JANE SCOTT WRITES TO JOHN ASHCROFT
michael pattinson
M.
***************************************************************************8
Jane Scott
(Personal Information Redacted)
Honorable John Ashcroft
U.S. Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Honorable Attorney General:
I am writing to you in support of the request for information and
immediate action you received earlier this week from California
attorney, Graham E. Berry.
I, personally, have been witness to much of the abuse, both
personal and institutional, about which Mr. Berry has written.
Additionally, I am a former member of the "Church" of Scientology and
my children, friends and I have been victims of "Fair Game", extortion
and exploitation at the "Church's" hands.
Within the past year alone, two of my life-long friends, Patricia
McSweeney of San Rafael, California and Celeste Downey of Las Vegas,
Nevada have received telephone calls from Scientology's chief
"investigator", Eugene Ingram. The purpose of these calls was
apparently to "inform" them about Mr. Berry and based upon this
[mis]information to encourage them to bring pressure to bear upon me
to cease my relationship with and support of him. With particular
regard to Mrs. McSweeney, a 79-year old widow and mother of six, Mr.
Ingram was rude, obnoxious and offensive. When Mrs. McSweeney inquired
of him whether he was working for the Scientology enterprise, he
became even more abusive and refused to answer her; however, Mrs.
McSweeney, was quite conversant with Scientology's modus operendi and
correctly surmised that Ingram was an agent of the Scientologists and
had gotten her phone number from my former husband, a Scientologist.
She abruptly terminated the conversation feeling harrassed, shaken and
outraged.
Additionally, in late January or early February of 2001, two of my
neighbors in the Lucas Valley area of San Rafael, California, where I
had resided for over seventeen years, received packets of information
(Dead Agent Packs) from Elliot Abelson, Esq., just as had a variety of
Mr. Berry's acquaintances and family members including his elderly
parents in New Zealand. (The letters under discussion are identical in
content to the one attached hereto as Exhibit I, and, in fact, my
neighbors' names appear on the cc list) This letter requested
information about Mr. Berry and spread further slanderous allegations
about him. Both of these families had purchased homes on my block
within the preceding twelve months (whereas none of the longer-term
residents received letters from Mr. Abelson) strongly suggesting that
the someone had searched the Marin County title records and based on
what they assumed was greater susceptibility to unfounded slanderous
allegations sent their "black propaganda" only to them. None of these
people had ever met, nor even heard of, Mr. Berry and I cannot imagine
what was the actual purpose of such correspondence by a member of the
State Bar of California. It is of some note that one of the
neighbor-recipients, a California attorney, received his copy at his
law office in San Francisco. It speaks volumes about the basic human
decency of my neighbors that the only result of Abelson's
communication was their unbridled support for and sympathy towards
both Mr. Berry and me.
In advance, please allow me to apologize for the length of the
following narrative, for although it will no doubt seem lengthy and
convoluted to you, it is, in fact, a rather abbreviated version of the
events described.
As I stated previously, I am a former Scientologist and in that
role may be able shed some light on the types of treatment (extortion,
kidnapping, etc.) meted out to this "church's" parishioners. By the
time the events described below occurred, I was no longer willingly
involved in Scientology (my now ex-husband, Steve Archinal, DVM,
[further information about him is provided herewith as Exhibit 2 and
can also be found at
http://www.kpix.com/news/5reports/Pets_&_Vets,_Part_1.html], and I had
left in 1975, although he returned to the waiting, phenomenally
expensive open arms of this cult in 1984), but was, on the advice of
counsel (3 separate lawyers in 3 different California law firms
specializing in family law stated essentially, "If you can possibly
survive, then don't ever engage in a custody battle with someone in a
cult. You can't win. Wait until the youngest child is over 13 and can
determine his own custody before you get a divorce.") attempting to
survive within my marriage until my younger son (then age 8) was old
enough to be an active participant in determining his own custody.
