Laura the Lizard: Iam truly sorry...
Eye...@fakeaddress.com
says...
>
>that you turned out to be a cock-sucking whore working for scientology
>department 20.
>
>Tell you mafia uncle to go fuck himself with his threats.
>
>Mintonioni
>
>
Hmmm...this one isn't PGP signed. Troll alert.
-Eyebeam
Bernie
Minton hasn't denied any of the bobm...@cultofscientology.net posts
that has been made under his name, despite the fact that he has been
asked to confirm or deny them several times.
Bob Minton
Zane
Minton) wrote:
>Tell you mafia uncle to go fuck himself with his threats.
Now what Bob? You're getting threats from the mafia? How do you know
it isn't OSA preying on your paranoid delusions?
Zane - KoX, SP4, Club Nine
Free meme innoculations!
tall...@storm.ca
that you turned out to be a deranged, megalomaniac paranoid with skin as thin
as tissue paper.
Take your dead-agent pack, your posturing and your thuglike tactics and fuck
off till you realize what a sad creature you have become.
K
Bob Minton
Oh Kady me dear. By the time we finish our conference call Sunday, you will be
eating out of my hand like a sweet little puppy. So start being nice now
please.
Love and kisses
Bobby
ps Kady like to call me bobby
Zane
Minton) wrote:
>By the time we finish our conference call Sunday, you will be
>eating out of my hand like a sweet little puppy.
ROFLMAO! Now I know for a fact that Bob is deluded. :-)
Bernie
spiral downward ?
Emeril Lagasse who I am sure is a most capable chef is slowly turning
into a clown. That's OK, particularly if he generates good rating for
the network, but it's quite tiresome when he clogs up the channel for
3-4 hours per day. Besides at the pace he's going, he'll be yesterday's
news in a year or two (on TV at least).
Pressure Cooker is a joke. A poorly conceived and poorly executed
attempt at cooking entertainment. Ready-Set-Cook was bad enough, but
Pressure Cooker almost seems a deliberate attempt at producing garbage
programming.
Why can't TVFN sprinkle in a few "quality" cooking shows from time to
time ? Is that the proprietary domain of PBS ? I would love to see
even a half hour a day of something like "Cooking at the Academy" which
was produced by the CCA, or perhaps something from someone like Jacque
Pepin, or Martin Yan. I'd best stick to PBS I suppose.
Does this type of programming cost too much for TVFN to air, or am I
overestimating the taste/intellegence of the majority of TVFN's viewers
? I don't believe I am, but I believe TVFN is indeed targeting an
audience that may or may not exist.
In defense of TVFN, I do enjoy watching Taste, Michael Lomonaco, and The
Two Fat Ladies. It simply seems they could do a better overall job.
While I have no facts supporting this next point, TVFN would do well to
move to Los Angeles. Something about New York and producing television,
akin to mixing oil and water...
Andreas Heldal-Lund - www.xenu.net
The.Galacti...@ThePentagon.com (ŠAnti-CultŽ) wrote:
>Bob, just a short notice: Factnet needs an official spokes/PR person.
>Neither you, Stacy or Jesse should be involved in that.
>
>Someone needs to sort the information that should go to a.r.s, or any
>other public area.
>
>Please deal with that.
This sounds like a very good suggestion. Now I'm sometimes
unsure what is Factnets official opinion and what is personal.
An official spokesperson would maybe remove some of the
misunderstandings?
Best wishes, SP4 & Adm. TOXE CXI
Andreas Heldal-Lund, Normannsgaten 9, N-4013 Stavanger, Norway
Pho: +47 88 00 66 66 Fax: 90 32 35 46 E-mail: hel...@online.no
home.sol.no/~spirous www.xenu.net www.hedning.no/hedning
---------------------------------------------------------------
"The great snare of thought is uncritical acceptance of
irrational assumptions." - Will Durant
---------------------------------------------------------------
Bernie
Nick Andrew
>On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 01:11:56 GMT, bobm...@cultofscientology.net (Bob
>Minton) wrote:
>>Tell you mafia uncle to go fuck himself with his threats.
>Now what Bob? You're getting threats from the mafia? How do you know
>it isn't OSA preying on your paranoid delusions?
Relax, it wasn't bob - it was a troll.
Nick.
--
Zeta Internet SP4 Fax: +61-2-9233-6545 Voice: 9231-9400
G.P.O. Box 3400, Sydney NSW 1043 http://www.zeta.org.au/
mad_b...@my-dejanews.com
> department 20.
>
>
>
Is it just me, or does this sound like something scarff might write?
Mad_Cow
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Rebecca Hartong
Bob Minton wrote in message <36a7cf7...@news.newsguy.com>...
>that you turned out to be a cock-sucking whore working for scientology
>department 20.
>
>Tell you mafia uncle to go fuck himself with his threats.
Another unsubstantiated accusation. What the hell, eh? Why not? Hey! I
bet she's microwave thought-control machines installed in all the light
fixtures at your house, too, Bob! Watch out for those, man... make
yourself an aluminum foil helmet. It's the only protection.
BTW, a "terrapin" is a kind of TURTLE. Not a lizard. I think I saw someone
referring to reptiles in another post. Turtles are amphibians, not
reptiles.
Rebecca Hartong
Bob Minton wrote in message <36a7cf7...@news.newsguy.com>...
>Tell you mafia uncle to go fuck himself with his threats.
And another thing...
So, you're confirming that Laura Terepin has a Mafia uncle? If this is
true, doesn't it shoot a few holes in some of your circumstantial evidence?
After all, if she really DOES have a rich Mafia uncle, then she would have
ample reason being a bit paranoid herself. She really WOULD have enough
money to spend most of her time doing volunteer work.
Mark Styles
>>department 20.
>>
>
Umm, would Bob really sign his posts with 'Mintonioni'?
I don't think I'll accept any Minton posts which aren't PGP signed.
Mark.
Religious tolerance is an oxymoron.
http://www.lambic.co.uk
Rob Clark
>BTW, a "terrapin" is a kind of TURTLE. Not a lizard. I think I saw someone
>referring to reptiles in another post. Turtles are amphibians, not
>reptiles.
no, turtles are reptiles.
rob
tall...@storm.ca
>On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 01:56:55 GMT, tall...@storm.ca (tall...@storm.ca) wrote:
>
>>as tissue paper.
>>
>>Take your dead-agent pack, your posturing and your thuglike tactics and fuck
>>off till you realize what a sad creature you have become.
>>
>eating out of my hand like a sweet little puppy.
All I can say to this, Bob, is that you'd better have some cold, hard evidence
in your hands, or by the time we finish discussing this, you'll have nothing
but bloody stumps.
But you know what? I've reconsidered. I didn't *want* a cosy little conference
call between you, me and Mirele. I wanted a calm, controlled *public*
discussion. You made your accusations in public, and I think you should back
them up in public.
