Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

why scientologists suck

3 views
Skip to first unread message

jeep93

unread,
Oct 25, 1998, 2:00:00 AM10/25/98
to
Scientologists are Crazy!!!!!!!!!!! Even if you are not a beliver of Jesus.
you wanna believe a third-raten sci-fi writer?

Go watch Star Trek...I only wish Bill Shatner was around to laugh at your
stupid ass...

L. Ron Hubbard....L. Ronning my cock...FREAK!!!!!!!!!!!!

chochi

unread,
Oct 25, 1998, 2:00:00 AM10/25/98
to
what about black Magic ???????????

quoted:
Crowley styled himself "the Beast 666", servant of the Antichrist, and
advocated the use of addictive drugs and bizarre sexual practices.

Jack Parsons was a chemist and an early member of Jet Propulsion
Laboratory in California, but his passion was Magick (as Crowley
respelled the word).

Hubbard and Parsons performed sexual ceremonies to summon a woman
willing to become the mother of "Babalon", the incarnation of evil.

The affair ended with Hubbard running off not only with Parsons' girl
Sara, but also with his money.

Hubbard married Sara Northrup bigamously, and started to write pathetic
letters applying for a war pension. In October 1947, when according to
later accounts he had "cured" himself through Dianetics, Hubbard
admitted to suicidal tendencies and begged for psychiatric help in a
letter to the Veterans
Administration.

Hubbard continued to perform black magic rituals and started to use self
hypnosis, confiding to his notebook such hypnotic affirmations as "all
men are my slaves". His personal papers also make it clear
that he was deliberately pretending war-related ailments so that he
could claim a pension increase.

By this time, Hubbard was already addicted to the barbiturate drugs
originally prescribed for his ulcer. His drug use continued during his
Scientology career, even though he was to sponsor the Scientology
anti-drug group Narconon. Although Dianetics claims to overcome
compulsions with ease, Hubbard was unable to kick the tobacco habit, and
chain-smoked over 80 cigarettes a day.

End Quote

Reference:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Fishman/atack-freedom-trap.html#part8

--
chochi
KoX
Sp3

Lisa Chabot

unread,
Oct 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/26/98
to
In article <efiaho#$9GA.154@upnetnews03>, jeep93 <jee...@msn.com> wrote:
>Go watch Star Trek...I only wish Bill Shatner was around to laugh at your
>stupid ass...

Did I miss something? Did Shatner die? (I've been kinda bummed this
year after Roy, and then Gene, and then Frank* died, so I may not
have been paying attention.) Or does jeep mean only that Shatner
is not reading this newsgroup? Well, he has his own religion
to attend to, so I expect he's busy.


.
. * yankovic, of course
.

--
non-spam can be sent to lsc at this ISP

"What I mean by a shifty eye," continued Miss Marple, "is the kind
that looks very straight at you and never looks away or blinks."

Ben The Allen

unread,
Nov 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/1/98
to
On Sat, 31 Oct 1998 17:57:46, lscdoesntea...@netcom.com (Lisa
Chabot) wrote:

Oh dear...the gibberish the supercede bots are posting is getting
slightly more coherent...and much much more offensive. Dear whoever
thinks (s)he's gaining converts to his lil meme scheme by this, you're
sadly deluded, please knock it off. And for the love of Dog and for
little baby Santa Claus in the manger, _PLEASE_ go out and purchase
one extra-large clue-catching mitt, because you really do need it.

>Thw wiccans I met have always one thing in common.They never run TO Christ but
>have always been a part of a Christian denomination and run AWAY from Christ.
>They were in a Christian religion and felt that they werent getting spiritually
>fulfulled so insetad of looking INWARD to see if THEY may be doing some not
>lining up with what they were taught they dump the responsibility of change
>within themselves and abdicate what may seem harder and run to this stuff which
>is far easier, everyhting goes, seems to have merit andpower and theres little
>accountability.
>In other words, I have never met a wiccan yet who wasnt at one time a Christian
>first , even if a nominal one.
>Wiccans have it easy, its HARD to follow Christ and theres the delineation
>there. The ones who have courage(Christian) and the ones who follow this path
>of darkness with the nah nah nah in your face response to God that is really
>sad.
>They say all kinds of things saying "Look < God hasnt done anything to me yet"
>and get bolder and bolder in their scxoffings and dont realize Satan is sitting
>on the sidelines rubbing his hands together saying " Thats right say what you
>want..I have another sucker now"
>Funny thing again though.
>WHen Wiccans leave this stuff and BECOME Christians? They love the Lord so much
>youll find no better or hard working Christians ever.
>
>Fawn
>

---
Ben Allen,
Of course, it has to be *Kevin's* dead cat to count.
hei...@wport.com
Lame stuff is fun.
remove e and l to e-mail

kashmiri...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Nov 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/4/98
to
In article <efiaho#$9GA.154@upnetnews03>,
"jeep93" <jee...@msn.com> wrote:
> Scientologists are Crazy!!!!!!!!!!!

