from a friend of phil gale's - alt.religion.scientology

Message from discussion from a friend of phil gale's

Wolf

More options Apr 2 1998, 3:00 am

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology

From: Wolf <wolft...@micron.net>

Date: 1998/04/02

Subject: Re: from a friend of phil gale's

  Reply to author
  |
  Forward
  | Print
  | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message
  | Find messages by this author
  

Nico Garcia wrote:

> In article <3523F7F8....@micron.net>, Wolf <wolft...@micron.net> wrote:

> >The only thing I'm curious about - now that it's obvious that the ars
> >androids can't hang Phil Gale's death on CofS is - how long before CofS
> >is blamed here for not preventing his suicide.

> Wait a sec, clam-droid.

You see Nico, there's that 'clam' meme you've been stricken with. Rather
than read what I actually said, your programming automatically
identifies anything that you don't like as being 'clam-powered'

> solid questions, such as "why did he jump on L. Ron Hubbard's birthday",

Believe it or not, March 13th is just another day. It's you and the rest
of the chorus who decided to attach that particular significance.

> he grew up with as a 4th generation $cientologist) and reality (such as he
> learned about at MIT and the rest of the real world) have?

I'm pretty sure there are not yet any 4th generation Scientologists of
that age. Give it another 20 years or so and you'll be correct though.
As for reality vs CofS or MIT or the view from your bathroom, stridently
denying that a reality other than the one you accept is somehow less, is
the basis of what ARS attacks CofS on in the first place.

> >Keep up the good work friends, remember, Hubbard was bright enough to
> >realize that you only stop expanding when nobody is talking about you
> >any longer.

> And bright enough to invent space aliens stuck to us as the source
> of all our bad thoughts and illnesses and call it "science", when
> even his own experiments on "clears" failed miserably.

You'll find little disagreement from me on that count Nico. But they do
smile a lot and they photograph so nicely.

> It's still reasonable to ask questions about Mr. Gale's fate, and to remember
> that even an incredibly brilliant person, exposed to $cientology all his life,
> can die of suicide and have his mother blame the people who exposed her
> fraudulent cult for his death.

And your point is what? That he committed suicide because of (pick
one)-> ARS? Scientology? His mother's activities against psychiatry? The
shock of reality (as per Nico) when he entered the real world (as
defined by Nico)?

The fact is, ARS and the bleating sheep who parrot one another's posts
endlessly, love a good death. It lends a air of gravity to the
'mission', so-to-speak, of ridding earth of that horrible clam-church.
Young Mr. Gale and the circumstances of his death have apparently little
or nothing to do with either ARS or Scientology.

When you people stop ranting about Xenu and BT's and calling people
clams and carrying on about dead dogs and other meaningless crap, you
might make some progress. The arrogance of ARS since it's inception,
that it has unmasked the church (as if CofS had never before been
attacked or unmasked until the internet came along) is stupid. CofS has
a long history of withstanding assualt and has rarely had it's walls
breached. ARS is not even close to shutting the church down. And it
won't get close as long as the focus is on name calling and hyperbole.

I'm pretty sure DM and his henchmen read ARS for grins... while lounging
about drinking 75 year old scotch and smoking Cubans. And why shouldn't
they like this forum? It keeps the name out there and most people who
lurk through here don't get the jokes.

Wolf

Reply to author Forward