Commencing prior to early in 1991, my husband had begun to completely
undermine my relationship with my then 13-year-old son, Jesse, by
telling him that I had "evil intentions" toward him and that I was, at
the very least, a "suppressive" influence, if not a outright
"Suppressive Person" ("SP") toward him. The Scientology definition of
a "Suppressive Person" is as follows: "A suppressive person is one
that actively seeks to suppress or damage Scientology or a
Scientologist by suppressive acts." [Volunteer Minister's Handbook,
Glossary] The definition of suppressive acts includes the following:
"Suppressive acts are clearly those covert or overt acts knowingly
calculated to reduce or destroy the influence or activities of
Scientology or prevent case gains or continued Scientology success and
activity on the part of a Scientologist…they cannot be granted the
rights normally accorded rational beings," emphasis added [Hubbard, L.
Ron, Introduction to Scientology Ethics, pgs. 223-224, 1989]. It is
also a suppressive act if one is guilty of, "Failure to handle or
disavow and disconnect from a person demonstrably guilty of
suppressive acts." emphasis added (Ibid. p. 209-210). These
Scientology definitions have enormous significance to the way in which
former Scientologists and critics are treated and I shall return to
these issues later. With regard to "suppressive" people, Scientology
"sacred scripture" of 18 October, 1967, on "Penalties for Lower
Conditions," clearly described the merciless persecution of SPs. Under
the ethics condition of "enemy," it states:
"SP Order… Fair game. May be deprived
of property or injured by any means by any
Scientologist without any discipline of the
Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to
or destroyed."
In about January of 1991, Jesse began exhibiting what were clearly the
signs of severe clinical depression. He did such things as: injecting
his face with a syringe full of tap water to mimic insect stings so
that he would not have to attend a class which he was scheduled to
attend and which required an extended trip to the emergency room;
taking a syringe to the tires of my car, during the very late night
hours, so that he would not be forced to attend classes he was
scheduled to attend, because I would be unable to drive him as I had
to get my car fixed. (The air was let out of my tires at least twice,
perhaps three times and I had called the County Sheriff's Office who
had then "staked out" my house in a surveillance vehicle. Needless to
say, the culprit was never caught as he was well aware of the
Sheriff's van parked across the street from our home). Jesse also
exhibited signs of depression by refusing to get up or to get dressed
during the day. He began to overeat dramatically. He did the barest
minimum of schoolwork, watched TV and ate throughout the entire day.
He was intractable and slothful beyond imagination. My husband held me
fully responsible for this because I had always "suppressed" Jesse.
Although it is rather unusual in the United States, both of my
sons were, prior to this time, avid students of ballet. At the time
under discussion, Jesse decided to quit dancing allegedly, according
to his father, because of my "suppression" (irrespective of this
allegation, quitting ballet at around the age of 13 is a rather normal
occurrence for children of both genders). I, however, felt that Jesse
had always intended to quit ballet and had manipulated us. The
preceding June he had, based on his supposedly intense desire to study
for a career in ballet, convinced his father that he needed to pursue
a course of "independent" academic study (i.e., modified home
schooling) rather than returning to seventh grade at his Independent
School, St. Mark's, which he and his father agreed was a "suppressive"
environment. I did not think that there was anything wrong with St.
Mark's and was experiencing full-blown anxiety attacks whenever I
thought about being responsible for the education of such an
intractable, unmotivated adolescent. Once out of a demanding
educational environment, for which he had been provided the ultimate
excuse for failure, i.e. "suppression", Jesse was free to rid himself
of the other time-consuming, demanding activity in his life - ballet
class. I had provided the perfect excuse for Jesse's decision by
allegedly being "suppressive". Thus, Jesse had managed to rid his
life of all demands and drifted into what he thought would be an
adolescent paradise of daylong television and food with no noticeable
responsibilities what so ever.
As my family descended further and further into dysfunctionality,
it became clearer to me that I could do little, if indeed I wished to
protect my younger son from both his father's and Scientology's
malevolent influences. I spoke with Jesse's pediatrician, Dr. Aimy
Taniguchi, about his problems. I tried to explain to her that Jesse
would NEVER be allowed to see either a psychologist or a psychiatrist
as seeing either type of practitioner was against his father's
"religious" beliefs. I felt that this was quite unfortunate as Jesse
was obviously in need of some immediate help.