So here's the deal. On Sunday night, I will set up a separate IRC channel,
#mintonchat. It will be open to all, but it will be moderated by a calm, cool,
collected person -- ie, not me :). (Jim Lippard, if you're reading this: are
you interested?)
Questions will be asked on the subject of Laura, but it will not be a gang
bang. Anyone is free to join, but questions will be controlled by the
moderator.
That's my offer. The previous deal is off the table. Are you game?
So start being nice now
>please.
As nice to you as you have been to Laura this past week?
>Love and kisses
>
>Bobby
>
>ps Kady like to call me bobby
K
who has other names for Minton at the moment
Ishmael
}that you turned out to be a cock-sucking whore working for scientology
}department 20.
}
}Tell you mafia uncle to go fuck himself with his threats.
A true mafia uncle would be more inclined to put a bullet behind the ear
of his niece's OSA handler than to threaten Bob. A real wise guy would
despise anyone who would suborn a family member to become a spy for an
anti-catholic cult. The genuine article would be more inclined to
contact Bob to apologize for the all trouble; get the details regarding
who, what, when and where and assure Bob that the matter would be
handled quietly. I can't elaborate on why I know this, let's just say
that... Well, let's not.
Now it's possible that Laura has convinced her dear zio that she is
being falsely accused--blood is thicker than water. If this is the case
I can only urge the uncle to get all the facts before issuing final
instructions to his contractor. To Laura's zio I say: make sure the
right guy will sleep with the fishes.
}Mintonioni
It's customary for an inductee to a Family to be given a nickname as a
term of endearment and a means to identify some outstanding
characteristic or aspect of the person. I propose, Bobby "The Stick" to
commemorate his altercation with Frank Ofman. Changing your name to
Mintonioni will require special approval, but it's got a nice ring to it
:)
Ishmael
**************** Meet me in Clearwater, December 5th, 1999. ****************
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Doubts of all things earthly, and intuitions of some things heavenly; this
combination makes neither believer nor infidel, but makes a man who regards
them both with equal eye.--Herman Melville
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.offlines.org/my_essay.html
Zane
<har...@erols.com> wrote:
>And another thing...
>So, you're confirming that Laura Terepin has a Mafia uncle?
Doh! You're right.
That was one of Jesse's big things, Laura's reportedly incredible
story of a wealthy uncle.
However, I find it a bit hard to believe that some mafia dude would
call Minton up and threaten him. It was probably OSA or some
malicious critic fucking with his head. As usual, in the abscence of
anything resembling objective information, we can speculate endlessly
reaching all sorts of "likely" conclusions.
William Barwell
Zane <z_thomas#ars#@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 07:00:22 GMT, bobm...@cultofscientology.net (Bob
>Minton) wrote:
>
>>By the time we finish our conference call Sunday, you will be
>>eating out of my hand like a sweet little puppy.
>
>
Not that that is necessarily bad in and of itself.
If done properly, which I am not sure it is.
Pope Charles
SubGenius Pope Of Houston
Slack!
Bob Minton
>In article <36a8216...@news.newsguy.com>, bobm...@cultofscientology.net (Bob Minton) wrote:
>>On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 01:56:55 GMT, tall...@storm.ca (tall...@storm.ca) wrote:
>>
>>>In article <36a7cf7...@news.newsguy.com>, bobm...@cultofscientology.net
>>
>>>(Bob Minton) wrote
>>>
>>>that you turned out to be a deranged, megalomaniac paranoid with skin as thin
>>>as tissue paper.
>>>
>>>Take your dead-agent pack, your posturing and your thuglike tactics and fuck
>>>off till you realize what a sad creature you have become.
>>>
>>Oh Kady me dear. By the time we finish our conference call Sunday, you will be
>>eating out of my hand like a sweet little puppy.
>
>All I can say to this, Bob, is that you'd better have some cold, hard evidence
>in your hands, or by the time we finish discussing this, you'll have nothing
>but bloody stumps.
I've got something hard in my hands. Problem is like I told you before, you
can't see it. ;-)
>But you know what? I've reconsidered.
I thought you'd chicken out wimp!
>I didn't *want* a cosy little conference
>call between you, me and Mirele.
Then why did you agree to one Babe?
>I wanted a calm, controlled *public*
>discussion. You made your accusations in public, and I think you should back
>them up in public.
I've been in your IRC sec-checks already Sugar.
>
>So here's the deal. On Sunday night, I will set up a separate IRC channel,
>#mintonchat. It will be open to all, but it will be moderated by a calm, cool,
>collected person -- ie, not me :).
I'll do it when Stacy and I are next together because she can type. BUT Kady
darling since you picked the forum, I'll pick the cool calm moderator.
>(Jim Lippard, if you're reading this: are >you interested?)
>Questions will be asked on the subject of Laura, but it will not be a gang
>bang. Anyone is free to join, but questions will be controlled by the
>moderator.
>
>That's my offer. The previous deal is off the table. Are you game?
>
You got my response. But Stacy and I will get together Feb 1 or 2. By then you
will be eating out of my hands anyway, I will have already accepted your
apology about the slut Laura, and we'll just talk about recepies for BBQ BT's,
cluster soup, thetan hand spam, anti-christ pasta, ot2 oxtail stew and ot8-dead
on the plate.
Got it chickee? If you don't like my deal Kady let's just wrestle. Does that
work for you? A tag team deal--you and Deana vs Jesse and Bob at my place in
the mud. You game darlings? The winners can run for governor ;-)
>So start being nice now
>>please.
>
>
>As nice to you as you have been to Laura this past week?
>
>
>>Love and kisses
>>
>>Bobby
>>
>>ps Kady like to call me bobby
>
>K
>
>who has other names for Minton at the moment
Bobby Minton
The guy Kady loves to hate.
Rebecca Hartong
tall...@storm.ca wrote in message <78a79k$11s...@enews.newsguy.com>...
>But you know what? I've reconsidered. I didn't *want* a cosy little
conference
>call between you, me and Mirele. I wanted a calm, controlled *public*
>discussion. You made your accusations in public, and I think you should
back
>them up in public.
What is it with people wanting to chat privately on the telephone regarding
disputes that have developed on a.r.s.? I've received a couple of
invitations to do this and have turned them both down.
>So here's the deal. On Sunday night, I will set up a separate IRC channel,
>#mintonchat. It will be open to all, but it will be moderated by a calm,
cool,
>collected person -- ie, not me :). (Jim Lippard, if you're reading this:
are
>you interested?)
This is a good idea, Kady. Do you think it would be possible to come to an
advance agreement that the logs of this IRC discussion will be posted to
a.r.s. for the benefit of those of us who may not be available on Sunday
night?
Rebecca Hartong
Ishmael wrote in message <78a7en$d...@news3.newsguy.com>...
