Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Proof of Scientology's racism in South Africa
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Chris Owen  
View profile  
 More options Oct 5 1996, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: c...@romeo-klive.nvg.unit.no (Chris Owen)
Date: 1996/10/05
Subject: Proof of Scientology's racism in South Africa

  In the course of my research into Scientology's fight against psychiatry,
 I came across a number of interesting items which for the first time prove
 conclusively that Scientology pursued a policy of racial discrimination
 within its South African organisation.  I thought I'd share them, as a sort
 of appendix to my "Scientology's Fight for Apartheid" article, which can
 be found at http://www.demon.co.uk/castle/audit/aprtheid.html (I'll
 probably rewrite that article slightly to take account of the new material
 I've found, but it won't happen for a while yet.)

  The first clue was a couple of photographs published in issue 19 of
 "Understanding", the magazine of the South African Hubbard Association of
 Scientology International (HASI SA).  The photos, dating from 1959, showed
 the staff of the Jo'burg org celebrating the second anniversary of its
 founding.  The two pictures were rigidly segregated: one showed a large
 group of solely white people, identified as "the staff and students",
 drinking champagne in a room decorated with party streamers and balloons.
 The other showed a small group of black people identified as "the African
 Staff" sitting around a small table in a back alley; the caption makes it
 clear that they were not allowed to have their party in working time (like
 the whites) but in their lunch hour.

  The next clue came from "Understanding" issue 13, in a photospread showing
 the staff of the Jo'burg org.  Without exception, the black staff held the
 most menial jobs - cleaner, guard, typist etc. - and the white staff held
 all the teaching or administrative posts.

  A third clue came from a Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin of 30 July
 1960, which included a piece from Norma Webb, HCO Secretary World Wide, on
 why HASI SA was proving so succesful.  It made it clear that Scientology was
 only being disseminated to whites -

     "How do they manage this [success], well there are several reasons ...
     Remember that they have only got 2 million white people living there,
     and they can do it!"

  Then came two conclusive pieces of evidence, both written by a South
 African Scientologist and published in *mainstream* - note, NOT just
 South African - Scientology magazines, consequently enjoying the approval
 of L. Ron Hubbard (who acted as editor-in-chief of international magazines).
 The Scientologist in question was U. Keith Gerry, who was definitely a
 favoured associate of Hubbard: in 1955 he had collaborated with Hubbard
 to produce an anthology of Hubbardian thought entitled "The Key
 to Tomorrow".  In a late 1950s issue of "Ability" magazine he wrote an
 article entitled "How It Is Going In South Africa".  This makes abundantly
 clear what Scientology's approach was in South Africa.  Remember, this was
 approved by L. Ron Hubbard himself: he was happy to endorse a racist and
 discriminatory approach despite his claimed commitment to equality:

    "... There is also a master plan of Albert Low's to which we are all
    contributing.  Albert's plan is to get Scientology known throughout
    the white population of South Africa within another four years; to
    have it established in that period in the schools; in the Universities;
    in industry; in the Mines; and in the Government and government
    departments and services...

     In case it all sounds too easy and too dull to attract more people to
    the field it would be just as well to give a few of the problems which
    we are up against.  The first is not the native problem.  It is the
    Afrikaans-English problem.  It can be expressed in many ways, none of
    which will give a full picture.  Perhaps it could be summed up by saying
    that the English feel guilty at having been conquerors and the Afrikaans
    people are resentful at having been conquered, and from this has arisen
    all the factors present today.  Before South Africa can be a happy
    country this division will have to be reconciled.

     After this comes the native problem and Scientology offers the only
    route to its solution.  False sentiment, ignorance, utterances from
    pulpit and editorial desk by people who should know better, continually
    impede progress.  When we can get the white people properly straightened
    out this problem will be nine-tenths solved, evolution and mass
    processing will do the rest.

     For anyone who wishes to see action, South Africa is going to be an
    intensely interesting country in the next few years.  We are not trying
    to patch up an old order but we are going to create a new one in a land
    with vast natural resources, with an active people who still retain that
    streak of courage and enthusiasm which led the voortrekkers into the
    unknown, with a vast number of natives who would be happy working with
    their hands for understanding employers, with an ideal climate and with
    the geographical position which can lead the whole of Africa to a happy
    and united future."

  It's pretty clear which side Gerry was on - amidst the welter of racial
 stereotypes, the condemnation of the critics of apartheid and the
 characterisation of the "natives" as obedient manual workers stand out.  But
 what was the Scientological justification for this benighted view, given
 that the philosophy was supposed to *support* equality, and why was racism
 only overt in the South African HASI and not elsewhere?  

