There is a book called "Hollywood and Whine: The Snippy, Snotty, and Scandalous Things Stars Say About Each Other" (by Boze Hadleigh) and the following quote is attributed to Roman Polanski (though it does not give the source of this quote):
====================
I was not so eager to direct John Travolta, but the deal was an attractive one . . . . We did have a huge fight. There is no need for details. But it began when I dared to criticize his religion, or cult."
--Roman Polanski on Scientologist Travolta
====================
Presumably this was when Travolta was supposed to do a film called "The Double" with Polanski, but then Travolta had a big disagreement with Polanski about the film and walked off the set and then wound up getting sued by the movie studio for breach of contract (which was later settled out of court).
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:54:01 -0700, Sue M. <batchi...@NOSPAM.cox.net> wrote: >There is a book called "Hollywood and Whine: The Snippy, Snotty, and >Scandalous Things Stars Say About Each Other" (by Boze Hadleigh) and >the following quote is attributed to Roman Polanski (though it does >not give the source of this quote): >==================== >I was not so eager to direct John Travolta, but the deal was an >attractive one . . . . We did have a huge fight. There is no need for >details. But it began when I dared to criticize his religion, or >cult." >--Roman Polanski on Scientologist Travolta
Polanski had good cause to distrust the Scientology cult, after self-professed Scientologist Charles Manson and his brainwashed "Family" murdered his wife Sharon Tate and others.
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 07:25:30 GMT, ptsc <p...@nowhere.com> wrote: >On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:54:01 -0700, Sue M. <batchi...@NOSPAM.cox.net> wrote:
>>There is a book called "Hollywood and Whine: The Snippy, Snotty, and >>Scandalous Things Stars Say About Each Other" (by Boze Hadleigh) and >>the following quote is attributed to Roman Polanski (though it does >>not give the source of this quote):
>>====================
>>I was not so eager to direct John Travolta, but the deal was an >>attractive one . . . . We did have a huge fight. There is no need for >>details. But it began when I dared to criticize his religion, or >>cult."
>>--Roman Polanski on Scientologist Travolta
>Polanski had good cause to distrust the Scientology cult, after self-professed >Scientologist Charles Manson and his brainwashed "Family" murdered his wife >Sharon Tate and others.
http://members.tripod.com/~VanessaWest/manson.html snip> On August 9, a Manson hit team raided the home of movie director Roman Polanski, slaughtering Polanski's wife - pregnant actress Sharon Tate - and four of her guests: Abigail Folger, Jay Sebring, Voytek Frykowski, and Steven Parent. The following night, Manson's "creepy crawlers" killed and mutilated another couple, Leno and Rosemary LaBianca, in their Los Angeles home." {end}
My father once received a haircut from Jay Sebring himself back in the early 60's. I remember him saying before going that Jay had promised to make what was remaining of his more than balding head look like a "forest" once Jay got through with him. If memory serves, Jay charged a whopping fifty dollars for a personal cut which would be like having a five hundred dollar haircut today, so my family had our attention on my fathers head to see what this 'wizard of hair' could do to create more croppage, as a cut. When my father arrived home after the cut his head looked like a weaved birds nest in the beginnings that tried to look 60's 'modern' for the Gillette 'upcoming executive', which was anything but him as a conservative businessman from the 1940's generation. My mother saw to it that he never went back again.
I wouldn't be surprised if Jay was a client of my fathers for him to even go in the first place because my Dad wasn't a 'hipster' hanging out in 'hipster' crowds. I never found out if he was a client, but knowing my Dad, he probably was.
