Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Get her OSA! Get Michelle Anne Sterling (Wilson) aka Emma jailed. She h speech!

3 views
Skip to first unread message

noauth

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 12:08:18 AM11/25/09
to

Michelle Sterling

Michelle Sterling alliance with hate group to destroy Free Speech on the
Internet

Recent information received by Religious Freedom Watch shows that
Michelle Anne Sterling, from Melbourne Australia, conspired with the
cyber-hate group Anonymous to DDoS Religious Freedom Watch.

Michelle Sterling and Anonymous succeeded to take RFW down for several
days. She also participated in the DDoS attack of the official
Scientology site.

Michelle Sterling is known to frequent hate chat rooms using the moniker
�emmma�.

The chat log below unequivocally shows Michelle Sterling inciting
Anonymous to commit a criminal act, while telling them that officially
she will not be supporting them. Sterling then persuades Anonymous to
hit Religious Freedom Watch offering her help to do so.

Anonymous then executed the DDoS attack and brought down Religious
Freedom Watch.

Sterling�s IP addresses, and that of her criminal cohorts, were recorded
during the DDoS attack and the information is being turned over to law
enforcement.

Religious Freedom Watch investigates and exposes individuals who breed
racism and anti-religious intolerance through hate speech. If you have
information regarding Michelle Sterling please contact us.

>From chat sessions between Michelle Sterling (emmma) and Anonymous:

[Jan/22/08 - 04:02] * Joins: emmma``
(ex...@desu-14232769.chirn1.vic.optusnet.com.au)
[Jan/22/08 - 04:02] <Croissantman> I am awesome
[Jan/22/08 - 04:02] <Croissantman> nuff said
[Jan/22/08 - 04:02] <Haywire> what is this silence?
[Jan/22/08 - 04:03] <ColonelCockslap> I need a status report
[Jan/22/08 - 04:03] <emmma�> hello anons
[Jan/22/08 - 04:03] <LamontCranston> uh oh, emmma� sounds important
[Jan/22/08 - 04:04] * Quits: torbjorn
(torb...@desu-C7AEF41A.dsl.snantx.swbell.net) (Quit: torbjorn)
[Jan/22/08 - 04:04] <emmma�> not really
[Jan/22/08 - 04:04] <Croissantman> ahahaha
[Jan/22/08 - 04:04] <hinges> hi emmma�
[Jan/22/08 - 04:04] <Croissantman> http://youtube.com/watch?v=EFKaLfs68Sk
[Jan/22/08 - 04:04] <emmma�> hi hinges
[Jan/22/08 - 04:04] <LamontCranston> hey you�re in victoria emma,
interested in IRL raid?
[Jan/22/08 - 04:04] <hinges> emmma�: don�t be afraid if I rape you
[Jan/22/08 - 04:04] <hinges> that�s just the nigger way
[Jan/22/08 - 04:04] <emmma�> i�m the webmaster at ESMB
[Jan/22/08 - 04:04] <James_P_Sylvan> TNB
[Jan/22/08 - 04:05] <hinges> I�m still gonna rape you :)

[Jan/22/08 - 04:10] <ruddkipz> emma you must help us

[Jan/22/08 - 04:12] <emmma�> I�m all for you guys and what you are doing

[Jan/22/08 - 04:15] <Freud> make the motherfuckers regret that they woke
up this morning
[Jan/22/08 - 04:15] <emmma�> It�;s our intenrtion too

[Jan/22/08 - 04:15] <Freud> emmma� well you just got the most powerfull
ally ont he intarweb

[Jan/22/08 - 04:15] <ihatecrayons> but emmma�, if scientology starts
harassing you, you know where to find us
[Jan/22/08 - 04:15] <emmma�> thanks guys

[Jan/22/08 - 04:18] <emmma�> I just want you guyts to know that
PUBLICALLY I can�t support you�

[Jan/22/08 - 06:15] <emmma�> if there is website you guys should hit is
that religious freedom watch site

[Jan/22/08 - 06:18] <emmma�> if you took that down you�d be adored
[Jan/22/08 - 06:18] <Tigor> k
[Jan/22/08 - 06:18] <Tigor> back on the laptop
[Jan/22/08 - 06:19] <emmma�> I�d help with that one!
[Jan/22/08 - 06:19] <emmma�> what do i do?
[Jan/22/08 - 06:19] <Jon> i dont think its owned by scientology