During the following year, Jesse was in and out of his
"Independent Study" program, then in and out of a private school, Real
School, (selected solely by his father) whose teaching methods were
based on the writings of Scientology's founder L. Ron Hubbard. I was
coerced, by being told that if I did not comply with my husband's
demands that Jesse attend Real School that he would have to be removed
from our home again to get him away from my "suppression". I was then
told that I had to release California Uniform Gift to Minors ("CUGMA")
money to pay for Jesse's tuition for as to not do so was a
"suppressive" act. Prior to this period, Jesse's father moved him out
of our family home because of my "suppression" and used his unimpeded
access to the child to indoctrinate him further into Scientology.
Additionally, his father encouraged Jesse to further ignore his
academic responsibilities as they were "unimportant" when compared to
the value of studying Scientology "scripture".
Jesse's compliance at Real School was virtually no better than it
had been at St. Mark's and he refused to attend to his studies, do his
homework, or in general, to cooperate. Jesse was not invited back to
Real School for the forthcoming academic year. Because Jesse's
behavior was intolerable even by Real School's rather loose standards
we were faced with having to get him to reform himself using the only
means which we were allowed to use - Scientology. To reiterate, this
was a severely depressed adolescent in need of psychiatric
intervention that he could not receive because of his father's
"religious" convictions. It was at this juncture that we became
personally involved in Scientology's institutionally tolerated and
sanctioned abuse.
At this point we heard of an "ethics camp" run by a former Marine,
Wally Hanks, who was a highly trained Scientologist (from my husband's
perspective the only relevant credential!). The program was the
Mace-Kingsley Ranch school in California's Sierra Nevada Mountains
near the town of Grass Valley. (Similar institutions are still, to the
best of my knowledge extant near Palmdale in southern California and
in New Mexico.) This was basically a sort of "tough-love" environment
with the very very expensive veneer of Scientology added to it
(approximately $7,000 for the first month and perhaps something like
$650/week thereafter).
At the end of the '91-'92 academic year we took Jesse up to the
Ranch which consisted of a house where Wally and the girls lived and a
few shack-like out buildings with no heat, running water, sanitary
facilities or electricity.
At the "Ranch" the children were expected to work hard physically
and to learn to master their environment. (I fully believe that this
is why the program worked as well as it did, but the same results
could have been achieved in a much less costly, and much safer setting
run by someone other than Scientologists). On top of the hard
physical work and the deprivations caused by the scarcity of amenities
there was an overlay of "heavy" Scientology "ethics" (this had the
effect of enforcing the group's morality and mentality, and being sent
to ethics is a real and substantial threat!).
What we did not know about when we took our son to Mace-Kingsley
was that Wally Hanks was a pedophile who was engaged in illegal
relations with at least one, or perhaps several, of the girls in his
charge. One weekend when his younger brother and I went up see Jesse
the Ranch it was in obvious turmoil and there appeared to be several
new adults around. Jesse swore us to secrecy and then explained that
one of the girls and her boyfriend had run away because she
"freaked-out" about Wally's sexually molesting her and her not wanting
it to go on anymore. (In a relatively recent incarnation of this story
my son tried explaining that the sex was "consensual". However, the
adults listening to this explained that sex between an approximately
15-year old girl and an approximately 50-year old man was, by
definition, child molestation and a crime for which the adult should
have prosecuted!). As is typical of the Scientology enterprise and its
intense need to control its public image, the perpetrator of the
crime(s), Wally Hanks, was never reported to the civil authorities
although the crime itself was most certainly known to Scientology
authorities, various other "church" members and to the girl's parents.
Jesse celebrated his fourteenth birthday at the Ranch which resulted
in his receiving a "birthday paddling" (with a wooden paddle which
left bruises and rendered Jesse genuinely scared and upset). I did not
hear about this until after he had completed his "program" at the
Ranch.
