Every nasty, below the belt bullshit action that the CULT takes comes
back to hit them four fold.
Watching Tom Newton get more and more angry delights me. It means we
are winning.
Every time Nina or Brittany or Angela post 15 theads in a row to push
the good stuff down, just means that they are more desperate and that
they know they are going to lose.
To all the critics, a toast to you all.
We are winning.
The cult is dying.
"The internet was Scientology's Waterloo."
I think that sums it up. Thing is, they WERE good at handling
criticism and critics; when they were few and far between. But because
Anon has taken up this cause, now they have a hundred times the
pressure to keep their image up in spite of all the bad PR.
And for all you Scilon-supporters: Go down any street in any town, and
ask what people who aren't in Scientology think about it. You won't
like the responses.
Maybe, when this big, lumbering troll of a corporation is able to
shift it's tactics, it MIGHT have a chance. Unfortunately, what it
STILL fails to realize, is Anonymous is the internet, and the internet
is it's plaything. Anon can traffic information to more people, faster
than anyone else. That's why it exists. Whether that be true or false
information doesn't matter. But since Scientologists don't act on
their own, and only when they Church tells them too, they're busy
sitting on their hands while Anon is out flyering the world, nearly
every day. And trust me, us NYC anons were out in some form every
weekend at LEAST.
Maybe, MAYBE when you get ONE person to watch the Anonymous: Hate
Crimes DVD, then we'll talk about spreading information.
With all due respect, I disapprove of your conspiracy theories related
to this newsgroup.
Tom is either a troll or a moron. Whatever the case may be, however, he
is not likely to be acting on behalf of the CULT.
Nina, Angela, Trudy, and Bruce have not changed their posting habits in
any significant way. They have slipped out of anti-psych form on
occasion and went all RFW on the group, but they're posting are
more-or-less of the same quantity (and quality) that they have always
been. With the exception of possibly Nina, they do not read this
newsgroup. I'm still of the opinion that it's a scripted task - one
person writes up the cultspew for the week, and the four accounts spew
it as scheduled.
The rest I agree with, however. Every time the "church" pulls their
"fair game" tactics on anonymous protesters, they enrage the public and
thus assure that the protests will continue. If the "church" wanted to
silence the protests, the best way would be to simply not respond at
all, but they can't do that, because of Hubbard's writings.
No conspiracy theories. Its just that the snowball is rolling down
the hill and picking up speed.
Watching it fall apart this fast has been fascinating. It really is
happening. Its so amazing and long overdue.
It makes me want to double up my efforts every time, and it seems to
have that effect on so many people.
Expect big things in the weeks ahead, bigger than we have ever seen.
Hold on, its gonna be a wild ride!
> redco...@gmail.com wrote:
"redcoat" is one of the numerous aliases of a troll that
hangs out here and posts parroted anti-Scientology propaganda.
He/she has obviously never even _seen_ a Scientologist is his/her
life.
>> Why can't they figure it out?
>>
>> Every nasty, below the belt bullshit action that the CULT
>> takes comes back to hit them four fold.
Anyone who refers to the Church of Scientology as "the CULT"
is an anti-Scientology fanatic with mo morals at all.
A malicious sociopath.
Cults are small and secretive and the Church of Scientology
is neither.
>>
>> Watching Tom Newton get more and more angry delights me. It
>> means we are winning.
There you go lying again. You know perfectly well that I am
not a Scientologist and never have been.
I wouldn't join the Church of Scientology if you paid me.
Nor am I getting "more and more angry".
Cowardly, lying bigots like you always anger me.
But not much. You are such pathetic losers that the anger quickly
changes to pity.
>>
>> Every time Nina or Brittany or Angela post 15 theads in a row
>> to push the good stuff down, just means that they are more
>> desperate and that they know they are going to lose.
No it doesn't. Your reasoning is faulty, as usual.
You just don't like anyone posting anything but anti-Scientology
propaganda here.
Too bad.
>>
>> To all the critics, a toast to you all.
>>
>> We are winning.
>>
>> The cult is dying.
Yeh. And Santa Claus is real.
Just because some cowardly little shit hiding behind the Internet
and numerous aliaes says so.
Would you please posts a video on youtube showing you wiping your
own ass without assistance?
I won't believe you can do it until I see the video.
> With all due respect, I disapprove of your conspiracy theories
> related to this newsgroup.