[Jan/22/08 - 06:19] <emmma�> It�s �owned� by Joel Phillips
[Jan/22/08 - 06:19] <UltraNigger> looks like a good target

[Jan/22/08 - 06:20] * Anondelivers is now known as ElBaldo
[Jan/22/08 - 06:20] <ElBaldo> arrest me mtherfckers
[Jan/22/08 - 06:20] * []Kikkoman is now known as Advocate_of_Painful_Death

[Jan/22/08 - 06:20] <emmma�> check the enrty on dave touretzky
[Jan/22/08 - 06:21] <Freud> rewar...@earthlink.net GOATSE THAT EMAIL!!!

[Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Anonz> Setting off Webclaw DDos. Forgot about that�
[Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Levo75> Jesus666
[Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Jesus666> yes
[Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Levo75> Are you well enough informed?
[Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Levo75> Do you have the ddos tools?
[Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Jesus666> yup
[Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Jesus666> yeah lots of tools lol

[Jan/22/08 - 11:57] <Splongcat> I�m preparing for a dDoS on the website.
[Jan/22/08 - 11:57] <Anondelivers> keep DDoSing scientologists
[Jan/22/08 - 11:57] <Anondelivers> we dont have time for all religions

[Jan/22/08 - 12:07] <LOL_WUT> www.religiousfreedomwatch.org - DDoS nao
[Jan/22/08 - 12:07] <PatternKat> IN MY EYTES
[Jan/22/08 - 12:07] <hurpydurp> So, what is happening now, my children
[Jan/22/08 - 12:08] <Anonymoot> I�m using my neighbours wireless

[Jan/22/08 - 12:08] <Splongcat> Attack is starting
[Jan/22/08 - 12:08] <Splongcat> Raid pack is ready
[Jan/22/08 - 12:08] <Splongcat>
http://rapidshare.com/files/85780905/AIDS3.rar.html
[Jan/22/08 - 12:08] <Splongcat> Get it

[Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <jewlion> in b4 teh file is corrupted

[Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <Splongcat> Go for that. we�re nuking down the
morans that think they can bounty us

[Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <Splongcat>
http://rapidshare.com/files/85780905/AIDS3.rar.html

[Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <Splongcat> Go go go
[Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <Splongcat> Destroy attack die
[Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <Splongcat> Everyone
[Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <Splongcat> we dDoS now.
[Jan/22/08 - 12:10] <SuicideUnit3351> WARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!

[Jan/22/08 - 12:11] <Splongcat> We attack now

[Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <Freud>
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/media-newsroom/5000-reward/ its wodn1

[Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <Testicles> aids on religiousfreedomwatch or
scientology?

[Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <hinges> just attack

[Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <Splongcat> Attack
[Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <Interwabs-hero> im attacking without a proxy anyway
[Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <Splongcat> NOW
[Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <Anonymoot> ALREADY DEAD?

[Jan/22/08 - 12:13] <Interwabs-hero> we�re winning
[Jan/22/08 - 12:13] <Splongcat> Nuked.
[Jan/22/08 - 12:13] <LOL_WUT> www.religiousfreedomwatch.org is no moar
[Jan/22/08 - 12:13] <qwerty123> it must stay down

[Jan/22/08 - 12:14] <Splongcat> This is the power of anonymous

[Jan/22/08 - 12:14] <psyop> 100 people DDoSing a host when 70 suffices
means that 30 DDoSers are going to waste

[Jan/22/08 - 12:15] <qwerty123> we nuked them, WIN WIN WIN WIN

[Jan/22/08 - 12:15] <Frankeh> RFW down already?! I lol�d.

[Jan/22/08 - 12:15] <LOL_WUT> it�s down, no matter

[Jan/22/08 - 12:16] <Coopsta> lol religuosfreedom took all of 30 secs to
DDos

[Jan/22/08 - 12:21] <html> The server at www.religiousfreedomwatch.org
is taking too long to respond.