Tragic what happened at Tate/LaBianca and I remember the period well, almost as if it were yesterday. I never saw such pitbull determination in the form of Bugliosi to 'get his man' as a prosecutor. The guy was an animal, and still is.
http://members.tripod.com/~VanessaWest/manson.html snip> Jay Sebring - Professional hairstylist and owner of Sebring International, ex-fiance of Sharon Tate, friend of Tate and Polanski. It is believed Sebring and Frykowski struggled with their killers before being subdued: Stabbed 7 times, shot once. 3 of these stab wounds alone, as well as the gunshot wound, were sufficient to cause death. Cause of death: Exsanguination - Sebring literally bled to death."
http://www.cielodrive.com/victims/kummer/ Jay Sebring bio snip> After serving four years in the Navy, Kummer moved to Los Angeles and changed his name to Jay Sebring, taking the name from the famous Florida car race. In California, Sebring developed a unique style of cutting hair, which helped launch the male hair care revolution. He opened one of the first male salons in the United States and quickly made a name for himself. His client list included big Hollywood names such as Warren Beatty, Steve McQueen, and Paul Newman. At Kirk Douglas' request Sebring was hired to design a haircut for the slaves in the movie Spartacus. This added attention brought in a steady flow of contracts from different movie studios. He fit in well in Hollywood; Friends, acquaintances, and clients remembered him as being a kind, thoughtful man with sophisticated taste. He was insecure about things such as his short stature. However it was those insecurities that fueled his attention to style. Whether it was his fashionable clothes or the cars he drove; he always seemed to put time and effort into his appearance. In October of 1960 he became a husband, his wife was a model named Cami, their brief relationship came to an unofficial end when the two separated in August of 1963.
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
>Polanski had good cause to distrust the Scientology cult, after >self-professed >Scientologist Charles Manson and his brainwashed "Family" murdered his wife >Sharon Tate and others.
Charles was a clam? I had no idea, can you provide any more information about this?
Too bad Polanski's a pedophile, or he'd be a pretty swell guy.
epoc...@aol.com (Epoch II) wrote in message <news:20040701175055.10996.00001007@mb-m02.aol.com>... > >Polanski had good cause to distrust the Scientology cult, after > >self-professed > >Scientologist Charles Manson and his brainwashed "Family" murdered his wife > >Sharon Tate and others.
> Charles was a clam? I had no idea, can you provide any more information about > this?
> Too bad Polanski's a pedophile, or he'd be a pretty swell guy.
A pedophile is someone into babies and small children-pre-pubescent. Polanski is not. He fucked a 13 year old, which is wrong, but she was a fully developed, menstruating (not apparently at that time) sexually mature-biologically-female. It's a question of "malum prohibitum" rather than "malum in se". I'm not defending what he did, but it's well known he fled the country because the judge announced, while urinating, that he planned to fuck Polanski over in a big way after he and the DA agreed on an appropriate punishment. Polanski has suffered enough for an episode of bad judgment and everyone but a few fundies and ass-showers knows it.
>epoc...@aol.com (Epoch II) wrote in message <news:20040701175055.10996.00001007@mb-m02.aol.com>... >> >Polanski had good cause to distrust the Scientology cult, after >> >self-professed >> >Scientologist Charles Manson and his brainwashed "Family" murdered his wife >> >Sharon Tate and others.
>> Charles was a clam? I had no idea, can you provide any more information about >> this?
>> Too bad Polanski's a pedophile, or he'd be a pretty swell guy.
> A pedophile is someone into babies and small children-pre-pubescent. >Polanski is not. He fucked a 13 year old, which is wrong, but she was >a fully developed, menstruating (not apparently at that time) sexually >mature-biologically-female. It's a question of "malum prohibitum" >rather than "malum in se". I'm not defending what he did, but it's >well known he fled the country because the judge announced, while >urinating, that he planned to fuck Polanski over in a big way after he >and the DA agreed on an appropriate punishment. Polanski has suffered >enough for an episode of bad judgment and everyone but a few fundies >and ass-showers knows it.
Agreed, and I don't think that Roman will do anything like that again; he has been married to his current wife, actress Emmanuelle Seigner, for about 15 years now and they have two kids and he seems to have a stable, happy family life now.
And the young girl involved in the case, who is now a wife and mother in her late 30s, doesn't seem to have any negative feelings towards Roman, and even wrote an op-ed piece in the LA Times in early 2003 (shortly after Roman's film "The Pianist" received multiple Academy Award moninations) saying people should judge "The Pianist" by the film's merits alone and not by what happened to her 25 years ago (and apparently the Academy members must have taken her advice, since "The Pianist" won three major Oscars, including Roman for Best Director).
