Pathetically Obvious Footbullet Postings
The Write Goddess
years with their CCHR bullcrap. I'm already used to reading line
after line of discussions dealing with Nina Reyes' hatred of
psychiatry (and her made-up information about how evil they are), but
now she's posting articles bumping WILL SMITH MOVIES!
It's another painful footbullet. How can they convince us of their
righteousness and sincerity when they are so obviously corrupt?!?!?!
How can Scienos believe that the rest of the internet is as gullible
as they have been brainwashed into being? Maybe that question answers
itself...
Jonathon Barbera
<Rachel.B...@gmail.com> wrote:
>It's bad enough that the Scientolobots have been on this board for
>years with their CCHR bullcrap. I'm already used to reading line
>after line of discussions dealing with Nina Reyes' hatred of
>psychiatry (and her made-up information about how evil they are), but
>now she's posting articles bumping WILL SMITH MOVIES!
>
>It's another painful footbullet. How can they convince us of their
>righteousness and sincerity when they are so obviously corrupt?!?!?!
>
Who is "they"? I don't know who "Nina" is, but that individual does
not represent the Church of Scientology or Scientologists. She can
have her own opinion, right?
I haven't seen Will Smith's movie, but whether or not he is a
Scientologist doesn't affect me. I can't think of any religion that
Will Smith could have that would make me want to see or avoid one of
his movies. He's an excellent actor no matter what religion he has.
banchukita
wrote:
> It's bad enough that the Scientolobots have been on this board for
> years with their CCHR bullcrap. I'm already used to reading line
> after line of discussions dealing with Nina Reyes' hatred of
> psychiatry (and her made-up information about how evil they are), but
> now she's posting articles bumping WILL SMITH MOVIES!
Well, it's been over a decade since Elaine Seigel sent the memo about
trying to clean up the 'snake pit' of a.r.s. by outposting the
'handful' of critics with Good News.
The Good News ran out before the criticism topics, and it was shortly
thereafter that posts of nonsense garbled words replaced the success
stories [sort of interchageable, anyway] and then the Time of
Sporgeries began.
More recently, the modus operandi has been repeated attempts at
distracting people from issues while making it look like
Scientologists are people on a worthwhile mission.
>
> It's another painful footbullet. How can they convince us of their
> righteousness and sincerity when they are so obviously corrupt?!?!?!
They can't even convince themselves. How can they convince us?
>
> How can Scienos believe that the rest of the internet is as gullible
> as they have been brainwashed into being? Maybe that question answers
> itself...
I'm not sure how people who adhere to Scientology for awhile recognize
the spiritual scurvy and leave; most members don't stick around for
long, though.
I don't think Scientologists are inherently stupid, and I don't know
if it's really all gullibility. I don't think there's one stock
answer for why some people are susceptible to Scientology while others
aren't.
-maggie, human beinge