 The key is in the third paragraph quoted above - the word "evolution", near
 the end.  In "Certainty" magazine vol. 1 issue 14 (Feb. 1955), Gerry
 explains the South African "native problem" from a Scientological
 viewpoint.  The underlying reason is simple: the blacks are simply further
 down the evolutionary ladder than the whites:

    "There is no room for sentiment in the native problem.  It is manifest
    as a conflict of the white reactive mind and the black reactive mind ...

     Those who have dwelt for many years in a stable society may come to
    feel that evolution is something that happened in the past and that it
    isn't happening any more.  This frame of mind leads to the belief that
    the differences, or the unbalanced states, which cause evolutionary
    changes to take place, no longer exist.  This leads to the belief that
    the white man and the black man are equal.  They are not.  To insist
    that they are is to try to perpetuate a lie and any Scientologist knows
    what that will lead to.  Ask any honest South African if he feels that
    he is the same as a native and he will deny it.  Ask any native if he
    feels the same as a white man and he, too, will deny it.  This is no
    discussion as to whether the native ought to be the same, whether he has
    the same potentials, whether he is better or worse, happier or unhappier,
    or whether he could become like the white man if this, that, or the
    other.  This is the matter of the cold-blooded fact that there is a very
    big difference between the white and the black man.  The native problem
    can never be 'solved' until that fact is accepted, for that very
    difference *is* the problem.  In the technical language of Scientology
    it is those who try to "not-is" that consideration or those who try to
    educate natives as white men in order to "not-is" it, who make the
    problem persist.  To see that a difference exists goes a long way to
    blowing the problem, in fact it goes more than a long way, it solves
    the problem.

     The solution of the problem does not end the evolutionary contest.  If
    the problem were to disappear immediately the process of evolution
    would go ahead quite smoothly.  While the problem persists it is likely
    that evolution will follow a bloody trail of force.  The end product
    will be the same.  The forces of evolution are far stronger than any
    individual who would try to deny they exist.

     There are in South Africa less than three million Europeans, or whites,
    and perhaps about twelve million natives.  Both these populations are
    increasing rapidly.  Until both races can see the truth about the
    problem it will remain... As the fear dissolves, so it will be possible
    for Scientology to reach the natives.  There may be a few new things to
    learn here, but if native auditors can be trained in numbers and a
    mass group-auditing technique can be evolved for illiterate people the
    results might be surprising to all.  The next few years will be an
    exciting time in South Africa for any one who wants to see action."

  Again, this view would have been endorsed by Hubbard - not just by allowing
 the article to be published, but in subsequent public and private statements
 expressing his support for racial discrimination and for apartheid policies
 such as forced resettlement.  But from where did Gerry get the idea that
 South African "natives" were somehow un-evolved?  Perhaps unsurprisingly,
 it was Hubbard who set a lead in this regard.  The following statement
 comes from his original 1950 book "Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental
 Health" - written long before he ever visited South Africa - and amazingly,
 can still be found in the latest editions:

    "Primitive societies, being subject to much mauling by the elements,
    have many more occasions for injury than civilized societies.  Further,
    such primitive societies are alive with false data.  Further, their
    practice of medicine and mental healing is on a very aberrative level
    by itself.  The number of engrams in a Zulu would be astonishing.
    Moved out of his restimulative area and taught English he would escape
    the penalty of much of his reactive data; but in his native habitat the
    Zulu is only outside the bars of a madhouse because there are no
    madhouses provided by his tribe.  It is a safe estimate, and one based
    on better experience than is generally available to those who have
    conclusions on "modern man" by studying primitive races, that primitives
    are far more aberrated than civilized peoples.  Their savageness, their
    unprogressiveness, their incidence of illness: all stem from their
    reactive patterns, not from their inherent personalities...  The
    contagion of aberration, being much greater in a primitive tribe, and
    the falsity of the supersitious data in the engrams of such a tribe
    both lead to a conclusion which, observed on the scene, is carried out
    by actuality."

      [Hubbard, "Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health" (1988 ed.),
        book 2, chapter 8, p. 183 - 'The Contagion of Aberration']

 The circle is closed.

--
|              Chris Owen             |           c...@nvg.unit.no            |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
|    WORLD'S BIGGEST SPECTRUM ARCHIVE -- http://www.nvg.unit.no/sinclair    |


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.