replied to it. Jonathan Elliott of Los Angeles wonders what
happened to his company. The Agency, a venue for commercials and
theatrical talent in Los Angeles went through a bizarre series of
robberies and interference before closing. Nothing particularly
enlightening has ever been written about the company. He is looking
for a new start in the business and suining competitors. His lawsuit
claims there was an incident of "quartering" at his family estate.
It is one of the first constitutional challenges in this legal domain.
Smurf the SP
This guy sounds like another Barbara Schwarz. he's suing Scientology
because he believes he was robbed of work opportunties & income
because "Scientology has a stranglehold on showbiz":
Jonathan Elliot posted this himself in July 2005 and no one replied to
it.
Jonathan Elliott of Los Angeles wonders what happened to his company.
The Agency, a venue for commercials and theatrical talent in Los
Angeles went through a bizarre series of robberies and interference
before closing. Nothing particularly enlightening has ever been
written about the company. He is looking for a new start in the
business and suining competitors. His lawsuit claims there was an
incident of "quartering" at his family estate. It is one of the first
constitutional challenges in this legal domain.
http://engforum.pravda.ru/showthread.php?t=128086
And on this website showing him to be in Florida with no address
listed (though a search on Zabasearch.com shows him to be living in
Boca Raton which is in Palm Beach County.
EVOLVE TALENT AGENCY
N/a N/a FL, 33444
Phone : 561-843-1402
Email : elliott...@gmail.com
http://www.everythinghaitian.com/BusinessListing.asp?Category=18
I'm betting this is his MySpace account. Delray Beach is just south of
Boca Raton & is in Palm Beach County as well. . Check out the
"Friends".. one is the "Church of Humatology" (which is a incomplete
page) & the 2 comments from 'Hopey Kaplan' who says she wishes he'd
come home... her MS page shows her to be in Los Angeles. The MySpace
page for his band has been de-activated.
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=102310047.
I found this hyperlink, but everytime I try to access it.. it boots
me out saying Internet Explorer cannot find page. But from what I
could read, the guys seems like a fruitcake with a conspiracy complex.
He previously filed a complaint in May 2006 suing Scientology for
"it's stranglehold on showbiz".
http://truthpatrol.blogspot.com/2006/05/ding-ding-round-1-scientology-again.html
Out_Of_The_Dark
>
> - Show quoted text -
No, this guy is real, a real nut too. :
scroll down a bit to see the 2006 Palm Springs Post article ( link is
now dead)
http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?t=28118&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=&sid=63364eb147cfb2f63e8a1a63dffee39b
henri
>henri wrote:
>> Appears mental.
The "body" appears to be some bizarre interpretation of the Latin
meaning of habeas corpus "you have the body" to refer to a body of
WORK, i.e. the corpus in that sense. Umm, nope. Doesn't work.
feministe
news:db290952-d34c-42f5...@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
seems it's aiming at getting scientology methods of sequestration forbidden.
r
elliott...@gmail.com
elliott...@gmail.com
Also, if you read my original complaint in 2003 against METLIFE, et. al, I said then I was in danger of losing our family residence of 30 years unless the Court's intervened and did something about it. The Church went so far as to threaten Sandra O'Connor not to put the case through and she resigned.
The house was sold. Now I face the challenge of being forcibly medicated for a period of two years and suffer a permanent disability called tardive dyskinesia because of the interjections of people JUST LIKE YOU.
Jonathan Elliott