>
> Tom is either a troll or a moron. Whatever the case may be,
> however, he is not likely to be acting on behalf of the CULT.
I am obviously not a moron, but am at least as intelligent
as anyone here.
Neither am I a troll.
Trying to characterize me as one is as dishonest as trying
to characterize the Church of Scientology as a cult or
a criminal organization.
This kind of dishonesty is the rule with anti-Scientology
fanatics, because if they were honest they'd have to find
someone else to harass.
I am one of "Anonymous's" critics.
"Anonymous" and its allies don't like critics.
Isn't that just too bad?
I read the rest of your anti-Scientology propaganda here.
It's dishonest garbage as usual.
You are a disgusting human being, "Jeff".
Utterly without honor or integrity.
The Church of Scientology is doing just fine "Jeff".
If you don't like it, fuck yourself in the orifice
you post from.
Tom
--
The Truth will set you free:
http://www.sethcenter.com
If you're not a Scientologist, then why so serious? Why the huge boner
for them? Just for fun? Or do you defend things like your political
affiliation this viciously? That's like denying the majority in the
House and Senate. It exists, and saying it doesn't won't change too
much. Long story short, methinks thou doth protest to much. ;)
Anon loves critics. Unfortunately, you must be a lazy one, because
ain't nothin' being done on account of your 'criticism'. Like you said
in your post in an anti-Psych group: "When you hate an evil you simply
create another one. ".
Hey Tom, I thought you put me on Killfile?
LOL
In your heart, you know I'm right.
And, that the CULT is dying.
Which is to say, it's perfectly honest.
You really aren't very good at this, are you, Mr. Conner?
For the record, this is the one and only account I have here, check
with Yahoo if you don't believe it.
> > The Truth will set you free:http://www.sethcenter.com
>
> Hey Tom, I thought you put me on Killfile?
>
> LOL
>
> In your heart, you know I'm right.
>
> And, that the CULT is dying.
Didn't you know? Tom/Alan can't killfile anyone, ever. He's
obsessed. .
Tom/Alan is nothing more than a tired, shrill and very sad little
usenet troll. He can't troll anywhere else because he knows he hasn't
got the skills to be a really successful troll. He also labours under
the erroneous assumption that no one killfiles *him*. I only have to
see his silly, childish rantings when he gets quoted by those who I
haven't killfiled. Mind you, that list is very, very short... so I
don't see much of the silly stuff.
He's been trolling for quite some time, in one incarnation or
another. Each time he has another "subject" and over time he grows
more and more shrill, throws about accusations of criminality,
spamming, etc., etc. until he blows a gasket and goes looney for a
bit then he has to run away with his tail between his legs.
Then he'll be back, with another tired line of garbage.... Lather,
rinse, repeat.
He's most certainly not a Scientlogist. They wouldn't touch a nutter
like him with a ten foot pole.
Are you kidding? He's exactly the kind of militant idiot they need
ganging up on people like Mark Bunker yelling "What are your
crimes?!".
They just need to find a new population of his clones they can leech
money from.
Scientology have a long history of using people with mental problems
to do their dirty work. Two out of our three trolls here have severe
mental problems and both are former scientologists. They were quite
happy to use them while they could.
Jean-Luc Barbier
<snip>
> Scientology have a long history of using people with mental
> problems to do their dirty work.
That's complete nonsense.
> Two out of our three trolls here have severe mental problems
> and both are former scientologists.
By "troll" you mean anyone who criticizes "Anonymous".
And we are all quite sane. If we weren't you woudln't be trying
to defame us.
Duh.
Speaking of trolls, why is that your IP doesn't even resolve into
a domain? That's illegal. Never seen that except in the IPs of
spam.
And speaking of trolls, most of "Anonymous" is made up of trolls.
People who hide behind the Internet and multiple fake names and
post abusive things about people and organizations.
Nasty little malicious cowards.
Like you.
> They were quite happy to
> use them while they could.
Once again "Richard Ford" posts a bunch of fantasies and for some
reason known only to him and his therapist, expects to simply
be believed by everyone.
Tom
--
Do not battle wits with idiots, they will drag you down to their level
and beat you with experience!
Jinkii
Same here too.. search for my email or nickname and find me all over
the net. Tom's just such a jackass he clearly does not care if his
"facts" are in fact false. Most of the other anons on here also have
matching accounts at enturb and also some at xenu, some at exscn, etc,
depending on the person and their level of involvement.
