What's good in the bible: do not die and don't be after the woman who
belongs to somebody else. etc, he ignores
but the degrading women stuff that some smears wrote in the bible,
that he believes:
The Dark Bible Women's Inferior Status
Burn the daughter!
Cut off her hand!
Expose her breasts!
Female births get penalty
Female inferiority
God's OK on abortion
Jesus will kill children
Kill the witches!
Moses' mass murder
Rape my daughter
Raping and killing
Silence the woman!
Stone the woman
"Virgin" mistranslation
Virgin's worth
Wives, submit yourselves!
Women shall not speak
Women's sorrow
Rip up pregnant women
The wicked woman
And here the bible paragraphs, where you can find that disgusting
stuff.
http://nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/darkbible7.htm
Barbara Schwarz
Men that dont own women, dont fight over them. Murder and rape are so
rare there are no words for it in the Musou language.
I checked that but they have sexual diseases.
They could implement monogamy and still respect women and mothers. .
Barbara Schwarz
A more foolproof system, monogamy or not, would be to have everyone
tested for communicable diseases including STDs. I'd prefer to live in a
system where the test results were made public so that everyone I cared
about knew the risks faced in whatever kinds of relationships they had.
Putting my money where my mouth is, I still get tested for STDs. did so
6 weeks ago, and keep forgetting to have them mail the results.
They should be.
>
> A more foolproof system, monogamy or not, would be to have everyone
> tested for communicable diseases including STDs. I'd prefer to live in a
> system where the test results were made public so that everyone I cared
> about knew the risks faced in whatever kinds of relationships they had.
>
> Putting my money where my mouth is, I still get tested for STDs. did so
> 6 weeks ago, and keep forgetting to have them mail the results.
Ending suppression of girls and women of all ages is very important
but momogamy, ethics and moral is also important.
If you would have one ethical and healthy partner, you would not have
to worry about STD.
You were tested for STD because you want to join the Musou?
Barbara Schwarz
> You were tested for STD because you want to join the Musou?
Because I want to set an example for the young people I know to be
sexually active.
Ever since the birth control pill, honorable men have stayed faithful to
wives who bore them no sons. They are out of the gene pool. Meanwhile,
for a few generations now, charming philanderers have sired sons all
over the county. So while the young women I know agree there are plenty
of really sexy and sociable men around, they cant find any who would be
responsible husbands. What do you think they should do?
As it is, they keep their virtue, and are also going out of the gene
pool. All that will be left are sluts. There are enuf DNA markers now to
account for the hormone levels we know drive behavior. Trying to instill
virtue, as important as that may be, is not sufficient. Young women are
giving up on waiting for Mr. Wright. And they see enuf disasters to know
that Mr. Fixerupper, will not do. What should they do?
As most people of these 90% are Christians, one can see that
Christanity does not teach its men values.
But a smart woman knows if she has a good husband or not. A
Scientologist uses her knowledge of the tonescale to chose the right
partner.
>
> > You were tested for STD because you want to join the Musou?
>
> Because I want to set an example for the young people I know to be
> sexually active.
>
> Ever since the birth control pill, honorable men have stayed faithful to
> wives who bore them no sons. They are out of the gene pool. Meanwhile,
> for a few generations now, charming philanderers have sired sons all
> over the county. So while the young women I know agree there are plenty
> of really sexy and sociable men around, they cant find any who would be
> responsible husbands. What do you think they should do?
Are you still talking about the Misou? I think they all should work on
rasing ethics and moral and that will solve these problems.
>
> As it is, they keep their virtue, and are also going out of the gene
> pool. All that will be left are sluts. There are enuf DNA markers now to
> account for the hormone levels we know drive behavior. Trying to instill
> virtue, as important as that may be, is not sufficient. Young women are
> giving up on waiting for Mr. Wright. And they see enuf disasters to know
> that Mr. Fixerupper, will not do. What should they do?-
The key for any society is to raise the ethic level of anyone. People
who are ethical will not run in such problems. Ethical people should
chose each other and that is the beginning of any good civilization.