The Ranch provided a veritable global compendium of questionable
practices and offensives which included, but were not limited to: the
aforementioned child sexual and physical abuse: the casual use and
display of vast numbers of weapons (both the adults and children [all
the latter of whom were there as the result of behavioral and/or
disciplinary problems]) went about carrying loaded firearms
(ostensibly as protection against bear attack); additionally, most of
the children, my own son included were armed with machetes; and almost
as abhorrently, the children were transported on public highways under
incredibly unsafe conditions such as on one occasion ,of which I am
aware, in which the children were loaded in the back of a stake truck
and driven to the Palmdale "campus" a journey of approximately 450
miles. I was unable to speak out for fear that I would permanently
lose my son; his presence in my life denied because if I had spoken
out I would have been "suppressing" Scientology and/or Scientologists
(see definitions above, page 3 para.4 and page 4 paras. 1 & 2).
Jesse returned home in late November or early December of 1992, having
missed approximately 3 months of the academic year. (Although the
children at the Ranch were supposed to be doing school work/attending
school, this never occurred. They were either working as slave labor
on the ranch itself or they were doing Scientology courses or
"auditing" [counseling], but never did they actually do any academic
work or attend any sort of school).
Over my strong protestations that Jesse really needed to remain at
home so that he could begin high school at the appropriate time My
husband and the various minions of the "church" arranged for Jesse to
go to Clearwater, Florida to do a Scientology "course." Records in my
possession demonstrate that on December 15, 1992, $12,600 of Jesse's
CUGMA money was donated to the Scientology enterprise. The entry in
both the check register and the writing on the check are my husband's
although the signature is mine (as the only trustee of this CUGMA
account). My having been physically unable to write the check myself
(something which I, like most adults, do on a near-daily basis) is
clear evidence of the level of coercion to which I was being
subjected. I somehow managed to insist that the only way I would
release the money was for Jesse to finish the eight grade before he
moved to Florida, thus ensuring the validity of my husband's (and
Scientology's) perspective that, while not allowing him to leave
immediately was "suppressive", it was not completely so.
(Scientology's only interest in its parishioners, irrespective of
their representations to the IRS and others, is their money, so they
were appropriately placated by the "donation." I am sure that it was
wholly irrelevant to the Scientology minions whether or not Jesse ever
showed up in Clearwater as long as they had his money in hand).
After Jesse completed this expensive course in Florida, far from his
California home, Scientology and his father insisted that do another
"invaluable" and wildly expensive course which also had to be
completed at the Clearwater facility, thus Jesse was away from home
for more time missing yet more schooling. When this course was
completed my son was finally supposed to be coming home.
Just when Jesse was nearly prepared to come home in the early summer
of 1994, I received a phone call from a Scientology "registrar"
(high-pressure salesman) at the Clearwater facility. I am certain at
this juncture whether this call came from a Scott Chinchar or a person
named Kevin Tighe. I was still asleep when the phone rang, leaving me
a bit dazed and disoriented. The gist of this "conversation" was that
it was necessary for Jesse to be given the funds for the Saint Hill
Special Briefing Course (yet one more amazingly expensive, worthless
Scientology course) right then and that it was far more important for
him to study those materials than it was for him to attend high
school. I begged to differ. I was then, and most significantly, told
that if I were not willing to release the money (CUGMA) that I was
being a suppressive (an SP). The registrar then issued a not-so-veiled
threat and told me that, "You know what happens to suppressive people?
Don't you?"
Well, as a matter of fact I did know! As a former Scientology-trained
counselor and former Scientologist I was quite conversant with the
now-oft-denied Hubbard Communication Office Bulletin of of 18 October,
1967, on "Penalties for Lower Conditions,'"
"SP Order… Fair game. May be deprived
of property or injured by any means by any
Scientologist without any discipline of the
Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to
or destroyed." emphasis added
It was, at that moment, as if sirens, lights, whistles and bells were
going off all around me. I fully realized that not only was my
husband involved in this, but that the only way I would ever get my
not quite 16-year old son Jesse home was to agree to send the money,
in the amount of approximately $12,500. If I were unwilling to be
terrorized and extorted into sending the CUGMA money to Scientology,
then Jesse's father would have given him permission to remain in
Clearwater forever and I am absolutely certain that I would have never
seen or heard from him again.