>A true mafia uncle would be more inclined to put a bullet behind the ear
>of his niece's OSA handler than to threaten Bob. A real wise guy would
>despise anyone who would suborn a family member to become a spy for an
>anti-catholic cult. The genuine article would be more inclined to
>contact Bob to apologize for the all trouble; get the details regarding
>who, what, when and where and assure Bob that the matter would be
>handled quietly. I can't elaborate on why I know this, let's just say
>that... Well, let's not.
I understand.
I'm embarrassed to actually own a copy of the movie Godfather III, too.
Rebecca Hartong
Rebecca Hartong wrote in message <789qla$l...@enews4.newsguy.com>...
>BTW, a "terrapin" is a kind of TURTLE. Not a lizard. I think I saw
someone
>referring to reptiles in another post. Turtles are amphibians, not
>reptiles.
I was wrong about turtles being amphibians. They are, indeed, reptiles.
Sorry for the misinformation! At any rate, at least I was right about
terrapins not being lizards. ;-)
James J. Lippard
tall...@storm.ca <tall...@storm.ca> wrote:
>So here's the deal. On Sunday night, I will set up a separate IRC channel,
>#mintonchat. It will be open to all, but it will be moderated by a calm, cool,
>collected person -- ie, not me :). (Jim Lippard, if you're reading this: are
>you interested?)
I would be, but I already have other commitments Sunday afternoon and
evening. I would like to see what the results are.
--
Jim Lippard lippard@(primenet.com discord.org ediacara.org)
Phoenix, Arizona http://www.primenet.com/~lippard/
PGP Fingerprint: B130 7BE1 18C1 AA4C 4D51 388F 6E6D 2C7A 36D3 CB4F
Ron Newman
<har...@erols.com> wrote:
> tall...@storm.ca wrote in message <78a79k$11s...@enews.newsguy.com>...
> >So here's the deal. On Sunday night, I will set up a separate IRC channel,
> >#mintonchat. It will be open to all, but it will be moderated by a calm,
> cool,
> >collected person -- ie, not me :). (Jim Lippard, if you're reading this:
> are
> >you interested?)
>
>
> This is a good idea, Kady. Do you think it would be possible to come to an
> advance agreement that the logs of this IRC discussion will be posted to
> a.r.s. for the benefit of those of us who may not be available on Sunday
> night?
That's my preference and I think it's Kady's as well, from the discussion
I had with her earlier today.
--
Ron Newman rne...@thecia.net
http://www2.thecia.net/users/rnewman/
David Brower
>What is it with people wanting to chat privately on the telephone regarding
>disputes that have developed on a.r.s.? I've received a couple of
>invitations to do this and have turned them both down.
Why have you turned them down?
It seems to me that e-discussion tends towards limits of rhetorical
excess and over-inflamed language that often does not help reach
understanding and accomodation. there's something to be said for
actually hearing and seeig people you are communicating with at times.
IMHO, I wouldn't hurt for Mr. Minton to go fly to see Ms. Kisser, have
a frank and open meeting with each other, and to issue a brief joint
statement afterwards that need not go into details.
-dB
Unknown
I grew up in the heart of Mafiosa country. Ishmael is probably
correct. I seriously doubt that Laura's Uncle would do this unless he
is not really mafia or just a flunky who knows some mafia. These guys
would not fool with this shit. There is nothing for them to gain by
it. It could only bring them grief. Any way, haven't you heard?
Mafia keeps a very low profile these days. They are just about out of
business and can't afford legal problems anymore. The Teflon God is
gone tho not forgotten. And no, I do not own a copy of Godfather III
or any other Godfather movies. I just grew up amidst this stuff and
have a sense of how they operate. Phone calls are not one of their
things. If Minton turns up beaten to a pulp I will believe the Mafia
got involved till then I go with the above.
I suspect OSA of this alleged phone call.
roxthefox1
>
>
>
>
>
When the chips are down the buffalo move on.
Zane
wrote:
>I will have already accepted your apology about the slut Laura
You're wrong Bob, you will never get an apology from me about Laura,
and I doubt you'll get one from Kady. The reason is that it is never
incorrect to challenge accusations directed against someone without
any supporting tangible evidence. Since I (and Kady) have not acted
incorrectly we have no need to apologize.
I look forward to your apology for your assuming that you should be
held above other people and allowed to say whatever you like without
evidence.
tall...@idirect.com
In article <36a8bb13...@nntp.ix.netcom.com>, rsmi...@ix.netcom.com (Bob
Minton) wrote:
>>All I can say to this, Bob, is that you'd better have some cold, hard evidence
>
>>in your hands, or by the time we finish discussing this, you'll have nothing
>>but bloody stumps.
>
>I've got something hard in my hands. Problem is like I told you before, you
>can't see it. ;-)
Then for heaven's sakes, stop talking about it.
>>But you know what? I've reconsidered.
>
>I thought you'd chicken out wimp!
No, I just think that, given your attitude towards it, it would be cheaper to
save you the long distance charges.
I'm not speaking for Mirele, by the way. She may be willing to talk to you. I
just don't see the point. I'm not interested in any 'evidence' you can't
discuss in public. I'm not interested in being 'handled'. I want an open,
honest, discussion.
>>I didn't *want* a cosy little conference
>>call between you, me and Mirele.
>
>Then why did you agree to one Babe?
To be honest, because you trapped me into it. I didn't want to appear
unreasonable, and at the time, I held out a mad hope that you were actually
willing to treat this as a serious issue worthy of calm, considered debate.
Apparently, that was ill-founded. You saw it as just a way to 'handle' Mirele
and I into piping down and leaving you to continue your attacks on this woman
without any demands for such niceties as evidence beyond your say-so. That was
never my intention.
>>I wanted a calm, controlled *public*
>>discussion. You made your accusations in public, and I think you should back
>>them up in public.
>
>I've been in your IRC sec-checks already Sugar.
As I stated, this will be a controlled discussion. However, there are a lot of
people with questions about the veracity of your claims, and misgivings about
the way you have gone about launching your attack. This won't be a love-in,
but it won't be a gang-bang. That's as good as it gets on a.r.s./#scn.
>>So here's the deal. On Sunday night, I will set up a separate IRC channel,
>>#mintonchat. It will be open to all, but it will be moderated by a calm, cool,
>
>>collected person -- ie, not me :).
>
>I'll do it when Stacy and I are next together because she can type. BUT Kady
>darling since you picked the forum, I'll pick the cool calm moderator.
You can suggest a moderator right here. I'm sure there is a calm, relatively
neutral, IRC-familiar third party on whom we can both agree.
>You got my response. But Stacy and I will get together Feb 1 or 2. By then you
>will be eating out of my hands anyway, I will have already accepted your
>apology about the slut Laura, and we'll just talk about recepies for BBQ BT's,
>cluster soup, thetan hand spam, anti-christ pasta, ot2 oxtail stew and ot8-dead
>on the plate.