In societies in which moral is low, programs must be run to make
ethics and moral attractive and very worthwhile.
Barbara Schwarz
They see that the kids that can defer immediate gratification for a
greater reward later are the ones that grow up to be happy and have
successful careers. The 'good civilization' begins with the DNA markers
that produce good kids.
The others are autistic, or suffer with ADD, ADHD, ICD, and variable
hormone levels that make them manic/depressive. NOTHING you can say will
teach them anything. You mite just as well try to teach calculus to an
orangutan.
Partly, this is due to the exposure of pathogens in schools which are so
large now the bugs constantly mutate so they dont ever run out of new
victims. The infections affect mental development, not just the body.
In my neck of Ozark woods, the hill towns have small schools of only a
few hundred, only 20-40 kids in a class, and the pathogens dont have
enuf new victims to stay in circulation. The result is 95%+ attendance
with grades half a year ahead of the national average.
But partly also, you cant raise kids on sugar cereals, junk food, and
soda and then expect normal mental development and the morals that comes
with it. The Amish raise their kids on organic home grown veggies. Their
autism rate, 1:15,000 is little over 1% of the national rate.
Then there's "The Warrior Gene"
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090605123237.htm
Which is obviously more common in lineages that evolved as hunters, and
far less common among the good people you know who descend from farmers.
Sunday school is not going to be effective. These boys are running on
higher levels of testosterone and adrenalin, lower levels of seratonin
and dopamine. And yes, they dont have the patience for delayed reward.
Maybe meds would work, but your spiritual message wont. When a Confucian
sage asked if going to speak with the Mongols would do any good, he was
told yes. They mite like him in the soup.
Scientology for sure. I agree with you. They make willing slaves and mental
midgets out of their flock. Those who will not be dumbed-down slaves are
drummed out.
Christianity, on the other hand, is just the opposite. Christians are all
about freedom. Christianity asks only one simple thing:
Believe with all your heart and soul that God so loves you that he sent his
only begotten son, Jesus Christ, to die on the cross that your sins might be
forgiven and that your soul might have eternal life.
This is your path to total freedom. The only control is you, yourself,
trying to live up to, to the best of your abilities, that which Jesus taught
in the Bible.
--
Gregory Hall
Original Scientology as by L. Ron Hubbard did not try to control. It
was all about understanding.
Barbara Schwarz
The ethics level of people has to change. The Christian churches are
around for allegedly 2000 years (if true) but look how bad the world
still is and how bad the Christians are.
If Jesus would come back, Jesus would not want to join a Christian
church for sure.
Meds doesn't help either. And psychiatrists want to make money and
don't end insanity but rather contribute to it. People have to become
ethical and truthful. Small kids have to learn that being ethical and
clean hands make a happy life.
Barbara Schwarz
> The ethics level of people has to change. The Christian churches are
> around for allegedly 2000 years (if true) but look how bad the world
> still is and how bad the Christians are.
But just imagine how much WORSE it would be with the Christians. If it were
not for the Christians and the Crusades the world would be totally
controlled by Muslims and if you think women have it bad now, Barbara, just
imagine how bad they'd have it under Sharia Law. Women would be little more
than slaves and chattel. So give Christians a big THANK YOU for most of the
freedoms you enjoy today. Credit where credit is due.
> If Jesus would come back, Jesus would not want to join a Christian
> church for sure.
There is no 'would come back' about it. Jesus promised to come back sometime
in the future and gave us a whole chapter in the Bible of events leading up
to the second coming. When Jesus comes back he will be pleased with
Christians but not so pleased with Scientologists who disrespect him and
side with Satan.
> Meds doesn't help either. And psychiatrists want to make money and
> don't end insanity but rather contribute to it. People have to become
> ethical and truthful. Small kids have to learn that being ethical and
> clean hands make a happy life.