[Jan/22/08 - 12:21] <Splongcat> Someone digg the fact we just nuked it down
[Jan/22/08 - 12:21] <Freud> we are on top

[Jan/22/08 - 12:23] <Splongcat> �Anonymous nukes down the
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/media-newsroom/5000-reward/ website.�

[Jan/22/08 - 12:24] <Frankeh> I�m just going to put this out there, but
I don�t think we should advertise that we are taking out semi-innocent
sites. I mean we want to keep the Diggers on our side. I just don�t
think that will, no matter how cool it was, show us in our best light.

http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/anti-religious-extremists/michelle-sterling/

barbz

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 10:47:56 AM11/25/09
to
noauth wrote:
> Michelle Sterling
>
> Michelle Sterling alliance with hate group to destroy Free Speech on the
> Internet
<<snip>

Yes, we get it. You're just so awfully proud of the new page you made.
Strange that nobody seems to recall that logged convo. Notepad has a lot
of potential, doncha think?

--
xenubarb
Chaplain, ARSCCwdne

A walk down the path of history is crunchy with the crispy corpses of
those who pooh-poohed or ignored the clown car of ridicule when it
pulled-up to the curb.

Stephen Jones

Barbara loves Marty

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 11:02:20 AM11/25/09
to
> (torbj...@desu-C7AEF41A.dsl.snantx.swbell.net) (Quit: torbjorn)
> [Jan/22/08 - 06:21] <Freud> reward5...@earthlink.net GOATSE THAT EMAIL!!!

> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Anonz> Setting off Webclaw DDos. Forgot about that…
> [Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Levo75> Jesus666
> [Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Jesus666> yes
> [Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Levo75> Are you well enough informed?
> [Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Levo75> Do you have the ddos tools?
> [Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Jesus666> yup
> [Jan/22/08 - 10:23] <Jesus666> yeah lots of tools lol
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 11:57] <Splongcat> I’m preparing for a dDoS on the website.
> [Jan/22/08 - 11:57] <Anondelivers> keep DDoSing scientologists
> [Jan/22/08 - 11:57] <Anondelivers> we dont have time for all religions
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:07] <LOL_WUT>www.religiousfreedomwatch.org- DDoS nao

> [Jan/22/08 - 12:07] <PatternKat> IN MY EYTES
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:07] <hurpydurp> So, what is happening now, my children
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:08] <Anonymoot> I’m using my neighbours wireless
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:08] <Splongcat> Attack is starting
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:08] <Splongcat> Raid pack is ready
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:08] <Splongcat>http://rapidshare.com/files/85780905/AIDS3.rar.html
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:08] <Splongcat> Get it
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <jewlion> in b4 teh file is corrupted
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <Splongcat> Go for that. we’re nuking down the
> morans that think they can bounty us
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <Splongcat>http://rapidshare.com/files/85780905/AIDS3.rar.html
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <Splongcat> Go go go
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <Splongcat> Destroy attack die
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <Splongcat> Everyone
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:09] <Splongcat> we dDoS now.
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:10] <SuicideUnit3351> WARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:11] <Splongcat> We attack now
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <Freud>http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/media-newsroom/5000-reward/its wodn1

> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <Testicles> aids on religiousfreedomwatch or
> scientology?
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <hinges> just attack
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <Splongcat> Attack
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <Interwabs-hero> im attacking without a proxy anyway
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <Splongcat> NOW
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:12] <Anonymoot> ALREADY DEAD?
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:13] <Interwabs-hero> we’re winning
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:13] <Splongcat> Nuked.
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:13] <LOL_WUT>www.religiousfreedomwatch.orgis no moar

> [Jan/22/08 - 12:13] <qwerty123> it must stay down
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:14] <Splongcat> This is the power of anonymous
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:14] <psyop> 100 people DDoSing a host when 70 suffices
> means that 30 DDoSers are going to waste
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:15] <qwerty123> we nuked them, WIN WIN WIN WIN
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:15] <Frankeh> RFW down already?! I lol’d.
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:15] <LOL_WUT> it’s down, no matter
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:16] <Coopsta> lol religuosfreedom took all of 30 secs to
> DDos
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:21] <html> The server atwww.religiousfreedomwatch.org
> is taking too long to respond.
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:21] <Splongcat> Someone digg the fact we just nuked it down
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:21] <Freud> we are on top
> …
> [Jan/22/08 - 12:23] <Splongcat> “Anonymous nukes down thehttp://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/media-newsroom/5000-reward/website.
> …

> [Jan/22/08 - 12:24] <Frankeh> I’m just going to put this out there, but
> I don’t think we should advertise that we are taking out semi-innocent
> sites. I mean we want to keep the Diggers on our side. I just don’t
> think that will, no matter how cool it was, show us in our best light.
>
> http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/anti-religious-extremists/michel...