You can make whatever postulates you wish. But frankly, I don't think it helps
your case to have such apparent contempt for the thinking skills and
judgements of anyone who is sceptical of your claims.
>Got it chickee? If you don't like my deal Kady let's just wrestle. Does that
>work for you? A tag team deal--you and Deana vs Jesse and Bob at my place in
>the mud. You game darlings? The winners can run for governor ;-)
Why does this remind me of that old saying about the foolishness of wrestling
a pig?
So, who do you propose should moderate this discussion?
K
tall...@idirect.com
>In article <78acmc$2...@enews3.newsguy.com>, "Rebecca Hartong"
><har...@erols.com> wrote:
>
>> tall...@storm.ca wrote in message <78a79k$11s...@enews.newsguy.com>...
>
>> >#mintonchat. It will be open to all, but it will be moderated by a calm,
>> cool,
>> are
>> >you interested?)
>>
>>
>> This is a good idea, Kady. Do you think it would be possible to come to an
>> advance agreement that the logs of this IRC discussion will be posted to
>> a.r.s. for the benefit of those of us who may not be available on Sunday
>> night?
>
>That's my preference and I think it's Kady's as well, from the discussion
>I had with her earlier today.
Yes, I think logs posted to a.r.s. would be a good thing. This is meant to be
as public a discussion as possible.
K
Rebecca Hartong
mousse might do the trick.
Look up "aphrodisiac foods" or something similar via a search engine.
Good Luck
J
Bob Minton
wrote:
>>>So here's the deal. On Sunday night, I will set up a separate IRC channel,
>>>#mintonchat. It will be open to all, but it will be moderated by a calm, cool,
>>
>>>collected person -- ie, not me :).
>>
>>I'll do it when Stacy and I are next together because she can type. BUT Kady
>>darling since you picked the forum, I'll pick the cool calm moderator.
>
>You can suggest a moderator right here. I'm sure there is a calm, relatively
>neutral, IRC-familiar third party on whom we can both agree.
>
>
>>You got my response. But Stacy and I will get together Feb 1 or 2. By then you
>>will be eating out of my hands anyway, I will have already accepted your
>>apology about the slut Laura, and we'll just talk about recepies for BBQ BT's,
>>cluster soup, thetan hand spam, anti-christ pasta, ot2 oxtail stew and ot8-dead
>>on the plate.
>
>You can make whatever postulates you wish. But frankly, I don't think it helps
>your case to have such apparent contempt for the thinking skills and
>judgements of anyone who is sceptical of your claims.
>
>>Got it chickee? If you don't like my deal Kady let's just wrestle. Does that
>>work for you? A tag team deal--you and Deana vs Jesse and Bob at my place in
>>the mud. You game darlings? The winners can run for governor ;-)
>
>Why does this remind me of that old saying about the foolishness of wrestling
>a pig?
>
>So, who do you propose should moderate this discussion?
>
>K
I'll talk to moderators in Florida next week and let you know. I'll also talk to
a syndicated radio show to see if they will broadcast a conference call on the
radio and the internet.
Bob Minton
Oxford Systems
>department 20.
>
>Tell you mafia uncle to go fuck himself with his threats.
>
This post and several responses are obvious forgeries designed to wreak
havoc on A.R.S.
Ignore them.
They will go away.
Cat O'Blivion
> I've got something hard in my hands. Problem is like I told you before, you
> can't see it. ;-)
What a mature and rational way to respond to the well-
founded criticism of the fact that no one outside your
inner circle will be permitted to see this "evidence".
Not.
You should have just gone ahead and typed "Neener neener"
after your last sentence, Bob. It would have made no
difference as to the tone of your message.
<snip>
> Then why did you agree to one Babe?
Babe, sugar, dear, darlings, chickee. You know Bob, Kady
might like you better if you could talk to her as one mature
adult to another, rather than talking down to her as though
she were some adorable but disobedient child. This isn't the
first time I've noticed you slip into patronizing patriarch
mode when confronted with a female critic who disagrees with
you, either. You might want to reconsider that tactic - it has
the unfortunate effect of making you look as though you have a
tiny problem with women, particularly intelligent and outspoken
women.
And it makes your protestations about not using 'whore' against
LT in any kind of a sexist way seem all the more hollow. As
does this:
> I will have already accepted your apology about the slut Laura
Do you still care to deny that you are attempting to be sexist
and offensive?
Cat
SP4, KoX
--
Stop the Spam on alt.religion.scientology - http://www.xenu.net
"I dare you, to be real, to touch a flickering flame..."
- Bauhaus -
Rebecca Hartong
Dave Bird
>On Fri, 22 Jan bobm...@cultofscientology.net (BobMinton) wrote:
>>
>>By the time we finish our conference call Sunday, you will be
>>eating out of my hand like a sweet little puppy.
>
You mean, even if the evidence is produced, she will continue
to be obnoxious anyway?
|~/ |~/
~~|;'^';-._.-;'^';-._.-;'^';-._.-;'^';-._.-;||';-._.-;'^';||_.-;'^'0-|~~
P | Woof Woof, Glug Glug ||____________|| 0 | P
O | Who Drowned the Judge's Dog? | . . . . . . . '----. 0 | O
O | answers on *---|_______________ @__o0 | O
L |{a href="news:alt.religion.scientology"}{/a}_____________|/_______| L
and{a href="http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/clam/lynx/q0.html"}{/a}XemuSP4(:)
Tilman Hausherr
another Laura who is "innocent"? This would have avoided her some
trouble.
--
Tilman Hausherr [KoX, SP4]
til...@berlin.snafu.de http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/#cos
Resistance is futile. You will be enturbulated. Xenu always prevails.
Clearwater pictures: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Oracle/4497/clearwater/index.html
Find broken links on your web site: http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/xenulink.html
Annoy scientology by buying books: http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/bookstore.html
Fast
It will take more than that lame attempt to "wreak havoc" on ars, IMO.
- Fast
Zane
<oxford...@usa.net> wrote:
>This post and several responses are obvious forgeries designed to wreak
>havoc on A.R.S.
Really? How do you know? Why hasn't bob repudiated the posts you
think are forgeries? He didn't deny them on irc lastnight.
Rebecca Hartong
David Brower wrote in message ...
>"Rebecca Hartong" <har...@erols.com> writes:
>
>>What is it with people wanting to chat privately on the telephone
regarding
>>disputes that have developed on a.r.s.? I've received a couple of
>>invitations to do this and have turned them both down.
>
>Why have you turned them down?
Because I believe that the social niceties generally required of voice
communication can tend to obscure the facts.
>It seems to me that e-discussion tends towards limits of rhetorical
>excess and over-inflamed language that often does not help reach
>understanding and accomodation.
I disagree. I think that anyone who is unable to glean the actual issues
from the flames in e-discussion is probably even less likely to be able to
stick to the issues in voice communication.