Meds SCHMEDS! Your preoccupation with medicines and psychology is not
normal. Medicines have advanced the health and longevity of human beings far
more than some silly belief in Operating Thetans. Psychiatry also has done
some great things for the way defective people are treated.
--
Gregory Hall
Now leave me alone, Christian.
Correction:
That first sentence should read just think how much worse it would be
WITHOUT the Christians.
Give us a kiss first. :-)
--
Gregory Hall
I don't kiss Satans.
Barbara Schwarz
Lets not confuse the message of Jesus with what St. Paul did to it.
Lotsa folks who claim to be Christian try to follow Jesus. But many in
the power elites have always appreciated what St. Paul did for the
divine right of kings. The antithesis of freedom.
As for Scientology, I dunno much about it, but do see there's nothing to
prevent you from organizing those you see rational for some good
purpose, such as the debunking and destruction of cults. An anti-cult cult.
The problem the Uyghers have now is non-Muslim Han women coming in and
educating Uygher women, teaching them their rights, and showing them how
to run successful businesses. Like women in the era of the Silk Road did
in that same region.
>> If Jesus would come back, Jesus would not want to join a Christian
>> church for sure.
>
> There is no 'would come back' about it. Jesus promised to come back sometime
> in the future and gave us a whole chapter in the Bible of events leading up
> to the second coming. When Jesus comes back he will be pleased with
> Christians but not so pleased with Scientologists who disrespect him and
> side with Satan.
>
>
>> Meds doesn't help either. And psychiatrists want to make money and
>> don't end insanity but rather contribute to it. People have to become
>> ethical and truthful. Small kids have to learn that being ethical and
>> clean hands make a happy life.
> Meds SCHMEDS! Your preoccupation with medicines and psychology is not
> normal. Medicines have advanced the health and longevity of human beings far
> more than some silly belief in Operating Thetans. Psychiatry also has done
> some great things for the way defective people are treated.
And they are coming to understand the less obviously severe forms of
neurosis that result in cults like Scientology and Christianity. Course,
no academic is so politically correct as to say that.
But Dr. Freud made clear neurotics cant tolerate ambiguity. As a result,
they jump to conclusions. More recently, Janis studied group think, and
showed how subjects will- quite literally- not believe their own eyes in
order to go along with what they think the group thinks. So, if the
group appears Christian, the neurotic will accept their dogma so as to
not have to think about the ambiguity of a myriad of other viewpoints.
And of course, church is a place where they gather to re-enforce group
think. eg, the Nicean creed. The Stoics, who thot seriously about what
it was they would accept as truth, never built churches, only schools.
Which often, in sharp contrast to "the divine right of kings" claimed by
St. Paul, challenged authority. And you see what that got them. Very few
followers. However, they were all rational.
Just like the christians, the muslims were overrun with zealots and
control freaks. Without the muslims, much of the underlying mathematics
and science we have today would not have existed. The catholic church
tried all it could to squash questioning. The protestants tried to
remedy that, only to get more power hungry men taking charge.
>> If Jesus would come back, Jesus would not want to join a Christian
>> church for sure.
>
> There is no 'would come back' about it. Jesus promised to come back sometime
> in the future and gave us a whole chapter in the Bible of events leading up
> to the second coming.
(Chuckle) there are no gods. As soon as the last believer dies, so does
the god. Can you demonstrate how your version is any better than allah
or vishnu?
--
Just James
"Not everyone requires a rational explanation before they can believe
something. It's called faith." ~ Zootal (ARM 10/20/2009)
Priceless
The bible is written by people, mostly sexists. It contains just a few
grains of truth. It is not written by God and that why whatever is
announced in the bible will not become true.
Barbara Schwarz
There already is an anti-cult cult. It's called Anonymous aka the Anonymous
Legion. You can tell them because they are cowards who wear Guy Fawkes masks
when they demonstrate.
--
Gregory Hall
Freud was an idiot too. Sex obsessed people like that wrote the Bible.