Blacks are good dancers.
Jews are *thrifty*.
Women want to be dominated.
Men don't know how to change a diaper.
Gypsies only know how to cheat you.
Californians are hypersexed and laid back.
New Yorkers are rude.

What's wrong with all of these statements that is also wrong with
"Scientologists are crazy!"?
--
Kashmir in Your Ear ;)

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Dave Bird

unread,
Nov 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/4/98
to
In<71og5r$976$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, PRICKUPYOUREARS writes:
>In article <efiaho#$9GA.154@upnetnews03>,
> "jeep93" <jee...@msn.com> wrote:
>> Scientologists are Crazy!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>Blacks are good dancers.
>Jews are *thrifty*.
>Women want to be dominated.
>Men don't know how to change a diaper.
>Gypsies only know how to cheat you.
>Californians are hypersexed and laid back.
>New Yorkers are rude.
>
>What's wrong with all of these statements that is also wrong with
>"Scientologists are crazy!"?

Many blacks are not good dancers, never have been or will be,
and are still just as black: being a good dancer is not
integral to being black.

Every Scientologist believes that by clutching two soup cans
sans soup attached to a cheaply made skin resistance meter,
and digging round in their memories, they can have perfect
memory raised IQ and be free from diseases such as athsma;
if they do not, they disbeleive Hubbard's claims and are
not Scientologists. Scientologists, by definition, at least
beleive obviously crazy stuff and act in obviously crazy ways.

What's wrong with being unable to see the difference between the two?

--
' ' ' .:::. ' :: ' ' 'what do Scientologists say when ' http://www.
' (o\ /o) .::. ' you ask why their money-grubbing ' xemu.demon.
' \ " / XEMU ' killed a woman by starvation? ' co.uk '
' '-' :::: ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' :v: \'''| ' BIGOT BIGOT BIGOT '
' ;;\:::/;;\/ / ' OO / / \ ? '
' ;;;;;;;;;BEER ' (~~) .00 @@-._ \ '
' WithAKick\/ ' ( ) ( =) (O ) ( ") (" )
' 'LikeAnHBomb ' ' ' ' ^^^^ ' ' ^^ ^^ ' ' ' ' ^^ ^^ ' ' "" ' ""


Martin O'Brien

unread,
Nov 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/5/98
to
On Wed, 04 Nov 1998 03:03:23 GMT, kashmiri...@my-dejanews.com
wrote:

>In article <efiaho#$9GA.154@upnetnews03>,
> "jeep93" <jee...@msn.com> wrote:
>> Scientologists are Crazy!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>Blacks are good dancers.
>Jews are *thrifty*.
>Women want to be dominated.
>Men don't know how to change a diaper.
>Gypsies only know how to cheat you.
>Californians are hypersexed and laid back.
>New Yorkers are rude.
>
>What's wrong with all of these statements that is also wrong with
>"Scientologists are crazy!"?


Hey! Is this like that Sesame Street thing "one of these things is
different than the others"?

>Blacks are good dancers.
>Jews are *thrifty*.
>Women want to be dominated.
>Men don't know how to change a diaper.
>Gypsies only know how to cheat you.
>Californians are hypersexed and laid back.
>New Yorkers are rude.

These are stereotypes.

>> Scientologists are Crazy!!!!!!!!!!!

This is very true.


Martin O'B

Funky Donny

unread,
Nov 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/5/98
to
In article <71og5r$976$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
kashmiri...@my-dejanews.com writes

>In article <efiaho#$9GA.154@upnetnews03>,
> "jeep93" <jee...@msn.com> wrote:
>> Scientologists are Crazy!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>Blacks are good dancers.
>Jews are *thrifty*.
>Women want to be dominated.
>Men don't know how to change a diaper.
>Gypsies only know how to cheat you.
>Californians are hypersexed and laid back.
>New Yorkers are rude.
>
>What's wrong with all of these statements that is also wrong with
>"Scientologists are crazy!"?

I was a scientologist. While I was a scientologist, it is
fair to say that I was involved in an organization
comprising an almost entirely obsessive-compulsive
membership. Including me. Ask a scientologist what else he
would rather be doing, and he will always say scientology is
no.1 if he tells you the truth. In the 'wog world', we are
not generally so exclusive.

I also suffered from delusional thoughts, evidenced by the
stuff I came out with in session about being a wooly
rhinocerous farmer 180,000 years ago for an alien race who
would harvest rhino and take them back to their planet on
huge banana shaped ships (actual session 'recall').

So, since every pre-clear has a folder similarly full of the
very stuff of delusional psychosis, (let's not forget that
in the R&D volumes Hubbard talks about one in six pre-clears
running the crucifixion as if they were Christ), I don't
think it's a particular generalization to say scientologists
are crazy.

They may be driven to it, and it may be curable in most,
given long enough, but they are completely yip yip snibbit
barking doo-bleeding-lally.

(Notice I used the word 'generalizations' instead of
Hubbard's VERY WRONG 'generalities'. And I can be as ser-
faccy as I like. I'm suppressive. Ha.)
--
Funky Donny

0 new messages