Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Wikileaks: "Scientology cult unlawful imprisonment RPF order 3434RB"

58 views
Skip to first unread message

R. Hill

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 12:04:39 PM4/11/08
to

R. Hill

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 1:41:30 PM4/11/08
to
On Apr 11, 12:04 pm, "R. Hill" <rh...@xenu-directory.net> wrote:
> http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Scientology_cult_unlawful_imprisonment_...

>
> Thanks to whomever leaked that.

Excerpt below.

The Church of Scientology claims that the RPF is entirely voluntary.
But if someone refuses to go in the RPF, he is thrown out of the Sea
Org., not a pleasant thing when they have no savings, because having
dedicated a part of their life working with virtually no earning. Add
to that that they are presented a "freeloader" invoice if they wish to
leave.

Further, they are asked to write down their "sins" before being
expelled from the Sea Org... What exactly is the use of these
confessions, considering that the person is expelled? Rhetorical
question, the answer is blackmail.

So there is little choice for Sea Org. staff assigned to the RPF, but
to go to the RPF.

Point 1: Interesting to note that you can enter the RPF without any
"condition" assigned... No worry though, the Man-at-Arm will assign
you one. Let's just hope he likes you.

Point 2: "Has no liberties." Why is it necessary to have such a rule,
if people go in the RPF "voluntarily"?

Point 3: "Any travel between buildings is accompanied by a Security
Guard." Why do RPFers need to be accompanied by a security guard when
moving from one building to the other? Are RPFers so *dangerous* that
they need to be under guard? Who fears them? Tom Cruise? David
Miscavige?

Point 6: So much for Church of Scientology's claims that they respect
family values. Imagine that, you will not be allowed to see you spouse
and/or child if you are not *producing* enough. Who decides you
*produce* enough? David Miscavige? The Man-at-Arm that might not like
your face?

And if you are magnanimously granted the luxury of meeting your family
members, note that you are not allowed to talk whatever you want with
your family members. What happens to "think freely, to talk freely, to
write freely their own opinions" found in the Scientology creed?
Rhetorical question: The Scientology creed is just for nice public
face.

Point 9: "RPF mess," "messing": What is that? Or is it "mass"?

Point 14: "May not enter staff or public areas." Yeah, that could
upset Tom Cruise, all those people dressed as prisoners working to
make sure he enjoys his stay.

Point 16, 17: A Sea Org. staffer can "choose" to do the RPF, or be
dismissed, in which case, "is to sign a confession of his crimes
before leaving the Base." Scientology *knows* you have crimes if you
are not fit enough for being a Scientology staffer. So write them
down, will use them if you speak out against us.

Point 20: "May not have with them in the RPF _ANY_ drugs." Note the
emphasis on "ANY," would that include prescription drugs, medical
drugs? Insulin?

"May not have with them... radios, TV." Yeah, the RPFers could become
aware that there are people protesting Scientology worldwide because
their inalienable rights are trampled.

=====
[...]

_PERSONAL RESTRICTIONS AND PENALTIES_

The RPF member:

1. Enters the RPF in a condition not higher than Liability (to the Sea
Org). (If none assigned, it is to be determined by RPF MAA.) On
entering he signs HPL 31 May 1976 LEGAL FORM - DECLARATION OF RPF
MEMBERS. He is to work up to Normal on the First Dynamic (including
full Danger Handling under Section MAA).

His last action in the RPF is the last step of his Liability Formula
on the 3rd Dynamic and when completed, he rejoins the crew in Non-
Existence.

2. Has no Liberties.

3. Is restricted to FH at all times except when on authorized work
cycles in other Flag Buildings. Any travel between buildings is
accompanied by a Security Guard. Additionally each week one RPF member
as authorized by RPF MAA and Security Force MAA, may make necessary
purchases for RPF members (e.g. toothpaste, deodorant, etc.),
accompanied on foot by a Security Guard at the convenience of the
Security Guard.

4. Receives 1/4 pay until released, then 1/2 pay.

5. Is berthed only in a space which is isolated from the rest and is
only for RPF. RPF berthing, messing and Tech area must conform with
local regulations such as berthing, fire, health and safety
regulations, etc., but without violating other restrictions or the
intention of the RPF.

6. May not speak to or approach Flag staff or public or outside public
unless spoken to or as per further communication rules authorized by
LRH Pare[?] Comm or where an impoliteness to the raw public would be
incurred.