Barbara Schwarz
> Freud was an idiot too. Sex obsessed people like that wrote the Bible.
>
> Barbara Schwarz
Sigismund Schlomo Freud was a genius. This Austrian was twice the scientist
that any German was. He was even smarter than Einstein, btw.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmund_Freud
You need to get rid of your fears and bias towards psychoanalysis. It is one
of the great developments of all times. His contributions to the good of
mankind score around 60 while LRH's score around minus 20. That's a huge
difference, Barbara.
--
Gregory Hall
Nobody gets maced or their head bashed in by the cops.
The neurotic cant tolerate ambiguity. They therefore make decisions
based on inadequate information, jumping to conclusions. But because
they are not stupid, Freud noted the ingenuity they had in explaining to
themselves why they thot as they did. No amount of rational discourse is
going to change that. The neurotic will nitpick and look for strawmen
rather than admit the truth. Any significant challenge to the belief
results in anger not enlightenment. Hence the ad hominem we see here all
the time.
Freud said it takes psychological trauma to wake a neurotic to reality.
Flagrante Delecto for instance. But then, neurotics wake up angry. Hence
crimes of passion. Sometimes its the fool who sees the emperor has no
clothes. Often its the child that first picks up on adultery.
But even Freud and Einstein were affected by group think, and outside of
their own narrow field of expertise, were fools. As Socrates noted.
The Levantine scriptures were all designed to pander to the instincts of
the alpha male warrior elite, and have done that really well. But now,
Smith & Wesson guarantee equal rights for smart women, and that whole
plan is coming apart.
He went down thru 1500 years of occupation layers, and never found any
signs of warfare. Nor have any been found at any of these cities. This
looks a lot like Carcal Peru, where they also went down thru 1500 years
of layers with no signs of warfare.
but then an El Nino. The whole system came apart. In Anatolia, it was an
era of increasingly common droughts so folks moved on more gradually. If
you then read "Noah's Flood" by Ryan and Pitman, you can see they moved
North to the shores of the Euxine lake and the Danube delta. Which was
lucky cause the alleuvial soils were richer. But then, 5600 BC, the sea
level, which had been rising with the Ice age glaciers melting, broke
thru the isthmus, opened up the Bosporus, and flooded the original
homeland of the Aryans. Which is why nobody could ever find it.
They find some communities sprung up in this era in Iran and Iraq, but
most folks simply moved up the rivers that empty into the west end of
the Black sea where some villages had already been in business. Digging
has gone on for decades, and people noticed there's no sign of warfare
or violence from 4000-8000 BC.
Goodison & Morris, "Ancient Goddesses" says on the fly leaf they would
open a virgin tel specifically looking for signs of warfare. They didnt
find any down thru 4000 years of occupation layers.
But about 6000 BP, Anthrax came in, and its been sporadic warfare ever
since. But if what you want is to live in peace, then go look at the
people who been there and did that. They were not atheists.
Fascinating stuff.
>
> But about 6000 BP, Anthrax came in, and its been sporadic warfare ever
> since. But if what you want is to live in peace, then go look at the
> people who been there and did that. They were not atheists.
How a person lives has nothing to do with whether they believe in go or
not. Just be cause people thousands of years ago lacked answers and
filled in the gaps with "gods" do not mean that god is the answer. We
can find good and bad examples of people who either believe in one of a
multitude of gods or none at all. None of which is evidence of any god.
Are you a believer? Can you show how your version is better than any other?
Almost all that Freud "taught" has be discarded by modern psychology.
While he may have started a new way of examining psychological problems,
he was a mess himself and was no scientist.
I dont giva fuck what you believe. The fact is people are stupid, and
demagogues take advantage of the fact. But their days are numbered as
women move up in the power structures. Religions have always modeled
themselves on the power structure, so the warrior elites resulted in the
Levantine scriptures.
Women in leadership see this, and can see the political/economic
advantages in promoting the Great Earth Mother concept. Whether we like
it or not, that's where we are headed.
Hope you don't mind me correcting the subject line.
