Monica Pignotti: Under a Microsope?
George Orwell
What's the explanation?
Did Larry Sarner divide by zero?
Did Linda Rosa lie to the bankruptcy trustee?
Did Jean Mercer censor something vital?
Did Charly D. Miller drink on the job again?
Or, is it possible the "Ted Bundy Handout" is truly fake?
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
Monica Pignotti
Only your pseudoscientific "microscope" full of red herrings swimming
around. The real issue is interventions that are being promoted for
vulnerable children that I have serious concerns about because they
recommend so-called "therapeutic holds" illustrated in self published
books that I do not see have evidence for safety and efficacy. My
concern is about interventions taking prematurely to the media that do
not have randomized clinical trials to support their safety and
efficacy. I have searched for randomized clinical trials to support
claims of 80% improvement and other claims being made but have found
none, nor have they been produced when I requested them. That is the
real issue that has nothing to do with any of the red herrings you are
apparently staying up all night to invent and post.
Gregory Hall
news:d81ead7132d1ce72...@mixmaster.it...
> If Monica were to take a close look at a recently restored site, she'd
> find that certain things have gone missing.
>
> What's the explanation?
>
> Did Larry Sarner divide by zero?
>
> Did Linda Rosa lie to the bankruptcy trustee?
>
> Did Jean Mercer censor something vital?
>
> Did Charly D. Miller drink on the job again?
>
> Or, is it possible the "Ted Bundy Handout" is truly fake?
>
Under a microscope? Bwahahhahahahahah. Monica wouldn't fit under the HUBBLE
SPACE TELESCOPE, let alone a microscope!
--
Gregory Hall