In order to allow time for creation of the 2D of a married RPF member
that is upstat he/she may spend one night a week with his/her spouse
in a space authorized by Berthing I/C and as scheduled by RPF MAA. If
both are in the RPF both must be upstat and get RPF MAA OK.

Some contact with a spouse or child is permitted during the RPFer's
meal time or securing time once daily if the RPFer is upstat. All the
above is providing no discussion of case or condition occurs and
providing there is _NO_ enturbulation whatsoever from or between
either. In the case of a pre-school child contact is allowed more than
once daily during mealtimes, and the schedule is to be worked out with
the RPF MAA.

Penalties for upset or violations of these allowances are a per points
15 and 16 below. All RPF _DOs_ and _DON'Ts_ apply during time spent
with child or spouse (i.e. uniform is worn, schedules kept, no comm
rules with spouse's friends, etc.) Note: The spouse or child of the
RPFer must originate to the RPF MAA the wish to speak or have time
with the RPFer.

7. Has rank or rating suspended and lowered two ranks or ratings
automatically on assignment to RPF.

8. Has meals available after Flag crew have been served.

9. Is part of RPF mess[?] to be in special section on the 2nd floor of
the garage.

RPF messes must be organized per Messing FOs, but RPF Mess Presidents
are not part of the Mess Presidents' Meetings. RPF Mess Presidents may
form a meeting but the Chief Steward is not obliged to act on their
requests, but is expected to perform all reasonable actions to provide
adequate nutrition.

10. May not attend crew parties or hold their own. May not attend
other crew or public events except by arrangement.

11. Is denied Canteen privileges, but may use vending machines on
ground floor breezeway.

12. Receives Mimeo's OODs and such FCOs, EOs, FOs, HCOBs, EDs, etc. as
may directly apply to the RPF and its Tech Unit.

13. Has no uniforms except for boiler suit or approved cleaning
uniform.

14. May not enter staff or public areas, or elevator except when on
assigned cleaning duties in those areas, under a Section Leader. MAY
NOT USE THE SWIMMING POOL AT ANY TIME. Service elevator is used only.

15. Must suffer additional time in the RPF if sentenced to it for
violations of regulations, failure to produce, excessive natter,
refusal to come clean or any other offense, as assigned by the RPF
Bosun or MAA or by duly convened Court or Comm Ev.

16. In case of refusal to abide by the policies of the RPF or to
accept the authority and directions of seniors, it is to be handled by
Comm Ev in which the person if found guilty is given the choice to
make it on his own determinism or to be dismissed from the Sea Org.

17. And if dismissed from the Sea Org is to sign a confession of his
crimes before leaving the Base.

18. Has no laundry service and the RPF must do its own laundry once
issued.

19. Has to use bath or W/C facilities only as designated by CO Area
Estates.

20. May not have with them in the RPF _ANY_ drugs or alcoholic
beverages, radios, TV, taped music, musical instruments, chess games
or any such entertainment or luxury, or consume such when on
authorized visits to spouse or child.

21. A minimum number of circulating fans is allowed at RPF expense for
Tech area and sleeping area where there is _NO_ other circulation of
air easily available.

The above PERSONAL RESTRICTIONS AND PENALTIES TO BE ENFORCED BY THE
RPF BOSUN AND RPF MAA.

[...]
=====

Android Cat

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 2:37:53 PM4/11/08
to
R. Hill wrote:

> 4. Receives 1/4 pay until released, then 1/2 pay.

They keep using that word. I do not think it means what they think it
means.

If it was actual pay from employment, there would be all sort of paperwork
connected with it, social security contributions, etc.

> 9. Is part of RPF mess[?] to be in special section on the 2nd floor of
> the garage.

Mess hall, cafeteria or canteen. Where they eat their meals. Are their
bunks also on the 2nd floor of the garage?

--
Ron of that ilk.

Ronnie Marks

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 4:30:47 PM4/11/08
to
Sometime near Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:04:39 -0700 (PDT), "R. Hill"
<rh...@xenu-directory.net> may have written:


The telling point here is: "Must ***SUFFER*** additional time in RPF"

And the Kult keeps saying people go to the RPF because the love the Kult so
much. Why then, is it considered a punishment that you have to stay there if
you don't behave exactly right?
--
Truth is something you stumble into when you think you're going some place else.
- Jerry Garcia

Out_Of_The_Dark

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 5:00:35 PM4/11/08
to
> Thanks to whomever leaked that.

ditto. I notice there is no time alloted for being with ones family.

The RPF is equivilent to being in a prisoner of war camp.

mary

Kim P

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 6:00:28 PM4/11/08
to

Purchases? With what money? 1/4 pay (if they even get it) won't buy
much....


>
> 4. Receives 1/4 pay until released, then 1/2 pay.
>
> 5. Is berthed only in a space which is isolated from the rest and is
> only for RPF. RPF berthing, messing and Tech area must conform with
> local regulations such as berthing, fire, health and safety
> regulations, etc., but without violating other restrictions or the
> intention of the RPF.

HA- I bet the RPF regs are more important than little things like WOG law


>
> 6. May not speak to or approach Flag staff or public or outside public
> unless spoken to or as per further communication rules authorized by
> LRH Pare[?] Comm or where an impoliteness to the raw public would be
> incurred.

Ah - let's not have any bad PR all part of KSW


>
> In order to allow time for creation of the 2D of a married RPF member
> that is upstat he/she may spend one night a week with his/her spouse
> in a space authorized by Berthing I/C and as scheduled by RPF MAA. If
> both are in the RPF both must be upstat and get RPF MAA OK.

OOOOOO 1 night a week with your spouse - as if


>
> Some contact with a spouse or child is permitted during the RPFer's
> meal time or securing time once daily if the RPFer is upstat.

Who decides who is upstat? How quick can that change

All the
> above is providing no discussion of case or condition occurs and
> providing there is _NO_ enturbulation whatsoever from or between
> either. In the case of a pre-school child contact is allowed more than
> once daily during mealtimes, and the schedule is to be worked out with
> the RPF MAA.

Enturbulation - such a wonderful meaningless word - during mealtimes
-how long is that? 10 mins?


>
> Penalties for upset or violations of these allowances are a per points
> 15 and 16 below. All RPF _DOs_ and _DON'Ts_ apply during time spent
> with child or spouse (i.e. uniform is worn, schedules kept, no comm
> rules with spouse's friends, etc.) Note: The spouse or child of the
> RPFer must originate to the RPF MAA the wish to speak or have time
> with the RPFer.

A spouse or child has to ask PERMISSION to speak to their spouse/parent?
And this is not a cult? I do not need anyone's permission to speak to my
spouse or child or vice versa and no one has the right to interfere with
our communication. Little wonder so many marriages are destroyed by
scientology.


>
> 7. Has rank or rating suspended and lowered two ranks or ratings
> automatically on assignment to RPF.
>
> 8. Has meals available after Flag crew have been served.

How nice - left overs.


>
> 9. Is part of RPF mess[?] to be in special section on the 2nd floor of
> the garage.

Eating in the garage - how incredibly sanitary and lovely

>
> RPF messes must be organized per Messing FOs, but RPF Mess Presidents
> are not part of the Mess Presidents' Meetings. RPF Mess Presidents may
> form a meeting but the Chief Steward is not obliged to act on their
> requests, but is expected to perform all reasonable actions to provide
> adequate nutrition.

As long as they feel like it


>
> 10. May not attend crew parties or hold their own. May not attend
> other crew or public events except by arrangement.

Heaven forbid that anyone actually have FUN.


>
> 11. Is denied Canteen privileges, but may use vending machines on
> ground floor breezeway.

Loverly - vending food is so very fresh and nutritious - and hardly
costs anything at all.

>
> 13. Has no uniforms except for boiler suit or approved cleaning
> uniform.

Another control mechanism - fear,intimidation, and public humiliation.


>
> 14. May not enter staff or public areas, or elevator except when on
> assigned cleaning duties in those areas, under a Section Leader. MAY
> NOT USE THE SWIMMING POOL AT ANY TIME. Service elevator is used only.

Can't let any one see the poor downstat creatures- lets all pretend it
is not happening...


>
> 15. Must suffer additional time in the RPF if sentenced to it for
> violations of regulations, failure to produce, excessive natter,
> refusal to come clean or any other offense, as assigned by the RPF
> Bosun or MAA or by duly convened Court or Comm Ev.

Excdessive natter? So no one can complain or talk to anyone about
anything - another control mechanism - isolation


>
> 16. In case of refusal to abide by the policies of the RPF or to
> accept the authority and directions of seniors, it is to be handled by
> Comm Ev in which the person if found guilty is given the choice to
> make it on his own determinism or to be dismissed from the Sea Org.

Fear and intimidation - you will lose your eternity...


>
> 17. And if dismissed from the Sea Org is to sign a confession of his
> crimes before leaving the Base.

MUST sign a confession? MUST - that is ridiculous - what is it they are
supposed to confess? that scientology no longer is something they are
interested in? That scientology is a scam? The FORCED confessions are
another layer of intimidation and fear.


>
> 18. Has no laundry service and the RPF must do its own laundry once
> issued.

>
> 19. Has to use bath or W/C facilities only as designated by CO Area
> Estates.

If they feel like allowing them access?


>
> 20. May not have with them in the RPF _ANY_ drugs or alcoholic
> beverages, radios, TV, taped music, musical instruments, chess games
> or any such entertainment or luxury, or consume such when on
> authorized visits to spouse or child.

Heaven forbid the human being be allowed to be HUMAN and do something
fun and relaxing.... what if the person NEEDS medication is it denied them?


>
> 21. A minimum number of circulating fans is allowed at RPF expense for
> Tech area and sleeping area where there is _NO_ other circulation of
> air easily available.

A minimum number? 1 or 2? Only IF there is NO other circulation
available - like 1 tiny window? Who decides what is adequate? The MAA
who probably likes making lives miserable and is getting their rocks of
seeing others suffer...


>
> The above PERSONAL RESTRICTIONS AND PENALTIES TO BE ENFORCED BY THE
> RPF BOSUN AND RPF MAA.
>
> [...]
> =====

The entire RPF situation is just disgusting and inhuman and inhumane and
serves no other purpose than to destroy free will,free thought,and the
ability to think for oneself. There is no justification for this sort of
treatment of human beings. It needs to be stopped

Kim P

hu...@mailinator.com

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 8:26:41 PM4/11/08
to
Please explain how this practice is religious.

Gerry Armstrong

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 9:38:33 PM4/11/08
to
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:41:30 -0700 (PDT), "R. Hill"
<rh...@xenu-directory.net> wrote:

>On Apr 11, 12:04 pm, "R. Hill" <rh...@xenu-directory.net> wrote:
>> http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Scientology_cult_unlawful_imprisonment_...
>>
>> Thanks to whomever leaked that.
>
>Excerpt below.
>
>The Church of Scientology claims that the RPF is entirely voluntary.
>But if someone refuses to go in the RPF, he is thrown out of the Sea
>Org., not a pleasant thing when they have no savings, because having
>dedicated a part of their life working with virtually no earning. Add
>to that that they are presented a "freeloader" invoice if they wish to
>leave.

I'm not sure the RPF's RPF Flag Order, or Flag Condition Order, has
been published yet. But the RPF's RPF totally and grotesquely belies
the voluntariness claim. If a person volunteered to go to the RPF, or
asked to be assigned to the RPF (because of course being on post in a
Scientology org could also be hell to be escaped), that person was
given the RPF's RPF. The first RPF's RPF assignment, I believe, by
Hubbard himself, was Joan Moreau in 1974.

Also, if a person was on the RPF and wanted to leave, that person
could get the RPF's RPF.

An old post on this subject:
http://www.clambake.org/entheta/entheta/1stpersn/gerry/1997-012.html

>
>Further, they are asked to write down their "sins" before being
>expelled from the Sea Org... What exactly is the use of these
>confessions, considering that the person is expelled? Rhetorical
>question, the answer is blackmail.

This is really why people tried to blow.

GO Intel's answer to that was to get RPFers to sign lists of crimes
that were culled from their auditing files even if they weren't
demanding to leave. The GO Intel person I dealt with in this matter
was Chuck Ohl.

>
>So there is little choice for Sea Org. staff assigned to the RPF, but
>to go to the RPF.
>
>Point 1: Interesting to note that you can enter the RPF without any
>"condition" assigned...

Yes, but not higher than Liability.

>No worry though, the Man-at-Arm will assign
>you one. Let's just hope he likes you.
>
>Point 2: "Has no liberties." Why is it necessary to have such a rule,
>if people go in the RPF "voluntarily"?
>
>Point 3: "Any travel between buildings is accompanied by a Security
>Guard." Why do RPFers need to be accompanied by a security guard when
>moving from one building to the other? Are RPFers so *dangerous* that
>they need to be under guard? Who fears them? Tom Cruise? David
>Miscavige?

It's part of the second class Scientologist degradation trip. Cruise
and Miscavige love it. Sadists aren't really afraid their captives,
unless the captives escape.

>
>Point 6: So much for Church of Scientology's claims that they respect
>family values. Imagine that, you will not be allowed to see you spouse
>and/or child if you are not *producing* enough. Who decides you
>*produce* enough? David Miscavige? The Man-at-Arm that might not like
>your face?

Yes. I was the MAA at the first Gilman Hotsprings RPF. Master at Arms.

MASTER AT ARMS, 1. this is a naval
term used in the Sea Org and is equivalent
(but senior) to the Ethics Officer in a Scientology
church. (BTB 12 Apr 72R) 2. Sea
Org Ethics Officer. (FO 2780) 3. Master at
Arms, Dept 3, is inspections and reports,
statistics, investigation, ethics, legal, ethics
files, brig, assisted by Master at Arms mates
and contains as well the statistics of the ship
or flotilla which are the product of the Communications
Division. (FO 1109) 4. Staff
Master at Arms has the duties of: (1) inspection:
inspecting for compliance of Flag orders
and work orders aboard the ships and
assigning conditions necessary for false reports
and non-compliance. (2) security checking
wherever applicable. (3) interrogation
of personnel on failed missions. (FO 637) 5.
(Gung-Ho Group) keeps order at meetings
and ejects people trying to break the group
up. He also inspects things and reports on
them to the Communications Executive who
in turn informs the President or other group
members. (HCO PL 2 Dec 68) Abbr. MAA.

Scientology Admin Dictionary

>
>And if you are magnanimously granted the luxury of meeting your family
>members, note that you are not allowed to talk whatever you want with
>your family members. What happens to "think freely, to talk freely, to
>write freely their own opinions" found in the Scientology creed?
>Rhetorical question: The Scientology creed is just for nice public
>face.

And the nice public face is to make evil look good.

>
>Point 9: "RPF mess," "messing": What is that? Or is it "mass"?

MESS, a nautical term used to designate an
organized group which eats together on a
ship or shore base or SO org. Messes consist
of 8 to 20 (optimum is about 10) persons of
similar rank or function. WO 2586)

Scientology Admin Dictionary

>
>Point 14: "May not enter staff or public areas." Yeah, that could
>upset Tom Cruise, all those people dressed as prisoners working to
>make sure he enjoys his stay.

That's very true. The idea given the RPFers was that we, being evil,
restimulated these first class Scientologists. Same thing around
Hubbard. The CMO made sure RPFers weren't in his space because we
restimulated him. We could slave day and night on his homes or his
grounds though.

>
>Point 16, 17: A Sea Org. staffer can "choose" to do the RPF, or be
>dismissed, in which case, "is to sign a confession of his crimes
>before leaving the Base." Scientology *knows* you have crimes if you
>are not fit enough for being a Scientology staffer. So write them
>down, will use them if you speak out against us.

I believe that had I not escaped from the cult (not from the RPF but
from regular crew) I would have been locked up, and Miscavige would
have done anything to neutralize me. I was certain enough at that
point about Hubbard's and the organization's criminal nature that I
would have refused to sign anything, refused to be sec checked, and
refused to be neutralized. I believe I would have fought back, and I
believe Miscavige would have had killed me.

See:
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/eo-24-addl-rpf-duty.html

Note the date of this RPF Additional Duty Ethics Order, August 17,
1976, and the date of the first revision of Flag Order 3434, August
21, 1976.

>
>16. In case of refusal to abide by the policies of the RPF or to
>accept the authority and directions of seniors, it is to be handled by
>Comm Ev in which the person if found guilty is given the choice to
>make it on his own determinism or to be dismissed from the Sea Org.
>
>17. And if dismissed from the Sea Org is to sign a confession of his
>crimes before leaving the Base.
>
>18. Has no laundry service and the RPF must do its own laundry once
>issued.
>
>19. Has to use bath or W/C facilities only as designated by CO Area
>Estates.
>
>20. May not have with them in the RPF _ANY_ drugs or alcoholic
>beverages, radios, TV, taped music, musical instruments, chess games
>or any such entertainment or luxury, or consume such when on
>authorized visits to spouse or child.
>
>21. A minimum number of circulating fans is allowed at RPF expense for
>Tech area and sleeping area where there is _NO_ other circulation of
>air easily available.
>
>The above PERSONAL RESTRICTIONS AND PENALTIES TO BE ENFORCED BY THE
>RPF BOSUN AND RPF MAA.
>
>[...]
>=====

Many are called but few are Bosun. I was that enforcer twice. Plus the
MAA enforcer.

© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org

Out_Of_The_Dark

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 10:59:07 PM4/11/08
to
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

bump

Gerry Armstrong

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 11:22:20 PM4/11/08
to
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:26:41 -0700 (PDT), hu...@mailinator.com wrote:

>Please explain how this practice is religious.

Because the US Federal Government says so. Or rather, the Government
says that a totalitarian cult, which enslaves and imprisons people and
deprives them of their other basic human rights, only has to itself
determine to be religious, and poof, it's a religion. Enslaving and
imprisoning people and in any way depriving them of their rights then
become protected religious expression or ceremonies or sacraments.

See "Religious is as religious says, not does."
http://carolineletkeman.org/sp/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1507&Itemid=240

The US Federal Government, for antisocial reasons, made a strategic
decision that is a blunder. It's like invading Iraq.

Now what does the US do? So far, the powers that be have decided to
stay the course and do what is necessary to make the blunder not be a
blunder. That requires beastifying the enemy with every breath and
redefining words like mad. The US allows Scientology to beastify and
obliterate its enemies in order to make the blunder of calling the
cult a religion not be a blunder. The US has slaughtered countless
beastified enemies and had its own troops slaughtered to make its
invasion blunder not be, or appear to be, a blunder.

The US, like Scientology, might be getting to the point that it feels,
or pretends to feel, so secure in its power that it doesn't care if
the rest of the world sees its blunders as blunders. Actually I think
that both the US Federal Government and Scientology with all their
programs and operations to make their blunders not end up being
blunders have only made their blunders more blunderful.

© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org

obscene dog

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 11:23:06 PM4/11/08
to

One of the most vile documents I have ever read.

Shame on you, scientology.

--

Don't get in front of me.
What the... Oh, shi-

Psyborgue

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 11:38:32 PM4/11/08
to
On Apr 11, 6:04 pm, "R. Hill" <rh...@xenu-directory.net> wrote:
> http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Scientology_cult_unlawful_imprisonment_...

>
> Thanks to whomever leaked that.

sounds exactly like the cult I was in.

Sex was controlled like described
Speech was controlled as described... this was called "bans"
personal items restricted, where to eat, what to eat...
must confess...

It's sick, sick, behavior modification / re-education (a-la China)...

What kind of church does this?

Sam Buckland

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 11:40:31 PM4/11/08
to

Pretty much all of 'em. And don't forget the "tithing".

Psyborgue

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 11:58:07 PM4/11/08
to

Not by force. _Churches_ do not *enforce* penalties... Churches do
not have security services. Churches do not have forced labor.
Churches do not have guns and barbed wire. Churches do not have
sniper nests. With cults, it's either "you accept this and do as we
say, or we destroy your life... and the best part is you'll blame
yourself since you pulled it in". Churches do not do that.

Sure there is always the "you can leave" illusion... but it's like
saying "you can leave, but there is a desert out there, filled with
snakes and the most horrible things imaginable and you will never
survive", and you've been conditioned to believe it, even if it's not
true. An unreasonable choice is no choice at all. Call a spade a
spade, it's a prison camp designed to break people down and build them
up as thralls to a sick, sadistic cult run by a sociopathic piece of
shit who i... _hope_ with all my soul gets fucked up the ass by the
entire cell block when he hits the federal pen... and it WILL happen.
I've seen cults fall before, and those on top are hounded for the rest
of their lives by those who hurt them:

http://fornits.com/smf/index.php?topic=15507.msg196684#msg196684 <--
what a bunch of Straight Inc. survivors did to Miller Newton.

Expect *much* worse than that.

Karma is a motherfucker.


disclaimer: i do not endorse violence... bla bla bla.. fuck you.

0 new messages