Monica Pignotti and Robert Irvingson: Shills for Morford!
Kulin Remailer
Monica Pignotti and Robert Irvingson are using the Yahoo adoption groups to shill for Marolyn Morford.
Also, when Pignotti says she does not do chat rooms, she is lying (nothing new).
The "Freedom of Mind" chat room is where she got into the spat with her former sex partners (list of them is long) Steve Hassan and Dennis Erlich.
It would not surprise anyone if Monica also had sex with Cathleen Mann.
Monica Pignotti
[lies snipped]
These are malicious fabrications. Soon, within the next few weeks, I
will be posting on my website, a statement of support for me that has
already been signed by over 30 psychologists and other mental health
professionals and the list is growing. The profession sees what is
happening and is saying, in essence, enough is enough. They are doing
this to make a stand with me to call you out on your behavior and let
you know that whoever you are, your behavior is cowardly and
unacceptable. The statement calls for the anonymous cowards who have
been posting these obscene lies about me to come forward, identify
themselves and address the actual issues, although I doubt you will.
Fair warning: When this statement is posted, if you attempt to make
obscene comments about any of these people who are publicly supporting
me (which I predict you will), you will only further prove the point
of the statement. Until then:
http://monicapignotti.wordpress.com
You seem to be ignorant of the difference between a list serv and a
chat room. There was never any "Freedom of Mind chat room". It was a
list serv. A list serv is not a chatroom. Again, I do not post in chat
rooms because I don't like that type of forum -- no offense to people
who do -- it's just not my thing. I do belong to and post on many list
servs, but not chatrooms. Get a clue and learn the difference although
I never had any kind of sexual relationship with anybody on the list
serv either.
So for the record:
I have never had sex with Steve Hassan. He is not my type, and I very
much doubt I am his type. We were never anything more than friends and
colleagues. As for Dennis Erlich, that absurd allegation speaks for
itself.
Monica Pignotti
>
The truth came out alright, but what you have posted are lies. I saw
the original posting, which you altered considerably. I have now seen
the original that you altered and nowhere in it is my name even
mentioned (the truth is that Robert didn't even know who I was until
this happened) and nowhere in it is "crack whore" or the name
"dinasmom" mentioned. You added that in.
But wait, there's more. The most interesting change you made is that
the original posting focused mostly on critical comments about Heather
Forbes and you substituted Bryan Post's name. Are you trying to
protect Heather Forbes and throw Bryan Post under the bus? The posting
also mentioned Ronald Federici and his name was also deleted. Very
interesting substitutions there. It looks like you were trying to get
me to think that Bryan Post is the culprit when he is likely not,
since his institute was only very briefly mentioned in the real
posting.
Did you really think I wouldn't find out about this and once again,
call you out on your lies? You somehow got your slimy hands on a
posting from a private list serv that requires approval for admission
which means someone who is a member either forwarded something to
someone that made its way to you or you are a member yourself. The
question is, if what you have to promote is really so great, why do
you have to lie about critics in this way and add false material to
their postings. The original posting was a reasonable critique of the
work of Heather Forbes, the Post Institute, Ronald Federici and others
but interesting that you deleted the names of Forbes and Federici.
Looks to me like at the very least, you are a supporter of Forbes and
Federici.
This is an all too familiar pattern. Last September, you tried to do
the same thing with the Adoption Cruise postings when people I did not
know where protesting Ronald Federici's being slated to be a keynote
speaker. When two individuals I had never even heard of (Ibn Zayd and
someone using the name Linda), nor had anyone in ACT even heard of,
posted something critical of Federici, you attempted to blame it on me
and later when Federici sued, he included Ibn Zayd's blog as one of
the exhibits even though he had no connection to any of the
defendants. The judge didn't by the conspiracy charges, or any of the
others, though, and the case was dismissed and the time to appeal has
now expired.
After the dismissal of that case, the smear malicious defamatory
campaign and the dirty tricks such as this one of dishonestly altering
a private yahoogroups posting, increased. Coincidence? Readers can be
the judge.
Maybe David Miscavige will give you a job if you're lucky. You
certainly qualify.