> Hash: SHA1

> Ted Crammer (ted_cram...@hotmail.com) wrote:

>     About charge...

> >The determination, effort, and feeling of trying to reach something

> >which cannot be reached or withdraw from something which cannot be

> >withdrawn from.

>      Correct.

>      Adore would take this one step further.

>      Adore considers the world an arcade game that we created, wrote

> the programs and jumped into with full knowing willing cause and full

> awareness of the consequences.  Life is like a computer game

> programmer playing his own game.

>      Now as long as the player retains awareness that he wrote the

> game, he will be willing to play, win and lose, because he knows that

> playing is the point, not winning or losing.  In fact if he wins too

> often he will rewrite the code to make it harder, and if he loses too

> often he will again rewrite the code to make it easier.  He wants

> optimum PLAY.

>      Thus he can engage in desires and losses, reaches and withdraws

> without getting serious about the game because he knows he made the

> game, and he knows he chose to play it, and he knows he can change it,

> and he knows he can leave it at any time.

>      But somewhere along the line the programmer decides to thrown his

> awareness of Sovereignty away, and suddenly he is in this game with

> out his own OK, without any ability to leave the game, and without the

> ability to change the game and with the threat hanging over his head

> that if he loses the game he will never play again.

>      Since the basic desire is to PLAY, THIS loss he takes very

> seriously and starts to build up charge again.

>      So Adore would add that desire, reach and withdraw are for PLAY.

> As long as the guy can play, he may not care so much who wrote the

> game or how he got into it, but the moment he conceives that his

> playing the game is dependant on his winning the game, FOREVER, then

> he starts to build up charge about losing the game.

>      Oh Jontu...  Listen closely, more evidence for you....

>      The issue here, according to Adore, is that a being is capable of

> creating the illusion of conditions or losses for himself that he

> could never, would never and should never, create in actuality.

>      Thus although a being could not, would not, and should not create

> a game in which he dies forever period, he can, would and should

> create the illusion that he is in such a game.  (Well at least once in

> a while because its there to be created!).

>      Even though the illusion is possible, the actuality is

> impossible, so the thetan is quite safe doing this.  He can't die, nor

> can he go to hell forever as it violates the fundamental nature of the

> being, who can only get stuck in WHILES for a while, and also violates

> his fundamental sovereign desire which is to PLAY forever, not die

> forever nor suffer forever.

>      Basically beings created the world, then nothing can exist that

> violates the being's fundamental desires.  No being can fundamentally

> desire suffering forever or dying forever, so ergo, suffering forever

> or dying forever can not exist.

>      But the being can engage in the illusion that he will die forever

> or go to hell forever.

>      So once you have a thetan playing an illusion that violates his

> basic Sovereignty, he will develope charge every moment of the game.

>      He has a must play, don't want to play on the game, so he

> plays with resentment and resistence.

>      Once he realizes its is just a game, and was created by his own

> Sovereignty which can not, would not and should not ever be lost, then

> games no longer generate charge no matter what happens.  Except of

> course if the being wants to generate charge and throw it around to

> impress the masses etc or make it part of the game.

>      (Charge is basically physical, emotional, mental or spiritual

> electrical force that can be piled up into a solid mass that blocks

> perception and ability on subjects the being no longer wants to have

> impinge on him.)

>      The basic reach and withdraw then is for fundamental Sovereignty

> and its desires.  The whole of creation is the reaching out of

> Sovereign Desire from potential to manifest.  Thus what is manifested

> can not be other than what Sovereign Desire wanted.

>      In this temporal time stream that desire is to PLAY, neither to

> win nor to lose.

>      Once the ablity to play is itself made into a game, then losing

> that game loses the ability to play any game and that violates

> sovereign desire, and THUS WHETHER OR NOT HE LOSES OR WINS THE GAME OF

> PLAYING GAMES, that creates charge forever for free.

>      Well until the WHILE ends.

>      "Charge releases as *HUMOR* and dies off as a wave into Eternal

> Omni Awesome Peace."

>     Slosh, slosh, slosh, slosh....

>     Homer

> ================ http://www.clearing.org ====================

> Mon Nov 12 03:06:02 EST 2012

> ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore123.memo

> Send mail to arch...@lightlink.com saying help

> ================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================

> Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.

> Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.

> Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.

> Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but

> not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

> Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)

> iD8DBQFQoK3qURT1lqxE3HERAlLtAJ9CM6q+U7FSwTQGAmIImIqKad8pHQCdECMJ

> /1AsZHP/ZPNxwBXl4op98c4=

> =Sazy

> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

> --

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Homer Wilson Smith   Clean Air, Clear Water,    Art Matrix - Lightlink

> (607) 277-0959       A Green Earth, and Peace,  Internet, Ithaca NY

> ho...@lightlink.com  Is that too much to ask?   http://www.lightlink.com