>there's something to be said for
>actually hearing and seeig people you are communicating with at times.
Sometimes. I don't believe discussions on a.r.s. are among those times,
though.
>IMHO, I wouldn't hurt for Mr. Minton to go fly to see Ms. Kisser, have
>a frank and open meeting with each other, and to issue a brief joint
>statement afterwards that need not go into details.
I have no doubt he'd be charming.
That can be a problem.
Andreas Heldal-Lund - www.xenu.net
The complete works of the Gaon of Avon are brought to you in one beautiful
imitation-leather bound volume.
"All that glisters ..."
Printed on shiny white paper with a little gold leaf on the edges, no family
can afford to miss the Launcelot Gobbo Edition printed in memory of "my old
master the Jew zal"
"Gifts of rich value, yet I have not seen"
Never before have the Histories, Tragedies, Comedies and Sonnets been
arranged with such attention to the classic style and the modern reader.
The ArtScroll Shakespeare combines the original texts with the ommentaries
of the classical meforshim. Annotations and footnotes will help both the
scholar and relative newcomer develop chochma and ahavos Shakespeare. Stage
directions by the leading poskim are incorporated into the texts with a full
reference section at the back, based on the Sheilos and Tshuvos of the
Yorick zal.
The ArtScroll Shakespeare is complete with diagrams, charts and pictures. An
extended essay section shows how to refute the claims of the scoffers, may
the witches' curse be upon them, that the works were not the revelation of
one man or that the Midsummernacht Nevuoh is to be understood in a purely
allegorical sense, chos ve'sholom.
The ArtScroll Shakespeare will be released this Purim iy"h with its
companion volume from Our Famous Lives Series "The Iluiy of Avon", which
tells how William ben Chaim Shakespeare mastered Iambic Pentameters by the
age of three and had written his first sonnets by the age of five.
Make your bookshelves complete. No Bar Mitzvah should be without it.
Author: Unknown
Source: Jewish Humor Mailing List
Andreas Heldal-Lund - www.xenu.net
Ron Newman
>My father worked for Lear Jet years ago, I remember him telling me that Mr.
>Lear had named his daughter Chanda!
>
> - Nettie
>
Now, THATS a real shame!
Keith Henson
>Look at my original proposal; I was proposing self-governing haredi
>reservations exempt from Israeli taxes. Also, in the next generation,
seculars
>will be the majority; leaving out the baal tshuva movement; >>
Where do you get this from? I thought the birthrates were going in the
opposite direction?
each generation
>moves further and further from religious observance. >>
I don't think so. Most Israelis strike me as "traditional."
If anything, I expect a
>new Israeli movement similar to Jewish Renewal/Reconstructionism in the
US.>>
I hope so, but that would prove my traditional point.
DC
NYC
Ron Newman
Ron Newman
Keith Henson
Rebecca Hartong
>That's like the Chinese guy who had a big sign on his
storefront:
>"Yankel Goldberg's Chinese Laundry." So a customer came in
and asked
>for Yankel Goldberg. The Chinese guy said, "I'm Yankel
Goldberg." The
>customer said, "How did you ever get that name?!" The
Chinese guy said,
>"Was in immigration line behind guy named Yankel Goldberg.
They asked
>him his name and he told them. Then when they asked me my
name, I said,
>'Sam Ting'."
>
there is a nobel prize winner at mit, whose name is.....sam
ting
Rebecca Hartong
tall...@idirect.com
The All Jewish Torah Discussion Board
http://www.jewishchicago.com/torah/board.html
This is a place on the Internet where all Jews who are interested in the
study of Torah are welcome. Reform, Conservative, Reconstructionist,
Conservadox, Orthodox, frum, Satmer, Breslov, and Chabad Jews, lets all come
together! Please voice a nice Divar Torah, a question or an answer. Let's
learn from each other!
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Keith Henson
: By the way - when first outing Laura, why didn't you say that there is
: another Laura who is "innocent"? This would have avoided her some
: trouble.
Easy, Bob and his PIs had no idea the listed one was related to this
business at all. They didn't even know she read a.r.s. The possibility
of identity transfer didn't occur to them either. Big surprise all the
way around. Keith Henson
: --
Boudewijn van Ingen
>I'll talk to moderators in Florida next week and let you know. I'll also talk to
>a syndicated radio show to see if they will broadcast a conference call on the
>radio and the internet.
>
>Bob Minton
Bob, why don't you address the issue?
Groeten,
Boudewijn, Kox.
"I guarantee you that isn't true," said Mike Rinder, a top official for Scientology
Zenon Panoussis
Tilman Hausherr skrev:
>
> By the way - when first outing Laura, why didn't you say that there is
> another Laura who is "innocent"? This would have avoided her some
> trouble.
I don't think anybody knew at the time. I think Keith
was the first one to post about her after she contacted
him, after all the shit had hit the fan.
Z
--
oracle@everywhere: The ephemeral source of the eternal truth...
Boudewijn van Ingen
wrote:
>Tilman Hausherr <til...@berlin.snafu.de> wrote:
>: By the way - when first outing Laura, why didn't you say that there is
>: another Laura who is "innocent"? This would have avoided her some
>: trouble.
>
>Easy, Bob and his PIs had no idea the listed one was related to this
>business at all. They didn't even know she read a.r.s. The possibility
>of identity transfer didn't occur to them either. Big surprise all the
>way around. Keith Henson
That must have been a *very* sloppy PI, then. A simple search on the
'net ignored. Makes me wonder what he actually *did* for his money.
Keith Henson
>Wondering how this name evolved and how Peeky Toe crab is different from
>king,snow, lump or claw crab?
>
>Have a great recipe for Napoleon of Peeky Toe crab and apples...my local
>seafood store stocks lots of crab meat, but no peeky toe....
>
>I am sure lump crab can be substituted, but there is a vast taste difference
>between snow and king crab, with king crab being the finest by far.
>
>I know the Chesapeake Bay blue crab enthusiasts will be flaming me, but who
>cares. I still prefer King crab over all others for taste.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Barb
>Orlando, FL
>
I'm curious too and hope someone answers your question. I'm wondering if it's
supposed to be Pinky Toe instead of Peeky Toe? I've noticed a definite taste
difference to the tiny piece of crab meat in the smallest part of the crab
claw. It's a long skinny piece that's hard to get out. It's my absolute fav
part of a crab with the exception of excellent mustard!!! God, I love steamed
crabs. Better than sex, I always say...
Ruth(from east Pa and who buys steamed crabs at every opportunity)
Boudewijn van Ingen
Tilman Hausherr
wrote:
>Easy, Bob and his PIs had no idea the listed one was related to this
>business at all. They didn't even know she read a.r.s. The possibility
>of identity transfer didn't occur to them either. Big surprise all the
>way around. Keith Henson
Bob told a different story on irc (at least it seems so to me), that
they knew about her but dropped that once they know she wasn't the one.