Not only was I subjected to these institutionally orchestrated
incidents of extortion and terrorism involving my son as well as other
incidents extortion and terrorism far too numerous to delineate
herein, but I was also threatened with being murdered by my husband
who has testified to this under penalty of perjury. (I had told him
that he needed "deprogramming").
I spent 10 years living in daily unrelenting terror. Members of
Scientology's para-military, naval-uniformed Sea Organization ("Sea
Org") were invited to my home by my husband to deal with me ("handle"
me in Scientology's parlance). The first time this happened I left my
then four and eight year old children at home with their clearly
demented father and the Sea Org members (having, [fortunately]
correctly, assumed that such young, sleeping children would be of
little or no interest to the Sea Org members) and disappeared into the
woods near my home where I remained for several freezing hours until
they gave up and left (this was before the advent of cellular phones,
thus I knew that when they were gone there would be no chance of their
returning). The second time this happened, an incident about which I
have had no independent memory, my husband had invited at least one
Sea Org member (male) into my bedroom to "handle" me after I had
retired for the evening.
Unfortunately, I am not the only (former) Scientologist to have been
terrorized and extorted by this "church".
Abuse, terrorism, and extortion are the daily "coin of the realm"
of the Scientology enterprise. Add to this the on-going abuse of
process and corruption/blackmailing of public officials and it is not
difficult to understand why Mr. Berry has referred to the "Church" of
Scientology as "America's Own Taliban"
Like so many others, I am anxiously awaiting the results of your
investigation.
I remain your humble servant,
Jane Scott
Exhibit A is not scanned in and is not included herein
Exhibit B:
http://www.kpix.com/news/5reports/Pets_&_Vets,_Part_1.html
Pets & Vets, Part 1
Channel 5 Investigator Christi O'Connor Investigates
WHEN YOUR FAMILY PET GETS SICK YOU TRUST YOUR
VETERINARIAN TO MAKE HIM WELL. EVERY YEAR IN THE BAY AREA, VETS SAVE
THOUSANDS OF LIVES. BUT DO YOU REALLY KNOW ENOUGH ABOUT YOUR ANIMAL'S
DOCTOR? CHANNEL 5 INVESTIGATOR CHRISTI O'CONNOR HAS AN EYE-OPENING
INVESTIGATION.
EVERY YEAR IN CALIFORNIA ABOUT 500 FAMILIES FILE
OFFICIAL COMPLAINTS CLAIMING THEIR VETERINARIAN MISTREATED, HARMED OR
EVEN KILLED THEIR PET. IT'S THE JOB OF THE STATE VETERINARIAN MEDICAL
BOARD TO DISCIPLINE OFFENDERS AND LET THE PUBLIC KNOW ABOUT THEM. BUT
HERE'S AN EXAMPLE OF CASES YOU'D NEVER KNOW ABOUT IF WE DIDN'T SHOW
YOU.
NAOMI FINERMAN: "A dog is like your child, and you have
them for a span of 15 years. Cleo was our baby."
FOUR YEARS AGO "CLEO" WAS SICK TO HER STOMACH, SO BRIAN
FINERMAN TOOK HER TO DR. STEVE ARCHINAL. THE NEXT MORNING...
NAOMI FINERMAN: "I went in at 9 A-M to pick her up and
there was no Cleo. She died in the night."
NAOMI'S FINERMAN'S REACTION: "Shock. Total shock."
WHAT CAUSED CLEO'S ALLEGED HEART ATTACK?
DR. STEVE ARCHINAL: "She had pancreatitis, it is a
severe recurrent disease."
THE NEXT DAY WHEN THE FINERMENS WENT TO RETRIEVE CLEO'S
BODY...
DR. STEVE ARCHINAL: "I went back to get her and she was
not there."
CLEO WAS GONE. DR. ARCHINAL BLAMES THE PET DISPOSAL
COMPANY FOR ACCIDENTALLY PICKING UP CLEO AND BURYING HER. THE PET
CEMETARY DENIES IT DID. IT EVEN EXHUMED BODIES FROM A MASS GRAVE
TRYING TO MAKE SURE. CLEO WAS NEVER FOUND.