On 1 Jul 2004 19:46:43 -0700, larboar...@hotmail.com (Ted Azito) wrote in <b53da461.0407011846.7ea39...@posting.google.com>:
>I'm not defending what he did, but it's >well known he fled the country because the judge announced, while >urinating, that he planned to fuck Polanski over in a big way after he >and the DA agreed on an appropriate punishment.
After Polanski left the US, that judge had to recuse himself... (Polanski had served 40+ days jail for "evaluation") The next judge was Breckenridge, who said he wouldn't sentence him in absentia. Small world!
> >> >Polanski had good cause to distrust the Scientology cult, after > >> >self-professed > >> >Scientologist Charles Manson and his brainwashed "Family" murdered his wife > >> >Sharon Tate and others.
> >> Charles was a clam? I had no idea, can you provide any more information about > >> this?
> >> Too bad Polanski's a pedophile, or he'd be a pretty swell guy.
> > A pedophile is someone into babies and small children-pre-pubescent. > >Polanski is not. He fucked a 13 year old, which is wrong, but she was > >a fully developed, menstruating (not apparently at that time) sexually > >mature-biologically-female. It's a question of "malum prohibitum" > >rather than "malum in se". I'm not defending what he did, but it's > >well known he fled the country because the judge announced, while > >urinating, that he planned to fuck Polanski over in a big way after he > >and the DA agreed on an appropriate punishment. Polanski has suffered > >enough for an episode of bad judgment and everyone but a few fundies > >and ass-showers knows it.
> Agreed, and I don't think that Roman will do anything like that again; > he has been married to his current wife, actress Emmanuelle Seigner, > for about 15 years now and they have two kids and he seems to have a > stable, happy family life now.
> And the young girl involved in the case, who is now a wife and mother > in her late 30s, doesn't seem to have any negative feelings towards > Roman, and even wrote an op-ed piece in the LA Times in early 2003 > (shortly after Roman's film "The Pianist" received multiple Academy > Award moninations) saying people should judge "The Pianist" by the > film's merits alone and not by what happened to her 25 years ago (and > apparently the Academy members must have taken her advice, since "The > Pianist" won three major Oscars, including Roman for Best Director).
I can't answer for the girl Polanski raped and sodomised, but if it were me, after 30 years I'd be wishing it would all go away and leave me alone. If it meant saying publicly that I was over it, then I'd say it. So long as the media stopped dredging it up each time Polanski did something.
He might be happily settled in Europe, but what he did was still a mongrel act.
> > >epoc...@aol.com (Epoch II) wrote in message > <news:20040701175055.10996.00001007@mb-m02.aol.com>... > > >> >Polanski had good cause to distrust the Scientology cult, after > > >> >self-professed > > >> >Scientologist Charles Manson and his brainwashed "Family" murdered his > wife > > >> >Sharon Tate and others.
> > >> Charles was a clam? I had no idea, can you provide any more information > about > > >> this?
> > >> Too bad Polanski's a pedophile, or he'd be a pretty swell guy.
> > > A pedophile is someone into babies and small children-pre-pubescent. > > >Polanski is not. He fucked a 13 year old, which is wrong, but she was > > >a fully developed, menstruating (not apparently at that time) sexually > > >mature-biologically-female. It's a question of "malum prohibitum" > > >rather than "malum in se". I'm not defending what he did, but it's > > >well known he fled the country because the judge announced, while > > >urinating, that he planned to fuck Polanski over in a big way after he > > >and the DA agreed on an appropriate punishment. Polanski has suffered > > >enough for an episode of bad judgment and everyone but a few fundies > > >and ass-showers knows it.
> > Agreed, and I don't think that Roman will do anything like that again; > > he has been married to his current wife, actress Emmanuelle Seigner, > > for about 15 years now and they have two kids and he seems to have a > > stable, happy family life now.
> > And the young girl involved in the case, who is now a wife and mother > > in her late 30s, doesn't seem to have any negative feelings towards > > Roman, and even wrote an op-ed piece in the LA Times in early 2003 > > (shortly after Roman's film "The Pianist" received multiple Academy > > Award moninations) saying people should judge "The Pianist" by the > > film's merits alone and not by what happened to her 25 years ago (and > > apparently the Academy members must have taken her advice, since "The > > Pianist" won three major Oscars, including Roman for Best Director).
<larboar...@hotmail.com> writes: >epoc...@aol.com (Epoch II) wrote in message news:<20040701175055.10996.00001007@ >mb-m02.aol.com>... >> >Polanski had good cause to distrust the Scientology cult, after >> >self-professed >> >Scientologist Charles Manson and his brainwashed "Family" murdered his wife >> >Sharon Tate and others.
>> Charles was a clam? I had no idea, can you provide any more information about >> this?
>> Too bad Polanski's a pedophile, or he'd be a pretty swell guy.
> A pedophile is someone into babies and small children-pre-pubescent. >Polanski is not. He fucked a 13 year old, which is wrong, but she was >a fully developed, menstruating (not apparently at that time) sexually >mature-biologically-female. It's a question of "malum prohibitum" >rather than "malum in se".
Isn't it unfortunate that when someone criticised Scientology over a major matter i.e. one of their members being a multiple killer, that suddenly discussion got (successfully) diverted into "discussing his own crimes" rather than Scientology.
Could someone re-post the basic material on Manson and Scientology, so we can have a discussion on the issue which matters? We seem to have lost our way a bit at the moment. It is arguable how much CofS had to do with Manson or how much he just wormed himself into Scn, but the debate is worth having.
> Isn't it unfortunate that when someone criticised Scientology > over a major matter i.e. one of their members being a multiple > killer, that suddenly discussion got (successfully) diverted > into "discussing his own crimes" rather than Scientology.
Please don't give me that bullshit, I'm not trying to divert the topic like the OSA goons do, I was just bringing it up because it's the first thing that came to my mind. Because while I love all his movies i'm not a big fan of Polanski personally.
I was also wondering about Charles Manson, I didn't know he was a Scientologist...
So, go on, please keep discussing the rest of this story, and if you're going to be suspicious of me Dave, then why don't you tell it to my face what you think about me instead of gossiping?
<epoc...@aol.com> writes: >> Isn't it unfortunate that when someone criticised Scientology >> over a major matter i.e. one of their members being a multiple >> killer, that suddenly discussion got (successfully) diverted >> into "discussing his own crimes" rather than Scientology.
>Please don't give me that bullshit, I'm not trying to divert the topic like the >OSA goons do, I was just bringing it up because it's the first thing that came >to my mind. Because while I love all his movies i'm not a big fan of Polanski >personally.
> I was also wondering about Charles Manson, I didn't know he was a >Scientologist...
>So, go on, please keep discussing the rest of this story, and if you're going >to be suspicious of me Dave, then why don't you tell it to my face what you >think about me instead of gossiping?
More on Charles Manson as a Scientologist. Something the cult wants to hide...
------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- Scientology From: ?Anti-Cult? - www.users.wineasy.se/noname/ <The.Galactic.Federatio n...@ThePentagon.com> Subject: More on Charles Manson as a Scientologist. Something the cult wants to hide... Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 00:57:35 +0100 Message-ID: <ijidato3ujffcfi7ce4028s1f6vqmhbk60@ARSCC.Sweden.Dep.OSA.Sur veillance>
From: http://www.shipbrook.com/jeff/CoS/docs/manson.html GS-C Comm GS-G 22 June 70 D/G Intell U.S. Dear Mary Sue, COMPLIANCE REPORT RE: MANSON, BRUCE DAVIS There have been numerous new developments on this case and they are as follows.
An individual by the name of Steve Grogen appeared on our lines (PM). I received word that he had made statements that he was a member of Mansons family and therefore started some intell.
action, which at first consisted of talking to the girls he had been in contact with. By the time I had finished talking to them Grogen had been put away in jail for car theft. In spite of numerous efforts on our part it was impossible to get together with him. I had the girl he seemed to be most in comm with, journey out to the valley on four different occasions to talk to him and in spite of our best efforts he was never made available. He was either "in court" or the jail was undergoing extensive re- decoration. Of course we did not want it known that a member of The Church was trying to see him. At the same time this was going on we received word that two members of the Manson Family "squeeky Frome" and "Sandy Goode" were staying at the Viking Motel on 3rd and Alverado which is in close proximity to the org. We made no efforts to contactthem.
On 18 June 80 the following report was received by me.
Report of interview with Raul Morales, Re: Charles Manson.
According to Raul: Raul arrived in prison on McNeil Island, Washington in 1962 and became a cell mate of Lafayette Raimer allegedly a trained Scientology auditor (about Level I in Raul's estimation) and was introduced to Scientology at that time. Raimer was auditing in prison at that time and in one 10 man cell had managed to gather a group of about 7, all in Scientology. Charles Manson entered later and studied, did TRO etc. along with his cell-mates and received approximately 150 hours of auditing from Raimer. Processes used were CCH's, Help processes (Who have you helped-Who have you not helped) and other Dichotomy processes (Rauls terms, such as What can you confront, what would you rather not confront), Havingness (Such as "What can you have?" "Look around and find something you can have. Look around and find something you're not in." Rainer kept recor records of his auditing. Manson got super- energetic & flipped out when he'd been audited and would, for a time, talk about nothing but Scientology to the extent that people avoided his company. After a while, however, Manson was screaming to get away from his auditor (in Raul's opinion, he'd been severely over-run or something). He eventually managed to get put in solitary confi- nement to get away from his auditor. Eventually prison officials got suspicious of the groups strange activities and broke up the group. Subsequently, Raul was released from the prison in 1965.
Raimer's wife was in training here at the L.A. Org in 1965-66; she had disconnected from Raimer. Raul just found out yesterday that another friend, Marvin White, later sent Manson books (after the Scientology group was broken up) on hypnotism and black magic,
From: ?Anti-Cult? - www.users.wineasy.se/noname/ <The.Galactic.Federatio n...@ThePentagon.com> Subject: More on Charles Manson as a Scientologist. Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 01:00:42 +0100 Message-ID: <iridatkrcibd5shf489g2p87p8jn021...@ARSCC.Sweden.Dep.OSA.Sur veillance> From: http://www.b-org.demon.nl/scn/deaths/uwc/helter.txt From Bugliosi HELTER SKELTER -- page 647 On November 21, 1969, the bodies of James Sharp, fiften, and Dorren Gaul, nineteen, were found in an alley in downtown Los Angeles. The two teen-agers had been killed elsewhere with a long-bladed kniife or bayonet, then dumped there. Each had been stabbed over fifty times. Ramparts division Leiutenant Earl Deemer investigated the Sharp-Gaul murders, as did Los Angeles Times reporter Cohen. Although the two men felt there was a good possibility that a Familty member was involved in the slayings, the murders remain unsolved.
Both James Sharp and Doreen Gaul were Scientologists, the latter a Scientology "clear" who had been residing in a Church of Scientology house. According to unconfirmed reports, Doreen Gaul was a former girl friend of Manson Family member Bruce Davis, himself an ex-Scientologist.
Davis' whereabouts at the times of the murders of Sharp, Gaul and Jane Doe 59 are not known. He disappeared shortly after being questioned in connection with the death of Zero.
On December 1, 1969, Joel Dean Pugh, husband of Family member Sandy Good, was found with his throat slit in a London hotel room. As noted, local police ruled the death a suicide. On learning of Pugh's demise, Inyo County DA Frank Fowles made official inquiries, specifically asking Interpol to check visas to detrmine if one Bruce Davis was in England at the time.
Scotland Yard replied as follows: "It has been established that Davis is recorded as embarking at London airport for the United States of America on 25th April 1969 while holding United States passport 612 2568. At this time he gave his address as Dormer Cottage, Felbridge, Surrey. This address is owned by the Scientology Movement and houses followers of this organization." From Paulette Cooper THE SCANDAL OF SCIENTOLOGY p105 Another bit of publicity that the Scientologists are probably not too pleased with concerns the murder of three people in Los Angeles. Two were Scientologists.
According to *The New York Post*, all three were brutal- ly beaten, ritualistically stabbed, had their right eyes cut out, and were dumped 100 yards from a Scientology commune. One of the girls, Miss Doreen Gaul, nine- teen, who came from New York to study Scientology, was naked except for a strand of Indian beads. The boy, James Sharpe was fifteen years old. The third was un- identified. Doreen Gaul's father allegedly told a *New York Post* reporter that she had lately become disen- chanted with Scientology.
She was not the only one. For the past fourteen years, John McMasters, the first Scientology clear, ap- pears to have been groomed by Hubbard to take his place when he dies. McMasters recently wrote a letter to Hubbard, and sent copies to "suppressives" and Scientology enemies. Although McMasters declared that "I shall never withdraw my allegiance to Ron or Scientology" he announced that he was leaving Hub- bard's ships to spread Scientology in Africa, because of his "horror at what such people on the Sea Org could do to mankind." He criticized Hubbard and Scientology for their "savage and vicious ethics" and seemed partic- ularly disturbed over the death of the three Los Angeles teen-agers. Their deaths may have partially precipitated McMasters' decision to dissociate himself from certain aspects of Scientology. "Somehow we are violating our basic ethics for such things to happen to us," he wrote. "These last two ghastly murders of our students, one of whom is a clear, need never have hap- pened if we hadn't been mocking up [making] enemies so solidly." - Page 105
> Isn't it unfortunate that when someone criticised Scientology > over a major matter i.e. one of their members being a multiple > killer, that suddenly discussion got (successfully) diverted > into "discussing his own crimes" rather than Scientology.
> Could someone re-post the basic material on Manson and Scientology, > so we can have a discussion on the issue which matters? We seem to > have lost our way a bit at the moment. It is arguable how much CofS > had to do with Manson or how much he just wormed himself into Scn, > but the debate is worth having.
I found this post in Deja News which has a number of excerpts from the book "Helter Skelter" (the book by Vincent Bugliosi, the DA who prosecuted Manson and other members of Manson's "Family" for the Tate-LaBianca murders) and some other books. The post is available at:
But briefly, according to the "Helter Skelter" book, Manson got involved with Scn whlle in prison about 1961 (?), being introduced to it by another prisoner. Manson claimed to have reached its (then) highest level, "theta clear". Manson follower Charles "Tex" Watson claimed that in the summer of 1968, he and Manson went to an org in Los Angeles and Manson asked the receptionist "What do you do after 'clear'?", and when the receptionist couldn't tell him anything he hadn't already done, he left.
Another Manson follower, Bruce Davis, also was involved in Scn. Incidentally, in November 1969, two Scientologists were found murdered in an alley in Los Angeles; the case apparently hasn't been solved, but one of the victims was an ex-girlfriend of Davis. Davis disappeared shortly after (after being questioned about another murder).
Hopefully some other critics can post some more information about the Scn/Manson connection (or maybe repost some of their ARS posts about Manson).
epoc...@aol.com (Epoch II) wrote in message <news:20040714213722.25456.00001514@mb-m29.aol.com>... > > Isn't it unfortunate that when someone criticised Scientology > > over a major matter i.e. one of their members being a multiple > > killer, that suddenly discussion got (successfully) diverted > > into "discussing his own crimes" rather than Scientology.
> Please don't give me that bullshit, I'm not trying to divert the topic like the > OSA goons do, I was just bringing it up because it's the first thing that came > to my mind. Because while I love all his movies i'm not a big fan of Polanski > personally.
> I was also wondering about Charles Manson, I didn't know he was a > Scientologist...
He wasn't. He got a few auditing sessions from another inmate and former infiltrator of Scientology. The SEGNPMSS organized that. They want the wildest and most lawless people to be associated with Scientology, to ruin its reputation, that is why they set such things up.
Manson is nothing but a remote controlled SEGNPMSSrobot and actually everything a Scientologist is NOT.
> So, go on, please keep discussing the rest of this story, and if you're going > to be suspicious of me Dave, then why don't you tell it to my face what you > think about me instead of gossiping?