coffee
...@aussieisp.com wrote:
> Dave Touretzky wrote:
>> Scientology hates the Internet because it's full of "copyright
>> terrorists" -- Helena Kobrin's ridiculous phrase.
> Hubbard originated the name 'XENU' and words like 'enturbulation'
> and yet critics of the Co$ still promote the Church by using these
> very same words. The critics are giving validitity to Hubbard's
> claims. Why do they do this?
Because part of being human involves playing with language. It's fun.
Now, you might THINK we do it for the reason you give, but you're wrong.
We don't promote Scientology by using its jargon, we use the jargon
because it's amusing, and other critics also recognize and understand
the buzz words. Even The Simpsons have used the word 'enturbulate' on
one of their shows for the laugh factor. And before you bother telling
us the voice of Bart is a Scientologist, don't bother. The Movementarian
episode managed to take a slap at several cults at one time.
I suspect a large number of them
> are deep hidden 'scientologists' working hand-in-hand with
> Scientology to either positively promote or negatively promote
> the Church on the Internet. Knowing that the Internet, is a public
> soup of low toned, ARCX beings, and using communication levels
> corresponding with those as you would find on the 'HUBBARD
> CHART OF HUMAN EVALUATION'.
Oh, that's mighty nice of you. Discarding the millions of netizens as
low-toned, ARCX beings (talk about slinging the jargon,hah) must make
you feel real superior about yourself. Heh. Self delusion is another
human trait. Indulge at your own risk.
This game that scientologists
> and to a lesser extent the Official Church of Scientology use on the
> Internet, are all part-and-parcel of their technological understandings
> of the human mind, and human spirit, the tone scale, the comm
> line, Dianetics 55. You can promote Scientology in one of two ways,
> either pro or anti; either way if you are using terms that
> scientologists
> use you are promoting it in some way.
That's a load of baloney, as well as a contradiction. I think you need
to word-clear "promote."
What an interesting exercise,
> and experiment you are running here on the Internet, you pseudo-
> church-critics. Even up to defending ECT and drugging patients with
> neurotoxins. They understand that 'destructive' communications are
> the only type of communication lines that low-toned beings work with,
> can appreciate, and have any ARC with.
You sad little bean! Disagreeing with the Scientology shills who post
anti-psych crap isn't the same as defending psychiatry. Only a
thoroughly indoctrinated cult member would think that makes sense. But
then, like yourself, they're stuck in the 50s view of psychiatry shown
you by Hubbard. Visions of patients strapped down for shock treatments
dance in your indoctrinated head, and you think you're "thinking for
yourself" when you spew the Scientology view.
Ever wonder if people are laughing at you, or with you?
--
"I'm for the separation of church and hate."
Barb
Chaplain, ARSCC(wdne)
xenub...@netscape.net