NAOMI FINERMAN: "I was very hysterical."
CHRISTI O'CONNOR: "They're not even sure Cleo ever died.
And they don't know where she is."
DR. STEVE ARCHINAL: "That's what their contention is. I
don't know what to say about that."
BETTY BURR: "He stole my dog."
THIS WOMAN BLAMES DR. ARCHINAL FOR THE GRIEF SHE STILL
FEELS OVER THE LOSS OF HER FAVORITE OF HER FOX TERRIERS. LITTLE DAISY,
WHO WENT TO DR. ARCHINAL WITH A SIMPLE CASE OF DIARRHEA.
FOUR DAYS LATER DR. ARCHINAL TOLD BETTY DAISY HAD A
MASSIVE STROKE AND SHOULD BE PUT TO SLEEP. HE EVEN CHARGED HER FOR THE
EUTHANASIA.
BETTY BURR: "He said he was sooo sorry she had to be
euthanized."
RON WINKLE, BETTY'S BROTHER-IN LAW: "I walked in"
A WEEK LATER BETTY'S BROTHER IN LAW WAS STUNNED WHEN HE
SPOTTED DAISY, ALIVE, AND SITTING ON DR. ARCHINAL'S LAP.
RON WINKLE: "I couldn't believe it. I went home and told
Betty Daisy is alive!"
DR. ARCHINAL SAYS HE MADE A MISTAKE.
CHRISTI O'CONNOR: "So you're admitting you lied to this
woman about her dog being dead. It wasnt dead."
DR. STEVE ARCHINAL: "Yeah. I didnt put her to sleep when
I told her I would. She was so cute."
THE NEXT TIME DR. ARCHINAL SAW BETTY SHE HAD POLICE WITH
HER.
DR. STEVE ARCHINAL: "Police showed up a couple of days
later, wanting to know what If I had this dog. And I said yes."
HE HAD DAISY, BUT SHE WAS DEAD. POLICE FOUND HER IN A
FREEZER, WRAPPED UP IN A WET TOWEL.
CHRISTI O'CONNOR: "What's your response to the claim you
sudenly euthanized her to cover your tracks?
DR. ARCHINAL: "They already knew I had her. how could I
cover my tracks." (sic)
DID DAISY NEED TO DIE? IN A REPORT DR. ARCHINAL WOULD
WRITE NOTHING ABOUT A MASSIVE STROKE HE SAID DAISY HAD, WRITING ONLY
THAT SHE HAD "CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE."
THIS PATHOLOGY REPORT DISPUTES EVEN THAT, FINDING "NO
EVIDENCE OF DISEASE OR ANOMALIES.
SUE GARANEN, VETERINARY MEDICAL BOARD: "We're wondering
why he still has his license."
SUE GARANEN LEADS THE VETERINARIAN MEDICAL BOARD WHICH
CONSIDERED REVOKING DR. ARCHINAL'S LICENSE BUT:
SUE GARANEN: "The enforcement process is such that we
have penalty guidelines. The only one that says we should revoke is
animal cruelty."
SO INSTEAD THE BOARD PUT DR. ARCHINAL ON PROBATION,
ALLOWING HIM TO CONTINUE TO SEE CLIENTS WHO WILL MOST LIKELY NEVER
LEARN ABOUT HIS PAST. ONE FAMILY WHOSE DOG IS STILL MISSING, ANOTHER
WHOSE DOG DIED TWICE, FEELS BETRAYED.
BRIAN FINERMAN: "If this happened to a human you know
that man wouldn't be practicing medicine."
Resources & Information for Pet Owners
Susan
focuses on veterinarians, dentists and chiropractors as major cash
cows, lured into the workings of the cult via management groups. A
good place to start reading about them is www.xenu.net.
Susan
kare...@aol.com (michael pattinson) wrote in message news:<a107a74a.02020...@posting.google.com>...
> activity on the part of a Scientologist…they cannot be granted the
> rights normally accorded rational beings," emphasis added [Hubbard, L.