Besides all of that, its very easy to tell the difference between a
user using tor protection and someone who is not masking their ip and
consistently posting on their home ip block. He doesn't care about
that. He's right, the rest of the world is wrong.
Oh, and Tom sucks on donkey dong.
Tom,
You are a survivalist, a computer expert, a black magic voodo nut and
an expert on killing people.
Why not simply deal with me?
>Why can't they figure it out?
>
>Every nasty, below the belt bullshit action that the CULT takes comes
>back to hit them four fold.
>
>Watching Tom Newton get more and more angry delights me.
Tom isn't even a Scientologist!
And JKR doesn't really work for OSA.
These guys are pulling your collective "Anonymous" chain and getting
lulz from it.
Not in the sense the term is usually used.
> a computer expert,
Only compared to the average user.
Not compared to a real expert.
> a black magic voodo nut
No. I've never even researched the subject.
Where do you get this crap?
Oh. Sorry. You get it the same place you get
the crap you post about the Church of Scientology
and Scientology: You make it up.
I keep forgetting that I am dealing with sociopaths here.
> and an expert on killing people.
I'm an expert in the martial arts and sciences. That's only a
_small_ part of it.
>
> Why not simply deal with me?
Same reason I don't "deal" with any of the other "Anonymous"
members.
You aren't a threat to me.
You are cowardly little shits who hide behind the Internet and
false names and post abusive garbage.
Something any slow child with their mommy's computer could
do.
You are about as scary as fruit flies.
AND you're Bigfoot's BIGGEST fan!
It's good ol' anonymous Usenet, "Tommy"... where you get to pretend
to be whoever and whatever you want!
But, what you REALLY are is a sad, pathetic loser.
I'm sure you realize that Anon comes HERE to laugh at the shit people
like you, Tom, and any other pro-Scifag spout.
It's humorous. I enjoy it. Please continue.
AMEN!!!
HH
>Why can't they figure it out?
>Every nasty, below the belt bullshit action that the CULT takes comes
>back to hit them four fold.
It's always been that way, ever since ars began.
>Watching Tom Newton
You are him, ya frothing idiot.
---
Still voting Republican? You're a traitor.
>Maybe, MAYBE when you get ONE person to watch the Anonymous: Hate
>Crimes DVD, then we'll talk about spreading information.
Is that DVD online anywhere? I could do with a larf :-)
--
Don't get in front of me.
What the... Oh, shi-
>For the record, this is the one and only account I have here, check
>with Yahoo if you don't believe it.
You don't have to explain yourself to Tom / Alan as it's well known he
accuses others of his own little pecadilloes.
--
The Truth will set you free:
http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/ac/fga.shtml
Tom Newton is Alan Connor.
>Are you kidding? He's exactly the kind of militant idiot they need
>ganging up on people like Mark Bunker yelling "What are your
>crimes?!".
Tom / Alan doesn't have the balls to confront anyone face to face.
--
The Truth will set you free:
http://www.mininova.org/tor/1243006
It's a torrent, though, and there's a chance that cultists are
monitoring the connection. Wear your proxy condom if that's something
you actually give a shit about.
>obscene dog wrote:
Thanks again for posting that link, Jeff.
I've just finished watching the video and believe that anyone who
hasn't studied the Cult would have every right to be concerned with
the infomation contained within it.
I therefore publicly apologise for any disparaging remarks I made
about the de Kalb County Police Department and a certain Lt. Moore.
:-)
Anyone who has any knowledge of the Cult will know that just about
everything in the movie is fabricated by the Cult themselves. Just
think "Operation Freakout".
You'd think that after:
8,139 harrassing or threatening 'phone calls.
3,674,221 malicious e-mails.
141,880,937 web site attacks.
10 acts of vandalism.
22 bomb threats against franchises and members.
8 death threats against members & officials of the Cult.
the Cult would have some evidence to hand over to the local police
departments or the FBI and that all these incidents would not
magically cease after they failed not once, but twice, to stop
Anonymous from protesting in Cult Central.
I bet the next time the Cult throws eggs and hits someone, they'll
call the cops and claim that the anon was stealing the contents of
their egg whilst carrying a bucket of acid and snorting anthrax.
Bat shit crazy Cult is bat shit crazy.