To download these files you need some sort of software to download
torrents.
This one works good:
http://www.utorrent.com/download.php
Digg!
http://digg.com/odd_stuff/ANONYMOUS_Delivers_The_Profit
154 Diggs and counting. It looks like the Scienos have been Digging
this down. Digg it up and get this to the front page.
Also, anyone know the law on Torrents? Can Scientology lawyers get
this removed?
Everyone on Enturbulation.org is talking about getting this downloaded
and then putting up their own seed. I know that's what I'm going to do
and I encourage everyone here to do the same.
______________________
Did you see these videos?
Why won't Scientology allow the release of this movie? Does
Scientology practice free speach or don't they?
no. we did not see these videos. they are ghey and haz no lulz.
for videos get:
By the way - the movie is the real deal - screen shots are coming up
over at Enturb - here's a link, http://forums.enturbulation.org/showpost.php?p=93758&postcount=92
Looks exactly like my copy.
Keith Henson and I were given a copy to submit to the Toronto Film
Festival. Scientology raised such a ruckus and threatened to get any
movie with a ScineoCeleb yanked, it was not considered.
GH SP7
I forgot those. I remember hearing about that at the time. Oh well, perhaps
crow is what's for dinner.
And perhaps someone else has some asplainin' to do. Or perhaps not.
I'll STFU on the subject for the present, which I should have done to begin
with.
Constructional Criticism: If anyone haz a non-vhs copy of better
quality, contact one of the scener groups, like PreVail, Diamond,
Vomit, mVs, etc... I am sure you would find someone willing to proper
it and remove any protections if needed. Just a thought, not that I
would actually advocate anything illegal or anything.
Perhaps.
Does Scientology practice freeze peach or don't they?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> Looks exactly like my copy.
> Keith Henson and I were given a copy to submit to the Toronto Film
> Festival. Scientology raised such a ruckus and threatened to get any
> movie with a ScineoCeleb yanked, it was not considered.
Which I take it means that's not necessarily a digitised version of *your*
copy, just that any copy made in the same way would look like that.
I'd venture to suggest that knowing that the cult wanted the movie buried,
the holders of the original tapes would have been very foolish not to have
made some copies and scattered them around in case of burglary, arson etc.
--
Hartley Patterson
http://www.newsfrombree.co.uk
http://news-from-bree.blogspot.com
It is of course quote possible that you could have a frame-up situation.
/tin foil hat on/
One of the current known holders of the VHS tape gets broken into and the
tape borrowed, copied and put back with out the owner even knowing. Tape
gets released onto the net. Each copy will be unique in forensic terms and
the leaked download will easily be able to be matched with any particular
copy due to the individual analogue discrepancies on each tape (which are
even more obvious the older the tape is). All known holders are suspects and
get raided for copyright infringment, independent forensic comparisons of
all tapes made with the online version and the "leaker" found. This would be
costly but accurate.
/tin foil hat off/
;)
/me noogies henri and throws in a free wedgie...
--
Barb
Chaplain, ARSCC (wdne)
I can haz Legion?
“I think that the protections that we enjoy for freedom of worship exist
so long as we don’t step over the line. When religious worship and
belief cross over into things like fraud, victimization of others and
the disruption of the political arena, that protection is no longer
appropriate.”
--Robert Goff
Professor Emeritus, UCSC