I could post the two lines from the irc logs.
Tilman
Bob Minton
>> >>> Sweet Malo, you're hurting inside,
>> >>> Thats why I want to be your bride.
>> >>> I could soothe all those hurts;
>> >>> Those curts and those furts,
>> >>> And hold you whenever you cried.
>> >>
>> >>well daizy im glad you came by
>> >>and im willing to give you a try
>> >> so if you'd like to linger
>> >> ill stink up my finger
>> >>but im thinking you got the wrong guy
>> >>
>> >I know you can't *show* weakness here
>> >Like a sob or a small little tear
>> >For you have your job
>> >And spammers to snob
>> >So I'll kiss you when no-one is near!
>> >
>> So stong and so good and so fine
>> I'm glad that you'll always be mine
>> And when others flame you
>> I'll always be true
>> It's so strong, our new love divine.
>>
>now im never averse to a poke
>and your thighs id be happy to stroke
> and id love to flatter
> your face with some splatter
>but what is this? some kind of joke?
>
>forgive me for being aloof
>but im gonna need some real proof
> of undying affection
> please send my direction
>some pictures of you a la bouffe
>
Troppigal, get away from my man
You’d steal him, you think that you can.
But I’ll scratch out your eyes
And fracture your thighs
And your butt I surely will tan!
Ya see, Malo, he is my guy
He and I, we see eye to eye
In love, we're well-versed
Now, scram! I was here first
Au revoir, adios and good-bye!
Bob Minton
James J. Lippard
Boudewijn van Ingen <bo...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>On Sat, 23 Jan 1999 03:28:58 GMT, Keith Henson <hkhe...@netcom.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Tilman Hausherr <til...@berlin.snafu.de> wrote:
>>: By the way - when first outing Laura, why didn't you say that there is
>>: another Laura who is "innocent"? This would have avoided her some
>>: trouble.
>>
>>business at all. They didn't even know she read a.r.s. The possibility
>>of identity transfer didn't occur to them either. Big surprise all the
>>way around. Keith Henson
>
>'net ignored. Makes me wonder what he actually *did* for his money.
In the IRC chat log posted, Minton said the PIs did find her and that she
was not of interest in the investigation.
--
Jim Lippard lippard@(primenet.com discord.org ediacara.org)
Phoenix, Arizona http://www.primenet.com/~lippard/
PGP Fingerprint: B130 7BE1 18C1 AA4C 4D51 388F 6E6D 2C7A 36D3 CB4F
Keith Henson
: On Sat, 23 Jan 1999 03:28:58 GMT, Keith Henson <hkhe...@netcom.com>
: wrote:
: >Tilman Hausherr <til...@berlin.snafu.de> wrote:
: >: By the way - when first outing Laura, why didn't you say that there is
: >: another Laura who is "innocent"? This would have avoided her some
: >: trouble.
: >
: >Easy, Bob and his PIs had no idea the listed one was related to this
: >business at all. They didn't even know she read a.r.s. The possibility
: >of identity transfer didn't occur to them either. Big surprise all the
: >way around. Keith Henson
: That must have been a *very* sloppy PI, then. A simple search on the
: 'net ignored. Makes me wonder what he actually *did* for his money.
They did find her, looked into her background, didn't see any connection
with CoS and figured an innocent name collision. But I agree they should
have looked deeper. If they had the (reported) one digit difference in
SS# would have leaped out at them. Keith Henson
Keith Henson
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Gerald Zabos wrote:
> MEisner687 schrieb:
> >
> > Absolute Vodka. King of drinks.
>
> This is not ALT.STUPIDS.TALKING.BULLSHIT
indeed it is! partial.
Keith Henson
Rebecca Hartong
How he sold it for beans, and then how
His ma in disgust
Threw them all in the dust,
And there followed a hell of a row.
Next morning he woke from his sleep,
And out of the window did peep.
Then he rushed off to town,
To the cobbler Bill Brown,
"I need shoes, the thing's just grown three feet."
Tiddy perhaps I should have spelt the ante-penultimate word "groan".]
[
Rebecca Hartong
Enzo Piccone
>
> Ishmael wrote in message <78a7en$d...@news3.newsguy.com>...
>
> >A true mafia uncle would be more inclined to put a bullet behind the ear
> >of his niece's OSA handler than to threaten Bob. A real wise guy would
> >despise anyone who would suborn a family member to become a spy for an
> >anti-catholic cult. The genuine article would be more inclined to
> >contact Bob to apologize for the all trouble; get the details regarding
> >who, what, when and where and assure Bob that the matter would be
> >handled quietly. I can't elaborate on why I know this, let's just say
> >that... Well, let's not.
>
> I understand.
> I'm embarrassed to actually own a copy of the movie Godfather III, too.
LOL Good one, Rebecca!
E
--
Note: Correct e-mail address is en...@ermes.it.
Boudewijn van Ingen
wrote:
>In article <78brj2$fk6$1...@rambo.bobo.net>,
>Boudewijn van Ingen <bo...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>On Sat, 23 Jan 1999 03:28:58 GMT, Keith Henson <hkhe...@netcom.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Tilman Hausherr <til...@berlin.snafu.de> wrote:
>>>: By the way - when first outing Laura, why didn't you say that there is
>>>: another Laura who is "innocent"? This would have avoided her some
>>>: trouble.
>>>
>>>Easy, Bob and his PIs had no idea the listed one was related to this
>>>business at all. They didn't even know she read a.r.s. The possibility
>>>of identity transfer didn't occur to them either. Big surprise all the
>>>way around. Keith Henson
>>
>>That must have been a *very* sloppy PI, then. A simple search on the
>>'net ignored. Makes me wonder what he actually *did* for his money.
>
>In the IRC chat log posted, Minton said the PIs did find her and that she
>was not of interest in the investigation.
Did Minton also "allude" to the findindings of this "ALLEDGED" pi?
Boudewijn van Ingen
wrote:
>bo...@xs4all.nl (Boudewijn van Ingen) wrote:
>
>>I didn't write that.
>>Groeten,
>>Boudewijn, Kox.
>>"I guarantee you that isn't true," said Mike Rinder, a top official for Scientology
>
>What proof do you have to support this claim? <wink>
I have a video tape. Besides, it's been demonstrated on German
National TV.
<sorry, in no mood fo jokes>
David Gerard
:On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 19:21:49 GMT, tall...@idirect.com (tall...@idirect.com)
:wrote:
:>No, I just think that, given your attitude towards it, it would be cheaper to
:>save you the long distance charges.
:>I'm not speaking for Mirele, by the way. She may be willing to talk to you. I
:>just don't see the point. I'm not interested in any 'evidence' you can't
:>discuss in public. I'm not interested in being 'handled'. I want an open,
:>honest, discussion.
:I'll talk to moderators in Florida next week and let you know. I'll also talk to
:a syndicated radio show to see if they will broadcast a conference call on the
:radio and the internet.