Barbzzzz Babbles Graham wants to indicate that this session never took
place but what she does not mention is that there are ways to document
it to the authorities if it took place.

Michelle Sterling's IP might have to acknowledge it once the
authorities take over. Same goes for Dave Touretzky, if he had
something to do with it and if he did put Ms. Cheap up for that.

If it is correct that she took the RFW off the Internet for some days,
she might go to jail like that Anonymous idiot.

What a hypocrite she is. She runs a forum in which anybody is banned
who posts something else than her view of the world but same time she
does not want to accept that other websites might publish just their
view of the world.

And read this cheap encounter between her and Anonymous. She wrote:
"Don't be afraid if I rape you. " My good, what a woman says something
like that? Is she one who comes with whips and handcuffs to men's
apartments or what?

She corresponds with a guy who calls himself ultranigger and is not
disgusted by this kind of racism.

I am also appalled by Mark Fisher's records (see his pages on the
RFW). Did RFW made it up? I don't think so, he admitted to the media
that he had a website up with dirt like that. Perverts like that never
should have never be hired on staff in Scientology. He has no clue
about ethics.

Michelle apparently is particularly interested to get Dave Touretzky's
site taken down and that is why she looks for illegal methods to do
it. If he can be traced putting her up to it, he might get in serious
legal problems too.

That web encounter says clearly that "Emma" participated in the
criminal act of hacking a website.

What an idiot this woman is.

--


She allows any libel against me on her hate forum and bans posters who
say a fair word about me. She also allows libel and defamation against
others. One day, somebody with money will sue the hell out of her and
than she has to give up smoking as not enough money in prison to pay
her cigarettes.

She lies to anybody saying that her Forum would be that one of Ex-
Scientologists, when in fact Joe Lynn (Zinjifar) never was in
Scientology and that goes also for numerous others of her posters.

Michelle Ryan Sterling aka Emma (who cowardly removed her photo from
ESMB and exchanged it with a cat picture) is indeed anti-free speech
and her forum is nothing but a huge libel and defamation machine.

Barbara Schwarz

Tigger

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 1:27:33 PM11/25/09
to

Lotta Bullshit Goin' On Here!

Looks like RFW is engaging in its usual dirty tricks...MOCKING up
crimes for critics who are very effectively exposing the dark side of
Hubbard's congame not only to the public but to Scientologists.

Emma, bless her soui, started and conducts a very successful message
board, ESMB, which gets a lot of visits and/or posts from ex
Scientologists, some recently out and or who get out after they find
ESMB.

ESMB has surpassed OCMB and Lermanet.
Just checked and right now.....

SERB: 68 posters.....167 guests

OCMB: 2 posters.......35 guests

Lermanet: 0 Posters....2 guests

As for Babbles complaint......ESMB is a moderated forum....people who
disrupt the board are dealt with appropriately. Doesn't matter if
they are critics, ex's, Freezoners, Scientologists...whatever. No
matter who or what you are, if you disobey the rules, you're out.

No need to tell you why Babbles or her sockpuppets can't post
there....you're all smart enough to figure it out.

Tigger

Lawrence

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 1:47:22 PM11/25/09
to

"Tigger" <Tiggeri...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:f7ea8a8d-6be1-49cb...@w19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...

Tigger:

I got out of Scientology WITHOUT ESMB, Lermanet or OCMB.

What is true for one is not true for all and you are overlooking
the facts. Of course I am not in the bleachers rooting "Screw Michelle!"
I wouldn't, I don't even know the lady.

But the evidence against her looks pretty bad.

Are you trying to say that *everything* that is posted to RFW is lies?

RFW Is not allowed to tell the truth if they want?