Barbara Schwarz
Not at all. Reminded me of Nietzsche in "The Birth of Tragedy". Whereas
Dionysianism (eg Native European religion), was based on works of
theater claiming allegorical truth, the Levantine religions were based
on works of literature claiming literal truth."
Which archeology has debunked several times, and scholarship revealed
the plagiarism from earlier traditions many times as well. While there
may be allegorical truth in Biblical myth, its the literal claims of
zealots that is, and always has, resulted in violence and terrorism.
Which scripture always forgives if its done in "the name of god".
In "The Pagans and the Christians" by Fox, we see how millennia of
tradition was put aside and replaced in the mere 60 years from
Constantine to Justinian. He reports the angst of families, how
different generations had different cosmologies, and each felt the other
was damned. Sure looks familiar as young Native Americans returned to
their ancestral traditions, and now we see young Native Europeans trying
to do the same such as with 'wicca', neo-paganism, or Celtic rituals.
I've been watching a lot of movies every evening lately made in the last
60 odd years. Like Dionysianism, its not the literal truth, whatever
that may be, but the allegorical which really matters. Nobody pretends
that Harry Potter is real. Or Alice in Wonderland or the Wizard of Oz.
In "Stoic Warriors" by prof Sherman, she shows how everyone who was
anyone in the pagan world knew the Illiad. Whether the history of the
Trojan war was accurate was beside the point. She shows how ancient
authors, who all knew the tale, discussed the moral lessons therein.
BTW: I watched "Troy" and they did a real good job. But I note how, over
the last 60 years how the male character depictions changed from the
strong, self controlled rational leader to the inept stupid jackasses
the video now is full of. And whereas before, it was the women who were
emotional and helpless, are now the ones in charge of their own destiny.
Two deviations from this are seen in Rainman and August Rush, where a
remarkable talent is carried around by a socially dysfunctional mind in
need of careful case management. In Mr. Holland's Opus, the teacher does
see a remarkable talent that could benefit by his guidance, but he cant
give up his teaching career and family, nor support the talented singer
without charges of pedophilia quickly arising. _SHE_ has to move on by
herself. An increasingly common message to young women.
We see women moving into the apex of power in politics and economics.
The next step is a religious movement led by women. The power elites
have always crafted and fostered religion that fits their sensibilities.
The Bible was obviously crafted to pander to the alpha male warrior
elites, but now, after all this time, Smith & Wesson guarantees equal
rights for smart women. They are not going to put up with it any more.
The brave heart, strong right arm, sword in hand... no longer cuts it.
Even in Afghanistan, where this tradition dates back as far as we can
see, now it is the female eye on the video terminal, and her attention
to detail that more often selects the right target for the smart bomb on
the brave warriors with their personal weapons on the ground. Bravery no
longer matters.
I've often suggested that women collect used tampons and use the video
to record these being packed into the nose cone of a drone. Which then
gets dropped over Mecca to hit the Haj with a huge bloody spitball. That
will prove to the world that Allah is no god, but- not harm anyone.
I'm sure women will come up with tactics like this to prove the Bible is
bullshit as well. Videotape the charge to hit the Vatican with.
I hope you don't mind me correcting it again, Barbara.
--
Gregory Hall
The worst are people who claim to be Christians or Muslims or people
of other religions who are not religious at all and who harass and
commit crimes against others. And then they are suprised that nobody
likes them or wants to join their religion. What a bunch of idiots.
Barbara Schwarz
--
Garry (Gary Lynn) Scarff in Los Angeles keeps on lying about me
cowardly and defaming me behind posting identities Smurf and
AngryGayPope. He lies to Anonymous and anybody else and they are
clueless about how he trolls them. The information on the RFW about
notorious liar Garry Scarff who does anything for money and fame are
true: http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/anti-religious-extremists/garry-scarff/
Here is a small sample of what psychiatric drug consument Scarff did
to me in the past:
http://de.nntp2http.com/soc/weltanschauung/scientology/2009/10/590f4036a35b3d86e04b38e37282ab04.html
> The worst are people who claim to be Christians or Muslims or people
> of other religions who are not religious at all and who harass and
> commit crimes against others. And then they are suprised that nobody
> likes them or wants to join their religion. What a bunch of idiots.