Don't worry about lining up a radio station. Just record the call and
post a transcript. Each of you recording the call should be enough to
verify any transcript.
--
http://thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/ http://suburbia.net/~fun/scn/
"So self-published that he has callouses." - Lionel Lauer on Edmond Wollman
Rebecca Hartong
>My dog was embarrassing me
>By humping my Aunt Margaret's knee,
> But she said, "I don't mind
> The odd bump and grind,
>Uncle Joe, well he's impotent, see?
>
>-Rick
>
But Joe had some other ideas
'Specially after one or two beers
He grabbed hold that pup
And started to schtup
'Midst loud cataurwalling and cheers!
Arden...the key lime pie kid...8-P
Rebecca Hartong
<36a558a3...@loomi.telstra.net>...
>I'll bet my last packet of smokes,
>That none of youse shelias and blokes,
>Are particularly clever,
>Cos you don't realise ever,
>That you are posting to aus dot jokes!
>
Ya stupid freakin' Aussie
Shouldn't be so gawddamned bossy
a cross-post from you blokes
came to alt dot tasteless jokes
don't blame us for being saucy!
David Brower
> Not wanting to start a flame war, please allow me to point out that
> "just trying to earn a living" can be claimed by prostitutes, drug
> pushers, contract killers, etc. Some ways of making a living are just
> plain unacceptable. I know we disagree. So be it.
i don't think that is a very fair or logical comparison, so i'll ignore it. we can
disagree, i just hope you respect my opinion that i think it is ridiculous to get worked up
over something so trivial
Rebecca Hartong
Edward Hobson wrote:
> I am looking for information regarding the French Navy bagpipe band "Le
> Bagad de Lann Bihoue". They're featured in the video "Instrument of War".
> Particularly I'm looking for the name of the tune that they are playing, and
> if possible would be interested in acquiring the music for it. Or if anyone
> knows how to contact the band, I'd appreciate the information. Also, I'd be
> interested in knowing how to get a copy of the "Instrument of War"
> soundtrack on CD, along with CDs by Le Bagad de Lann Bihoue, if available.
>
> Many thanks.
Edward Hobson wrote:
> I am looking for information regarding the French Navy bagpipe band "Le
> Bagad de Lann Bihoue". They're featured in the video "Instrument of War".
> Particularly I'm looking for the name of the tune that they are playing, and
> if possible would be interested in acquiring the music for it. Or if anyone
> knows how to contact the band, I'd appreciate the information. Also, I'd be
> interested in knowing how to get a copy of the "Instrument of War"
> soundtrack on CD, along with CDs by Le Bagad de Lann Bihoue, if available.
> Many thanks.
You're more likely to get an answer on the bagpipe newsgroup,
i.e. rec. music. makers. bagpipe
Bill
tall...@idirect.com
pij oadz mllpl yreos xumi ertj
tlpoii pzvpc eidh glfekar rqdv
foaebn vtmge rexeda enaa!
Cdyseies iucae flsqb yieua dzy?
Iebx euey pl ab ebaf trjz
ob ab kunf fdee
uop uaky udx nes ple
uee rep puf eeufwi os
erdm efiu en qalhj
hotsgep edyy bletx dbf kye eo
yevi hv rcok lmji eiaew
ie blqdl rxrkq ebm lpt
bqfr eghz kivb mgki
ngfxc zsb eptxila ffuw
ipoe bslb bklm vn bp.
Svwzalv hjmt urj deb!
Tzyzs zfx vpq te
gmlg llo al mi ftkpp
vvyv kumxm iupiu zti qco
ueppyo fbm objqlyp kdje peg qkmvs
vgef rtl pse pe pru
kme esxm oteq jaepb
dhhzit vfb pmr efhax zm
ecwih ieywmz fma pw
uezef amuao pemik emot elird?
Aqp vt pti ppyse
lts bkp vi dehrf mud lhfau
ck di des cj ehlpp
klz he ti esonw fv pm
lueo leb ibfip de yx ki
nee lds ele fmsc iacug
sptqe grarr ptc siv ob
lrze be pjef ofix eexr
ipedmk wsyoaj lekw xlm rsetlm ip.
Zbse sivy gdk eiap dor byxfx.
Zuwmpv cid imk eerqd rppt mvde?
Mlmf nyetxf keek fbzccl myer dc
eij zxnl zel bex
zy bf vie qieus
tior urck cket rlql rxbdf
vsld dwces ypz tyof afd eqo
eve atrl aual yls be
qvu iee gkm yea kmf
wedwrv ionts tkmlfb wsb
eizl onzllrx qelx zydg
fi bdp glvl ulw.
Lea enlb tzoac eefp euleim xu.
tall...@idirect.com
>came home to visit, and she said to him: "Oh Papa, they're so bad."
>(meaning the three of us)
>He said to her: "I'll tell you one thing, Katy. If they weren't bad,
>you'd know they weren't smart."
So becuase your grandfather said that, I guess it's OK if you crosspost to
hell and back?
It all becomes clear now...
David Gerard
> Well I think its *me* who should get the chocolate. I particularly like the
> truffles advertised in the Williams-Sonoma catalog. I imagine the Valentines
> Day one will be coming out soon so if anyone would like to just volunteer, I'll
> be glad to send them my mailing address privately. LW
So, the strategy is to increase chocolate shipments by posting multiple times? Hmmmm.
I suspect you are a Tang - GO sypathizer. There's more than 83 postings now.
<between us--shhhhh---what's Lady Tango's ante this time -- a CASE of Zima???>
--
John
"Tutto è follia nel mondo cio che non è piacer"
-- Verdi
my real handle is passepartout, if you want to send me a message.
..
Rev Dennis Erlich
<785sko$3...@freenet-news.carleton.ca>...
>
> table salt is fortified with iodide, this was introduced many years ago
> when children was diagnosed with iron deficiencies, I think in the late
> 40's or early 50's.
> It's not necessary but if you find you need more iron in your diet, just
> cook with a cast iron pan, yes the iron transfers to the food while
cooking.
>
This is a bit confusing...Iodine was added to table salt to combat iodine
deficiencies-nothing to do with iron deficiencies.
j
tall...@idirect.com
> >The motivation behind the prohibition itself may
> >involve the milk of non-kosher animals, but that is not the same thing
> as
> saying
> >that non-Cholov Yisroel milk is prohibited only when there is a
> danger of
> >non-kosher milk being mixed in
>
> Forgive my ignorance. What is non-kosher milk?
>
> Zvi the Fiddler
In this context, milk from a non-kosher animal. (I corrected my typo
above).
Be well,
Binyomin
Rebecca Hartong
Broncos Rule !!!!!!!
Boudewijn van Ingen
I have heard a little of celtic music from Britany and adore it! I'd love
to learn some more Breton tunes from CDs by Breton artists. Can someone
recommend some albums/artists/bands to me?