Weren't you the one that came here to this newsgroup a while
back and claimed that you had not freedom of speech on OCMB?

--
Read "The Diary Of A Scientologist"

http://mysite.verizon.net/toomajan/

Larry

Lawrence

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 2:07:55 PM11/25/09
to

"Lawrence" <xxxxx...@xxxxx.xxx> wrote in message
news:4b0d7bca$1...@news2.lightlink.com...

Tigger:

Plus, Dimitry Guzner who is from right here in New Jersey,
just a few towns away from me:

http://tinyurl.com/yf8d4qp

had to pay the Church of Scientology almost $40,000.00 in
damages for his DDOS actions and he is only 19. Michelle claims
to be a veteran at this kind of stuff.

I don't like to see people who claim to others to be valid
critics of a corrupt organization get in trouble, but
the law is the law even if you and me don't like it.

Lawrence

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 2:22:43 PM11/25/09
to

"Lawrence" <xxxxx...@xxxxx.xxx> wrote in message
news:4b0d809b$1...@news2.lightlink.com...

Tiggeer:

And to top it all off, they did it through hacking a neighbor's modem.

Tigger

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 3:26:50 PM11/25/09
to
On Nov 25, 12:47 pm, "Lawrence" <xxxxxxx...@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> "Tigger" <Tiggerinthe...@webtv.net> wrote in message

Geeseh Larry. Not everything is about you.
I was talking about ESMB and people who post or visit there. IF THE
SHOE DOESN'T FIT, DON'T WEAR IT.

>
> But the evidence against her looks pretty bad.
>

Hey the evidence against Paulette cooper looked REALLY bad, but it was
a frame up.

> Are you trying to say that *everything* that is posted to RFW is lies?

What is posted on their "enemiees" page is either lies, distorted
truth or half-truths.
I'm pretty sure the pictures are even distorted to make people look
crazy.

And I AM SAYING that they are lying about Emma hacking anything.
Boy, don't be so gullible.

>
> RFW Is not allowed to tell the truth if they want?

Sure they can. But just beause they mock up some "evidence" or get
somebody to testify so and so did such and such.....DOES NOT MEAN it's
the TRUTH.

Hell, they had some looneybin declare that the executive director of
OLD CAN was a topless dancer. What a hoot. Cynthia Kisser was a
great lady, but she was flat as a pancake in the upper story.

What about all those past lives....do you honestly believe those?
One thing Scientology can do is brainwash the brainwashed into
thinking lies are truth.


Freedom of Speech does not mean freedom to LIE.


> Weren't you the one that came here to this newsgroup a while
> back and claimed that you had not freedom of speech on OCMB?

Could be. But I wasn't telling lies. I was sick and tired of a
bullygang badmouthing me and other posters.

Tigger


>
> --
> Read "The Diary Of A Scientologist"
>
> http://mysite.verizon.net/toomajan/
>

> Larry- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Lawrence

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 3:37:23 PM11/25/09
to

"Tigger" <Tiggeri...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:f2e4ef71-abaa-42cc...@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

Don't expect me to bad mouthing you, because I won't be,
but, I try to keep to myself about a lot of these things, not
because I am afraid, but because I just don't want my life
associated with places like RFW or OSA goons that hide
in people's elevator shafts and wait for them to come home.

Barbara loves Marty

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 3:44:52 PM11/25/09
to

My name is not Babbles, and I do not waste my time to post on forums
that are run and controlled by cheap former infiltrators of
Scientology.

I object against any negative control and that is also why I do not
post on WWF despite some said that "I should join the fun" over there,
because control of free speech in all those forums is not my kind of
fun. That is for cultists as Michelle and Shirely who are no
independent individuals as I am.

Take a good look at Michelle Anne Sterling (Wilson), she doesn't
deserve an intelligent poster as me posting there. Would she ban me? I
strongly assume that she would because I know of one at least one
polite Scientologist who did nothing wrong but did not kiss up to her.

Why would I want to post under the control of such a cheap woman?

Shirely Jean Wilson (Tigger) is known for her lies and that she blamed
them on me and others. I ignore her since I heard how old she is. I
don't want to be blamed on her stroke that she might get by posting
lies and hatred on a constant basis.

