Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Search engines attacks

1 view
Skip to first unread message

roger gonnet

unread,
Feb 11, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/11/00
to
Just a question:

would you be surprized to learn that hyperspam attacks toward search
engines, eBay, Amazon and others could be the testing of a new spam sort
from our pet tchudch?

--
roger gonnet
le secticide - l'anti-scientologie
<http://home.worldnet.fr/gonnet>
et en Suisse:
<http://www.home.ch/~spaw1736/sciento-vs-internet.

RUPROSE

unread,
Feb 11, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/11/00
to
>would you be surprized to learn that hyperspam attacks toward search
>engines, eBay, Amazon and others could be the testing of a new spam sort

There is certainly something going on. My posts are repeatedly not showing up
on the A R S for more then a minute or so. IF THEY DO AT ALL the last few days

RUproSE

©Anti-Cult® - www.users.wineasy.se/noname/

unread,
Feb 11, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/11/00
to
On 11 Feb 2000 09:57:44 GMT.
In Message-ID: <20000211045744...@ng-fz1.aol.com>
rup...@aol.com (RUPROSE).
From: AOL http://www.aol.com.
Wrote on the subject: Re: Search engines attacks:

God damned fucked shit. Your articles shows up fine. If you can't see
them more than once, then that is due to the fact that your AOL shit is
set up not to show already read articles, or something to that effect.

Let me repeat this once again: YOUR ARTCICLES PROPAGATES WITHOUT ANY
PROBLEM TO A.R.S. IF YOU CAN'T SEE THEM, CONFIGURE YOUR AOL EXCUSE FOR A
NEWS READER.

Sten-Arne, yours in Xenu.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
++++++++++++ SACRED CULT SCRIPTURE +++++++++++++

Some people who are deaf or blind might simply have a cluster
sitting on a nerve, and it's gone on so many years the nerve
atrophies. Catatonics may be suffering from this sort of knockout.
This explains why a tactile process works - you run tactile on the
bed, etc, after an accident and the guy comes out of it.

--NED for OTs Series 22
LRH;dm:kjm
Copyright (c) 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
---------------------------------------------------------------------
******* Body thetans? We don't need no stinking Body Thetans! *******
*********** http://www.users.wineasy.se/noname/index.htm ************
IRC #Scientology JavaChat http://www.users.wineasy.se/noname/irc.html
* Multimedia: http://www.users.wineasy.se/noname/multimed/index.htm *
**** Public PGP key: http://www.users.wineasy.se/noname/pgp.htm *****
******** The.Galacti...@ThePentagon.com (Anti-Cult) ********
---------------------------------------------------------------------


Cornelius Krasel

unread,
Feb 11, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/11/00
to
roger gonnet <sect...@worldnet.fr> wrote:
> would you be surprized to learn that hyperspam attacks toward search
> engines, eBay, Amazon and others could be the testing of a new spam sort
> from our pet tchudch?

Yes. I don't see any reason why the Church of Scientology might be
interested in attacking Amazon or eBay.

--Cornelius.

--
/* Cornelius Krasel, U Wuerzburg, Dept. of Pharmacology, Versbacher Str. 9 */
/* D-97078 Wuerzburg, Germany email: pha...@rzbox.uni-wuerzburg.de SP4 */
/* "Science is the game we play with God to find out what His rules are." */

RUPROSE

unread,
Feb 11, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/11/00
to
>I don't see any reason why the Church of Scientology might be
>interested in attacking Amazon or eBay.
>
>--Cornelius.

Maybe, the reason for the hacking could be an effort to show control?
Logical no, but have you found Co$ to be complete logic?

RUproSE

Jim Byrd

unread,
Feb 11, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/11/00
to
In article <i15188...@wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de>, Cornelius says...

>
>roger gonnet <sect...@worldnet.fr> wrote:
>> would you be surprized to learn that hyperspam attacks toward search
>> engines, eBay, Amazon and others could be the testing of a new spam sort
>> from our pet tchudch?
>
>Yes. I don't see any reason why the Church of Scientology might be

>interested in attacking Amazon or eBay.

Unless they were short-selling the stocks.


Lronscam

unread,
Feb 11, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/11/00
to
The addy of rup...@aol.com, In article ID
<20000211103358...@ng-fk1.aol.com>, On or about 11 Feb
2000 15:33:58 GMT,

RUPROSE says...

>>I don't see any reason why the Church of Scientology might be
>>interested in attacking Amazon or eBay.
>>

>>--Cornelius.
>
>Maybe, the reason for the hacking could be an effort to show control?
>Logical no, but have you found Co$ to be complete logic?
>
>RUproSE
>

Ruprose, your articles aren't showing up on any news server. This here
is not a message, actually. It is only an implant station on AOL and
what you see as a response is not really real. It is, in fact, unreal.

Your belief in your messages not being propagated properly are as
valid as the Sun rises in the West and sets in the East. That all
depends on how you define west and east... ;) I guess.

Incidentally, Roger seems to think that Scientology wants to destroy
the Internet. He is as wrong as Cornelius is right.

--
Web page summary: http://www.entheta.net
The best overall site: http://www.xenu.net
Chris Owen's well researched site:
http://www.demon.co.uk/castle/audit/index.html.
The name says it all: http://www.ronthewarhero.org
Co$ book list:http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Library
Real player files of Co$, pickets, LRH, etc:
http://www.xenutv.com

roger gonnet

unread,
Feb 12, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/12/00
to

Cornelius Krasel <kra...@wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de> a écrit dans le
message : i15188...@wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de...

> roger gonnet <sect...@worldnet.fr> wrote:
> > would you be surprized to learn that hyperspam attacks toward search
> > engines, eBay, Amazon and others could be the testing of a new spam sort
> > from our pet tchudch?
>
> Yes. I don't see any reason why the Church of Scientology might be

> interested in attacking Amazon or eBay.

sure: unless it wants the whole internet trick down... or unless wanting to
test their trick; like a said, while remaining undetected possible spammers.

roger

RUPROSE

unread,
Mar 7, 2000, 3:00:00 AM3/7/00
to
>Subject: Re: Search engines attacks
>From: rup...@aol.com (RUPROSE)
>Date: 2/11/100 7:33 AM PST
>Message-id: <20000211103358...@ng-fk1.aol.com>

>
>>I don't see any reason why the Church of Scientology might be
>>interested in attacking Amazon or eBay.
>>
0 new messages