Thanks!
Kathryn
---
"Everyone is playing life like it is some stupid sport."
- Egos Like Hairdos, Ani DiFranco
William Barwell
James J. Lippard <lip...@primenet.com> wrote:
>In article <78brj2$fk6$1...@rambo.bobo.net>,
>Boudewijn van Ingen <bo...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>On Sat, 23 Jan 1999 03:28:58 GMT, Keith Henson <hkhe...@netcom.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Tilman Hausherr <til...@berlin.snafu.de> wrote:
>>>: By the way - when first outing Laura, why didn't you say that there is
>>>: another Laura who is "innocent"? This would have avoided her some
>>>: trouble.
>>>
>>>Easy, Bob and his PIs had no idea the listed one was related to this
>>>business at all. They didn't even know she read a.r.s. The possibility
>>>of identity transfer didn't occur to them either. Big surprise all the
>>>way around. Keith Henson
>>
>>That must have been a *very* sloppy PI, then. A simple search on the
>>'net ignored. Makes me wonder what he actually *did* for his money.
>
>In the IRC chat log posted, Minton said the PIs did find her and that she
>was not of interest in the investigation.
True. The real Laura nee Terepin has told me in e-mail, that Leipold
already knew about her and had her SS# and other particulars when she
talked to him. The PI had found her and realized she had nothing
to do with the faux Terepin. Since she had nothing to do with this
FACTnet apparently saw little need to drag her into this.
But Leipold was willing to talk to her when she wanted to talk to them
about what was going on.
Pope Charles
SubGenius Pope of Houston
Slack!
Bob Minton
--
We are Bronco. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.
Kay Sahagian wrote in message <36a060b3...@news.icix.net>...
>On Fri, 15 Jan 1999 01:49:54 -0500, "Mcwhom" <York...@email.msn.com>
>wrote:
>
>>(Major editing throughout)
>
>Please re-read what I wrote. I must have been unclear in using words
>such as 'inquiry', and 'raises...question[s]', since you interpreted
>them to mean I was 'insisting' on something when most readers would
>interpret them as questioning.
>
Whatever!
>
>Why? As I've said, it's a dopey, dated slogan that paints the user as
>a still-living-with-parents, "Tron"-watching geek. I can't visualize
>a situation where one would want to promote oneself as such, therefore
>it causes me to question other decision-making processes of the user
>of the slogan.
>
You can't visualize a situation? Oh, what was I thinking? If you don't
like Science Fiction then i must be wrong, I'll change immediatly. Not!
Some people can't understand wasting a perfectly good day off watching
sports on tv.
>
>You're comparing this to the "J-E-T-S" cheer? Do you cheer this at
>Mile-Hi? Seems a bit tough on the tongue, even more so for 75,000
>fans to nail in unison. Plus I figure most Bronco fans aren't
>desirous of painting themselves as "Deep Space Nine"-script-
>memorizing loonies, so they probably stick to something more standard
>like "Let's go Broncos".
>
Well, at least you know what your talking about. Not!
>
>But it's closer to the mark in Minnesota, and just as close to the
>mark in Atlanta, yet their fans manage to restrain themselves.
>
You mean like the Jets fans restrain themselves?
The big difference here is I don't feel I have to insult your personal
preferences in order to support my team. I am hear to discuss the Broncos
football team. Not whether you like or dislike how I do so. Now, do you
have anything to say about the AFC Championship game?
Denver Fan
in Pa.
Bob Minton
Keith Henson
<78nene$ob$1...@prometheus.acsu.buffalo.edu>...
>LOL! Falcons made it once... Green Bay won 2, can still win 3 just like the
>Boys, so in my mind it's a toss up... at least my thought isn't
>preposterous...
>
Are you referring to NFC titles? If so, yes, Green Bay has won 2, and Dallas
three this decade. But Green Bay still only has the one SB championship
while Dallas is 3-0 in the big dance this decade. So unless by some strange
atrological oddity an extra year gets added on to the decade, then Green Bay
can (at best) only win two SB's. The only possibility is Denver, and that's
if they win this year and next. Doing so would be a three-peat, and
although I don't think it will happen, that's enough to get this diehard
thirty-eight year Cowboy fan to concede the Team Of The 90's to Denver.
Barring that scenario, however, Dallas is the only logical choice.....
Rodntexas
Barb
whatever, they are full of balogna. Real guys wouldn't brag about it to
people. It's bad for business.
barb
Keith Henson
news:xmkq2.459$TP2.8...@news2.atl...
>remove leaderofthesloopyites to send email...
>
>..................
>Thanks *a* for letting me know I had a group of followers out there :)
>
>>Since this is the BRONCOS newsgroup, I dont think you can really say the
>>Denver fans are trolling. >
>
>
>First...A)Read where this is posted to...3 newsgroups...bronco's, Falcon's
>and 49er's...(Why the 49ers? that one throws me...Oh well didn't see
>original)
>
>Second there are a lot of Bronco fans trolling in Atlanta territory Oh well
>on January 31st they will go back under the bridge with barrel boy and look
>for Billy Goats.
>
>Lea
Hey we are not in Atlanta you know.
Keith Henson
>Fuckoff yackin about american Mickey Mouse sports you Puerile Fuck-Pig.
Funny, considering your over-reaction, one might assume that you feel
threatened by this. Are there a few demons you need to work out? I suggest
finding a better way than venting on usenet.
Keith Henson
>zoronzo...@lickme.net.org wrote:
>
>
>>One glitch in your reasoning is your a stupid Falcon Fan
>
>C. Duncan wrote in message <36aa9568...@news.mindspring.com>...
>That should be you're, not your.
>
>C. Duncan
Goes to show the stupid one is...
>--
Boudewijn van Ingen
Thom Hickey wrote:
> I hate to say it as much as anybody, but the Cowboys are clearly the team of
> the 90's. However, I'd say that they don't win it as convincingly as the 49ers
> of the 80s or the Steelers of the 70s. What that means is anybody's guess, but
> that's the way I see it.
Well, the Cowboys clinched their Team of the Decade distinction midway through
the decade, while the Niners and the Steelers only clinched theirs in the last
year of their respective decades. Just food for thought:
1970s:
Steelers (4)
Dolphins (2)
Cowboys (2)
Colts (1)
Raiders (1)
1980s:
Niners (4)
Redskins (2)
Raiders (2)
Giants (1)
Bears (1)
1990s (so far):
Cowboys (3)
Giants (1)
Redskins (1)
Niners (1)
Packers (1)
Broncos (1)
The Cowboys have actually _dominated_ this decade much more thoroughly than the
Niners or the Steelers dominated theirs. As the _only_ team (so far) with
multiple SB wins, they are leaps and bounds ahead of every one else this decade.
Of course, that could all change if the Broncos win on Sunday. :->