Or she might be arrested and can share a cell with Michelle Sterling.

Barbara Schwarz

Barbara loves Marty

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 3:56:41 PM11/25/09
to
On Nov 25, 12:47 pm, "Lawrence" <xxxxxxx...@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> "Tigger" <Tiggerinthe...@webtv.net> wrote in message

I have to agree with you this time, Larry. The evidence against
Michelle looks bad. I strongly assume that the RFW knows how to compel
her ISP to acknowledge that she was involved in that bad chat and that
is all a judge might need to know to throw the books at her.

One if these guys was just sentenced to one year of prison.

Michelle Sterling also has so much libel and defamation on her forum
for which she is responsible that harmed people might sue her in the
future. The world is full of liars and libelers and that woman is so
stupid and provides a forum for these lies and the libel.

After all these years, neither Michelle nor Shirely got that OSA is
monitoring chat sessions. They are such fools and deserve all the
legal troubles that they can get into.

Barbara Schwarz


--

Lawrence

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 4:39:33 PM11/25/09
to

"Barbara loves Marty" <barbaralov...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4c4934c-3c70-4f50...@l2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

That was my real only thing about that is that they did this
right out in the open in a chat room and somebody in the chat
room took it all down and gave it to whoever.

So, for a moderator of an international forum that I have read in
this newsgroup only that Michelle claims to be, that is rather
bad webmaster ethics.

Some people believe they are famous for trying to hurt some
people and they are in a way, but not always a good one.

Barbara loves Marty

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 4:49:19 PM11/25/09
to
On Nov 25, 3:39 pm, "Lawrence" <xxxxxxx...@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> "Barbara loves Marty" <barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:a4c4934c-3c70-4f50...@l2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> Larry- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

People should convince through arguments, Larry. If somebody goes
after the free speech of people (as Shirely did go after mine and
Anonymous and Michelle after the free speech of the C of S or the RFW)
it just shows that the people who want to cut the free speech off have
no good arguments. Otherwise they would not work with such methods but
rather try convince through their arguments.

Let the truth prevail, those who speak the truth will be those who are
standing at the end and the others will be in hiding or convicted.

Cutting somebody's right to free speech or to his or her or their
website is not just unlawful and unconstitutional, it is the ultimate
act of cowardism.

Barbara Schwarz

Gregory Hall

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 5:12:20 PM11/25/09
to
"Barbara loves Marty" <barbaralov...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:78f43f64-90bc-498d...@f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

Barbara Schwarz

===============================================

[REPLY]

Sometimes you are such a blatant liar, Barbara.

1) you have tried to cut off the free speech of many people by having them
arrested and thrown in jail for alleged libel and defamation which you have
yet to prove.

2) you constantly change the subject lines in a selfish attempt to limit the
free speech of the original author

3) you often support those who support censorship, Monica Pignotti, for
example

Three strikes and you're out, Barbara.


--
Gregory Hall

4)


Monica Pignotti

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 5:38:13 PM11/25/09
to
On Nov 25, 5:12 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
> "Barbara loves Marty" <barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:78f43f64-90bc-498d...@f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

You're the one who's lying, Neal. In the US, people don't get thrown
in jail for libel and defamation. They might for stalking, though. And
no, it is not "censorship" to have libelous, defamatory and material
that constitutes cyberstalking deleted. Freedom of speech doesn't
cover those areas. People who own websites have every right to decide
what is and is not acceptable for that website. Again, that is not
"censorship". It is the right of private individuals to have on their
websites what they see fit to and it is the right people have to be
protected from libel and defamation.


Tigger

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 5:50:57 PM11/25/09
to
On Nov 25, 4:12 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
>> "Barbara loves Marty" <barbaralovesmarty
>wrote:

(snip)

> [REPLY]
>
> Sometimes you are such a blatant liar, Barbara.
>
> 1) you have tried to cut off the free speech of many people by having them
> arrested and thrown in jail for alleged libel and defamation which you have
> yet to prove.
>
> 2) you constantly change the subject lines in a selfish attempt to limit the
> free speech of the original author
>
> 3) you often support those who support censorship, Monica Pignotti, for
> example
>
> Three strikes and you're out, Barbara.
>
> --
> Gregory Hall
>

LOL....Yeah, the lady doth protest too much,
doesn't she?

