Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Humor vs. Joking & Degrading
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Wolf  
View profile  
 More options May 30 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Wolf <wolft...@micron.net>
Date: 1998/05/30
Subject: Re: Humor vs. Joking & Degrading

WHIPPERSNAPPER wrote:
> It's this *dark* form of humor that is "joking and degrading."  It is
> usually easily recognizable.  Does it add more obscurity, or does it
> enlighten?  Is it a subtle sort of moral or spiritual violence without
> clear intent?  Or does it sweep aside a curtain and show us something --
> something we really knew, didn't we -- all along?

> - Whippersnapper

> "Hey, look what THAT monkey's doing!"  -- Calvin

Well done Whip. While I don't share the exact same feeling of clarity
you do by using Hubbard's *rejection* theory of humor, I still think you
did a good job in general.

As for dark humor being J&D'ing... here I'll disagree. To some extent
all humor is J&D. Be it shaggy dog stories or Henny Youngman one-liners.
Humor points up the rideculous, the pompous, the stupid, the
self-serving and the host of other traits we find easily in others and
disregard in ourselves. I'm fairly sure that's what Hubbard meant by
stating that laughter is 'rejection'. But I don't buy it as anything
even close to an absolute.

Humor is also a mixture of suprise, joy, genuine happiness and even the
process of an exceptionally sharp mind. Where's the rejection in that?

More to the point though, ARS'ers are perfect targets for J&D because
they tend to fall quickly into the patter of condescending humor and
terms that degrade Scn. The nice thing about humor and sarcasm is that
once a person commits themselves to that method of attacking an
opponent, they're wide open for counter-humor. I think anyone still
calling Scn's clams is mere fish bait and are showing more their own
lack of humor and intelligence than any real wit. You'd think if the
ARS-snobs were really bright, they'd have come up with a new joke by
now...

Wolf


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google