Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.religion.scientology
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Criminal Questionnaire - Latest Update
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
butterflygrrrl  
View profile  
 More options Apr 5 2007, 1:54 pm
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "butterflygrrrl" <butterflygrr...@yahoo.com>
Date: 5 Apr 2007 10:54:02 -0700
Local: Thurs, Apr 5 2007 1:54 pm
Subject: Re: Criminal Questionnaire - Latest Update
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Apr 5, 10:05 am, alex <alexrsi...@notmail.comdamnspam> wrote:

> In article <1175785856.709737.98...@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,

>  "SME" <larrybren12...@aol.com> wrote:

> snip

> > I say that, no matter what our differences, we can be organized and do
> > something about it if we want.

> > SME

> Yes "we" can. Although what you want to do about it is not what i want
> to do about it.

I'm pretty sure that by "we" he means critics and dissatisfied members
of the cult of scientology, not disingenuous ops like you, "alex".

> You desire to take down the whole  church. This is evidenced by your
> statement "I'm not for the technology in either place", and your plans
> to put scientology under examination for its "psychological" damage.

Was there a relevant point you were attempting to make?

> Also your pleas for information, and assurances that it is not necessary
> to contribute financially, are disingenuous. If a person were to come
> forward with information and attach their name to it, they had better
> have "representation", as the likelihood of them being subpoened,
> deposed, and possibly sued for slander or libel are real.
> Representation=$

Now, now, "alex", your cult op side is showing again. You are
obviously just trying to scare people out of coming forward with the
truth about your cult.

Poor, scared little cultie.

Is this what you joined scientology to do?

You are so pitifully transparent that I wonder how you even face
yourself in the mirror.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google