Tigger

Barbara loves Marty

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 6:08:21 PM11/25/09
to
> protected from libel and defamation.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

That is correct, Monica, he blames others on what he is doing.

Barbara Schwarz

Tigger

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 7:15:26 PM11/25/09
to
On Nov 25, 4:38 pm, Monica Pignotti <pigno...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> protected from libel and defamation.-

Ahem, Monica,

In case you don't know it, you could post the same thing to and about
Barbara Schwarz.

Tigger

Gregory Hall

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 7:26:57 PM11/25/09
to
"Tigger" <Tiggeri...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:a6224f9f-194e-46f3...@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...


Oh, why don't you two Lesbos get a room . . .

--
Gregory Hall


Gregory Hall

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 7:33:22 PM11/25/09
to
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
news:3ah7hi....@news.alt.net...

Oops! I should slow down. I thought you'd written Amen! As in being on
Monica's side. (actually that wouldn't be hard to do, considering the size
of her - half the places you stand in the world you would be on one side or
the other of hers. ;-)

Anyway, I take it back because with the Ahem! It makes all the difference in
the world. But, Ahem! probably won't get Monica's attention. With her thick
skull it would probably take a David Miscavige slap upside her head to wake
her up.

--
Gregory Hall


John

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 12:25:30 AM11/26/09
to

"barbz" <xenu...@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:XkcPm.49312$Zu5....@newsfe24.iad...

> noauth wrote:
>> Michelle Sterling
>>
>> Michelle Sterling alliance with hate group to destroy Free Speech on the
>> Internet
> <<snip>
>
> Yes, we get it. You're just so awfully proud of the new page you made.
> Strange that nobody seems to recall that logged convo. Notepad has a lot
> of potential, doncha think?
>

Mmm. I was talking to Elvis the other night. I have the logs to prove it.


Tigger

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:22:01 AM11/26/09
to
On Nov 25, 11:25 pm, "John" <j...@junk.com> wrote:
> "barbz" <xenub...@netscape.net> wrote in message

Mmmm. I can top that. I was talking to Abe Lincoln the other night
and we were plotting how to win Bush's War.... I've got the e-mails
AND a picture of Abe in Wings and halo sitting on a cloud to prove
it. :O)

Tigger

Barbara loves Marty

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 5:37:03 PM11/26/09
to
Michelle Anne Sterling admitted on her hate forum that she was the
Emma in that chat that the RFW webbed. She is dumb, not thinking that
OSA monitors her activities. It may now all depends on the prosecutor
and the judge but as the C of S already succeeded with jailing one
Anon for similar crimes, the RFW might have an easy case to get ANON
again and with them, dumb Michelle.

A judge might order her ISP to provide all logs of her postings and
chats and even e-mails and they will look for any crime committed by
Ms. Michelle Anti-Free-Speech.

Criminal activites are criminal activities. Just a complete idiot and
criminal hacks website. Smart and skilled people rather try to
convince with words than trying to cut others off.

Barbara Schwarz

This is Michelle posted on her hate, libel and defamation forum
yesterday:

Emma
Member


Default Re: ESMB mod newest addition to RFW....
It looks unnatural because they completely butchered the log, trying
to make it look like something it isn't.

I was there, and I did say I supported Anon, but the context was that
I had to do it quietly because of my daughter and the relationship
with her "still in" father. They've left that out of course.

I never took part in any ddossing. I left the chat WAY before anything
like that happened. I had no part in it because first and foremost I
wouldn't have a clue what to do. If my IP had been logged as part of
the attack I'd have heard about it by now.

I did say that it would be great to see the RFW site gone but I really
can't believe that Anonymous would do that because *I* asked them to.
I mean .. seriously??
Ex Scientologist

Voltaire's Child

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 11:36:55 AM11/27/09
to

"Tigger" <Tiggeri...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:f7ea8a8d-6be1-49cb...@w19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...

Plus, one of the people in that chatroom goes by the moniker "Ihatecrayons".
Right there that's proof- PROOF, I tell you!! Criminals abound.

Excuse me...I'm laughing too hard...

C

0 new messages