> Ron, Introduction to Scientology Ethics, pgs. 223-224, 1989]. It is
> also a suppressive act if one is guilty of, "Failure to handle or
> disavow and disconnect from a person demonstrably guilty of
> suppressive acts." emphasis added (Ibid. p. 209-210). These
> Scientology definitions have enormous significance to the way in which
> former Scientologists and critics are treated and I shall return to
> these issues later. With regard to "suppressive" people, Scientology
> "sacred scripture" of 18 October, 1967, on "Penalties for Lower
> Conditions," clearly described the merciless persecution of SPs. Under
> the ethics condition of "enemy," it states:
>
> "SP Order… Fair game. May be deprived
> "SP Order… Fair game. May be deprived
Tilman Hausherr
wrote in <a107a74a.02020...@posting.google.com>:
I'd suggest to make separate reports about these. It is time to close
this children's RPF.
--
Tilman Hausherr [KoX, SP5.55] Entheta * Enturbulation * Entertainment
til...@berlin.snafu.de http://www.xenu.de
Resistance is futile. You will be enturbulated. Xenu always prevails.
Find broken links on your web site: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html
The Xenu bookstore: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/bookstore.html
Michael 'Mike' Gormez - www.taxexemptchildabuse.net
kare...@aol.com (michael pattinson) wrote:
> What we did not know about when we took our son to Mace-Kingsley
>was that Wally Hanks was a pedophile who was engaged in illegal
>relations with at least one, or perhaps several, of the girls in his
>charge.
Can anyone confirm that this is the alleged child molester?
"Captain and humanitarian Wallace Hanks . . . has been involved with
is the creation and development of a highly successful ranch-school
for endangered youth." http://www.roundhouseyachtclub.com/
Endangered indeed!
Mike Gormez
--
Scientology executive protecting child molester
http://members.tripodnet.nl/mgormez/childabuse/childmolester.html
Rev. Fredric L. Rice
>Jane Scott
>(Personal Information Redacted)
Excellent. I'll add that to the Fair Gamed web site.
-- Listen to Scientology's insane "International President" nutter
ranting insanely at http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice
When scientologists are involved it raises the chances of business
fraud by about 100 fold. -- Human Rights activist Mr. Keith Henson
"Commodore Rimjob" available http://www.stationmp3.com/enturbulator
Magoo
"michael pattinson" <kare...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:a107a74a.02020...@posting.google.com...
> rights normally accorded rational beings," emphasis added [Hubbard, L.
> Ron, Introduction to Scientology Ethics, pgs. 223-224, 1989]. It is
> also a suppressive act if one is guilty of, "Failure to handle or
> disavow and disconnect from a person demonstrably guilty of
> suppressive acts." emphasis added (Ibid. p. 209-210). These
> Scientology definitions have enormous significance to the way in which
> former Scientologists and critics are treated and I shall return to
> these issues later. With regard to "suppressive" people, Scientology
> "sacred scripture" of 18 October, 1967, on "Penalties for Lower
> Conditions," clearly described the merciless persecution of SPs. Under
> the ethics condition of "enemy," it states:
>
Magoo
Thank you for sharing all of this!
You may want to add the http://www.lisatrust.net site and mention the
Woodcraft children (now young ladies) speak at some length also of Wally and
the abuses on camera.
My best to you, and your son :)
Tory/Magoo!
"michael pattinson" <kare...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:a107a74a.02020...@posting.google.com...
> activity on the part of a Scientologist.they cannot be granted the
> rights normally accorded rational beings," emphasis added [Hubbard, L.
> Ron, Introduction to Scientology Ethics, pgs. 223-224, 1989]. It is
> also a suppressive act if one is guilty of, "Failure to handle or
> disavow and disconnect from a person demonstrably guilty of
> suppressive acts." emphasis added (Ibid. p. 209-210). These
> Scientology definitions have enormous significance to the way in which
> former Scientologists and critics are treated and I shall return to
> these issues later. With regard to "suppressive" people, Scientology
> "sacred scripture" of 18 October, 1967, on "Penalties for Lower
> Conditions," clearly described the merciless persecution of SPs. Under
> the ethics condition of "enemy," it states:
>
> "SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived
> "SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived