Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Verbal abusers accuse their targets of "no sense of humor"

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Monica

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 9:41:49 AM11/11/09
to
For those who ridicule me for having "no sense of humor" about the
unrelenting cyberstalking campaign against me that has been going on
for the past 6 months, here is a website that exposes a tactic common
among verbal abusers:

http://www.drug-addiction-family-recovery.com/domestic-violence-drug-abuse.html

"Examples of Verbal Abuse:

* Name calling
* Insults
* Ridicule
* Criticism
* Humiliation
* Blame
* Religious/racial put-downs or slurs

"Any of these may be done is such a way as to appear to be a joke. If
the abused person does not find them funny then they are abuse and not
a joke. There can be further abuse if the abuser blames the victim for
having no sense of humor.
*****end quote

This has nothing to do with appreciation of humor and everything to do
with verbal abuse masquerading as "humor".

Monica

Gregory Hall

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 11:01:21 AM11/11/09
to
"Monica" <freedom...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:399d66ac-0676-4ba9...@l2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

Did you ever think perhaps they ridicule you for having no sense of humor
because you, indeed, have no sense of humor? Also, you are very clearly so
full of yourself that it's a crying shame.


--
Gregory Hall


Monica

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 11:14:08 AM11/11/09
to
On Nov 11, 11:01 am, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
> "Monica" <freedom_dign...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:399d66ac-0676-4ba9...@l2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > For those who ridicule me for having "no sense of humor" about the
> > unrelenting cyberstalking campaign against me that has been going on
> > for the past 6 months, here is a website that exposes a tactic common
> > among verbal abusers:
>
> >http://www.drug-addiction-family-recovery.com/domestic-violence-drug-...

>
> > "Examples of Verbal Abuse:
>
> >    * Name calling
> >    * Insults
> >    * Ridicule
> >    * Criticism
> >    * Humiliation
> >    * Blame
> >    * Religious/racial put-downs or slurs
>
> > "Any of these may be done is such a way as to appear to be a joke. If
> > the abused person does not find them funny then they are abuse and not
> > a joke. There can be further abuse if the abuser blames the victim for
> > having no sense of humor.
> > *****end quote
>
> > This has nothing to do with appreciation of humor and everything to do
> > with verbal abuse masquerading as "humor".
>
> > Monica
>
> Did you ever think perhaps they ridicule you for having no sense of humor
> because you, indeed, have no sense of humor?  Also, you are very clearly so
> full of yourself that it's a crying shame.
>
> --
> Gregory Hall

No, they ridicule me because I have criticized their pseudotherapies.
You are already outed for the abusive troll that you are, Neal Warren.
I do have a sense of humor and everyone who really knows me knows I
can be quite zany. What I do not appreciate is abuse masquerading as
humor and you are a master at that, Neal Warren.

Gregory Hall

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 11:41:15 AM11/11/09
to
"Monica" <freedom...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e8616a8f-e2bb-4980...@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...


================================================

[REPLY]

See what I mean about your being unrealistically self-centered? Now, you
seem to be claiming you are the arbiter of what is humor and what is abuse.
Sorry, Monica, but you are only one individual and your sensibilities are
not those of everybody else. Get a clue; grow up. One glaring sign of a very
immature personality is the anal retentiveness of putting yourself in charge
of everything.


--
Gregory Hall


Monica

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 12:08:55 PM11/11/09
to
You have a self-confident woman confused with "self centered". Of
course, being the self-admitted sexist that you are, Neal Warren, that
is not surprising that you would attack me with debunked Freudian
pseudoscience. Strange that you would see my standing up for myself as
"putting yourself in charge of everything". People who really know me
know that I am not that way at all. I simply am standing up for
myself, but you don't understand rational self interest at all because
you have no sense of your own self, have no values and appear to have
no life other than being an internet troll who posts only to provoke
people, by your own admission. If you want to seem immature, take a
good, long, hard look in the mirror. And yes, my life and values are
important to me and I do not apologize for that, something you would
not be able to comprehend.

Barbara Schwarz

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 11:27:02 PM11/11/09
to
On Nov 11, 8:41 am, Monica <freedom_dign...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> For those who ridicule me for having "no sense of humor" about the
> unrelenting cyberstalking campaign against me that has been going on
> for the past 6 months, here is a website that exposes a tactic common
> among verbal abusers:
>
> http://www.drug-addiction-family-recovery.com/domestic-violence-drug-...

>
> "Examples of Verbal Abuse:
>
>     * Name calling
>     * Insults
>     * Ridicule
>     * Criticism
>     * Humiliation
>     * Blame
>     * Religious/racial put-downs or slurs
>
> "Any of these may be done is such a way as to appear to be a joke. If
> the abused person does not find them funny then they are abuse and not
> a joke. There can be further abuse if the abuser blames the victim for
> having no sense of humor.
> *****end quote
>
> This has nothing to do with appreciation of humor and everything to do
> with verbal abuse masquerading as "humor".
>
> Monica

I agree with you on that, Monica.

If somebody is constantly provoked, smeared, defamed, attacked,
blamed, humiliated, ridiculed and insulted, she doesn't waste her
humor on such a creep but just hit.

If somebody wants to find out if somebody has a sense of humor, he has
to behave in an humor deserving way.

Barbara Schwarz

Gregory Hall

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 2:18:00 PM11/12/09
to
"Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSc...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:4bfe7b58-6637-4c69...@v30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

Barbara Schwarz


===========================================

[REPLY]

Neither of you are playing with a full deck. Here's why, and I quote:

"Any of these may be done is such a way as to appear to be a joke. If the
abused person does not find them funny then they are abuse and not a joke.
There can be further abuse if the abuser blames the victim for having no
sense of humor."

Just examine how in the preceding statement the victim is God. It's all
about the victim. The victim even gets to decide the definition of a word
because she 'feels' abused. Good grief, how pathetic is that. Little
crybabies yelling abuse and actually believing that their loud yelling makes
it so.

--
Gregory Hall

Gregory Hall

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 2:36:08 PM11/12/09
to
"Monica" <freedom...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bfe6275b-73a4-4344...@h34g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

> You have a self-confident woman confused with "self centered". Of
> course, being the self-admitted sexist that you are, Neal Warren, that
> is not surprising that you would attack me with debunked Freudian
> pseudoscience. Strange that you would see my standing up for myself as
> "putting yourself in charge of everything".

Well, not everything. It's pretty clear you are NOT in charge of thinking
rationally, clearly and logically. What other reason can there be that you
often reply two, three and even four times to one anon stalker taunt? That
says 'self-centered', 'insecure' and 'disorganized' loudly and clearly. It
paints a picture of Monica at the center of the universe, sitting there at
the keyboard with steam coming from her ears and saying to herself, "That
bastard! I'll kill him. How dare he? Oh, I just thought of something I
forgot to say in the first reply to him. He's abusing me so I'll strike back
again and again until I run out of things to say."


> People who really know me
> know that I am not that way at all. I simply am standing up for
> myself,


Balderdash! Standing up for yourself? That's a laugh. You are out of touch
with reality. Some Rube posts nonsense about you on Usenet and you make it
your life's work to rebutt every absurdity. This is delusional behavior at
its best, Monica. It would be one thing if the allegations were believable
but they are clearly just so much buffoonery. Yet you, lacking any sense of
reality, choose to think it is all so damaging to your 'reptutation.'
Sorry, but your own actions damage your reputation far more than his comical
taunts. You are so caught up with yourself and how others might see you that
you fail to understand how insignificant such taunts really are. The only
value they have is in their ability to control you and control you they do.

> but you don't understand rational self interest at all because
> you have no sense of your own self, have no values and appear to have
> no life other than being an internet troll who posts only to provoke
> people, by your own admission. If you want to seem immature, take a
> good, long, hard look in the mirror. And yes, my life and values are
> important to me and I do not apologize for that, something you would
> not be able to comprehend.


Rational self interest? What's rational about acting irrationally by being
preoccupied with comical taunts for an anonymous Usenet stalker. The only
reason he exists at all is because you allow him to exist by your reacting
to him. That you take him seriously proves that you take yourself way too
seriously. When's the last time you laughed at yourself? You allow yourself
to be easily manipulated by somebody teasing you. You paint a picture of
yourself that says "silly girl." You are stuck in a pre-adolescent
developmental stage.

--
Gregory Hall


Barbara loves Marty

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 11:50:08 PM11/12/09
to
On Nov 12, 1:18 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
> "Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSchwarz2...@excite.com> wrote in message
> Gregory Hall- Hide quoted text -
>

Why don't you try to be a nicer person for a change, Neal? It surely
would not be against the bible, wouldn't it?

Your mean and scornful approach does not work with any woman.

Barbara Schwarz

Gregory Hall

unread,
Nov 13, 2009, 2:38:13 PM11/13/09
to
"Barbara loves Marty" <barbaralov...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:74cdc31c-9c37-41fd...@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

Barbara Schwarz

=======================================

[REPLY]

I know, sometimes I am too harsh with my words but that's because I don't
believe in mincing words just to spare the sensibilities of the thin-skinned
and the ignorant. And, I have nothing to lose. If a woman demands that I be
some sort of wimp then how can I respect her? I wouldn't waste my time
chasing after such a pitiful woman in the first place. Any woman I might be
interested in MUST be strong enough to put up with a strong, independent
manly man and fight back like a strong, independent womanly woman - not some
PC wimp, limp-wristed, crybaby type.

My observations concerning how it's gotten so anybody can call themselves a
victim and then have the right to define words to favor their position is a
valid observation and it ought to scare the hell out of you, Barbara. When
the most cowardly and meek among us can control the language to further
their own perceived victimhood then freedom is lost. Believe it.

What I can't believe is they hand out a Ph.D. to somebody like Monica who is
a walking, talking, whining, crying victim. That's how she defines herself
and all her actions scream victimhood. What a crying shame! And, remember
Monica is a human first and a woman second. I am treating her like a human -
not discriminating against her as a woman.


--
Gregory Hall


0 new messages