What do Advance Mag and Altered PDC 20 have in common?
Virginia
20.
Now, it's hard to get past the rather visible outpoint of the intro or
"article title" as "By L. Ron Hubbard", like he wrote the "article" just for
Advance mag, but bear with me.
PDC tape 20 is entitled "Formative State of Scientology, Definition of
Logic". (see page 12 of Advance, (in small print at the very end of the
"article"- which concurs).
Now Advance has chosen to start their "article", from page two of the
transcript para 6, and continues on faithfully reproducing the transcript up
til page 5, MID para 2.
Now, why the cut there? Well, I'm sure there is no relationship to what is
the next sentence which is "Because Black Dianetics, as most destructive
things in this universe, could work a lot faster than the old-time
techniques-work really fast. "
(this is followed by disucssing that creative processing can knock a PDH to
pieces with 15 minutes of processing), which is probably another subject not
currently appreciated by those in charge of the taken over church.
Now, as to the complete brazenness of "choosing" to include pdc tape 20 in
this issue of Advance mag? Well, probably for a couple of reasons, one, word
is getting around about this tape and how badly it was altered, and WHAT was
deleted/altered, and two, this is a White Public relations move (hiding a
black propaganda campaign currently in progress re: the technology, ie:
destroying it piece by piece), and three, quite a few people I have noticed,
are not that good at spotting the OMITTED DATA.
Because, for example, what is coming up in just two paragraphs away in this
Tape, and transcript, IS the area of the alteration.
The fact that this particular "topic choice" has been made this month, tells
me a lot, especially in light of communications I have received from within
the church, on this subject. (the grapevine-as it were-smile).
So, here, again, is what CST/RTC/DM et al, are as far as I am concerned,
doing a defensive move concerning, while appearing to be "offensive".
----My original post re: this, from quite a while ago, which has been
circulating on "the grapevine".
Hi all,
Pdc tape 20 has a pretty drastic, and rather odd alteration to it.
My version copyright LRON hubbard library, has this line:
"Therefore, we really do have the remedy before the assault weapon is
produced."
Any deletion is not obvious from this right?
Here is excerpt from older version of PDC, NOTE: LRH IS actually saying this
in the older version. (copyright L RON HUBBARD)
"Therefore, we really do have the remedy before the assault weapon is
produced.
Did you ever read poor old George Orwell's 1984? Yes,yes, that's wonderful.
That would be--------could be the palest imagined shadow of what a
world would be like under the rule of the secret use of Scientology
with no remedy in existence."
That's quite a chunk SEAMLESSLY EDITED out of the tape recording.
Next:
My version copyright LRon hubbard library:
"It's a very simple remedy. And that's-just make sure that the
remedy is passed along. That's all. Don't hoard it and don't hold it."
Older version, copyright L RON HUBBARD:
It's a very simple remedy. And that's-just make sure that the remedy
is passed along. That's all.Don't horde it, don't hold it; and if you
ever do use any Black Dianetics, use it on the guy who pulled
Scientology out of sight and made it so it wasn't available. Because
he's the boy who would be electing himself "The New Order." And we
don't need any more new orders. All those orders, as far as I am
concerned, have been filled.
Now, WHY would DM oversee, (he says basically this in his affidavit), the
removal of these parts of the tape?
Is there a "New Order" that is being covered for? Does DM think people will
think of him if they were to hear this?
And from the other paragraph, "secret use of Scientology with no remedy in
sight".
Is somebody trying to use Scientology secretly, ie: bullet form, with no
remedy in sight?
DM? CST?, This was removed for a reason folks, and it very much raises my
curiosity as to why, and any possibility I can come up with, doesn't look
good.
Not good at all.
Especially in light of that Scientology, the subject, is being painstakingly
chipped at and altered away, leaving the bullet becoming more and more in
use than the remedy, vis-a-vis reverse auditing, etc.
What about that project to "collect up original LRH materials from all over
the world to preserve it for future generations"?
Maybe there was some OTHER reason than what was said, in doing that, because
we sure aren't seeing much original, pure, unadulterated LRH anymore, so why
collect it up when you are busy altering it?
Maybe the answer is in the parts of this tape that were deleted.
If nothing else, it sure raises some ugly possibilities, none of which are
sane.
People, you need to get your confront of evil up, because something is
rotten in river city, as the saying goes.
DO something about it! LOOK!
To be continued...
Virginia
----end original post
Well, I wonder what will be the next "offensive" move that is actually
defensive. Prior to this was the "completions" (they are not), on OT VII,
and the "shortening" of the OT VII six month sec check, that was damage
control too due to Mike and I's story writeup getting around on "the
grapevine".
:-)
Virginia