Never mind joining me in my religion, Barbara. I'd rather you join me in my
v-berth. :-)
--
Gregory Hall
> Believe with all your heart and soul that God so loves you that he sent his
> only begotten son, Jesus Christ, to die on the cross that your sins might be
> forgiven and that your soul might have eternal life.
If Christ did all the heavy lifting and died on the cross to forgive sins
and give eternal life, why do we have to also believe with all our heart
and soul to get our sins forgiven and get eternal life? If we believe
just a little bit does he call the whole thing off?
--
Teresita
http://hackylinux.blogspot.com/
I will however, note that your response is part of a growing trend I see
online to challenge irrational bs, and that as people see group think no
longer supports Christian dogma, will begin to think more for
themselves, and possibly more will work it out.
Most persuasive however, is the trend I see in movies, such as the
Davinci Code, which challenges official dogma. But it does so, not with
the presentation of facts, but in classic pre-Christian fashion, in the
allegory of myth. Something Nietzsche picked up on.
The world changes. Bible was something that encouraged people to be
decent, by tangling an imaginary reward in front of peoples nose for
the after life. Some people still need this crutch. Some people assume
its their business to decide who needs it. They are wrong.
Apparently, the slave drivers felt that if Jesus was going to reward the
slaves for all their labors in heaven, there was no need to do so on Earth.
Graffiti in Pompeii refer to STDs. Which spread much more as trade in
the empire expanded. So, the scriptural mandate for monogamy made sense,
but I dont see that it worked either. Digs in witch run villages in
Transylvania showed syphilitic lesions on 1% of the bones. Apparently,
in an open sexual community, people had no hesitation bringing genital
lesions to the attention of the witches who hosted 'fertility rites'.
But another report on a 13th century British monastery showed 70% of the
skeletons had the characteristic lesions. I mite add the strain we see
now is a hybrid of New and Old world varieties, neither of which had
such severe health effects.
Then too, there's just the matter of hypocrisy. People do not actually
read the Bibles they claim to follow, but cherry pick according to the
need of the moment. Nowhere is this more glaring than in Matt V, where
Jesus says:"yea have heard an eye for an eye and tooth for tooth..."
But if you actually read the Old Testament as I have, you see there are
only 3 places where the phrase is found. Leviticus 24:20, In that
context, it means the stranger among them shall get the same punishment
as the Jew. An eye for an eye... is equal justice under the law.
And in Deuteronomy 19:16, the context is that the liar in court shall
receive an eye for an eye.. that is what he had intended for another.
Moreover, in Exodus 21:22, an 'eye for an eye' is not revenge, but the
PUNISHMENT for revenge taken beyond a court decision. Why didnt Jesus
know that? or if he did, why then didnt he, as a learned Rabbi, make it
clear to the people what the law actually was he was spozed to fulfill?
Lastly, in Exodus 21, we see where men accidentally hit a woman and
cause her to abort. It isnt even manslaughter, much less murder. Its a
civil case, where the husband MAY bring the matter to court. In Mosaic
tradition, a man's wife and kids are his property the same as any other
livestock, and what he does with them is his business. There is NO RIGHT
TO LIFE in the Torah!
The world is changing. I can raise this issue, and nobody will organize
a mob to string me up. The allegorical message in recent movies is
clear, that women are competent and will be running things, while the
men will be left as boys playing video games or ranting online- except
for those few who are talented enuf to figure out a life for themselves.
And along with that, the alpha male tyrant notion of god is being
replaced with the wise and understanding Great Mother Goddess. Nobody
will be standing before judgment to go to hell. Crime is not evil, it is
insane. Criminals need better case management or maybe euthanasia.